1
|
Yadav S, Lowery B, Tuchayi AM, Jiang F, Saelee R, Aggarwal RR, Juarez R, Flavell RR, Hope TA. Impact of Posttreatment SPECT/CT on Patient Management During 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1395-1401. [PMID: 39117452 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
177Lu can be imaged after administration using SPECT/CT. Most work to date has focused on using posttreatment imaging to measure normal organ and tumor dose. We aimed to assess the impact of posttreatment SPECT/CT on the management of patients undergoing 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Methods: In this retrospective study, 122 patients underwent PSMA RPT with subsequent SPECT/CT 24 h after treatment. We determined a qualitative response at each cycle and reviewed patient charts to assess the impact that posttreatment SPECT/CT had on patient management. Changes in patient management were classified as changes on the basis of progression and response, and specific cycles when they occurred were noted. Miscellaneous changes in patient management were also evaluated. Results: Among the 122 consecutive patients examined, 42%-56% exhibited stable disease, whereas 19%-39% of patients exhibited response on visual assessment across treatment cycles. In total, 49% (n = 60) of patients experienced changes in management, of which 57% (n = 34) were due to progression, 40% (n = 24) were due to response, and 3% (n = 2) were due to miscellaneous changes. Changes due to disease progression were observed mostly after cycles 2 and 4. Changes due to response to RPT occurred mostly after cycles 3 and 4. Conclusion: At our center, 49% of patients experienced changes in management based on posttreatment SPECT/CT, and most of these changes occurred at cycles 2 and 4. Integrating posttreatment SPECT/CT into routine PSMA RPT protocols can aid in patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surekha Yadav
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Blair Lowery
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Abuzar Moradi Tuchayi
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Fei Jiang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rachelle Saelee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rahul R Aggarwal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Roxanna Juarez
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Robert R Flavell
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pan J, Wu J, Wang B, Zhu B, Liu X, Gan H, Wei Y, Jin S, Hu X, Wang Q, Song S, Liu C, Ye D, Zhu Y. Interlesional response heterogeneity is associated with the prognosis of abiraterone treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. MED 2024:S2666-6340(24)00302-7. [PMID: 39151419 DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interlesional response heterogeneity (ILRH) poses challenges to the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Currently, there are no prospective clinical trials exploring the prognostic significance of ILRH on paired positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the context of abiraterone therapy. METHODS In this prospective study, we enrolled patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05188911; ChiCTR.org.cn: ChiCTR2000034708). 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)+18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring were performed at baseline and week 13. Patients were grouped by their early ILRH measurement. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the predictive role of ILRH for conventional progression-free survival (PFS) through the concordance index (C-index) assessment. Conventional PFS was defined as the time from medication to conventional radiographic progression, clinical progression, or death. FINDINGS Ultimately, 33 patients were included with a median follow-up of 28.7 months. Baseline+week 13 PSMA PET/CT revealed that 33.3% of patients showed ILRH. Those patients with hetero-responding disease had significantly different PFS compared to the responding and non-responding groups (hazard ratio: responding group = reference, hetero-responding group = 4.0, non-responding group = 5.8; p < 0.0001). The C-index of ILRH on paired PSMA PET/CT (0.742 vs. 0.660) and FDG PET/CT (0.736 vs. 0.668) for conventional PFS was higher than that of PSA response. In an exploratory analysis, PSMA-/FDG+ lesions at week 13 were identified as a strong surrogate for poor conventional PFS (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS ILRH on both baseline+week 13 PSMA and FDG PET/CT strongly associated with conventional PFS. FUNDING This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China and Shanghai.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Pan
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Junlong Wu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Beihe Wang
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaohang Liu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Hualei Gan
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Wei
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengming Jin
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoxin Hu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Qifeng Wang
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaoli Song
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yao Zhu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Genitourinary Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dell'Oro M, Huff DT, Lokre O, Kendrick J, Munian Govindan R, Ong JSL, Ebert MA, Perk TG, Francis RJ. Assessing the Heterogeneity of Response of [ 68Ga] Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Lesions in Patients With Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102155. [PMID: 39096564 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer can be difficult due to the heterogeneity of response of lesions. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (PSMA) PET/CT assists with monitoring and directing clinical intervention; however, the impact of response heterogeneity has yet to be related to outcome measures. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of quantitative imaging information on the value of PSMA PET/CT to assess patient outcomes in response evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Baseline and follow-up (6 months) PSMA PET/CT of 162 men with oligometastatic PC treated with standard clinical care were acquired between 2015 and 2016 for analysis. An augmentative software medical device was used to track lesions between scans and quantify lesion change to categorize them as either new, increasing, stable, decreasing, or disappeared. Quantitative imaging features describing the size, intensity, extent, change, and heterogeneity of change (based on percent change in SUVtotal) among lesions were extracted and evaluated for association with overall survival (OS) using Cox regression models. Model performance was evaluated using the c-index. RESULTS Forty-one (25%) of subjects demonstrated heterogeneous response at follow-up, defined as having at least 1 new or increasing lesion and at least 1 decreasing or disappeared lesion. Subjects with heterogeneous response demonstrated significantly shorter OS than subjects without (median OS = 76.6 months vs. median OS not reached, P < .05, c-index = 0.61). In univariate analyses, SUVtotal at follow-up was most strongly associated with OS (HR = 1.29 [1.19, 1.40], P < .001, c-index = 0.73). Multivariable models applied using heterogeneity of change features demonstrated higher performance (c-index = 0.79) than models without (c-index = 0.71-0.76, P < .05). CONCLUSION Augmentative software tools enhance the evaluation change on serial PSMA PET scans and can facilitate lesional evaluation between timepoints. This study demonstrates that a heterogeneous response at a lesional level may impact adversely on patient outcomes and supports further investigation to evaluate the role of imaging to guide individualized patient management to improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
| | | | | | - Jake Kendrick
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Jeremy S L Ong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research, Perth, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
| | | | - Roslyn J Francis
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li H, Gong Q, Luo K. Biomarker-driven molecular imaging probes in radiotherapy. Theranostics 2024; 14:4127-4146. [PMID: 38994026 PMCID: PMC11234278 DOI: 10.7150/thno.97768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Biomarker-driven molecular imaging has emerged as an integral part of cancer precision radiotherapy. The use of molecular imaging probes, including nanoprobes, have been explored in radiotherapy imaging to precisely and noninvasively monitor spatiotemporal distribution of biomarkers, potentially revealing tumor-killing mechanisms and therapy-induced adverse effects during radiation treatment. Methods: We summarized literature reports from preclinical studies and clinical trials, which cover two main parts: 1) Clinically-investigated and emerging imaging biomarkers associated with radiotherapy, and 2) instrumental roles, functions, and activatable mechanisms of molecular imaging probes in the radiotherapy workflow. In addition, reflection and future perspectives are proposed. Results: Numerous imaging biomarkers have been continuously explored in decades, while few of them have been successfully validated for their correlation with radiotherapeutic outcomes and/or radiation-induced toxicities. Meanwhile, activatable molecular imaging probes towards the emerging biomarkers have exhibited to be promising in animal or small-scale human studies for precision radiotherapy. Conclusion: Biomarker-driven molecular imaging probes are essential for precision radiotherapy. Despite very inspiring preliminary results, validation of imaging biomarkers and rational design strategies of probes await robust and extensive investigations. Especially, the correlation between imaging biomarkers and radiotherapeutic outcomes/toxicities should be established through multi-center collaboration involving a large cohort of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haonan Li
- Department of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Qiyong Gong
- Department of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China
- Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province and Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
- Department of Radiology, West China Xiamen Hospital of Sichuan University, 699 Jinyuan Xi Road, Jimei District, 361021 Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Kui Luo
- Department of Radiology, Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China
- Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province and Research Unit of Psychoradiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seifert R, Gafita A, Solnes LB, Iagaru A. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen: Interpretation Criteria, Standardized Reporting, and the Use of Machine Learning. PET Clin 2024; 19:363-369. [PMID: 38705743 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is routinely used for the staging and restaging of patients with various stages of prostate cancer. For clear communication with referring physicians and to improve inter-reader agreement, the use of standardized reporting templates is mandatory. Increasingly, tumor volume is used by reporting and response assessment frameworks to prognosticate patient outcome or measure response to therapy. However, the quantification of tumor volume is often too time-consuming in routine clinical practice. Machine learning-based tools can facilitate the quantification of tumor volume for improved outcome prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Andrei Gafita
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lilja B Solnes
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive H2200, Stanford 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Madan RA, Yu EY, Posadas EM, Lee RJ, Karzai F, Choyke PL. Restaging With Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Imaging in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: When Seeing More Is Detrimental to Care. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2242-2244. [PMID: 38489582 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
#PSMA is amazing new tech but is using it to expedite the call of disease progression helping #ProstateCancer patients?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi A Madan
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Evan Y Yu
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Edwin M Posadas
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Richard J Lee
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Fatima Karzai
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Peter L Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahmadzadehfar H, Seifert R, Afshar-Oromieh A, Kratochwil C, Rahbar K. Prostate Cancer Theranostics With 177Lu-PSMA. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:581-590. [PMID: 38570288 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
This review paper highlights the transformative role of PSMA-targeted diagnostics and therapy in prostate cancer management, particularly focusing on 177Lu-PSMA-617, approved by the FDA and EMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients post-chemotherapy and ARPI treatment. Originating from the VISION trial's success, this paper navigates the current radioligand therapy (RLT) indications, emphasizing practical patient selection, planning, and treatment execution. It critically examines Lu-PSMA's comparative effectiveness against cabazitaxel and Ra-223, addressing decision-making dilemmas for mCRPC treatments. Furthermore, the paper discusses Lu-PSMA in chemotherapy-naïve patients and its application in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, underlined by ongoing global studies. A significant concern is Lu-PSMA's long-term safety profile, particularly nephrotoxicity risks, necessitating further investigation. The possibility of Lu-PSMA rechallenge in responsive patients is explored, stressing the need for comprehensive analyses and real-world data to refine treatment protocols. Conclusively, PSMA-targeted therapy marks a significant advance in prostate cancer therapy, advocating for its integration into a multimodal, patient-centric treatment approach. The review underscores the imperative for additional comparative studies to optimize treatment sequences and outcomes, ultimately enhancing long-term prognosis and disease control in prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Westfalen, Dortmund, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Clemens Kratochwil
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany; West German Cancer Center, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yechiel Y, Chicheportiche A, Keidar Z, Ben-Haim S. Prostate Cancer Radioligand Therapy: Beta-labeled Radiopharmaceuticals. PET Clin 2024; 19:389-399. [PMID: 38679550 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2024.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men worldwide, with an estimated 174,650 new cases per year in the United States, and the second cancer-related cause of death, after lung cancer, with 31,620 deaths per year. While the 5 year survival rate for prostate cancer in patients without metastatic spread is nearly 100%, those with distant metastases have 5 year survival rates of approximately 30%. Initial diagnosis and assessment are based on PSA levels, Gleason score (derived from prostate biopsy), and advanced imaging modalities, including prostate MR imaging and PSMA-PET/computed tomography in patients with high-risk features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaniv Yechiel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
| | | | - Zohar Keidar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Simona Ben-Haim
- Department of Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem, Israel; Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Swiha M, Gafita A, Nguyen A, Emmett L. Treatment Response Imaging in Prostate Cancer. PET Clin 2024; 19:417-430. [PMID: 38670877 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2024.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Objective criteria for measuring treatment response in prostate cancer are critical to clinical research and practice. The Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria are widely accepted relying only on conventional imaging for radiographic treatment response. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography was proven to be superior to conventional imaging in initial diagnosis and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Moreover, there is growing evidence of its role in treatment response assessment in prostate cancer. This study will review the different criteria for imaging treatment response on conventional and advanced molecular imaging for different therapies, and the future perspective in posttherapy imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Swiha
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
| | - Andrei Gafita
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Division, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Andrew Nguyen
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Seifert R, Telli T, Lapa C, Desaulniers M, Hekimsoy T, Weber WA, Pfob C, Hadaschik B, Bögemann M, Schäfers M, Herrmann K, Rahbar K, Eiber M, Fendler WP. Safety and Efficacy of Extended Therapy with [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA: A German Multicenter Study. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:909-916. [PMID: 38697669 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Prospective results have demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy for up to 6 cycles in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, no systematic data are available outlining the feasibility of extended therapy beyond 6 cycles. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy in patients who have received more than 6 cycles. Methods: In total, 111 patients were included in this multicenter retrospective analysis. Based on individual decisions, patients underwent uninterrupted continuation of therapy (continuous treatment) or reexposure after a therapy break (rechallenge treatment) between 2014 and 2023. Overall survival, 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline (measured 8-12 wk after treatment initiation or rechallenge), PSMA PET response, and grades per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were assessed. χ2 tests, multivariable Cox regression analysis, and log-rank tests were applied for statistical analyses. Results: Patients received extended treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA, either as a continuous treatment (43/111, 38.7%) or as a rechallenge (68/111, 61.3%) treatment, with median cumulative doses of 57.4 or 60.8 GBq, respectively. Overall survival from the initiation of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA was 31.3, 23.2, and 40.2 mo for the entire cohort, the continuous treatment group, and the rechallenge treatment group, respectively. The initial 50% PSA decline was significantly higher in the retreated group than in the continuous group (57/63 [90.4%] vs. 26/42 [61.9%]; P = 0.006). A 50% PSA decline was observed in 23 of 62 patients (37.1%) after the first rechallenge. The rate of grades 3-4 toxicity was comparable between continuous and rechallenge treatments (anemia, 7/43 [16.3%] vs. 13/68 [19.1%)], P = 0.6; leukocytopenia, 1/43 [2.3%] vs. 2/67 [3.0%], P = 0.3; thrombocytopenia, 3/43 [7.0%] vs. 3/68 [4.4%], P = 0.3; renal, 2/43 [4.7%] vs. 5/68 [7.4%], P = 0.2). Conclusion: Extended therapy with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA is safe and has not been associated with increased grades 3-4 toxicity. Patient candidates for extended treatment experienced a favorable median survival of 31.3 mo from the first administration. Response under [177Lu]Lu-PSMA rechallenge demonstrated preserved efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA after a treatment break.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Tugce Telli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Constantin Lapa
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Mélanie Desaulniers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Turkay Hekimsoy
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang A Weber
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Pfob
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Martin Bögemann
- West German Cancer, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Schäfers
- West German Cancer, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- West German Cancer, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gafita A, Djaileb L, Rauscher I, Fendler WP, Hadaschik B, Rowe SP, Herrmann K, Solnes LB, Calais J, Rettig MB, Weber M, Farolfi A, Benz MR, Eiber M. RECIP 1.0 Predicts Progression-Free Survival After [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:917-922. [PMID: 38637143 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Response Evaluation Criteria in Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Imaging (RECIP) 1.0 is an evidence-based framework to evaluate therapeutic efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of interim PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 with short-term outcome after radiopharmaceutical treatment. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy at 3 academic centers and received PSMA PET/CT at baseline and at 12 wk. Pairs of PSMA PET/CT images were assessed by 5 readers for visual RECIP 1.0. The primary outcome was the association of RECIP with prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: In total, 124 of 287 screened patients met the inclusion criteria, with 0 (0%), 29 (23%), 54 (44%), and 41 (33%) of those 124 patients having complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease (PD) by visual RECIP 1.0, respectively. Patients with visual RECIP PD had a significantly shorter PSA-PFS than those with RECIP stable disease or with RECIP partial response (2.6 vs. 6.4 vs. 8.4 mo; P < 0.001). The median PSA-PFS among patients with RECIP PD versus those with non-RECIP PD was 2.6 versus 7.2 mo (hazard ratio, 13.0; 95% CI, 7.0-24.1; P < 0.001). Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 after 2 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA is prognostic for PSA-PFS. PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 may be used in earlier stages of prostate cancer to evaluate drug efficacy and to predict progression-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei Gafita
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Loic Djaileb
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- LRB, Nuclear Medicine Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Isabel Rauscher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lilja B Solnes
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; and
| | - Matthias R Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Miceli A, Liberini V, Pepe G, Dondi F, Vento A, Jonghi Lavarini L, Celesti G, Gazzilli M, Serani F, Guglielmo P, Buschiazzo A, Filice R, Alongi P, Laudicella R, Santo G. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Oncological Applications beyond Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Other Radiopharmaceuticals. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1002. [PMID: 38786300 PMCID: PMC11119694 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed on the surface of tumor cells in most of the patients affected by prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa). However, PSMA expression has also been demonstrated in the endothelial cells of newly formed vessels of various solid tumors, suggesting a role for PSMA in neoangiogenesis. In this scenario, gallium-68 (68Ga) or fluoro-18 (18F)-labeled PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) may play a role in tumors other than PCa, generally evaluated employing other radiopharmaceuticals targeting different pathways. This review aims to investigate the detection rate of PSMA-PET compared to other radiopharmaceuticals (especially [18F]FDG) in non-prostate tumors to identify patients who may benefit from the use of such a theragnostic agent. METHODS We performed a bibliographic search on three different databases until February 2024 using the following terms: "positron emission tomography", "PET", "PET/CT", "Prostate-specific membrane antigen", "PSMA", "non-prostate", "not prostate cancer", "solid tumor", "FDG", "Fluorodeoxyglucose", "FAPi", "FET", "MET", "DOPA", "choline", "FCH", "FES", "DOTATOC", "DOTANOC", and "DOTATATE". Only original articles edited in English with at least 10 patients were included. RESULTS Out of a total of 120 articles, only 25 original articles comparing PSMA with other radiotracers were included in this study. The main evidence was demonstrated in renal cell carcinoma, where PSMA showed a higher detection rate compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT, with implications for patient management. PSMA PET may also improve the assessment of other entities, such as gliomas, in defining regions of early neoangiogenesis. Further data are needed to evaluate the potential role of PSMA-PET in triple-negative breast cancer as a novel therapeutic vascular target. Finally, unclear applications of PSMA-PET include thyroid and gastrointestinal tumors. CONCLUSIONS The present review shows the potential use of PSMA-labeled PET/CT in solid tumors beyond PCa, underlining its value over other radiopharmaceuticals (mainly [18F]FDG). Prospective clinical trials with larger sample sizes are crucial to further investigate these possible clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Miceli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy;
| | - Virginia Liberini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASO S.Croce e Carle Cuneo, 12100 Cuneo, Italy; (V.L.); (A.B.)
| | - Giovanna Pepe
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo—Pavia V.le Camillo Golgi, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Francesco Dondi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Antonio Vento
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASP 1—P.O. San Giovanni di Dio, 92100 Agrigento, Italy;
| | | | - Greta Celesti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (G.C.); (R.L.)
| | - Maria Gazzilli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASL Bari—Di Venere Bari, 70131 Bari, Italy;
| | - Francesca Serani
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Presidio Ospedaliero Santo Spirito, 65124 Pescara, Italy;
| | - Priscilla Guglielmo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Ambra Buschiazzo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASO S.Croce e Carle Cuneo, 12100 Cuneo, Italy; (V.L.); (A.B.)
| | - Rossella Filice
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital “Paolo Giaccone”, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Pierpaolo Alongi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy; (G.C.); (R.L.)
| | - Giulia Santo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen DC, Huang S, Buteau JP, Kashyap R, Hofman MS. Clinical Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: Quarter-Century Transformation of Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging. PET Clin 2024; 19:261-279. [PMID: 38199918 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Although positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) underwent rapid growth during the last quarter-century, becoming a new standard-of-care for imaging most cancer types, CT and bone scan remained the gold standard for patients with prostate cancer. This occurred as 2-fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose was perceived to have a limited role owing to low sensitivity in many patients. A resurgence of interest occurred with the use of fluorine-18-sodium-fluoride PET/CT as a replacement for bone scintigraphy, and then choline, fluciclovine, and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) PET/CT as prostate "specific" radiotracers. The last decade, however, has seen a true revolution with the meteoric rise of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Chen
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Siyu Huang
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne
| | - James P Buteau
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Raghava Kashyap
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hartrampf PE, Hüttmann T, Seitz AK, Kübler H, Serfling SE, Higuchi T, Schlötelburg W, Michalski K, Gafita A, Rowe SP, Pomper MG, Buck AK, Werner RA. Prognostic Performance of RECIP 1.0 Based on [ 18F]PSMA-1007 PET in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:560-565. [PMID: 38453363 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT), the recently proposed criteria for evaluating response to PSMA PET (RECIP 1.0) based on 68Ga- and 18F-labeled PET agents provided prognostic information in addition to changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic performance of this framework for overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing RLT and imaged with [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT and compare the prognostic performance with the PSA-based response assessment. Methods: In total, 73 patients with mCRPC who were scanned with [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT before and after 2 cycles of RLT were retrospectively analyzed. We calculated the changes in serum PSA levels (ΔPSA) and quantitative PET parameters for the whole-body tumor burden (SUVmean, SUVmax, PSMA tumor volume, and total lesion PSMA). Men were also classified following the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria for ΔPSA and RECIP 1.0 for PET imaging response. We performed univariable Cox regression analysis, followed by multivariable and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: Median OS was 15 mo with a median follow-up time of 14 mo. Univariable Cox regression analysis provided significant associations with OS for ΔPSA (per percentage, hazard ratio [HR], 1.004; 95% CI, 1.002-1.007; P < 0.001) and PSMA tumor volume (per unit, HR, 1.003; 95% CI, 1.000-1.005; P = 0.03). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed ΔPSA (per percentage, HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.001-1.006; P = 0.006) as an independent prognosticator for OS. Kaplan-Meier analyses provided significant segregation between individuals with versus those without any PSA response (19 mo vs. 14 mo; HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.95-4.18; P = 0.04). Differentiation between patients with or without progressive disease (PD) was also feasible when applying PSA-based PCWG3 (19 mo vs. 9 mo for non-PD and PD, respectively; HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.03-5.09; P = 0.01) but slightly failed when applying RECIP 1.0 (P = 0.08). A combination of both response systems (PCWG3 and RECIP 1.0), however, yielded the best discrimination between individuals without versus those with PD (19 mo vs. 8 mo; HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.32-5.86; P = 0.002). Conclusion: In patients with mCRPC treated with RLT and imaged with [18F]PSMA-1007, frameworks integrating both the biochemical (PCWG3) and PET-based response (RECIP 1.0) may best assist in identifying subjects prone to disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp E Hartrampf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
| | - Thomas Hüttmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anna Katharina Seitz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Hubert Kübler
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Takahiro Higuchi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Wiebke Schlötelburg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Michalski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andrei Gafita
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and
| | - Martin G Pomper
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Andreas K Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf A Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Eisazadeh R, Mirshahvalad SA, Schwieghofer-Zwink G, Hehenwarter L, Rendl G, Gampenrieder S, Greil R, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Pre-treatment 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Prognostic Value in Predicting Response to 177Lu-PSMA-I&T Therapy and Patient Survival. Mol Imaging Biol 2024; 26:360-369. [PMID: 38360991 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-024-01900-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the prognostic value of pre-treatment [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and other baseline clinical characteristics in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) patients response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA (PSMA-I&T), as well as patient survival. PROCEDURES In this retrospective study, 81 patients who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T between October 2018 and January 2023 were reviewed. Eligible patients had metastatic castration-resistant PCa, underwent pre-treatment [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and had serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels available. On PET/CT images, SUVmax, SULmax, SUVpeak, and SULpeak of the most-avid tumoral lesion, as well as SUVmean of the parotid gland (P-SUVmean) and liver (L-SUVmean), were measured. Also, whole-body PSMA tumour volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA) were calculated. To interpret treatment response after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T, a composite of PSA values and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT findings were considered. The outcomes were dichotomised into progressive versus controlled (stable disease or partial response) disease. Then, the association of baseline parameters with patient response was evaluated. Also, survival analyses were performed to assess baseline parameters in predicting overall survival. RESULTS Sixty patients (age:73 ± 8, PSA:185 ± 371) were included. Patients received at least one cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy (median = 4). Overall, half of the patients showed disease progression. In the progressive versus controlled disease evaluation, the highest SULmax, as well as SUVmax and SULmax to both backgrounds (L-SUVmean and P-SUVmean), were significantly correlated with the outcome (p-values < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, only SULmax to the L-SUVmean remained significant (p-value = 0.038). The best cut-off was 8 (AUC = 0.71). With a median follow-up of 360 days, 11 mortal events were documented. In the multivariate survival analysis, only SULmax to P-SUVmean (cut-off = 2.4; p-value = 0.043) retained significance (hazard ratio = 4.0). CONCLUSIONS A greater level of PSMA uptake, specifically higher tumour-to-background uptake in the hottest lesion, may hold substantial prognostic significance, considering both [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T response and patient survival. These ratios may have the potential to be used for PCa patient selection for radioligand therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roya Eisazadeh
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto (UMIT), University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gregor Schwieghofer-Zwink
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas Hehenwarter
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gundula Rendl
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Simon Gampenrieder
- Department of Internal Medicine III With Haematology, Medical Oncology, and Oncologic Center, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III With Haematology, Medical Oncology, and Oncologic Center, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christian Pirich
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Farolfi A, Armstrong WR, Djaileb L, Gafita A, Hotta M, Allen-Auerbach M, Unterrainer LM, Fendler WP, Rettig M, Eiber M, Hofman MS, Hadaschik B, Herrmann K, Czernin J, Calais J, Benz MR. Differences and Common Ground in 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Practice Patterns: International Survey of 95 Theranostic Centers. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:438-445. [PMID: 38238041 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy effectively treats metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients requiring treatment, and consequently the number of theranostic centers, are expected to increase significantly after Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval. This requires standardization or harmonization among theranostic centers. The aim of this study was to assess operational differences and similarities among 177Lu-PSMA treatment centers. Methods: A questionnaire comprising 62 items, designed by a core team of 5 physicians and externally reviewed by international experts, was developed. Study participants were asked to provide answers about their center, patient selection, radiopharmaceuticals, clinical assessment before and after 177Lu-PSMA treatments, laboratory values, treatment discontinuation, posttreatment imaging, and general information. An invitation e-mail to participate in the study was sent in June 2022. Duplicates were removed to allow for only one valid response per center. Results: Ninety-five of 211 (45%) contacted centers completed the questionnaire. Most participating centers were in Europe (51%), followed by America (22%) and Asia (22%). During the 12 mo before this study, a total of 5,906 patients received 177Lu-PSMA therapy at the 95 participating centers. Most of these patients were treated in Europe (2,840/5,906; 48%), followed by Asia (1,313/5,906; 22%) and Oceania (1,225/5,906; 21%). PSMA PET eligibility for 177Lu-PSMA was determined most frequently using 68Ga-PSMA-11 (77%). Additional pretherapy imaging included 18F-FDG PET/CT, CT, renal scintigraphy, and bone scintigraphy at 41 (49%), 27 (32%), 25 (30%), and 13 (15%), respectively, of the 84 centers for clinical standard of care, compassionate care, or local research protocols and 11 (26%), 25 (60%), 9 (21%), and 28 (67%), respectively, of the 42 centers for industry-sponsored trials. PSMA PET eligibility criteria included subjective qualitative assessment of PSMA positivity at 33% of centers, VISION criteria at 23%, and TheraP criteria at 13%. The mean standard injected activity per cycle was 7.3 GBq (range, 5.5-11.1 GBq). Sixty-two (65%) centers applied standardized response assessment criteria, and PSMA PET Progression Criteria were the most applied (37%). Conclusion: Results from this international survey revealed interinstitutional differences in several aspects of 177Lu-PSMA radionuclide therapy, including patient selection, administered activity, and the response assessment strategy. Standardization or harmonization of protocols and dedicated training are desirable in anticipation of increasing numbers of patients and theranostic centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Farolfi
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Wesley R Armstrong
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Loic Djaileb
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- LRB, Nuclear Medicine Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, University of Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, Grenoble, France
| | - Andrei Gafita
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Masatoshi Hotta
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Martin Allen-Auerbach
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthew Rettig
- Department of Medicine and Urology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthias R Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Weiner AB, Agrawal R, Valle LF, Sonni I, Kishan AU, Rettig MB, Raman SS, Calais J, Boutros PC, Reiter RE. Impact of PSMA PET on Prostate Cancer Management. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:191-205. [PMID: 38270802 PMCID: PMC11034977 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01181-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT PSMA-PET has been a practice-changing imaging biomarker for the management of men with PCa. Research suggests improved accuracy over conventional imaging and other PET radiotracers in many contexts. With multiple approved PSMA-targeting radiotracers, PSMA PET will become even more available in clinical practice. Its increased use requires an understanding of the prospective data available and caution when extrapolating from prior trial data that utilized other imaging modalities. Future trials leveraging PSMA PET for treatment optimization and management decision-making will ultimately drive its clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam B Weiner
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Institute for Precision Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Raag Agrawal
- Institute for Precision Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Luca F Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ida Sonni
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Steven S Raman
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Institute for Precision Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Unterrainer LM, Calais J, Bander NH. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Gateway to Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Annu Rev Med 2024; 75:49-66. [PMID: 38285513 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-081522-031439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as a transmembrane protein is overexpressed by prostate cancer (PC) cells and is accessible for binding antibodies or low-molecular-weight radioligands due to its extracellular portion. Successful targeting of PSMA began with the development of humanized J591 antibody. Due to their faster clearance compared to antibodies, small-molecule radioligands for targeted imaging and therapy of PC have been favored in recent development efforts. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has higher diagnostic performance than conventional imaging for initial staging of high-risk PC and biochemical recurrence detection/localization. However, it remains to be demonstrated how to integrate PSMA PET imaging for therapy response assessment and as an outcome endpoint measure in clinical trials. With the recent approval of 177Lu-PSMA-617 by the US Food and Drug Administration for metastatic castration-resistant PC progressing after chemotherapy, the high value of PSMA-targeted therapy was confirmed. Compared to standard of care, PSMA-based radioligand therapy led to a better outcome and a higher quality of life. This review, focusing on the advanced PC setting, provides an overview of different approved and nonapproved PSMA-targeted imaging and therapeutic modalities and discusses the future of PSMA-targeted theranostics, also with an outlook on non-radiopharmaceutical-based PSMA-targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Unterrainer
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; ,
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; ,
| | - Neil H Bander
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA;
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Seifert R, Gafita A, Telli T, Voter A, Herrmann K, Pomper M, Hadaschik B, Rowe SP, Fendler WP. Standardized PSMA-PET Imaging of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:60-68. [PMID: 37573199 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
Imaging of advanced prostate cancer is a challenging task, as it requires longitudinal characterization of disease extent in a standardized way to enable appropriate treatment selection and evaluation of treatment efficacy. In the last years, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT has become the reference standard examination for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Together with the rise of PSMA-PET, standardized frameworks for the reporting of image findings have been proposed, eg, the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) and the structured reporting system for PSMA targeted PET imaging (PSMA-RADS) framework. Therefore, recent evidence on PSMA-PET derived tumor volume as useful a biomarker for outcome prognostication and related frameworks will be discussed in the article. The PROMISE framework recommends quantifying the tumor volume per-organ system, which accounts for the fact that the location of the metastases greatly influence its biological aggressiveness. In addition, changes in PSMA-PET derived tumor volume have been shown to be promising biomarkers for response assessment. Limitations of PSMA-PET will also be discussed because the tumor volume might not always be suited for response assessment. As a pitfall of PSMA-based systems, decreasing PSMA-expression might erroneously be interpreted as response to therapy. Also, especially for patients with limited disease, the tumor volume might not be ideal for response assessment. Therefore, various frameworks have been introduced to objectively measure response to therapy with PSMA-PET. Amongst these, the PSMA-PET progression (PPP) criteria and the response evaluation criteria in PSMA (RECIP) are optimized for earlier and later phenotypes of advanced prostate cancer, respectively. Variables needed to determine PPP or RECIP outcome on PSMA-PET are recorded under the umbrella of PROMISE recommendations. In this article, various reporting and response assessment frameworks are explained and discussed. Also, recent evidence for the relevance of PSMA-PET biomarkers for clinical management and outcome prognostication are shown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - A Gafita
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - T Telli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andrew Voter
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Pomper
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - B Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - W P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Puranik AD, Choudhury S, Ghosh S, Dev ID, Ramchandani V, Uppal A, Bhosale V, Palsapure A, Rungta R, Pandey R, Khatri S, George G, Satamwar Y, Maske R, Agrawal A, Shah S, Purandare NC, Rangarajan V. Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Use of Nuclear medicine diagnostic and treatment modalities in cancer. Indian J Cancer 2024; 61:S1-S28. [PMID: 38424680 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_52_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT PET/CT and radioisotope therapy are diagnostic and therapeutic arms of Nuclear Medicine, respectively. With the emergence of better technology, PET/CT has become an accessible modality. Diagnostic tracers exploring disease-specific targets has led the clinicians to look beyond FDG PET. Moreover, with the emergence of theranostic pairs of radiopharmaceuticals, radioisotope therapy is gradually making it's way into treatment algorithm of common cancers in India. We therefore would like to discuss in detail the updates in PET/CT imaging and radionuclide therapy and generate a consensus-driven evidence based document which would guide the practitioners of Oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameya D Puranik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Swiha M, Ayati N, Oprea-Lager DE, Ceci F, Emmett L. How to Report PSMA PET. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:14-29. [PMID: 37558507 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer diagnosed in men in most developed countries and a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has become a valuable tool in the staging and assessment of disease recurrence in PCa, and more recently for assessment for treatment eligibility to PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). Harmonization of PSMA-PET interpretation and synoptic reports are needed to communicate concisely and reproducibly PSMA-PET/CT to referring physicians and to support clinician therapeutic management decisions in various stages of the disease. Uniform image interpretation is also important to provide comparable data between clinical trials and to translate such data from research to daily practice. This review provides an overview of the value of PSMA-PET across the different clinical stages of PCa, discusses published reporting criteria for PSMA-PET, identifies pitfalls in reporting PSMA, and provides recommendations for synoptic reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Swiha
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Narjess Ayati
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University. Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Civelek AC. PSMA PET Parameters for Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Prostate Cancer. Radiology 2023; 309:e233023. [PMID: 38051185 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Cahid Civelek
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 601 N Caroline St, JHOC 3225, Baltimore, MD 21287
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shagera QA, Karfis I, Kristanto P, Spyridon S, Diamand R, Santapau A, Peltier A, Roumeguère T, Flamen P, Artigas C. PSMA PET/CT for Response Assessment and Overall Survival Prediction in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1869-1875. [PMID: 37770114 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for response assessment and outcome prediction in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), including abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 ARPI-treated mCRPC patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT within 8 wk before (baseline) and 12 ± 4 wk after treatment initiation. Total PSMA tumor volume was calculated using the fixed threshold method (SUV ≥ 3). Patients were categorized as PSMA responders (PSMA-Rs) or PSMA nonresponders (PSMA-NRs) on the basis of both European Association of Urology/European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EAU/EANM) criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT (RECIP) 1.0. PSMA-R included patients with a complete response, a partial response, or stable disease, and PSMA-NR included those with progressive disease. On the basis of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), patients were classified as biochemical responders if PSA decreased by at least 50% and as nonresponders if it did not. The Φ-coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation of PSMA- and PSA-based responses. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression hazard model and the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictive accuracy was tested for both response criteria. Results: On the basis of PSMA PET/CT, 13 (43%) patients were PSMA-NR according to the EAU/EANM criteria and 11 (37%) patients were PSMA-NR according to RECIP 1.0. Significant correlations were observed between PSMA- and PSA-based responses for both criteria (Φ = 0.79 and 0.66, respectively). After a median follow-up of 25 mo (interquartile range, 21-43 mo), the median overall survival was significantly longer for PSMA-R than PSMA-NR (54 vs. 22 mo) for both the EAU/EANM criteria and RECIP 1.0, with hazard ratios of 6.9 (95% CI, 1.9-26; P = 0.004) and 5.6 (95% CI, 1.69-18.26, P = 0.005), respectively. No significant difference in predictive accuracy was found between the 2 criteria (C-index, 0.79 vs. 0.76, respectively, P = 0.54). Flare phenomena at the second PSMA PET study were not observed in our cohort. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that PSMA PET/CT is a valuable imaging biomarker for response assessment and overall survival prediction when performed at 3 mo after ARPI treatment initiation in mCRPC patients. Both proposed PSMA response criteria (EAU/EANM and RECIP 1.0) seem to perform equally well. No PSMA flare was observed. Prospective validation of these findings is strongly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qaid Ahmed Shagera
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ioannis Karfis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paulus Kristanto
- Data Centre, Unité de Gestion de l'Information, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sideris Spyridon
- Department of Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and
| | - Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albert Santapau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Peltier
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thierry Roumeguère
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick Flamen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carlos Artigas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hirata K, Kamagata K, Ueda D, Yanagawa M, Kawamura M, Nakaura T, Ito R, Tatsugami F, Matsui Y, Yamada A, Fushimi Y, Nozaki T, Fujita S, Fujioka T, Tsuboyama T, Fujima N, Naganawa S. From FDG and beyond: the evolving potential of nuclear medicine. Ann Nucl Med 2023; 37:583-595. [PMID: 37749301 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01865-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
The radiopharmaceutical 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has been dominantly used in positron emission tomography (PET) scans for over 20 years, and due to its vast utility its applications have expanded and are continuing to expand into oncology, neurology, cardiology, and infectious/inflammatory diseases. More recently, the addition of artificial intelligence (AI) has enhanced nuclear medicine diagnosis and imaging with FDG-PET, and new radiopharmaceuticals such as prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) have emerged. Nuclear medicine therapy using agents such as [177Lu]-dotatate surpasses conventional treatments in terms of efficacy and side effects. This article reviews recently established evidence of FDG and non-FDG drugs and anticipates the future trajectory of nuclear medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Hirata
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| | - Daiju Ueda
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yanagawa
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakaura
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Rintaro Ito
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Fuminari Tatsugami
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsui
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Akira Yamada
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-2621, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Fushimi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Taiki Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0016, Japan
| | - Shohei Fujita
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Fujioka
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuboyama
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Fujima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, N15, W5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|