Stimulation of NTS A1 adenosine receptors differentially resets baroreflex control of regional sympathetic outputs

Adenosine, lidocaine and Mg2+ update: teaching old drugs new tricks

If a trauma (or infection) exceeds the body's evolutionary design limits, a stress response is activated to quickly restore homeostasis. However, when the injury severity score is high, death is often imminent. The goal of this review is to provide an update on the effect of small-volume adenosine, lidocaine and Mg2+ (ALM) therapy on increasing survival and blunting secondary injury after non-compressible hemorrhagic shock and other trauma and infective/endotoxemic states. Two standout features of ALM therapy are: (1) resuscitation occurs at permissive hypotensive blood pressures (MAPs 50-60 mmHg), and (2) the drug confers neuroprotection at these low pressures. The therapy appears to reset the body's baroreflex to produce a high-flow, hypotensive, vasodilatory state with maintained tissue O2 delivery. Whole body ALM protection appears to be afforded by NO synthesis-dependent pathways and shifting central nervous system (CNS) control from sympathetic to parasympathetic dominance, resulting in improved cardiovascular function, reduced immune activation and inflammation, correction of coagulopathy, restoration of endothelial glycocalyx, and reduced energy demand and mitochondrial oxidative stress. Recently, independent studies have shown ALM may also be useful for stroke, muscle trauma, and as an adjunct to Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA). Ongoing studies have further shown ALM may have utility for burn polytrauma, damage control surgery and orthopedic surgery. Lastly, we discuss the clinical applications of ALM fluid therapy for prehospital and military far-forward use for non-compressible hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Regional Differences in Sympathetic Nerve Activity Are Generated by Multiple Arterial Baroreflex Loops Arranged in Parallel

In this review, by evaluating the responses during freezing, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and treadmill exercise, we discuss how multiple baroreflex loops arranged in parallel act on different organs to modulate sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in a region-specific and coordinated manner throughout the body. During freezing behaviors, arterial pressure (AP) remains unchanged, heart rate (HR) persistently decreases, renal SNA (RSNA) increases, and lumbar SNA (LSNA) remains unchanged. The baroreflex curve for RSNA shifts upward; that for LSNA remains unchanged; and that for HR shifts to the left. These region-specific changes in baroreflex curves are responsible for the region-specific changes in RSNA, LSNA, and HR during freezing. The decreased HR could allow the heart to conserve energy, which is offset by the increased RSNA caused by decreased vascular conductance, resulting in an unchanged AP. In contrast, the unchanged LSNA leaves the muscles in readiness for fight or flight. During REM sleep, AP increases, RSNA and HR decrease, while LSNA is elevated. The baroreflex curve for RSNA during REM sleep is vertically compressed in comparison with that during non-REM sleep. Cerebral blood flow is elevated while cardiac output is decreased during REM sleep. To address this situation, the brain activates the LSNA selectively, causing muscle vasoconstriction, which overcomes vasodilation of the kidneys as a result of the decreased RSNA and cardiac output. Accordingly, AP can be maintained during REM sleep. During treadmill exercise, AP, HR, and RSNA increase simultaneously. The baroreflex curve for RSNA shifts right-upward with the increased feedback gain, allowing maintenance of a stable AP with significant fluctuations in the vascular conductance of working muscles. Thus, the central nervous system may employ behavior-specific scenarios for modulating baroreflex loops for differential control of SNA, changing the SNA in a region-specific and coordinated manner, and then optimizing circulatory regulation corresponding to different behaviors.

The Role of Nitric Oxide in the Efficacy of Adenosine, Lidocaine, and Magnesium Treatment for Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock in Rats

Background

Nitric oxide (NO) plays multiple roles regulating the central nervous, cardiovascular, and immune systems.

Objective

Our aim was to investigate the role of NO in the efficacy of hypertonic saline (7.5% sodium chloride [NaCl]) adenosine, lidocaine, and magnesium (ALM) to improve mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate following hemorrhagic shock.

Methods

One hundred one male Sprague-Dawley rats (mean [SD] weight = 425 [6] g) were randomly assigned to 20 groups (groups of 4–8 rats each). Hemorrhagic shock (MAP < 40 mm Hg) was induced by 20-minute pressure-controlled bleeding (∼40% blood volume), and the animal was left in shock (MAP = 35-40 mm Hg) for 60 minutes. The NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NAME was administered with a 0.3-mL bolus of different combinations of 7.5% NaCl ALM active ingredients and hemodynamic parameters were monitored for 60 minutes. A number of specific NOS and NO inhibitors were tested.

Results

We found that 7.5% NaCl ALM corrected MAP after hemorrhagic shock. In contrast, the addition of L-NAME to 7.5% NaCl ALM led to a rapid fall in MAP, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and 100% mortality. Saline controls receiving 7.5% NaCl with N^G-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) showed improved MAP with no deaths. None of the specific NOS and NO inhibitors mimicked L-NAME's effect on ALM. The addition of inducible NOS inhibitor 1400W to 7.5% NaCl ALM failed to resuscitate, whereas the NO scavenger PTIO and the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin reduced MAP recovery during 60-minute resuscitation.

Conclusions

The ability of 7.5% NaCl ALM to resuscitate appears to be linked to 1 or more NO-producing pathways. Nonspecific NOS inhibition with L-NAME blocked ALM resuscitation and led to cardiovascular collapse. More studies are required to examine NO site-specific contributions to ALM resuscitation. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022; 82:XXX–XXX)

Differential shifts in baroreflex control of renal and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity induced by freezing behaviour in rats

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? Is the arterial baroreflex involved in causing patterned, region-specific changes in sympathetic nerve activity during freezing behaviour in conscious rats? What is the main finding and its importance? Freezing behaviour is accompanied by differential shifts in the baroreflex control of renal and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity and heart rate. It is noteworthy that baroreflex pathways may be discretely separated, allowing differential modification of baroreflex curves that may generate differential changes in sympathetic nerve activity during freezing behaviour.

ABSTRACT

The present study was designed to test whether the baroreflex stimulus-response curves for renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), lumbar sympathetic nerve activity (LSNA) and heart rate (HR) were shifted in a regionally specific manner during freezing behaviour in conscious rats. Male Wistar rats were chronically instrumented with electrodes and arterial and venous catheters for measurement of RSNA, LSNA and electrocardiogram. After a 60-min control period, freezing behaviour in conscious rats was induced by exposure to loud white noise (90 dB) for 10 min. The baroreflex curves for RSNA, LSNA and HR were generated by changing systemic arterial pressure using rapid intravenous infusions of vasoactive drugs and then fitted to an inverse sigmoid function curve. During the freezing behaviour, the baroreflex curve for RSNA was expanded upward with a significant (P < 0.001) increase (by 153% compared with the control level) in the upper plateau (maximum capacity of RSNA drive), whereas the baroreflex curve for LSNA remained unchanged. Conversely, the baroreflex curve for HR was shifted leftward with a significant (P = 0.004) decrease (by 11 mmHg relative to the control level) in the midpoint pressure. Our results indicate that baroreflex curve shifts for RSNA, LSNA and HR occur in a regionally specific manner during freezing behaviour. This indicates that baroreflex pathways may be discretely separated, allowing differential modification of baroreflex curves that may generate differential changes in sympathetic nerve activity during freezing behaviour.

Colocalization of A2a but not A1 adenosine receptors with GABA-ergic neurons in cardiopulmonary chemoreflex network in the caudal nucleus of the solitary tract

Adenosine operating in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) may inhibit or facilitate neurotransmitter release from nerve terminals and directly inhibit or facilitate central neurons via A1 and A2a pre- and postsynaptic receptors, respectively. However, adenosine A2a receptors, may also activate GABA-ergic neurons/terminals which in turn inhibit glutamatergic transmission in the NTS network. Our previous studies showed that adenosine operating via both A1 (inhibitor) and A2a (activator) receptors powerfully inhibits the cardiopulmonary chemoreflex (CCR) at the level of the caudal NTS. A1 receptors most likely inhibit glutamate release in the CCR network, whereas A2a receptors facilitate NTS GABA-ergic mechanisms which in turn inhibit CCR glutamatergic transmission. Therefore, we hypothesized that A2a receptors are located on NTS GABA-ergic neurons/terminals whereas A1 receptors may be located on NTS glutamatergic neurons/terminals. We investigated this hypothesis using double immunofluorescent staining for A2a or A1 adenosine receptors and GABA synthesizing enzyme, GAD67, in 30 μm thick, floating, medullary rat sections. We found that A2a adenosine receptors are localized within the GABA-ergic cells in the caudal NTS, whereas A1 adenosine receptors are absent from these neurons. Instead, A1 receptors were located on non-GABA-ergic (likely glutamatergic) neurons/terminals in the caudal NTS. These data support our functional findings and the hypothesis that adenosine A2a, but not A1 receptors are located on GABA-ergic neurons.

Sedentary conditions and enhanced responses to GABA in the RVLM: role of the contralateral RVLM

A sedentary lifestyle is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and both conditions are associated with overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system. Ongoing discharge of sympathetic nerves is regulated by the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM), which in turn is modulated by the primary excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters glutamate and γ-amino-butyric acid (GABA), respectively. We reported previously that sedentary conditions enhance GABAergic modulation of sympathoexcitation in the RVLM, despite overall increased sympathoexcitation. Thus the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that sedentary conditions increase responsiveness to GABA in RVLM. Male Sprague-Dawley rats performed either chronic wheeling running or remained sedentary for 12-15 wk. Animals were instrumented to perform RVLM microinjections under Inactin anesthesia while mean arterial pressure (MAP) and splanchnic sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA) were recorded. Unilateral microinjections of GABA (30 nl, 0.3-600 mM) into the RVLM produced dose-dependent decreases in MAP and SSNA; however, no group differences were observed. Inhibition of the contralateral RVLM (muscimol, 2 mM, 90 nl) caused decreases in MAP and SSNA that were not different between groups but enhanced decreases in SSNA to GABA in sedentary rats only. In sinoaortic denervated rats, GABA microinjections before or after inhibition of the contralateral RVLM caused decreases in MAP and SSNA that were not different between groups. Our results suggest that the contralateral RVLM plays an important role in buffering responses to inhibition of the ipsilateral RVLM under sedentary but not physically active conditions. Based on these studies and others, sedentary conditions appear to enhance both sympathoinhibitory and sympathoexcitatory mechanisms in the RVLM. Enhanced sympathoinhibition may act to reduce already elevated sympathetic nervous system activity following sedentary conditions.

NTS adenosine A2a receptors inhibit the cardiopulmonary chemoreflex control of regional sympathetic outputs via a GABAergic mechanism

Adenosine is a powerful central neuromodulator acting via opposing A1 (inhibitor) and A2a (activator) receptors. However, in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), both adenosine receptor subtypes attenuate cardiopulmonary chemoreflex (CCR) sympathoinhibition of renal, adrenal, and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity and attenuate reflex decreases in arterial pressure and heart rate. Adenosine A1 receptors inhibit glutamatergic transmission in the CCR pathway, whereas adenosine A2a receptors most likely facilitate release of an unknown inhibitory neurotransmitter, which, in turn, inhibits the CCR. We hypothesized that adenosine A2a receptors inhibit the CCR via facilitation of GABA release in the NTS. In urethane-chloralose-anesthetized rats (n = 51), we compared regional sympathetic responses evoked by stimulation of the CCR with right atrial injections of the 5-HT3 receptor agonist phenylbiguanide (1-8 μg/kg) before and after selective stimulation of NTS adenosine A2a receptors [microinjections into the NTS of CGS-21680 (20 pmol/50 nl)] preceded by blockade of GABAA or GABAB receptors in the NTS [bicuculline (10 pmol/100 nl) or SCH-50911 (1 nmol/100 nl)]. Blockade of GABAA receptors virtually abolished adenosine A2a receptor-mediated inhibition of the CCR. GABAB receptors had much weaker but significant effects. These effects were similar for the different sympathetic outputs. We conclude that stimulation of NTS adenosine A2a receptors inhibits CCR-evoked hemodynamic and regional sympathetic reflex responses via a GABA-ergic mechanism.

Severe hemorrhage attenuates cardiopulmonary chemoreflex control of regional sympathetic outputs via NTS adenosine receptors

Selective stimulation of inhibitory A1 and facilitatory A2a adenosine receptor subtypes located in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) powerfully inhibits cardiopulmonary chemoreflex (CCR) control of regional sympathetic outputs via different mechanisms: direct inhibition of glutamate release and facilitation of an inhibitory neurotransmitter release, respectively. However, it remains unknown whether adenosine naturally released into the NTS has similar inhibitory effects on the CCR as the exogenous agonists do. Our previous study showed that adenosine is released into the NTS during severe hemorrhage and contributes to reciprocal changes of renal (decreases) and adrenal (increases) sympathetic nerve activity observed in this setting. Both A1 and A2a adenosine receptors are involved. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that, during severe hemorrhage, CCR control of the two sympathetic outputs is attenuated by adenosine naturally released into the NTS. We compared renal and adrenal sympathoinhibitory responses evoked by right atrial injections of 5HT3 receptor agonist phenylbiguanide (2-8 μg/kg) under control conditions, during hemorrhage, and during hemorrhage preceded by blockade of NTS adenosine receptors with bilateral microinjections of 8-(p-sulfophenyl) theophylline (1 nmol/100 nl) in urethane/chloralose anesthetized rats. CCR-mediated inhibition of renal and adrenal sympathetic activity was significantly attenuated during severe hemorrhage despite reciprocal changes in the baseline activity levels, and this attenuation was removed by bilateral blockade of adenosine receptors in the caudal NTS. This confirmed that adenosine endogenously released into the NTS has a similar modulatory effect on integration of cardiovascular reflexes as stimulation of NTS adenosine receptors with exogenous agonists.

Central activation of the A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) induces a hypothermic, torpor-like state in the rat

Since central activation of A1 adenosine receptors (A1ARs) plays an important role in the induction of the hypothermic and hypometabolic torpid state in hibernating mammals, we investigated the potential for the A1AR agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine to induce a hypothermic, torpor-like state in the (nonhibernating) rat. Core and brown adipose tissue temperatures, EEG, heart rate, and arterial pressure were recorded in free-behaving rats, and c-fos expression in the brain was analyzed, following central administration of N6-cyclohexyladenosine. Additionally, we recorded the sympathetic nerve activity to brown adipose tissue; expiratory CO2 and skin, core, and brown adipose tissue temperatures; and shivering EMGs in anesthetized rats following central and localized, nucleus of the solitary tract, administration of N6-cyclohexyladenosine. In rats exposed to a cool (15°C) ambient temperature, central A1AR stimulation produced a torpor-like state similar to that in hibernating species and characterized by a marked fall in body temperature due to an inhibition of brown adipose tissue and shivering thermogenesis that is mediated by neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract. During the induced hypothermia, EEG amplitude and heart rate were markedly reduced. Skipped heartbeats and transient bradycardias occurring during the hypothermia were vagally mediated since they were eliminated by systemic muscarinic receptor blockade. These findings demonstrate that a deeply hypothermic, torpor-like state can be pharmacologically induced in a nonhibernating mammal and that recovery of normothermic homeostasis ensues upon rewarming. These results support the potential for central activation of A1ARs to be used in the induction of a hypothermic, therapeutically beneficial state in humans.

Nucleus tractus solitarii A(2a) adenosine receptors inhibit cardiopulmonary chemoreflex control of sympathetic outputs

Previously we have shown that stimulation of inhibitory A1 adenosine receptors located in the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) attenuates cardiopulmonary chemoreflex (CCR) evoked inhibition of renal, adrenal and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity and reflex decreases in arterial pressure and heart rate. Activation of facilitatory A2a adenosine receptors, which dominate over A1 receptors in the NTS, contrastingly alters baseline activity of regional sympathetic outputs: it decreases renal, increases adrenal and does not change lumbar nerve activity. Considering that NTS A2a receptors may facilitate release of inhibitory transmitters we hypothesized that A2a receptors will act in concert with A1 receptors differentially inhibiting regional sympathetic CCR responses (adrenal>lumbar>renal). In urethane/chloralose anesthetized rats (n=38) we compared regional sympathetic responses evoked by stimulation of the CCR with right atrial injections of serotonin 5HT3 receptor agonist, phenylbiguanide, (1-8μg/kg) before and after selective stimulation, blockade or combined blockade and stimulation of NTS A2a adenosine receptors (microinjections into the NTS of CGS-21680 0.2-20pmol/50nl, ZM-241385 40pmol/100nl or ZM-241385+CGS-21680, respectively). We found that stimulation of A2a adenosine receptors uniformly inhibited the regional sympathetic and hemodynamic reflex responses and this effect was abolished by the selective blockade of NTS A2a receptors. This indicates that A2a receptor triggered inhibition of CCR responses and the contrasting shifts in baseline sympathetic activity are mediated via different mechanisms. These data implicate that stimulation of NTS A2a receptors triggers unknown inhibitory mechanism(s) which in turn inhibit transmission in the CCR pathway when adenosine is released into the NTS during severe hypotension.

Activation of NTS A(1) adenosine receptors inhibits regional sympathetic responses evoked by activation of cardiopulmonary chemoreflex

Previously we have shown that adenosine operating via the A(1) receptor subtype may inhibit glutamatergic transmission in the baroreflex arc within the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) and differentially increase renal (RSNA), preganglionic adrenal (pre-ASNA), and lumbar (LSNA) sympathetic nerve activity (ASNA>RSNA≥LSNA). Since the cardiopulmonary chemoreflex and the arterial baroreflex are mediated via similar medullary pathways, and glutamate is a primary transmitter in both pathways, it is likely that adenosine operating via A(1) receptors in the NTS may differentially inhibit regional sympathetic responses evoked by activation of cardiopulmonary chemoreceptors. Therefore, in urethane-chloralose-anesthetized rats (n = 37) we compared regional sympathoinhibition evoked by the cardiopulmonary chemoreflex (activated with right atrial injections of serotonin 5HT(3) receptor agonist phenylbiguanide, PBG, 1-8 μg/kg) before and after selective stimulation of NTS A(1) adenosine receptors [microinjections of N(6)-cyclopentyl adenosine (CPA), 0.033-330 pmol/50 nl]. Activation of cardiopulmonary chemoreceptors evoked differential, dose-dependent sympathoinhibition (RSNA>ASNA>LSNA), and decreases in arterial pressure and heart rate. These differential sympathetic responses were uniformly attenuated in dose-dependent manner by microinjections of CPA into the NTS. Volume control (n = 11) and blockade of adenosine receptor subtypes in the NTS via 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (8-SPT, 1 nmol in 100 nl) (n = 9) did not affect the reflex responses. We conclude that activation of NTS A(1) adenosine receptors uniformly inhibits neural and cardiovascular cardiopulmonary chemoreflex responses. A(1) adenosine receptors have no tonic modulatory effect on this reflex under normal conditions. However, when adenosine is released into the NTS (i.e., during stress or severe hypotension/ischemia), it may serve as negative feedback regulator for depressor and sympathoinhibitory reflexes integrated in the NTS.

Role of adenosine A2A receptor signaling in the nicotine-evoked attenuation of reflex cardiac sympathetic control

Baroreflex dysfunction contributes to increased cardiovascular risk in cigarette smokers. Given the importance of adenosinergic pathways in baroreflex control, the hypothesis was tested that defective central adenosinergic modulation of cardiac autonomic activity mediates the nicotine-baroreflex interaction. Baroreflex curves relating changes in heart rate (HR) to increases or decreases in blood pressure (BP) evoked by i.v. doses (1-16μg/kg) of phenylephrine (PE) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP), respectively, were constructed in conscious rats; slopes of the curves were taken as measures of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). Nicotine (25 and 100μg/kg i.v.) dose-dependently reduced BRS(SNP) in contrast to no effect on BRS(PE). BRS(SNP) was also attenuated after intracisternal (i.c.) administration of nicotine. Similar reductions in BRS(SNP) were observed in rats pretreated with atropine or propranolol. The combined treatment with nicotine and atropine produced additive inhibitory effects on BRS, an effect that was not demonstrated upon concurrent exposure to nicotine and propranolol. BRS(SNP) was reduced in preparations treated with i.c. 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT, nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist), 8-(3-Chlorostyryl) caffeine (CSC, A(2A) antagonist), or VUF5574 (A(3) antagonist). In contrast, BRS(SNP) was preserved after blockade of A(1) (DPCPX) or A(2B) (alloxazine) receptors or inhibition of adenosine uptake by dipyridamole. CSC or 8-PT abrogated the BRS(SNP) depressant effect of nicotine whereas other adenosinergic antagonists were without effect. Together, nicotine preferentially impairs reflex tachycardia via disruption of adenosine A(2A) receptor-mediated facilitation of reflex cardiac sympathoexcitation. Clinically, the attenuation by nicotine of compensatory sympathoexcitation may be detrimental in conditions such as hypothalamic defense response, posture changes, and ventricular rhythms.

Differential activation of adrenal, renal, and lumbar sympathetic nerves following stimulation of the rostral ventrolateral medulla of the rat

Under acute and chronic conditions, the sympathetic nervous system can be activated in a differential and even selective manner. Activation of the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) has been implicated in differential control of sympathetic outputs based on evidence primarily in the cat. Although several studies indicate that differential control of sympathetic outflow occurs in other species, only a few studies have addressed whether the RVLM is capable of producing varying patterns of sympathetic activation in the rat. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine whether activation of the RVLM results in simultaneous and differential increases in preganglionic adrenal (pre-ASNA), renal (RSNA), and lumbar (LSNA) sympathetic nerve activities. In urethane-chloralose anesthetized rats, pre-ASNA, RSNA, and LSNA were recorded simultaneously in all animals. Microinjections of selected concentrations and volumes of glutamate increased pre-ASNA, RSNA, and LSNA concurrently and differentially. Pre-ASNA and RSNA (in most cases) exhibited greater increases compared with LSNA on a percentage basis. By varying the volume or location of the glutamate microinjections, we also identified individual examples of differential and selective activation of these nerves. Decreases in arterial pressure or bilateral blockade of RVLM GABA(A) receptors also revealed differential activation, with the latter having a 3- to 4-fold greater effect on sympathetic activity. Our data provide evidence that activation of the rat RVLM increases renal, lumbar, and preganglionic adrenal sympathetic nerve activities concurrently, differentially, and, in some cases, selectively.

Neural and humoral control of regional vascular beds via A1 adenosine receptors located in the nucleus tractus solitarii

Our previous studies showed that stimulation of adenosine A(1) receptors located in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) exerts counteracting effects on the iliac vascular bed: activation of the adrenal medulla and β-adrenergic vasodilation vs. sympathetic and vasopressinergic vasoconstriction. Because NTS A(1) adenosine receptors inhibit baroreflex transmission in the NTS and contribute to the pressor component of the HDR, we hypothesized that these receptors also contribute to the redistribution of blood from the visceral to the muscle vasculature via prevailing sympathetic and vasopressinergic vasoconstriction in the visceral (renal and mesenteric) vascular beds and prevailing β-adrenergic vasodilation in the somatic (iliac) vasculature. To test this hypothesis, we compared the A(1) adenosine-receptor-mediated effects of each vasoactive factor triggered by NTS A(1) adenosine receptor stimulation [N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), 330 pmol in 50 nl] on the regional vascular responses in urethane/chloralose-anesthetized rats. The single-factor effects were separated using adrenalectomy, β-adrenergic blockade, V(1) vasopressin receptor blockade, and sinoaortic denervation. In intact animals, initial vasodilation was followed by large, sustained vasoconstriction with smaller responses observed in renal vs. mesenteric and iliac vascular beds. The initial β-adrenergic vasodilation prevailed in the iliac vs. mesenteric and renal vasculature. The large and sustained vasopressinergic vasoconstriction was similar in all vascular beds. Small sympathetic vasoconstriction was observed only in the iliac vasculature in this setting. We conclude that, although A(1) adenosine-receptor-mediated β-adrenergic vasodilation may contribute to the redistribution of blood from the visceral to the muscle vasculature, this effect is overridden by sympathetic and vasopressinergic vasoconstriction.

Differential control of renal and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity during freezing behavior in conscious rats

The present study was designed to document changes in sympathetic nerve activity and cardiovascular function when conscious rats were challenged with a noise stressor to induce freezing behavior. The potential contribution of the arterial baroreceptors in regulating sympathetic nerve activity and cardiovascular adjustments during the freezing behavior was then examined. Wistar male rats were assigned to sham-operated (SO) and sinoaortic-denervated (SAD) groups and instrumented chronically with electrodes for measurements of renal (RSNA) and lumbar (LSNA) sympathetic nerve activity, electroencephalogram, electromyogram, and electrocardiogram and catheters for measurements of systemic arterial and central venous pressure. Both SO and SAD rats were exposed to 90 dB of white noise for 10 min, causing freezing behavior in both groups. In SO rats, freezing behavior was associated with an immediate and significant (P < 0.05) increase in RSNA, no changes in LSNA or mean arterial pressure, and a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in heart rate. SAD attenuated the magnitude of the immediate increase in RSNA and had no influence on the response in LSNA during freezing behavior compared with SO rats. Moreover, in SAD rats, mean arterial pressure increased significantly (P < 0.05) while heart rate did not change during the freezing behavior. These data indicate that freezing behavior evokes regionally different changes in sympathetic outflows, which may be involved in generating the patterned responses of cardiovascular function to stressful or threatening sensory stimulation. Moreover, it is suggested that the arterial baroreceptors are involved in generating the differential changes in RSNA and LSNA and thus the patterned changes in cardiovascular functions observed during freezing behavior in conscious rats.

Vasopressin is a major vasoconstrictor involved in hindlimb vascular responses to stimulation of adenosine A(1) receptors in the nucleus of the solitary tract

Our previous study showed that stimulation of adenosine A(1) receptors located in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) exerts counteracting effects on the iliac vascular bed: activation of the adrenal medulla and beta-adrenergic vasodilation versus vasoconstriction mediated by neural and unknown humoral factors. In the present study we investigated the relative contribution of three major potential humoral vasoconstrictors: vasopressin, angiotensin II, and norepinephrine in this response. In urethane-chloralose anesthetized rats we compared the integral changes in iliac vascular conductance evoked by microinjections into the NTS of the selective A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA; 330 pmol in 50 nl) in intact (Int) animals and following: V(1) vasopressin receptor blockade (VX), angiotensin II AT(1) receptor blockade (ATX), bilateral adrenalectomy + ganglionic blockade (ADX + GX; which eliminated the potential increases in circulating norepinephrine and epinephrine), ADX + GX + VX and ADX + GX + VX + ATX. In Int animals, stimulation of NTS A(1) adenosine receptors evoked typical variable responses with prevailing pressor and vasoconstrictor effects. VX reversed the responses to depressor ones. ATX did not significantly alter the responses. ADX + GX accentuated pressor and vasoconstrictor responses, whereas ADX + GX + VX and ADX + GX + VX + ATX virtually abolished the responses. Stimulation of NTS A(1) adenosine receptors increased circulating vasopressin over fourfold (26.4 + or - 10.4 vs. 117.0 + or - 19 pg/ml). These data strongly suggest that vasopressin is a major vasoconstrictor factor opposing beta-adrenergic vasodilation in iliac vascular responses triggered by stimulation of NTS A(1) adenosine receptors, whereas angiotensin II and norepinephrine do not contribute significantly to the vasoconstrictor responses.

Centrally evoked increase in adrenal sympathetic outflow elicits immediate secretion of adrenaline in anaesthetized rats

To examine whether feedforward control by central command activates preganglionic adrenal sympathetic nerve activity (AdSNA) and releases catecholamines from the adrenal medulla, we investigated the effects of electrical stimulation of the hypothalamic locomotor region on preganglionic AdSNA and secretion rate of adrenal catecholamines in anaesthetized rats. Pre- or postganglionic AdSNA was verified by temporary sympathetic ganglionic blockade with trimethaphan. Adrenal venous blood was collected every 30 s to determine adrenal catecholamine output and blood flow. Hypothalamic stimulation for 30 s (50 Hz, 100-200 microA) induced rapid activation of preganglionic AdSNA by 83-181% depending on current intensity, which was followed by an immediate increase of 123-233% in adrenal adrenaline output. Hypothalamic stimulation also increased postganglionic AdSNA by 42-113% and renal sympathetic nerve activity by 94-171%. Hypothalamic stimulation induced preferential secretion of adrenal adrenaline compared with noradrenaline, because the ratio of adrenaline to noradrenaline increased greatly during hypothalamic stimulation. As soon as the hypothalamic stimulation was terminated, preganglionic AdSNA returned to the prestimulation level in a few seconds, and the elevated catecholamine output decayed within 30-60 s. Adrenal blood flow and vascular resistance were not affected or slightly decreased by hypothalamic stimulation. Thus, it is likely that feedforward control of catecholamine secretion from the adrenal medulla plays a role in conducting rapid hormonal control of the cardiovascular system at the beginning of exercise.

Role of differential changes in sympathetic nerve activity in the preparatory adjustments of cardiovascular functions during freezing behaviour in rats

Freezing behaviour is associated with a distinct pattern of changes in cardiovascular function, which has been considered as a preparatory reflex for 'fight or flight' behaviour. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying preparatory cardiovascular adjustments and their physiological implications have received less attention. We studied responses in renal and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity and cardiovascular function during freezing behaviour in conscious rats, which was induced by exposure to loud white noise. Freezing behaviour was associated with regionally specific alterations in sympathetic nerve activity, in that renal sympathetic nerve activity increased while lumbar sympathetic nerve activity did not change. Moreover, freezing behaviour was associated with differential shifts in baroreflex control of sympathetic outflows, which could help to explain the selective responses in renal and lumbar sympathetic nerve activity during freezing behaviour. These differential changes in sympathetic outflows would result in a visceral vasoconstriction without having any impact on the skeletal muscle vasculature. These cardiovascular adjustments during freezing behaviour may help to explain the immediate and massive increase in muscular blood flow that occurs at the onset of fight or flight behaviour. It is hypothesized that central command originating from the defence area could somehow modulate separate baroreflex pathways, causing differential changes in sympathetic nerve activity to generate the preparatory cardiovascular adjustments during the freezing behaviour.

Activation of NTS A2a adenosine receptors differentially resets baroreflex control of renal vs. adrenal sympathetic nerve activity

The role of nucleus of solitary tract (NTS) A(2a) adenosine receptors in baroreflex mechanisms is controversial. Stimulation of these receptors releases glutamate within the NTS and elicits baroreflex-like decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA), whereas inhibition of these receptors attenuates HR baroreflex responses. In contrast, stimulation of NTS A(2a) adenosine receptors increases preganglionic adrenal sympathetic nerve activity (pre-ASNA), and the depressor and sympathoinhibitory responses are not markedly affected by sinoaortic denervation and blockade of NTS glutamatergic transmission. To elucidate the role of NTS A(2a) adenosine receptors in baroreflex function, we compared full baroreflex stimulus-response curves for HR, RSNA, and pre-ASNA (intravenous nitroprusside/phenylephrine) before and after bilateral NTS microinjections of selective adenosine A(2a) receptor agonist (CGS-21680; 2.0, 20 pmol/50 nl), selective A(2a) receptor antagonist (ZM-241385; 40 pmol/100 nl), and nonselective A(1) + A(2a) receptor antagonist (8-SPT; 1 nmol/100 nl) in urethane/alpha-chloralose anesthetized rats. Activation of A(2a) receptors decreased the range, upper plateau, and gain of baroreflex-response curves for RSNA, whereas these parameters all increased for pre-ASNA, consistent with direct effects of the agonist on regional sympathetic activity. However, no resetting of baroreflex-response curves along the MAP axis occurred despite the marked decreases in baseline MAP. The antagonists had no marked effects on baseline variables or baroreflex-response functions. We conclude that the activation of NTS A(2a) adenosine receptors differentially alters baroreflex control of HR, RSNA, and pre-ASNA mostly via non-baroreflex mechanism(s), and these receptors have virtually no tonic action on baroreflex control of these sympathetic outputs.

Baroreflex control of lumbar and renal sympathetic nerve activity in conscious rats

This study compared the baroreflex control of lumbar and renal sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in conscious rats. Arterial pressure (AP) and lumbar and renal SNA were simultaneously recorded in six freely behaving rats. Pharmacological estimates of lumbar and renal sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) were obtained by means of the sequential intravenous administration of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine. Sympathetic BRS was significantly ( P < 0.05) lower for lumbar [3.0 ± 0.4 normalized units (NU)/mmHg] than for renal (7.6 ± 0.6 NU/mmHg) SNA. During a 219-min baseline period, spontaneous lumbar and renal BRS were continuously assessed by computing the gain of the transfer function relating AP and SNA at heart rate frequency over consecutive 61.4-s periods. The transfer gain was considered only when coherence between AP and SNA significantly differed from zero, which was verified in 99 ± 1 and 96 ± 3% of cases for lumbar and renal SNA, respectively. When averaged over the entire baseline period, spontaneous BRS was significantly ( P < 0.05) lower for lumbar (1.3 ± 0.2 NU/mmHg) than for renal (2.3 ± 0.3 NU/mmHg) SNA. For both SNAs, spontaneous BRS showed marked fluctuations (variation coefficients were 26 ± 2 and 28 ± 2% for lumbar and renal SNA, respectively). These fluctuations were positively correlated in five of six rats ( R = 0.44 ± 0.06; n = 204 ± 8; P < 0.0001). We conclude that in conscious rats, the baroreflex control of lumbar and renal SNA shows quantitative differences but is modulated in a mostly coordinated way.