Upper airway afferents are sufficient to evoke the early components of respiratory-related cortical potentials in humans

Respiratory-related evoked potentials in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy aging

Altered neural processing and increased respiratory sensations have been reported in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as larger respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREPs), but the effect of healthy-aging has not been considered adequately. We tested RREPs evoked by brief airway occlusions in 10 participants with moderate-to-severe COPD, 11 age-matched controls (AMC) and 14 young controls (YC), with similar airway occlusion pressure stimuli across groups. Mean age was 76 years for COPD and AMC groups, and 30 years for the YC group. Occlusion intensity and unpleasantness was rated using the modified Borg scale, and anxiety rated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. There was no difference in RREP peak amplitudes across groups, except for the N1 peak, which was significantly greater in the YC group than the COPD and AMC groups (p = 0.011). The latencies of P1, P2 and P3 occurred later in COPD versus YC (p < 0.05). P3 latency occurred later in AMC than YC (p = 0.024). COPD and AMC groups had similar Borg ratings for occlusion intensity (3.0 (0.5, 3.5) [Median (IQR)] and 3.0 (3.0, 3.0), respectively; p = 0.476) and occlusion unpleasantness (1.3 (0.1, 3.4) and 1.0 (0.75, 2.0), respectively; p = 0.702). The COPD group had a higher anxiety score than AMC group (p = 0.013). A higher N1 amplitude suggests the YC group had higher cognitive processing of respiratory inputs than the COPD and AMC groups. Both COPD and AMC groups showed delayed neural responses to the airway occlusion, which may indicate impaired processing of respiratory sensory inputs in COPD and healthy aging.

Dyspnea

The clinical term dyspnea (a.k.a. breathlessness or shortness of breath) encompasses at least three qualitatively distinct sensations that warn of threats to breathing: air hunger, effort to breathe, and chest tightness. Air hunger is a primal homeostatic warning signal of insufficient alveolar ventilation that can produce fear and anxiety and severely impacts the lives of patients with cardiopulmonary, neuromuscular, psychological, and end-stage disease. The sense of effort to breathe informs of increased respiratory muscle activity and warns of potential impediments to breathing. Most frequently associated with bronchoconstriction, chest tightness may warn of airway inflammation and constriction through activation of airway sensory nerves. This chapter reviews human and functional brain imaging studies with comparison to pertinent neurorespiratory studies in animals to propose the interoceptive networks underlying each sensation. The neural origins of their distinct sensory and affective dimensions are discussed, and areas for future research are proposed. Despite dyspnea's clinical prevalence and impact, management of dyspnea languishes decades behind the treatment of pain. The neurophysiological bases of current therapeutic approaches are reviewed; however, a better understanding of the neural mechanisms of dyspnea may lead to development of novel therapies and improved patient care.

The test-retest reliability of the respiratory-related evoked potential

The respiratory-related evoked potential (RREP) is an established technique to study the neural processing of respiratory sensations. We examined the test-retest reliability of the RREP during an unloaded baseline condition (no dyspnea) and an inspiratory resistive loaded breathing condition (dyspnea) over a one-week period. RREPs were evoked by short inspiratory occlusions (150 ms) while EEG was continuously measured. The mean amplitudes of the RREP components Nf, P1, N1, P2, and P3 were studied. For the no dyspnea condition, moderate test-retest reliability for Nf (intraclass correlation coefficient ICC: 0.73) and P1 (ICC: 0.74), good test-retest reliability for N1 (ICC: 0.89) and P3 (ICC: 0.76), and excellent test-retest reliability for P2 (ICC: 0.92) was demonstrated. For the dyspnea condition, moderate test-retest reliability was found for Nf (ICC: 0.69) and P1 (ICC: 0.57) and good test-retest reliability for N1 (ICC: 0.77), P2 (ICC: 0.84), and P3 (ICC: 0.77). This indicates that the RREP components Nf, P1, N1, P2, and P3, elicited by inspiratory occlusions, show adequate reliability in a test-retest study design with or without parallel sustained resistive load-induced dyspnea.

Genioglossus muscle responses to resistive loads in severe OSA patients and healthy control subjects

This study aimed to determine whether there is impairment of genioglossus neuromuscular responses to small negative pressure respiratory stimuli, close to the conscious detection threshold, in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We compared genioglossus electromyogram (EMGgg) responses to midinspiratory resistive loads of varying intensity (≈1.2-6.2 cmH₂O·L^-1·s), delivered via a nasal mask, between 16 severe OSA and 17 control participants while the subjects were awake and in a seated upright position. We examined the relationship between stimulus intensity and peak EMGgg amplitude in a 200-ms poststimulus window and hypothesized that OSA patients would have an increased activation threshold and reduced sensitivity in the relationship between EMGgg activation and stimulus intensity. There was no significant difference between control and OSA participants in the threshold (P = 0.545) or the sensitivity (P = 0.482) of the EMGgg amplitude vs. stimulus intensity relationship, where change in epiglottic pressure relative to background epiglottic pressure represented stimulus intensity. These results do not support the hypothesis that deficits in neuromuscular response to negative upper airway pressure exist in OSA during wakefulness; however, the results are likely influenced by a counterintuitive and novel genioglossus muscle suppression response observed in a significant proportion of both OSA and healthy control participants. This suppression response may relate to the inhibition seen in inspiratory muscles such as the diaphragm in response to sudden-onset negative pressure, and its presence provides new insight into the upper airway neuromuscular response to the collapsing force of negative pressure.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study used a novel midinspiratory resistive load stimulus to study upper airway neuromuscular responses to negative pressure during wakefulness in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although no differences were found between OSA and healthy groups, the study uncovered a novel and unexpected suppression of neuromuscular activity in a large proportion of both OSA and healthy participants. The unusual response provides new insight into the upper airway neuromuscular response to the collapsing force of negative pressure.

Sensorimotor function of the upper-airway muscles and respiratory sensory processing in untreated obstructive sleep apnea

Numerous studies have demonstrated upper-airway neuromuscular abnormalities during wakefulness in snorers and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. However, the functional role of sensorimotor impairment in OSA pathogenesis/disease progression and its potential effects on protective upper-airway reflexes, measures of respiratory sensory processing, and force characteristics remain unclear. This study aimed to gain physiological insight into the potential role of sensorimotor impairment in OSA pathogenesis/disease progression by comparing sensory processing properties (respiratory-related evoked potentials; RREP), functionally important protective reflexes (genioglossus and tensor palatini) across a range of negative pressures (brief pulses and entrained iron lung ventilation), and tongue force and time to task failure characteristics between 12 untreated OSA patients and 13 controls. We hypothesized that abnormalities in these measures would be present in OSA patients. Upper-airway reflexes (e.g., genioglossus onset latency, 20 ± 1 vs. 19 ± 2 ms, P = 0.82), early RREP components (e.g., P1 latency 25 ± 2 vs. 25 ± 1 ms, P = 0.78), and the slope of epiglottic pressure vs. genioglossus activity during iron lung ventilation (-0.68 ± 1.0 vs. -0.80 ± 2.0 cmH(2)O/%max, P = 0.59) were not different between patients and controls. Maximal tongue protrusion force was greater in OSA patients vs. controls (35 ± 2 vs. 27 ± 2 N, P < 0.01), but task failure occurred more rapidly (149 ± 24 vs. 254 ± 23 s, P < 0.01). Upper-airway protective reflexes across a range of negative pressures as measured by electromyography and the early P1 component of the RREP are preserved in OSA patients during wakefulness. Consistent with an adaptive training effect, tongue protrusion force is increased, not decreased, in untreated OSA patients. However, OSA patients may be vulnerable to fatigue of upper-airway dilator muscles, which could contribute to disease progression.

Blunted respiratory-related evoked potential in awake obstructive sleep apnoea subjects: a NEP technique study

OBJECTIVE

Respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREP) elicited by transmural pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) subjects have reported conflicting data. Different features of pressure stimuli and/or in the timing of stimuli application seem to account for these contradictory results. The negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique, highly reproducible in terms of rise time and pressure values, allows to minimize the methodological confounding factors. We determined whether the afferent activity from the upper airway (UA) is altered in OSA subjects.

METHODS

RREP potentials were examined in 10 OSA and in 12 non-apnoeic awake subjects by means of the NEP technique.

RESULTS

All controls showed a cortical response to all pressure stimuli. All OSA subjects showed responses to -5 and -10 cmH(2)O whereas six of them showed no responses to -1 cmH(2)O. The amplitude of the P22, N45 and P85 components of the RREP was significantly reduced in OSA with respect to the controls in response to both the -5 and -10 cmH(2)O stimuli. We found no significant differences in latencies.

CONCLUSIONS

Awake OSA subjects had a raised threshold to pressure stimuli and blunted respiratory-related evoked potentials.

SIGNIFICANCE

These data indicate a deficit in afferent activity in the UA.

Abnormal respiratory-related evoked potentials in untreated awake patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

AIM

Obstructive sleep apnoeas generate an intense afferent traffic leading to arousal and apnoea termination. Yet a decrease in the sensitivity of the afferents has been described in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, and could be a determinant of disease severity. How mechanical changes within the respiratory system are processed in the brain can be studied through the analysis of airway occlusion-related respiratory-related evoked potentials. Respiratory-related evoked potentials have been found altered during sleep in mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, with contradictory results during wake. We hypothesized that respiratory-related evoked potentials' alterations during wake, if indeed a feature of the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, should be present in untreated severe patients.

METHODS

Ten untreated patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and eight matched controls were studied. Respiratory-related evoked potentials were recorded in Cz-C3 and Cz-C4, and described in terms of the amplitudes and latencies of their components P1, N1, P2 and N2.

RESULTS

Components amplitudes were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in P1 latencies. This was also the case for N1 in Cz-C3. In contrast, N1 latencies in Cz-C4 were significantly longer in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome [median 98 ms (interquartile range 16.00) versus 79.5 ms (5.98), P = 0.015]. P2 and N2 were also significantly delayed, on both sides.

CONCLUSIONS

The cortical processing of airway occlusion-related afferents seems abnormal in untreated patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. This could be either a severity marker and/or an aggravating factor.

Cortical processing of respiratory occlusion stimuli in children with central hypoventilation syndrome

RATIONALE

The ability of patients with central hypoventilation syndrome (CHS) to produce and process mechanoreceptor signals is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

Children with CHS hypoventilate during sleep, although they generally breathe adequately during wakefulness. Previous studies suggest that they have compromised central integration of afferent stimuli, rather than abnormal sensors or receptors. Cortical integration of afferent mechanical stimuli caused by respiratory loading or upper airway occlusion can be tested by measuring respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREPs). We hypothesized that patients with CHS would have blunted RREP during both wakefulness and sleep.

METHODS

RREPs were produced with multiple upper airway occlusions and were obtained during wakefulness, stage 2, slow-wave, and REM sleep. Ten patients with CHS and 20 control subjects participated in the study, which took place at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Each patient was age- and sex-matched to two control subjects. Wakefulness data were collected from 9 patients and 18 control subjects.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During wakefulness, patients demonstrated reduced Nf and P300 responses compared with control subjects. During non-REM sleep, patients demonstrated a reduced N350 response. In REM sleep, patients had a later P2 response.

CONCLUSIONS

CHS patients are able to produce cortical responses to mechanical load stimulation during both wakefulness and sleep; however, central integration of the afferent signal is disrupted during wakefulness, and responses during non-REM are damped relative to control subjects. The finding of differences between patients and control subjects during REM may be due to increased intrinsic excitatory inputs to the respiratory system in this state.

Impaired cortical processing of inspiratory loads in children with chronic respiratory defects

BACKGROUND

Inspiratory occlusion evoked cortical potentials (the respiratory related-evoked potentials, RREPs) bear witness of the processing of changes in respiratory mechanics by the brain. Their impairment in children having suffered near-fatal asthma supports the hypothesis that relates asthma severity with the ability of the patients to perceive respiratory changes. It is not known whether or not chronic respiratory defects are associated with an alteration in brain processing of inspiratory loads. The aim of the present study was to compare the presence, the latencies and the amplitudes of the P1, N1, P2, and N2 components of the RREPs in children with chronic lung or neuromuscular disease.

METHODS

RREPs were recorded in patients with stable asthma (n = 21), cystic fibrosis (n = 32), and neuromuscular disease (n = 16) and in healthy controls (n = 11).

RESULTS

The 4 RREP components were significantly less frequently observed in the 3 groups of patients than in the controls. Within the patient groups, the N1 and the P2 components were significantly less frequently observed in the patients with asthma (16/21 for both components) and cystic fibrosis (20/32 and 14/32) than in the patients with neuromuscular disease (15/16 and 16/16). When present, the latencies and amplitudes of the 4 components were similar in the patients and controls.

CONCLUSION

Chronic ventilatory defects in children are associated with an impaired cortical processing of afferent respiratory signals.

Respiratory-related evoked potentials in children with asthma

AIMS OF THE STUDY

Respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREPs) are a method of recording brain activities in response to respiratory stimuli. Although data in childhood are scarce, the absence of the early P1 component of RREPs has been reported in children with a history of life-threatening asthma. This study was focused on the presence, latencies, and amplitudes of the P1, N1, P2, and N2 components of the RREPs in a paediatric series of asthmatic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

RREPs were recorded in 21 patients with stable asthma, age range 8-17 years, 11 healthy children, age range 6-16 years, and 24 healthy adults, age range 20-28 years. The signals from left (C3-Cz) and right (C4-Cz) central (rolandic) location were recorded separately, using surface electrodes. Evoked responses to two series of 80 consecutive mid-inspiratory occlusions were averaged. Recordings were analysed manually.

RESULTS

All 4 RREPs components were significantly more often absent in asthmatic children than in healthy children and adults (P1, p=0.01; N1, p=0.008; P2, p=0.008, N2, p=0.01). The latencies and amplitudes of the four components were similar in patients and healthy subjects.

CONCLUSION

RREPs components were less frequently present in children with asthma than in healthy subjects. This finding should promote the recording of RREPs in other acute and chronic respiratory diseases in children in order to search for possible electroclinical correlations.