1
|
Doran S, Whiriskey R, Sheehy N, Johnston C, Byrne D. Perineural tumour spread in head and neck cancer: a pictorial review. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:749-756. [PMID: 39122633 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
Perineural tumour spread in head and neck cancer can be a challenging diagnosis for radiologists; head and neck anatomy is intimidating and perineural tumour spread can be subtle and difficult to detect. It results in significant morbidity for patients, can upstage disease and will frequently result in more prolonged treatment courses. This pictorial review provides a thorough examination of the imaging characteristics of perineural tumour spread in head and neck malignancy. It highlights key imaging features, from initial diagnosis to its post-therapy appearance, emphasising the clinical relevance and role of imaging in post-therapy assessment. Multi-modality imaging examples are included with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). MRI features of perineural tumour spread include intermediate T2 signal expansion of a nerve, abnormal enhancement extending along a nerve, expansion of a skull or neural foramen and loss of normal fat planes surrounding nerve pathways. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is a useful adjunct to MRI, perineural tumour spread results in abnormal FDG accumulation in a linear fashion anatomically spreading along a nerve pathway. Knowledge of these features and useful check areas will ensure that radiologists can be confident both in making the diagnosis and re-assessment post-therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Doran
- Department of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - R Whiriskey
- Department of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - N Sheehy
- Department of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - C Johnston
- Department of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - D Byrne
- Department of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chan TG, Wicks J, Sethi I, Becker J, Brandon D, Schmitt NC, Kaka A, Boyce B, Baddour HM, El-Deiry MW, Patel MR, Gross JH. Radiologic findings of occult nodal metastasis during clinically-N0 salvage total laryngectomy. Head Neck 2024. [PMID: 39092682 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Occult nodal disease (OND) during clinically-N0 salvage total laryngectomy (TL) can be detected with the Neck-Imaging-Reporting-and-Data-Systems (NI-RADS). However, some patients will still have OND revealed on final pathology. METHODS A retrospective study on all patients who had OND during salvage TL with elective neck dissection (END) between 2009 and 2021 was performed. Repeat CT and PET scan interpretation was performed to evaluate their preoperative imaging for suspicious features. RESULTS Among 81 salvage TL patients undergoing END, 12 (16%) had OND and a total of 26 occult nodes were identified. On pathology, the average node length [SD] was 0.6 cm [0.3]. On CT, 31% (8 of 26) had rounded morphology. On PET, most had SUVmax below blood pool. One patient scored NI-RADS 2; the rest scored 1. CONCLUSIONS On re-review of preoperative imaging, occult nodes were subtle and challenging to identify. Despite no clear impact on survival, performing an END may provide prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler G Chan
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jaime Wicks
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ila Sethi
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jennifer Becker
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David Brandon
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nicole C Schmitt
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Azeem Kaka
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brian Boyce
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Harry Michael Baddour
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mark W El-Deiry
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mihir R Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jennifer H Gross
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thariat J, Carsuzaa F, Beddok A, Deneuve S, Marcy PY, Merlotti A, Dejean C, Devauchelle B. Reconstructive flap surgery in head and neck cancer patients: an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in postoperative radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1379861. [PMID: 38665951 PMCID: PMC11043495 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1379861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Major advances have been made in reconstructive surgery in the last decades to reduce morbidity in head and neck cancer. Flaps are now present in 80% of patients with oral cavity cancer to cover anatomic, functional, and cosmetic needs. However, gaps in interdisciplinary innovation transfer from surgery to postoperative radiotherapy (poRT) remain challenging. We aimed to provide an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in planning head and neck postoperative radiotherapy. Methods A systematic and critical review was conducted to address areas of optimization in surgery and radiology that may be relevant to poRT. Results Despite extensive surgical literature on flap techniques and salvage surgery, 13 retrospective series were identified, where flap outcomes were indirectly compared between surgery alone or poRT. These low-evidence studies suggest that radiotherapy accelerates flap atrophy, fibrosis, and osteoradionecrosis and deteriorates functional outcomes. Preliminary evidence suggests that tumor spread occurs at the flap-tissue junction rather than in the flaps. One prospective 15-patient study showed 31.3% vs. 39.2% flap volume reduction without or with poRT. In an international consensus, experts recognized the needs for optimized flap-sparing poRT against flap-related functional deterioration and bone damage. CT, MRI, and PET-CT modalities show potential for the delineation of the junction area between native tissues and flap for flap segmentation and to characterize flap-specific changes quantitatively and correlate them with patterns of relapse or complications. Conclusion Flap management in poRT is insufficiently documented, but poRT seems to damage flaps. Current gaps in knowledge underscore the need for prospective flap assessment and interdisciplinary trials investigating flap morbidity minimization by flap-sparing poRT planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
- Corpuscular Physics Laboratory, IN2P3, Ensicaen, CNRS UMR 6534, Caen, France
- Faculté de Médecine de Caen, Université de Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Florent Carsuzaa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Arnaud Beddok
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, Orsay, France
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sophie Deneuve
- Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Lyon, France
- Inserm, U1296 Unit, “Radiation: Defense, Health and Environment”, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Marcy
- Polyclinics ELSAN Group, Department of Radiodiagnostics and Interventional Imaging, PolyClinics Les Fleurs, Ollioules, France
| | - Anna Merlotti
- Radiotherapy Department, S. Croce & Carle Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | - Bernard Devauchelle
- Departement of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Amiens Picardy, Research Unit, UR7516 CHIMERE, University of Picardy Jules Verne, Institut Faire Faces, Amiens, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lathika AG, Jayasankaran SC, Chelakkot PG, Thankappan K, Moorthy S. Diagnostic efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in detecting local tumor recurrence in patients with head and neck malignancies after definitive treatment. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20:793-801. [PMID: 39023585 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1775_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Accurate interpretation of post-treatment imaging in head and neck malignancies poses a challenge due to treatment sequelae. Magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion helps in this scenario by evaluating the hemodynamic characteristics of lesions. This study aimed to elucidate the diagnostic efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MR perfusion imaging in detecting recurrence in patients after they underwent definitive treatment for head and neck tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty patients who had received definitive curative-intent treatment for histopathology-proven malignant head and neck tumors and in whom recurrent tumor was detected on precontrast MR imaging (MRI) were accrued in the study. Patients underwent DCE-MR perfusion imaging. Time to peak (TTP), relative maximum enhancement (RME), and relative washout (RWO) ratio were calculated by using time-intensity curve (TIC). The diagnostic accuracy was compared with histopathology. RESULTS A cut-off value of ≥125.3 for RME showed a sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 66.7% for differentiating post-radiation changes and recurrence. The optimal cut-off for RWO ratio was ≥-6.24 with a sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 55.6%. The optimal cut-off of TTP was ≤45.8 s with a sensitivity of 61.9% and specificity of 77.8%. Diagnostic accuracies of RME, RWO, and TTP were 73.3%, 70%, and 66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS DCE-MRI had significant diagnostic accuracy in detecting and differentiating recurrences. TIC analysis of high-temporal resolution DCE-MRI can provide information regarding microcirculation of tumors, and hence can be considered as an imaging modality of choice for assessment of early local tumor recurrence in head and neck tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand G Lathika
- Department of Radiology, S P Multi-Speciality Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
| | - Sandya C Jayasankaran
- Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Prameela G Chelakkot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Krishnakumar Thankappan
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Srikanth Moorthy
- Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hiyama T, Miyasaka Y, Kuno H, Sekiya K, Sakashita S, Shinozaki T, Kobayashi T. Posttreatment Head and Neck Cancer Imaging: Anatomic Considerations Based on Cancer Subsites. Radiographics 2024; 44:e230099. [PMID: 38386602 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Posttreatment imaging surveillance of head and neck cancer is challenging owing to complex anatomic subsites and diverse treatment modalities. Early detection of residual disease or recurrence through surveillance imaging is crucial for devising optimal treatment strategies. Posttreatment imaging surveillance is performed using CT, fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, and MRI. Radiologists should be familiar with postoperative imaging findings that can vary depending on surgical procedures and reconstruction methods that are used, which is dictated by the primary subsite and extent of the tumor. Morphologic changes in normal structures or denervation of muscles within the musculocutaneous flap may mimic recurrent tumors. Recurrence is more likely to occur at the resection margin, margin of the reconstructed flap, and deep sites that are difficult to access surgically. Radiation therapy also has a varying dose distribution depending on the primary site, resulting in various posttreatment changes. Normal tissues are affected by radiation, with edema and inflammation occurring in the early stages and fibrosis in the late stages. Distinguishing scar tissue from residual tumor becomes necessary, as radiation therapy may leave behind residual scar tissue. Local recurrence should be carefully evaluated within areas where these postradiation changes occur. Head and Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a standardized reporting and risk classification system with guidance for subsequent management. Familiarity with NI-RADS has implications for establishing surveillance protocols, interpreting posttreatment images, and management decisions. Knowledge of posttreatment imaging characteristics of each subsite of head and neck cancers and the areas prone to recurrence empowers radiologists to detect recurrences at early stages. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions in the supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Hiyama
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.H., Y.M., H.K., K.S., T.K.), Pathology and Clinical Laboratories (S.S.), and Head and Neck Surgery (T.S.), National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| | - Yusuke Miyasaka
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.H., Y.M., H.K., K.S., T.K.), Pathology and Clinical Laboratories (S.S.), and Head and Neck Surgery (T.S.), National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kuno
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.H., Y.M., H.K., K.S., T.K.), Pathology and Clinical Laboratories (S.S.), and Head and Neck Surgery (T.S.), National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| | - Kotaro Sekiya
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.H., Y.M., H.K., K.S., T.K.), Pathology and Clinical Laboratories (S.S.), and Head and Neck Surgery (T.S.), National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| | - Shingo Sakashita
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.H., Y.M., H.K., K.S., T.K.), Pathology and Clinical Laboratories (S.S.), and Head and Neck Surgery (T.S.), National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| | - Takeshi Shinozaki
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.H., Y.M., H.K., K.S., T.K.), Pathology and Clinical Laboratories (S.S.), and Head and Neck Surgery (T.S.), National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kobayashi
- From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (T.H., Y.M., H.K., K.S., T.K.), Pathology and Clinical Laboratories (S.S.), and Head and Neck Surgery (T.S.), National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brahmbhatt S, Overfield CJ, Rhyner PA, Bhatt AA. Imaging of the Posttreatment Head and Neck: Expected Findings and Potential Complications. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2024; 6:e230155. [PMID: 38276904 PMCID: PMC10825710 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Interpretation of posttreatment imaging findings in patients with head and neck cancer can pose a substantial challenge. Malignancies in this region are often managed through surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and newer approaches like immunotherapy. After treatment, patients may experience various expected changes, including mucositis, soft-tissue inflammation, laryngeal edema, and salivary gland inflammation. Imaging techniques such as CT, MRI, and PET scans help differentiate these changes from tumor recurrence. Complications such as osteoradionecrosis, chondroradionecrosis, and radiation-induced vasculopathy can arise because of radiation effects. Radiation-induced malignancies may occur in the delayed setting. This review article emphasizes the importance of posttreatment surveillance imaging to ensure proper care of patients with head and neck cancer and highlights the complexities in distinguishing between expected treatment effects and potential complications. Keywords: CT, MR Imaging, Radiation Therapy, Ear/Nose/Throat, Head/Neck, Nervous-Peripheral, Bone Marrow, Calvarium, Carotid Arteries, Jaw, Face, Larynx © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneh Brahmbhatt
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd,
Cannaday Building and Davis Building, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Cameron J. Overfield
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd,
Cannaday Building and Davis Building, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Patricia A. Rhyner
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd,
Cannaday Building and Davis Building, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Alok A. Bhatt
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd,
Cannaday Building and Davis Building, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mahajan A, Unde H, Sable NP, Shukla S, Vaish R, Patil V, Agarwal U, Agrawal A, Noronha V, Joshi A, Kapoor A, Menon N, Agarwal JP, Laskar SG, Dcruz AK, Chaturvedi P, Pai P, Rane SU, Bal M, Patil A, Prabhash K. Response assessment of post-treatment head and neck cancers to determine further management using NI-RADS (Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System): a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1200366. [PMID: 37810970 PMCID: PMC10552531 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1200366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Interpreting complex post-treatment changes in head and neck cancer (HNC) is challenging with further added perplexity due to variable interobserver interpretation and hence evolved the NI-RADS lexicon. We evaluated the accuracy of NI-RADS in predicting disease status on 1st post-treatment follow-up CECT in a homogenous cohort of those who received only chemoradiation. Methods Retrospective analysis of imaging was done for LASHNC patients who received radical chemoradiation in an open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 3 randomized trial (2012-2018) randomly assigned to either radical radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin (CRT) or CRT with the same schedule plus weekly nimotuzumab (NCRT). 536 patients were accrued, and 74 patients who did not undergo PET/CECT after 8 weeks post-CRT were excluded. After assessing 462 patients for eligibility to allocate NI-RADS at primary and node sites, 435 cases fell in the Primary disease cohort and 412 cases in the Node disease cohort. We evaluated sensitivity, disease prevalence, the positive and negative predictive value of the NI-RADS lexicon, and accuracy, which were expressed as percentages. We also prepared flow charts to determine concordance with allocated NI-RADS category and established accuracy with which it can identify disease status. Results Out of 435 primary disease cohort, 92%, 55%, 48%,70% were concordant and had 100%, 72%, 70%, 82% accuracy in NI-RADS1 (n=12), NI-RADS2 (n=261), NIRADS3 (n=105), and NI-RADS 4 (n=60) respectively. Out of 412 nodes disease cohort, 95%, 90%, 48%, 70%were concordant and had 92%, 97%, 90%, 67% accuracy in NI-RADS1 (n=57), NI-RADS2 (n=255), NI-RADS3 (n=105) and NI-RADS4 (n=60) respectively. % concordance of PET/CT and CECT across all primary and node disease cohorts revealed that PET/CT was 91% concordant in primary NI-RADS2 as compared to 55% concordance of CECT whereas concordance of CECT was better with 57% in primary NI-RADS3 cohort as compared to PET/CT concordance of 41%. Conclusion The accuracy with which the NI-RADS lexicon performed in our study at node sites was better than that at the primary site. There is a great scope of research to understand if CECT performs better over clinical disease status in NI-RADS 3 and 4 categories. Further research should be carried out to understand if PET/CECT can be used for close interval follow-up in stage III/IV NI-RADS 2 cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Mahajan
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Himangi Unde
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Nilesh P. Sable
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shreya Shukla
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Richa Vaish
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vijay Patil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ujjwal Agarwal
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Archi Agrawal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Vanita Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Amit Joshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Akhil Kapoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Nandini Menon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Jai Prakash Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Anil Keith Dcruz
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Pankaj Chaturvedi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Prathamesh Pai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Swapnil Ulhas Rane
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Munita Bal
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Asawari Patil
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Santer M, Riechelmann H, Hofauer B, Schmutzhard J, Freysinger W, Runge A, Gottfried TM, Zelger P, Widmann G, Kranebitter H, Mangesius S, Mangesius J, Kocher F, Dejaco D. Radiomic Assessment of Radiation-Induced Alterations of Skeletal Muscle Composition in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma within the Currently Clinically Defined Optimal Time Window for Salvage Surgery-A Pilot Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4650. [PMID: 37760620 PMCID: PMC10527389 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) frequently require primary radiochemotherapy (RCT). Despite intensity modulation, the desired radiation-induced effects observed in HNSCC may also be observed as side effects in healthy tissue, e.g., the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM). These side effects (e.g., tissue fibrosis) depend on the interval between the completion of RCT and restaging CT. For salvage surgery, the optimal time window for surgery is currently clinically postulated at between 6 and 12 weeks after completion of RCT. Thus, no extensive tissue fibrosis is to be expected. This interval is based on clinical studies exploring surgical complications. Studies directly exploring radiation-induced changes of the SCM in HNSCC patients are sparse. The present study quantified tissue alterations in the SCM and paravertebral musculature (PVM) after RCT, applying radiomics to determine the optimal time window for salvage surgery. Three radiomic key parameters, (1) volume, (2) mean positivity of pixels (MPP), and (3) uniformity, were extracted with mint LesionTM in the staging CTs and restaging CTs of 98 HNSCC patients. Of these, 25 were female, the mean age was 62 (±9.6) years, and 80.9% were UICC Stage IV. The mean restaging interval was 55 (±28; range 29-229) days. Only the mean volume significantly decreased after RCT, from 9.0 to 8.4 and 96.5 to 91.9 mL for the SCM and PVM, respectively (both p = 0.007, both Cohen's d = 0.28). In addition, the mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 23.9 (±4.2) to 21.0 (±3.6) kg/m² (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.9). The mean BMI decreased significantly and was correlated with the volume decrease for the SCM (r = 0.27; p = 0.007) and PVM (r = 0.41; p < 0.001). If t-test p-values were adjusted for the BMI decrease, no significant change in volumes for the SCM and PVM was observed (both p > 0.05). The present data support the clinically postulated optimal interval for salvage surgery of 6 to 12 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Santer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.S.); (H.R.); (B.H.); (J.S.); (W.F.); (A.R.); (T.M.G.)
| | - Herbert Riechelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.S.); (H.R.); (B.H.); (J.S.); (W.F.); (A.R.); (T.M.G.)
| | - Benedikt Hofauer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.S.); (H.R.); (B.H.); (J.S.); (W.F.); (A.R.); (T.M.G.)
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.S.); (H.R.); (B.H.); (J.S.); (W.F.); (A.R.); (T.M.G.)
| | - Wolfgang Freysinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.S.); (H.R.); (B.H.); (J.S.); (W.F.); (A.R.); (T.M.G.)
| | - Annette Runge
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.S.); (H.R.); (B.H.); (J.S.); (W.F.); (A.R.); (T.M.G.)
| | - Timo Maria Gottfried
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.S.); (H.R.); (B.H.); (J.S.); (W.F.); (A.R.); (T.M.G.)
| | - Philipp Zelger
- Department for Hearing, Voice and Speech Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Gerlig Widmann
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (G.W.); (H.K.)
| | - Hanna Kranebitter
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (G.W.); (H.K.)
| | - Stephanie Mangesius
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Julian Mangesius
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Florian Kocher
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck (CCCI), Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniel Dejaco
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.S.); (H.R.); (B.H.); (J.S.); (W.F.); (A.R.); (T.M.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cheng PC, Chang CM, Liao LJ, Hsieh CH, Shueng PW, Cheng PW, Lo WC. Ultrasound Is Beneficial to Determine Lymphadenopathy in Oral Cancer Patients after Radiotherapy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2409. [PMID: 37510156 PMCID: PMC10378444 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate whether the addition of ultrasound (US) +/- fine needle aspiration (FNA) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) improves the diagnostic accuracy in assessing neck lymphadenopathy in oral cancer patients after neck irradiation. We retrospectively reviewed oral cancer patients who had neck lymphadenopathy after radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) from February 2008 to November 2019. The following diagnostic modalities were assessed: (1) MRI/CT, (2) MRI/CT with a post-RT US predictive model, and (3) MRI/CT with US + FNA. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic performance. A total of 104 irradiation-treated oral cancer patients who subsequently had neck lymphadenopathy were recruited and analyzed. Finally, there were 68 (65%) malignant and 36 (35%) benign lymphadenopathies. In terms of the diagnostic performance, the area under the ROC curves (C-statistics) was 0.983, 0.920, and 0.828 for MRI/CT with US + FNA, MRI/CT with a post-RT US predictive model, and MRI/CT, respectively. The addition of US to MRI/CT to evaluate cervical lymphadenopathy could achieve a better diagnostic accuracy than MRI/CT alone in oral cancer patients after neck irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Chia Cheng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Department of Communication Engineering, Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology, New Taipei City 22061, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Ming Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Li-Jen Liao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan
- Medical Engineering Office, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Hsi Hsieh
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Wei Shueng
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
| | - Po-Wen Cheng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
| | - Wu-Chia Lo
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 22060, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bhattacharya K, Mahajan A, Vaish R, Rane S, Shukla S, D'Cruz AK. Imaging of Neck Nodes in Head and Neck Cancers - a Comprehensive Update. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:429-445. [PMID: 37061456 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Cervical lymph node metastases from head and neck squamous cell cancers significantly reduce disease-free survival and worsen overall prognosis and, hence, deserve more aggressive management and follow-up. As per the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, extranodal extension, especially in human papillomavirus-negative cancers, has been incorporated in staging as it is important in deciding management and significantly impacts the outcome of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Lymph node imaging with various radiological modalities, including ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, has been widely used, not only to demonstrate nodal involvement but also for guided histopathological evaluation and therapeutic intervention. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, together with positron emission tomography, are used widely for the follow-up of treated patients. Finally, there is an emerging role for artificial intelligence in neck node imaging that has shown promising results, increasing the accuracy of detection of nodal involvement, especially normal-appearing nodes. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the diagnosis and management of involved neck nodes with a focus on sentinel node anatomy, pathogenesis, imaging correlates (including radiogenomics and artificial intelligence) and the role of image-guided interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bhattacharya
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - A Mahajan
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | - R Vaish
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - S Rane
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - S Shukla
- Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - A K D'Cruz
- Apollo Hospitals, India; Union International Cancer Control (UICC), Geneva, Switzerland; Foundation of Head Neck Oncology, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mohamad I, Glaun MDE, Prabhash K, Busheri A, Lai SY, Noronha V, Hosni A. Current Treatment Strategies and Risk Stratification for Oral Carcinoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e389810. [PMID: 37200591 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_389810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) involves a multidisciplinary team approach. Surgery is ideally the primary treatment option for nonmetastatic OSCC, and less invasive curative surgical approaches are preferred in early-stage disease to minimize surgical-related morbidity. For patients at high risk of recurrence, adjuvant treatment using radiation therapy or chemoradiation is often used. Systemic therapy may also be used in the neoadjuvant setting (for advanced-stage disease with the intent of mandibular preservation) or in the palliative setting (for nonsalvageable locoregional recurrence and/or distant metastases). Patient involvement in treatment decision is the key for patient-driven management, particularly in clinical situation with poor prognosis, for example, early postoperative recurrence before planned adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issa Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Mica D E Glaun
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ahmed Busheri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kuwait Cancer Control Center, Kuwait
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vanita Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ali Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sakai M, Nishimura B, Hiyama T, Kuno H, Shinozaki T, Sakamoto N, Nakajima T. Imaging of diffuse fibroepithelial polyps on surgical free flap in oral cancer patients: two case reports. Neuroradiology 2023; 65:815-818. [PMID: 36622386 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-03112-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Fibroepithelial polyp (FEP) is a common benign tumor occurring in the skin and genitourinary tract, and there are no reports of multiple FEPs occurring on the myocutaneous flap. We report two cases of FEPs occurring diffusely on the skin tissue of the free anterolateral thigh flap after surgical reconstruction for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clinically, multiple papillary nodules on the myocutaneous flap gradually increased. CT and MRI showed multiple papillary nodules on an enhanced layer covering the entire myocutaneous flap. PET/CT showed high uptake. One case was diagnosed with FEPs by surgery, the other by biopsy. The tumor-limited localization on the myocutaneous flap, characteristic morphology showing multiple papillary projection with an enhanced layer, and MRI signal showing patchy mild elevation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value may help in differential diagnosis from tumor recurrence or secondary carcinoma of the myocutaneous flap on diagnostic imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masafumi Sakai
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Amakubo 2-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
| | - Bungo Nishimura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasama, Japan
| | - Takashi Hiyama
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kuno
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takeshi Shinozaki
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Noriaki Sakamoto
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Takahito Nakajima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Amakubo 2-1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zander DA, Gursahaney DL, Oliver C, Callen AL, Potigailo VL. CT and MR Imaging Appearance of the Pedicled Submandibular Gland Flap: A Potential Imaging Pitfall in the Posttreatment Head and Neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023; 44:481-485. [PMID: 36927762 PMCID: PMC10084900 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Pedicled locoregional submandibular gland reconstruction flaps are increasingly used in oncologic head and neck surgery and have unique imaging characteristics that can mimic locally recurrent tumor. In this clinical report, 23 posttreatment imaging studies were evaluated in 19 patients who had undergone submandibular gland flap reconstructions after resection of a primary head and neck tumor. Submandibular gland flaps were most commonly mobilized into the parapharyngeal space or parotid bed, with others located inferior to the mandibular body and within marginal mandibulectomy defects. The original shape of the gland was typically not preserved. Identifying the submandibular gland hilum, vascular pedicle, glandular texture, and absence of submandibular gland in the orthotopic location was most useful in recognizing a flap. The interpreting radiologist must be familiar with the unique submandibular gland flap imaging characteristics to accurately differentiate normal postoperative appearance and recurrent tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Zander
- From the Departments of Radiology (D.A.Z., D.L.G., A.L.C., V.L.P.)
| | - D L Gursahaney
- From the Departments of Radiology (D.A.Z., D.L.G., A.L.C., V.L.P.)
| | - C Oliver
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (C.O.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - A L Callen
- From the Departments of Radiology (D.A.Z., D.L.G., A.L.C., V.L.P.)
| | - V L Potigailo
- From the Departments of Radiology (D.A.Z., D.L.G., A.L.C., V.L.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cheng PC, Chang CM, Liao LJ, Hsieh CH, Shueng PW, Cheng PW, Lo WC. Ultrasound examination supporting CT or MRI in the evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy in patients with irradiation-treated head and neck cancer. Open Med (Wars) 2023; 18:20230682. [PMID: 37069937 PMCID: PMC10105548 DOI: 10.1515/med-2023-0682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In this study, we determined the diagnostic performance of adding ultrasound (US) with/without fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating neck lymphadenopathy (LAP) in patients with head and neck cancer treated with irradiation. We included 269 patients who had neck LAP after radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) resulting from cancers of the head and neck region between October 2008 and September 2018. The diagnostic methods consisted of the following: 1) CT/MRI alone, 2) CT/MRI combined with a post-RT US predictive model, and 3) CT/MRI combined with US + FNAC. We compared their diagnostic performance using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In total, 141 (52%) malignant and 128 (48%) benign LAPs were observed. Regarding the diagnostic accuracy, the area under the ROC curves was highest for the combined CT/MRI and US + FNAC (0.965), followed by the combined CT/MRI and post-RT US predictive model (0.906) and CT/MRI alone (0.836). Our data suggest that the addition of a US examination to CT/MRI resulted in higher diagnostic performance than CT/MRI alone in terms of diagnosing recurrent or persistent nodal disease during the evaluation of LAP in patients with irradiation-treated head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Chia Cheng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
- Department of Communication Engineering, Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology, New Taipei City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
| | - Chih-Ming Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
| | - Li-Jen Liao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
- Medical Engineering Office, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
| | - Chen-Hsi Hsieh
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
| | - Pei-Wei Shueng
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
| | - Po-Wen Cheng
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
| | - Wu-Chia Lo
- Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance and Research Study Group, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, No. 21, Sec. 2, Nanya S. Rd., Banqiao Dist., New Taipei City 220, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
García-Curdi F, Lois-Ortega Y, Muniesa-Del Campo A, McGee-Laso A, Sebastián-Cortés JM, Vallés-Varela H, Lambea-Sorrosal JJ. Correlation between PET-CT and ct in the staging after the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 88 Suppl 4:S143-S151. [PMID: 34933818 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to find out if a single imaging test is enough to follow-up on an oncological post-treatment patient. In such a case, we would know which was more valuable after comparing the two, by CT or PET-CT. METHODS Between January 2012 and July 2018, we collected data from all patients with previous medical history who were treated with a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in our hospital, through surgery or by using an organ preservation protocol which we had done. Patients were required to have a CT and a PET-CT performed in a maximum period of 30 days between techniques. We compared the post post-treatment stage given to each case by using only the physical examination (only the CT and the PET-CT), with the ones given by the Tumor Board. After treatment, we analysed the similarity through Cramer's V statistic test. RESULTS We performed a comparative analysis, obtaining a correlation of 0.426 between the stages given by the Tumor Board and the one assigned based on physical examination, without imaging techniques. By only using the computed tomography as an imaging method the correlation was 0.565, whereas with only the use of positron emission computed technology, it was estimated at 0.858. When we compared the statistical association between stages using exclusively one of the two imaging techniques, the correlation was 0.451. CONCLUSION Independent of the modality, we have demonstrated that in patients who have received previous treatment, there was a higher correlation in the stages with respect to the diagnostic method conducted by the Tumor Board using PET-CT as the sole image. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ana Muniesa-Del Campo
- Universidad de Zaragoza, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Department of Animal Pathology, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Amaranta McGee-Laso
- Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Héctor Vallés-Varela
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baba A, Kurokawa R, Rawie E, Kurokawa M, Ota Y, Srinivasan A. Normalized Parameters of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI and DWI-ADC for Differentiation between Posttreatment Changes and Recurrence in Head and Neck Cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:1184-1189. [PMID: 35835592 PMCID: PMC9575415 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Differentiating recurrence from benign posttreatment changes has clinical importance in the imaging follow-up of head and neck cancer. This study aimed to investigate the utility of normalized dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and ADC for their differentiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included 51 patients with a history of head and neck cancer who underwent follow-up dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with DWI-ADC, of whom 25 had recurrences and 26 had benign posttreatment changes. Quantitative and semiquantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parameters and ADC of the ROI and reference region were analyzed. Normalized dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parameters and normalized DWI-ADC parameters were calculated by dividing the ROI by the reference region. RESULTS Normalized plasma volume, volume transfer constant between extravascular extracellular space and blood plasma per minute (K trans), area under the curve, and wash-in were significantly higher in patients with recurrence than in those with benign posttreatment change (P = .003 to <.001). The normalized mean ADC was significantly lower in patients with recurrence than in those with benign posttreatment change (P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the combination of normalized dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parameters with significance (normalized plasma volume, normalized extravascular extracellular space volume per unit tissue volume, normalized K trans, normalized area under the curve, and normalized wash-in) and normalized mean ADC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1). CONCLUSIONS Normalized dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging parameters, normalized mean ADC, and their combination were effective in differentiating recurrence and benign posttreatment changes in head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Baba
- From the Division of Neuroradiology (A.B., R.K., M.K., Y.O., A.S.), Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - R Kurokawa
- From the Division of Neuroradiology (A.B., R.K., M.K., Y.O., A.S.), Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - E Rawie
- Department of Radiology (E.R.), Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - M Kurokawa
- From the Division of Neuroradiology (A.B., R.K., M.K., Y.O., A.S.), Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Y Ota
- From the Division of Neuroradiology (A.B., R.K., M.K., Y.O., A.S.), Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - A Srinivasan
- From the Division of Neuroradiology (A.B., R.K., M.K., Y.O., A.S.), Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Iliadou V, Kakkos I, Karaiskos P, Kouloulias V, Platoni K, Zygogianni A, Matsopoulos GK. Early Prediction of Planning Adaptation Requirement Indication Due to Volumetric Alterations in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy: A Machine Learning Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153573. [PMID: 35892831 PMCID: PMC9331795 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: During RT cycles, the tumor response pattern could affect tumor coverage and may lead to organs at risk of overdose. As such, early prediction of significant volumetric changes could therefore reduce potential radiation-related adverse effects. Nevertheless, effective machine learning approaches based on the radiomic features of the clinically used CBCT images to determine the tumor volume variations due to RT not having been implemented so far. Methods: CBCT images from 40 HN cancer patients were collected weekly during RT treatment. From the obtained images, the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) and Parotid Glands (PG) regions of interest were utilized to calculate 104 delta-radiomics features. These features were fed on a feature selection and classification procedure for the early prediction of significant volumetric alterations. Results: The proposed framework was able to achieve 0.90 classification performance accuracy while detecting a small subset of discriminative characteristics from the 1st week of RT. The selected features were further analyzed regarding their effects on temporal changes in anatomy and tumor response modeling. Conclusion: The use of machine learning algorithms offers promising perspectives for fast and reliable early prediction of large volumetric deviations as a result of RT treatment, exploiting hidden patterns in the overall anatomical characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasiliki Iliadou
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 73 Athens, Greece; (I.K.); (G.K.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-21-0772-3577
| | - Ioannis Kakkos
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 73 Athens, Greece; (I.K.); (G.K.M.)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, 122 43 Athens, Greece
| | - Pantelis Karaiskos
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 27 Athens, Greece;
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, 124 62 Athens, Greece; (V.K.); (K.P.)
| | - Kalliopi Platoni
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, ATTIKON University Hospital, 124 62 Athens, Greece; (V.K.); (K.P.)
| | - Anna Zygogianni
- 1st Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, ARETAIEION University Hospital, 115 28 Athens, Greece;
| | - George K. Matsopoulos
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 73 Athens, Greece; (I.K.); (G.K.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rocha PHP, Reali RM, Decnop M, Souza SA, Teixeira LAB, Júnior AL, Sarpi MO, Cintra MB, Pinho MC, Garcia MRT. Adverse Radiation Therapy Effects in the Treatment of Head and Neck Tumors. Radiographics 2022; 42:806-821. [PMID: 35302867 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Whether used as a single modality or as part of a combined approach, radiation therapy (RT) plays an essential role in the treatment of several head and neck malignancies. Despite the improvement in radiation delivery techniques, normal structures in the vicinity of the target area remain susceptible to a wide range of adverse effects. Given their high incidence, some of these effects are referred to as expected postradiation changes (eg, mucositis, sialadenitis, and edema), while others are considered true complications, meaning they should not be expected and can even represent life-threatening conditions (eg, radionecrosis, fistulas, and radiation-induced neoplasms). Also, according to their timing of onset, these deleterious effects can be divided into four groups: acute (during RT), subacute (within weeks to months), delayed onset (within months to years), and very delayed onset (after several years).The authors provide a comprehensive review of the most important radiation-induced changes related to distinct head and neck sites, focusing on their typical cross-sectional imaging features and correlating them with the time elapsed after treatment. Radiologists should not only be familiar with these imaging findings but also actively seek essential clinical data at the time of interpretation (including knowledge of the RT dose and time, target site, and manifesting symptoms) to better recognize imaging findings, avoid pitfalls and help guide appropriate management. © RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro H P Rocha
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| | - Raphael M Reali
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| | - Marcos Decnop
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| | - Soraia A Souza
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| | - Lorine A B Teixeira
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| | - Ademar Lucas Júnior
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| | - Maíra O Sarpi
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| | - Murilo B Cintra
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| | - Marco C Pinho
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| | - Marcio R T Garcia
- From the Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Diagnósticos da América SA/DASA, São Paulo, Brazil (P.H.P.R., R.M.R., S.A.S., M.O.S., M.B.C., M.R.T.G.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (M.D.); Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (S.A.S., M.B.C.) and Radiation Therapy (L.A.B.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) do HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiation Therapy, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil (L.A.B.T.); Division of Head and Neck and Neuroradiology, Grupo São Camilo/ DASA, Maringá, Brazil (A.L.J.); Division of Head and Neck Radiology, Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/ HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil (M.O.S.); and Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (M.C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lv W, Xu H, Han X, Zhang H, Ma J, Rahmim A, Lu L. Context-Aware Saliency Guided Radiomics: Application to Prediction of Outcome and HPV-Status from Multi-Center PET/CT Images of Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071674. [PMID: 35406449 PMCID: PMC8996849 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This study investigated the ability of context-aware saliency-guided PET/CT radiomics in the prediction of outcome and HPV status for head and neck cancer. In total, 806 HNC patients (training vs. validation vs. external testing: 500 vs. 97 vs. 209) from 9 centers were collected from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Saliency-guided radiomics showed enhanced performance for both outcome and HPV-status predictions relative to conventional radiomics. The radiomics-predicted HPV status also showed complementary prognostic value. This multi-center study highlights the feasibility of saliency-guided PET/CT radiomics in outcome predictions of head and neck cancer, confirming that certain regions are more relevant to tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. Abstract Purpose: This multi-center study aims to investigate the prognostic value of context-aware saliency-guided radiomics in 18F-FDG PET/CT images of head and neck cancer (HNC). Methods: 806 HNC patients (training vs. validation vs. external testing: 500 vs. 97 vs. 209) from 9 centers were collected from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). There were 100/384 and 60/123 oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) status in training and testing cohorts, respectively. Six types of images were used for radiomics feature extraction and further model construction, namely (i) the original image (Origin), (ii) a context-aware saliency map (SalMap), (iii, iv) high- or low-saliency regions in the original image (highSal or lowSal), (v) a saliency-weighted image (SalxImg), and finally, (vi) a fused PET-CT image (FusedImg). Four outcomes were evaluated, i.e., recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS), respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis and logistic regression were adopted to construct radiomics scores for the prediction of outcome (Rad_Ocm) and HPV-status (Rad_HPV), respectively. Besides, the prognostic value of their integration (Rad_Ocm_HPV) was also investigated. Results: In the external testing cohort, compared with the Origin model, SalMap and SalxImg achieved the highest C-indices for RFS (0.621 vs. 0.559) and MFS (0.785 vs. 0.739) predictions, respectively, while FusedImg performed the best for both OS (0.685 vs. 0.659) and DFS (0.641 vs. 0.582) predictions. In the OPC HPV testing cohort, FusedImg showed higher AUC for HPV-status prediction compared with the Origin model (0.653 vs. 0.484). In the OPC testing cohort, compared with Rad_Ocm or Rad_HPV alone, Rad_Ocm_HPV performed the best for OS and DFS predictions with C-indices of 0.702 (p = 0.002) and 0.684 (p = 0.006), respectively. Conclusion: Saliency-guided radiomics showed enhanced performance for both outcome and HPV-status predictions relative to conventional radiomics. The radiomics-predicted HPV status also showed complementary prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbing Lv
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China; (W.L.); (H.X.); (X.H.); (J.M.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Technology, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou 510330, China
| | - Hui Xu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China; (W.L.); (H.X.); (X.H.); (J.M.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Technology, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou 510330, China
| | - Xu Han
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China; (W.L.); (H.X.); (X.H.); (J.M.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Technology, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou 510330, China
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China;
| | - Jianhua Ma
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China; (W.L.); (H.X.); (X.H.); (J.M.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Technology, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou 510330, China
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada;
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
- Department of Physics, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
| | - Lijun Lu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China; (W.L.); (H.X.); (X.H.); (J.M.)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Technology, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou 510515, China
- Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou 510330, China
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-020-62789116
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Baba A, Kurokawa R, Fukuda T, Kurokawa M, Tsuyumu M, Matsushima S, Ota Y, Yamauchi H, Ojiri H, Srinivasan A. Comprehensive radiological features of laryngeal sarcoidosis: cases series and systematic review. Neuroradiology 2022; 64:1239-1248. [PMID: 35246700 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-02922-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To comprehensively summarize the characteristic radiological findings of laryngeal sarcoidosis. METHODS We reviewed patients with laryngeal sarcoidosis who underwent computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and included 8 cases from 8 publications that were found through a systematic review and 6 cases from our institutions. Two board-certified radiologists reviewed and evaluated the radiological images. RESULTS Almost all cases exhibited supraglottic lesions 13/14 (92.9%) and most of them involved aryepiglottic folds (12/13, 92.3%), epiglottis (11/14, 78.6%), and arytenoid region (10/14, 71.4%). Most lesions were bilateral (12/14, 85.7%). All cases showed well-defined margins and a diffuse swelling appearance (14/14, 100%). Non-contrast CT revealed a low density (4/5, 80%). The contrast-enhanced CT showed a slight patchy enhancement predominantly at the margin of the lesion in most cases (12/13, 92.3%). In one case, T2-weighted images showed high signal intensity peripherally and low signal intensity centrally (1/1, 100%). Gadolinium-enhanced MRI showed moderate heterogeneous enhancement predominantly at the margin of the lesion (2/2, 100%). In one case, diffusion-weighted imaging showed intermediate signal intensity; the apparent diffusion coefficient value was 2.4 × 10-3 mm2/s. The larynx was the only region affected by sarcoidosis in 57.1% (8/14) of the cases. Involvement of the neck lymph nodes and distant organs was observed in 4/14 (28.6%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION We summarized the CT and MRI findings of patients with laryngeal sarcoidosis. Knowledge of these characteristics is expected to facilitate prompt diagnosis and appropriate management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Baba
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. .,Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
| | - Ryo Kurokawa
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Takeshi Fukuda
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Mariko Kurokawa
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Matsusato Tsuyumu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Satoshi Matsushima
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Ota
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Hideomi Yamauchi
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Hiroya Ojiri
- Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Ashok Srinivasan
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sheikhbahaei S, Subramaniam RM, Solnes LB. 2-Deoxy-2-[18F] Fluoro-d-Glucose PET/Computed Tomography. PET Clin 2022; 17:307-317. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
22
|
Patel L, Bridgham K, Ciriello J, Almardawi R, Leon J, Hostetter J, Yazbek S, Raghavan P. PET/MR Imaging in Evaluating Treatment Failure of Head and Neck Malignancies: A Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System-Based Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:435-441. [PMID: 35177543 PMCID: PMC8910793 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE PET/MR imaging is a relatively new hybrid technology that holds great promise for the evaluation of head and neck cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of simultaneous PET/MR imaging versus MR imaging in the evaluation of posttreatment head and neck malignancies, as determined by its ability to predict locoregional recurrence or progression after imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS The electronic medical records of patients who had posttreatment PET/MR imaging studies were reviewed, and after applying the exclusion criteria, we retrospectively included 46 studies. PET/MR imaging studies were independently reviewed by 2 neuroradiologists, who recorded scores based on the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (using CT/PET-CT criteria) for the diagnostic MR imaging sequences alone and the combined PET/MR imaging. Treatment failure was determined with either biopsy pathology or initiation of new treatment. Statistical analyses including univariate association, interobserver agreement, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed. RESULTS There was substantial interreader agreement among PET/MR imaging scores (κ = 0.634; 95% CI, 0.605-0.663). PET/MR imaging scores showed a strong association with treatment failure by univariate association analysis, with P < .001 for the primary site, neck lymph nodes, and combined sites. Receiver operating characteristic curves of PET/MR imaging scores versus treatment failure indicated statistically significant diagnostic accuracy (area under curve range, 0.864-0.987; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous PET/MR imaging has excellent discriminatory performance for treatment outcomes of head and neck malignancy when the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System is applied. PET/MR imaging could play an important role in surveillance imaging for head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L.D. Patel
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - K. Bridgham
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - J. Ciriello
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - R. Almardawi
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - J. Leon
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - J. Hostetter
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - S. Yazbek
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - P. Raghavan
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Baba A, Kurokawa R, Kurokawa M, Hassan O, Ota Y, Srinivasan A. ADC for Differentiation between Posttreatment Changes and Recurrence in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:442-447. [PMID: 35210272 PMCID: PMC8910821 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies reported that the ADC values of recurrent head and neck cancer lesions are lower than those of posttreatment changes, however, the utility of ADC to differentiate them has not been definitively summarized and established. PURPOSE Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic benefit of ADC calculated from diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating recurrent lesions from posttreatment changes in head and neck cancer. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE data bases were searched for studies. STUDY SELECTION The review identified 6 prospective studies with a total of 365 patients (402 lesions) who were eligible for the meta-analysis. DATA ANALYSIS Forest plots were used to assess the mean difference in ADC values. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q test and the I2 statistic. DATA SYNTHESIS Among included studies, the overall mean of ADC values of recurrent lesions was 1.03 × 10-3mm2/s and that of the posttreatment changes was 1.51 × 10-3mm2/s. The ADC value of recurrence was significantly less than that of posttreatment changes in head and neck cancer (pooled mean difference: -0.45; 95% CI, -0.59-0.32, P < .0001) with heterogeneity among studies. The threshold of ADC values between recurrent lesions and posttreatment changes was suggested to be 1.10 × 10-3mm2/s. LIMITATIONS Given the heterogeneity of the data of the study, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS The ADC values in recurrent head and neck cancers are lower than those of posttreatment changes, and the threshold of ADC values between them was suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Baba
- From the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - R. Kurokawa
- From the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - M. Kurokawa
- From the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - O. Hassan
- From the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Y. Ota
- From the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - A. Srinivasan
- From the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Imaging of Complications of Chemoradiation. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2021; 32:93-109. [PMID: 34809846 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Chemoradiation for head and neck cancer is associated with a variety of early and late complications. Toxicities may affect the aero-digestive tract (mucositis, salivary gland injury), regional osseous and cartilaginous structures (osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and chondronecrosis), vasculature (progressive radiation vasculopathy and carotid blow out syndromes), and neural structures (optic neuritis, myelitis, and brain injury). These may be difficult to distinguish from tumor recurrence on imaging, and may necessitate the use of advanced MRI and molecular imaging techniques to reach the correct diagnosis. Secondary radiation-induced malignancies include thyroid cancer and a variety of sarcomas that may manifest several years after treatment. Checkpoint inhibitors can cause a variety of adverse immune events, including autoimmune hypophysitis and encephalitis.
Collapse
|
25
|
Abdel Razek AAK, Saleh GA, Denever AT, Mukherji SK. Preimaging and Postimaging of Graft and Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2021; 30:121-133. [PMID: 34802575 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck reconstructive surgical techniques are complex; now the microvascular free tissue transfer is the most frequently used. The postreconstruction imaging interpretation is challenging due to the altered anatomy and flap variability. We aim to improve radiologists' knowledge with diverse methods of flap reconstruction for an accurate appreciation of their expected cross-sectional imaging appearance and early detection of tumor recurrence and other complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gehad A Saleh
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mansoura University, Elgomhoria Street, Mansoura 35512, Egypt
| | - Adel T Denever
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Mansoura University, Elgomhoria Street, Mansoura 35512, Egypt
| | - Suresh K Mukherji
- Marian University, Head and Neck Radiology, ProScan Imaging, Carmel, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Posttreatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging Surveillance of Head and Neck Cancers. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2021; 30:109-120. [PMID: 34802574 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Treatment strategies and recommended surveillance imaging differ for head and neck cancers depending on subsite and neoplasm type, and pose confusion for referring physicians and interpreting radiologists. The superior soft tissue resolution offered by magnetic resonance imaging is most useful in the surveillance of cancers with high propensities for intraorbital, intracranial, or perineural disease spread, which most commonly include those arising from the sinonasal cavities, nasopharynx, orbits, salivary glands, and the skin. This article discusses recommended surveillance protocoling and reviews treatment approaches, common posttreatment changes, and pearls for identifying disease recurrence in a subsite-based approach.
Collapse
|
27
|
Gehani A, Sen S, Chatterjee S, Mukhopadhyay S. Imaging Features of Postradiotherapy Changes in Head and Neck Cancers. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2021; 31:661-669. [PMID: 34790312 PMCID: PMC8590562 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy is the mainstay in the treatment of head and neck cancers, in addition to surgery and chemotherapy. Expected radiotherapy changes evolving over time may be confused with recurrent tumor. Conversely, even residual or recurrent tumor in the setting of postradiotherapy changes may be difficult to identify clinically or even by radiological imaging. Therefore, it is important to be familiar with the temporal evolution of these changes. The purpose of this pictorial essay is thus to illustrate distinctly the expected radiotherapy changes and radiotherapy-related complications in the head and neck region and to differentiate them from tumor recurrence on routine cross-sectional imaging techniques (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisha Gehani
- Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center, Rajarhat, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Saugata Sen
- Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center, Rajarhat, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sanjoy Chatterjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Rajarhat, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sumit Mukhopadhyay
- Department of Radiology, Tata Medical Center, Rajarhat, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
House AE, Zebolsky AL, Jacobs J, Likhterov I, Behr S, Glastonbury C, Seth R, Heaton C, Knott PD. Surveillance Imaging Following Head and Neck Cancer Treatment and Microvascular Reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2021; 131:2713-2718. [PMID: 34156723 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To assess the accuracy and utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting head and neck cancer (HNC) recurrence after microvascular reconstructive surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. METHODS Analysis of HNC patients who underwent microvascular reconstruction at a single, tertiary academic center following ablative surgery from 1998 to 2015. Forty-six patients aged 61.4 ± 15.8 years with both PET/CT and MRI examinations were identified. Two radiologists were blinded and interpreted each imaging study. Recurrence certainty scores were determined via continuous (0-100) and Likert ("Likely" to "Unlikely") scales, with larger values indicating a higher likelihood of recurrence. Pathologic confirmation of recurrence was confirmed in 23 patients (50%). RESULTS Among those with primary site recurrences, mean recurrence certainty was significantly higher with PET/CT versus MRI on the continuous scale (63.9 vs. 44.4, P = .006). A receiver operating characteristic analysis for predicting primary site recurrence demonstrated a significantly larger area under the curve of 0.79 for PET/CT compared to 0.64 for MRI (P = .044). Categorization of "Likely" primary site recurrence on PET/CT, versus MRI, had higher sensitivity (0.63 vs. 0.40), but lower specificity (0.90 vs. 1.0). MRI demonstrated higher sensitivity (1.0 vs. 0.78) at detecting regional site recurrences. CONCLUSION PET/CT demonstrates greater sensitivity than MRI as a surveillance tool for primary site recurrence following microvascular reconstruction where clinical evaluation is hindered by anatomical distortion. Therefore, PET/CT should be pursued as first-line imaging, with MRI utilized for confirmation of positive imaging findings at the primary site. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian E House
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Aaron L Zebolsky
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Joanna Jacobs
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Ilya Likhterov
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Spencer Behr
- San Francisco Medical Center, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Christine Glastonbury
- San Francisco Medical Center, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Rahul Seth
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Chase Heaton
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Philip Daniel Knott
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Albano D, Benenati M, Bruno A, Bruno F, Calandri M, Caruso D, Cozzi D, De Robertis R, Gentili F, Grazzini I, Micci G, Palmisano A, Pessina C, Scalise P, Vernuccio F, Barile A, Miele V, Grassi R, Messina C. Imaging side effects and complications of chemotherapy and radiation therapy: a pictorial review from head to toe. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:76. [PMID: 34114094 PMCID: PMC8192650 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01017-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Newer biologic drugs and immunomodulatory agents, as well as more tolerated and effective radiation therapy schemes, have reduced treatment toxicity in oncology patients. However, although imaging assessment of tumor response is adapting to atypical responses like tumor flare, expected changes and complications of chemo/radiotherapy are still routinely encountered in post-treatment imaging examinations. Radiologists must be aware of old and newer therapeutic options and related side effects or complications to avoid a misinterpretation of imaging findings. Further, advancements in oncology research have increased life expectancy of patients as well as the frequency of long-term therapy-related side effects that once could not be observed. This pictorial will help radiologists tasked to detect therapy-related complications and to differentiate expected changes of normal tissues from tumor relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. .,Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy. .,Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Massimo Benenati
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia, Oncologia ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Bruno
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, Maggiore Hospital "C. A. Pizzardi", 40133, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Marco Calandri
- Radiology Unit, A.O.U. San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano, Department of Oncology, University of Torino, 10043, Turin, Italy
| | - Damiano Caruso
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Diletta Cozzi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50123, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo De Robertis
- U.O.C. Radiologia BT, Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Gentili
- Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Irene Grazzini
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Micci
- Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.,Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Palmisano
- Experimental Imaging Centre, Radiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlotta Pessina
- Department of Radiology, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paola Scalise
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50123, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Retrospective Evaluation of NI-RADS for Detecting Postsurgical Recurrence of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma on Surveillance CT or MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:198-206. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.24209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
31
|
Hsu D, Rath TJ, Branstetter BF, Anzai Y, Phillips CD, Juliano AF, Mosier KM, Bazylewicz MP, Poliashenko SM, Kulzer MH, Rhyner PA, Risk B, Wiggins RH, Aiken AH. Interrater Reliability of NI-RADS on Posttreatment PET/Contrast-enhanced CT Scans in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2021; 3:e200131. [PMID: 34018845 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2021200131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the interrater reliability among radiologists examining posttreatment head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) fluorodeoxyglucose PET/contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans using Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, images in 80 patients with HNSCC who underwent posttreatment surveillance PET/CECT and immediate prior comparison CECT or PET/CECT (from June 2014 to July 2016) were uploaded to the American College of Radiology's cloud-based website, Cortex. Eight radiologists from seven institutions with variable NI-RADS experience independently evaluated each case and assigned an appropriate prose description and NI-RADS category for the primary site and the neck site. Five of these individuals were experienced readers (> 5 years of experience), and three were novices (< 5 years of experience). In total, 640 lexicon-based and NI-RADS categories were assigned to lesions among the 80 included patients by the eight radiologists. Light generalization of Cohen κ for interrater reliability was performed. Results Of the 80 included patients (mean age, 63 years ± 10 [standard deviation]), there were 58 men (73%); 60 patients had stage IV HNSCC (75%), and the most common tumor location was oropharynx (n = 32; 40%). Light κ for lexicon was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.36) at the primary site and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.37) at the neck site. Light κ for NI-RADS category was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.63) at the primary site and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.69) at the neck site. Percent agreement between lexicon and correlative NI-RADS category was 84.4% (540 of 640) at the primary site and 92.6% (593 of 640) at the neck site. There was no significant difference in interobserver agreement among the experienced versus novice raters. Conclusion Moderate agreement was achieved among eight radiologists using NI-RADS at posttreatment HNSCC surveillance imaging. Keywords: CT, PET/CT, Head/Neck, Neck, Neoplasms-Primary, Observer Performance Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Hsu
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Tanya J Rath
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Barton F Branstetter
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Yoshimi Anzai
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - C Douglas Phillips
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Amy F Juliano
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Kristine M Mosier
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Michael P Bazylewicz
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Stan M Poliashenko
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Matthew H Kulzer
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Patricia A Rhyner
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Benjamin Risk
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Richard H Wiggins
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| | - Ashley H Aiken
- From the Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Room BG03, Atlanta, GA 30322 (D.H., A.H.A.); Department of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (T.J.R.); Departments of Radiology and Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (B.F.B.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Y.A., R.H.W.); Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY (C.D.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.F.J.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind (K.M.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt (M.P.B.); Radiology Imaging Associates, Englewood, Colo (S.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (M.H.K.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Ga (P.A.R.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga (B.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Agrawal A, Prakash A, Choudhury S, Manikandan MV, Jain Y, Purandare N, Puranik A, Shah S, Rangarajan V. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Postsurgical Setting in Head and Neck Cancers - A Pictorial Essay. Indian J Nucl Med 2021; 36:195-200. [PMID: 34385794 PMCID: PMC8320815 DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_204_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
This pictorial essay depicts normal appearances, complications, and findings of residual and/or recurrent disease on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F- FDG PET/CT) studies in the postsurgical setting. Reading and reporting 18F- FDG PET/CT in the postoperative scenario is demanding due to the multiple false positives seen during this period. This article which contains two parts will familiarize the readers with the normal appearance and pitfalls seen in 18F- FDG PET/CT studies during the postoperative period so as to avoid misinterpretations. This pictorial will discuss 18F- FDG PET/CT in the postoperative scenario in head and neck cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archi Agrawal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anjali Prakash
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sayak Choudhury
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - M. V. Manikandan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Yash Jain
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nilendu Purandare
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ameya Puranik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sneha Shah
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Venkatesh Rangarajan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sandler ML, Griffin M, Xing MH, Ansari E, Khorsandi AS, Urken ML. Postoperative Imaging Appearance of Iliac Crest Free Flaps Used for Palatomaxillary Reconstructions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:753-758. [PMID: 33632734 PMCID: PMC8040998 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The osteomyocutaneous iliac crest free flap is a reconstructive option for segmental mandibular or complex palatomaxillary defects. Familiarity with the radiographic appearance of free flaps such as the iliac crest is necessary for the postoperative evaluation of patients after mandibular, maxillary, or palatal reconstructions because it allows radiologists to properly monitor and interpret the appearance of the flap over time. This study presents a retrospective review of 5 patients who underwent palatomaxillary reconstruction with an iliac crest free flap at our institution. The imaging appearances of the 5 patients were analyzed to determine the key radiographic characteristics of a healthy and successful iliac crest free flap. Radiographic fluency with the imaging appearance of the iliac crest free flap, as well as the new anatomy of the region in the postoperative period, will allow for better interpretation of the flap appearance on imaging and will prevent false identification of tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Sandler
- From the Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer (THANC) Foundation (M.L.S., M.G., M.H.X., M.L.U.), New York, New York
| | - M Griffin
- From the Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer (THANC) Foundation (M.L.S., M.G., M.H.X., M.L.U.), New York, New York
| | - M H Xing
- From the Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer (THANC) Foundation (M.L.S., M.G., M.H.X., M.L.U.), New York, New York
| | - E Ansari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (E.A., M.L.U.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, New York
| | - A S Khorsandi
- Department of Radiology (A.S.K.), NY Eye & Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - M L Urken
- From the Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer (THANC) Foundation (M.L.S., M.G., M.H.X., M.L.U.), New York, New York
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (E.A., M.L.U.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bunch PM, Hughes RT, White EP, Sachs JR, Frizzell BA, Lack CM. The Pharyngolaryngeal Venous Plexus: A Potential Pitfall in Surveillance Imaging of the Neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:938-944. [PMID: 33664114 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Among patients undergoing serial neck CTs, we have observed variability in the appearance of the pharyngolaryngeal venous plexus, which comprises the postcricoid and posterior pharyngeal venous plexuses. We hypothesize changes in plexus appearance from therapeutic neck irradiation. The purposes of this study are to describe the CT appearance of the pharyngolaryngeal venous plexus among 2 groups undergoing serial neck CTs-patients with radiation therapy-treated laryngeal cancer and patients with medically treated lymphoma-and to assess for changes in plexus appearance attributable to radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS For this retrospective study of 98 patients (49 in each group), 448 contrast-enhanced neck CTs (222 laryngeal cancer; 226 lymphoma) were assessed. When visible, the plexus anteroposterior diameter was measured, and morphology was categorized. RESULTS At least 1 plexus component was identified in 36/49 patients with laryngeal cancer and 37/49 patients with lymphoma. There were no statistically significant differences in plexus visibility between the 2 groups. Median anteroposterior diameter was 2.1 mm for the postcricoid venous plexus and 1.6 mm for the posterior pharyngeal venous plexus. The most common morphology was "bilobed" for the postcricoid venous plexus and "linear" for the posterior pharyngeal venous plexus. The pharyngolaryngeal venous plexus and its components were commonly identifiable only on follow-up imaging. CONCLUSIONS Head and neck radiologists should be familiar with the typical location and variable appearance of the pharyngolaryngeal plexus components so as not to mistake them for neoplasm. Observed variability in plexus appearance is not attributable to radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M Bunch
- From the Department of Radiology (P.M.B., E.P.W., J.R.S., C.M.L.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - R T Hughes
- Department of Radiation Oncology (R.T.H., B.A.F.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - E P White
- From the Department of Radiology (P.M.B., E.P.W., J.R.S., C.M.L.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - J R Sachs
- From the Department of Radiology (P.M.B., E.P.W., J.R.S., C.M.L.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - B A Frizzell
- Department of Radiation Oncology (R.T.H., B.A.F.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - C M Lack
- From the Department of Radiology (P.M.B., E.P.W., J.R.S., C.M.L.), Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rao D, Behzadi F, Le RT, Dagan R, Fiester P. Radiation Induced Mucositis: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020; 50:899-904. [PMID: 33279307 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Radiation induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is a common and debilitating complication of radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. RIOM can lead to oral pain, dysphagia, and reduced oral intake, which can be severe enough to necessitate placement of a feeding tube or utilization of total parenteral nutrition. When severe, RIOM can cause premature termination of radiation therapy and can alter treatment plans leading to suboptimal treatment doses. While patient reporting of RIOM symptoms has been the gold standard of documenting RIOM progression, little has been described in the radiology literature concerning the typical imaging findings of RIOM. Herein, we review the pathophysiology and clinical presentation that underlies the development of RIOM with illustrative cases to highlight the relevant imaging findings related to RIOM for the practicing radiologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Rao
- Department of Radiology, UF Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Fardad Behzadi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Aventura Hospital and Medical Center, Aventura, FL
| | - Rebecca T Le
- Department of Radiology, UF Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL; Department of Radiology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY.
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UF Proton Center, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Peter Fiester
- Department of Radiology, UF Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hudecki A, Wolany W, Likus W, Markowski J, Wilk R, Kolano-Burian A, Łuczak K, Zorychta M, Kawecki M, Łos MJ. Orbital reconstruction - applied materials, therapeutic agents and clinical problems of restoration of defects. Eur J Pharmacol 2020; 892:173766. [PMID: 33249074 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Reconstruction of large cavities in the skull and facial regions is important not only to restore health but also for the correction of facial distortions. Every visible deformity in the facial region of the patient affects their mental wellness and perception by society, entailing both, deterioration of health, but also a decrease in the performance in society, which translates into its productivity. With the progressive degradation of the natural environment, cancer, in the coming years, will be on the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. The review focuses on two main aspects: (i) the causes of injuries leading to the necessity of removal of orbital cavities occupied by the tumor and then their reconstruction, with the focus on the anatomical structure of the orbital cavity, (ii) the materials used to reconstruct the orbital cavities and analyze their advantages and disadvantages. The manuscript also underlines the not yet fully met challenges in the area of facial- and craniofacial reconstruction in people affected by cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Hudecki
- Łukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals, Gliwice, Poland
| | | | - Wirginia Likus
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
| | - Jarosław Markowski
- Department of Laryngology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
| | - Renata Wilk
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Marek Kawecki
- University of Bielsko-Biala, Faculty of Heath Science, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
| | - Marek J Łos
- Biotechnology Centre, Silesian University of Technology, Poland; and Linkocare Life Sciences AB, Linkoping, Gliwice, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Muhanna N, Eu D, Chan HH, Daly M, Fricke IB, Douglas CM, Townson JL, Zheng J, Allen C, Jaffray DA, Irish JC. Assessment of a liposomal CT/optical contrast agent for image-guided head and neck surgery. NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2020; 32:102327. [PMID: 33220507 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
This study evaluates a long-acting liposomal fluorescence / CT dual-modality contrast agent (CF800) in head and neck cancer to enhance intraoperative tumor demarcation with fluorescence imaging and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). CF800 was administered to 12 buccal cancer-bearing rabbits. Imaging was acquired at regular time points to quantify time-dependent contrast enhancement. Surgery was performed 5-7 days after, with intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy and CBCT, followed by histological and ex-vivo fluorescence assessment. Tumor enhancement on CT was significant at 24, 96 and 120 hours. Volumetric analysis of tumor segmentation showed high correlation between CBCT and micro-CT. Fluorescence signal was apparent in both ex-vivo and in-vivo imaging. Histological correlation showed [100%] specificity for primary tumor. Sensitivity and specificity of CF800 in detecting nodal involvement require further investigation.CF800 is long acting and has dual function for CT and fluorescence contrast, making it an excellent candidate for image-guided surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidal Muhanna
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Donovan Eu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Harley Hl Chan
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Daly
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Inga B Fricke
- University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Catriona M Douglas
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jason L Townson
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jinzi Zheng
- University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christine Allen
- University of Toronto, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David A Jaffray
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; University of Toronto, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Medical Biophysics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Irish
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada..
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Troeltzsch D, Niehues SM, Fluegge T, Neckel N, Heiland M, Hamm B, Shnayien S. The diagnostic performance of perfusion CT in the detection of local tumor recurrence in head and neck cancer. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2020; 76:171-177. [PMID: 32925013 DOI: 10.3233/ch-209209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detecting local tumor recurrence from post-treatment changes in head and neck cancer (HNC) remains a challenge. Based on the hypothesis that post-therapeutically altered tissue is bradytroph, lower perfusion values are expected in perfusion CT (PCT) while higher perfusion values are expected in recurrent malignant tissue. OBJECTIVES This prospective study investigates PCT for post-treatment recurrent HNC detection with a maximum slope algorithm. METHODS A total of 80 patients who received PCT of the head and neck for post-therapy follow-up, of which 63 had no tumor recurrence and 17 presented a histopathologically confirmed recurrence were examined. Regions of interest were placed in the location of the initial tumor, in reference ipsilateral nuchal muscle tissue and the corresponding internal carotid artery. Perfusion was calculated using a single-input maximum slope algorithm. RESULTS With PCT, recurrent HNC can be differentiated from post-treatment tissue (p < 0.05). It further allows delineating recurrent tumor tissue from benign nuchal tissue of reference (p < 0.05). PCT data of patients with and without recurrent HNC are comparable as perfusion values of reference tissues in patients with and without HNC do not differ (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS PCT in combination with a commercially available maximum slope algorithm offers radiologists a reliable imaging tool to detect recurrent head and neck cancer within post-therapeutically altered tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Troeltzsch
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Tabea Fluegge
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Norbert Neckel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Hamm
- Department of Radiology Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Seyd Shnayien
- Department of Radiology Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Quantitative ultrasound delta-radiomics during radiotherapy for monitoring treatment responses in head and neck malignancies. Future Sci OA 2020; 6:FSO624. [PMID: 33235811 PMCID: PMC7668124 DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2020-0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: We investigated quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in patients with node-positive head and neck malignancies for monitoring responses to radical radiotherapy (RT). Materials & methods: QUS spectral and texture parameters were acquired from metastatic lymph nodes 24 h, 1 and 4 weeks after starting RT. K-nearest neighbor and naive-Bayes machine-learning classifiers were used to build prediction models for each time point. Response was detected after 3 months of RT, and patients were classified into complete and partial responders. Results: Single-feature naive-Bayes classification performed best with a prediction accuracy of 80, 86 and 85% at 24 h, week 1 and 4, respectively. Conclusion: QUS-radiomics can predict RT response at 3 months as early as 24 h with reasonable accuracy, which further improves into 1 week of treatment. Patients with head and neck cancer are often treated with radiation, which usually spans over 6–7 weeks. The response is usually measured 3 months after treatment completion. In this study, we had performed ultrasound scans from the patient’s neck node during radiation treatment (after 24 h, 1 and 4 weeks). Artificial intelligence was used to interpret the ultrasound imaging and predict the response to radiation at the end of 3 months. The scans obtained after the first week were able to predict the treatment response with reasonable accuracy (86%).
Collapse
|
40
|
Magnetic resonance imaging differentiates locoregional flaps from free flaps after reconstructive surgical treatment of tongue cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2020; 131:356-363. [PMID: 32855103 DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of reconstruction with locoregional flaps (LRFs) with free flaps (FFs) after surgical treatment for tongue cancer. STUDY DESIGN In total, 115 cases of postoperative tongue carcinoma (67 cases of LRF surgery and 48 cases of FF surgery) were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had undergone nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI at 0-4, 5-12, and 13-48 months after surgery. Signal intensity, margins, maximal size, contrast enhancement, change in the hyoglossus and mylohyoid muscles, recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS Significant differences were found between LRF and FF for signal intensity (P < .001) in all 3 periods, with LRF mostly isointense with muscle on T1-weighted images (T1WIs) and FF producing mixed hyperintensity with muscular striations in all cases in T1WIs and T2-weighted images (T2 WIs). Margin definition was similar between groups in the early period, but sharp margins were more common in FF after 4 months (P ≤ .018). LRF was significantly smaller than FF in all periods (P ≤ .017). Both mylohyoid and hyoglossus enlargements were common in the early period in both groups, but all cases became atrophic later. CONCLUSIONS MRI can differentiate LRFs from FFs in a variety of parameters after flap reconstructive surgery for tongue cancer.
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
In academic centers, PET/MR has taken the road to clinical nuclear medicine in the past 6 years since the last review on its applications in head and neck cancer patients in this journal. Meanwhile, older sequential PET + MR machines have largely vanished from clinical sites, being replaced by integrated simultaneous PET/MR scanners. Evidence from several studies suggests that PET/MR overall performs equally well as PET/CT in the staging and restaging of head and neck cancer and in radiation therapy planning. PET/MR appears to offer advantages in the characterization and prognostication of head and neck malignancies through multiparametric imaging, which demands an exact preparation and validation of imaging modalities, however. The majority of available clinical PET/MR studies today covers FDG imaging of squamous cell carcinoma arising from a broad spectrum of locations in the upper aerodigestive tract. In the future, specific PET/MR studies are desired that address specific histopathological tumor entities, nonepithelial malignancies, such as major salivary gland tumors, squamous cell carcinomas arising in specific locations, and malignancies imaged with non-FDG radiotracers. With the advent of digital PET/CT scanners, PET/MR is expected to partake in future technical developments, such as novel iterative reconstruction techniques and deviceless motion correction for respiration and gross movement in the head and neck region. Owing to the still comparably high costs of PET/MR scanners and facility requirements on the one hand, and the concentration of multidisciplinary head and neck cancer treatment mainly at academic centers on the other hand, a more widespread use of this imaging modality outside major hospitals is currently limited.
Collapse
|
42
|
Gillespie J. Imaging of the post-treatment neck. Clin Radiol 2020; 75:794.e7-794.e17. [PMID: 32690240 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Post-treatment imaging of the neck is complex. It is important to have an understanding of the expected treatment related appearances as well as the possible complications. Common findings after radiation therapy include generalised soft-tissue oedema and thickening of the skin and platysma muscle. There are a number of complications of radiation that may be seen on imaging, including osteoradionecrosis, chondronecrosis, and accelerated atherosclerosis. Surgical procedures are variable depending on the primary tumour site and extent. The use of flap reconstructions can further complicate the imaging appearances. Any new nodule of enhancement or bone/cartilage erosion should raise concern for tumour recurrence. It is also important to assess for nodal recurrence. A standardised approach to reporting may help to increase accuracy and guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Gillespie
- Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4029, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Level 6, Oral Health Centre, Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006 Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ng SP, Cardenas CE, Elhalawani H, Pollard C, Elgohari B, Fang P, Meheissen M, Guha-Thakurta N, Bahig H, Johnson JM, Kamal M, Garden AS, Reddy JP, Su SY, Ferrarotto R, Frank SJ, Brandon Gunn G, Moreno AC, Rosenthal DI, Fuller CD, Phan J. Comparison of tumor delineation using dual energy computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer re-irradiation cases. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2020; 14:1-5. [PMID: 33458306 PMCID: PMC7807720 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
GTVs on the 60 kV and 140 kV from DECT, and the T1c and T2 from MRI were compared. Delineation was the most consistent using T1c (no interobserver difference in DSC). T1c MRI provided higher interobserver agreement for skull base tumors. 60 kV DECT provided higher interobserver agreement for non-skull base tumors.
In treatment planning, multiple imaging modalities can be employed to improve the accuracy of tumor delineation but this can be costly. This study aimed to compare the interobserver consistency of using dual energy computed tomography (DECT) versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for delineating tumors in the head and neck cancer (HNC) re-irradiation scenario. Twenty-three patients with recurrent HNC and had planning DECT and MRI were identified. Contoured tumor volumes by seven radiation oncologists were compared. Overall, T1c MRI performed the best with median DSC of 0.58 (0–0.91) for T1c. T1c MRI provided higher interobserver agreement for skull base sites and 60 kV DECT provided higher interobserver agreement for non-skull base sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Courtney Pollard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Baher Elgohari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Penny Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mohamed Meheissen
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Nandita Guha-Thakurta
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jason M Johnson
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mona Kamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jay P Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy C Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Garber D, Rotsides J, Abu-Ghanem S, Bandler I, Smith A, Oyfe I, Swahn DM, Hagiwara M, Amin M, Johnson AM. Decreased Tongue Volume Post Radiation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2020; 129:741-747. [PMID: 32126808 DOI: 10.1177/0003489420911668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate volume changes within the tongue post chemoradiation therapy (CRT). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Academic Medical Center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Subjects included 19 patients that received CRT as the primary treatment for tonsillar or hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma. Tongue volumes were calculated by three raters from thin slice computed tomography images collected before treatment and up to 29 months post-CRT. Body mass index (BMI) was also collected at each time point. RESULTS Inter-rater reliability was high with an ICC of 0.849 (95% CI = 0.773, 0.905). Linear mixed effects modeling showed a mean decrease of 0.45 cm3 (standard error of the mean [SEM] = 0.11) in tongue volume per month post-CRT (P < .001). However, the addition of BMI to the model was significant (χ2 (4) = 25.0, P < .001), indicating that BMI was a strong predictor of tongue volume, with a mean decrease of 1.75 cm3 (SEM = 0.49) in tongue volume per unit decrease in BMI (P < .001) and reducing the post-CRT effect on tongue volume decrease per month to 0.23 cm3 (P = .02). BMI significantly (P < .001) decreased by 0.11 units (SEM = 0.02) per month post radiation. CONCLUSION Tongue dysfunction and decreased tongue strength are significant contributors to the dysphagia that patients experience after receiving CRT. In this study, both tongue volume and BMI decreased post-CRT; therefore, BMI could potentially be used as a predictor of tongue volume post-CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Garber
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Voice Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Janine Rotsides
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Voice Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara Abu-Ghanem
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Voice Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ilana Bandler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Voice Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Smith
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irina Oyfe
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dawn-Marie Swahn
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mari Hagiwara
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Milan Amin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Voice Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aaron M Johnson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Voice Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
González Moreno I, Torres del Río S, Vázquez Olmos C. Seguimiento del cáncer de cabeza y cuello tratado. Lo que el radiólogo debe conocer. RADIOLOGIA 2020; 62:13-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
46
|
|
47
|
Gabelloni M, Faggioni L, Neri E. Imaging biomarkers in upper gastrointestinal cancers. BJR Open 2019; 1:20190001. [PMID: 33178936 PMCID: PMC7592483 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20190001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Revised: 02/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
In parallel with the increasingly widespread availability of high performance imaging platforms and recent progresses in pathobiological characterisation and treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies, imaging biomarkers have become a major research topic due to their potential to provide additional quantitative information to conventional imaging modalities that can improve accuracy at staging and follow-up, predict outcome, and guide treatment planning in an individualised manner. The aim of this review is to briefly examine the status of current knowledge about imaging biomarkers in the field of upper gastrointestinal cancers, highlighting their potential applications and future perspectives in patient management from diagnosis onwards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Gabelloni
- Department of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Faggioni
- Department of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Neri
- Department of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Chen M, Liu P, Chen Y, Chen Z, Shen M, Liu X, Li X, Lin Y, Yang R, Ni W, Zhou X, Zhang L, Tian Y, Chen J. Primary tumor regression patterns in esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy and implications for surveillance schemes. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:3361-3369. [PMID: 31114372 PMCID: PMC6489665 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s198524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The primary tumor regression patterns of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were investigated to determine an optimal surveillance scheme. Method: The clinical data and radiology images of patients before CRT, at completion of CRT and every 1–3 months for the subsequent 12 months or until disease progression were retrospectively reviewed to define the patterns of primary tumor regression after CRT. Survival rates were analyzed statistically in order to determine an optimal surveillance scheme. Results: A total of 82 patients were enrolled in the present study for analysis. At the first surveillance visit date at the end of CRT, a total of 21 patients achieved complete response (early-CR), 29 patients reached incomplete response (IR), 25 patients maintained stable disease (SD) and 7 patients encountered progression of disease (PD). During subsequent surveillance, a total of 14 IR patients regressed continuously to CR (later-CR), 15 patients maintained IR (early-IR) and 9 SD patients gradually regressed to IR (later-IR). At full tumor regression (FTR), a total of 21, 14, 15, 9, 16 and 7 patients were defined as early-CR, later-CR, early-IR, later-IR, SD and PD, respectively. The median FTR time for later-CR and later-IR was 7.5 and 7 weeks, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate of the early-CR group was 85.7% (P<0.001), which was higher compared with the later-CR (16.7%), early-IR (20%), later-IR (11.1%), SD (6.3%) and PD (0%) groups. Conclusion: The early-CR following CRT is a robust prognostic predictor in patients with ESCC. To optimize the determination of tumor regression, ≥7 weeks after CRT is an optimal initial surveillance visit date. The surveillance of non-CR patients should concentrate on symptoms, nutrition and psychosocial support, rather than screening for recurrence of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingqiu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.,Fujian Provincial Platform for Medical Laboratory Research of First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian, China.,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.,Institute of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Soochow University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Pingping Liu
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Yuangui Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Zhiwei Chen
- Fuzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Minmin Shen
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Xiqing Li
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Rongqiang Yang
- Cancer and Genetics Research Complex, Department Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, College Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Wei Ni
- Cancer and Genetics Research Complex, Department Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, College Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Xin Zhou
- Cancer and Genetics Research Complex, Department Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, College Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Lurong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Ye Tian
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.,Institute of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Soochow University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
McCarty JL, Corey AS, El-Deiry MW, Baddour HM, Cavazuti BM, Hudgins PA. Imaging of Surgical Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:5-13. [PMID: 30409846 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck surgical reconstruction is complex, and postoperative imaging interpretation is challenging. Surgeons now use microvascular free tissue transfer, also known as free flaps, more frequently in head and neck reconstruction than ever before. Thus, an understanding of free flaps, their expected appearance on cross-sectional imaging, and their associated complications (including tumor recurrence) is crucial for the interpreting radiologist. Despite the complexity and increasing frequency of free flap reconstruction, there is no comprehensive head and neck resource intended for the radiologist. We hope that this image-rich review will fill that void and serve as a go to reference for radiologists interpreting imaging of surgical free flaps in head and neck reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L McCarty
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (J.L.M.), University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, Texas
| | - A S Corey
- Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (A.S.C., P.A.H.)
- Atlanta VA Healthcare System (A.S.C.), Atlanta, Georgia
| | - M W El-Deiry
- Otolaryngology (M.W.E.-D., H.M.B.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - H M Baddour
- Otolaryngology (M.W.E.-D., H.M.B.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - P A Hudgins
- Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences (A.S.C., P.A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abdel Razek AAK. Diffusion tensor imaging in differentiation of residual head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from post-radiation changes. Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 54:84-89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 08/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|