Unbounded evidence accumulation characterizes subjective visual vertical forced-choice perceptual choice and confidence

Your Vestibular Thresholds May Be Lower Than You Think: Cognitive Biases in Vestibular Psychophysics

PURPOSE

Recently, there has been a surge of interest in measuring vestibular perceptual thresholds, which quantify the smallest motion that a subject can reliably perceive, to study physiology and pathophysiology. These thresholds are sensitive to age, pathology, and postural performance. Threshold tasks require decisions to be made in the presence of uncertainty. Since humans often rely on past information when making decisions in the presence of uncertainty, we hypothesized that (a) perceptual responses are affected by their preceding trial; (b) perceptual responses tend to be biased opposite of the "preceding response" because of cognitive biases but are not biased by the "preceding stimulus"; and (c) when fits do not account for this cognitive bias, thresholds are overestimated. To our knowledge, these hypotheses are unaddressed in vestibular and direction-recognition tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Results in normal subjects supported each hypothesis. Subjects tended to respond opposite of their preceding response (not the preceding stimulus), indicating a cognitive bias, and this caused an overestimation of thresholds. Using an enhanced model (MATLAB code provided) that considered these effects, average thresholds were lower (5.5% for yaw, 7.1% for interaural). Since the results indicate that the magnitude of cognitive bias varies across subjects, this enhanced model can reduce measurement variability and potentially improve the efficiency of data collection.

Comparing the impact of the method of adjustment and forced-choice methodologies on subjective visual vertical bias and variability

BACKGROUND

Previous research suggested that the method of adjustment and forced choice variants of the subjective visual vertical (SVV) produce comparable estimates of both bias and variability. However, variants of the SVV that utilize a method of adjustment procedure are known to be heavily influenced by task parameters, including the stimulus rotation speed, which was not accounted for in previous SVV research comparing the method of adjustment to forced-choice.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to determine if (1) the SVV with a forced-choice procedure produces both bias and variability estimates that are comparable to those obtained using a method of adjustment procedure, (2) to see if rotation speed impacts the comparability of estimates and (3) quantify correlations between the estimates produced by different procedures.

METHODS

Participants completed a variant of the SVV which utilized a forced-choice procedure as well as two variants of the SVV using a method of adjustment procedure with two different rotation speeds (6°/s and 12°/s).

RESULTS

We found that the bias estimates were similar across all three conditions tested and that the variability estimates were greater in the SVV variants that utilized a method of adjustment procedure. This difference was more pronounced when the rotation speed was slower (6°/s).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that forced-choice and method of adjustment methodologies yield similar bias estimates and different variability estimates. Given these results, we recommend utilizing forced-choice procedures unless (a) forced-choice is not feasible or (b) response variability is unimportant. We also recommend that clinicians consider the SVV methods when interpreting a patient's test results, especially for variability metrics.

Perceptual confidence of visual stimulus features is associated with duration perception

It has been shown that the perceived duration of an object in the subsecond range is closely associated with its nontemporal perceptual properties, the mechanism under which remains unclear. Previous studies have revealed a modulatory effect of early visual feature processing on the apparent duration. Here, we further examined the relationship between perceptual confidence and subjective time by asking participants to simultaneously perform temporal and nontemporal perceptual judgments. The results revealed a significant effect on confidence levels. When participants' confidence in judging the coherent motion direction or relative dot numerosity increases, their perceived duration of the stimulus also appears longer. These results are discussed in the context of perceptual evidence accumulation and evaluation for the decision-making of perceptual properties. They suggest a profound contribution of object processing to the computation of subjective time and provide further insights into the mechanism of event timing.

Neural Substrates of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Brain Disorders

Many studies on the drift-diffusion model (DDM) explain decision-making based on a unified analysis of both accuracy and response times. This review provides an in-depth account of the recent advances in DDM research which ground different DDM parameters on several brain areas, including the cortex and basal ganglia. Furthermore, we discuss the changes in DDM parameters due to structural and functional impairments in several clinical disorders, including Parkinson's disease, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism Spectrum Disorders, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), and schizophrenia. This review thus uses DDM to provide a theoretical understanding of different brain disorders.

Vestibular Precision at the Level of Perception, Eye Movements, Posture, and Neurons

Precision and accuracy are two fundamental properties of any system, including the nervous system. Reduced precision (i.e., imprecision) results from the presence of neural noise at each level of sensory, motor, and perceptual processing. This review has three objectives: (1) to show the importance of studying vestibular precision, and specifically that studying accuracy without studying precision ignores fundamental aspects of the vestibular system; (2) to synthesize key hypotheses about precision in vestibular perception, the vestibulo-ocular reflex, posture, and neurons; and (3) to show that groups of studies that are thoughts to be distinct (e.g., perceptual thresholds, subjective visual vertical variability, neuronal variability) are actually "two sides of the same coin" - because the methods used allow results to be related to the standard deviation of a Gaussian distribution describing the underlying neural noise. Vestibular precision varies with age, stimulus amplitude, stimulus frequency, body orientation, motion direction, pathology, medication, and electrical/mechanical vestibular stimulation, but does not vary with sex. The brain optimizes precision during integration of vestibular cues with visual, auditory, and/or somatosensory cues. Since a common concern with precision metrics is time required for testing, we describe approaches to optimize data collection and provide evidence that fatigue and session effects are minimal. Finally, we summarize how precision is an individual trait that is correlated with clinical outcomes in patients as well as with performance in functional tasks like balance. These findings highlight the importance of studying vestibular precision and accuracy, and that knowledge gaps remain.

Frontal scalp potentials foretell perceptual choice confidence

When making decisions, people naturally ask two implicit questions: how soon can I make a decision, and how certain am I? In perception, people's confidence (how certain?) shows a nonmonotonic relationship with response time (how soon?), such that choice confidence can either increase or decrease with response time. Although a frontoparietal network has been implicated as a neural substrate that binds choice confidence and action (e.g., response time), the dynamic interplay between choice behaviors within such a network has not been clarified. Here, we show that frontal event-related potentials (ERPs) reflect choice confidence before a decision. Specifically, we report a second positive peak of the stimulus-locked frontal ERP at ~500 ms that scales with confidence but not stimulus level, whereas the centroparietal ERP amplitude covaries inversely with response time. This frontal ERP component occurs before the response, which helps explain the inverse relationship between choice confidence and response time (i.e., higher confidence for shorter response time) when choice accuracy is emphasized over speed. Our findings provide the first early neural representation of confidence, consistent with the temporal precedence for its causal role in the current decision-making task: "I decided earlier because I am confident."NEW & NOTEWORTHY We report novel neural correlates of predecisional choice confidence in frontal scalp potential in humans. In conjunction with the centroparietal choice-action event-related potential component, this new frontal choice confidence component further elucidates the dynamics of the frontoparietal decision-making neural circuitry.

The Do's and Don'ts of Psychophysical Methods for Interpretability of Psychometric Functions and Their Descriptors

Many areas of research require measuring psychometric functions or their descriptors (thresholds, slopes, etc.). Data for this purpose are collected with psychophysical methods of various types and justification for the interpretation of results arises from a model of performance grounded in signal detection theory. Decades of research have shown that psychophysical data display features that are incompatible with such framework, questioning the validity of interpretations obtained under it and revealing that psychophysical performance is more complex than this framework entertains. This paper describes the assumptions and formulation of the conventional framework for the two major classes of psychophysical methods (single- and dual-presentation methods) and presents various lines of empirical evidence that the framework is inconsistent with. An alternative framework is then described and shown to account for all the characteristics that the conventional framework regards as anomalies. This alternative process model explicitly separates the sensory, decisional, and response components of performance and represents them via parameters whose estimation characterizes the corresponding processes. Retrospective and prospective evidence of the validity of the alternative framework is also presented. A formal analysis also reveals that some psychophysical methods and response formats are unsuitable for separation of the three components of observed performance. Recommendations are thus given regarding practices that should be avoided and those that should be followed to ensure interpretability of the psychometric function, or descriptors (detection threshold, difference limen, point of subjective equality, etc.) obtained with shortcut methods that do not require estimation of psychometric functions.

When uncertain, does human self-motion decision-making fully utilize complete information?

When forced to choose humans often feel uncertain. Investigations of human perceptual decision-making often employ signal detection theory, which assumes that even when uncertain all available information is fully utilized. However, other studies have suggested or assumed that, when uncertain, human subjects guess totally at random, ignoring available information. When uncertain, do humans simply guess totally at random? Or do humans fully utilize complete information? Or does behavior fall between these two extremes yielding "above chance" performance without fully utilizing complete information? While it is often assumed complete information is fully utilized, even when uncertain, to our knowledge this has never been experimentally confirmed. To answer this question, we combined numerical simulations, theoretical analyses, and human studies performed using a self-motion direction-recognition perceptual decision-making task (did I rotate left or right?). Subjects were instructed to make forced-choice binary (left/right) and trinary (left/right/uncertain) decisions when cued following each stimulus. Our results show that humans 1) do not guess at random when uncertain and 2) make binary and trinary decisions equally well. These findings show that humans fully utilize complete information when uncertain for our perceptual decision-making task. This helps unify signal detection theory and other models of forced-choice decision-making which allow for uncertain responses. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Humans make many perceptual decisions every day. But what if we are uncertain? While many studies assume that humans fully utilize complete information, other studies have suggested and/or assumed that when we're uncertain and forced to decide, information is not fully utilized. While humans tend to perform above chance when uncertain, no earlier study has tested whether available information is fully utilized. Our results show that humans make fully informed decisions even when uncertain.