H. pylori and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations induced by gastric distension in healthy humans

ASSESSMENT OF THE INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA IN ADULTS WITH EROSIVE ESOPHAGITIS

BACKGROUND

The intestinal microbiota influences the appropriate function of the gastrointestinal tract. Intestinal dysbiosis may be associated with a higher risk of esophageal lesions, mainly due to changes in gastroesophageal motility patterns, elevation of intra-abdominal pressure, and increased frequency of transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intestinal microbiota in individuals with erosive esophagitis and in healthy individuals using metagenomics.

METHODS

A total of 22 fecal samples from adults aged between 18 and 60 years were included. Eleven individuals had esophagitis (eight men and three women) and 11 were healthy controls (10 men and one woman). The individuals were instructed to collect and store fecal material into a tube containing guanidine solution. The DNA of the microbiota was extracted from each fecal samples and PCR amplification was performed using primers for the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The amplicons were sequenced using the Ion Torrent PGM platform and the data were analyzed using the QIIME™ software version 1.8. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test and the ANOSIM non-parametric method based on distance matrix.

RESULTS

The alpha-diversity and beta-diversity indices were similar between the two groups, without statistically significant differences. There was no statistically significant difference in the phylum level. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in the abundance of the family Clostridiaceae (0.3% vs 2.0%, P=0.032) and in the genus Faecaliumbacterium (10.5% vs 4.5%, P=0.045) between healthy controls and esophagitis patients.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that reduced abundance of the genus Faecaliumbacterium and greater abundance of the family Clostridiaceae may be risk factors for the development of erosive esophagitis. Intervention in the composition of the intestinal microbiota should be considered as an adjunct to current therapeutic strategies for this clinical condition.

Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to discuss key studies conducted on the intriguing relationship between Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Epidemiological studies have repeatedly described a negative association between H. pylori infection and erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma, but not between H. pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Especially, infection with CagA-positive strains appears to protect the distal esophagus by causing fundic gland atrophy and impaired gastric acid secretion. Although earlier reports suggested the development of erosive esophagitis after H. pylori eradication, more recent studies discuss that H. pylori eradication usually does not have an important clinical impact on gastroesophageal reflux disease.

SUMMARY

Gastric atrophy is the most widely accepted mechanism by which the distal esophagus is protected from abnormal acid exposure in patients with H. pylori infection. The clinical impact of H. pylori infection on the prevalence of erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus remains a matter of debate. In areas with a high prevalence of H. pylori-induced atrophic gastritis, the protection that this infection may afford against gastroesophageal reflux disease is not comparable to the risk that H. pylori poses for the development of gastric cancer.

Patients with Helicobacter pylori infection have less severe gastroesophageal reflux disease: a study using endoscopy, 24-hour gastric and esophageal pH metry

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Helicobacter pylori is controversial. We evaluated endoscopic, 24-h gastric and esophageal acid profile among patients with GERD in relation to H. pylori, as the latter might alter gastric acid secretion.

METHODS

Patients with GERD (n = 123), who were not on acid-suppressive drugs, and had not received anti-H. pylori therapy, underwent gastroduodenoscopy and tests for H. pylori detection. Esophageal manometry, 24-h pH metry, serum pepsinogen-I (PG-I), PG-II and gastrin-17 ELISA were done in all these patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess independent predictors for erosive esophagitis (EE).

RESULTS

Of 123 patients (mean age 40.5 [13.1] years, 85 [69.1%] men), 59 (47.9%) had H. pylori infection. EE was more common in H. pylori non-infected than infected (49 vs. 32, p < 0.001). Among patients older than 40 years, absence of H. pylori was associated with lower esophageal pH and longer reflux (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). PG-I/PG-II ratio was lower in H. pylori infected subjects (p < 0.001). In patients with higher LA grade of esophagitis, elevated PG-I levels and PG-I/PG-II ratio were associated with more acidic stomach (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed low gastrin-17 (p = 0.016), higher age (p = 0.013), hiatus hernia (p = 0.004) and absence of H. pylori (p = 0.03) were independent predictors for risk of EE.

CONCLUSION

H. pylori infection is associated with less acidic stomach and less severe GERD. Low gastrin-17, higher age, hiatus hernia and absence of H. pylori were the best predictors for EE risk.

The prokinetic effect of mosapride citrate combined with omeprazole therapy improves clinical symptoms and gastric emptying in PPI-resistant NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients are less sensitive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment than patients with erosive reflux disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether treatment with prokinetics in addition to omeprazole therapy would improve clinical symptoms, gastric emptying and esophageal peristalsis in PPI-resistant NERD patients with or without delayed gastric emptying.

METHODS

Subjects were 64 consecutive patients presenting with typical symptoms of PPl-resistant NERD (n = 44) and 20 healthy volunteers. PPI-resistant NERD patients underwent mosapride citrate (15 mg/day) and omeprazole (20 mg/day) co-therapy for 12 weeks. We evaluated the clinical symptoms as well as gastric emptying and esophageal manometry before and after combined therapy. We measured both acylated- and des-acylated plasma ghrelin levels by the ELISA method. The primary endopoint was to investigate whether co-administration of mosapride citrate and omeprazole would improve clinical symptoms and gastric emptying in PPI-resistant NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying.

RESULTS

T (max) value in PPI-resistant NERD patients was significantly higher than in healthy volunteers. Combination therapy with the prokinetic agent mosapride citrate and omeprazole significantly improved reflux symptoms and T (max) value in T (max) > 65 min NERD patients. Co-therapy also significantly reduced des-acylated-ghrelin levels in NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of mosapride citrate in addition to omeprazole improved gastro-esophageal reflux and gastric emptying in PPI-resistant NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying.

Clinical and endoscopic features of Chinese reflux esophagitis patients

AIM: To analyze the clinical and endoscopic features of Chinese patients with reflux esophagitis (RE).

METHODS: A total of 1405 RE patients were analyzed retrospectively. Data on gender, age, presence/absence of H pylori infection and associated esophageal hiatal hernia were collected. Esophagitis was divided into different grades according to Los Angeles Classification.

RESULTS: Of 18823 patients, 1405 were diagnosed as RE. The ratio of male to female patients was 1.75:1 (P < 0.01). The mean age of male and female patients was significantly different (P = 0.01). The peak age at onset of the disease was 40-60 years. According to Los Angeles Classification, there were significant differences in the age of patients with grades A and B compared to patients with grades C and D (P < 0.01). Two hundred and seventy-seven patients were infected with H pylori, the infection rate was low (P < 0.01). Complication of esophageal hiatal hernia was found to be significantly associated with the severity of esophagitis and age in 195 patients (P < 0.01). Esophageal mucosa damages were mainly located at the right esophageal wall.

CONCLUSION: The peak age of onset of RE is 40-60 years and higher in males than in females. The mean age of onset of RE is lower in males than in females. The infection rate of H pylori is significantly decreased in patients with esophagitis. Old age and esophageal hiatal hernia are associated with more severe esophagitis. Right esophageal mucosal damage can occur more often in RE patients.

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux diseases in Chinese--role of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and esophageal motor dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) is the major mechanism for gastroesophageal reflux in the Western population. The major reflux mechanism in Chinese patients with GERD has not been studied before.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with GERD and 28 controls underwent stationary baseline manometry and the 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. TLESRs were measured before and after an 850 kcal meal in the supine position. Primary peristalsis, secondary peristalsis, and esophageal acid clearance were measured by esophageal manometry.

RESULTS

Total time esophageal pH </= 4 (7.3 vs 1.5, p= 0.001) was significantly higher in patients with GERD when compared to controls. Majority of acid reflux episodes was due to TLESR in both patients with GERD and controls. The frequency of TLESRs after meal was similar between patients with GERD and controls (1.0 vs 1.3/h, p= 0.34). There was no difference in the distribution of reflux mechanism between patients with GERD and controls. However, patients with GERD had a significantly lower successful primary peristalsis (59%vs 70%, p= 0.043) when compared to controls.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of TLESRs was similar between patients with GERD and controls during stationary manometry. Primary peristalsis was impaired in Chinese patients with GERD. Esophageal motor dysfunction may contribute to the pathophysiology of GERD in the Chinese population.

H. pylori and GERD: is less more?

Does chronic Helicobacter pylori gastritis prevent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its sequelae? Yes, no, life should be so simple. A quick Medline search on the paired terms identified 527 citations since 1988 and that tells you something right there. Evidently, this is a complex relationship and attempting to reduce it to a yes/no answer is just not going to work. Perusing the literature, it becomes apparent that some combination of three component questions are in fact being asked: (i) Is it biologically plausible that H. pylori gastritis will reduce the occurrence of GERD? (ii) Is there an inverse epidemiological relationship between H. pylori infection and GERD? and (iii) Will the eradication of H. pylori unleash an epidemic of GERD? Each of these questions entails a unique set of consideration. We will consider each in turn.

SR 48692, a specific neurotensin receptor antagonist, has no effect on oesophageal motility in humans

BACKGROUND

The administration of exogenous neurotensin can reduce the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, but it is unclear whether this effect is pharmacological or physiological.

AIM

A specific neurotensin receptor antagonist (SR 48692) was used to assess the effect of endogenous neurotensin on lower oesophageal sphincter function.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy male subjects were included in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over study designed to determine the effects of two single doses (90 and 300 mg, preceded by a loading dose) of SR 48692 on the resting lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations, primary oesophageal peristalsis and oesophageal acid exposure. Oesophageal pH and motility recordings were performed during 1 h of fasting and 3 h post-prandially. Plasma neurotensin-like immunoreactivity release was determined by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

During fasting, the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation rate and reflux episodes were similar with the two doses of SR 48692 and placebo. Meal ingestion induced a rise in plasma neurotensin-like immunoreactivity, a decrease in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and an increase in both the transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation rate and the number of reflux episodes, which were not significantly modified by SR 48692. SR 48692 did not affect oesophageal primary peristalsis.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that SR 48692, a specific neurotensin 1 receptor antagonist, has no effect on oesophageal motility in humans.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroesophageal function

BACKGROUND

To elucidate the cause of possible occurrence of reflux esophagitis after Helicobacter pylori eradication, gastric and esophageal function among H. pylori infected Japanese patients were evaluated both before and after eradication therapy.

METHODS

Nine H. pylori-positive patients were studied before and 6 months after successful H. pylori eradication. Studies included gastric emptying, esophageal manometry, gastric and esophageal pH monitoring as well as measuring serum levels of gastrin, pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori eradication was associated with a significant change in serum gastrin and pepsinogen levels, consistent with the improvement in mucosal inflammation. There was no significant change in gastric emptying, fasting or postprandial lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, esophageal primary peristaltic contractions, frequency of transient LES relaxation, or gastroesophageal reflux, as assessed by 24 h pH monitoring. The percent time of the gastric pH>4 at night decreased significantly. A 41-year-old male developed erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (Los Angeles Classification Grade A) after eradication. Physiological studies showed he had abnormal esophageal motility prior to H. pylori eradication.

CONCLUSIONS

With the exception of gastric pH at night, most patients did not experience a significant change in gastric or esophageal function after H. pylori eradication. Development of GERD post H. pylori eradication likely reflects an increase in the acidity of the refluxate superimposed on pre-existing abnormalities in gastroesophageal motility.

Active and inactive gastroesophageal reflux diseases related to Helicobacter pylori therapy

We systematically reviewed the literature on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) related to Helicobacter pylori therapy, and classified the GERD according to various aspects. Preexisting GERD is active GERD before H. pylori therapy, and a substantial proportion of the GERD patients improve after successful H. pylori therapy. If the GERD does not persist or recur after cessation of acid-suppressive therapy combined with H. pylori therapy, it may have been cured (cured GERD). If it recurs, it may have been masked by acid-suppressive therapy and unmasked with cessation of the therapy (pharmacologically masked and unmasked GERD). Newly developed GERD after successful H. pylori therapy is a kind of unmasked GERD arising after cure of infection (de novo unmasked GERD). The possible mechanism of the improvement of cured GERD is normalized hyperacidity associated with an improved cytokine-somatostatin-gastrin system followed by normalized G-cell activity and parietal cell mass. Preexisting GERD is not a reason to avoid eradication therapy. De novo unmasked GERD develops in a substantial proportion of patients with cured infection. The possible mechanism is increased acid exposure in the esophagus due to gastric acid increase, which is caused by a loss of neutralizing effect by ammonia, normalized cytokine-acid suppression and improvement of corpus atrophy. De novo unmasked GERD is important because GERD is recurrent and may induce adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. However, it is expected that cure of infection lowers gastric cancer incidence. Eradication therapy is recommended irrespective of the possibility that de novo unmasked GERD may have a slight increase of the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects many patients and has a negative effect on quality of life. Along with the increasing prevalence of GERD is an increase in GERD-related complications, including Barrett esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. The past year has yielded new insights into the pathophysiology of GERD that can help us to better understand the relationship between reflux episodes and symptoms of mucosal damage and to provide a tailored treatment targeting individual pathophysiologic defects. The issues addressed in this report include gastric secretory and motor dysfunction; failure of the antireflux barrier caused by hiatal hernia and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations; characterization of the refluxate, particularly of nonacid reflux; prevalence and prognostic value of esophageal dysmotility in GERD; presence and eradication of Helicobacter pylori; Barrett esophagus and extraesophageal manifestations of GERD; and, finally, advances in medical, endoscopic, and surgical treatments of GERD.