1
|
Patel-Lippmann KK, Wasnik AP, Akin EA, Andreotti RF, Ascher SM, Brook OR, Eskander RN, Feldman MK, Jones LP, Martino MA, Patel MD, Patlas MN, Revzin MA, VanBuren W, Yashar CM, Kang SK. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms: 2023 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:S79-S99. [PMID: 38823957 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Asymptomatic adnexal masses are commonly encountered in daily radiology practice. Although the vast majority of these masses are benign, a small subset have a risk of malignancy, which require gynecologic oncology referral for best treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, using a combination of both transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex Doppler technique can accurately characterize the majority of these lesions. MRI with and without contrast is a useful complementary modality that can help characterize indeterminate lesions and assess the risk of malignancy is those that are suspicious. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Esma A Akin
- The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | | - Susan M Ascher
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Olga R Brook
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ramez N Eskander
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | | | - Lisa P Jones
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Martin A Martino
- Ascension St. Vincent's, Jacksonville, Florida; University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, Gynecologic oncologist
| | | | - Michael N Patlas
- Department of Medical Imaging, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margarita A Revzin
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Committee on Emergency Radiology-GSER
| | | | - Catheryn M Yashar
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California; Commission on Radiation Oncology
| | - Stella K Kang
- Specialty Chair, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lasher A, Harris LE, Solomon AL, Harbin LM, Raby L, Dietrich CS, Kryscio RJ, van Nagell JR, Pavlik EJ. Variables Associated With Resolution and Persistence of Ovarian Cysts. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142:1293-1301. [PMID: 38051292 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate surveillance intervals of incident ovarian cysts, and describe variables associated with cyst resolution times. METHODS The UK-OCST (University of Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial) was a prospective cohort that enrolled 47,762 individuals over 30 years, including 2,638 individuals with incident cysts. Cyst diameter and structure and patient age, body mass index, use of hormone therapy (HT), family history of ovarian cancer, and menopausal status were examined as variables associated with cyst resolution using t tests, χ 2 test, Kaplan Meier, and Cox multiple regression. RESULTS Of 2,638 individuals with incident cysts, 1,667 experienced resolution (63.2%) within 1.2 years, and 971 experienced persistence (36.8%). Within 1 year, unilocular and septated cysts had similar resolution rates (35.4% and 36.7%, respectively, P >.05), but time to resolution was shorter for unilocular cysts compared with septated cysts (mean 1.89 years vs 2.58 years, respectively, P <.001). Both unilocular and septated cysts smaller than 3 cm resolved faster than cysts larger than 6 cm ( P <.001). Variables associated with percent resolution included being of younger age, premenopausal status (but not for synchronous bilateral cysts), and those reporting a family history of ovarian cancer ( P <.05). Variables associated with a faster cyst resolution rate included being older than age 70 years and not using hormone therapy. Body mass index and family history were not associated with cyst resolution time. CONCLUSION Different surveillance times may be appropriate depending on cyst structure and size and patient age and HT use. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04473833.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Lasher
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine and the Department of Statistics and the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leng X, Kou S, Lin Y, Hagemann AR, Hagemann IS, Thaker PH, Kuroki LM, McCourt CK, Mutch DG, Siegel C, Powell MA, Zhu Q. Quantification of ovarian lesion and fallopian tube vasculature using optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15850. [PMID: 36151126 PMCID: PMC9508221 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19778-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The heterogeneity in the pathological and clinical manifestations of ovarian cancer is a major hurdle impeding early and accurate diagnosis. A host of imaging modalities, including Doppler ultrasound, MRI, and CT, have been investigated to improve the assessment of ovarian lesions. We hypothesized that pathologic conditions might affect the ovarian vasculature and that these changes might be detectable by optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM). In our previous work, we developed a benchtop OR-PAM and demonstrated it on a limited set of ovarian and fallopian tube specimens. In this study, we collected data from over 50 patients, supporting a more robust statistical analysis. We then developed an efficient custom analysis pipeline for characterizing the vascular features of the samples, including the mean vessel diameter, vascular density, global vascular directionality, local vascular definition, and local vascular tortuosity/branchedness. Phantom studies using carbon fibers showed that our algorithm was accurate within an acceptable error range. Between normal ovaries and normal fallopian tubes, we observed significant differences in five of six extracted vascular features. Further, we showed that distinct subsets of vascular features could distinguish normal ovaries from cystic, fibrous, and malignant ovarian lesions. In addition, a statistically significant difference was found in the mean vascular tortuosity/branchedness values of normal and abnormal tubes. The findings support the proposition that OR-PAM can help distinguish the severity of tubal and ovarian pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiandong Leng
- Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Sitai Kou
- Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Yixiao Lin
- Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Andrea R Hagemann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Ian S Hagemann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.,Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Premal H Thaker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Lindsay M Kuroki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Carolyn K McCourt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - David G Mutch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Cary Siegel
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Quing Zhu
- Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. .,Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen H, Yang BW, Qian L, Meng YS, Bai XH, Hong XW, He X, Jiang MJ, Yuan F, Du QW, Feng WW. Deep Learning Prediction of Ovarian Malignancy at US Compared with O-RADS and Expert Assessment. Radiology 2022; 304:106-113. [PMID: 35412367 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Deep learning (DL) algorithms could improve the classification of ovarian tumors assessed with multimodal US. Purpose To develop DL algorithms for the automated classification of benign versus malignant ovarian tumors assessed with US and to compare algorithm performance to Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and subjective expert assessment for malignancy. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive women with ovarian tumors undergoing gray scale and color Doppler US from January 2019 to November 2019. Histopathologic analysis was the reference standard. The data set was divided into training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) sets. Algorithms modified from residual network (ResNet) with two fusion strategies (feature fusion [hereafter, DLfeature] or decision fusion [hereafter, DLdecision]) were developed. DL prediction of malignancy was compared with O-RADS risk categorization and expert assessment by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis in the test set. Results A total of 422 women (mean age, 46.4 years ± 14.8 [SD]) with 304 benign and 118 malignant tumors were included; there were 337 women in the training and validation data set and 85 women in the test data set. DLfeature had an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.97) for classifying malignant from benign ovarian tumors, comparable with O-RADS (AUC, 0.92; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.97; P = .88) and expert assessment (AUC, 0.97; 95% CI: 0.91, 0.99; P = .07), and similar to DLdecision (AUC, 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.96; P = .29). DLdecision, DLfeature, O-RADS, and expert assessment achieved sensitivities of 92%, 92%, 92%, and 96%, respectively, and specificities of 80%, 85%, 89%, and 87%, respectively, for malignancy. Conclusion Deep learning algorithms developed by using multimodal US images may distinguish malignant from benign ovarian tumors with diagnostic performance comparable to expert subjective and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System assessment. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Chen
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Bo-Wen Yang
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Le Qian
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Yi-Shuang Meng
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Xiang-Hui Bai
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Xiao-Wei Hong
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Xin He
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Mei-Jiao Jiang
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Fei Yuan
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Qin-Wen Du
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| | - Wei-Wei Feng
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.C., B.W.Y., L.Q., X.H., M.J.J., Q.W.D., W.W.F.) and Department of Pathology (F.Y.), Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200025, China; and Philips Research Asia Shanghai, Shanghai, China (Y.S.M., X.H.B., X.W.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Friedrich L, Meyer R, Levin G. Management of adnexal mass: A comparison of five national guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 265:80-89. [PMID: 34474226 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES General gynecologists are often the first to face a newly diagnosed adnexal mass. Bothering mass symptoms, fertility issues, and the effect of a possible surgical intervention on fertility in term of mechanical factor and ovarian follicular reserve are all considerations that should be accounted for. This study summarizes and compares five different adnexal mass management guidelines, enabling clinicians to peruse consensus and controversy issues, thus choosing the optimal management method. DESIGN We retrieved, reviewed and compared the most recent national guidelines of adnexal mass management from the national societies of the United States (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists), England (the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists), Canada (the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada), Australia (the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners), and France (French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians). RESULTS There is a broad consensus regarding the role of transvaginal ultrasound as part of the initial evaluation of an adnexal mass and the radiological characteristics suggesting it being malignant. The role of transabdominal ultrasound or doppler mode is controversial. The use of MRI in cases of indeterminate adnexal masses is widely accepted. Ultrasound-guided aspiration is generally not recommended. There is a broad consensus that CA-125 should not be used as an ovarian cancer disease screening tool, though its role in the initial evaluation of adnexal masses is controversial. Risk prediction models are generally accepted, particularly the 'International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules' and the 'Risk of Malignancy Index'. CONCLUSION Adnexal mass management national guidelines, though similar, had noticeable variations in the content, references cited, and recommendations made. While this variation might raise a concern as to the reproducibility of synthesizing literature, it can help practitioners present all spectra of recommendations and available data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lior Friedrich
- The Joyce & Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
| | - Raanan Meyer
- The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Gabriel Levin
- The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delgado Bolton RC, Aide N, Colletti PM, Ferrero A, Paez D, Skanjeti A, Giammarile F. EANM guideline on the role of 2-[ 18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, prognostic value, therapy assessment and restaging of ovarian cancer, endorsed by the American College of Nuclear Medicine (ACNM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:3286-3302. [PMID: 34215923 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05450-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
In most patients with ovarian carcinoma, the diagnosis is reached when the disease is long past the initial stages, presenting already an advanced stage, and they usually have a very bad prognosis. Cytoreductive or debulking surgical procedures, platinum-based chemotherapy and targeted agents are key therapeutic elements. However, around 7 out of 10 patients present recurrent disease within 36 months from the initial diagnosis. The metastatic spread in ovarian cancer follows three pathways: contiguous dissemination across the peritoneum, dissemination through the lymphatic drainage and, although less importantly in this case, through the bloodstream. Radiological imaging, including ultrasound, CT and MRI, are the main imaging techniques in which management decisions are supported, CT being considered the best available technique for presurgical evaluation and staging purposes. Regarding 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT, the evidence available in the literature demonstrates efficacy in primary detection, disease staging and establishing the prognosis and especially for relapse detection. There is limited evidence when considering the evaluation of therapeutic response. This guideline summarizes the level of evidence and grade of recommendation for the clinical indications of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in each disease stage of ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto C Delgado Bolton
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital San Pedro and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), La Rioja, Logroño, Spain.
| | - Nicolas Aide
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.,INSERM U1086 ANTICIPE, Normandie Université, Caen, France
| | - Patrick M Colletti
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Annamaria Ferrero
- Academic Division Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Torino, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Diana Paez
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Skanjeti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Francesco Giammarile
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Notohamiprodjo S, Varasteh Z, Beer AJ, Niu G, Chen X(S, Weber W, Schwaiger M. Tumor Vasculature. Mol Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-816386-3.00090-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
8
|
Khalaf LMR, Desoky HHM, Seifeldein GS, Salah A, Amine MA, Hussien MT. Sonographic and Doppler predictors of malignancy in ovarian lesions. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-020-00172-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To determine the best sonographic (US) and/or Doppler features that the radiologist can use as predictors or risk factors for ovarian malignancy
Results
Among the examined 156 ovarian lesions, there were 53 malignant and 103 benign lesions. Most of the malignant ovarian lesions were noted in older age than in benign lesions p < 0.001. Majority of the malignant lesions had non-hyperechoic solid component (92.5%); it had the highest sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 97%, accuracy of 94.8%, positive predictive value of 94%, negative predictive value of 96%, and AUC of 0.94 in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian lesions. The presence of papillary projection, the absence of wall definitions and thick wall, and thick septation were noted in 83%, 81%, and 53.8% of the malignant ovarian lesions respectively. Color flow Doppler shows neovascularity in 88.7% of the malignant lesions, 73.6% of them has central blood flow. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that the presence of non-hyperechoic solid component, new vascularity with central location of the blood flow, papillary projection, thick septa, and old age were the most significant parameters in predicting ovarian cancer in decreasing order of frequency according to their odds ratio (19.45, 7.55, 4.56, 3.45, and 1.45, respectively).
Conclusions
The non-hyperechoic solid component, new vascularity with central location of the blood flow, papillary projection, and thick septa were the most significant and consistent US and Doppler predictors of ovarian malignancy in addition to one clinical feature which is the old age ≥ 52 years.
Collapse
|
9
|
HORTU İ, KOCAOĞLU G, ALGÜL F, SERİN G, AKDEMİR A. Adneksiyal kitleyi taklit eden ileum kökenli gastrointestinal stromal tümör. EGE TIP DERGISI 2020. [DOI: 10.19161/etd.790590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
10
|
ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 16:S77-S93. [PMID: 31054761 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
There are approximately 9.1 pelvic surgeries performed for every histologically confirmed adnexal malignancy in the United States, compared to 2.3 surgeries per malignancy (in oncology centers) and 5.9 surgeries per malignancy (in other centers) in Europe. An important prognostic factor in the long-term survival in patients with ovarian malignancy is the initial management by a gynecological oncologist. With high accuracy of imaging for adnexal mass characterization and consequent appropriate triage to subspecialty referral, the better use of gynecologic oncology can improve treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, including transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex ultrasound, combined with MRI with contrast can diagnose adnexal masses as benign with specific features (ie, functional masses, dermoid, endometrioma, fibroma, pedunculated fibroid, hydrosalpinx, peritoneal inclusion cyst, Tarlov cyst), malignant, or indeterminate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
|
11
|
Chambers LM, Esakov E, Braley C, AlHilli M, Michener C, Reizes O. Use of Transabdominal Ultrasound for the detection of intra-peritoneal tumor engraftment and growth in mouse xenografts of epithelial ovarian cancer. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0228511. [PMID: 32348309 PMCID: PMC7190129 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate intraperitoneal (IP) tumor engraftment, metastasis and growth in a pre-clinical murine epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) model using both transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and bioluminescence in vivo imaging system (IVIS). METHODS Ten female C57Bl/6J mice at six weeks of age were included in this study. Five mice underwent IP injection of 5x106 ID8-luc cells (+ D- luciferin) and the remaining five mice underwent IP injection of ID8-VEGF cells. Monitoring of tumor growth and ascites was performed weekly starting at seven days post-injection until study endpoint. ID8-luc mice were monitored using both TAUS and IVIS, and ID8-VEGF mice underwent TAUS monitoring only. Individual tumor implant dimension and total tumor volume were calculated. Average luminescent intensity was calculated and reported per mouse abdomen. Tumor detection was confirmed by gross evaluation and histopathology. All data are presented as mean +/- standard deviation. RESULTS Overall, tumors were successfully detected in all ten mice using TAUS and IVIS, and tumor detection correlated with terminal endpoint histology/ H&E staining. For TAUS, the smallest confirmed tumor measurements were at seven days post-injection with mean long axis of 2.23mm and mean tumor volume of 4.17mm3. However, IVIS imaging was able to detect tumor growth at 14 days post-injection. Ascites formation was detected in mice at 21 days post-injection. CONCLUSIONS TAUS is highly discriminatory for monitoring EOC in pre-clinical murine model, allowing for detection of tumor dimension as small as 2 mm and as early as seven days post-injection compared to IVIS. In addition, TAUS provides relevant information for ascites development and detection of multiple small metastatic tumor implants. TAUS provides an accurate and reliable method to detect and monitor IP EOC growth in mouse xenografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Chambers
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Emily Esakov
- Department of Cardiovascular and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Chad Braley
- Department of Cardiovascular and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Mariam AlHilli
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Chad Michener
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Ofer Reizes
- Department of Cardiovascular and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khalaf LMR, Desoky HHM, Seifeldein GS, El-Sharkawy M, Sayed MM, Ahmed S, Rezk K, Hussien MT. The diagnostic efficacy of Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS): single-center prospective cross-sectional study. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-019-0071-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To assess the validity and accuracy of GI-RADS classification in the prediction of malignancy and in triaging the management protocol in ovarian lesions.
Results
One hundred fifty-six ovarian lesions were detected in the examined 116 women. The prevalence of malignant tumors was 44%. Overall GI-RADS classification rates were as follows: 41 cases (26.3%) were classified as GI-RADS 1, 26 cases (16 .7%) as GI-RADS 2, 34 cases (21.8%) as GI-RADS 3, 14 cases (8.9%) as GI-RADS 4, and 41 cases (26.3%) as GI-RADS 5. No follow-up was done in GI-RADS 1 patients. A final diagnosis of all GI-RADS 2 ovarian masses such as functional cyst (n = 10), hemorrhagic cysts (n = 8), corpus luteal cysts (n = 6), and some GI-RADS 3 as simple cysts (n = 10) was made by spontaneous resolution of these masses at follow-up after 6 weeks. Fifteen cases of GI-RADS 3 as mature teratoma, serous and mucinous cystadenoma, endometrioma, and ovarian torsion and all GI-RADS 4 and 5 underwent laparoscopic or surgical removal of the ovarian mass with histopathological examination. The diagnostic performance of the GI-RADS in predicting the risk of malignancy in ovarian masses was as follows: 98.11% sensitivity, 95.15% specificity, 91.2% positive predictive value (PPV), 99.2% negative predictive value (NPV), and 20.2 positive likelihood ratio, and the overall accuracy was 96.2% (area under receiver operating curve (AUC) = 0.96, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
GI-RADS classification performs well as a reporting system of the ovarian masses with high diagnostic performance in the prediction of malignancy, and it seems to be a helpful tool in triaging management in patients with ovarian masses.
Trial registration
The trial was registered in the US National Library of Medicine, under clinical trial number NCT03175991. Also, the ethical committee approval number of the Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, was 17100016 on February 28, 2017.
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules to Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Guidelines for Detection of Malignancy in Adnexal Cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 214:694-700. [PMID: 31770022 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) guidelines for detecting ovarian malignancy in a general population of women presenting to radiology departments with adnexal cystic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective multicenter study of ultrasound-detected adnexal cystic lesions with appropriate follow-up was conducted. Lesions were classified into benign, indeterminate, or malignant categories according to criteria based on the IOTA simple rules and the SRU guidelines. The prevalence of nonneoplastic cysts, neoplasms, and malignant tumors was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated, and ROC analysis for the diagnosis of malignancy was performed. RESULTS. A total of 697 women with 764 cystic lesions were included; 85.2% (651/764) of the lesions were nonneoplastic, 12.2% (93/764) were benign neoplasms, and 2.6% (20/764) were malignant neoplasms. Nearly all malignancies were classified into indeterminate and malignant categories. The prevalence of malignancy in the indeterminate category was 4.8% (7/145) (SRU) to 10.7% (7/65) (IOTA) and in the malignant category was 18.1% (13/72) (SRU) to 34.3% (12/35) (IOTA). Only one malignancy was misclassified as benign by the IOTA simple rules. The sensitivity of the IOTA simple rules for malignancy was 90.0%; specificity, 96.5%; PPV, 29.0%; NPV, 99.8%; and accuracy, 96.4%. The corresponding values for the SRU guidelines were 100%, 89.6%, 14.9%, 100%, and 89.8%. In ROC analysis, the IOTA simple rules were slightly more accurate than the SRU guidelines (AUC, 0.9805 versus 0.9713; p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION. Both imaging characterization methods were sensitive for identifying ovarian malignancies, but the PPV was low among women presenting to radiology departments, and the indeterminate classification harbored one-third of the total malignancies. Exploration of varied clinical settings and inclusion of secondary tests may help to refine these systems.
Collapse
|
14
|
Elezaby M, Lees B, Maturen KE, Barroilhet L, Wisinski KB, Schrager S, Wilke LG, Sadowski E. BRCA Mutation Carriers: Breast and Ovarian Cancer Screening Guidelines and Imaging Considerations. Radiology 2019; 291:554-569. [PMID: 31038410 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019181814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Patients who carry the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations have an underlying genetic predisposition for breast and ovarian cancers. These deleterious genetic mutations are the most common genes implicated in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. This monograph summarizes the evidence behind current screening recommendations, reviews imaging protocols specific to this patient population, and illustrates some of the imaging nuances of breast and ovarian cancers in this clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Elezaby
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Brittany Lees
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Lisa Barroilhet
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Kari B Wisinski
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Sarina Schrager
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Lee G Wilke
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| | - Elizabeth Sadowski
- From the Department of Radiology (M.E., E.S.), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (B.L., E.S.), Division of Gynecologic Oncology (L.B.), Department of Medicine (K.B.W.), Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center (K.B.W.), Department of Family Medicine and Community Health (S.S.), and Department of Surgery (L.G.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich (K.E.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rubello D, Marzola MC, Colletti PM. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
16
|
Can Presurgical Ultrasound Predict Survival in Women With Ovarian Masses? Ultrasound Q 2018; 35:39-44. [PMID: 30516730 DOI: 10.1097/ruq.0000000000000401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to determine the ability of ultrasound to predict survival and detect more aggressive tumors in women with ovarian masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained. A total of 167 patients who presented with adnexal mass/masses were included. These were documented as benign or malignant on ultrasound. Age, date of diagnosis and date of death, type of tumor, and tumor marker cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) values were recorded. A CA-125 value of less than 35 U/mL was considered normal. All cases underwent surgery. Pathologic findings were considered as reference standard. The 2 × 2 cross-tabulations were used to correlate dichotomized CA-125, US diagnosis (benign vs malignant), and pathologic status. Difference of distributions was tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and their association was tested using the Fisher exact test. All tests were 2-sided, and P values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meir curves were generated to estimate survival. RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference in patients with benign versus malignant tumors based on pathology (P < 0.0001) and ultrasound (P < 0.0003). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of ultrasound were 55%, 86%, 90% and 46%, and 81%. Patients diagnosed as having malignant tumors based on ultrasound had statistically significant worse overall survival. Probability of survival based on pathologic diagnosis of malignancy was statistically significant at P < 0.0003; based on ultrasound, P < 0.0001; and based on CA-125, P < 0.041. CONCLUSION Patients who had ultrasound-based prediction of ovarian malignancy had overall worse survival probability (P < 0.0001) compared with CA-125- or pathology-based prediction.
Collapse
|
17
|
Rubello D, Marzola MC, Colletti PM. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2018; 38:50-51. [PMID: 30391285 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2018.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D Rubello
- Nuclear Medicine & PET Unit, Department of Molecular Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, NeuroRadiology and Clinical Pathology, Rovigo Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
| | - M C Marzola
- Nuclear Medicine & PET Unit, Department of Molecular Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, NeuroRadiology and Clinical Pathology, Rovigo Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - P M Colletti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, EE.UU
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Andreotti RF, Timmerman D, Benacerraf BR, Bennett GL, Bourne T, Brown DL, Coleman BG, Frates MC, Froyman W, Goldstein SR, Hamper UM, Horrow MM, Hernanz-Schulman M, Reinhold C, Strachowski LM, Glanc P. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Lexicon for Ultrasound: A White Paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:1415-1429. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
19
|
Adnexal lesions: Imaging strategies for ultrasound and MR imaging. Diagn Interv Imaging 2018; 100:635-646. [PMID: 30177450 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Adnexal lesions are routinely encountered in general practice. Ultrasound is the first line of investigation in determining the benign or malignant potential of an adnexal lesion. In the cases of classic simple cysts, hemorrhagic cysts, endometriomas, dermoids and obviously malignant lesions, ultrasound may be sufficient for management recommendations. In cases where there is an isolated adnexal lesion, without peritoneal disease or serum CA-125 elevation, and in lesions considered indeterminate on ultrasound, MR imaging with incorporation of the ADNEx MR score can increase the specificity for the diagnosis of benignity or malignancy. This article will review the imaging evaluation of adnexal lesions and how to incorporate the ADNEx MR score to help guide clinical management.
Collapse
|
20
|
Di Lorenzo G, Ricci G, Severini GM, Romano F, Biffi S. Imaging and therapy of ovarian cancer: clinical application of nanoparticles and future perspectives. Theranostics 2018; 8:4279-4294. [PMID: 30214620 PMCID: PMC6134923 DOI: 10.7150/thno.26345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite significant advances in cancer diagnostics and treatment, ovarian cancers (OC) continue to kill more than 150,000 women every year worldwide. Due to the relatively asymptomatic nature and the advanced stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis, OC is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. The current treatment for advanced OC relies on the synergistic effect of combining surgical cytoreduction and chemotherapy; however, beside the fact that chemotherapy resistance is a major challenge in OC management, new imaging strategies are needed to target microscopic lesions and improve both cytoreductive surgery and patient outcomes. In this context, nanostructured probes are emerging as a new class of medical tool that can simultaneously provide imaging contrast, target tumor cells, and carry a wide range of medicines resulting in better diagnosis and therapeutic precision. Herein we summarize several exemplary efforts in nanomedicine for addressing unmet clinical needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Stefania Biffi
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Seratlić J, Radović - Janošević D, Krtinić D. THE ROLE OF SERUM LEVEL OF TUMOR MARKER CA 125 IN DISTINGUISHING BENIG N FROM MALIGNANT OVA RIAN TUMORS IN POSTMENOPU SUAL WOMEN AND CORRELATION WITH SON OGRAPHIC FINDING. ACTA MEDICA MEDIANAE 2018. [DOI: 10.5633/amm.2018.0209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
22
|
A systematic approach to adnexal masses discovered on ultrasound: the ADNEx MR scoring system. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:679-695. [PMID: 28900696 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1272-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Adnexal lesions are a common occurrence in radiology practice and imaging plays a crucial role in triaging women appropriately. Current trends toward early detection and characterization have increased the need for accurate imaging assessment of adnexal lesions prior to treatment. Ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality for assessing adnexal lesions; however, approximately 20% of lesions are incompletely characterized after ultrasound evaluation. Secondary assessment with MR imaging using the ADNEx MR Scoring System has been demonstrated as highly accurate in the characterization of adnexal lesions and in excluding ovarian cancer. This review will address the role of MR imaging in further assessment of adnexal lesions discovered on US, and the utility of the ADNEx MR Scoring System.
Collapse
|
23
|
Le T, Giede C. No. 230-Initial Evaluation and Referral Guidelines for Management of Pelvic/Ovarian Masses. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
24
|
Archivée: N° 230-Prise en charge des masses pelviennes / ovariennes : Évaluation initiale et lignes directrices quant à l'orientation des patientes. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
25
|
Mathieu KB, Bedi DG, Thrower SL, Qayyum A, Bast RC. Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2018; 51. [PMID: 28639753 PMCID: PMC5788737 DOI: 10.1002/uog.17557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
The United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) recently reported a reduction in the average overall mortality among ovarian cancer patients screened with an annual sequential, multimodal strategy that tracked biomarker CA125 over time, where increasing serum CA125 levels prompted ultrasound. However, multiple cases were documented wherein serum CA125 levels were rising, but ultrasound screens were normal, thus delaying surgical intervention. A significant factor which could contribute to false negatives is that many aggressive ovarian cancers are believed to arise from epithelial cells on the fimbriae of the fallopian tubes, which are not readily imaged. Moreover, because only a fraction of metastatic tumors may reach a sonographically-detectable size before they metastasize, annual screening with ultrasound may fail to detect a large fraction of early-stage ovarian cancers. The ability to detect ovarian carcinomas before they metastasize is critical and future efforts towards improving screening should focus on identifying unique features specific to aggressive, early-stage tumors, as well as improving imaging sensitivity to allow for detection of tubal lesions. Implementation of a three-stage multimodal screening strategy in which a third modality is employed in cases where the first-line blood-based assay is positive and the second-line ultrasound exam is negative may also prove fruitful in detecting early-stage cases missed by ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K B Mathieu
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1881 East Road, Unit 1902, Houston, TX, 77054, USA
| | - D G Bedi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S L Thrower
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1881 East Road, Unit 1902, Houston, TX, 77054, USA
| | - A Qayyum
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R C Bast
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
CT Features of Ovarian Tumors: Defining Key Differences Between Serous Borderline Tumors and Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210:918-926. [PMID: 29489407 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to investigate whether the CT features of serous borderline tumors (SBTs) differ from those of low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSCs) and to evaluate if mutation status is associated with distinct CT phenotypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 59 women, 37 with SBT and 22 with LGSC, who underwent CT before primary surgical resection. Thirty of 59 patients were genetically profiled. Two radiologists (readers 1 and 2) independently and retrospectively reviewed CT examinations for qualitative features and quantified total tumor volumes (TTVs), solid tumor volumes (STVs), and solid proportion of ovarian masses. Univariate and multivariate associations of the CT features with histopathologic diagnoses and mutations were evaluated, and interreader agreement was determined. RESULTS At multivariate analysis, the presence of bilateral ovarian masses (p = 0.03), the presence of peritoneal disease (PD) (p = 0.002), and higher STV of ovarian masses (p = 0.002) were associated with LGSC. The presence of nodular PD pattern (p < 0.001 each reader) and the presence of PD calcifications (reader 1, p = 0.02; reader 2, p = 0.003) were associated with invasive peritoneal lesions (i.e., LGSC). The presence of bilateral ovarian masses (p = 0.04 each reader), PD (reader 1, p = 0.01; reader 2, p = 0.004), and higher STV (p = 0.03 for each reader) were associated with the absence of BRAF mutation (i.e., wild type [wt]-BRAF). CONCLUSION The CT features of LGSCs were distinct from those of SBTs. The CT manifestations of LGSC and the wt-BRAF phenotype were similar.
Collapse
|
27
|
Sadowski EA, Paroder V, Patel-Lippmann K, Robbins JB, Barroilhet L, Maddox E, McMahon T, Sampene E, Wasnik AP, Blaty AD, Maturen KE. Indeterminate Adnexal Cysts at US: Prevalence and Characteristics of Ovarian Cancer. Radiology 2018; 287:1041-1049. [PMID: 29480762 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the prevalence of indeterminate adnexal cysts in women presenting to academic medical centers for pelvic ultrasonography (US), determine the incidence of malignancy, and identify cyst and patient characteristics that are predictive of malignancy. Materials and Methods A multicenter study of US-detected adnexal cysts with appropriate follow-up (surgical pathologic examination, imaging and/or clinical examination) was conducted from January 2008 to June 2012. Indeterminate cysts were classified as category 1 (typical benign appearing cysts >5 cm) or category 2 (cysts with avascular solid components) on the basis of a combination of definitions in the existing literature. The incidence of neoplasms and malignant tumors was calculated. Patient and cyst characteristics associated with neoplasm and malignant tumors were evaluated with the χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the t test for continuous variables. A backward stepwise logistic regression model was performed for two outcomes: (a) the presence of any neoplasm (benign or malignant) and (b) the presence of a malignant tumor. Results There were 1637 women with an adnexal cyst at US; 391 (mean age = 41.8 years ± 13.5.1; range = 17-91 years) had an indeterminate adnexal cyst at US. The prevalence of indeterminate adnexal cysts was 23.9% (391 of 1637; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22, 0.26). Three hundred three indeterminate cysts in 280 women (mean age = 42.9 years ± 14.1; range = 17-88 years) had adequate follow-up. The incidence of ovarian neoplasms (benign and malignant) was 24.8% (75 of 303 cysts; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.30), and the incidence of malignant tumors was 3.6% (11 of 303 cysts; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.06). The proportion of ovarian neoplasms differed between category 1 and category 2 cysts (17.5% [25 of 143 cysts; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.25] vs 31.3% [50 of 160 cysts; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.39], respectively; P = .001). The proportion of malignant tumors differed between categories 1 and 2 cysts (0% [0 of 143 cysts] vs 6.9% [11 of 160 cysts; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.12]; P < .001). The presence of an avascular nodular component was a significant predictor of malignancy at stepwise logistic regression analysis (odds ratio = 2.83; P ≤ .0001; 95% CI: 1.69, 4.70). Conclusion The presence of an avascular nodular component was the most significant predictor of the presence of malignancy in indeterminate adnexal cysts. The risk of malignancy is higher with category 2 cysts than with category 1 cysts. © RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Sadowski
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Krupa Patel-Lippmann
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Jessica B Robbins
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Lisa Barroilhet
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Elizabeth Maddox
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Timothy McMahon
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Emmanuel Sampene
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Ashish P Wasnik
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Alexander D Blaty
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- From the Departments of Radiology (E.A.S., J.B.R., E.M.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (E.A.S., L.B.), and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (E.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Clinical Science Center, E3/372, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (V.P., T.M.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (K.P.L.); Department of Radiology (A.P.W., A.D.B., K.E.M.) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (K.E.M.), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Pelvic ultrasound examination is the primary imaging modality for evaluating a wide range of female pelvic symptomatology, and is often the first imaging test to detect a gynecologic malignancy. Ultrasound imaging is particularly useful for evaluating the thickness and appearance of the endometrium in patients with abnormal bleeding, and in detecting and characterizing ovarian lesions. This article reviews the ultrasound appearance of gynecologic neoplasms grouped by anatomic site of origin, the ultrasound appearance of select benign pelvic pathology not to be misinterpreted as malignancy, as well as available ultrasound imaging-based guidelines for managing potential gynecologic neoplasms.
Collapse
|
29
|
Marzola MC, Chondrogiannis S, Rubello D. Fludeoxyglucose F 18 PET/CT Assessment of Ovarian Cancer. PET Clin 2018; 13:179-202. [PMID: 29482749 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2017.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers and one of the leading causes of cancer death in women. It is often asymptomatic in early stages, and thus most patients are diagnosed when it is of advanced stage. For these reasons, the role of biomarkers and tomographic imaging is crucial. Fludeoxyglucose F 18 PET/CT is a useful imaging modality in different clinical settings of the disease, overcoming some limits of conventional imaging and influencing prognosis and therapeutic approaches. PET/MR imaging is an emerging modality, and its potential role remains to be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Marzola
- Department of Nuclear Medicine PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Viale 3 Martiri, 140, Rovigo 45100, Italy.
| | - Sotirios Chondrogiannis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Viale 3 Martiri, 140, Rovigo 45100, Italy
| | - Domenico Rubello
- Department of Nuclear Medicine PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Viale 3 Martiri, 140, Rovigo 45100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Adnexal masses (ie, masses of the ovary, fallopian tube, or surrounding tissues) commonly are encountered by obstetrician-gynecologists and often present diagnostic and management dilemmas. Most adnexal masses are detected incidentally on physical examination or at the time of pelvic imaging. Less commonly, a mass may present with symptoms of acute or intermittent pain. Management decisions often are influenced by the age and family history of the patient. Although most adnexal masses are benign, the main goal of the diagnostic evaluation is to exclude malignancy. The purpose of this document is to provide guidelines for the evaluation and management of adnexal masses in adolescents, pregnant women, and nonpregnant women and to outline criteria for the identification of adnexal masses that are likely to be malignant and may warrant referral to or consultation with a gynecologic oncologist.
Collapse
|
31
|
Loh AHP, Lee YT, Lam SL, Ong CL. Re: External validation of the Paediatric Risk of Malignancy Index. BJOG 2016; 123:1399. [PMID: 27272297 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amos Hong Pheng Loh
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - York Tien Lee
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shu Lin Lam
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chiou Li Ong
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Retrospective analysis of suspicious pelvic masses using the Pelvic Mass Index (PMI) scoring system from 2007 to 2014. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 201:79-84. [PMID: 27082132 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2015] [Revised: 02/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to validate the accuracy of the Pelvic Mass Index (PMI) by comparing it with Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in a large patient cohort. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective study used data of women with ovarian masses collected from 2007 to 2014, referred to the Pelvic Mass Clinic (PMC) at University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff. The locally developed PMI was used to triage patients for surgery, surveillance or discharge. Performance measures for PMI, RMI and CA125 are reported as sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) for premenopausal and postmenopausal women alike. RESULTS PMI was calculated on 1468 patients of whom 497 underwent surgery, 176 (71.0%) were in the high risk group, 63 (68.0%) intermediate and 258 (23%) amongst low risk women. Compared to RMI, PMI had a higher sensitivity (90.4%) and NPV (96.9%) for the entire cohort, as well as in the premenopausal (88.9%; 97.6%) and postmenopausal (91.5%; 95.6%) subcategories. ROC curves indicated better performance in the total group (AUC 0.823 vs. 0.770) and the premenopausal group (AUC 0.847 vs. 0.728), though AUC in the postmenopausal group was similar (0.779 vs. 0.791) - likely due to increased specificity of CA125 after menopause. Histology revealed PMI significantly outperforms RMI in diagnosing malignancy, missing only 1 compared to 20 cancers. CONCLUSIONS The high sensitivity and NPV of PMI makes it a useful tool in triaging patients with suspicious ovarian masses.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is now recognized that ovarian cancer includes a heterogeneous group of malignant epithelial tumors originating from the ovaries, fallopian tubes, or peritoneum. This development has prompted the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) to issue a revised staging system that can provide prognostic information and guidance on personalized management of ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION We review the epidemiology of ovarian cancer, the new FIGO staging system, and the role of imaging in the assessment, staging, and follow-up of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
34
|
Benacerraf BR. Ultrasonic diagnosis of ovarian masses: can the playing field be leveled and raised at the same time? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214:419-421. [PMID: 27017322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Revised: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Beryl R Benacerraf
- Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Abstract
Practitioners may frequently encounter adnexal masses in premenopausal women. Adnexal masses can represent a wide variety of etiologies, and therefore they can represent a diagnostic dilemma. When an adnexal mass is found the initial work up must focus on identifying acute pathology followed by determining the risk of a malignancy. Pelvic ultrasound remains the mainstay for evaluation of adnexal masses in premenopausal patients. If ultrasounds findings are indeterminate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the next imaging modality of choice. The evaluation for malignancy should include serum marker screening. Aspiration of adnexal masses is generally avoided, due to the lack of therapeutic benefit and risk of seeding a tumor. When ultrasound findings are suggestive of benign disease, conservative management, including repeat imaging, should be considered. If the clinical suspicion for malignancy is high referral to a gynecologic oncologist is warranted. In other patients whom the evaluation of their adnexal mass remains unclear surgical excision with care not to disrupt the integrity of the mass should be performed for pathologic diagnosis.
Collapse
|
37
|
Spencer JA. Indeterminate lesions in cancer (I): pelvic adnexal masses. Cancer Imaging 2015. [PMCID: PMC4554685 DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2002.0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
38
|
Rogers EM, Casadiego Cubides G, Lacy J, Gerstle JT, Kives S, Allen L. Preoperative risk stratification of adnexal masses: can we predict the optimal surgical management? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014; 27:125-8. [PMID: 24560684 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2013] [Revised: 09/05/2013] [Accepted: 09/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To characterize preoperative risk stratification with aim of identifying the accurate surgical approach of benign and malignant adnexal masses in pediatric patients. DESIGN A retrospective chart review of all cases of adnexal masses surgically managed between January 2001 and December 2006. SETTING The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. PARTICIPANTS 129 cases of 126 pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent operative management of their adnexal masses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Ultrasonographic characteristics (cyst size and character), surgical approach (laparoscopy vs laparotomy) and method of cyst removal (cystectomy vs oophorectomy). Data was assessed with a Fisher Exact test where appropriate (P < .05). RESULTS Malignancies were more frequently treated by laparotomy (n = 14, 98.6%, P < .001), and benign cases by laparoscopy (n = 78, 97%, P < .001). On ultrasonography, malignant masses were more often complex (n = 16, 100%, P = .006) and ≥8 cm (n = 16, 100%, P < .001) than benign masses (≥8 cm n = 60, 53%, complex n = 76, 67%). Combining ultrasonographic measurements of ≥8 cm and complexity identified 100% of malignant masses (n = 16) and 36% of benign masses (n = 41, P < .001, PPV = 37.1, NPV = 100%). Additional imaging including CT/MRI was ordered by pediatric surgeons (n = 17, 77%) more often than pediatric gynecologists (n = 44, 41%, P = .002). Furthermore, pediatric surgeons managed adnexal masses by oophorectomy (n = 12, 55%) more often as compared to pediatric gynecologists (n = 19, 18%, P < .001). CONCLUSION Using preoperative characteristics of complexity and ≥8 cm reduces the number of benign masses treated with laparotomy while ensuring malignant masses are managed with an open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M Rogers
- Division of Pediatric Gynecology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Giovanny Casadiego Cubides
- Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Judith Lacy
- Division of Pediatric Gynecology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J Ted Gerstle
- Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sari Kives
- Division of Pediatric Gynecology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Allen
- Division of Pediatric Gynecology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Gerada M, Virgilio B, Pilloni M, Galvan R, Laparte MC, Alcázar JL, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic diseases. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014. [DOI: 10.1586/17474108.3.6.731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
40
|
Telli E, Yalcin OT, Ozalp SS, Hassa H. Surgical intervention for adnexal masses during pregnancy. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013:bcr-2013-010324. [PMID: 23814228 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2013-010324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the influence of surgical intervention on gestational and neonatal outcomes in women who underwent elective surgery in the second trimester of gestation because of an adnexal mass. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of women who underwent elective surgery for adnexal masses in the second trimester of gestation between 2006 and 2012. The ages of the women ranged between 17 and 33 years. Eight women underwent a laparotomy, and one woman, who aborted on the day of the operation, underwent a laparoscopy. Dermoid cysts, cystadenoma and borderline ovarian tumours were present in four, two and two of the women, respectively. Eight women had no complications after surgery and delivered healthy newborns at term. We concluded that elective surgery on an adnexal mass in the second trimester of gestation is safe for both the mother and the fetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Telli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osmangazi University, School of Medicine, Eskisehir, Turkey.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Thomassin-Naggara I, Aubert E, Rockall A, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Rouzier R, Daraï E, Bazot M. Adnexal Masses: Development and Preliminary Validation of an MR Imaging Scoring System. Radiology 2013; 267:432-43. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
42
|
NAGRA I, TEO HG. Imaging in ovarian cancer. IMAGING 2013. [DOI: 10.1259/imaging.20100060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
43
|
Mohaghegh P, Rockall AG. Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques. Radiographics 2013; 32:1751-73. [PMID: 23065168 DOI: 10.1148/rg.326125520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Early detection of ovarian cancer remains crucial for improving patient survival rates. However, early-stage disease is often asymptomatic, and population screening is currently unproven. Adnexal masses may be incidentally detected, but most are identified at ultrasonography (US) in patients who are symptomatic, and most may be characterized as benign or malignant. Indices are available to estimate the risk of malignancy on the basis of clinical and US findings. However, adnexal masses remain indeterminate in some cases, with some benign lesions demonstrating features of malignancy at US. In these cases, use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging improves the ability to characterize adnexal masses and reduces the number of indeterminate lesions. Establishing the likelihood of malignancy on the basis of imaging features is important to the preoperative detection of early ovarian cancer and profoundly influences referral and management pathways. Conventional and contrast material-enhanced MR imaging are used to evaluate morphologic features, including lesion complexity, signal intensity, and enhancement of solid areas. At dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with semiquantitative analysis, early enhancement characteristics may help differentiate some complex benign and malignant lesions. Diffusion-weighted imaging has a limited but useful role in evaluating adnexal masses: Those with a hypointense solid area on both diffusion-weighted (b = 1000 sec/mm²) and T2-weighted images are likely benign, whereas those that are hyperintense on diffusion-weighted images (b = 1000 sec/mm²) with intermediate signal intensity on T2-weighted images are likely malignant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pegah Mohaghegh
- Imaging Department, Bart's Cancer Centre, King George V Wing, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Room 6, Ground Floor, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, England
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wasnik AP, Menias CO, Platt JF, Lalchandani UR, Bedi DG, Elsayes KM. Multimodality imaging of ovarian cystic lesions: Review with an imaging based algorithmic approach. World J Radiol 2013; 5:113-25. [PMID: 23671748 PMCID: PMC3650202 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2012] [Revised: 08/16/2012] [Accepted: 01/31/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cystic masses include a spectrum of benign, borderline and high grade malignant neoplasms. Imaging plays a crucial role in characterization and pretreatment planning of incidentally detected or suspected adnexal masses, as diagnosis of ovarian malignancy at an early stage is correlated with a better prognosis. Knowledge of differential diagnosis, imaging features, management trends and an algorithmic approach of such lesions is important for optimal clinical management. This article illustrates a multi-modality approach in the diagnosis of a spectrum of ovarian cystic masses and also proposes an algorithmic approach for the diagnosis of these lesions.
Collapse
|
45
|
|
46
|
Li PL, Zhang Y. Cross talk between ceramide and redox signaling: implications for endothelial dysfunction and renal disease. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2013:171-97. [PMID: 23563657 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1511-4_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated that cross talk between ceramide and redox signaling modulates various cell activities and functions and contributes to the development of cardiovascular diseases and renal dysfunctions. Ceramide triggers the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increases oxidative stress in many mammalian cells and animal models. On the other hand, inhibition of ROS-generating enzymes or treatment of antioxidants impairs sphingomyelinase activation and ceramide production. As a mechanism, ceramide-enriched signaling platforms, special cell membrane rafts (MR) (formerly lipid rafts), provide an important microenvironment to mediate the cross talk of ceramide and redox signaling to exert a corresponding regulatory role on cell and organ functions. In this regard, activation of acid sphingomyelinase and generation of ceramide mediate the formation of ceramide-enriched membrane platforms, where transmembrane signals are transmitted or amplified through recruitment, clustering, assembling, or integration of various signaling molecules. A typical such signaling platform is MR redox signaling platform that is centered on ceramide production and aggregation leading to recruitment and assembling of NADPH oxidase to form an active complex in the cell plasma membrane. This redox signaling platform not only conducts redox signaling or regulation but also facilitates a feedforward amplification of both ceramide and redox signaling. In addition to this membrane MR redox signaling platform, the cross talk between ceramide and redox signaling may occur in other cell compartments. This book chapter focuses on the molecular mechanisms, spatial-temporal regulations, and implications of this cross talk between ceramide and redox signaling, which may provide novel insights into the understanding of both ceramide and redox signaling pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pin-Lan Li
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Laing FC, Allison SJ. US of the Ovary and Adnexa: To Worry or Not to Worry? Radiographics 2012; 32:1621-39; discussion 1640-2. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.326125512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
48
|
He G, Holcroft CA, Beauchamp MC, Yasmeen A, Ferenczy A, Kendall-Dupont J, Mes-Masson AM, Provencher D, Gotlieb WH. Combination of Serum Biomarkers to Differentiate Malignant From Benign Ovarian Tumours. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2012; 34:567-574. [DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)35273-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
49
|
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic malignancy. It is the deadliest, largely owing to late stage at the time of diagnosis. Ultrasound is modality of choice in the evaluation of suspected adnexal masses. Magnetic resonance imaging is an excellent problem solver when an adnexal mass is indeterminate on ultrasound. Staging of ovarian cancer remains surgical, though preoperative imaging can identify inoperable patients and identify suspicious sites for intraoperative biopsy. This article reviews the use of different imaging modalities in the detection and staging of ovarian carcinoma, and discusses imaging indications, radiologic features, and the shortcomings of imaging.
Collapse
|
50
|
Leak-proof extracorporeal drainage for management of large ovarian tumors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 285:1079-82. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-011-2115-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2011] [Accepted: 10/10/2011] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|