1
|
Joyeux MA, Pierre A, Barrois M, Hoeffel C, Devie A, Brugel M, Bertin E. Stomach size in anorexia nervosa: A new challenge? EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW 2024; 32:784-794. [PMID: 38520705 DOI: 10.1002/erv.3089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Changes in stomach size may impact eating behaviour. A recent study showed gastric dilatation in restrictive eating disorders using computed tomography scans. This study aimed to describe stomach size in the standing position in women with anorexia nervosa (AN). METHODS Women treated for AN at our institution were retrospectively included if they had undergone upper gastrointestinal radiography (UGR) after the diagnosis of AN. Two control groups (CG1 and CG2) were included, both comprising female patients: CG1 patients were not obese and underwent UGR for digestive symptoms of other aetiologies, and CG2 comprised obese individuals who had UGR before bariatric surgery. A UGR-based Stomach Size Index (SSI), calculated as the ratio of the length of the stomach to the distance between the upper end of the stomach and the top of the iliac crests, was measured in all three groups. Gastromegaly was defined as SSI >1.00. RESULTS 45 patients suffering from AN (28 with restrictive and 17 with binge/purge subtype), 10 CG1 and 20 CG2 subjects were included in this study. Stomach Size Index was significantly higher in AN (1.27 ± 0.24) than in CG1 (0.80 ± 0.11) and CG2 (0.68 ± 0.09); p < 0.001, but was not significantly different between patients with the restrictive and binge/purge subtypes. Gastromegaly was present in 82.2% of patients with AN and not present in the control groups. In patients with AN, gastromegaly was present in 12/15 patients without digestive symptoms (80.0%) and in 25/30 patients with digestive complaints (83.3%) at time of UGR (p = 0.99). In the AN group, no significant relationship was found between SSI and body mass index. CONCLUSION Gastromegaly is frequent in AN and could influence AN recovery. This anatomical modification could partially explain the alterations of gastric motility previously reported in AN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Alix Joyeux
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Robert-Debré Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Antoine Pierre
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Robert-Debré Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Marion Barrois
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Robert-Debré Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Christine Hoeffel
- Department of Radiology, Robert-Debré Hospital and Reims-Champagne-Ardenne University, Reims, France
- Reims-Champagne-Ardenne University, Reims, France
| | - Antoine Devie
- Department of Radiology, Robert-Debré Hospital and Reims-Champagne-Ardenne University, Reims, France
| | - Mathias Brugel
- Reims-Champagne-Ardenne University, Reims, France
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Côte Basque, Bayonne, France
| | - Eric Bertin
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Robert-Debré Hospital, Reims, France
- Reims-Champagne-Ardenne University, Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Solomon N, Sailer A, Dixe de Oliveira Santo I, Pillai A, Heng LXX, Jha P, Katz DS, Zulfiqar M, Sugi M, Revzin MV. Sequelae of Eating Disorders at Imaging. Radiographics 2022; 42:1377-1397. [PMID: 35930473 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Although eating disorders are common, they tend to be underdiagnosed and undertreated because social stigma tends to make patients less likely to seek medical attention and less compliant with medical treatment. Diagnosis is crucial because these disorders can affect any organ system and are associated with the highest mortality rate of any psychiatric disorder. Because of this, imaging findings, when recognized, can be vital to the diagnosis and management of eating disorders and their related complications. The authors familiarize the radiologist with the pathophysiology and sequelae of eating disorders and provide an overview of the related imaging findings. Some imaging findings associated with eating disorders are nonspecific, and others are subtle. The presence of these findings should alert the radiologist to correlate them with the patient's medical history and laboratory results and the clinical team's findings at the physical examination. The combination of these findings may suggest a diagnosis that might otherwise be missed. Topics addressed include (a) the pathophysiology of eating disorders, (b) the clinical presentation of patients with eating disorders and their medical complications and sequelae, (c) the imaging features associated with common and uncommon sequelae of eating disorders, (d) an overview of management and treatment of eating disorders, and (e) conditions that can mimic eating disorders (eg, substance abuse, medically induced eating disorders, and malnourishment in patients with cancer). Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Solomon
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| | - Anne Sailer
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| | - Irene Dixe de Oliveira Santo
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| | - Aishwarya Pillai
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| | - Lauren Xuan Xin Heng
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| | - Priyanka Jha
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| | - Douglas S Katz
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| | - Maria Zulfiqar
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| | - Mark Sugi
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| | - Margarita V Revzin
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208042, Room TE-2, New Haven, CT 06520 (N.S., A.S., I.D.d.O.S., A.P., M.V.R.); Department of Science, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz (L.X.X.H.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (P.J., M.S.); Department of Radiology, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY (D.S.K.); and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (M.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|