The pearl necklace sign: an imaging sign of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder at MR cholangiopancreatography

Imaging update on gallbladder adenomyomatosis and its mimics

Radiologists across many imaging modalities commonly encounter gallbladder adenomyomatosis. The classic imaging appearances of gallbladder adenomyomatosis are well described and confirm benignity. However, in clinical practice, adenomyomatosis can be challenging to differentiate from other gallbladder pathologies that require cholecystectomy. In this article, we describe the common and uncommon appearances of gallbladder adenomyomatosis on multimodality imaging, helping differentiate adenomyomatosis from non-benign gallbladder abnormalities. Accurately differentiating adenomyomatosis from its mimics provides the surgical team with important clinical and surgical management information, improving patient outcomes.

Gallbladder polyps and adenomyomatosis

Incidental findings are commonly detected during examination of the gallbladder. Differentiating benign from malignant lesions is critical because of the poor prognosis associated with gallbladder malignancy. Therefore, it is important that radiologists and sonographers are aware of common incidental gallbladder findings, which undoubtedly will continue to increase with growing medical imaging use. Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality used to examine the gallbladder and biliary tree, but contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MRI are increasingly used. This review article focuses on two common incidental findings in the gallbladder; adenomyomatosis and gallbladder polyps. The imaging features of these conditions will be reviewed and compared between radiological modalities, and the pathology, epidemiology, natural history, and management will be discussed.

Spectrum of imaging findings in hyperplastic cholecystosis and potential mimics

Adenomyomatosis and cholesterolosis of the gallbladder, collectively termed hyperplastic cholecystosis, are commonly encountered incidental findings on imaging studies performed for a variety of indications including biliary colic or nonspecific abdominal pain. These pathologies are rarely the source of symptoms, generally considered benign and do not require further work-up. However, their imaging characteristics can overlap with more sinister conditions that should not be missed. In this review, the imaging findings of adenomyomatosis and cholesterolosis will be reviewed followed by other gallbladder pathologies that might mimic these conditions radiologically. Important differentiating factors will be discussed that can aid the radiologist in making a more confident imaging diagnosis.

Management of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations

Gallbladder polyps (also known as polypoid lesions of the gallbladder) are a common incidental finding. The vast majority of gallbladder polyps smaller than 10 mm are not true neoplastic polyps but are benign cholesterol polyps with no inherent risk of malignancy. In addition, recent studies have shown that the overall risk of gallbladder cancer is not increased in patients with small gallbladder polyps, calling into question the rationale for frequent and prolonged follow-up of these common lesions. In 2021, a Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound, or SRU, consensus conference was convened to provide recommendations for the management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps at US. See also the editorial by Sidhu and Rafailidis in this issue.

Infantile Adenomyomatosis of the Gallbladder in a 3-Month-Old

Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder is an acquired condition of the gallbladder with epithelial, mucosal, and muscular hypertrophy. The result is usually gallbladder wall thickening with associated diverticula known as Rokitansky-Aschoff's sinuses. These mucosal invaginations of the gallbladder wall may extend beyond the muscular layer. The condition is typically asymptomatic and is predominantly diagnosed in adults between 50 and 60 years of age, usually with concomitant cholelithiasis, motility disorders, or chronic inflammation. Few cases within the literature have been described in the pediatric population and even fewer within this subset have been diagnosed in infants. We describe a case of a 3-month-old male with failure to thrive, persistent nonbilious, nonbloody emesis, and elevated transaminases with ultrasound evidence of gallbladder adenomyomatosis. The patient was managed with outpatient laboratory monitoring and follow-up imaging.

Current update on gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder (GB) carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy and is associated with poor prognosis. Numerous risk factors have been associated with the development of GB carcinoma. GB carcinomas may present as mass lesions replacing the GB, focal or diffuse thickening of the GB wall, and intraluminal mass in the GB. Various benign conditions can mimic GB carcinoma. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathology, clinical findings, imaging features, and management of GB carcinomas.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2019: The 3rd English edition

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery launched the clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers (cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer) in 2007, then published the 2nd version in 2014.

METHODS

In this 3rd version, clinical questions (CQs) were proposed on six topics. The recommendation, grade for recommendation, and statement for each CQ were discussed and finalized by an evidence-based approach. Recommendations were graded as Grade 1 (strong) or Grade 2 (weak) according to the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

The 31 CQs covered the six topics: (a) prophylactic treatment, (b) diagnosis, (c) biliary drainage, (d) surgical treatment, (e) chemotherapy, and (f) radiation therapy. In the 31 CQs, 14 recommendations were rated strong and 14 recommendations weak. The remaining three CQs had no recommendation. Each CQ includes a statement of how the recommendations were graded.

CONCLUSIONS

This latest guideline provides recommendations for important clinical aspects based on evidence. Future collaboration with the cancer registry will be key for assessing the guidelines and establishing new evidence.

A narrative review of gallbladder adenomyomatosis: what we need to know

Gallbladder adenomyomatosis (GA) is increasingly encountered in clinical practice due to increasing use of imagings especially ultrasound (US). Clinicians need to know what is the implication of this condition and its proper management. GA is a degenerative and proliferative disease characterized by excessive epithelial proliferation associated with hypertrophy of muscularis propria. This leads to outpouchings of mucosa into or beyond the muscle layer forming intramural diverticula recognized as Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses (RAS). Three types of GA are recognised: fundal, segmental and diffuse type. In fundal GA, there is focal thickening involving the GB fundus. In segmental GA, there is circumferential overgrowth of the GB wall that leads to formation of compartments. In diffuse GA, there is disseminated thickening and irregularity of the mucosa and muscularis. The pathogenesis of GA is unknown. It commonly occurs in middle age with equal sex distribution. Diagnosis of GA is by imagings showing thickened gallbladder wall containing cysts. Characteristic features are “comet-tail” artefacts and “twinkling” artefacts on US, “pearl-necklace sign” on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and “rosary sign” on computed tomography (CT). Cholecystectomy should be offered for symptomatic GA of any type. For asymptomatic GA, cholecystectomy may be considered for segmental type for its increased risk of malignancy and for diffuse type for its difficult visualization of any coexisting malignancy. Asymptomatic fundal GA can be safely observed with US. How frequent and how long should a fundal GA be monitored with US remains unknown. In case of diagnostic doubt, cholecystectomy should always be offered to avoid overlooked malignancy.

Imaging-based algorithmic approach to gallbladder wall thickening

Gallbladder (GB) wall thickening is a frequent finding caused by a spectrum of conditions. It is observed in many extracholecystic as well as intrinsic GB conditions. GB wall thickening can either be diffuse or focal. Diffuse wall thickening is a secondary occurrence in both extrinsic and intrinsic pathologies of GB, whereas, focal wall thickening is mostly associated with intrinsic GB pathologies. In the absence of specific clinical features, accurate etiological diagnosis can be challenging. The survival rate in GB carcinoma (GBC) can be improved if it is diagnosed at an early stage, especially when the tumor is confined to the wall. The pattern of wall thickening in GBC is often confused with benign diseases, especially chronic cholecystitis, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, and adenomyomatosis. Early recognition and differentiation of these conditions can improve the prognosis. In this minireview, the authors describe the patterns of abnormalities on various imaging modalities (conventional as well as advanced) for the diagnosis of GB wall thickening. This paper also illustrates an algorithmic approach for the etiological diagnosis of GB wall thickening and suggests a formatted reporting for GB wall abnormalities.

Gallbladder polyps: evolving approach to the diagnosis and management

Gallbladder (GB) polyp is a mucosal projection into the GB lumen. With increasing health awareness, GB polyps are frequently found using ultrasonography during health screening. The prevalence of GB polyps ranges between 1.3% and 9.5%. Most patients are asymptomatic and have benign characteristics. Of the nonneoplastic polyps, cholesterol polyps are most common, accounting for 60%-70% of lesions. However, a few polyps have malignant potential. Currently, the guidelines recommend laparoscopic cholecystectomy for polyps larger than 1 cm in diameter due to their malignan potential. The treatment algorithm can be influenced by the size, shape, and numbers of polyps, old age (>50 years), the presence of primary sclerosing cholangitis, and gallstones. This review summarizes the commonly recognized concepts on GB polyps from diagnosis to an algorithm of treatment.

Benign gallbladder diseases: Imaging techniques and tips for differentiating with malignant gallbladder diseases

Benign gallbladder diseases usually present with intraluminal lesions and localized or diffuse wall thickening. Intraluminal lesions of the gallbladder include gallstones, cholesterol polyps, adenomas, or sludge and polypoid type of gallbladder cancer must subsequently be excluded. Polyp size, stalk width, and enhancement intensity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and degree of diffusion restriction may help differentiate cholesterol polyps and adenomas from gallbladder cancer. Localized gallbladder wall thickening is largely due to segmental or focal gallbladder adenomyomatosis, although infiltrative cancer may present similarly. Identification of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses is pivotal in diagnosing adenomyomatosis. The layered pattern, degree of enhancement, and integrity of the wall are imaging clues that help discriminate innocuous thickening from gallbladder cancer. High-resolution ultrasound is especially useful for analyzing the layering of gallbladder wall. A diffusely thickened wall is frequently seen in inflammatory processes of the gallbladder. Nevertheless, it is important to check for coexistent cancer in instances of acute cholecystitis. Ultrasound used alone is limited in evaluating complicated cholecystitis and often requires complementary computed tomography. In chronic cholecystitis, preservation of a two-layered wall and weak wall enhancement are diagnostic clues for excluding malignancy. Magnetic resonance imaging in conjunction with diffusion-weighted imaging helps to differentiate xathogranulomatous cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer by identifying the presence of fat and degree of diffusion restriction. Such distinctions require a familiarity with typical imaging features of various gallbladder diseases and an understanding of the roles that assorted imaging modalities play in gallbladder evaluations.

Gallbladder Cancer: Imaging Appearance and Pitfalls in Diagnosis [Formula: see text]

Gallbladder cancer is an uncommon malignancy with an overall poor prognosis. The clinical and imaging presentation of gallbladder cancer often overlaps with benign disease, making diagnosis difficult. Gallbladder cancer is most easily diagnosed on imaging when it presents as a mass replacing the gallbladder. At this stage, the prognosis is usually poor. Recognizing the features of gallbladder cancer early in the disease can enable complete resection and improve prognosis. Recognition of the patterns of wall enhancement on computed tomography can help differentiate gallbladder cancer from benign disease. Gallbladder wall thickening without pericholecystic fluid presenting in an older patient with raised alkaline phosphatase should raise concern regarding gallbladder cancer. Gallbladder polyps in high-risk individuals need close surveillance or surgery as per guidelines. Small gallbladder cancers in the neck can present as biliary dilatation or cholecystitis, and careful examination of this area is needed to assess for lesion. The imaging appearance of gallbladder cancer is reviewed and supported by local institutional data. Features that differentiate it from its common mimics enabling earlier diagnosis are described.

Chronic inflammation-related radiological findings of gallbladder adenomyomatosis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess radiological findings of adenomyomatosis advancing to chronic inflammation to differentiate between adenomyomatosis with and without chronic inflammation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 79 patients with pathologically proven adenomyomatosis without (n = 10) or with chronic inflammation (n = 69), who underwent computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by surgery. MRI analysis included evaluation of GB wall-thickening type, presence and location of intramural cysts, and presence of stones. CT analysis included GB wall-thickening type only. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the image-based findings of adenomyomatosis associated with chronic inflammation.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, MRI-based GB wall-thickening type and presence of stones, and CT-based GB wall-thickening type were significantly different between adenomyomatosis with and without chronic inflammation. On multivariate analysis, only the absence of stones was identified as a significant predictor of adenomyomatosis without chronic inflammation (odds ratio 5.58; 95% confidence interval 1.20-26.01; p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in other MRI- and CT-based findings between adenomyomatosis with and without chronic inflammation.

CONCLUSION

In patients with adenomyomatosis, the presence of stones was independently associated with chronic inflammation.

Performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared to MRI in the diagnostic of gallbladder diseases

BACKGROUND

Conventional ultrasound and MRI are very important techniques for the detection of gallbladder alterations. In the past years, studies showed that the additional use of contrast media to the conventional ultrasound allows the early depiction of pathological microvessels and their flow elucidating suspect findings stipulating the prompt therapy approach.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to evaluate the performance of CEUS in gallbladder diseases and compare it to MR imaging using histopathological findings as a gold standard.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The retrospective mono-center study analysed 18 patients with gallbladder alterations between 2009 and 2017. All patients underwent CEUS and MRI examinations and all results were confirmed in the pathology. CEUS images were performed and interpreted by a single experienced physician.

RESULTS

CEUS imaging results compared to MR imaging of the gallbladder demonstrated a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 67% and a negative predictive value of 100%.

CONCLUSION

CEUS enables the depiction and characterization of important vascularization's patterns facilitating the early differentiation between malignant and benign findings. In this study, CEUS displayed a better diagnostic accuracy than MRI proving to be a valuable additional tool to the established imaging modalities.

Differentiation of gallbladder adenomyomatosis from early-stage gallbladder cancer before surgery

Backgrounds/Aims

This study aimed to compare the perioperative and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder adenomyomatosis (GBA) or early-stage gallbladder cancer (GBC).

Methods

The perioperative and clinical outcomes of 194 patients diagnosed with GBA and 30 patients diagnosed with GBC who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institution from January 2011 to December 2017 were retrospectively compared.

Results

There were no significant differences between the GBA and GBC groups in sex (male:female ratio 1.0:0.8 vs. 1.0:0.7, p=0.734), BMI (23.9±3.4 vs. 24.0±3.8 kg/m², p=0.916), or preoperative liver function tests. Patients in the GBC group were significantly older (50.5±14.1 vs. 65.9±10.6 years, p<0.001) and had a higher ASA grade (40.3 vs. 63.4% grade II or III, p=0.043) than patients in the GBA group. Although there was no significant difference in preoperative diagnostic methods (p=0.442), the GBC group showed a significantly higher rate of misdiagnosis on preoperative imaging compared with postoperative histopathologic findings (30.9% vs. 53.3%, p=0.011). There were significantly more patients with gallstones in the GBA group than in the GBC group (68.6% vs. 40.0%, p=0.004).

Conclusions

In older patients hospitalized for biliary colic without gallstones but with a thickened gallbladder wall with inflammation on preoperative diagnostic exam, the possibility of early-stage GBC should be considered.

[Differential diagnosis of gallbladder abnormalities : Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Due to the high prevalence of clinically suspected cholecystitis or cholecystolithiasis the gallbladder is one of the organs examined the most by imaging.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

In most clinical settings ultrasound is the primary imaging method because of its wide availability, speed and superior spatial resolution. In cases of ambiguous findings or potential complications computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

When specific problems arise these imaging modalities may be enhanced by special techniques, e. g. contrast-enhanced ultrasound or dual-energy CT, and specific MRI sequences.

PERFORMANCE

Special variants of cholecystitis, such as xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and adenomyomatosis, may pose a particularly difficult diagnostic problem as they may resemble other diseases. Sequelae of cholecystolithiasis, such as the Mirizzi syndrome and acute bowel obstruction, may complicate the imaging algorithm as the location and the symptoms shift. Cases of neoplastic diseases of gallbladder cancer and other malignancies require a broad spectrum of imaging modalities.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Although the gallbladder can easily be examined with ultrasound, some cases require a more thorough ultrasound examination. In some cases only a combination of multiple imaging modalities yield the diagnosis. Further developments regarding technical issues and the diagnostic algorithm can be expected.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Ultrasound is the best first imaging modality. In cases of ambiguous findings or clinical complications CT or MRI are recommended.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and gallbladder diseases - A retrospective mono-center analysis of imaging findings with histopathological correlation

BACKGROUND

Radiologic imaging, especially ultrasound has an important role in the assessment of gallbladder alteration. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an easy and fast imaging technique that overcomes the limitations of greyscale ultrasonography. It is a safe tool that can be used as an additional imaging modality in order to elucidate and differentiate gallbladder pathological findings.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study analysis is to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS in gallbladder alterations and compare the results to the histopathological findings.

METHODS

A total of 17 patients between 2009 and 2017 with uncertain gallbladder appearance were retrospectively analysed. A single experienced physician with more than fifteen years' experience performed CEUS examinations by applying a second-generation blood pool agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Milan, Italy). Archived images were interpreted by the same physician and compared to the histopathological findings.

RESULTS

CEUS results, when correlated to the respectively pathologic findings, presented a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. All patients were successfully examined without any adverse reaction.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the excellent results in this study acknowledged that CEUS is a feasible alternative tool to differentiate gallbladder pathologic alterations.

Uncommon Intraluminal Tumors of the Gallbladder and Biliary Tract: Spectrum of Imaging Appearances

Intraluminal pathologic conditions of the bile ducts and gallbladder are common, most frequently consisting of calculi and adenocarcinoma. In recent years, intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts (IPN-B), which is analogous to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas, has been recognized as a distinct pathologic entity and a precursor lesion to adenocarcinoma of the bile ducts. Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the bile duct was subsequently described as a distinct pathologic entity. With increased awareness and advances in imaging techniques, these lesions are diagnosed with increased frequency at preoperative imaging. A similar neoplasm in the gallbladder is referred to as intracholecystic papillary neoplasm. These lesions are often diagnosed at a preinvasive stage and have a better prognosis than invasive cholangiocarcinoma when treated with curative resection, underscoring the importance of an accurate imaging diagnosis. The most common causes of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder are cholesterol polyps and adenomyomatosis. These lesions need to be differentiated from the less common but clinically important adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Imaging is crucial to identify polyps that are at high risk for malignancy so that the appropriate management choice between imaging follow-up and cholecystectomy can be made by the treating physicians. Other less common gallbladder tumors, such as gallbladder adenomas, lymphoma, and metastases to the gallbladder, can manifest as intraluminal tumors; and awareness of these lesions is also important. In this article, the recent literature is reviewed; and the imaging appearances, histopathologic findings, and management of uncommon intraluminal tumors of the bile ducts and gallbladder and their mimics are discussed. ^©RSNA, 2019.

CT diagnosis of gallbladder adenomyomatosis: importance of enhancing mucosal epithelium, the "cotton ball sign"

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic value of the cotton ball sign and other CT features in patients with gallbladder (GB) wall thickenings (WTs).

METHODS

Three blinded readers reviewed the preoperative CT and MR images of 101 patients with pathologically confirmed GB adenomyomatosis (GA) (n = 34) and other benign (n = 29), malignant (n = 41), and premalignant (n = 2) GBWTs. Three readers analysed the morphological features of GBWT and presence of the "cotton ball sign", defined as fuzzy grey dots in GBWT or a dotted outer border of the inner enhancing layer on contrast-enhanced (CE) CT. In addition, the "pearl necklace sign" on MR was analysed.

RESULTS

In the GA group (n = 34), prevalence of the cotton ball sign and pearl necklace sign was 74% (25/34) and 44% (15/34), respectively. Presence of the cotton ball sign, smooth contour of the mucosa, double-layering enhancement, and enhancement degree weaker than the renal cortex on CT images were significant predictors of benign GBWT (p < 0.01). When differentiating GA from GB malignancy or premalignancy, accuracy of the cotton ball sign and pearl necklace sign was 81% (62/77) and 74% (57/77), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The cotton ball sign on CE-CT showed higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to those of the pearl necklace sign in differentiating GA from malignancy.

KEY POINTS

• Prevalence of the cotton ball sign on CT was 74% in gallbladder adenomyomatosis. • The cotton ball sign was useful in differentiating gallbladder adenomyomatosis from gallbladder cancer. • The cotton ball sign was more sensitive than the pearl necklace sign for adenomyomatosis diagnosis.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination of the gallbladder and bile ducts: A pictorial essay

The gallbladder and bile ducts are usually assessed initially with conventional gray-scale ultrasound (US). Contrast enhanced US (CEUS) is used when a diagnosis cannot be reached with conventional US. CEUS is easy to learn and perform. US contrast agents can be safely administered in patients with renal function impairment. In this pictorial essay the physics, examination technique and indications of CEUS for examining the gallbladder and bile ducts are reviewed. Gallbladder indications include elucidating normal variants, differentiating sludge from neoplastic lesions, benign and malignant pathology, infection, wall rupture and hemobilia. In the biliary tree CEUS is used for studying benign and malignant tumors, including metastases and cholangiocarcinoma, as well as intrabiliary injection.

Imaging Evaluation of Enhancement Patterns of Flat Gall Bladder Wall Thickening and Its Correlation with Clinical and Histopathological Findings

INTRODUCTION

Gall bladder Wall Thickening (GWT) is caused by wide spectrum of diseases. Initially Ultrasound (USG) was used as imaging modality for screening of acute abdomen because of its high sensitivity and real time character. Now, Computed Tomography (CT) is used because of its high temporal and spatial resolution.

AIM

Evaluation of GWT and its enhancement patterns on contrast enhanced CT scan in a bid to differentiate benign from malignant causes and to correlate the imaging features with clinical and histopathological findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a hospital based prospective study in which USG was done as an initial modality for screening and Multi Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) scan was done later on for detailed evaluation of enhancement patterns of GWT. The study cases were then divided into five CT patterns according to enhancement patterns. The diagnostic performance of MDCT was compared with histopathological and serological findings. Relevant history, clinical examination and routine investigations were done.

RESULTS

The one layered pattern with a heterogeneously enhancing thick layered pattern (Type 1) was significantly associated with gall bladder cancer (p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of Type 1 enhancement pattern on CT for predicting the Gall Bladder (GB) malignancy were 90.476% and 97.43% respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 95% and 95%, respectively. Focal wall thickening, irregular margin character and hepatic infiltration by GWT and lymphadenopathy were other findings that predict malignancy (p-value<0.05).

CONCLUSION

MDCT enhancement patterns of a thickened GB wall and associated findings were helpful in differentiating malignant GWT from benign GWT.

Gallbladder adenomyomatosis: imaging findings, tricks and pitfalls

Abstract

Gallbladder adenomyomatosis (GA) is a benign alteration of the gallbladder wall that can be found in up to 9% of patients. GA is characterized by a gallbladder wall thickening containing small bile-filled cystic spaces (i.e., the Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses, RAS). The bile contained in RAS may undergo a progressive concentration process leading to crystal precipitation and calcification development. A correct characterization of GA is fundamental in order to avoid unnecessary cholecystectomies. Ultrasound (US) is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing GA; the use of high-frequency probes and a precise focal depth adjustment enable correct identification and characterization of GA in the majority of cases. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be performed if RAS cannot be clearly identified at baseline US: RAS appear avascular at CEUS, independently from their content. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be reserved for cases that are unclear on US and CEUS. At MRI, RAS can be identified with extremely high sensitivity, but their signal intensity varies widely according to their content. Positron emission tomography (PET) may be helpful for excluding malignancy in selected cases. Computed tomography (CT) and cholangiography are not routinely indicated in the suspicion of GA.

Teaching points

1. Gallbladder adenomyomatosis is a common benign lesion (1–9% of the patients).

2. Identification of Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses is crucial for diagnosing gallbladder adenomyomatosis.

3. Sonography is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing gallbladder adenomyomatosis.

4. Intravenous contrast material administration increases ultrasound accuracy in diagnosing gallbladder adenomyomatosis.

5. Magnetic resonance is a problem-solving technique for unclear cases.

The clothes maketh the sign

Abstract

Pattern recognition is a key tool that enables radiologists to evoke certain diagnoses based on a radiologic appearance. In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Polonius tells his son Laertes to dress well because “apparel oft proclaims the man”; this phrase is now expressed in modern parlance as “the clothes maketh the man”. Similarly in radiology, appearances are everything, and in the case of radiologic signs, occasionally “the clothes maketh the sign”. The radiologic signs described in this pictorial review resemble items of clothing, fabric types, headwear, or accessories and are found in the musculoskeletal, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems. These “clothing signs” serve as a useful visual trigger to help radiologists to identify particular disease entities.

Teaching Points

• Pattern recognition enables radiologists to evoke a diagnosis based on radiologic appearance.

• The radiologic signs described in this review resemble clothing, fabric, or accessories.

• These “clothing signs” serve as visual triggers that evoke particular disease entities.

Three-Dimensional Sonography of Biliary Tract Disorders

In this pictorial essay, we review the 3-dimensional sonographic appearance of the normal gallbladder and biliary tree, as well as the appearance of congenital and acquired biliary tract disorders. Using examples, we demonstrate the advantage of 3-dimensional scanning compared with 2-dimensional sonography and, even in certain cases, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Negative signals for adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder upon diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2-weighted image fusion analysis

Differentiation between adenomyomatosis (ADM) and cancer of the gallbladder is necessary during diagnosis. Diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) images are able to indicate cancer and inflammation. The fusion of a DWIBS with a T2 weighted image (DWIBS/T2) facilitates both functional and anatomical investigations. In the present study, patient records and images from patients with surgically confirmed ADM from April 2012 to October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The enrolled patients, including 6 men (64.2±13.1 years) and 4 women (57.3±12.4 years) were subjected to DWIBS/T2 during routine clinical practice. The diagnosis of ADM was based on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, transabdominal ultrasonography, and endoscopic ultrasonography; ADM was diagnosed definitively when cystic lesions were observed, indicating the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinus. A single patient was indicated to be positive by DWIBS/T2 imaging. The Rokitansky-Aschoff sinus revealed a relatively high signal intensity; however, it was not as strong as that of the spleen. The signal intensity was also high on an apparent diffusion coefficient map, suggesting T2 shine-through. The thickened wall displayed low signal intensity. The aforementioned results indicate that ADM may be negative upon DWIBS/T2 imaging; one false positive case was determined to be ADM, accompanied by chronic cholecystitis. The majority of patients with ADM displayed negative findings upon DWIBS/T2 imaging, and chronic cholecystitis may cause false positives.

A literature review of radiological findings to guide the diagnosis of gallbladder adenomyomatosis

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder adenomyomatosis (GA) is a benign gallbladder entity discovered as an asymptomatic gallbladder mass. Since gallbladder cancer is in the differential diagnosis for gallbladder masses, the ability to differentiate benign disease avoids a more extensive oncologic resection. This study sought to review imaging modalities used to diagnose GA.

METHODS

PubMed and SciVerse Scopus were systematically searched using the terms: "gallbladder adenomyomatosis" and "gallbladder imaging" for articles published between January 2000 and January 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 14 articles were reviewed in this analysis. Contemporary series report the use of ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in GA imaging. Ultrasound detection of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses, visualized as small cystic spaces with associated "comet-tail" or "twinkling" artifact, is pathognomonic for GA. A "Pearl-Necklace" sign of small connected sinuses on MRI or "Rosary" sign on CT are additional characteristics that may assist in establishing a diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound is the most commonly used tool to investigate GA. If not diagnostic, CT or MRI are effective in attempting to differentiate a benign or malignant cholecystic mass. Characteristic signs should lead the surgeon to perform a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in symptomatic patients or manage non-operatively in asymptomatic patients.

Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: disease spectrum with pathologic correlation

Gallbladder polyps are seen on as many as 7% of gallbladder ultrasonographic images. The differential diagnosis for a polypoid gallbladder mass is wide and includes pseudotumors, as well as benign and malignant tumors. Tumefactive sludge may be mistaken for a gallbladder polyp. Pseudotumors include cholesterol polyps, adenomyomatosis, and inflammatory polyps, and they occur in that order of frequency. The most common benign and malignant tumors are adenomas and primary adenocarcinoma, respectively. Polyp size, shape, and other ancillary imaging findings, such as a wide base, wall thickening, and coexistent gallstones, are pertinent items to report when gallbladder polyps are discovered. These findings, as well as patient age and risk factors for gallbladder cancer, guide clinical decision making. Symptomatic polyps without other cause for symptoms, an age over 50 years, and the presence of gallstones are generally considered indications for cholecystectomy. Incidentally noted pedunculated polyps smaller than 5 mm generally do not require follow-up. Polyps that are 6-10 mm require follow-up, although neither the frequency nor the length of follow-up has been established. Polyps that are larger than 10 mm are typically excised, although lower size thresholds for cholecystectomy may be considered for patients with increased risk for gallbladder carcinoma, such as patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

MR imaging of the biliary system

Although ultrasound, computed tomography, and cholescintigraphy play essential roles in the evaluation of suspected biliary abnormalities, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography can be used to evaluate inconclusive findings and provide a comprehensive noninvasive assessment of the biliary tract and gallbladder. This article reviews standard MR and MR cholangiopancreatography techniques, clinical applications, and pitfalls. Normal biliary anatomy and variants are discussed, particularly as they pertain to preoperative planning. A spectrum of benign and malignant biliary processes is reviewed, emphasizing MR findings that aid in characterization.

Differentiating between adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer: revisiting a comparative study of high-resolution ultrasound, multidetector CT, and MR imaging

Objective

To compare the diagnostic performance of high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) with contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to differentiate between adenomyomatosis (ADM) and gallbladder cancer (GBCA).

Materials and Methods

Forty patients with surgically proven ADM (n = 13) or GBCA at stage T2 or lower (n = 27) who previously underwent preoperative HRUS, contrast-enhanced CT, and contrast-enhanced MRI with MRCP were retrospectively included in this study. According to the well-known diagnostic criteria, two reviewers independently analyzed the images from each modality separately with a five-point confidence scale. The interobserver agreement was calculated using weighted κ statistics. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each modality when scores of 1 or 2 indicated ADM.

Results

The interobserver agreement between the two reviewers was good to excellent. The mean Az values for HRUS, multidetector CT (MDCT), and MRI were 0.959, 0.898, and 0.935, respectively, without any statistically significant differences between any of the modalities (p > 0.05). The mean sensitivity of MRI with MRCP (80.8%) was significantly higher than that of MDCT (50.0%) (p = 0.0215). However, the mean sensitivity of MRI with MRCP (80.8%) was not significantly different from that of HRUS (73.1%) (p > 0.05). The mean specificities and accuracies among the three modalities were not significantly different (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

High-resolution ultrasound and MRI with MRCP have comparable sensitivity and accuracy and MDCT has the lowest sensitivity and accuracy for the differentiation of ADM and GBCA.

Neonatal adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: An incidental finding at 12 hours of life

Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder, although relatively common in adults, is a rare entity in the pediatric age group. Controversy still exists as to whether or not to perform followup ultrasound, as there is a questionable increased risk of gallbladder carcinoma in adults. We present a case of neonatal adenomyomatosis that was diagnosed at 12 hours of life in a term newborn.

Stepwise approach and surgery for gallbladder adenomyomatosis: a mini-review

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder adenomyomatosis (GBA) is a hyperplastic disease affecting the wall of the gallbladder, with some typical features. It has historically been considered a benign condition, nevertheless recent reports highlighted a potential role of GBA in predisposing to malignancies of the gallbladder.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed the literature concerning GBA from its identification until July 2012. Owing to the relative rarity of the disease, studies often are case reports or case series. Thus we herein report a summary of the key-points concerning diagnosis and treatment of GBA, easily applicable in everyday practice, rather than a systematic review. Also, results are integrated with our recent experience.

RESULTS

In our experience, we observed a trend toward an increase of GBA during the last years, probably due to enhanced ultrasonographic technical advancements and physician's expertise. GBA has distinctive imaging features. Several recent reports highlight the potential risk of cancer associated with GBA; however the disease is still classified as a benign condition. Although its correlation with malignancy has not been demonstrated, it is prudent to recommend cholecystectomy in some cases. However, in selected asymptomatic patients, a wait-and-see policy is a viable alternative. We propose an algorithm, based on GBA pathological pattern (diffuse, segmental, localized or fundal), suitable for decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

In symptomatic patients and if the diagnosis is doubtful, cholecystectomy is mandatory. Postponing surgery is an option to be offered to asymptomatic patients with low-risk GBA pattern who adhere to scheduled follow-ups.

Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the additional diagnostic value of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) compared to conventional biliary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating gallbladder (GB) cancer from benign GB diseases with wall thickening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with GB cancers and 36 patients with cholecystitis having preoperative biliary MRIs were included. All patients underwent unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), Gd-enhanced dynamic MRI, and DWI (b values 0, 100, 500, 1000 s/mm(2) ). Two radiologists independently analyzed two sets of MRI for characterization of GB lesions: a conventional biliary image (CBI) set with T1- and T2WI and a dynamic image; and a DWI set composed of DWI and a CBI set. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were evaluated using the receiver operator characteristic method. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the lesions were also calculated.

RESULTS

The Az values were 0.856 and 0.960 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively, with the CBI set and increased to 0.952 and 0.983 with the DWI set. The mean ADC value of GB carcinoma was 1.46 ± 0.45 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s and that of cholecysititis was 2.16 ± 0.56 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Adding DWI to the standard biliary MRI protocol may improve sensitivity for distinguishing GB cancers from benign GB diseases with wall thickening.

Differentiation of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder from early-stage, wall-thickening-type gallbladder cancer using high-resolution ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of transabdominal high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) for differentiation of adenomyomatosis from early-stage, wall-thickening-type gallbladder (GB) cancer.

METHODS

HRUS was defined as the addition of high megahertz imaging to conventional low megahertz imaging with use of state-of-the-art imaging technology. HRUS findings were retrospectively compared in 45 patients with adenomyomatosis and 28 patients with stage T1/T2 wall-thickening-type GB cancer. For evaluating HRUS performance in the differential diagnosis of adenomyomatosis from GB cancer, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used with a five-point confidence scale independently scored by three blinded radiologists who also analysed morphological abnormalities.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A (z)) values of HRUS in the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis were 0.948, 0.915 and 0.917 for reviewers 1, 2 and 3. Symmetrical wall thickening, intramural cystic spaces, intramural echogenic foci and twinkling artefacts were significantly associated with adenomyomatosis (P < 0.05), whereas irregular thickening of the outer wall, focal innermost hyperechoic layer (IHL) discontinuity, IHL irregularity, IHL thickening greater than 1 mm, loss of multilayer pattern in the GB wall, and intralesional vascularity were significantly associated with cancer (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of intramural cystic spaces/echogenic foci for the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis were 80.0 %, 85.7 % and 82.2 %.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that HRUS can be helpful for distinguishing adenomyomatosis from early-stage, wall-thickening-type GB cancer.

The varying faces of gall bladder carcinoma: pictorial essay

The objective of this review is to highlight the pertinent imaging features and potential pitfalls in the diagnosis and staging of gall bladder carcinoma. This condition is notoriously non-specific on imaging on many occasions, particularly in its early stages; gall bladder carcinoma shows numerous features that overlap with a large number of benign conditions, leading to delayed diagnosis and incurable disease. Radiologists should be familiar with its typical and atypical imaging features.

Case report of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, review of its sonographic and magnetic resonance findings, and distinction from other gallbladder pathology

A case of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis is presented with a brief review of its sonographic and magnetic resonance features. These imaging features are also compared to those seen in gallbladder adenomyomatosis and gallbladder carcinoma. While there are many overlapping imaging findings in these entities, it is important to recognize distinguishing characteristics so a correct surgical approach is chosen. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy attempted with existing xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis has an increased surgical complication rate compared to open cholecystectomy and often necessitates intraoperative conversion to open cholecystectomy.