2
|
Ni TT, Tsang W, Nguyen ET. Approach to Imaging of Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome With No Culprit Lesion Identified at Angiography. J Thorac Imaging 2024; 39:69-78. [PMID: 38270459 DOI: 10.1097/rti.0000000000000773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Chest pain is a common chief complaint among patients presenting to the emergency department. However, in the scenario where the clinical presentation is consistent with acute coronary syndrome and no culprit lesions are identified on angiography, clinicians and cardiac imagers should be informed of the differential diagnosis and appropriate imaging modalities used to investigate the potential causes. This review describes an imaging-based algorithm that highlights the diagnostic possibilities, their differentiating imaging features, and the important role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for narrowing the differential diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany T Ni
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
| | - Wendy Tsang
- Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Center, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto
| | - Elsie T Nguyen
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto
- University Medical Imaging Toronto, Peter Munk Cardiac Center, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kallis C, Kaura A, Samuel NA, Mulla A, Glampson B, O’Gallagher K, Davies J, Papadimitriou D, Woods KJ, Shah AD, Williams B, Asselbergs FW, Mayer EK, Lee RW, Herbert C, Grant SW, Curzen N, Squire IB, Johnson T, Shah AM, Perera D, Kharbanda RK, Patel RS, Channon KM, Mayet J, Quint JK. The Relationship Between Cardiac Troponin in People Hospitalised for Exacerbation of COPD and Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) and COPD Readmissions. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:2405-2416. [PMID: 37955026 PMCID: PMC10637362 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s432166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background No single biomarker currently risk stratifies chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients at the time of an exacerbation, though previous studies have suggested that patients with elevated troponin at exacerbation have worse outcomes. This study evaluated the relationship between peak cardiac troponin and subsequent major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including all-cause mortality and COPD hospital readmission, among patients admitted with COPD exacerbation. Methods Data from five cross-regional hospitals in England were analysed using the National Institute of Health Research Health Informatics Collaborative (NIHR-HIC) acute coronary syndrome database (2008-2017). People hospitalised with a COPD exacerbation were included, and peak troponin levels were standardised relative to the 99th percentile (upper limit of normal). We used Cox Proportional Hazard models adjusting for age, sex, laboratory results and clinical risk factors, and implemented logarithmic transformation (base-10 logarithm). The primary outcome was risk of MACE within 90 days from peak troponin measurement. Secondary outcome was risk of COPD readmission within 90 days from peak troponin measurement. Results There were 2487 patients included. Of these, 377 (15.2%) patients had a MACE event and 203 (8.2%) were readmitted within 90 days from peak troponin measurement. A total of 1107 (44.5%) patients had an elevated troponin level. Of 1107 patients with elevated troponin at exacerbation, 256 (22.8%) had a MACE event and 101 (9.0%) a COPD readmission within 90 days from peak troponin measurement. Patients with troponin above the upper limit of normal had a higher risk of MACE (adjusted HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.75-2.77) and COPD hospital readmission (adjusted HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.83) when compared with patients without elevated troponin. Conclusion An elevated troponin level at the time of COPD exacerbation may be a useful tool for predicting MACE in COPD patients. The relationship between degree of troponin elevation and risk of future events is complex and requires further investigation.
Collapse
Grants
- CH/16/1/32013 British Heart Foundation
- FS/20/18/34972 British Heart Foundation
- FS/CRA/22/23036 British Heart Foundation
- SP/17/16/33519 British Heart Foundation
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centres at Imperial, King’s, Oxford, UCLH, Royal Marsden and ICR, Leeds, Manchester, Southampton, Leicester, Bristol, and Guys & St Thomas’
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Kallis
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Amit Kaura
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nathan A Samuel
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Abdulrahim Mulla
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ben Glampson
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kevin O’Gallagher
- NIHR King’s Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College London and King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jim Davies
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Dimitri Papadimitriou
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kerrie J Woods
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Anoop D Shah
- NIHR University College London Biomedical Research Centre, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Bryan Williams
- NIHR University College London Biomedical Research Centre, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Folkert W Asselbergs
- NIHR University College London Biomedical Research Centre, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Erik K Mayer
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Imperial Clinical Analytics, Research & Evaluation (iCARE) and Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Richard W Lee
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Early Diagnosis and Detection Centre, NIHR BRC at The Royal Marsden and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Christopher Herbert
- NIHR Leeds Clinical Research Facility, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Stuart W Grant
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nick Curzen
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Iain B Squire
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Thomas Johnson
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Ajay M Shah
- NIHR Guys & St Thomas’ Hospital Clinical Research Facility, King’s College Hospital, and King’s College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, London, UK
| | - Divaka Perera
- NIHR King’s Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College London and King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rajesh K Kharbanda
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Riyaz S Patel
- NIHR University College London Biomedical Research Centre, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Keith M Channon
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jamil Mayet
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jennifer K Quint
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Greer C, Williams MC, Newby DE, Adamson PD. Role of computed tomography cardiac angiography in acute chest pain syndromes. Heart 2023; 109:1350-1356. [PMID: 36914247 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Use of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) to evaluate chest pain has rapidly increased over the recent years. While its utility in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in stable chest pain syndromes is clear and is strongly endorsed by international guidelines, the role of CTCA in the acute setting is less certain. In the low-risk setting, CTCA has been shown to be accurate, safe and efficient but inherent low rates of adverse events in this population and the advent of high-sensitivity troponin testing have left little room for CTCA to show any short-term clinical benefit.In higher-risk populations, CTCA has potential to fulfil a gatekeeper role to invasive angiography. The high negative predictive value of CTCA is maintained while also identifying non-obstructive coronary disease and alternative diagnoses in the substantial group of patients presenting with chest pain who do not have type 1 myocardial infarction. For those with obstructive coronary disease, CTCA provides accurate assessment of stenosis severity, characterisation of high-risk plaque and findings associated with perivascular inflammation. This may allow more appropriate selection of patients to proceed to invasive management with no disadvantage in outcomes and can provide a more comprehensive risk stratification to guide both acute and long-term management than routine invasive angiography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Greer
- Christchurch Heart Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | | | - David E Newby
- Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Philip D Adamson
- Christchurch Heart Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
- Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mastrodicasa D, Aquino GJ, Ordovas KG, Vargas D, Fleischmann D, Abbara S, Hanneman K. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging Highlights 2022. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2023; 5:e230042. [PMID: 37404783 PMCID: PMC10316293 DOI: 10.1148/ryct.230042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
Since its inaugural issue in 2019, Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging has disseminated the latest scientific advances and technical developments in cardiac, vascular, and thoracic imaging. In this review, we highlight select articles published in this journal between October 2021 and October 2022. The scope of the review encompasses various aspects of coronary artery and congenital heart diseases, vascular diseases, thoracic imaging, and health services research. Key highlights include changes in the revised Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System 2.0, the value of coronary CT angiography in informing prognosis and guiding treatment decisions, cardiac MRI findings after COVID-19 vaccination or infection, high-risk features at CT angiography to identify patients with aortic dissection at risk for late adverse events, and CT-guided fiducial marker placement for preoperative planning for pulmonary nodules. Ongoing research and future directions include photon-counting CT and artificial intelligence applications in cardiovascular imaging. Keywords: Pediatrics, CT Angiography, CT-Perfusion, CT-Spectral Imaging, MR Angiography, PET/CT, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation/Replacement (TAVI/TAVR), Cardiac, Pulmonary, Vascular, Aorta, Coronary Arteries © RSNA, 2023.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lorenzatti D, Piña P, Csecs I, Schenone AL, Gongora CA, Garcia MJ, Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Williams MC, Dey D, Berman DS, Virani SS, Slipczuk L. Does Coronary Plaque Morphology Matter Beyond Plaque Burden? Curr Atheroscler Rep 2023; 25:167-180. [PMID: 36808390 DOI: 10.1007/s11883-023-01088-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Imaging of adverse coronary plaque features by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has advanced greatly and at a fast pace. We aim to describe the evolution, present and future in plaque analysis, and its value in comparison to plaque burden. RECENT FINDINGS Recently, it has been demonstrated that in addition to plaque burden, quantitative and qualitative assessment of coronary plaque by CCTA can improve the prediction of future major adverse cardiovascular events in diverse coronary artery disease scenarios. The detection of high-risk non-obstructive coronary plaque can lead to higher use of preventive medical therapies such as statins and aspirin, help identify culprit plaque, and differentiate between myocardial infarction types. Even more, over traditional plaque burden, plaque analysis including pericoronary inflammation can potentially be useful tools for tracking disease progression and response to medical therapy. The identification of the higher risk phenotypes with plaque burden, plaque characteristics, or ideally both can allow the allocation of targeted therapies and potentially monitor response. Further observational data are now required to investigate these key issues in diverse populations, followed by rigorous randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lorenzatti
- Cardiology Division, Montefiore Healthcare Network/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Pamela Piña
- Cardiology Division, Montefiore Healthcare Network/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Cardiology Division, CEDIMAT Cardiovascular Center, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Ibolya Csecs
- Cardiology Division, Montefiore Healthcare Network/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Aldo L Schenone
- Cardiology Division, Montefiore Healthcare Network/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Carlos A Gongora
- Cardiology Division, Montefiore Healthcare Network/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Mario J Garcia
- Cardiology Division, Montefiore Healthcare Network/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Blaha
- Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Budoff
- Department of Medicine, Lundquist Institute at Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Michelle C Williams
- BHF Centre of Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Imaging, Queen's Medical Research Institute University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Damini Dey
- Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel S Berman
- Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Salim S Virani
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Leandro Slipczuk
- Cardiology Division, Montefiore Healthcare Network/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
- Clinical Cardiology, Advanced Cardiac Imaging, CV Atherosclerosis and Lipid Disorder Center, Montefiore Health System, NewYork, USA.
| |
Collapse
|