Deep Learning-based Reconstruction for Lower-Dose Pediatric CT: Technical Principles, Image Characteristics, and Clinical Implementations

Super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction with 1024 matrix improves CT image quality for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma assessment

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficiency of super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) optimized for helical body imaging in assessing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using normal-resolution (NR) CT scanner.

METHODS

Fifty patients with PDAC who underwent multiphase pancreas CT on a 320-row NR scanner were retrospectively analyzed. Images were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), normal-resolution deep-learning reconstruction (NR-DLR), and SR-DLR at a 0.5-mm slice thickness. The matrix size was 512 × 512 for HIR and NR-DLR, and 1024 × 1024 for SR-DLR. Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of pancreas, superior mesenteric artery, portal vein, and PDAC were quantified. Noise power spectrum (NPS) in the liver and edge rise slope (ERS) at the pancreas, artery, and vein were used to quantify noise properties and edge sharpness. Subjective evaluations included rankings of image sharpness, noise magnitude, texture fineness, and delineation of PDAC, pancreas margin, pancreatic duct, peripancreatic vessels, and hepatic lesions (1 = worst; 3 = best among three image series). Overall diagnostic quality was rated on a 5-point scale (1 = undiagnostic, 5 = excellent).

RESULTS

SR-DLR showed significantly lower image noise and higher CNR than HIR and NR-DLR (all, p < 0.001). NPS analysis revealed no significant difference in average spatial frequency between SR-DLR and NR-DLR (p = 0.770), both being higher than HIR (both, p < 0.001). ERS values of all structures were highest with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). SR-DLR received the highest subjective scores for all criteria, with significant differences from HIR and NR-DLR (all, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SR-DLR improved both subjective and objective image quality, enhancing the delineation of all structures relevant to PDAC assessment using NR CT scanner.

Deep Learning-Enhanced Ultra-high-resolution CT Imaging for Superior Temporal Bone Visualization

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study assesses the image quality of temporal bone ultra-high-resolution (UHR) Computed tomography (CT) scans in adults and children using hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and a novel, vendor-specific deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) algorithm called AiCE Inner Ear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective, single-center study (February 1-July 30, 2023), UHR-CT scans of 57 temporal bones of 35 patients (5 children, 23 male) with at least one anatomical unremarkable temporal bone were included. There is an adult computed tomography dose index volume (CTDIvol 25.6 mGy) and a pediatric protocol (15.3 mGy). Images were reconstructed using HIR at normal resolution (0.5-mm slice thickness, 512² matrix) and UHR (0.25-mm, 1024² and 2048² matrix) as well as with a vendor-specific DLR advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine inner ear (AiCE Inner Ear) at UHR (0.25-mm, 1024² matrix). Three radiologists evaluated 18 anatomic structures using a 5-point Likert scale. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured automatically.

RESULTS

In the adult protocol subgroup (n=30; median age: 51 [11-89]; 19 men) and the pediatric protocol subgroup (n=5; median age: 2 [1-3]; 4 men), UHR-CT with DLR significantly improved subjective image quality (p<0.024), reduced noise (p<0.001), and increased CNR and SNR (p<0.001). DLR also enhanced visualization of key structures, including the tendon of the stapedius muscle (p<0.001), tympanic membrane (p<0.009), and basal aspect of the osseous spiral lamina (p<0.018).

CONCLUSION

Vendor-specific DLR-enhanced UHR-CT significantly improves temporal bone image quality and diagnostic performance.

Towards ultra-low-dose CT for detecting pulmonary nodules using DenseNet

Low-radiation techniques should be used to detect and follow lung nodules on CT images, but reducing radiation dose to ultra-low-dose CT with submilliSievert dose level would drastically impede image quality and sensitivity for nodule detection. This study investigated the feasibility of using DenseNet to suppress image noise in ultra-low-dose CT for lung cancer screening. DenseNet was trained using input-label pairs from 1, 2, 4, and 6 patients. After training, the model was tested with chest CT from 14 patients that were not used in training process. Seven patients have solid nodules and 7 patients have subsolid nodules. Root mean square error (RMSE) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were calculated to quantify the difference between reference and test images. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between lung nodule and lung parenchyma was calculated to evaluate the target detectability of chest CT. Subjective image quality assessment was performed using 4-point ranking scale to evaluate the visual quality of CT images perceived by end user. Substantial improvements in RMSE and PSNR were observed after denoising. The lung nodules in denoised images could be distinguished more easily in comparison with those in the original ultra-low-dose CT, which is supported by the CNRs and subjective image quality scores. The comparison of intensity profiles for lung nodules demonstrated that the image noise in ultra-low-dose CT could be suppressed effectively after denoising without causing edge blurring or variation in Hounsfield unit (HU) values. A two-sample t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between full-dose CT and denoised ultra-low-dose CT in the evaluation of lung nodules, lung parenchyma, paraspinal muscle, or vertebral body. Since the linear no-threshold model suggests that no amount of ionizing radiation is entirely risk-free, the quest for further dose reduction remains a consistently important focus in radiology. Overall, our findings suggest that DenseNet could be a viable approach for reducing image noise in ultra-low-dose CT scans used for lung cancer screening.

Low tube voltage and deep-learning reconstruction for reducing radiation and contrast medium doses in thin-slice abdominal CT: a prospective clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility of low-radiation dose and low iodinated contrast medium (ICM) dose protocol combining low-tube voltage and deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm in thin-slice abdominal CT.

METHODS

This prospective study included 148 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT with either 120-kVp (600 mgL/kg, n = 74) or 80-kVp protocol (360 mgL/kg, n = 74). The 120-kVp images were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) (120-kVp-HIR), while 80-kVp images were reconstructed using HIR (80-kVp-HIR) and DLR (80-kVp-DLR) with 0.5 mm thickness. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) and iodine dose were compared between protocols. Image noise, CT attenuation, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified. Noise power spectrum (NPS) and edge rise slope (ERS) were used to evaluate noise texture and edge sharpness, respectively. The subjective image quality was rated on a 4-point scale.

RESULTS

SSDE and iodine doses of 80-kVp were 40.4% (8.1 ± 0.9 vs. 13.6 ± 2.7 mGy) and 36.3% (21.2 ± 3.9 vs. 33.3 ± 4.3 gL) lower, respectively, than those of 120-kVp (both, p < 0.001). CT attenuation of vessels and solid organs was higher in 80-kVp than in 120-kVp images (all, p < 0.001). Image noise of 80-kVp-HIR and 80-kVp-DLR was higher and lower, respectively than that of 120-kVp-HIR (both p < 0.001). The highest CNR and subjective scores were attained in 80-kVp-DLR (all, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in average NPS frequency and ERS between 120-kVp-HIR and 80-kVp-DLR (p ≥ 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the 120-kVp-HIR protocol, the combined use of 80-kVp and DLR techniques yielded superior subjective and objective image quality with reduced radiation and ICM doses at thin-section abdominal CT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Scanning at low-tube voltage (80-kVp) combined with the deep-learning reconstruction algorithm may enhance diagnostic efficiency and patient safety by improving image quality and reducing radiation and contrast doses of thin-slice abdominal CT.

KEY POINTS

Reducing radiation and iodine doses is desirable; however, contrast and noise degradation can be detrimental. The 80-kVp scan with the deep-learning reconstruction technique provided better images with lower radiation and contrast doses. This technique may be efficient for improving diagnostic confidence and patient safety in thin-slice abdominal CT.

Super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction for cardiac CT: impact of radiation dose and focal spot size on task-based image quality

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of radiation dose and focal spot size on the image quality of super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) in comparison with iterative reconstruction (IR) and normal-resolution DLR (NR-DLR) algorithms for cardiac CT. Catphan-700 phantom was scanned on a 320-row scanner at six radiation doses (small and large focal spots at 1.4-4.3 and 5.8-8.8 mGy, respectively). Images were reconstructed using hybrid-IR, model-based-IR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR algorithms. Noise properties were evaluated through plotting noise power spectrum (NPS). Spatial resolution was quantified with task-based transfer function (TTF); Polystyrene, Delrin, and Bone-50% inserts were used for low-, intermediate, and high-contrast spatial resolution. The detectability index (d') was calculated. Image noise, noise texture, edge sharpness of low- and intermediate-contrast objects, delineation of fine high-contrast objects, and overall quality of four reconstructions were visually ranked. Results indicated that among four reconstructions, SR-DLR yielded the lowest noise magnitude and NPS peak, as well as the highest average NPS frequency, TTF50%, d' values, and visual rank at each radiation dose. For all reconstructions, the intermediate- to high-contrast spatial resolution was maximized at 4.3 mGy, while the lowest noise magnitude and highest d' were attained at 8.8 mGy. SR-DLR at 4.3 mGy exhibited superior noise performance, intermediate- to high-contrast spatial resolution, d' values, and visual rank compared to the other reconstructions at 8.8 mGy. Therefore, SR-DLR may yield superior diagnostic image quality and facilitate radiation dose reduction compared to the other reconstructions, particularly when combined with small focal spot scanning.

Techniques and Strategies to Minimize Radiation Exposure in Pediatric Computed Tomography (CT) Abdominal Examinations: A Review

As children are more vulnerable to radiation-induced cancers and have longer life expectancies, it is essential to implement strict radiation protection measures in pediatric imaging. This study aimed to review radiation dose-minimizing measures in pediatric abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations. A systematic search across various databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, yielded a total of 7,314 articles. The search used keywords that aligned with the objectives of the study. This study included 77 publications after applying the criteria for inclusion and exclusion. We carefully reviewed these selected articles for compliance with the inclusion criteria and excluded them if they did not meet the specified criteria. Only 12 articles fulfilled the strict criteria. An in-depth review of 12 selected articles demonstrated the radiation dose reduction techniques and strategies, which include prefiltering and post-processing algorithms, careful adjustment of exposure parameters such as tube voltage (kVp) and current (mAs), and the establishment of diagnostic reference levels (DRL). Reduction of radiation exposure in pediatric CT imaging demands multifaceted approaches. To reduce the ionizing radiation dose while still obtaining high-quality diagnostic images, healthcare practitioners should adhere to DRL, adjust exposure factors, implement prefiltration, employ AI, and use post-processing algorithms.

Improved stent sharpness evaluation with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction in coronary CT angiography

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the impact of super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) image quality and blooming artifacts from coronary artery stents in comparison to conventional methods, including hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis included 66 CCTA patients from July to November 2022. Major coronary arteries were evaluated for image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Stent sharpness was quantified using 10%-90% edge rise slope (ERS) and 10%-90% edge rise distance (ERD). Qualitative analysis employed a 5-point scoring system to assess overall image quality, image noise, vessel wall, and stent structure.

RESULTS

SR-DLR demonstrated significantly lower image noise compared to HIR and DLR. SNR and CNR were notably higher in SR-DLR. Stent ERS was significantly improved in SR-DLR, with mean ERD values of 0.70 ± 0.20 mm for SR-DLR, 1.13 ± 0.28 mm for HIR, and 0.85 ± 0.26 mm for DLR. Qualitatively, SR-DLR scored higher in all categories.

CONCLUSIONS

SR-DLR produces images with lower image noise, leading to improved overall image quality, compared with HIR and DLR. SR-DLR is a valuable image reconstruction algorithm for enhancing the spatial resolution and sharpness of coronary artery stents without being constrained by hardware limitations.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The overall image quality was significantly higher in SR-DLR, resulting in sharper coronary artery stents compared to HIR and DLR.

CT Assessment of Aortopulmonary Septal Defect: How to Approach It?

An aortopulmonary septal defect or aortopulmonary window (APW) is a rare cardiovascular anomaly with direct communication between the ascending aorta and the main pulmonary artery leading to a left-to-right shunt. It is accompanied by other cardiovascular anomalies in approximately half of patients. In order to avoid irreversible sequelae, interventional or surgical treatment should be performed as soon as possible. Cardiovascular CT, as a fast, non-invasive technique with excellent spatial resolution, has an increasing role in the evaluation of patients with APW, enabling precise and detailed planning of surgical treatment of APW and associated anomalies if present. This article aims to review the anatomical and clinical features of aortopulmonary septal defect with special emphasis on its detection and characterization by a CT examination.

Insights about cervical lymph nodes: Evaluating deep learning-based reconstruction for head and neck computed tomography scan

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate differences in cervical lymph node image quality on dual-energy computed tomography (CT) scan with datasets reconstructed using filter back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), and deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in patients with head and neck cancer.

Method

Seventy patients with head and neck cancer underwent follow-up contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT examinations. All datasets were reconstructed using FBP, hybrid IR with 30 % adaptive statistical IR (ASiR-V), and DLIR with three selectable levels (low, medium, and high) at 2.5- and 0.625-mm slice thicknesses. Herein, signal, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio of lymph nodes and overall image quality, artifact, and noise of selected regions of interest were evaluated by two radiologists. Next, cervical lymph node sharpness was evaluated using full width at half maximum.

Results

DLIR exhibited significantly reduced noise, ranging from 3.8 % to 35.9 % with improved signal-to-noise ratio (11.5-105.6 %) and contrast-to-noise ratio (10.5-107.5 %) compared with FBP and ASiR-V, for cervical lymph nodes (p < 0.001). Further, 0.625-mm-thick images reconstructed using DLIR-medium and DLIR-high had a lower noise than 2.5-mm-thick images reconstructed using FBP and ASiR-V. The lymph node margins and vessels on DLIR-medium and DLIR-high were sharper than those on FBP and ASiR-V (p < 0.05). Both readers agreed that DLIR had a better image quality than the conventional reconstruction algorithms.

Conclusion

DLIR-medium and -high provided superior cervical lymph node image quality in head and neck CT. Improved image quality affords thin-slice DLIR images for dose-reduction protocols in the future.

Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm

Objective. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms exhibit object-dependent resolution and noise performance. Thus, traditional geometric CT phantoms cannot fully capture the clinical imaging performance of DLR. This study uses a patient-derived 3D-printed PixelPrint lung phantom to evaluate a commercial DLR algorithm across a wide range of radiation dose levels.Method. The lung phantom used in this study is based on a patient chest CT scan containing ground glass opacities and was fabricated using PixelPrint 3D-printing technology. The phantom was placed inside two different size extension rings to mimic a small- and medium-sized patient and was scanned on a conventional CT scanner at exposures between 0.5 and 20 mGy. Each scan was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction, and DLR at five levels of denoising. Image noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), root mean squared error, structural similarity index (SSIM), and multi-scale SSIM (MS SSIM) were calculated for each image.Results.DLR demonstrated superior performance compared to FBP and iterative reconstruction for all measured metrics in both phantom sizes, with better performance for more aggressive denoising levels. DLR was estimated to reduce dose by 25%-83% in the small phantom and by 50%-83% in the medium phantom without decreasing image quality for any of the metrics measured in this study. These dose reduction estimates are more conservative compared to the estimates obtained when only considering noise and CNR.Conclusion. DLR has the capability of producing diagnostic image quality at up to 83% lower radiation dose, which can improve the clinical utility and viability of lower dose CT scans. Furthermore, the PixelPrint phantom used in this study offers an improved testing environment with more realistic tissue structures compared to traditional CT phantoms, allowing for structure-based image quality evaluation beyond noise and contrast-based assessments.

Novel Deep Learning Denoising Enhances Image Quality and Lowers Radiation Exposure in Interventional Bronchial Artery Embolization Cone Beam CT

OBJECTIVES

In interventional bronchial artery embolization (BAE), periprocedural cone beam CT (CBCT) improves guiding and localization. However, a trade-off exists between 6-second runs (high radiation dose and motion artifacts, but low noise) and 3-second runs (vice versa). This study aimed to determine the efficacy of an advanced deep learning denoising (DLD) technique in mitigating the trade-offs related to radiation dose and image quality during interventional BAE CBCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included BMI-matched patients undergoing 6-second and 3-second BAE CBCT scans. The dose-area product values (DAP) were obtained. All datasets were reconstructed using standard weighted filtered back projection (OR) and a novel DLD software. Objective image metrics were derived from place-consistent regions of interest, including CT numbers of the Aorta and lung, noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio. Three blinded radiologists performed subjective assessments regarding image quality, sharpness, contrast, and motion artifacts on all dataset combinations in a forced-choice setup (-1 = inferior, 0 = equal; 1 = superior). The points were averaged per item for a total score. Statistical analysis ensued using a properly corrected mixed-effects model with post hoc pairwise comparisons.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were assessed in 30 matched pairs (age 64 ± 15 years; 10 female). The mean DAP for the 6 s and 3 s runs was 2199 ± 185 µGym² and 1227 ± 90 µGym², respectively. Neither low-dose imaging nor the reconstruction method introduced a significant HU shift (p ≥ 0.127). The 3 s-DLD presented the least noise and superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) (p < 0.001). While subjective evaluation revealed no noticeable distinction between 6 s-DLD and 3 s-DLD in terms of quality (p ≥ 0.996), both outperformed the OR variants (p < 0.001). The 3 s datasets exhibited fewer motion artifacts than the 6 s datasets (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DLD effectively mitigates the trade-off between radiation dose, image noise, and motion artifact burden in regular reconstructed BAE CBCT by enabling diagnostic scans with low radiation exposure and inherently low motion artifact burden at short examination times.

Prospective evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction for Lung-RADS and automatic nodule volumetry on ultralow-dose chest CT

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate whether Lung-RADS classification and volumetric nodule assessment were feasible with ultralow-dose (ULD) chest CT scans with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR).

METHODS

The institutional review board approved this prospective study. This study included 40 patients (mean age, 66±12 years; 21 women). Participants sequentially underwent LDCT and ULDCT (CTDIvol, 0.96±0.15 mGy and 0.12±0.01 mGy) scans reconstructed with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V 50% (ASIR-V50) and DLIR. CT image quality was compared subjectively and objectively. The pulmonary nodules were assessed visually by two readers using the Lung-RADS 1.1 and automatically using a computerized assisted tool.

RESULTS

DLIR provided a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio for LDCT and ULDCT images than ASIR-V50 (all P < .001). In general, DLIR showed superior subjective image quality for ULDCT images (P < .001) and comparable quality for LDCT images compared to ASIR-V50 (P = .01-1). The per-nodule sensitivities of observers for Lung-RADS category 3-4 nodules were 70.6-88.2% and 64.7-82.4% for DLIR-LDCT and DLIR-ULDCT images (P = 1) and categories were mostly concordant within observers. The per-nodule sensitivities of the computer-assisted detection for nodules ≥4 mm were 72.1% and 67.4% on DLIR-LDCT and ULDCT images (P = .50). The 95% limits of agreement for nodule volume differences between DLIR-LDCT and ULDCT images (-85.6 to 78.7 mm3) was similar to the within-scan nodule volume differences between DLIR- and ASIR-V50-LDCT images (-63.9 to 78.5 mm3), with volume differences smaller than 25% in 88.5% and 92.3% of nodules, respectively (P = .65).

CONCLUSION

DLIR enabled comparable Lung-RADS and volumetric nodule assessments on ULDCT images to LDCT images.

Innovative advances in pediatric radiology: computed tomography reconstruction techniques, photon-counting detector computed tomography, and beyond

In pediatric radiology, balancing diagnostic accuracy with reduced radiation exposure is paramount due to the heightened vulnerability of younger patients to radiation. Technological advancements in computed tomography (CT) reconstruction techniques, especially model-based iterative reconstruction and deep learning image reconstruction, have enabled significant reductions in radiation doses without compromising image quality. Deep learning image reconstruction, powered by deep learning algorithms, has demonstrated superiority over traditional techniques like filtered back projection, providing enhanced image quality, especially in pediatric head and cardiac CT scans. Photon-counting detector CT has emerged as another groundbreaking technology, allowing for high-resolution images while substantially reducing radiation doses, proving highly beneficial for pediatric patients requiring frequent imaging. Furthermore, cloud-based dose tracking software focuses on monitoring radiation exposure, ensuring adherence to safety standards. However, the deployment of these technologies presents challenges, including the need for large datasets, computational demands, and potential data privacy issues. This article provides a comprehensive exploration of these technological advancements, their clinical implications, and the ongoing efforts to enhance pediatric radiology's safety and effectiveness.

[Physical Properties of Small Focal Spot Imaging with Deep Learning Reconstruction in Chest-abdominal Plain CT]

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the physical properties of small focal spot imaging with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and small or large focal spot imaging with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) in chest-abdominal plain computed tomography.

METHOD

In small focal spot imaging using DLR and hybrid IR, tube currents were set at 350 mA. For the large focal spot imaging using hybrid IR, the tube current was set at 360, 400, 450, and 500 mA. The spatial frequencies with 50% task transfer function (TTF) for delrin and acrylic were calculated to compare spatial resolution properties for lung and soft tissue in the chest. Additionally, the low-contrast object-specific contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRLO) was measured as noise property was measured for a 7-mm module with a CT value contrast of 10 HU in the abdomen.

RESULT

Spatial frequencies with 50% TTF for delrin and acrylic were found to be greater in small focal spot imaging using DLR compared to those in small and large focal spot imaging using hybrid IR. Moreover, the CNRLO obtained from small focal spot imaging with DLR was also nearly equivalent to that of large focal spot imaging with hybrid IR at tube currents of 450 and 500 mA.

CONCLUSION

In chest-abdominal plain computed tomography, small focal spot imaging with DLR has been demonstrated to exhibit greater spatial resolution properties compared to small and large focal spot imaging with hybrid IR, with equivalent or better noise performance.

Patient-derived PixelPrint phantoms for evaluating clinical imaging performance of a deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm

Objective

Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms exhibit object-dependent resolution and noise performance. Thus, traditional geometric CT phantoms cannot fully capture the clinical imaging performance of DLR. This study uses a patient-derived 3D-printed PixelPrint lung phantom to evaluate a commercial DLR algorithm across a wide range of radiation dose levels.

Approach

The lung phantom used in this study is based on a patient chest CT scan containing ground glass opacities and was fabricated using PixelPrint 3D-printing technology. The phantom was placed inside two different sized extension rings to mimic a small and medium sized patient and was scanned on a conventional CT scanner at exposures between 0.5 and 20 mGy. Each scan was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction, and DLR at five levels of denoising. Image noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), root mean squared error (RMSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), and multi-scale SSIM (MS SSIM) were calculated for each image.

Main Results

DLR demonstrated superior performance compared to FBP and iterative reconstruction for all measured metrics in both phantom sizes, with better performance for more aggressive denoising levels. DLR was estimated to reduce dose by 25-83% in the small phantom and by 50-83% in the medium phantom without decreasing image quality for any of the metrics measured in this study. These dose reduction estimates are more conservative compared to the estimates obtained when only considering noise and CNR with a non-anatomical physics phantom.

Significance

DLR has the capability of producing diagnostic image quality at up to 83% lower radiation dose which can improve the clinical utility and viability of lower dose CT scans. Furthermore, the PixelPrint phantom used in this study offers an improved testing environment with more realistic tissue structures compared to traditional CT phantoms, allowing for structure-based image quality evaluation beyond noise and contrast-based assessments.

Customized Additive Manufacturing in Bone Scaffolds-The Gateway to Precise Bone Defect Treatment

In the advancing landscape of technology and novel material development, additive manufacturing (AM) is steadily making strides within the biomedical sector. Moving away from traditional, one-size-fits-all implant solutions, the advent of AM technology allows for patient-specific scaffolds that could improve integration and enhance wound healing. These scaffolds, meticulously designed with a myriad of geometries, mechanical properties, and biological responses, are made possible through the vast selection of materials and fabrication methods at our disposal. Recognizing the importance of precision in the treatment of bone defects, which display variability from macroscopic to microscopic scales in each case, a tailored treatment strategy is required. A patient-specific AM bone scaffold perfectly addresses this necessity. This review elucidates the pivotal role that customized AM bone scaffolds play in bone defect treatment, while offering comprehensive guidelines for their customization. This includes aspects such as bone defect imaging, material selection, topography design, and fabrication methodology. Additionally, we propose a cooperative model involving the patient, clinician, and engineer, thereby underscoring the interdisciplinary approach necessary for the effective design and clinical application of these customized AM bone scaffolds. This collaboration promises to usher in a new era of bioactive medical materials, responsive to individualized needs and capable of pushing boundaries in personalized medicine beyond those set by traditional medical materials.

The impact of deep learning reconstruction in low dose computed tomography on the evaluation of interstitial lung disease

To evaluate the effect of the deep learning model reconstruction (DLM) method in terms of image quality and diagnostic agreement in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for interstitial lung disease (ILD), 193 patients who underwent LDCT for suspected ILD were retrospectively reviewed. Datasets were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction Veo (ASiR-V), and DLM. For image quality analysis, the signal, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), blind/referenceless image spatial quality evaluator (BRISQUE), and visual scoring were evaluated. Also, CT patterns of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) were classified according to the 2022 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) diagnostic criteria. The differences between CT images subjected to FBP, ASiR-V 30%, and DLM were evaluated. The image noise and BRISQUE scores of DLM images was lower and SNR was higher than that of the ASiR-V and FBP images (ASiR-V vs. DLM, p < 0.001 and FBP vs. DLR-M, p < 0.001, respectively). The agreement of the diagnostic categorization of IPF between the three reconstruction methods was almost perfect (κ  =  0.992, CI 0.990-0.994). Image quality was improved with DLM compared to ASiR-V and FBP.

Validation of deep learning-based CT image reconstruction for treatment planning

Deep learning-based CT image reconstruction (DLR) is a state-of-the-art method for obtaining CT images. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of DLR in radiotherapy. Data were acquired using a large-bore CT system and an electron density phantom for radiotherapy. We compared the CT values, image noise, and CT value-to-electron density conversion table of DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (H-IR) for various doses. Further, we evaluated three DLR reconstruction strength patterns (Mild, Standard, and Strong). The variations of CT values of DLR and H-IR were large at low doses, and the difference in average CT values was insignificant with less than 10 HU at doses of 100 mAs and above. DLR showed less change in CT values and smaller image noise relative to H-IR. The noise-reduction effect was particularly large in the low-dose region. The difference in image noise between DLR Mild and Standard/Strong was large, suggesting the usefulness of reconstruction intensities higher than Mild. DLR showed stable CT values and low image noise for various materials, even at low doses; particularly for Standard or Strong, the reduction in image noise was significant. These findings indicate the usefulness of DLR in treatment planning using large-bore CT systems.

Proposed competencies for the performance of cardiovascular computed tomography in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease

Cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) is rated appropriate by published guidelines for the initial evaluation and follow up of congenital heart disease (CHD) and is an essential modality in cardiac imaging programs for patients of all ages. However, no recommended core competencies exist to guide CCT in CHD imaging training pathways, curricula development, or establishment of a more formal educational platform. To fill this gap, a group of experienced congenital cardiac imagers, intentionally inclusive of adult and pediatric cardiologists and radiologists, was formed to propose core competencies fundamental to the expert-level performance of CCT in pediatric acquired and congenital heart disease and adult CHD. The 2020 SCCT Guideline for Training Cardiology and Radiology Trainees as Independent Practitioners (Level II) and Advanced Practitioners (Level III) in Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (1) for adult imaging were used as a framework to define pediatric and CHD-specific competencies. Established competencies will be immediately relevant for advanced cardiac imaging fellowships in both cardiology and radiology training pathways. Proposed future steps include radiology and cardiology society collaboration to establish provider certification levels, training case-volume recommendations, and continuing medical education (CME) requirements for expert-level performance of CCT in pediatric and adult CHD.

Impact of a reduced iodine load with deep learning reconstruction on abdominal MDCT

To evaluate the impact of a reduced iodine load using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on the hepatic parenchyma compared to conventional iterative reconstruction (hybrid IR) and its consequence on the radiation dose and image quality. This retrospective monocentric intraindividual comparison study included 66 patients explored at the portal phase using different multidetector computed tomography parameters: Group A, hybrid IR algorithm (hybrid IR) and a nonionic low-osmolality contrast agent (350 mgI/mL); Group B, DLR algorithm (DLR) and a nonionic iso-osmolality contrast agent (270 mgI/mL). We recorded the attenuation of the liver parenchyma, image quality, and radiation dose parameters. The mean hounsfield units (HU) value of the liver parenchyma was significantly lower in group B, at 105.9 ± 10.9 HU versus 118.5 ± 14.6 HU in group A. However, the 90%IC of mean liver attenuation in the group B (DLR) was between 100.8 HU and 109.3 HU. The signal-to-noise ratio of the liver parenchyma was significantly higher on DLR images, increasing by 56%. However, for both the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and CNR liver/PV no statistical difference was found, even if the CNR liver/PV ratio was slightly higher for group A. The mean dose-length product and computed tomography dose index volume values were significantly lower with DLR, corresponding to a radiation dose reduction of 36% for the DLR. Using a DLR algorithm for abdominal multidetector computed tomography with a low iodine load can provide sufficient enhancement of the liver parenchyma up to 100 HU in addition to the advantages of a higher image quality, a better signal-to-noise ratio and a lower radiation dose.

Computed Tomography 2.0: New Detector Technology, AI, and Other Developments

ABSTRACT

Computed tomography (CT) dramatically improved the capabilities of diagnostic and interventional radiology. Starting in the early 1970s, this imaging modality is still evolving, although tremendous improvements in scan speed, volume coverage, spatial and soft tissue resolution, as well as dose reduction have been achieved. Tube current modulation, automated exposure control, anatomy-based tube voltage (kV) selection, advanced x-ray beam filtration, and iterative image reconstruction techniques improved image quality and decreased radiation exposure. Cardiac imaging triggered the demand for high temporal resolution, volume acquisition, and high pitch modes with electrocardiogram synchronization. Plaque imaging in cardiac CT as well as lung and bone imaging demand for high spatial resolution. Today, we see a transition of photon-counting detectors from experimental and research prototype setups into commercially available systems integrated in patient care. Moreover, with respect to CT technology and CT image formation, artificial intelligence is increasingly used in patient positioning, protocol adjustment, and image reconstruction, but also in image preprocessing or postprocessing. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the technical specifications of up-to-date available whole-body and dedicated CT systems, as well as hardware and software innovations for CT systems in the near future.

Assessment of Image Quality of Coronary CT Angiography Using Deep Learning-Based CT Reconstruction: Phantom and Patient Studies

BACKGROUND

In coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), the main issue of image quality is noise in obese patients, blooming artifacts due to calcium and stents, high-risk coronary plaques, and radiation exposure to patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the CCTA image quality of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) with that of filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR).

METHODS

This was a phantom study of 90 patients who underwent CCTA. CCTA images were acquired using FBP, IR, and DLR. In the phantom study, the aortic root and the left main coronary artery in the chest phantom were simulated using a needleless syringe. The patients were classified into three groups according to their body mass index. Noise, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured for image quantification. A subjective analysis was also performed for FBP, IR, and DLR.

RESULTS

According to the phantom study, DLR reduced noise by 59.8% compared to FBP and increased SNR and CNR by 121.4% and 123.6%, respectively. In a patient study, DLR reduced noise compared to FBP and IR. Furthermore, DLR increased the SNR and CNR more than FBP and IR. In terms of subjective scores, DLR was higher than FBP and IR.

CONCLUSION

In both phantom and patient studies, DLR effectively reduced image noise and improved SNR and CNR. Therefore, the DLR may be useful for CCTA examinations.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the radiation dose of computed tomography in hybrid nuclear medicine imaging

BACKGROUND

While diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are well-established for the radiopharmaceutical part, published DRLs for the CT component of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides an overview of the different objectives of CT in hybrid imaging and summarizes reported CT dose values for the most common PET/CT and SPECT/CT examinations. Also, an overview of already proposed national DRLs is given.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles reporting CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and/or national DRLs for the most frequently performed PET/CT and/or SPECT/CT examinations. Data were grouped according to the clinical objective: diagnostic (D-CT), anatomical localisation (AL-CT) or attenuation correction (AC-CT) CT. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles were identified of which twelve reported national DRLs. For brain and tumour PET/CT imaging, CTDIvol and DLP values were higher for a D-CT (brain: 26.7 mGy, 483 mGy cm; tumour: 8.8 mGy, 697 mGy cm) than for an AC/AL-CT (brain: 11.3 mGy, 216 mGy cm; tumour: 4.3 mGy, 419 mGy cm). Similar conclusions were found for bone and parathyroid SPECT/CT studies: D-CT (bone: 6.5 mGy, 339 mGy cm; parathyroid: 15.1 mGy, 347 mGy cm) results in higher doses than AL-CT (bone: 3.8 mGy, 156 mGy cm; parathyroid: 4.9 mGy, 166 mGy cm). For cardiac (AC-CT), mIBG/octreotide, thyroid and post-thyroid ablation (AC/AL-CT) SPECT/CT pooled mean CTDIvol (DLP) values were 1.8 mGy (33 mGy cm), 4.6 mGy (208 mGy cm), 3.1 mGy (105 mGy cm) and 4.6 mGy (145 mGy cm), respectively. For all examinations, high variability in nuclear medicine practice was observed.

CONCLUSION

The large variation in CT dose values and national DRLs highlights the need for optimisation in hybrid imaging and justifies the clinical implementation for nuclear medicine specific DRLs.

Clinical Feasibility of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

This study evaluated the feasibility of deep-learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). By using a 20 cm water phantom, the noise reduction ratio and noise power spectrum were evaluated according to the different reconstruction methods. Then 46 patients who underwent CCTA were retrospectively enrolled. CCTA was performed using the 16 cm coverage axial volume scan technique. All CT images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP); three model-based iterative reconstructions (MBIR) of 40%, 60%, and 80%; and three DLIR algorithms: low (L), medium (M), and high (H). Quantitative and qualitative image qualities of CCTA were compared according to the reconstruction methods. In the phantom study, the noise reduction ratios of MBIR-40%, MBIR-60%, MBIR-80%, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H were 26.7 ± 0.2%, 39.5 ± 0.5%, 51.7 ± 0.4%, 33.1 ± 0.8%, 43.2 ± 0.8%, and 53.5 ± 0.1%, respectively. The pattern of the noise power spectrum of the DLIR images was more similar to FBP images than MBIR images. In a CCTA study, CCTA yielded a significantly lower noise index with DLIR-H reconstruction than with the other reconstruction methods. DLIR-H showed a higher SNR and CNR than MBIR (p < 0.05). The qualitative image quality of CCTA with DLIR-H was significantly higher than that of MBIR-80% or FBP. The DLIR algorithm was feasible and yielded a better image quality than the FBP or MBIR algorithms on CCTA.

Deep learning-based reconstruction can improve the image quality of low radiation dose head CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the image quality of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR), model-based (MBIR), and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms for lower-dose (LD) unenhanced head CT and compare it with those of standard-dose (STD) HIR images.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 114 patients who underwent unenhanced head CT using the STD (n = 57) or LD (n = 57) protocol on a 320-row CT. STD images were reconstructed with HIR; LD images were reconstructed with HIR (LD-HIR), MBIR (LD-MBIR), and DLR (LD-DLR). The image noise, gray and white matter (GM-WM) contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the basal ganglia and posterior fossa levels were quantified. The noise magnitude, noise texture, GM-WM contrast, image sharpness, streak artifact, and subjective acceptability were independently scored by three radiologists (1 = worst, 5 = best). The lesion conspicuity of LD-HIR, LD-MBIR, and LD-DLR was ranked through side-by-side assessments (1 = worst, 3 = best). Reconstruction times of three algorithms were measured.

RESULTS

The effective dose of LD was 25% lower than that of STD. Lower image noise, higher GM-WM contrast, and higher CNR were observed in LD-DLR and LD-MBIR than those in STD (all, p ≤ 0.035). Compared with STD, the noise texture, image sharpness, and subjective acceptability were inferior for LD-MBIR and superior for LD-DLR (all, p < 0.001). The lesion conspicuity of LD-DLR (2.9 ± 0.2) was higher than that of HIR (1.2 ± 0.3) and MBIR (1.8 ± 0.4) (all, p < 0.001). Reconstruction times of HIR, MBIR, and DLR were 11 ± 1, 319 ± 17, and 24 ± 1 s, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DLR can enhance the image quality of head CT while preserving low radiation dose level and short reconstruction time.

KEY POINTS

• For unenhanced head CT, DLR reduced the image noise and improved the GM-WM contrast and lesion delineation without sacrificing the natural noise texture and image sharpness relative to HIR. • The subjective and objective image quality of DLR was better than that of HIR even at 25% reduced dose without considerably increasing the image reconstruction times (24 s vs. 11 s). • Despite the strong noise reduction and improved GM-WM contrast performance, MBIR degraded the noise texture, sharpness, and subjective acceptance with prolonged reconstruction times relative to HIR, potentially hampering its feasibility.

Radiation Doses in Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

We discussed the contemporary views on the effects of ionising radiation on living organisms and the process of estimating radiation doses in CT examinations and the definitions of the CTDI, CTDIvol, DLP, SSDE, ED. We reviewed the reports from large analyses on the radiation doses in CT examinations of the coronary arteries prior to TAVI procedures, including the CRESCENT, PROTECTION, German Cardiac CT Registry studies. These studies were carried out over the last 10 years and can help confront the daily practice of performing cardiovascular CT examinations in most centres. The reference dose levels for these examinations were also collected. The methods to optimise the radiation dose included tube voltage reduction, ECG-monitored tube current modulation, iterative and deep learning reconstruction techniques, a reduction in the scan range, prospective study protocols, automatic exposure control, heart rate control, rational use of the calcium score, multi-slices and dual-source and wide-field tomography. We also present the studies that indicated the need to raise the organ conversion factor for cardiovascular studies from the 0.014-0.017 mSv/mGy*cm used for chest studies to date to a value of 0.0264-0.03 mSv/mGy*cm.

Paediatric CT made easy

Paediatric computed tomography (CT) imaging has always been associated with challenges. Although the technical background of CT imaging is complex, it is worth considering the baseline aspects of radiation exposure to prevent unwanted excess radiation in paediatric patients. In this review, we discuss the most relevant factors influencing radiation exposure, and provide a simplified and practical approach to optimise paediatric CT.

Impact of radiation dose reduction and iterative image reconstruction on CT-guided spine biopsies

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of dose reduction on image quality and confidence for intervention planning and guidance regarding computed tomography (CT)-based intervertebral disc and vertebral body biopsies. We retrospectively analyzed 96 patients who underwent multi-detector CT (MDCT) acquired for the purpose of biopsies, which were either derived from scanning with standard dose (SD) or low dose (LD; using tube current reduction). The SD cases were matched to LD cases considering sex, age, level of biopsy, presence of spinal instrumentation, and body diameter. All images for planning (reconstruction: "IMR1") and periprocedural guidance (reconstruction: "iDose4") were evaluated by two readers (R1 and R2) using Likert scales. Image noise was measured using attenuation values of paraspinal muscle tissue. The dose length product (DLP) was statistically significantly lower for LD scans regarding the planning scans (SD: 13.8 ± 8.2 mGy*cm, LD: 8.1 ± 4.4 mGy*cm, p < 0.01) and the interventional guidance scans (SD: 43.0 ± 48.8 mGy*cm, LD: 18.4 ± 7.3 mGy*cm, p < 0.01). Image quality, contrast, determination of the target structure, and confidence for planning or intervention guidance were rated good to perfect for SD and LD scans, showing no statistically significant differences between SD and LD scans (p > 0.05). Image noise was similar between SD and LD scans performed for planning of the interventional procedures (SD: 14.62 ± 2.83 HU vs. LD: 15.45 ± 3.22 HU, p = 0.24). Use of a LD protocol for MDCT-guided biopsies along the spine is a practical alternative, maintaining overall image quality and confidence. Increasing availability of model-based iterative reconstruction in clinical routine may facilitate further radiation dose reductions.

Is it possible to use low-dose deep learning reconstruction for the detection of liver metastases on CT routinely?

OBJECTIVES

To compare the image quality and hepatic metastasis detection of low-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with full-dose filtered back projection (FBP)/iterative reconstruction (IR).

METHODS

A contrast-detail phantom consisting of low-contrast objects was scanned at five CT dose index levels (10, 6, 3, 2, and 1 mGy). A total of 154 participants with 305 hepatic lesions who underwent abdominal CT were enrolled in a prospective non-inferiority trial with a three-arm design based on phantom results. Data sets with full dosage (13.6 mGy) and low dosages (9.5, 6.8, or 4.1 mGy) were acquired from two consecutive portal venous acquisitions, respectively. All images were reconstructed with FBP (reference), IR (control), and DLIR (test). Eleven readers evaluated phantom data sets for object detectability using a two-alternative forced-choice approach. Non-inferiority analyses were performed to interpret the differences in image quality and metastasis detection of low-dose DLIR relative to full-dose FBP/IR.

RESULTS

The phantom experiment showed the dose reduction potential from DLIR was up to 57% based on the reference FBP dose index. Radiation decreases of 30% and 50% resulted in non-inferior image quality and hepatic metastasis detection with DLIR compared to full-dose FBP/IR. Radiation reduction of 70% by DLIR performed inferiorly in detecting small metastases (< 1 cm) compared to full-dose FBP (difference: -0.112; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.178 to 0.047) and full-dose IR (difference: -0.123; 95% CI: -0.182 to 0.053) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DLIR enables a 50% dose reduction for detecting low-contrast hepatic metastases while maintaining comparable image quality to full-dose FBP and IR.

KEY POINTS

• Non-inferiority study showed that deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) can reduce the dose to oncological patients with low-contrast lesions without compromising the diagnostic information. • Radiation dose levels for DLIR can be reduced to 50% of full-dose FBP and IR for detecting low-contrast hepatic metastases, while maintaining comparable image quality. • The reduction of radiation by 70% by DLIR is clinically acceptable but insufficient for detecting small low-contrast hepatic metastases (< 1 cm).

Lung-Optimized Deep-Learning-Based Reconstruction for Ultralow-Dose CT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the image properties of lung-specialized deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) and its applicability in ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) relative to hybrid- (HIR) and model-based iterative-reconstructions (MBIR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on a 320-row scanner at 50-mA (low-dose-CT 1 [LDCT-1]), 25-mA (LDCT-2), and 10-mA (ULDCT). LDCT were reconstructed with HIR; ULDCT images were reconstructed with HIR (ULDCT-HIR), MBIR (ULDCT-MBIR), and DLR (ULDCT-DLR). Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified. With the LDCT images as reference standards, ULDCT image qualities were subjectively scored on a 5-point scale (1 = substantially inferior to LDCT-2, 3 = comparable to LDCT-2, 5 = comparable to LDCT-1). For task-based image quality analyses, a physical evaluation phantom was scanned at seven doses to achieve the noise levels equivalent to chest phantom; noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were evaluated. Clinical ULDCT (10-mA) images obtained in 14 nonobese patients were reconstructed with HIR, MBIR, and DLR; the subjective acceptability was ranked.

RESULTS

Image noise was lower and CNR was higher in ULDCT-DLR and ULDCT-MBIR than in LDCT-1, LDCT-2, and ULDCT-HIR (p < 0.01). The overall quality of ULDCT-DLR was higher than of ULDCT-HIR and ULDCT-MBIR (p < 0.01), and almost comparable with that of LDCT-2 (mean score: 3.4 ± 0.5). DLR yielded the highest NPS peak frequency and TTF_50% for high-contrast object. In clinical ULDCT images, the subjective acceptability of DLR was higher than of HIR and MBIR (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

DLR optimized for lung CT improves image quality and provides possible greater dose optimization opportunity than HIR and MBIR.

"Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose4: a phantom study at different dose levels"

PURPOSE

To characterize the performance of the Precise Image (PI) deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS

CT images of the Catphan-600 phantom (equipped with an external annulus) were acquired using an abdominal protocol at four dose levels and reconstructed using FBP, iDose⁴ (levels 2,5) and PI ('Soft Tissue' definition, levels 'Sharper','Sharp','Standard','Smooth','Smoother'). Image noise, image non-uniformity, noise power spectrum (NPS), target transfer function (TTF), detectability index (d'), CT numbers accuracy and image histograms were analyzed.

RESULTS

The behavior of the PI algorithm depended strongly on the selected level of reconstruction. The phantom analysis suggested that the PI image noise decreased linearly by varying the level of reconstruction from Sharper to Smoother, expressing a noise reduction up to 80% with respect to FBP. Additionally, the non-uniformity decreased, the histograms became narrower, and d' values increased as PI reconstruction levels changed from Sharper to Smoother. PI had no significant impact on the average CT number of different contrast objects. The conventional FBP NPS was deeply altered only by Smooth and Smoother levels of reconstruction. Furthermore, spatial resolution was found to be dose- and contrast-dependent, but in each analyzed condition it was greater than or comparable to FBP and iDose⁴ TTFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The PI algorithm can reduce image noise with respect to FBP and iDose⁴; spatial resolution, CT numbers and image uniformity are generally preserved by the algorithm but changes in NPS for the Smooth and Smoother levels need to be considered in protocols implementation.

Fully automated accurate patient positioning in computed tomography using anterior-posterior localizer images and a deep neural network: a dual-center study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to improve patient positioning accuracy by relying on a CT localizer and a deep neural network to optimize image quality and radiation dose.

METHODS

We included 5754 chest CT axial and anterior-posterior (AP) images from two different centers, C1 and C2. After pre-processing, images were split into training (80%) and test (20%) datasets. A deep neural network was trained to generate 3D axial images from the AP localizer. The geometric centerlines of patient bodies were indicated by creating a bounding box on the predicted images. The distance between the body centerline, estimated by the deep learning model and ground truth (BCAP), was compared with patient mis-centering during manual positioning (BCMP). We evaluated the performance of our model in terms of distance between the lung centerline estimated by the deep learning model and the ground truth (LCAP).

RESULTS

The error in terms of BCAP was - 0.75 ± 7.73 mm and 2.06 ± 10.61 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. This error was significantly lower than BCMP, which achieved an error of 9.35 ± 14.94 and 13.98 ± 14.5 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. The absolute BCAP was 5.7 ± 5.26 and 8.26 ± 6.96 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. The LCAP metric was 1.56 ± 10.8 and -0.27 ± 16.29 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. The error in terms of BCAP and LCAP was higher for larger patients (p value < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of the proposed method was comparable to available alternative methods, carrying the advantage of being free from errors related to objects blocking the camera visibility.

KEY POINTS

• Patient mis-centering in the anterior-posterior direction (AP) is a common problem in clinical practice which can degrade image quality and increase patient radiation dose. • We proposed a deep neural network for automatic patient positioning using only the CT image localizer, achieving a performance comparable to alternative techniques, such as the external 3D visual camera. • The advantage of the proposed method is that it is free from errors related to objects blocking the camera visibility and that it could be implemented on imaging consoles as a patient positioning support tool.

Artificial intelligence in oncologic imaging

Radiology is integral to cancer care. Compared to molecular assays, imaging has its advantages. Imaging as a noninvasive tool can assess the entirety of tumor unbiased by sampling error and is routinely acquired at multiple time points in oncological practice. Imaging data can be digitally post-processed for quantitative assessment. The ever-increasing application of Artificial intelligence (AI) to clinical imaging is challenging radiology to become a discipline with competence in data science, which plays an important role in modern oncology. Beyond streamlining certain clinical tasks, the power of AI lies in its ability to reveal previously undetected or even imperceptible radiographic patterns that may be difficult to ascertain by the human sensory system. Here, we provide a narrative review of the emerging AI applications relevant to the oncological imaging spectrum and elaborate on emerging paradigms and opportunities. We envision that these technical advances will change radiology in the coming years, leading to the optimization of imaging acquisition and discovery of clinically relevant biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring. Together, they pave the road for future clinical translation in precision oncology.

Comparative Assessment of Noise Properties for Two Deep Learning CT Image Reconstruction Techniques and Filtered Back Projection

BACKGROUND

Two deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) techniques from two different CT vendors have recently been introduced into clinical practice.

PURPOSE

To characterize the noise properties of two DLIR techniques with different training methods, using a phantom containing a simple uniform and a complex non-uniform region.

METHODS

A water-bath phantom with a diameter of 300 mm was used as a base phantom. A textured phantom with a diameter of 128 mm, which was made of two materials, one equivalent to water and the other being 12 mg/mL diluted iodine, irregularly mixed to create a complex texture (non-uniform region), was placed in the base phantom. Thirty repeated phantom scans were performed using two CT scanners (GE, Revolution CT with Apex Edition; Canon, Aquilion One PRISM Edition) at two dose levels (CTDI: 5 and 15 mGy). Images were reconstructed with each CT system's filtered back projection (FBP) and DLIR [GE, TrueFidelity (TF); Canon, Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine Body Sharp (AC)] for three process strengths. For basic characteristics of noise, the standard deviation (SD) and noise power spectrum (NPS) were measured for the uniform (water) region. A noise magnitude map was generated by calculating the inter-image SD at each pixel position across the 30 images. Then, a noise reduction map (NRM), which visualizes the relative differences in noise magnitude between FBP and DLIR, was calculated. The NRM values ranged from 0.0 to 1.0. A low NRM value represents a less aggressive noise reduction. The histograms of the NRM value were analyzed for the uniform and non-uniform regions.

RESULTS

The reduction in noise magnitude compared with FBP tended to be greater with AC (45%-85%) than with TF (32%-65%). The average NPS frequencies of TF and AC were almost comparable to those of FBP, except for the low-dose condition and the high noise reduction strength for AC. The NRM values of TF and AC were higher in the uniform region than in the non-uniform region. In the non-uniform region, TF's average NRM values (0.21-0.48) tended to be lower than AC's (0.39-0.78). The histograms for TF showed a small overlap between the uniform and the non-uniform regions; in contrast, those for AC showed a greater overlap. This difference seems to indicate that TF processes the uniform and non-uniform regions more differently than AC does.

CONCLUSION

This study has revealed a distinct difference in characteristics between the two DLIR techniques: TF tends to offer less aggressive noise reduction in non-uniform regions and preserve the original signals, whereas AC tends to prioritize noise filtering over edge-preservation, especially at the low-dose condition and with the high noise reduction strength. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Accounting for radiation exposure from previous CT exams while deciding on the next exam: What do referring clinicians think?

PURPOSE

To obtain clinicians' views of the need to account for radiation exposure from previous CT scans and the advisability of a regulatory mechanism to control the number of CT scans for an individual patient.

METHODS

A convenience survey was conducted by emailing a link to a three-question electronic survey to clinicians in many countries, mostly through radiology and radiation protection contacts.

RESULTS

505 responses were received from 24 countries. 293 respondents (58%) understand that current regulations do not limit the number of CT scans that can be prescribed for a single patient in a year. When asked whether there should be a regulation to limit the number of CT scans that can be prescribed for a single patient in one year, only a small fraction (143, 28%) answered 'No', 182 (36%) answered 'Maybe' and 166 (33%) answered 'Yes'. Most respondents (337; 67%) think that radiation risk should form part of the consideration when deciding whether to request a CT exam. A minority (138; 27%) think the decision should be based only on the medical indication for the CT exam. Comparison among the 4 countries (South Korea, Hungary, USA and Canada) with the largest number of respondents indicated wide variations in responses.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of the surveyed clinicians consider radiation risk, in addition to clinical factors, when prescribing CT exams. Most respondents are in favor of, or would consider, regulation to control the number of CT scans that could be performed on a patient annually.

Radiation Dose Reduction for 80-kVp Pediatric CT Using Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction: A Clinical and Phantom Study

BACKGROUND. Deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) may facilitate CT radiation dose reduction, but a paucity of literature has compared lower-dose DLR images with standard-dose iterative reconstruction (IR) images or explored application of DLR to low-tube-voltage scanning in children. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess whether DLR can be used to reduce radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality in comparison with hybrid IR (HIR) and model-based IR (MBIR) for low-tube-voltage pediatric CT. METHODS. This retrospective study included children 6 years old or younger who underwent contrast-enhanced 80-kVp CT with a standard-dose or lower-dose protocol. Standard images were reconstructed with HIR, and lower-dose images were reconstructed with HIR, MBIR, and DLR. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) was calculated for both protocols. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified. Two radiologists independently evaluated noise magnitude, noise texture, streak artifact, edge sharpness, and overall quality. Interreader agreement was assessed, and mean values were calculated. To evaluate task-based object detection performance, a phantom was imaged with 80-kVp CT at six doses (SSDE, 0.6-5.3 mGy). Detectability index (d') was calculated from the noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function. Reconstruction methods were compared. RESULTS. Sixty-five children (mean age, 25.0 ± 25.2 months) who underwent CT with standard- (n = 31) or lower-dose (n = 34) protocol were included. SSDE was 54% lower for the lower-dose than for the standard-dose group (1.9 ± 0.4 vs 4.1 ± 0.8 mGy). Lower-dose DLR and MBIR yielded lower image noise and higher SNR and CNR than standard-dose HIR (p < .05). Interobserver agreement on subjective features ranged from a kappa coefficient of 0.68 to 0.78. The readers subjectively scored noise texture, edge sharpness, and overall quality lower for lower-dose MBIR than for standard-dose HIR (p < .001), though higher for lower-dose DLR than for standard-dose HIR (p < .001). In the phantom, DLR provided higher d' than HIR and MBIR at each dose. Object detectability was greater for 2.0-mGy DLR than for 4.0-mGy HIR for low-contrast (3.67 vs 3.57) and high-contrast (1.20 vs 1.04) objects. CONCLUSION. Compared with IR algorithms, DLR results in substantial dose reduction with preserved or even improved image quality for low-tube-voltage pediatric CT. CLINICAL IMPACT. Use of DLR at 80 kVp allows greater dose reduction for pediatric CT than do current IR techniques.

Artificial Intelligence for Radiation Dose Optimization in Pediatric Radiology: A Systematic Review

Radiation dose optimization is particularly important in pediatric radiology, as children are more susceptible to potential harmful effects of ionizing radiation. However, only one narrative review about artificial intelligence (AI) for dose optimization in pediatric computed tomography (CT) has been published yet. The purpose of this systematic review is to answer the question “What are the AI techniques and architectures introduced in pediatric radiology for dose optimization, their specific application areas, and performances?” Literature search with use of electronic databases was conducted on 3 June 2022. Sixteen articles that met selection criteria were included. The included studies showed deep convolutional neural network (CNN) was the most common AI technique and architecture used for dose optimization in pediatric radiology. All but three included studies evaluated AI performance in dose optimization of abdomen, chest, head, neck, and pelvis CT; CT angiography; and dual-energy CT through deep learning image reconstruction. Most studies demonstrated that AI could reduce radiation dose by 36–70% without losing diagnostic information. Despite the dominance of commercially available AI models based on deep CNN with promising outcomes, homegrown models could provide comparable performances. Future exploration of AI value for dose optimization in pediatric radiology is necessary due to small sample sizes and narrow scopes (only three modalities, CT, positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and mobile radiography, and not all examination types covered) of existing studies.

Radiation dose optimization potential of deep learning-based reconstruction for multiphase hepatic CT: A clinical and phantom study

PURPOSE

This clinical and phantom study aimed to evaluate the impact of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) on image quality and its radiation dose optimization capability for multiphase hepatic CT relative to hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR).

METHODS

Task-based image quality was assessed with a physical evaluation phantom; the high- and low-contrast detectability of HIR and DLR images were computed from the noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function at five different size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) values in the range 5.3 to 18.0-mGy. For the clinical study, images of 73 patients who had undergone multiphase hepatic CT under both standard-dose (STD) and lower-dose (LD) examination protocols within a time interval of about four-months on average, were retrospectively examined. STD images were reconstructed with HIR, while LD with HIR (LD-HIR) and DLR (LD-DLR). SSDE, quantitative image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between protocols. The noise magnitude, noise texture, streak artifact, image sharpness, interface smoothness, and overall image quality were subjectively rated by two independent radiologists.

RESULTS

In phantom study, the high- and low-contrast detectability of DLR images obtained at 5.3-mGy and 7.3-mGy, respectively, were slightly higher than those obtained with HIR at the STD protocol dose (18.0-mGy). In clinical study, LD-DLR yielded lower image noise, higher CNR, and higher subjective scores for all evaluation criteria than STD (all, p ≤ 0.05), despite having 52.8% lower SSDE (8.0 ± 2.5 vs. 16.8 ± 3.4-mGy).

CONCLUSIONS

DLR improved the subjective and objective image quality of multiphase hepatic CT compared with HIR techniques, even at approximately half the radiation dose.

Artificial Intelligence (Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Network) for Calcium Deblooming in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Feasibility Study

Background: The presence of heavy calcification in the coronary artery always presents a challenge for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in assessing the degree of coronary stenosis due to blooming artifacts associated with calcified plaques. Our study purpose was to use an advanced artificial intelligence (enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial network [ESRGAN]) model to suppress the blooming artifact in CCTA and determine its effect on improving the diagnostic performance of CCTA in calcified plaques. Methods: A total of 184 calcified plaques from 50 patients who underwent both CCTA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were analysed with measurements of coronary lumen on the original CCTA, and three sets of ESRGAN-processed images including ESRGAN-high-resolution (ESRGAN-HR), ESRGAN-average and ESRGAN-median with ICA as the reference method for determining sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: ESRGAN-processed images improved the specificity and PPV at all three coronary arteries (LAD-left anterior descending, LCx-left circumflex and RCA-right coronary artery) compared to original CCTA with ESRGAN-median resulting in the highest values being 41.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30%, 52.7%) and 26.9% (95% CI: 22.9%, 31.4%) at LAD; 41.7% (95% CI: 22.1%, 63.4%) and 36.4% (95% CI: 28.9%, 44.5%) at LCx; 55% (95% CI: 38.5%, 70.7%) and 47.1% (95% CI: 38.7%, 55.6%) at RCA; while corresponding values for original CCTA were 21.8% (95% CI: 13.2%, 32.6%) and 22.8% (95% CI: 20.8%, 24.9%); 12.5% (95% CI: 2.6%, 32.4%) and 27.6% (95% CI: 24.7%, 30.7%); 17.5% (95% CI: 7.3%, 32.8%) and 32.7% (95% CI: 29.6%, 35.9%) at LAD, LCx and RCA, respectively. There was no significant effect on sensitivity and NPV between the original CCTA and ESRGAN-processed images at all three coronary arteries. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was the highest with ESRGAN-median images at the RCA level with values being 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.89), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.93), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.94) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.96) corresponding to original CCTA and ESRGAN-HR, average and median images, respectively. Conclusions: This feasibility study shows the potential value of ESRGAN-processed images in improving the diagnostic value of CCTA for patients with calcified plaques.

Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of reduced-dose computed tomography enterography with model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric Crohn's disease patients

This study assessed the image quality and diagnostic accuracy in determining disease activity of the terminal ileum of the reduced-dose computed tomography enterography using model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Eighteen patients were prospectively enrolled and allocated to the standard-dose (SD) and reduced-dose (RD) computed tomography enterography (CTE) groups (n = 9 per group). Image quality, reader confidence in interpreting bowel findings, accuracy in determining active CD in the terminal ileum, and radiation dose were evaluated. Objective image quality did not show intergroup differences, except for image sharpness. Although reader confidence in detecting mural stratification, ulcer, and perienteric fat stranding of the RD-CTE were inferior to SD-CTE, RD-CTE correctly diagnosed active disease in all patients. The mean values of radiation dose metrics (SD-CTE vs. RD-CTE) were 4.3 versus 0.74 mGy, 6.1 versus 1.1 mGy, 211.9 versus 34.5 mGy∙cm, and 4.4 versus 0.7 mSv mGy∙cm for CTDI_vol, size-specific dose estimation, dose-length product, and effective dose, respectively. RD-CTE showed comparable diagnostic accuracy to SD-CTE in determining active disease of the terminal ileum in pediatric CD patients. However, image quality and reader confidence in detecting ulcer and perienteric fat stranding was compromised.