Microgravity decreases and hypergravity increases exhaled nitric oxide

Pulmonary nitric oxide in astronauts before and during long-term spaceflight

Introduction: During exploratory space flights astronauts risk exposure to toxic planetary dust. Exhaled nitric oxide partial pressure (PENO) is a simple method to monitor lung health by detecting airway inflammation after dust inhalation. The turnover of NO in the lungs is dependent on several factors which will be altered during planetary exploration such as gravity (G) and gas density. To investigate the impacts of these factors on normal PENO, we took measurements before and during a stay at the International Space Station, at both normal and reduced atmospheric pressures. We expected stable PENO levels during the preflight and inflight periods, with lower values inflight. With reduced pressure we expected no net changes of PENO. Material and methods: Ten astronauts were studied during the pre-flight (1 G) and inflight (µG) periods at normal pressure [1.0 ata (atmospheres absolute)], with six of them also monitored at reduced (0.7 ata) pressure and gas density. The average observation period was from 191 days before launch until 105 days after launch. PENO was measured together with estimates of alveolar NO and the airway contribution to the exhaled NO flux. Results: The levels of PENO at 50 mL/s (PENO50) were not stable during the preflight and inflight periods respectively but decreased with time (p = 0.0284) at a rate of 0.55 (0.24) [mean (SD)] mPa per 180 days throughout the observation period, so that there was a significant difference (p < 0.01, N = 10) between gravity conditions. Thus, PENO50 averaged 2.28 (0.70) mPa at 1 G and 1.65 (0.51) mPa during µG (-27%). Reduced atmospheric pressure had no net impact on PENO50 but increased the airway contribution to exhaled NO. Discussion: The time courses of PENO50 suggest an initial airway inflammation, which gradually subsided. Our previous hypothesis of an increased uptake of NO to the blood by means of an expanded gas-blood interface in µG leading to decreased PENO50 is neither supported nor contradicted by the present findings. Baseline PENO50 values for lung health monitoring in astronauts should be obtained not only on ground but also during the relevant gravity conditions and before the possibility of inhaling toxic planetary dust.

Overview of lunar dust toxicity risk

Lunar dust (LD), the component of lunar regolith with particle sizes less than 20 μm, covers the surface of the Moon. Due to its fineness, jagged edges, and electrostatic charge, LD adheres to and coats almost any surface it contacts. As a result, LD poses known risks to the proper functioning of electronic and mechanical equipment on the lunar surface. However, its mechanical irritancy and chemical reactivity may also pose serious health risks to humans by a number of mechanisms. While Apollo astronauts reported mild short-lived respiratory symptoms, the spectrum of health effects associated with high-dose acute exposure or chronic low-dose exposure are not yet well-understood. This paper explores known and potential human risks of exposure to LD which are thought to be important in planning upcoming lunar missions and planetary surface work.

Exposure to hypergravity increases serum interleukin-5 and pulmonary infiltration in mice with allergic asthma

Objective

We evaluated the effect of acute hypergravity (HG) on the immune response in a murine model of allergic asthma.

Material and methods

Twenty-eight BALB/c mice were used. Group A (control group, n = 7) mice were sensitized and challenged with normal saline. Group B (control HG exposure group, n = 7) mice were sensitized, challenged with saline, and exposed to acute HG (+10 Gz) for 4 hours. Group C (asthma group, n = 7) mice were challenged with intraperitoneal and intranasal ovalbumin (OVA) to induce asthma. Group D (asthma HG exposure group, n = 7) mice were exposed to HG for 4 hours after the induction of asthma. We estimated the total and OVA-specific serum IgE, serum titers of various cytokines, and the number of eosinophils, neutrophils, and lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Histopathology of the lung was also evaluated.

Results

The serum level of interleukin (IL)-5 was significantly higher in Group D (12.9 ±4.9 pg/ml) compared to that in Group C (4.7 ±6.5 pg/ml, p = 0.017). In BAL fluid, the number of neutrophils was significantly increased in Group D compared to Group C (p = 0.014). Group D demonstrated a higher infiltration of inflammatory cells (9973.8 ±1642.7 cells/mm²) compared to Group C (7666.3 ±586.5 cells/mm², p = 0.017). This tendency of increase in infiltration was not significant in non-asthmatic animals (Group A: 4488.8 ±176.1 cells/mm² vs. Group B: 4946.3 ±513.7 cells/mm², p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Acute HG exacerbated the allergic response by increasing serum IL-5 levels and promoting pulmonary infiltration of inflammatory cells.

Effects of ambient pressure on pulmonary nitric oxide

Airway nitric oxide (NO) has been proposed to play a role in the development of high-altitude pulmonary edema. We undertook a study of the effects of acute changes of ambient pressure on exhaled and alveolar NO in the range 0.5-4 atmospheres absolute (ATA, 379-3,040 mmHg) in eight healthy subjects breathing normoxic nitrogen-oxygen mixtures. On the basis of previous work with inhalation of low-density helium-oxygen gas, we expected facilitated backdiffusion and lowered exhaled NO at 0.5 ATA and the opposite at 4 ATA. Instead, the exhaled NO partial pressure (Pe(NO)) did not differ between pressures and averaged 1.21 ± 0.16 (SE) mPa across pressures. As a consequence, exhaled NO fractions varied inversely with pressure. Alveolar estimates of the NO partial pressure differed between pressures and averaged 88 (P = 0.04) and 176 (P = 0.009) percent of control (1 ATA) at 0.5 and 4 ATA, respectively. The airway contribution to exhaled NO was reduced to 79% of control (P = 0.009) at 4 ATA. Our finding of the same Pe(NO) at 0.5 and 1 ATA is at variance with previous findings of a reduced Pe(NO) with inhalation of low-density gas at normal pressure, and this discrepancy may be due to the much longer durations of low-density gas breathing in the present study compared with previous studies with helium-oxygen breathing. The present data are compatible with the notion of an enhanced convective backtransport of NO, compensating for attenuated backdiffusion of NO with increasing pressure. An alternative interpretation is a pressure-induced suppression of NO formation in the airways.