Rib cage muscle interaction in airway pressure generation

Neuromechanical matching of drive in the scalene muscle of the anesthetized rabbit

The scalene is a primary respiratory muscle in humans; however, in dogs, EMG activity recorded from this muscle during inspiration was reported to derive from underlying muscles. In the present studies, origin of the activity in the medial scalene was tested in rabbits, and its distribution was compared with the muscle mechanical advantage. We assessed in anesthetized rabbits the presence of EMG activity in the scalene, sternomastoid, and parasternal intercostal muscles during quiet breathing and under resistive loading, before and after denervation of the scalene and after its additional insulation. At rest, activity was always recorded in the parasternal muscle and in the scalene bundle inserting on the third rib (medial scalene). The majority of this activity disappeared after denervation. In the bundle inserting on the fifth rib (lateral scalene), the activity was inconsistent, and a high percentage of this activity persisted after denervation but disappeared after insulation from underlying muscle layers. The sternomastoid was always silent. The fractional change in muscle length during passive inflation was then measured. The mean shortening obtained for medial and lateral scalene and parasternal intercostal was 8.0 +/- 0.7%, 5.5 +/- 0.5%, and 9.6 +/- 0.1%, respectively, of the length at functional residual capacity. Sternomastoid muscle length did not change significantly with lung inflation. We conclude that, similar to that shown in humans, respiratory activity arises from scalene muscles in rabbits. This activity is however not uniformly distributed, and a neuromechanical matching of drive is observed, so that the most effective part is also the most active.

Effect of diaphragmatic contraction on the action of the canine parasternal intercostals

The inspiratory intercostal muscles enhance the force generated by the diaphragm during lung expansion. However, whether the diaphragm also alters the force developed by the inspiratory intercostals is unknown. Two experiments were performed in dogs to answer the question. In the first experiment, external, cranially oriented forces were applied to the different rib pairs to assess the effect of diaphragmatic contraction on the coupling between the ribs and the lung. The fall in airway opening pressure (ΔPao) produced by a given force on the ribs was invariably greater during phrenic nerve stimulation than with the diaphragm relaxed. The cranial rib displacement (Xr), however, was 40–50% smaller, thus indicating that the increase in ΔPao was exclusively the result of the increase in diaphragmatic elastance. In the second experiment, the parasternal intercostal muscle in the fourth interspace was selectively activated, and the effects of diaphragmatic contraction on the ΔPao and Xr caused by parasternal activation were compared with those observed during the application of external loads on the ribs. Stimulating the phrenic nerves increased the ΔPao and reduced the Xr produced by the parasternal intercostal, and the magnitudes of the changes were identical to those observed during external rib loading. It is concluded, therefore, that the diaphragm has no significant synergistic or antagonistic effect on the force developed by the parasternal intercostals during breathing. This lack of effect is probably related to the constraint imposed on intercostal muscle length by the ribs and sternum.

Respiratory muscle activity and respiratory obstruction after abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Respiratory movements in patients after abdominal surgery are frequently abnormal, with associated disturbances in the pattern of inspiratory pressure generation. The reasons for these abnormalities are not clear and have been attributed to impaired action of the diaphragm. However, an alternative is that partial airway obstruction could trigger reflex activation of the inspiratory ribcage muscles, which would cause a similar pattern of inspiratory pressure change. Direct measurement of electrical activity can indicate if reflex activation of inspiratory muscles occurs when partial airway obstruction is present.

METHODS

In an open study, we implanted electrodes to measure the EMG of scalene, intercostal and external oblique abdominal muscles in patients after lower abdominal surgery. Analgesia was with morphine i.v. by patient control. We used nasal cannulae to measure nasal airflow and compared EMG activity when airway obstruction was present with activity when breathing was not obstructed.

RESULTS

The pattern of activity of the different muscles was distinct. Intercostal activity reached a maximum during inspiration, before the scalene muscles, whereas scalene activity increased in phase with increasing lung volume. Abdominal muscle activity commenced when expiratory flow had ceased and continued until the next inspiration. In all three muscle groups, partial airway obstruction did not alter muscle activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial airway obstruction does not activate inspiratory ribcage muscles, in patients receiving morphine for postoperative analgesia after lower abdominal surgery. Changes in respiratory pressures and abnormalities of chest wall movement described in previous studies cannot be attributed to reflex responses and probably result from increased airway resistance and abdominal muscle action.

Effect of inflation on the interaction between the left and right hemidiaphragms

At resting end expiration [functional residual capacity (FRC)], the actions of the left and right hemidiaphragms on the lung are synergistic. However, the synergism decreases in magnitude as muscle tension decreases. Therefore, the hypothesis was tested in anesthetized dogs that the degree of synergism between the two hemidiaphragms also decreases with increasing lung volume. In a first experiment, the changes in airway opening pressure (ΔPao) and abdominal pressure (ΔPab) obtained during simultaneous stimulation of the left and right phrenic nerves (measured changes in pressure) at different lung volumes were compared with the sum of the pressure changes produced by their separate stimulation (predicted changes in pressure). Although the pressure changes decreased markedly with increasing lung volume, the measured ΔPao and ΔPab were substantially greater than the predicted values at all lung volumes. The ratio of the measured to the predicted ΔPao, in fact, remained constant. In a second experiment, radiographic measurements showed that the fractional shortening of the muscle during bilateral contraction at high lung volumes was similar to that during unilateral contraction. During unilateral contraction at high lung volumes, however, the passive hemidiaphragm moved in the cranial direction, whereas, during unilateral contraction at FRC, it moved in the caudal direction. These observations indicate that 1) for a given muscle tension, the synergism between the two halves of the diaphragm is greater at high lung volumes than at FRC; and 2) this difference is primarily related to the greater distortion of the muscle configuration.

Respiratory action of the intercostal muscles

The mechanical advantages of the external and internal intercostals depend partly on the orientation of the muscle but mostly on interspace number and the position of the muscle within each interspace. Thus the external intercostals in the dorsal portion of the rostral interspaces have a large inspiratory mechanical advantage, but this advantage decreases ventrally and caudally such that in the ventral portion of the caudal interspaces, it is reversed into an expiratory mechanical advantage. The internal interosseous intercostals in the caudal interspaces also have a large expiratory mechanical advantage, but this advantage decreases cranially and, for the upper interspaces, ventrally as well. The intercartilaginous portion of the internal intercostals (the so-called parasternal intercostals), therefore, has an inspiratory mechanical advantage, whereas the triangularis sterni has a large expiratory mechanical advantage. These rostrocaudal gradients result from the nonuniform coupling between rib displacement and lung expansion, and the dorsoventral gradients result from the three-dimensional configuration of the rib cage. Such topographic differences in mechanical advantage imply that the functions of the muscles during breathing are largely determined by the topographic distributions of neural drive. The distributions of inspiratory and expiratory activity among the muscles are strikingly similar to the distributions of inspiratory and expiratory mechanical advantages, respectively. As a result, the external intercostals and the parasternal intercostals have an inspiratory function during breathing, whereas the internal interosseous intercostals and the triangularis sterni have an expiratory function.

Interaction between the canine diaphragm and intercostal muscles in lung expansion

Changes in intrathoracic pressure produced by the various inspiratory intercostals are essentially additive, but the interaction between these muscles and the diaphragm remains uncertain. In the present study, this interaction was assessed by measuring the changes in airway opening (ΔPao) or transpulmonary pressure (ΔPtp) in vagotomized, phrenicotomized dogs during spontaneous inspiration (isolated intercostal contraction), during isolated rectangular or ramp stimulation of the peripheral ends of the transected C5 phrenic nerve roots (isolated diaphragm contraction), and during spontaneous inspiration with superimposed phrenic nerve stimulation (combined diaphragm-intercostal contraction). With the endotracheal tube occluded at functional residual capacity, ΔPao during combined diaphragm-intercostal contraction was nearly equal to the sum of the ΔPao produced by the two muscle groups contracting individually. However, when the endotracheal tube was kept open, ΔPtp during combined contraction was 123% of the sum of the individual ΔPtp ( P < 0.001). The increase in lung volume during combined contraction was also 109% of the sum of the individual volume increases ( P < 0.02). Abdominal pressure during combined contraction was invariably lower than during isolated diaphragm contraction. It is concluded, therefore, that the canine diaphragm and intercostal muscles act synergistically during lung expansion and that this synergism is primarily due to the fact that the intercostal muscles reduce shortening of the diaphragm. When the lung is maintained at functional residual capacity, however, the synergism is obscured because the greater stiffness of the rib cage during diaphragm contraction enhances the ΔPao produced by the isolated diaphragm and reduces the ΔPao produced by the intercostal muscles.

Synergism between the canine left and right hemidiaphragms

Expansion of the lung during inspiration results from the coordinated contraction of the diaphragm and several groups of rib cage muscles, and we have previously shown that the changes in intrathoracic pressure generated by the latter are essentially additive. In the present studies, we have assessed the interaction between the right and left hemidiaphragms in anesthetized dogs by comparing the changes in airway opening pressure (DeltaPao) obtained during simultaneous stimulation of the two phrenic nerves (measured DeltaPao) to the sum of the DeltaPao values produced by their separate stimulation (predicted DeltaPao). The measured DeltaPao was invariably greater than the predicted DeltaPao, and the ratio between these two values increased gradually as the stimulation frequency was increased; the ratio was 1.10 +/- 0.01 (P < 0.05) for a frequency of 10 Hz, whereas for a frequency of 50 Hz it amounted to 1.49 +/- 0.05 (P < 0.001). This interaction remained unchanged after the rib cage was stiffened and its compliance was made linear, thus indicating that the load against which the diaphragm works is not a major determinant. However, radiographic measurements showed that stimulation of one phrenic nerve extends the inactive hemidiaphragm toward the sagittal midplane and reduces the caudal displacement of the central portion of the diaphragmatic dome. As a result, the volume swept by the contracting hemidiaphragm is smaller than the volume it displaces when the contralateral hemidiaphragm also contracts. These observations indicate that 1) the left and right hemidiaphragms have a synergistic, rather than additive, interaction on the lung; 2) this synergism operates already during quiet breathing and increases in magnitude when respiratory drive is greater; and 3) this synergism is primarily related to the configuration of the muscle.

Respiratory effects of the scalene and sternomastoid muscles in humans

Previous studies have shown that in normal humans the change in airway opening pressure (DeltaPao) produced by all the parasternal and external intercostal muscles during a maximal contraction is approximately -18 cmH(2)O. This value is substantially less negative than DeltaPao values recorded during maximal static inspiratory efforts in subjects with complete diaphragmatic paralysis. In the present study, therefore, the respiratory effects of the two prominent inspiratory muscles of the neck, the sternomastoids and the scalenes, were evaluated by application of the Maxwell reciprocity theorem. Seven healthy subjects were placed in a computed tomographic scanner to determine the fractional changes in muscle length during inflation from functional residual capacity to total lung capacity and the masses of the muscles. Inflation induced greater shortening of the scalenes than the sternomastoids in every subject. The inspiratory mechanical advantage of the scalenes thus averaged (mean +/- SE) 3.4 +/- 0.4%/l, whereas that of the sternomastoids was 2.0 +/- 0.3%/l (P < 0.001). However, sternomastoid muscle mass was much larger than scalene muscle mass. As a result, DeltaPao generated by a maximal contraction of either muscle would be 3-4 cmH(2)O, which is about the same as DeltaPao generated by the parasternal intercostals in all interspaces.

On the respiratory function of the ribs

To assess the respiratory function of the ribs, we measured the changes in airway opening pressure (Pao) induced by stimulation of the parasternal and external intercostal muscles in anesthetized dogs, first before and then after the bony ribs were removed from both sides of the chest. Stimulating either set of muscles with the rib cage intact elicited a fall in Pao in all animals. After removal of the ribs, however, the fall in Pao produced by the parasternal intercostals was reduced by 60% and the fall produced by the external intercostals was eliminated. The normal outward curvature of the rib cage was also abolished in this condition, and when the curvature was restored by a small inflation, external intercostal stimulation consistently elicited a rise rather than a fall in Pao. These findings thus confirm that the ribs play a critical role in the act of breathing by converting intercostal muscle shortening into lung volume expansion. In addition, they carry the compression that is required to balance the pressure difference across the chest wall.

Variations in respiratory muscle activity during echolocation when stationary in three species of bat (Microchiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

Echolocating bats use respiratory muscles to power the production of biosonar vocalisations. The physical characteristics of these calls vary among species of bat, and variations also exist in the timing and patterns of respiratory muscle recruitment during echolocation. We recorded electromyograms from the respiratory muscles of three species of bat (Family Vespertilionidae) while the animals vocalised from stationary positions. Activity was recorded consistently from the lateral abdominal muscles (internal abdominal oblique and transversus abdominis) from all calling bats, but we found much variation within and among species. Bats in the family Vespertilionidae devoted longer periods of expiratory muscle activity to each call than did the mormoopid bat Pteronotus parnellii. These differences correlate negatively with the duration of calls. We suggest that morphological adaptations in some bats may facilitate the economic production of echolocation calls at rest.

Respiratory effects of the external and internal intercostal muscles in humans

The current conventional view of intercostal muscle actions is based on the theory of Hamberger (1749) and maintains that as a result of the orientation of the muscle fibres, the external intercostals have an inspiratory action on the lung and the internal interosseous intercostals have an expiratory action. Recent studies in dogs, however, have shown that this notion is only approximate. In the present studies, the respiratory actions of the human external and internal intercostal muscles were evaluated by applying the Maxwell reciprocity theorem. Thus the orientation of the muscle fibres relative to the ribs and the masses of the muscles were first assessed in cadavers. Five healthy individuals were then placed in a computed tomographic scanner to determine the geometry of the ribs and their precise transformation during passive inflation to total lung capacity. The fractional changes in length of lines with the orientation of the muscle fibres were then computed to obtain the mechanical advantages of the muscles. These values were finally multiplied by muscle mass and maximum active stress (3.0 kg cm-2) to evaluate the potential effects of the muscles on the lung. The external intercostal in the dorsal half of the second interspace was found to have a large inspiratory effect. However, this effect decreases rapidly in the caudal direction, in particular in the ventral portion of the ribcage. As a result, it is reversed into an expiratory effect in the ventral half of the sixth and eighth interspaces. The internal intercostals in the ventral half of the sixth and eighth interspaces have a large expiratory effect, but this effect decreases dorsally and cranially. The total pressure generated by all the external intercostals during a maximum contraction would be -15 cmH2O, and that generated by all the internal interosseous intercostals would be +40 cmH2O. These pressure changes are substantially greater than those induced by the parasternal intercostal and triangularis sterni muscles, respectively.

Interaction between left and right intercostal muscles in airway pressure generation

The interactions between the different rib cage inspiratory muscles in the generation of pleural pressure remain largely unknown. In the present study, we have assessed in dogs the interactions between the parasternal intercostals and the interosseous intercostals situated on the right and left sides of the sternum. For each set of muscles, the changes in airway opening pressure (DeltaPao) obtained during separate right and left activation were added, and the calculated values (predicted DeltaPao) were then compared with the DeltaPao values obtained during symmetric, bilateral activation (measured DeltaPao). When the parasternal intercostals in one or two interspaces were activated, the measured DeltaPao was commonly greater than the predicted value. The difference, however, was only 10%. When the interosseous intercostals were activated, the measured DeltaPao was nearly equal to the predicted value. These observations strengthen our previous conclusion that the pressure changes produced by the rib cage inspiratory muscles are essentially additive. As a corollary, the rib cage can be considered as a linear elastic structure over a wide range of distortion.

Muscle kinematics for minimal work of breathing

A mathematical model was analyzed to obtain a quantitative and testable representation of the long-standing hypothesis that the respiratory muscles drive the chest wall along the trajectory for which the work of breathing is minimal. The respiratory system was modeled as a linear elastic system that can be expanded either by pressure applied at the airway opening (passive inflation) or by active forces in respiratory muscles (active inflation). The work of active expansion was calculated, and the distribution of muscle forces that produces a given lung expansion with minimal work was computed. The calculated expression for muscle force is complicated, but the corresponding kinematics of muscle shortening is simple: active inspiratory muscles shorten more during active inflation than during passive inflation, and the ratio of active to passive shortening is the same for all active muscles. In addition, the ratio of the minimal work done by respiratory muscles during active inflation to work required for passive inflation is the same as the ratio of active to passive muscle shortening. The minimal-work hypothesis was tested by measurement of the passive and active shortening of the internal intercostal muscles in the parasternal region of two interspaces in five supine anesthetized dogs. Fractional changes in muscle length were measured by sonomicrometry during passive inflation, during quiet breathing, and during forceful inspiratory efforts against a closed airway. Active muscle shortening during quiet breathing was, on average, 70% greater than passive shortening, but it was only weakly correlated with passive shortening. Active shortening inferred from the data for more forceful inspiratory efforts was approximately 40% greater than passive shortening and was highly correlated with passive shortening. These data support the hypothesis that, during forceful inspiratory efforts, muscle activation is coordinated so as to expand the chest wall with minimal work.

Spatial distribution of external and internal intercostal activity in dogs

1. The observation that the external and internal interosseous intercostal muscles in the dog show marked regional differences in mechanical advantage has prompted us to re-examine the topographic distribution of electrical activity among these muscles during spontaneous breathing. 2. Inspiratory activity was recorded only from the areas of the external intercostals with an inspiratory mechanical advantage, and expiratory activity was recorded only from the areas of the internal intercostals with an expiratory mechanical advantage. The expiratory discharges previously recorded from the caudal external intercostals and the inspiratory discharges recorded from the rostral internal intercostals were probably due to cross-contamination. 3. Activity in each muscle area was also quantified relative to the activity measured during tetanic, supramaximal nerve stimulation (maximal activity). External intercostal inspiratory activity was consistently greater in the areas with a greater inspiratory advantage (i.e. the dorsal aspect of the rostral segments) than in the areas with a smaller inspiratory advantage, and internal intercostal expiratory activity was invariably greatest in the areas with the greatest expiratory advantage (i.e. the dorsal aspect of the caudal segments). 4. This topographic distribution of neural drive confers to the external intercostal muscles an inspiratory action on the lung during breathing and to the internal interosseous intercostals an expiratory action.

Respiratory mechanical advantage of the canine external and internal intercostal muscles

1. The current conventional view of intercostal muscle actions is based on the theory of Hamberger (1749) and maintains that as a result of the orientation of the muscle fibres, the external intercostals have an inspiratory action on the lung and the internal interosseous intercostals have an expiratory action. This notion, however, remains unproved. 2. In the present studies, the respiratory actions of the canine external and internal intercostal muscles were evaluated by applying the Maxwell reciprocity theorem. Thus the effects of passive inflation on the changes in length of the muscles throughout the rib cage were assessed, and the distributions of muscle mass were determined. The fractional changes in muscle length during inflation were then multiplied by muscle mass and maximum active stress (3.0 kg cm-2) to evaluate the potential effects of the muscles on the lung. 3. The external intercostals in the dorsal third of the rostral interspaces were found to have a large inspiratory effect. However, this effect decreases rapidly both toward the costochondral junctions and toward the base of the rib cage. As a result, it is reversed to an expiratory effect in the most caudal interspaces. The internal intercostals in the caudal interspaces have a large expiratory effect, but this effect decreases ventrally and rostrally, such that it is reversed to an inspiratory effect in the most rostral interspaces. 4. These observations indicate that the canine external and internal intercostal muscles do not have distinct inspiratory and expiratory actions as conventionally thought. Therefore, their effects on the lung during breathing will be determined by the topographic distribution of neural drive.

Mechanical advantage of the human parasternal intercostal and triangularis sterni muscles

1. Previous studies in dogs have demonstrated that the maximum change in airway pressure (DeltaPao) produced by a particular respiratory muscle is the product of three factors, namely the mass of the muscle, the maximal active muscle tension per unit cross-sectional area ( approximately 3.0 kg cm-2), and the fractional change in muscle length per unit volume increase of the relaxed chest wall (i.e. the muscle's mechanical advantage). In the present studies, we have used this principle to infer the DeltaPao values generated by the parasternal intercostal and triangularis sterni muscles in man. 2. The mass of the muscles and the direction of the muscle fibres relative to the sternum were first assessed in six cadavers. Seven healthy individuals were then placed in a computed tomographic scanner to determine the orientation of the costal cartilages relative to the sternum and their rotation during passive inflation to total lung capacity. The fractional changes in length of the muscles during inflation, their mechanical advantages, and their DeltaPao values were then calculated. 3. Passive inflation induced shortening of the parasternal intercostals in all interspaces and lengthening of the triangularis sterni. The fractional shortening of the parasternal intercostals decreased gradually from 7.7 % in the second interspace to 2.0 % in the fifth, whereas the fractional lengthening of the triangularis sterni increased progressively from 5.9 to 13.8 %. These rostrocaudal gradients were well accounted for by the more caudal orientation of the cartilages of the lower ribs. 4. Since these fractional changes in length corresponded to a maximal inflation, the inspiratory mechanical advantage of the parasternal intercostals was only 2.2-0. 6 % l-1, and the expiratory mechanical advantage of the triangularis sterni was only 1.6-3.8 % l-1. In addition, whatever the interspace, parasternal and triangularis muscle mass was 3-5 and 1-3 g, respectively. As a result, the magnitude of the DeltaPao values generated by a maximal contraction of the parasternal intercostals or triangularis sterni in all interspaces would be only 1-3 cmH2O. 5. These studies therefore confirm that the parasternal intercostals in man have an inspiratory action on the lung whereas the triangularis sterni has an expiratory action. However, these studies also establish the important fact that the pressure-generating ability of both muscles is substantially smaller than in the dog.

Mechanical advantage of the canine diaphragm

The mechanical advantage (mu) of a respiratory muscle is defined as the respiratory pressure generated per unit muscle mass and per unit active stress. The value of mu can be obtained by measuring the change in the length of the muscle during inflation of the passive lung and chest wall. We report values of mu for the muscles of the canine diaphragm that were obtained by measuring the lengths of the muscles during a passive quasistatic vital capacity maneuver. Radiopaque markers were attached along six muscle bundles of the costal and two muscle bundles of the crural left hemidiaphragms of four bred-for-research beagle dogs. The three-dimensional locations of the markers were obtained from biplane video-fluoroscopic images taken at four volumes during a passive relaxation maneuver from total lung capacity to functional residual capacity in the prone and supine postures. Muscle lengths were determined as a function of lung volume, and from these data, values of mu were obtained. Values of mu are fairly uniform around the ventral midcostal and crural diaphragm but significantly lower at the dorsal end of the costal diaphragm. The average values of mu are -0.35 +/- 0.18 and -0.27 +/- 0.16 cmH2O. g-1. kg-1. cm-2 in the prone and supine dog, respectively. These values are 1. 5-2 times larger than the largest values of mu of the intercostal muscles in the supine dog. From these data we estimate that during spontaneous breathing the diaphragm contributes approximately 40% of inspiratory pressure in the prone posture and approximately 30% in the supine posture. Passive shortening, and hence mu, in the upper one-third of inspiratory capacity is less than one-half of that at lower lung volume. The lower mu is attributed primarily to a lower abdominal compliance at high lung volume.