Comparison of Large Language Models in Answering Immuno-Oncology Questions: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

The capability of large language models (LLMs) to understand and generate human-readable text has prompted the investigation of their potential as educational and management tools for patients with cancer and healthcare providers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study aimed at evaluating the ability of ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5, and Google Bard to answer questions related to 4 domains of immuno-oncology (Mechanisms, Indications, Toxicities, and Prognosis). We generated 60 open-ended questions (15 for each section). Questions were manually submitted to LLMs, and responses were collected on June 30, 2023. Two reviewers evaluated the answers independently.

RESULTS

ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 answered all questions, whereas Google Bard answered only 53.3% (P < .0001). The number of questions with reproducible answers was higher for ChatGPT-4 (95%) and ChatGPT3.5 (88.3%) than for Google Bard (50%) (P < .0001). In terms of accuracy, the number of answers deemed fully correct were 75.4%, 58.5%, and 43.8% for ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5, and Google Bard, respectively (P = .03). Furthermore, the number of responses deemed highly relevant was 71.9%, 77.4%, and 43.8% for ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5, and Google Bard, respectively (P = .04). Regarding readability, the number of highly readable was higher for ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 (98.1%) and (100%) compared to Google Bard (87.5%) (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 are potentially powerful tools in immuno-oncology, whereas Google Bard demonstrated relatively poorer performance. However, the risk of inaccuracy or incompleteness in the responses was evident in all 3 LLMs, highlighting the importance of expert-driven verification of the outputs returned by these technologies.

Biochemically recurrent prostate cancer in the era of EMBARK and PSMA PET imaging: everything has changed, except the patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) after unsuccessful curative therapies frequently have an indolent and asymptomatic disease course for years. There are no prospective data showing that treating BCR improves overall survival despite new imaging strategies and emerging therapeutic data. Managing BCR requires a unique perspective in oncology that balances toxicities and disease kinetics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging is now widely available and can define subclinical disease in patients with BCR who otherwise have negative CT and bone scans, but limited data exists showing that treating PSMA-positive disease has long term impact. A phase 3 trial demonstrated that the androgen receptor pathway inhibitor enzalutamide either alone or with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was superior in delaying metastasis, relative to ADT alone. Survival benefits from this study remain unknown.

SUMMARY

BCR is a heterogeneous population where overtreatment may present greater risk to patients than a disease course that is often indolent. Management of BCR should be individualized based on disease kinetics. Given the unique biology of BCR, future therapeutic research should emphasize an approach that alters disease trajectory without accompanying side effects and should explore options beyond ADT-based strategies.

Restaging With Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Imaging in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: When Seeing More Is Detrimental to Care

#PSMA is amazing new tech but is using it to expedite the call of disease progression helping #ProstateCancer patients?

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: Large Is Not Small

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer is complex, comprising a wide spectrum of phenotypes, which has led to very different entities being inappropriately lumped together or assumed to behave like more common entities. Elucidating subtle differences is critical for treatment decision making, as this commentary describes.

Increasing diversity in clinical trials: Demographic trends at the national cancer institute, 2005-2020

BACKGROUND

We described participant demographics for National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical trials at the Clinical Center (CC) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (NCI-CC participants) to identify enrollment disparities.

METHODS

We analyzed NCI-CC data from 2005-2020, calculated enrollment fractions (EF), compared with the U.S. cancer population represented by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer incidence data (2018) and the Cancer in North American (CiNA) database (2018), and with clinical trial disparities data from NCI's Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) and National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) (2005-2019), and from ClinicalTrials.gov (2003-2016).

RESULTS

NCI-CC (38,531 participants) had higher EF for older adults (OA) (8.5%), male (5.6%), Non-Hispanic (5.1%), Black/African American (AA) (5.3%) participants; lower women proportion across race and ethnicity; fewer female-sex-specific-cancer (6.8%) than male-sex-specific cancer (11.7%) participants. NCI-CC had lower median age than SEER (54.0 vs 65.4), more AA participants (12.0% vs 11.1%), fewer women (41.7% vs 49.5%), White (76.1% vs 80.5%), Asian/Pacific Islander (AP) (4.6% vs 6.0%), American Indian/Alaska Native (AI) (0.3% vs 0.5%) and Hispanic participants (7.1% vs 13%). NCI-CC had more AA, AP participants, fewer Hispanic participants than the NCORP and NCTN; more AA, Hispanic participants, fewer AP participants than ClinicalTrials.gov data. Improvement was noted for NCI-CC (OA, AA, AP, Hispanic participants).

CONCLUSION

We found lower representation of OA, women, AP, AI, Hispanic vs the U.S. cancer population, higher representation of AA vs U.S. cancer population and oncology clinical trials. Multifaceted efforts are underway to reduce disparities in cancer clinical trials at the NCI-CC.

Localized high-risk prostate cancer harbors an androgen receptor low subpopulation susceptible to HER2 inhibition

Patients diagnosed with localized high-risk prostate cancer have higher rates of recurrence, and the introduction of neoadjuvant intensive hormonal therapies seeks to treat occult micrometastatic disease by their addition to definitive treatment. Sufficient profiling of baseline disease has remained a challenge in enabling the in-depth assessment of phenotypes associated with exceptional vs. poor pathologic responses after treatment. In this study, we report comprehensive and integrative gene expression profiling of 37 locally advanced prostate tumors prior to six months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus the androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor enzalutamide prior to radical prostatectomy. A robust transcriptional program associated with HER2 activity was positively associated with poor outcome and opposed AR activity, even after adjusting for common genomic alterations in prostate cancer including PTEN loss and expression of the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion. Patients experiencing exceptional pathologic responses demonstrated lower levels of HER2 and phospho-HER2 by immunohistochemistry of biopsy tissues. The inverse correlation of AR and HER2 activity was found to be a universal feature of all aggressive prostate tumors, validated by transcriptional profiling an external cohort of 121 patients and immunostaining of tumors from 84 additional patients. Importantly, the AR activity-low, HER2 activity-high cells that resist ADT are a pre-existing subset of cells that can be targeted by HER2 inhibition alone or in combination with enzalutamide. In summary, we show that prostate tumors adopt an AR activity-low prior to antiandrogen exposure that can be exploited by treatment with HER2 inhibitors.

Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Combinations in First-Line Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Increasing Toxicity With Unclear Benefits

Positive phase III trials are not truly practice changing if they do not accurately inform on the best options for patients

Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are a standard-of-care (SoC) treatment option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Several clinical trials have shown the potential of combining PARPi with other anticancer agents. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARPi in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched on March 22nd, 2023, for phase 2 or 3 clinical trials. Efficacy (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], PSA decline >50% [PSA50], and objective response rate [ORR]) and safety outcomes were assessed in the included studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen clinical trials (PARPi monotherapy [n = 7], PARPi + androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors [ARSI] [n = 6], and PARPi + immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICI] [n = 4]) were included in the quantitative analyses. PARPi monotherapy improved radiographic PFS and OS over SoC in mCRPC patients with alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes but not in those with alterations in the ATM gene. Higher rates of PSA50 and ORR were reported in participants treated with PARPi + ARSI than in single-agent PARPi or PARPi + ICI. Although the rate of high-grade adverse events was similar across all groups, treatment discontinuation was higher in patients treated with PARPi-based combinations than PARPi monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of PARPi is not uniform across mCRPC patients with alterations in DNA damage repair genes, and optimal patient selection remains a clinical challenge. No unexpected safety signals for this class of agents emerged from this analysis.

Comparison of Large Language Models in Answering Immuno-Oncology Questions: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

The capability of large language models (LLMs) to understand and generate human-readable text has prompted the investigation of their potential as educational and management tools for cancer patients and healthcare providers.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study aimed at evaluating the ability of ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5, and Google Bard to answer questions related to four domains of immuno-oncology (Mechanisms, Indications, Toxicities, and Prognosis). We generated 60 open-ended questions (15 for each section). Questions were manually submitted to LLMs, and responses were collected on June 30th, 2023. Two reviewers evaluated the answers independently.

Results

ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 answered all questions, whereas Google Bard answered only 53.3% (p <0.0001). The number of questions with reproducible answers was higher for ChatGPT-4 (95%) and ChatGPT3.5 (88.3%) than for Google Bard (50%) (p <0.0001). In terms of accuracy, the number of answers deemed fully correct were 75.4%, 58.5%, and 43.8% for ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5, and Google Bard, respectively (p = 0.03). Furthermore, the number of responses deemed highly relevant was 71.9%, 77.4%, and 43.8% for ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5, and Google Bard, respectively (p = 0.04). Regarding readability, the number of highly readable was higher for ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 (98.1%) and (100%) compared to Google Bard (87.5%) (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 are potentially powerful tools in immuno-oncology, whereas Google Bard demonstrated relatively poorer performance. However, the risk of inaccuracy or incompleteness in the responses was evident in all three LLMs, highlighting the importance of expert-driven verification of the outputs returned by these technologies.

Applications of large language models in cancer care: current evidence and future perspectives

The development of large language models (LLMs) is a recent success in the field of generative artificial intelligence (AI). They are computer models able to perform a wide range of natural language processing tasks, including content generation, question answering, or language translation. In recent months, a growing number of studies aimed to assess their potential applications in the field of medicine, including cancer care. In this mini review, we described the present published evidence for using LLMs in oncology. All the available studies assessed ChatGPT, an advanced language model developed by OpenAI, alone or compared to other LLMs, such as Google Bard, Chatsonic, and Perplexity. Although ChatGPT could provide adequate information on the screening or the management of specific solid tumors, it also demonstrated a significant error rate and a tendency toward providing obsolete data. Therefore, an accurate, expert-driven verification process remains mandatory to avoid the potential for misinformation and incorrect evidence. Overall, although this new generative AI-based technology has the potential to revolutionize the field of medicine, including that of cancer care, it will be necessary to develop rules to guide the application of these tools to maximize benefits and minimize risks.

Relugolix in Clinical Practice: The Best Route for All?

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been a mainstay of prostate cancer treatment for decades. Relugolix was FDA-approved in 2020 and is currently the only ADT option via an oral route. While the opportunity to use an oral medication for this indication has some advantages, a balanced discussion is required to understand in what clinical settings this agent truly has benefit over long-acting injectable formulations of ADT. Furthermore, patient preference, compliance, financial toxicity, and perhaps most importantly, pharmacologic characteristics must be considered.

Flutamide With or Without PROSTVAC in Non-metastatic Castration Resistant (M0) Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Before 2018, there was no standard of care for non-metastatic (M0) castration resistant prostate cancer nmCRPC. Androgen receptor antagonists (ARAs) were commonly used sequentially nmCRPC.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing the ARA flutamide+/-PROSTVAC, a pox viral vaccine targeting PSA that includes T-cell co-stimulatory molecules. Eligible men had negative CT and Tc99 bone scans, and rising PSA on ADT. Previous treatment with ARA was a stratification factor. Patients were also evaluated for antigen-specific immune responses using intracellular cytokine staining.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients randomized to flutamide and 31 to flutamide+vaccine. The median age was 71.8 and 69.8 years, respectively. The median time to treatment failure after a median potential follow-up of 46.7 months was, 4.5 months (range 2-70) for flutamide alone vs. 6.9 months (2.5-40; P = .38) with flutamide+vaccine. Seven patients in each arm had a >50% PSA response. Antigen-specific responses were similar in both arms (58% of patients in flutamide alone and 56% in flutamide+vaccine). The treatments were well tolerated. The most common side effect > grade 2 was injection site reaction seen in 29/31 vaccine patients which were self-limiting.

CONCLUSION

The combination of flutamide+PROSTVAC did not improve outcomes in men with nmCRPC compared with flutamide alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00450463).

Avelumab in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, Enriched for Patients Treated Previously With a Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine

Therapeutic cancer vaccines including sipuleucel- T , a prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) targeted vaccine that improves survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), can produce immune responses that translate to clinical benefit. The effects of sequential checkpoint inhibitors after therapeutic vaccine on immune responses are unknown. Avelumab is an anti-programmed death ligand-1 monoclonal antibody evaluated in patients with mCRPC in the JAVELIN solid tumor phase 1 trial expansion cohort, enriched for patients with a previous therapeutic prostate cancer-targeted vaccine. mCRPC patients received intravenous avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks with imaging every 6 weeks. Peripheral blood T-cell responses to PAP and to PA2024, the peptide containing PAP utilized by the vaccine, were evaluated pre and posttreatment. Eighteen patients enrolled, and previous treatments included abiraterone or enzalutamide in 14 (78%), therapeutic cancer vaccine in 14 (78%), and chemotherapy in 4 (22%). Avelumab had a manageable safety profile. There were no sustained prostate specific antigen decreases. Of 17 patients evaluable for best overall response by RECISTv1.1, 12 had stable disease (SD) and 5 had progressive disease. Seven patients had SD for >24 weeks posttreatment. Fourteen patients had previously received therapeutic cancer vaccines. Eleven (79%) had SD as the best overall response. Of these 14 patients, 9 had previously received sipuleucel T . Analysis of antigen-specific T-cell responses pre and postavelumab treatment did not demonstrate changes in interferon-γ production or proliferation in response to PAP or PA2024. This unplanned analysis does not support the use of sequential therapeutic cancer vaccine therapy followed by programmed death ligand-1 inhibition in mCRPC.

Emerging treatment options for prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer treatment has rapidly evolved in the last few years. Androgen deprivation therapy has been the backbone of treatment for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer but incremental benefits in survival has been shown by adding androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) across various spectrums of disease state. In addition, docetaxel chemotherapy remains the first-line chemotherapy regimen available with survival benefits shown with triplet therapy in those who are chemotherapy-eligible. However, disease progression remains inevitable and novel agents such as radioligand therapy with lutetium have shown improvement in survival.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the pivotal trials that led to the US FDA approval of agents utilized in metastatic prostate cancer and explores the use of novel agents including PSMA-targeting agents, radioligands, cell-based therapy, CAR-T, BiTE, and antibody drug conjugates.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment landscape for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has evolved beyond additional agents with ARPI and/or docetaxel, including other treatments with sipuleucel-T, radium, cabazitaxel, PARP inhibitors, and lutetium, which have specific indications and role in sequencing. Novel therapies remain critically needed after progression from lutetium.

Abstract 957: Prediction of patient response to targeted and immunotherapies from the tumor transcriptome in a wide set of indications and clinical trials

Background: Precision oncology is gradually advancing into mainstream clinical practice, demonstrating significant survival benefits. However, eligibility and response rates remain limited in many cases, calling for better predictive biomarkers.

Methods: We present ENLIGHT, a transcriptomics-based computational approach that identifies clinically relevant genetic interactions and uses them to predict a patient’s response to a variety of therapies in multiple cancer types, importantly, without training on previous treatment response data. Consequently, in addition to its ability to predict patients' response to approved and well-studied therapies, ENLIGHT can predict the response to new treatments in early development, even before clinical data has accumulated. Accordingly, we study ENLIGHT in two translationally relevant scenarios: Personalized Oncology (PO), aimed at prioritizing approved treatments to a given patient, and Clinical Trial Design (CTD), selecting the subset of most likely responders in a patient cohort.

Results: Evaluating ENLIGHT’s performance on 21 blinded clinical trial datasets spanning 11 indications and 15 different drugs in the PO setting, we show that it can effectively predict a patient’s treatment response across multiple therapies and cancer types, with an overall odds ratio of 2.59 (p=3.41e-8), and a 36% increase in response rate over the baseline (p=3.30e-13). Its prediction accuracy is better than other state-of-the-art transcriptomics-based signatures. Unlike most signatures that are prognostic or provide insights for only very few, specific treatments, ENLIGHT provides matching scores to a broad range of treatments. Quite strikingly, its performance is comparable to that of supervised predictors developed for specific indications and drugs. In combination with the IFN-γ signature, ENLIGHT achieves an odds ratio larger than 4 in predicting response to immune checkpoint therapy. In the CTD scenario, our results show that by excluding non-responders ENLIGHT can enhance clinical trial success for immunotherapies and other monoclonal antibodies, achieving &gt; 90% of the response rate attainable under an optimal exclusion strategy.

Conclusion: ENLIGHT is a powerful transcriptomics-based precision oncology pipeline developed by Pangea Biomed that broadly predicts response to both extant and novel targeted and immune therapies, going beyond context-specific biomarkers.

Citation Format: Gal Dinstag, Eldad D. Shulman, Efrat Elis, Doreen S. Ben-Zvi, Omer Tirosh, Eden Maimon, Isaac Meilijson, Emmanuel Elalouf, Boris Temkin, Philipp Vitkovsky, Eyal Schiff, Danh-Tai Hoang, Sanju Sinha, Nishanth Ulhas Nair, Joo Sang-Lee, Alejandro A. Schäffer, Ze'ev Ronai, Dejan Juric, Andrea B. Apolo, William L. Dahut, Stanley Lipkowitz, Raanan Berger, Razelle Kurzrock, Antonios Papanicolau-Sengos, Fatima Karzai, Mark R. Gilbert, Kenneth Aldape, Padma S. Rajagopal, Tuvik Beker, Eytan Ruppin, Ranit Aharonov. Prediction of patient response to targeted and immunotherapies from the tumor transcriptome in a wide set of indications and clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 957.

Metformin for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: Immune data from a phase 2 study

377

Background: Metformin impacts immune response in several ways. It protects CD8 TILs from apoptotic death, downregulates CD39 and CD73, reduces MDSC activity and suppresses the transcription of PD1 thus enhancing CD8+ T cell antitumor activity (Ma et al, 2000, Nature). There is limited data on the immunologic impact of metformin treatment in hormone sensitive prostate cancer. Methods: We conducted an open label, randomized, phase II trial of bicalutamide with or without metformin of patients with high risk, biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (NCT02614859). Patients were randomized 1:2 to observation for an initial 8 weeks or metformin 1000 mg twice daily. Bicalutamide 50 mg/day was added after 8 weeks to both arms. The study discontinued accrual after interim analysis indicated no difference in PSA at 32 weeks between the two arms; however, metformin monotherapy for 8 weeks induced modest PSA declines observed in 40% of patients. Here we report immune responses in a subgroup of patients (N=12), including systemic cytokine levels and 158 circulating immune cell subsets after 8 weeks of metformin monotherapy. Results: Twelve patients treated at the NCI were analyzed. After 8 weeks, the metformin arm showed increased pDCs and lower Tregs compared to baseline. Significant differences in the percent change of immune parameters after 8 weeks of metformin monotherapy compared to 8 weeks of observation are summarized. Conclusions: Metformin has been shown to reduce markers of immune exhaustion in hormone sensitive prostate cancer which is supported by a greater reduction of PD-1+ and Tim3+ NK cells. Additional immune changes included increases in activated subpopulations of natural killer (NK) cells, which have been reported as a potential predictive biomarker of prolonged treatment response to hormone therapy in prostate cancer (Pasero et al, Oncotarget, 2015). Clinical trial information: NCT02614859 . [Table: see text]

Inherited risk for prostate cancer (PCa): Following the natural history of men with high-risk genetics using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)

390

Background: PCa has inherited risk factors including high genetic risk variants such as BRCA1/2, HOXB13, and DNA mismatch repair genes. mpMRI has been shown to be effective for detection and staging of localized PCa. This study follows participants (prts), born biologically male, without a diagnosis of PCa with known germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV) in BRCA1/2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM, HOXB13, ATM, NBN, TP53, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C/D, BRIP1, or FANCA-FANCM (NCT03805919). Methods: Up to 500 eligible prts 30-75 years old (yo) with a documented germline PV will enroll. Prts undergo biennial clinical exam and mpMRI, and annual PSA monitoring and are followed at 12-month intervals to determine PSA, prostate cancer diagnosis, and/or disease/survival status until death. Indication for prostate biopsy includes clinical or imaging findings. Biopsy specimens undergo molecular analyses. Results: To date, 175 prts have been enrolled: 169 (97%) White, 3 Hispanic (2%), 1 African American (1%), 1 Asian (1%), and 1 biethnic (1%). Median age is 47 yo. The most common monoallelic PV are: 48.6% BRCA2, 25.1% BRCA1, 6.3% CHEK2 and 5.7% MSH2. PVs in ATM, PALB2, HOXB13, PMS2, MLH1, MSH6, BRIP1, EPCAM and RAD51D are ≤4%. One subject carries three distinct PVs ( BRCA2, CHEK2, BRIP1). Indication for biopsy was found in 26.3% of prts with 22/46 (47.8%) with a PIRADS 4 lesion, 6/46 (13.0%) PIRADS 3 lesion, 12/46 (26.1%) elevated PSA (median=2.8 ng/mL) or 6/46 (13.0%) due to clinical discretion. Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed on 13/39 (33.3%) biopsies with median age at diagnosis=59 yo. 9/13 (69%) prts had a PSA <3 ng/ml at diagnosis. Nine prts were diagnosed with ISUP Grade Group (GG) 1, 3 with GG2, and 1 with GG3. Eight prts opted for active surveillance (AS), 2 for radiation therapy (RT), and 3 for prostatectomy (RP). Two prts on AS converted to definitive treatment (one RP and one RT) due to progression in GG on the year 1 AS biopsy. Conclusions: mpMRI screening in men with germline PV can be used for diagnosis and monitoring of PCa and facilitates detection below conventional PSA thresholds in a high genetic risk setting. Access to genetic testing and other variables need to be addressed in underrepresented minorities. Correlative studies, including cfDNA and PBMCs, are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03805919 . [Table: see text]

Effects of docetaxel on circulating immune cell subsets and association with outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

207

Background: Docetaxel with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been shown to improve survival in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). There is limited data on the immunologic effects of docetaxel in mCSPC. Greater knowledge of the immune impact of docetaxel could inform future trials in prostate cancer. Methods: A clinical trial in mCSPC evaluated sequencing docetaxel and ADT with Prostvac, a poxviral vaccine targeting prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Eligibility criteria included mCSPC within 4 months of ADT and ECOG performance status 0-2. Patients given 6 cycles of docetaxel 75mg/m2 with ADT alone for mCSPC were included in this analysis. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were sampled at baseline and at 3 weeks after commencing docetaxel. Immune cell subsets analyzed included CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, T regulatory cells (Tregs), natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells (DCs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Analyses were performed to determine if the baseline immune status or immune changes induced by therapy associate with PSA at 2 years. Results: Fifteen patients were evaluated for peripheral immune responses in this study. Median age was 63 years (range 50-73). Fourteen were white and 1 was black. ECOG performance status was 0 in 11 patients, 1 in 4 patients. Disease volume was high in 7 and low in 8 patients. Among 158 immune cell subsets assessed, only changes in Tregs and activated NK cells with a lytic and cytokine producing phenotype (CD16+ CD56br) were noted after initiation of docetaxel in addition to ADT. Patients with PSA ≤0.2 at 2 years had higher baseline frequencies of total CD4+ T cells, several activated CD4+ T-cell subsets, plasmacytoid DCs, and CD49d- Tregs. They also had lower baseline frequencies of total CD8+ T cells, naïve CD8+ T cells, and CD73+CD8+ T-cells. Patients with PSA ≤0.2 at 2 years also had greater percent increases in CD8+ effector memory (EM) PD-1+ T-cells after treatment. Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate increases in activated NK cells with lytic and cytokine producing potential after treatment with docetaxel. Given that NK cells are associated with clinical outcomes in prostate cancer (Zhao SG, JNCI, 2019) and that increased NK cells were seen after treatment with enzalutamide as well (Madan, JITC, 2021), developing immunotherapy combinations to capitalize on NK cell activity may be a path forward for developing immunotherapy in prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02649855 . [Table: see text]

Clinically oriented prediction of patient response to targeted and immunotherapies from the tumor transcriptome

BACKGROUND

Precision oncology is gradually advancing into mainstream clinical practice, demonstrating significant survival benefits. However, eligibility and response rates remain limited in many cases, calling for better predictive biomarkers.

METHODS

We present ENLIGHT, a transcriptomics-based computational approach that identifies clinically relevant genetic interactions and uses them to predict a patient's response to a variety of therapies in multiple cancer types without training on previous treatment response data. We study ENLIGHT in two translationally oriented scenarios: personalized oncology (PO), aimed at prioritizing treatments for a single patient, and clinical trial design (CTD), selecting the most likely responders in a patient cohort.

FINDINGS

Evaluating ENLIGHT's performance on 21 blinded clinical trial datasets in the PO setting, we show that it can effectively predict a patient's treatment response across multiple therapies and cancer types. Its prediction accuracy is better than previously published transcriptomics-based signatures and is comparable with that of supervised predictors developed for specific indications and drugs. In combination with the interferon-γ signature, ENLIGHT achieves an odds ratio larger than 4 in predicting response to immune checkpoint therapy. In the CTD scenario, ENLIGHT can potentially enhance clinical trial success for immunotherapies and other monoclonal antibodies by excluding non-responders while overall achieving more than 90% of the response rate attainable under an optimal exclusion strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

ENLIGHT demonstrably enhances the ability to predict therapeutic response across multiple cancer types from the bulk tumor transcriptome.

FUNDING

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program, NIH and by the Israeli Innovation Authority.

First-line pembrolizumab plus androgen deprivation therapy for locally advanced microsatellite instability-high prostate cancer in a patient with Muir-Torre syndrome: A case report

The risks of development of colorectal and endometrial cancers in individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are well known and have been widely studied. In recent years, the potential association of other malignancies, including prostate cancer, with LS has been considered. Decision-making regarding screening for prostate cancer in the generalized population can be complicated; accounting for the possibility of a higher risk of cancer conferred by a potential genetic predisposition confounds the creation of salient guidelines even further. Although tissue-agnostic treatment approvals have been granted to several immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for their use in the treatment of subsets of patients whose tumors exhibit high levels of microsatellite instability or high tumor mutational burden, a paucity of data exists regarding the use of ICIs in the first line treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer harboring these features. A significant reduction in tumor volume in response to the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition and androgen deprivation therapy is described in this report of a male with Muir-Torre syndrome who was found to have locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate. While anecdotal, the anti-tumor activity of this combination of therapy is notable and calls attention to the importance of considering further investigation of the use of immune checkpoint blockade as a primary therapeutic option in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Deciphering the enigma of neuroendocrine prostate cancer

Despite the clinical advances in managing metastatic prostate cancer in the last 20 years, treatments for patients with metastatic disease only offer a brief respite from disease progression, especially after first-line therapies. Research into treatment resistance has defined a subset of patients with neuroendocrine differentiation of their prostate adenocarcinoma. Although neuroendocrine findings in conjunction with prostate adenocarcinoma can be seen in pathology samples at all stages of disease, the neuroendocrine variant of prostate cancer associated with poor outcomes occurs in approximately 20% of men with advanced disease. In this issue of JCI, Zhao, Sperger, and colleagues present data for a promising biomarker platform that can detect neuroendocrine prostate cancer after serial sampling of patients' blood with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. This assay will be tested in several current and future trials to better define its potential clinical role and perhaps provide a greater understanding of neuroendocrine prostate cancer itself.

A Single-arm Phase II Study Combining NLG207, a Nanoparticle Camptothecin, with Enzalutamide in Advanced Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Post-Enzalutamide

BACKGROUND

Despite the clinical efficacy of enzalutamide monotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer, therapeutic resistance and disease progression are inevitable. We proposed a study to evaluate NLG207, a nanoparticle-drug conjugate (NDC) of the potent topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin, in combination with enzalutamide, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following progression on enzalutamide.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, optimal two-stage, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of NLG207 in combination with enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC who received prior enzalutamide. A lead-in dose escalation evaluated the recommended phase 2 dose of NLG207 in combination with enzalutamide. Patients received NLG207 via IV infusion every 2 weeks and enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily.

RESULTS

Between March 2019 and June 2021, four patients were accrued to the lead-in dose escalation. Two of the four patients were evaluable and both experienced DLTs at the NLG207 12 mg/m2 dose level; one DLT was related to a dose delay for noninfective cystitis and myelosuppression, the other a grade 3 noninfective cystitis. Further evaluation of NLG207 in combination with enzalutamide was halted and the study was ultimately terminated. PSA declines from baseline were observed in two patients.

CONCLUSION

NLG207 12 mg/m2 in combination with enzalutamide was not well tolerated in patients with mCRPC following several lines of the standard of care therapy.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03531827.

Assessment of Androgen Receptor Splice Variant-7 as a Biomarker of Clinical Response in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Therapies targeting the androgen receptor (AR) have improved the outcome for patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC). Expression of the constitutively active AR splice variant-7 (AR-V7) has shown clinical utility as a predictive biomarker of AR-targeted therapy resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), but its importance in CSPC remains understudied.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We assessed different approaches to quantify AR-V7 mRNA and protein in prostate cancer cell lines, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, publicly available cohorts, and independent institutional clinical cohorts, to identify reliable approaches for detecting AR-V7 mRNA and protein and its association with clinical outcome.

RESULTS

In CSPC and CRPC cohorts, AR-V7 mRNA was much less abundant when detected using reads across splice boundaries than when considering isoform-specific exonic reads. The RM7 AR-V7 antibody had increased sensitivity and specificity for AR-V7 protein detection by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in CRPC cohorts but rarely identified AR-V7 protein reactivity in CSPC cohorts, when compared with the EPR15656 AR-V7 antibody. Using multiple CRPC PDX models, we demonstrated that AR-V7 expression was exquisitely sensitive to hormonal manipulation. In CSPC institutional cohorts, AR-V7 protein quantification by either assay was associated neither with time to development of castration resistance nor with overall survival, and intense neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy did not lead to significant AR-V7 mRNA or staining following treatment. Neither pre- nor posttreatment AR-V7 levels were associated with volumes of residual disease after therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that further analytical validation and clinical qualification are required before AR-V7 can be considered for clinical use in CSPC as a predictive biomarker.

Signaling new therapeutic opportunities: cytokines in prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite FDA approval of sipuleucel-T in 2010, endeavors to use immune checkpoint inhibitors in unselected prostate cancer patients have not improved clinical outcomes. These efforts include studies with anti-PD1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 alone and in combination with existing standards of care. These strategies are generally T-cell centric and disregard the broader complex and pleiotropic components of the prostate cancer tumor microenvironment such as natural killer cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor associated macrophages.

AREAS COVERED

We performed an online literature search and undertook a review of existing pre-clinical and clinical literature for cytokine-based therapy relating to prostate cancer, specifically on interleukin (IL)-2, IL-15, IL-12, IL-23, IL-8 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β.

EXPERT OPINION

Cytokine-based therapies present an alternative immune strategy to target the pleiotropic prostate cancer tumor microenvironment beyond T-cells. Future immunotherapy strategies in prostate cancer should address these immune cell populations which may play more important roles in the prostate cancer tumor microenvironment.

Combining IL-12 immunocytokine (M9241) with docetaxel in metastatic prostate cancer: A phase I study

e17033

Background: M9241 is an immunocytokine that targets single- and double-stranded DNA which allows the treatment to localize IL-12 to necrotic tumor (Xu, CCR 2017). M9241 was well-tolerated as a monotherapy in a Phase I study with solid tumors (Strauss J, CCR 2019). Additional preclinical data has demonstrated synergy of M9241 with cytotoxic therapy. This is the first study to examine the safety of a novel combination of chemotherapy and immunocytokines in metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: This safety analysis included patients with mCSPC or mCRPC. Patients were enrolled in a 2-dose level (DL) escalation cohort of M9241 (DL 1: 12mcg/kg, DL 2: 16.8mcg/kg) combined with docetaxel (75mg/m2) with 6 patients planned per DL. A third DL of 8mcg/kg will enroll 6 more patients after the 16.8mcg/kg DL has fully enrolled. All patients were treated with ADT. Patients were initiated on treatment with docetaxel with a plan for mCSPC patients to receive six 3-week cycles of combined treatment and mCRPC patients to continue until progression or unacceptable toxicity. M9241 was given starting with the second cycle of treatment for each patient. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated in the first 6 weeks after start of docetaxel (from cycle 1 day 1 through the end of the first cycle with M9241). Results: The study has enrolled 10 patients out of a planned 18 for the safety portion. Age range is 58-82 with a median of 69 years. Race distribution is 80% White and 20% Black. Gleason scores for patients were 8 (40%), 9 (40%), and 10 (20%). No DLTs were seen with either dose-level. Only 1 patient had a Grade 4 AE, neutropenia. Grade 3 toxicities included anemia, diarrhea, leukopenia, and hypotension (each occurring in 10% of the patients). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) of any grade were anemia (40%) and lymphopenia (40%), followed by fatigue (30%), diarrhea (20%), and fever (20%). Conclusions: We established a safe dose-level of M9241 at ≥ 12mcg/kg. Updated clinical data from the safety cohort (n = 18) will be presented. This demonstrates that an immunocytokine and chemotherapy can be safely combined for treatment in metastatic prostate cancer. Two planned expansion cohorts will evaluate docetaxel and M9241 in mCSPC and mCRPC, respectively. Clinical trial information: NCT04633252.

ENLIGHT: Pancancer response prediction to targeted and immunotherapies via tumor transcriptomics

e13556

Background: Precision oncology is gradually advancing into mainstream clinical practice. Despite the significant recent growth in the number of approved biomarkers for immune and targeted therapies, demonstrating significant survival benefits, eligibility and response rates remain limited in many cases, calling for better predictive biomarkers. Methods: We developed ENLIGHT - a transcriptomics-based computational platform that identifies and utilizes clinically relevant genetic interactions (GIs) to predict a patient’s response to cancer treatments. ENLIGHT markedly extends and improves upon SELECT, a previous GI-based framework for obtaining transcriptomics-based response biomarkers. In this study, we focus on three key translational aspects: (i) the number of drugs for which predictions can be obtained (ii) defining a biomarker-based test for Personalized Medicine (PM) that would identify favorable treatments for an individual; and (iii) Improving clinical trial design by excluding a sub-population of patients likely not to respond to the treatment. A key translational feature of the approach is that it does not require training on treatment response data. Thus, in addition to its ability to predict patients' response to approved and well-studied therapies, it can predict the response to new, unexplored treatments. Results: We first tested Enlight in the PM scenario, analyzing 21 patient cohorts from diverse indications, treated with a variety of targeted and immunotherapies. The ENLIGHT treatment matching score is associated with better response with an aggregate Odds Ratio (OR) of 2.59 (95% confidence interval [1.85, 3.55], p= 3.41 e-8). Applied to the WINTHER trial data, encompassing multiple indications and individualized treatments, ENLIGHT recommendations achieved a highly remarkable OR of 11.15 ([2.3, 54.5], p = 8 e-04), demonstrating ENLIGHT’s strong predictive power across a broad spectrum of treatments and cancer types. Second, using ENLIGHT to exclude patients from clinical trials increases the trial response rate, achieving more than 90% of the response rate attainable under an optimal exclusion strategy. Conclusions: ENLIGHT is a powerful transcriptomics-based precision oncology pipeline developed by Pangea Biomed that broadly predicts response to both extant and novel targeted and immune therapies in translationally oriented, clinical terms, going beyond case-specific biomarkers.

PSMA PET findings in patients with undetectable PSA more than 3 years after docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC)

e17046

Background: Multiple treatment options combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) provide a survival advantage in mCSPC. In this prospective study, mCSPC patients were treated with docetaxel and Prostvac, a therapeutic cancer vaccine. Since initiation of the study, a phase 3 trial of Prostvac did not show independent clinical activity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Still, this study offers a chance to evaluate responses to docetaxel-based therapy in mCSPC. More specifically, with FDA approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging in just the last year, there is a paucity of data regarding the use of this scan in long-term responders to therapies for mCSPC. Methods: Eligible patients included those with mCSPC and ECOG PS of ≤ 2. As per the CHAARTED regimen, patients started docetaxel within 4 months of initiating ADT with a plan to receive 75mg/m2 for 6 cycles. Patients were randomized to receive Prostvac prior to, concurrent with, or after docetaxel. Restaging was done annually with CT and Tc99 bone scan. The study was powered to evaluate immune responses, which is being reported separately. For this analysis, patients were evaluated as one group. Ten patients are in follow up with continued PSA values of ≤ 0.2 ng/mL and 7/10 were evaluated with 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET. Results: Seventy-three patients enrolled. Median age was 63 years with a range of 41-86 years. Race distribution was 71.6% White, 20.3% Black, 4.1% other, and 4.1% unknown. Gleason 6, 7, and 8 to 10 was 4.1%, 21.6%, and 68.9% of patients, respectively, with 5.4% being unknown. Median pre-ADT PSA was 34.75 ng/mL. Low-volume disease represented 41.1% of patients and high-volume was 58.9%. After 2 years from the start of ADT, 22% of patients had PSA values of ≤ 0.2 ng/mL. This included 37% of the low-volume group and 12% of the high-volume group. Three years from starting ADT, 14% of patients had PSA values ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (20% of the low-volume group, 9% of the high-volume group). Of the 7 patients who remain in follow-up with PSA values ≤ 0.2 ng/mL and who were evaluated with PSMA PET, median time from start of ADT was 4 years with a range of 3.5-6 years. These patients either had no evidence of disease or minimal residual findings on CT/Tc99 bone scan. Four of the 7 patients still had residual areas of uptake on PSMA PET. Conclusions: Patients treated with docetaxel for mCSPC have the potential for long-term clinical responses. In these long-term responders, despite prolonged PSA response and minimal findings on conventional CT and Tc99 scans, more than half of patients still had findings on PSMA PET imaging. Further studies are required to better understand the clinical implications of these findings and the role of PSMA PET in mCSPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02649855.

Phase II evaluation of the combination of PDS0101, M9241, and bintrafusp alfa in patients with HPV 16+ malignancies

2518

Background: More than 630,000 cases of HPV related cancer occur worldwide annually. About 15-20% of cases respond to PD-(L)1 inhibitors and about 30% respond to dual PD-L1/TGF-β blockade including 10% of checkpoint refractory pts, but for the majority of pts with checkpoint refractory disease there is no effective standard therapy. Preclinical studies show that the combination of PDS0101, a therapeutic vaccine targeting HPV 16 E6/E7, M9241, a tumor-targeting IL-12 immunocytokine, and bintrafusp alfa (BA), a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, resulted in maximum T cell infiltration and tumor reduction compared to any 1 or 2 of these agents alone. Prior clinical data suggests that the combination is preferentially active in HPV 16+ disease. Methods: 30 pts with advanced HPV 16+ cancer were treated with PDS0101, M9241 and BA (NCT04287868). Pts received BA at 1200 mg IV q2wks, M9241 at 16.8 mcg/kg SC q4wks or 8 mcg/kg SC q2wks, and PDS0101 as two 0.5 ml SC injections q4wks. Dose reductions or skipped doses for toxicities of BA and M9241 were allowed. 5 pts had surgical resection of tumor for disease control and were censored for PD but not survival. Results: 30 pts (9 cervical, 2 vaginal/vulvar, 6 anal, 13 oropharyngeal) were treated. 13/30 had grade 3 treatment related AEs including grade 3 anemia in 9 pts associated with grade 3 hematuria in 3 pts and grade 3 GI bleeding in 3 pts. 2 pts had grade 3 AST/ALT elevation. Grade 3 flu like symptoms and grade 3 hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis were each seen in 1 pt. One pt had grade 3 lymphopenia/leukopenia plus grade 4 neutropenia and one pt had grade 4 AST/ALT elevation. There were no grade 5 treatment related AEs. 7/8 (88%) pts with checkpoint naïve disease had objective responses (OR) including 1 delayed response after initial PD with 4/7 (57%) responses ongoing (median 17 months follow up). 10/22 (45%) with checkpoint refractory disease have had disease reduction including 6/22 (27%) with OR and 4/6 (67%) responses ongoing (median 12 months follow up). 6/8 (75%) pts with checkpoint naïve disease and 17/22 (77%) pts with checkpoint refractory disease are alive after a median of 17 and 12 months follow up respectively. For checkpoint refractory pts, M9241 dosing appears to affect response rates. 5/8 (63%) pts receiving M9241 at 16.8 mcg/kg had an OR compared to 1/14 (7%) who received M9241 at 8 mcg/kg with an OR. However, despite differences in response rates with higher vs lower M9241 dose, survival outcomes were similar irrespective of M9241 dose (p = 0.99 by Kaplan Meier analysis). Conclusions: The combination of PDS0101, M9241 and BA appears to have a manageable safety profile along with early evidence of clinical activity for pts with checkpoint naïve and refractory advanced HPV 16+ cancer. Moreover, growing data suggest that all 3 drugs in the combination contribute to the encouraging outcomes being observed. Clinical trial information: NCT04287868.

A randomized phase 2 study of bicalutamide with or without metformin for biochemical recurrence in overweight or obese prostate cancer patients (BIMET-1)

BACKGROUND

Metformin may have anticancer effects that are independent of its hypoglycemic effects. Retrospective studies have shown that metformin use is associated with decreased incidence of prostate cancer and prostate cancer-specific mortality. Preclinical studies suggesting additive anticancer effects of combining metformin and bicalutamide prompted this clinical trial (NCT02614859).

METHODS

This open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial enrolled non-diabetic patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer, a PSADT of 3-9 months, BMI > 25 and normal testosterone. Patients were randomized 1:2 to observation for an initial 8 weeks (Arm A) or metformin 1000 mg twice daily (Arm B). Bicalutamide 50 mg/day was added after 8 weeks to both arms. The primary objective was to evaluate the number of patients with undetectable PSA ( < 0.2 ng/mL) at the end of 32 weeks. Immune correlatives were assessed as exploratory endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were enrolled from March 2015 to January 2020. No difference was seen between the 2 arms in the proportion of patients with undetectable PSA. Modest PSA decrease ranging from 4% to 24% were seen in 40.0% (95% CI: 19.1-64.0%) of patients with metformin monotherapy, compared to 11.1% (95% CI: 0.3-48.3%) in the observation arm. Metformin monotherapy reduced PD-1+ NK cells, and increased NKG2D+ NK cells. The combination of metformin and bicalutamide led to greater reductions in PD-1 expressing NK, CD4+ T, and CD8+ T-cell subsets compared to bicalutamide alone. The trial was stopped early due to predicted inability to achieve its primary endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

Although metformin plus bicalutamide was well tolerated, there was no improvement in rates of achieving undetectable PSA at 32 weeks. Metformin monotherapy induced modest PSA declines in 40% of patients after 8 weeks. Metformin, given alone and in combination with bicalutamide, displayed immune modifying effects, primarily within NK and T cells subsets.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial Registration Number: NCT02614859.

Evaluating the optimal sequence of immunotherapy and docetaxel in men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

130

Background: Docetaxel is a standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). PROSTVAC is a pox viral-based therapeutic cancer vaccine encoding for PSA and three T-cell co-stimulatory molecules. Pox viral-based vaccines had previously demonstrated potential immune synergy with docetaxel. This clinical trial evaluated the optimal sequence of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in mCSPC. Methods: Key eligibility criteria were mCSPC within 4 months of ADT and ECOG performance status 0-2. Patients were randomized between Arms A (6 cycles of docetaxel 75mg/m2 followed by 6 doses of PROSTVAC) and B (docetaxel concurrent with PROSTVAC). After rapid accrual to the first 2 arms, Arm C was added by protocol amendment (6 doses of PROSTVAC prior to 6 cycles of docetaxel). ADT was continued throughout the treatment period. The primary endpoint was to evaluate antigen-specific responses to the tumor antigens, PSA and MUC1, and brachyury, a transcription factor implicated in the metastatic process, after patients completed their respective sequence of docetaxel and PROSTVAC. This was done using intracellular cytokine staining of 4 established markers in both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, for a total of 8 measures of activation per antigen. Results: The study enrolled 73 patients with a median age of 63 years (range 41-86). Gleason scores for patients were 6 (4.1%), 7 (21.6%) and 8-10 (68.9%), with 5.4% being unknown. Median pre-ADT PSA was 34.75 ng/mL. Per CHAARTED criteria, disease volume was low in 41.1% and high in 58.9% of patients. Numbers of patients evaluable for immune responses in arms A, B, and C were 16, 12 and 18, respectively. Clinical responses have previously been presented (Atiq, MO et al., ASCO 2021), with 22% of all patients having PSA <0.2 at 2 years. Conclusions: This data provides some insights into the potential of immune activating therapies in relation to chemotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. This preliminary analysis suggests the greatest magnitude of immune activation is seen when immunotherapy is followed by chemotherapy. Additional analysis of the breadth of immune responses and associations with clinical outcomes is ongoing and will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02649855. [Table: see text]

The immunocytokine M9241 in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa): Clinical and immune data from a phase 1 study

127

Background: Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a proinflammatory cytokine that plays a critical role in regulating the transition from innate to adaptive immunity but has toxicity with systemic administration. M9241 is an immunocytokine composed of 2 IL-12 heterodimers, each fused to one of the H-chains of the NHS76 antibody, which has affinity for both single and double stranded DNA. Thus, M9241 targets delivery to regions of tumor necrosis where DNA has become exposed. NCT01417546, a phase I trial of M9241 at escalating doses, established safety and dosing (Strauss J et al, CCR 2019). This was the first use of M9241 in human subjects with solid tumors including PCa. Methods: Nine patients (pts) with PCa enrolled in the phase 1 study, not all of which were presented previously. M9241 was given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (0.1-21.8mcg/kg) or every 2 weeks (12-16.8mcg/kg). PSA declines and immune responses were evaluated including systemic cytokine levels and 30 markers on 158 circulating immune cell subsets. Results: Nine PCa pts were treated with NHS-IL12 and 8 were evaluable for response, including 6 pts with biochemical recurrence and 2 with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (one patient discontinued the study treatment after 1 dose due to grade 3 elevation in ALT). There were no adverse events (AEs) of grade >4. Additional grade 3 toxicities included one each of: leukopenia, neutropenia and lymphopenia. The most common AEs of any grade were lymphopenia (77.8%), fatigue (55.6%), and ALT elevation (55.6%). 5 of 8 (62.5%) had PSA declines ranging from 8-42%. After treatment with M9241, evaluable pts had increases in systemic IL-10, TNF and INFg. Additional immune changes included increases in activated subpopulation of natural killer (NK) cells, consistent with the phase 1 experience. Conclusions: M9241 was found to be safe and well tolerated in PCa pts. PSA declines occurred in 5 of 8 evaluable pts. As with the phase 1 study, increases in NK subpopulations were seen in the small number of evaluable pts. These preliminary findings of a necrosis-targeting immunocytokine will be evaluated further in combination studies with cytotoxic therapy. M9241 is currently being evaluated in combination with docetaxel in metastatic prostate cancer (NCT04633252). Clinical trial information: NCT01417546.

Safety evaluation of M9241 in combination with docetaxel in metastatic prostate cancer

93

Background: M9241 is an immunocytokine that targets single- and double-stranded DNA which allows the treatment to localize IL-12 to necrotic tumor (Xu, CCR 2017). M9241 was well-tolerated as a monotherapy in a Phase I study with solid tumors (Strauss J, CCR 2019). Additional preclinical data has demonstrated synergy of M9241 with cytotoxic therapy. This is the first study to examine the safety of a novel combination of chemotherapy and immunocytokines in metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: This safety analysis included patients with mCSPC or mCRPC. Patients were enrolled in a 2-dose level (DL) escalation cohort of M9241 (DL 1: 12mcg/kg, DL 2: 16.8mcg/kg) combined with docetaxel (75mg/m2) with 6 patients planned per DL. A third DL of 8mcg/kg will enroll 6 more patients after the 16.8mcg/kg DL has fully enrolled. All patients were treated with ADT. Patients were initiated on treatment with docetaxel with a plan for mCSPC patients to receive six 3-week cycles of combined treatment and mCRPC patients to continue until progression or unacceptable toxicity. M9241 was given starting with the second cycle of treatment for each patient. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was evaluated in the first 6 weeks after start of docetaxel (from cycle 1 day 1 through the end of the first cycle with M9241). Results: The study has enrolled 10 patients out of a planned 18 for the safety portion. Age range is 58-82 with a median of 69 years. Race distribution is 80% White and 20% Black. Gleason scores for patients were 8 (40%), 9 (40%), and 10 (20%). No DLTs were seen with either dose-level. Only 1 patient had a Grade 4 AE, neutropenia. Grade 3 toxicities included anemia, diarrhea, leukopenia, and hypotension (each occurring in 10% of the patients). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) of any grade were anemia (40%) and lymphopenia (40%), followed by fatigue (30%), diarrhea (20%), and fever (20%). Conclusions: We established a safe dose-level of M9241 at ≥ 12mcg/kg. Updated clinical data from the safety cohort (n = 18) will be presented. This demonstrates that an immunocytokine and chemotherapy can be safely combined for treatment in metastatic prostate cancer. A planned expansion cohort will evaluate docetaxel and M9241 in mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT04633252.

420 PROSTVAC in combination with nivolumab enhanced immune cell infiltration in prostate cancer

Background

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common non-cutaneous diagnosed cancer among men in USA.1 Although clinical outcomes are favorable for patients with localized disease, 20–30% of patients will develop metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) and have poor prognosis. Immunotherapy, as a single agent, provides benefit to a small subset of PC patients, which is thought to be partially due to its known cold tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Combination studies are needed to enhance benefit.2 Prostvac is a therapeutic cancer vaccine engineered to activate an immune response against prostate-specific Antigen (PSA).3 Prostvac alone could induce systemic immune response by increasing immune-cell infiltrates in and around the tumor.4 In this study, we are exploring the effect of Prostvac in combination with nivolumab in TIME in prostate cancer.

Methods

We treated locally advanced prostate cancer patients (n=6) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) with neoadjuvant Prostvac in combination with nivolumab, an immune checkpoint PD-1 inhibitor. Dynamic changes in TIME before and after treatment were studied using multiplex immunofluorescence (Opal Method). Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded sections from matched pre-treated prostate biopsies and post-treated RP samples were stained with a validated T cell panel (DAPI, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, Ki67, Pan CK and PD-L1). To analyze the data, TIME was segmented into 3 compartments: intratumoral, invasive margin and benign.

Results

Combination immunotherapy significantly increased CD4+ T cell density in the invasive margin (mean 211.5 cells/mm2 vs 592.2 cells/mm2, p<0.05), with similar trend in the intratumoral and the benign compartments. CD8+ T cell density increased after treatment in the invasive margin (mean 47.25 cells/mm2 vs 157cells/mm2) and the benign compartment. 5/6 and 4/6 patients showed more than 2-fold increase of CD4 and CD8 T cells in the TIME, respectively, in at least one of the three compartments. Increased proliferative indices in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were also seen after treatment. Tregs were present in low frequencies in TIME (maximum of 12 cells/mm2) with no significant changes. Moreover, a significant drop in tumor cell Ki67 after treatment (mean 252.8 cells/mm2 vs 100.5 cells/332, p<0.05) suggests that the combination may control tumor growth.

Conclusions

The combination of Neoadjuvant Prostvac and nivolumab was associated with increased immune cell infiltration in a cohort of early prostate cancer patients. A broader examination of the TIME and the role immune cells undertake to control tumor growth is on-going.

Trial Registration

NCT02933255

References

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin (Internet) 2020;70:7–3

Zhao SG, Lehrer J, Chang SL, et al. The immune landscape of prostate cancer and nomination of PD-L2 as a potential therapeutic target. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018;111:301–10.

Madan RA, Arlen PM, Mohebtash M, et al. Prostvac-VF: a vectorbased vaccine targeting PSA in prostate cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2009;18:1001–11

Abdul Sater H, Marté JL, Donahue RN, et al. Neoadjuvant PROSTVAC prior to radical prostatectomy enhances T-cell infiltration into the tumor immune microenvironment in men with prostate cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8(1):655–64

Ethics Approval

This study was performed in compliance with ethical standard and was approved by the NIH IRB, 17C-0007. All patients participating in this study gave an informed consent before taking part.

483 Initial safety results and immune responses induced by a novel human papillomavirus (HPV)-specific gorilla adenovirus immunotherapy vaccine, PRGN-2009, in patients with advanced HPV-associated cancers

Background

PRGN-2009 is a novel gorilla adenovirus vaccine containing 35 non-HLA-restricted epitopes of HPV 16 and 18 which is being tested in an open-label, NCI-sponsored, single-center Phase I/II study alone and combined with the bifunctional TGF-β ”trap”/anti-PD-L1 fusion protein bintrafusp alfa (BA) (NCT04432597).

Methods

For the Phase I of the trial, eligible patients are adults with previously treated (checkpoint blockade allowed) recurrent/metastatic HPV-associated cancers. Objectives are to assess the safety and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of PRGN-2009 alone and combined with BA. Treatment followed a single-agent 3+3 dose escalation at two dose levels of PRGN-2009 (dose level 1: 1x1011 viral particle units (VPU), dose level 2: 5x1011 VPU) subcutaneously Q2W for 3 times, then Q4W for up to one year in total. After determination of RP2D, a combination cohort of 10 patients treated with PRGN-2009 at the RP2D combined with BA (1200 mg IV Q2W for 52 weeks) opened. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from patients before and after vaccination with PRGN-2009 were stimulated with overlapping peptide pools and assessed by intracellular cytokine staining to identify HPV-16 and HPV-18 specific T-cells, as well as T-cells targeting cascade antigens not encoded by the vaccine.

Results

Six patients were enrolled in the single-agent PRGN-2009 dose-escalation phase (3 with cervical cancer, 2 with anal cancer, 1 with vaginal cancer). Observed adverse events were Grade 1-2 flu-like syndrome (headache, body aches), injection site reactions (erythema, pruritus, soreness, localized edema), fatigue, and rash. There were no dose limiting toxicities, and 5x1011 VPU was selected as RP2D. Four patients had stable disease as best response, (one ongoing, 10 months on treatment).T-cells targeting HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were increased after vaccination in 100% of patients, with 3/6 (50%) developing HPV-16 T cells and 5/6 (83%) developing HPV-18 T cells. In some patients, the magnitude and breadth of HPV-16 and HPV-18 specific T cells were notably increased after repeated vaccination. T cells that target the cascade antigens brachyury and MUC1 were also increased in all patients evaluated. Multifunctional T-cell responses against all these antigens were also developed after vaccination in the majority of patients. No differences in immunogenicity were noted between the two dose levels. Enrollment is underway in combination with BA. Updated data will be presented.

Conclusions

The Phase 1 results demonstrate the safety of single-agent PRGN-2009 and induction of anti-HPV T-cell immune responses, supporting the hypothesis that PRGN-2009 could potentially induce anti-tumor effects in HPV-associated cancers.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NCI.

Trial Registration

NCT04432597

Ethics Approval

Approved by the NIH IRB (Ref No 543876). All participants have given informed consent before taking part in the study.

Bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in patients with human papillomavirus-associated malignancies

BACKGROUND

Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of transforming growth factor (TGF)-βRII (a TGF-β 'trap') fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking programmed cell death ligand 1. This is the largest analysis of patients with advanced, pretreated human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated malignancies treated with bintrafusp alfa.

METHODS

In these phase 1 (NCT02517398) and phase 2 trials (NCT03427411), 59 patients with advanced, pretreated, checkpoint inhibitor-naive HPV-associated cancers received bintrafusp alfa intravenously every 2 weeks until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoint was best overall response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1; other endpoints included safety.

RESULTS

As of April 17, 2019 (phase 1), and October 4, 2019 (phase 2), the confirmed objective response rate per RECIST V.1.1 in the checkpoint inhibitor-naive, full-analysis population was 30.5% (95% CI, 19.2% to 43.9%; five complete responses); eight patients had stable disease (disease control rate, 44.1% (95% CI, 31.2% to 57.6%)). In addition, three patients experienced a delayed partial response after initial disease progression, for a total clinical response rate of 35.6% (95% CI, 23.6% to 49.1%). An additional patient with vulvar cancer had an unconfirmed response. Forty-nine patients (83.1%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were grade 3/4 in 16 patients (27.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Bintrafusp alfa showed clinical activity and manageable safety and is a promising treatment in HPV-associated cancers. These findings support further investigation of bintrafusp alfa in patients with advanced, pretreated HPV-associated cancers.

Phase 1 open-label trial of intravenous administration of MVA-BN-brachyury-TRICOM vaccine in patients with advanced cancer

Background

MVA-BN-brachyury-TRICOM is a recombinant vector-based therapeutic cancer vaccine designed to induce an immune response against brachyury. Brachyury, a transcription factor overexpressed in advanced cancers, has been associated with treatment resistance, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and metastatic potential. MVA-BN-brachyury-TRICOM has demonstrated immunogenicity and safety in previous clinical trials of subcutaneously administered vaccine. Preclinical studies have suggested that intravenous administration of therapeutic vaccines can induce superior CD8⁺ T cell responses, higher levels of systemic cytokine release, and stronger natural killer cell activation and proliferation. This is the first-in-human study of the intravenous administration of MVA-BN-brachyury-TRICOM.

Methods

Between January 2020 and March 2021, 13 patients were treated on a phase 1, open-label, 3+3 design, dose-escalation study at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. The study population was adults with advanced solid tumors and was enriched for chordoma, a rare sarcoma of the notochord that overexpresses brachyury. Vaccine was administered intravenously at three DLs on days 1, 22, and 43. Blood samples were taken to assess drug pharmacokinetics and immune activation. Imaging was conducted at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability as determined by the frequency of dose-limiting toxicities; a secondary endpoint was determination of the recommended phase 2 dose.

Results

No dose-limiting toxicities were observed and no serious adverse events were attributed to the vaccine. Vaccine-related toxicities were consistent with class profile (ie, influenza-like symptoms). Cytokine release syndrome up to grade 2 was observed with no adverse outcomes. Dose-effect trend was observed for fever, chills/rigor, and hypotension. Efficacy analysis of objective response rate per RECIST 1.1 at the end of study showed one patient with a partial response, four with stable disease, and eight with progressive disease. Three patients with stable disease experienced clinical benefit in the form of improvement in pain. Immune correlatives showed T cell activation against brachyury and other tumor-associated cascade antigens.

Conclusions

Intravenous administration of MVA-BN-brachyury-TRICOM vaccine was safe and tolerable. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The maximum administered dose was 10⁹ infectious units every 3 weeks for three doses. This dose was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose.

Trial registration number

NCT04134312.

A comparison of 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT in a prospective cohort of men with metastatic prostate cancer

Introduction: ¹⁸F-DCFPyL, ¹⁸F-NaF and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were compared in a prospective cohort of men with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods: 67 men (Group 1) with documented metastatic PCa underwent ¹⁸F-DCFPyL and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT and a subgroup of 30 men (Group 2) underwent additional imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. The tracers were compared for their detection rates, imaging concordance, associations with Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), treatment at the time of imaging and castration status. Results: Overall, 61 men had metastatic disease detected on one or more scans, while 6 men were negative. In Group 1, ¹⁸F-NaF detected significantly more metastatic lesions than ¹⁸F-DCFPyL (median of 3 lesions versus 2, P = 0.001) even after eliminating benign causes of ¹⁸F-NaF uptake. This difference was particularly clear for men receiving treatment (P = 0.005) or who were castrate resistant (P = 0.014). The median percentage of bone lesions that were concordant on ¹⁸F-DCFPyL and ¹⁸F-NaF was 50%. In Group 2, ¹⁸F-DCFPyL detected more lesions than ¹⁸F-FDG (median of 5 lesions versus 2, P = 0.0003), regardless of PSA level, castration status or treatment. The median percentage of lesions that were concordant on ¹⁸F-DCFPyL and ¹⁸F-FDG was 22.2%. This percentage was slightly higher for castrate-resistant than castrate-sensitive men (P = 0.048). Conclusion: ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT is the most versatile of the three PET agents for metastatic PCa however, ¹⁸F-NaF detects more bone metastases. Imaging reveals substantial tumor heterogeneity with only 50% concordance between ¹⁸F-DCFPyL and ¹⁸F-NaF and 22% concordance for ¹⁸F-DCFPyL and ¹⁸F-FDG. This indicates considerable phenotypic differences among metastatic lesions.

Study to Compare Capsule and Liquid Formulations of Enzalutamide After Single-Dose Administration Under Fasting Conditions in Prostate Cancer

LESSONS LEARNED

Limited evidence suggests an acceptable pharmacokinetic profile when enzalutamide is administered via a liquid formulation extracted from the commercially available liquid-filled soft-gelatin capsules. Tolerability may limit use in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

Enzalutamide is an established standard-of-care treatment for advanced prostate cancer with a commercially available formulation that may be inconvenient for some patients. We proposed a study to evaluate the bioequivalence of a liquid formulation to provide an alternative method of administration.

METHODS

This was a single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover pilot bioequivalence study to compare two oral formulations of enzalutamide: four enzalutamide 40 mg liquid-filled soft-gelatin capsules (commercially available) administered whole versus enzalutamide 160 mg liquid (extracted from capsules) administered via oral syringe. To assess bioequivalence, patients were randomized to receive a single dose of one formulation, then cross over to receive the alternative formulation following a 42-day washout period; serial plasma samples were collected over the course of 24 hours, followed by collections at 3, 8, and 42 days after the dose for both formulations. Bioequivalence of the formulations was assessed via comparisons of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) calculations per U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. The study also assessed the safety and tolerability of the formulations.

RESULTS

The study failed to meet proposed accrual, with only one patient enrolled, thus limiting the bioequivalence evaluation. Based on the data from a single patient, the drug exposure (measured by AUC) of enzalutamide and N-desmethyl enzalutamide (primary active metabolite) for the liquid formulation was 112% and 117%, respectively, compared with the capsule formulation. Although both formulations appeared well tolerated with no adverse events reported, the tolerability assessment questionnaire revealed an unpleasant taste of the liquid formulation.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary evidence suggests a similar pharmacokinetic profile when administering liquid extracted from enzalutamide soft-gelatin capsules compared with intact capsules in patients with prostate cancer.

Neoadjuvant PROSTVAC prior to radical prostatectomy enhances T-cell infiltration into the tumor immune microenvironment in men with prostate cancer

Background

Clinical trials have shown the ability of therapeutic vaccines to generate immune responses to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). What is relatively less known is if this translates into immune-cell (IC) infiltration into the tumor microenvironment. This study examined whether neoadjuvant prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-targeted vaccination with PROSTVAC could induce T-cell immunity, particularly at the tumor site.

Methods

An open-label, phase II study of neoadjuvant PROSTVAC vaccine enrolled 27 patients with localized prostate cancer awaiting radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated increases in CD4 and CD8 T-cell infiltrates (RP tissue vs baseline biopsies) using a six-color multiplex immunofluorescence Opal method. Antigen-specific responses were assessed by intracellular cytokine staining after in vitro stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with overlapping 15-mer peptide pools encoding the TAAs PSA, brachyury and MUC-1.

Results

Of 27 vaccinated patients, 26 had matched prevaccination (biopsy) and postvaccination (RP) prostate samples available for non-compartmentalized analysis (NCA) and compartmentalized analysis (CA). Tumor CD4 T-cell infiltrates were significantly increased in postvaccination RP specimens compared with baseline biopsies by NCA (median 176/mm² vs 152/mm²; IQR 136–317/mm² vs 69–284/mm²; p=0.0249; median ratio 1.20; IQR 0.64–2.25). By CA, an increase in both CD4 T-cell infiltrates at the tumor infiltrative margin (median 198/mm² vs 151/mm²; IQR 123–500/mm² vs 85–256/mm²; p=0.042; median ratio 1.44; IQR 0.59–4.17) and in CD8 T-cell infiltrates at the tumor core (median 140/mm² vs 105/mm²; IQR 91–175/mm² vs 83–163/mm²; p=0.036; median ratio 1.25; IQR 0.88–2.09) were noted in postvaccination RP specimens compared with baseline biopsies. A total of 13/25 patients (52%) developed peripheral T-cell responses to any of the three tested TAAs (non-neoantigens); five of these had responses to more than one antigen of the three evaluated.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant PROSTVAC can induce both tumor immune response and peripheral immune response.

Trial registration number

NCT02153918.

Phase II evaluation of the triple combination of PDS0101, M9241, and bintrafusp alfa in patients with HPV 16 positive malignancies

2501

Background: There are more than 630,000 cases of HPV associated malignancies including cervical, oropharyngeal and anal cancer worldwide annually. HPV 16 is responsible for the majority of these cases. About 15-20% of HPV associated malignancies respond to PD-(L)1 inhibitors, but for the overwhelming majority of patients who progress on these immunotherapies there is no effective standard of care therapy. Preclinical studies have shown that the triple combination of PDS0101 (Versamune-HPV), a liposomal multipeptide therapeutic vaccine targeting HPV 16 E6/E7, M9241, a tumor-targeting immunocytokine composed of IL-12 heterodimers fused to a monoclonal antibody targeting free DNA in necrotic tumor regions, and bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, resulted in maximum HPV-specific T cell responses, T cell tumor infiltration and tumor reduction as compared to any one or two of these agents alone. Methods: Fourteen pts with HPV 16+ relapsed or refractory advanced cancer were enrolled to the triple combination of PDS0101, M9241 and bintrafusp alfa (NCT04287868). Pts received bintrafusp alfa at 1200 mg flat dose i.v. every 2 weeks, M9241 at 16.8 mcg/kg s.c. every 4 weeks and PDS0101 given as two separate 0.5 ml s.c. injections every 4 weeks. Dose reductions of M9241 to 8 mcg/kg were allowed as well as skipped doses of any agent for ongoing toxicities. Results: Fourteen pts with advanced HPV 16+ cancers (5 cervical, 2 vaginal/vulvar, 4 anal, 3 oropharyngeal) were treated. 4/14 (28.6%) pts had a grade 3 treatment related toxicity including grade 3 hematuria in 2 pts with cervical ca and prior pelvic radiation and grade 3 AST/ALT elevation in 2 pts, one with anal ca and one with vaginal ca. For one patient with grade 3 AST/ALT elevation dose reduction of M9241 from 16.8 to 8 mcg/kg allowed for continued treatment with AST/ALT remaining at grade 1 or less. One additional patient had transient asymptomatic grade 4 neutropenia. No other treatment related grade 3 or greater toxicities were noted. 10/14 (71%) pts have had objective responses: 1 CR (anal ca) and 9 PRs (3 cervical, 2 vulvar/vaginal, 2 anal, 2 oropharyngeal) with 9/10 of these responses ongoing after a median 5 month of follow up. Of the 14 pts, 6 pts have checkpoint naïve disease and 8 pts have checkpoint refractory disease. 5/6 (83%) pts with checkpoint naïve disease and 5/8 (63%) pts with checkpoint refractory disease have had objective responses. Analyses of immune responses and other immune correlates are ongoing. Conclusions: Triple combination of PDS0101, M9241 and bintrafusp alfa appears to have a manageable safety profile along with early evidence of notable clinical activity for pts with both checkpoint naïve as well as checkpoint refractory HPV 16+ advanced malignancies. Clinical trial information: NCT04287868.

A phase 1 open label trial of intravenous administration of MVA-BN-Brachyury vaccine in patients with advanced cancer

2617

Background: Brachyury is a member of the T-box family of transcription factors which is overexpressed in several tumor types and has been associated with treatment resistance, epithelial to mesenchymal transition and metastatic potential. MVA-BN-Brachyury vaccine is a vector-based therapeutic cancer vaccine which demonstrated immunogenicity and safety in previous clinical trials. Preclinical studies suggested that IV administration of vaccines can induce superior CD8 + T-cell responses as compared with SC or IM routes. This is the first-in-human study to evaluate safety and tolerability of IV administration of this vaccine. Methods: Patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced malignant solid tumors were treated with MVA-BN-Brachyury vaccine in a phase 1, open-label, 3+3 dose-escalation study. Eligible patients received a total of three vaccine doses intravenously Q3W at 1x107 (DL1), 1x108 (DL2), or 1x109 infections units (Inf.U) (DL3). Patients were admitted for 48 hours for observation after each dose and had imaging at baseline and 1 and 3 months after the last vaccine dose. Primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability and establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Immune assays were performed in the first 10 enrolled patients. Results: In 13 patients (10 chordoma, 1 small cell breast, 1 prostate, 1 colorectal cancer), no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Right upper quadrant abdominal pain was the only grade 3 TRAE. All other TRAEs were grade 1 or 2; most common was cytokine release syndrome (four grade 2 and one grade 1. As of Feb 2021, 9 patients completed treatment and two planned restaging scans: 5 patients had PD (3 in DL1 and 2 in DL2), 3 had SD (2 in DL2 and 1 in DL3) and 1 had PR (DL3) as their best treatment response per RECIST 1.1. One patient with advanced sacral chordoma had significant reduction of ulcerated skin metastases after 2 doses, followed by 33% shrinkage at the end of trial. Two chordoma patients with SD reported significant pain improvement. Multifunctional Brachyury, CEA, and MUC1 specific T cells were increased after vaccination in in 60%, 67%, and 50% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: MVA-BN-Brachyury IV vaccine is safe across all tested dose levels and suggesting activity in chordoma at DL3 for which this vaccine was granted FDA orphan drug designation. Mild cytokine release syndrome (rigors, chills, fever and hypotension) has been observed in 5 patients and managed with IV fluids and steroids in 2 patients. A dose 1 x 109 Inf.U (DL3) was selected for RP2D based upon available safety data. Further research is pending to evaluate clinical benefit and immunogenicity. Clinical trial information: NCT04134312.

Patients with undetectable PSA 2 years after docetaxel for metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC)

e17044

Background: Patients with mCPSC have multiple treatment options to combine with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) including docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide and apalutamide, all of which have demonstrated a survival advantage. While oral anti-androgens are administered daily until progression but are less toxic, docetaxel has more upfront side effects. One of the advantages of using docetaxel is that the 6-cycle regimen (over approximately 4 months) potentially affords patients a respite from daily therapies thereafter. Furthermore, docetaxel may be more cost-effective. In this prospective study, mCSPC patients were treated with docetaxel and Prostvac, a therapeutic cancer vaccine. Since this study was initiated, Prostvac did not demonstrate independent clinical activity in a phase 3 trial in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Nonetheless, this study provides an opportunity to evaluate responses to docetaxel-based therapy in mCSPC. Methods: Eligible patients included those with mCSPC and ECOG of ≤ 2. All patients were treated with docetaxel and were planned to receive 75mg/m2 for 6 cycles within 4 months of starting ADT, as per the CHAARTED regimen. Patients were randomized to receive Prostvac prior to, concurrent with or after docetaxel. Patients were restaged annually with CT and Tc99 bone scan. The study was powered to evaluate immunologic responses, which is ongoing. For the purposes of this analysis, all patients were analyzed as one group and long-term PSA responses were evaluated. Results: The study enrolled 73 patients. Age range was 41-86 with a median of 63 years. Race distribution was 71.6% White, 20.3% Black, 4.1% other, and 4.1% unknown. Gleason scores were 6 (4.1%), 7 (21.6%), and 8-10 (68.9%), with 5.4% being unknown. Median pre-ADT PSA was 34.75 ng/mL. Low-volume disease represented 41.1% of patients and high-volume was 58.9%. After 2 years from the start of ADT, 22% of all patients had PSA values of ≤ 0.2 ng/mL. This included 37% of the low-volume group and 12% of the high-volume group. Three years from the start of ADT, 14% of all patients had PSA values ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (20% of the low-volume group, 9% of the high-volume group). Conclusions: These data highlight long-term outcomes of 6 cycles of docetaxel for men with mCSPC. Although there are concerns about the short-term toxicity of docetaxel, there is potential for prolonged stable disease after ̃4 months of chemotherapy that allows these patients to defer additional oral anti-androgen therapy for years in some patients. The proportions of patients presented here are an underestimate of those who could continue to be monitored for slowly rising, but low PSAs, before starting the next line of therapy. Additional research is required to determine the optimal therapeutic sequence for men diagnosed with mCSPC and long-term implications for quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Clinical trial information: NCT02649855.

First-in-human phase I/II trial of PRGN-2009 vaccine as monotherapy or with bintrafusp alfa in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers (HPVC) and as neoadjuvant/induction therapy in locoregionally advanced (LA) HPV oropharyngeal (OP) and sinonasal (SN) squamous cell cancer (SCC)

TPS6092

Background: R/M HPVC (cervical, anal, oropharyngeal, etc.) are incurable by current therapies. For newly diagnosed LA HPV-OPSCC standard-of-care (SOC) is radiotherapy ± chemotherapy (C/RT) or surgery ± adjuvant C/RT, with considerable risk of relapse. Newly diagnosed LA SNSCC treatment follows the OPSCC paradigm, and detection of HPV appears to confer improved prognosis. Neoadjuvant PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) before surgery may improve RFS and is being evaluated in a multicenter phase III clinical trial (Keynote-689). PRGN-2009 (P) is a novel gorilla adenovirus vaccine containing 35 non-HLA-restricted epitopes of HPV 16 and 18 shown to induce HPV specific responses (preclinical models). Bintrafusp alfa (BA) is a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1 with promising activity in HPVC. This trial will evaluate the safety and activity of P/ P + BA in patients with previously treated R/M HPVC and as neoadjuvant/induction therapy before SOC surgery or C/RT in newly diagnosed LA HPV-OPSCC and HPV-SNSCC. Methods: This is a first-in-human, investigator-initiated, single-center phase I/II trial. Pts with previously treated (incl. ICB) R/M HPVC are eligible for Phase I: P dose escalation arm (3+3 design, 6-12 patients) testing 2 dose levels (1x1011, 5x1011 viral particle units, SC Q2W three times, then Q4W), and combination arm (10 patients) testing P (recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), same schedule) + BA (1200 mg IV Q2W). Treatment (both arms) will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, decision to withdraw. Primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoints include ORR (RECIST 1.1), PFS, and OS. For Phase II, patients with newly diagnosed stage II/III (AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th ed.) HPV-OPSCC and stage II/III/IVA/IVB HPV-SNSCC planned for SOC C/RT or surgery will be eligible for two treatment arms of 20+2 patients each (sequential): P arm and P + BA, to evaluate the treatment activity. All patients will have pre-treatment biopsy, receive two cycles of the study treatment at the NCI Clinical Center two weeks apart, followed by post-treatment biopsy and SOC treatment (at the referring institution) 4 weeks after the first study treatment. Primary endpoint is post-treatment ≥2-fold increase in tumor-infiltrating CD3+ cells. Secondary endpoints include RFS, OS. Exploratory endpoints for both arms include analyses of immune subsets, soluble factors, and HPV-specific immune responses in peripheral blood and tissue where available, and in Phase II sequencing (exome, scRNA), immune spatial profiling with multiplex immunofluorescence, and salivary HPV DNA. Clinical trial registry: NCT04432597. Clinical trial information: NCT04432597.

A phase I/II study of bintrafusp alfa and NHS-IL12 in combination with docetaxel in adults with metastatic castration sensitive (mCSPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

TPS5096

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition is successful in a small subpopulation of men with prostate cancer. This could be related to barriers to immune response in the tumor microenvironment. Immunocytokines present an opportunity to specifically target the pleiotropic tumor microenvironment impacting immune cells beyond T-cells. NHS-IL12 is an immunocytokine that carries IL-12 (shown to impact natural killer and myeloid cells) and binds to necrotic tissue with exposed histones. Phase 1 studies have indicated immune and even PSA responses in prostate cancer to NHS-IL12 (Strauss J, CCR 2019). Preclinical data has demonstrated synergy with docetaxel, which is standard therapy in both mCSPC and mCRPC. Further synergy has been shown with a novel first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein (bintrafusp alfa) composed of the extracellular domain of human TGF-β receptor II (TGFβRII), which effectively functions to sequester or “trap” all three TGF-β isoforms (Lind H, JITC 2020), fused to a monoclonal antibody against PD-L1. This study will examine the potential of a novel combination of chemotherapy, checkpoint inhibition, and immunocytokines in metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: The study will evaluate safety of NHS-IL12 with docetaxel at escalating doses followed by the addition of bintrafusp alfa in all metastatic patients. Once safety of the combination is established, patients will enroll in 2 cohorts with either mCSPC or mCRPC. Eligible patients include mCSPC (≤134 days of starting ADT) and mCRPC (must have been previously treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide), with good performance status (ECOG of ≤ 2). Patients with brain metastases or who are immunocompromised are excluded. For mCSPC, the primary endpoint will evaluate the increase in the proportion of patients who have a PSA less than 0.2 ng/mL 7 months after the start of ADT, which is based on the prognostic value of PSA less than 0.2 ng/mL at 7 months in mCSPC (Harshman L, JCO 2017). The secondary endpoint is biochemical and radiographic time to progression. The primary endpoint for the mCRPC patients will evaluate progression free survival with secondary endpoints examining the percentage of patients with a 50% PSA decline from baseline and radiographic response rates per RECIST. Exploratory analysis will analyze changes in immune cell subsets after treatment as well as immune status of the tumor microenvironment. Clinical trial information: NCT04633252.

Anaplastic Features in Advanced Prostate Cancer With and Without DNA Damage Repair Mutations

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic prostate cancer has a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. Seven clinical features of anaplastic prostate cancer have been prospectively identified. In this phase II clinical trial, we identified mutations, including DNA damage repair (DDR) mutations, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were treated with durvalumab and olaparib and determined how many of them can be described as anaplastic, and we examined the overlap between anaplastic features and DDR mutations.

METHODS

Eligible patients with mCRPC received prior enzalutamide, abiraterone, or both. Patients were treated with durvalumab 1500 mg i.v. every 28 days and olaparib 300 mg p.o. every 12 hours until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients underwent mandatory baseline biopsies of metastatic lesions.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between anaplastic and nonanaplastic patients. Eleven patients (20%) displayed clear anaplastic features, and 43 (78.2%) lacked anaplastic features. In the anaplastic group, 2/11 (18.2%) had germline DRR mutations, and 4/11 (36.3%) had somatic DDR mutations. In the nonanaplastic group, 7/43 (16.3%) had germline mutations, and 13/43 (30.2%) had somatic mutations. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times in patients with anaplastic features (6.5 months) and without anaplastic features (5.1 months) were similar (hazard ratio 0.998, P = .996).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with and without anaplastic features appear to have similar total rates of DDR mutations and also similar rates of somatic and germline DDR mutations. Patients with anaplastic features have a trend toward improved PFS when treated with olaparib and durvalumab compared with nonanaplastic patients.

Nascent Prostate Cancer Heterogeneity Drives Evolution and Resistance to Intense Hormonal Therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients diagnosed with high risk localized prostate cancer have variable outcomes following surgery. Trials of intense neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) have shown lower rates of recurrence among patients with minimal residual disease after treatment. The molecular features that distinguish exceptional responders from poor responders are not known.

OBJECTIVE

To identify genomic and histologic features associated with treatment resistance at baseline.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Targeted biopsies were obtained from 37 men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer before receiving 6 mo of ADT plus enzalutamide. Biopsy tissues were used for whole-exome sequencing and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We assessed the relationship of molecular features with final pathologic response using a cutpoint of 0.05 cm³ for residual cancer burden to compare exceptional responders to incomplete and nonresponders. We assessed intratumoral heterogeneity at the tissue and genomic level, and compared the volume of residual disease to the Shannon diversity index for each tumor. We generated multivariate models of resistance based on three molecular features and one histologic feature, with and without multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging estimates of baseline tumor volume.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Loss of chromosome 10q (containing PTEN) and alterations to TP53 were predictive of poor response, as were the expression of nuclear ERG on IHC and the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. Patients with incompletely and nonresponding tumors harbored greater tumor diversity as estimated via phylogenetic tree reconstruction from DNA sequencing and analysis of IHC staining. Our four-factor binary model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.89) to predict poor response correlated with greater diversity in our cohort and a validation cohort of 57 Gleason score 8-10 prostate cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas. When baseline tumor volume was added to the model, it distinguished poor response to NADT with an AUC of 0.98. Prospective use of this model requires further retrospective validation with biopsies from additional trials.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of prostate cancers exhibit greater histologic and genomic diversity at the time of diagnosis, and these localized tumors have greater fitness to resist therapy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Some prostate cancer tumors do not respond well to a hormonal treatment called androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We used tumor volume and four other parameters to develop a model to identify tumors that will not respond well to ADT. Treatments other than ADT should be considered for these patients.

Phase I study of a multitargeted recombinant Ad5 PSA/MUC-1/brachyury-based immunotherapy vaccine in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Background

Antitumor vaccines targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) can generate antitumor immune response. A novel vaccine platform using adenovirus 5 (Ad5) vectors [E1–, E2b–] targeting three TAAs—prostate-specific antigen (PSA), brachyury, and MUC-1—has been developed. Both brachyury and the C-terminus of MUC-1 are overexpressed in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and have been shown to play an important role in resistance to chemotherapy, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and metastasis. The transgenes for PSA, brachyury, and MUC-1 all contain epitope modifications for the expression of CD8+ T-cell enhancer agonist epitopes. We report here the first-in-human trial of this vaccine platform.

Methods

Patients with mCRPC were given concurrently three vaccines targeting PSA, brachyury, and MUC-1 at 5×10¹¹ viral particles (VP) each, subcutaneously every 3 weeks for a maximum of three doses (dose de-escalation cohort), followed by a booster vaccine every 8 weeks for 1 year (dose-expansion cohort only). The primary objective was to determine the safety and the recommended phase II dose. Immune assays and clinical responses were evaluated.

Results

Eighteen patients with mCRPC were enrolled between July 2018 and September 2019 and received at least one vaccination. Median PSA was 25.58 ng/mL (range, 0.65–1006 ng/mL). The vaccine was tolerable and safe, and no grade >3 treatment-related adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. One patient had a partial response, while five patients had confirmed PSA decline and five had stable disease for >6 months. Median progression-free survival was 22 weeks (95% CI: 19.1 to 34). Seventeen (100%) of 17 patients mounted T-cell responses to at least one TAA, whereras 8 (47%) of 17 patients mounted immune responses to all three TAAs. Multifunctional T-cell responses to PSA, MUC-1, and brachyury were also detected after vaccination in the majority of the patients.

Conclusions

Ad5 PSA/MUC-1/brachyury vaccine is well tolerated. The primary end points were met and there were no DLTs. The recommended phase II dose is 5×10¹¹ VP. The vaccine demonstrated clinical activity, including one partial response and confirmed PSA responses in five patients. Three patients with prolonged PSA responses received palliative radiation therapy. Further research is needed to evaluate the clinical benefit and immunogenicity of this vaccine in combination with other immuno-oncology agents and/or palliative radiation therapy.

Trial registration number

NCT03481816.