1
|
Zheng Z, Shang Y, Wang N, Liu X, Xin C, Yan X, Zhai Y, Yin J, Zhang J, Zhang Z. Current Advancement on the Dynamic Mechanism of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Int J Biol Sci 2021; 17:4154-4164. [PMID: 34803489 PMCID: PMC8579455 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.65066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common clinical disease associated with upper gastrointestinal motility disorders. Recently, with improvements in living standards and changes in lifestyle and dietary habits, the incidence of GERD has been increasing yearly. However, the mechanism of GERD has not been fully elucidated due to its complex pathogenesis, and this had led to unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes. Currently, the occurrence and development of GERD involve multiple factors. Its pathogenesis is mainly thought to be related to factors, such as lower esophageal sphincter pressure, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, crural diaphragmatic dysfunction, hiatus hernia, and impaired esophageal clearance. Therefore, explaining the pathogenesis of GERD more clearly and systematically, exploring potential and effective therapeutic targets, and choosing the best treatment methods have gradually become the focus of scholars' attention. Herein, we reviewed current advancements in the dynamic mechanism of GERD to better counsel patients on possible treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxi Shang
- Department of Hematology, Fuxing Hospital, Eighth Clinical Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoye Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Chenglin Xin
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaosheng Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuhao Zhai
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Yin
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
- Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a multifaceted disorder encompassing a family of syndromes attributable to, or exacerbated by, gastroesophageal reflux that impart morbidity, mainly through troublesome symptoms. Major GERD phenotypes are non-erosive reflux disease, GERD hypersensitivity, low or high grade esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, reflux chest pain, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and regurgitation dominant reflux. GERD is common throughout the world, and its epidemiology is linked to the Western lifestyle, obesity, and the demise of Helicobacter pylori. Because of its prevalence and chronicity, GERD is a substantial economic burden measured in physician visits, diagnostics, cancer surveillance protocols, and therapeutics. An individual with typical symptoms has a fivefold risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma, but mortality from GERD is otherwise rare. The principles of management are to provide symptomatic relief and to minimize potential health risks through some combination of lifestyle modifications, diagnostic testing, pharmaceuticals (mainly to suppress or counteract gastric acid secretion), and surgery. However, it is usually a chronic recurring condition and management needs to be personalized to each case. While escalating proton pump inhibitor therapy may be pertinent to healing high grade esophagitis, its applicability to other GERD phenotypes wherein the modulating effects of anxiety, motility, hypersensitivity, and non-esophageal factors may dominate is highly questionable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Katzka
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Peter J Kahrilas
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zachariah RA, Goo T, Lee RH. Mechanism and Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2020; 30:209-226. [PMID: 32146942 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) describes a process in which gastric contents travel retrograde into the esophagus. GER can be either a physiologic phenomenon that occurs in asymptomatic individuals or can potentially cause symptoms. When the latter occurs, this represents GER disease (GERD). The process by which GER transforms into GERD begins at the esophagogastric junction. Impaired clearance of the refluxate also contributes to GERD. Reflux causes degradation of esophageal mucosal defense. The refluxate triggers sensory afferents leading to symptom generation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin A Zachariah
- H.H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 400, Room 459, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Tyralee Goo
- Tibor Rubin Veterans' Affairs Medical Center, 5901 E. Seventh Street, Long Beach, CA 90822, USA
| | - Robert H Lee
- H.H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 400, Room 459, Orange, CA 92868, USA; Tibor Rubin Veterans' Affairs Medical Center, 5901 E. Seventh Street, Long Beach, CA 90822, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Langfitt E, Prittie JE, Buriko Y, Calabro JM. Disorders of micturition in small animal patients: clinical significance, etiologies, and management strategies. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2017; 27:164-177. [PMID: 28122140 DOI: 10.1111/vec.12564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Revised: 03/27/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review the physiology of micturition, the pathophysiology of micturition disorders, and current pharmacological agents used to treat these disorders. To discuss different urinary catheterization techniques, along with the risks of catheter-associated urinary tract infections attributed with these techniques. ETIOLOGY Many critically ill veterinary patients are at risk of developing a number of neurological and non neurological micturition-related disorders. DIAGNOSIS Micturition disorders can be diagnosed based on physical examination findings, urinary voiding contrast studies, urethral pressure profiles, and diagnostic testing such as urinalysis and urine cultures. THERAPY Therapy can be either pharmacological, involvement of urinary catheterization, surgical, or a combination of all the above. The goal of the treatment is to correct the underlying causes resulting in the micturition-related disorder, and if possible, allow the patient to regain their normal physiological micturition behavior. PROGNOSIS Depending on the underlying disease process and duration of the micturition disorder, the prognosis can be variable. In many instances, near-normal or normal function can return, but in severe cases, the patient may not regain its normal, appropriate micturition response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Langfitt
- Friendship Hospital for Animals, Urgent Care Service, Washington, DC, 20016
| | - Jennifer E Prittie
- Animal Medical Center, Emergency and Critical Care Service, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Yekaterina Buriko
- Animal Medical Center, Emergency and Critical Care Service, New York, NY, 10065
| | - Janine M Calabro
- Friendship Hospital for Animals, Urgent Care Service, Washington, DC, 20016
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Eructation is composed of three independent phases: gas escape, upper barrier elimination, and gas transport phases. The gas escape phase is the gastro-LES inhibitory reflex that causes transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter, which is activated by distension of stretch receptors of the proximal stomach. The upper barrier elimination phase is the transient relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter along with airway protection. This phase is activated by stimulation of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors of the esophageal mucosa. The gas transport phase is esophageal reverse peristalsis mediated by elementary reflexes, and it is theorized that this phase is activated by serosal rapidly adapting tension receptors. Alteration of the receptors which activate the upper barrier elimination phase of eructation by gastro-esophageal reflux of acid may in part contribute to the development of supra-esophageal reflux disease.
Collapse
|
6
|
Brozmanová M, Mazúrová L, Tatár M, Kollárik M. Evaluation of the effect of GABA(B) agonists on the vagal nodose C-fibers in the esophagus. Physiol Res 2013; 62:285-95. [PMID: 23489191 DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.932429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical studies showed that GABA(B) receptor agonists improve symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. One proposed mechanism of this effect is direct inhibition of the gastroesophageal vagal tension mechanosensors by GABA(B) agonists leading to reduction of reflux. In addition to tension mechanosensors, the vagal nodose ganglion supplies the esophagus with nociceptive C-fibers that likely contribute to impairment of esophageal reflex regulation in diseases. We hypothesized that GABA(B) agonists inhibit mechanically-induced activation of vagal esophageal nodose C-fibers in baseline and/or in sensitized state induced by inflammatory mediators. Ex vivo extracellular recordings were made from the esophageal nodose C-fibers in the isolated vagally-innervated guinea pig esophagus. We found that the selective GABA(B) agonist baclofen (100-300 microM) did not inhibit activation of esophageal nodose C-fibers evoked by esophageal distention (10-60 mmHg). The mechanical response of esophageal nodose C-fibers can be sensitized by different pathways including the stimulation of the histamine H(1) receptor and the stimulation the adenosine A(2A) receptor. Baclofen failed to inhibit mechanical sensitization of esophageal nodose C-fibers induced by histamine (100 microM) or the selective adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS21680 (3 nM). Our data suggest that the direct mechanical inhibition of nodose C-fibers in the esophagus is unlikely to contribute to beneficial effects of GABA(B) agonists in patients with esophageal diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Brozmanová
- Department of Pathophysiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin, Slovakia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee YY, Whiting JGH, Robertson EV, Derakhshan MH, Wirz AA, Smith D, Morrison D, Kelman A, Connolly P, McColl KEL. Kinetics of transient hiatus hernia during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and swallows in healthy subjects. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24:990-e539. [PMID: 22680279 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01948.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proximal displacement of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) is present in hiatus hernia but also occurs transiently during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and swallows. Using a novel magnetic-based technique we have performed detailed examination of the GEJ movement during TLESRs and swallows in healthy subjects. METHODS In 12 subjects, a magnet was endoscopically clipped to the GEJ and combined assembly of Hall-Effect locator probe and 36 channel high-resolution manometer passed nasally. After a test meal the subjects were studied for 90 min. KEY RESULTS The median amplitude of proximal movement of GEJ during TLESRs was 4.3 cm (1.6-8.8 cm) and this was substantially greater than during swallowing at 1.2 cm (0.4-2.7 cm), P = 0.002. With both TLESRs and swallows proximal GEJ movement coincided with lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and return to its original position occurred 4 s after return of LES tone. Kinetic modeling of the movement of the GEJ during TLESRs indicated two return phases with the initial return phase having the greater velocity (0.9 cm s(-1) ) and being strongly correlated with amplitude of proximal movement (r = 0.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES The marked proximal GEJ migration during TLESRs represents very severe herniation of the GEJ. The rapid initial return of the GEJ following TLESRs when the crural diaphragm is relaxed and its correlation with amplitude suggest it is due to elastic recoil of the phreno-esophageal ligament. The marked stretching of the phreno-esophageal ligament during TLESRs may contribute to its weakening and development of established hiatus hernia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Y Lee
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lehmann A, Antonsson M, Aurell-Holmberg A, Blackshaw LA, Brändén L, Elebring T, Jensen J, Kärrberg L, Mattsson JP, Nilsson K, Oja SS, Saransaari P, von Unge S. Different in vitro and in vivo profiles of substituted 3-aminopropylphosphinate and 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinate GABA(B) receptor agonists as inhibitors of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation. Br J Pharmacol 2012; 165:1757-1772. [PMID: 21950457 DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01682.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Gastro-oesophageal reflux is predominantly caused by transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR) and GABA(B) receptor stimulation inhibits TLOSR. Lesogaberan produces fewer CNS side effects than baclofen, which has been attributed to its affinity for the GABA transporter (GAT), the action of which limits stimulation of central GABA(B) receptors. To understand the structure-activity relationship for analogues of lesogaberan (3-aminopropylphosphinic acids), and corresponding 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids, we have compared representatives of these classes in different in vitro and in vivo models. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH The compounds were characterized in terms of GABA(B) agonism in vitro. Binding to GATs and cellular uptake was done using rat brain membranes and slices respectively. TLOSR was measured in dogs, and CNS side effects were evaluated as hypothermia in mice and rats. KEY RESULTS 3-Aminopropylphosphinic acids inhibited TLOSR with a superior therapeutic index compared to 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids. This difference was most likely due to differential GAT-mediated uptake into brain cells of the former but not latter. In agreement, 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids were much more potent in producing hypothermia in rats even when administered i.c.v. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS An enhanced therapeutic window for 3-aminopropylphosphinic acids compared with 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids with respect to inhibition of TLOSR was observed and is probably mechanistically linked to neural cell uptake of the former but not latter group of compounds. These findings offer a platform for discovery of new GABA(B) receptor agonists for the treatment of reflux disease and other conditions where selective peripheral GABA(B) receptor agonism may afford therapeutic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lehmann
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - M Antonsson
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - A Aurell-Holmberg
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - L A Blackshaw
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - L Brändén
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - T Elebring
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - J Jensen
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - L Kärrberg
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - J P Mattsson
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - K Nilsson
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - S S Oja
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - P Saransaari
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | - S von Unge
- AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, SwedenNerve Gut Research Laboratory, Hanson Institute, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaDepartment of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, FinlandBrain Research Center, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leslie E, Bhargava V, Mittal RK. A novel pattern of longitudinal muscle contraction with subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus: a possible mechanism of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2012; 302:G542-7. [PMID: 22173917 PMCID: PMC3311436 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00349.2011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2011] [Accepted: 12/10/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
A subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus induces lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and inhibits progression of ongoing peristaltic contraction in the esophagus. Recent studies show that longitudinal muscle contraction of the esophagus may play a role in LES relaxation. Our goal was to determine whether a subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus induces contraction of the longitudinal muscle of the esophagus and to determine the nature of this contraction. Studies were conducted in 16 healthy subjects. High resolution manometry (HRM) recorded pressures, and high frequency intraluminal ultrasound (HFIUS) images recorded longitudinal muscle contraction at various locations in the esophagus. Subthreshold pharyngeal stimulation was induced by injection of minute amounts of water in the pharynx. A subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus induced strong contraction and caudal descent of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) along with relaxation of the LES. HFIUS identified longitudinal muscle contraction of the proximal (3-5 cm below the UES) but not the distal esophagus. Pharyngeal stimulus, following a dry swallow, blocked the progression of dry swallow-induced peristalsis; this was also associated with UES contraction and descent along with the contraction of longitudinal muscle of the proximal esophagus. We identify a unique pattern of longitudinal muscle contraction of the proximal esophagus in response to subthreshold pharyngeal stimulus, which we propose may be responsible for relaxation of the distal esophagus and LES through the stretch sensitive activation of myenteric inhibitory motor neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Leslie
- Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego VA Healthcare System, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sigfridsson K, Andersson T, Berntsson V, Wang Y. Early pharmaceutical evaluation of a crystalline and hygroscopic GABAB receptor agonist. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2012; 39:1573-81. [DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2012.662507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
11
|
|
12
|
Kessing BF, Conchillo JM, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJPM, Masclee AAM. Review article: the clinical relevance of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33:650-61. [PMID: 21219371 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04565.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSR) are considered the physiological mechanism that enables venting of gas from the stomach and appear as sphincter relaxations that are not induced by swallowing. It has become increasingly clear that most reflux episodes occur during TLOSRs and therefore play a key role in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM To describe the current knowledge about TLOSRs and its clinical implications. METHODS Search of the literature published in English using the PubMed database and relevant abstracts presented at international conventions. RESULTS Several factors influence the rate of TLOSRs including anti-reflux surgery, meal, body position, nutrition, lifestyle and a wide array of neurotransmitters. Ongoing insights in the neurotransmitters responsible for the modulation of TLOSRs, as well as the neural pathways involved in TLOSR induction, have lead to novel therapeutic targets. These therapeutic targets can serve as an add-on therapy in patients with an unsatisfactory response to proton pump inhibitor by inhibiting TLOSRs and its associated reflux events. However, the TLOSR-inhibiting drugs that are currently available still have significant side effects. CONCLUSION It is likely that in the future, selected GERD patients may benefit from transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation inhibition when compounds are found without significant side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B F Kessing
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Babaei A, Bhargava V, Korsapati H, Zheng WH, Mittal RK. A unique longitudinal muscle contraction pattern associated with transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Gastroenterology 2008; 134:1322-31. [PMID: 18384786 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2007] [Accepted: 01/24/2008] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Contraction of the longitudinal muscle of the esophagus may play a role in the relaxation and opening of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The goal of our study was to determine the pattern and precise temporal correlation between local longitudinal muscle contraction (LMC) of the esophagus during peristalsis and transient LES relaxation (TLESR). METHODS Esophageal pressures and high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound imaging of the esophagus were recorded in 24 healthy subjects during swallow-induced peristalsis and spontaneous TLESR. Intraluminal multiple impedance recordings were obtained to determine the relationship between "common cavity pressure" and gastroesophageal reflux (GER). RESULTS During swallow-induced peristalsis, there is simultaneous contraction of circular and longitudinal muscles of the esophagus. On the other hand, TLESR is associated with a distinct pattern of LMC in the esophagus that has the following characteristics: (1) it is restricted to the distal esophagus; (2) it begins before the onset of TLESR and spreads in a retrograde manner; (3) it is generally stronger than the swallow-induced contraction; and (4) it is sustained during the entire duration of TLESR. The increase in esophageal pressure during TLESR is temporally correlated with the contraction of the LM of the distal esophagus, rather than with the impedance recorded GER. CONCLUSIONS We propose that the LMC of the distal esophagus may play an important role in the relaxation of LES and induction of GER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Babaei
- Division of Gastroenterology, San Diego VA Health Care System and University of California, San Diego, California
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sigfridsson K, Andersson T, Nilsson L, Schönbacher V, Wang Y. Pharmaceutical and analytical characterisation of (2R)-(3-amino-2-fluoropropyl)sulphinic acid, a GABAB receptor agonist. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007; 65:104-10. [PMID: 16962748 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2006.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2006] [Revised: 07/06/2006] [Accepted: 07/06/2006] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
(2R)-(3-amino-2-fluoropropyl)sulphinic acid (AFPSiA) is a potent GABAB agonist, which makes it a possible alternative in future GERD treatment. The degradation of AFPSiA was investigated to support the drug-development effort. The compound is too polar to be compatible with regular reversed-phase LC. Moreover, the compound and the degradation products cannot be detected by UV due to low absorption. Instead, the degradation of AFPSiA was followed by two different capillary electrophoresis methods with indirect UV detection and 1H NMR and 19F NMR. AFPSiA was very unstable in basic conditions and at temperatures above room temperature. The corresponding sulphonic acid and allylamine are formed via two separate degradation routes. Both these degradation products may cause unwanted side-effects in vivo. Aqueous solutions of AFPSiA were found to be more stable at pH between 1 and 3. It was suggested that AFPSiA should be stored frozen, preferably at -70 degrees C. In solid state, the compound can be stored at ambient conditions in closed vials with low relative humidity. A solid oral dosage form should be kept in a blister package.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalle Sigfridsson
- Pharmaceutical and Analytical R&D, AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lehmann A, Holmberg AA, Bhatt U, Bremner-Danielsen M, Brändén L, Elg S, Elebring T, Fitzpatrick K, Geiss WB, Guzzo P, Jensen J, Jerndal G, Mattsson JP, Nilsson K, Olsson BM. Effects of (2R)-(3-amino-2-fluoropropyl)sulphinic acid (AFPSiA) on transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation in dogs and mechanism of hypothermic effects in mice. Br J Pharmacol 2005; 146:89-97. [PMID: 15980875 PMCID: PMC1576248 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The effects of the novel GABA analogue (2R)-(3-amino-2-fluoropropyl)sulphinic acid (AFPSiA) on transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) were studied in the dog. In addition, the GABA(A)/GABA(B) selectivity was determined in vitro and in vivo, and the pharmacokinetics and the metabolism of the compound were studied in the dog and rat. TLOSRs were reduced by 55 +/- 8% after intragastric administration of AFPSiA at 14 mumol kg(-1) and did not decrease further at higher doses. When evaluated 2 and 4 h after administration, the effect declined to 37 +/- 6 and 16 +/- 9%, respectively. Spontaneous swallowing was only significantly inhibited at 100 micromol kg(-1). The oral availability of AFPSiA was 52 +/- 17 and 71 +/- 4% in the dog and rat, respectively. A fraction of AFPSiA was oxidised to the corresponding sulphonate, (2R)-(3-amino-2-fluoropropyl)sulphonic acid (AFPSoA) after oral administration to the rat and dog. In rat brain membranes, AFPSiA was found to have ten times higher affinity for rat brain GABA(B) (K(i) =47 +/- 4.4 nM) compared to GABA(A) (K(i) = 430 +/- 46 nM) binding sites. The compound was a full agonist at human recombinant GABA(B(1a,2)) receptors (EC(50) = 130 +/- 10 nM). In contrast, the metabolite AFPSoA was considerably more selective for binding to rat brain GABA(A) (K(i) = 37 +/- 3.1 nM) vs GABA(B) (K(i) = 6800 +/- 280 nM) receptors. In the mouse, high doses (1-8 mmol kg(-1)) of AFPSiA induced a rapid and mild hypothermia followed by a profound and sustained hypothermia at the higher doses tested (6 and 8 mmol kg(-1)). This effect was unaffected by the selective GABA(B) receptor antagonist CGP62349. AFPSoA (1 and 2 mmol kg(-1)) produced transient and moderate hypothermia while the hypothermic response was considerably larger at 4 mmol kg(-1).It is concluded that AFPSiA inhibits but does not abolish TLOSRs in the dog. High doses of the compound induce hypothermia in the mouse, which probably is attributable to activation of the GABA(A) receptor. The latter effect may be caused both by AFPSiA and its oxidised sulphonic acid metabolite AFPSoA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Lehmann
- Integrative Pharmacology, Gastrointestinal Biology, AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cappell MS. Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Clin North Am 2005; 89:243-91. [PMID: 15656927 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2004.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
GERD is ubiquitous throughout the adult population in the United States. It commonly adversely affects quality of life and occasionally causes life-threatening complications. The new and emerging medical and endoscopic therapies for GERD and the new management strategies for BE should dramatically reduce the clinical toll of this disease on society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell S Cappell
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA 19141-3098, USA.
| |
Collapse
|