Cortical responses to thermal pain depend on stimulus size: a functional MRI study

A Comprehensive Review of Pain Interference on Postural Control: From Experimental to Chronic Pain

Motor control, movement impairment, and postural control recovery targeted in rehabilitation could be affected by pain. The main objective of this comprehensive review is to provide a synthesis of the effect of experimental and chronic pain on postural control throughout the available literature. After presenting the neurophysiological pathways of pain, we demonstrated that pain, preferentially localized in the lower back or in the leg induced postural control alteration. Although proprioceptive and cortical excitability seem modified with pain, spinal modulation assessment might provide a new understanding of the pain phenomenon related to postural control. The literature highlights that the motor control of trunk muscles in patient presenting with lower back pain could be dichotomized in two populations, where the first over-activates the trunk muscles, and the second under-activates the trunk muscles; both generate an increase in tissue loading. Taking all these findings into account will help clinician to provide adapted treatment for managing both pain and postural control.

Nonlinear increase of pain in distance-based and area-based spatial summation

ABSTRACT

When nociceptive stimulation affects a larger body area, pain increases. This effect is called spatial summation of pain (SSp). The aim of this study was to describe SSp as a function of the size or distance of a stimulated area(s) and to test how this function is shaped by the intensity and SSp test paradigm. Thirty-one healthy volunteers participated in a within-subject experiment. Participants were exposed to area-based and distanced-based SSp. For area-based SSp, electrocutaneous noxious stimuli were applied by up to 5 electrodes (5 areas) forming a line-like pattern; for distance-based SSp, the same position and lengths of stimuli were used but only 2 electrodes were stimulated. Each paradigm was repeated using pain of low, moderate, and high intensity. It was found that the pattern of pain intensity followed a logarithmic (power) rather than a linear function. The dynamics of the pain increase were significantly different across pain intensities, with more summation occurring when pain was perceived as low. Results indicated that area-based SSp is more painful than distance-based SSp when low and moderate but not when high pain intensity is induced. Presented findings have important implications for all studies in which the spatial dimension of pain is measured. When the area or separation between nociceptive stimulation increases, pain does not increase linearly and the pattern of the pain increase is a result of the interaction between intensity and the number of nociceptive sites. A power function should be considered when predicting the size of a nociceptive source.

Some like it, some do not: behavioral responses and central processing of olfactory-trigeminal mixture perception

Exploring the potential of eucalyptol as a masking agent for aversive odors, we found that eucalyptol masks the olfactory but not the trigeminal sensation of ammonia in a previous study. Here, we further investigate the processing of a mixture consisting of eucalyptol and ammonia, two olfactory–trigeminal stimuli. We presented the two pure odors and a mixture thereof to 33 healthy participants. The nostrils were stimulated alternately (monorhinal application). We analyzed the behavioral ratings (intensity and pleasantness) and functional brain images. First, we replicated our previous finding that, within the mixture, the eucalyptol component suppressed the olfactory intensity of the ammonia component. Second, mixture pleasantness was rated differently by participants depending on which component dominated their mixture perception. Approximately half of the volunteers rated the eucalyptol component as more intense and evaluated the mixture as pleasant (pleasant group). The other half rated the ammonia component as more intense and evaluated the mixture as unpleasant (unpleasant group). Third, these individual differences were also found in functional imaging data. Contrasting the mixture either to eucalyptol or to both single odors, neural activation was found in the unpleasant group only. Activation in the anterior insula and SII was interpreted as evidence for an attentional shift towards the potentially threatening mixture component ammonia and for trigeminal enhancement. In addition to insula and SII, further regions of the pain matrix were involved when assessing all participant responses to the mixture. Both a painful sensation and an attentional shift towards the unpleasant mixture component complicates the development of an efficient mask because a pleasant perception is an important requirement for malodor coverage.

Functional brain activity during motor control and pain processing in chronic jaw pain

Changes in brain function in chronic pain have been studied using paradigms that deliver acute pain-eliciting stimuli or assess the brain at rest. Although motor disability accompanies many chronic pain conditions, few studies have directly assessed brain activity during motor function in individuals with chronic pain. Using chronic jaw pain as a model, we assessed brain activity during a precisely controlled grip force task and during a precisely controlled pain-eliciting stimulus on the forearm. We used multivariate analyses to identify regions across the brain whose activity together best separated the groups. We report 2 novel findings. First, although the parameters of grip force production were similar between the groups, the functional activity in regions including the prefrontal cortex, insula, and thalamus best separated the groups. Second, although stimulus intensity and pain perception were similar between the groups, functional activity in brain regions including the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, rostral ventral premotor cortex, and inferior parietal lobule best separated the groups. Our observations suggest that chronic jaw pain is associated with changes in how the brain processes motor and pain-related information even when the effector producing the force or experiencing the pain-eliciting stimulus is distant from the jaw. We also demonstrate that motor tasks and multivariate analyses offer alternative approaches for studying brain function in chronic jaw pain.

Unravelling the effect of experimental pain on the corticomotor system using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography

The interaction between pain and the motor system is well-known, with past studies showing that pain can alter corticomotor excitability and have deleterious effects on motor learning. The aim of this study was to better understand the cortical mechanisms underlying the interaction between pain and the motor system. Experimental pain was induced on 19 young and healthy participants using capsaicin cream, applied on the middle volar part of the left forearm. The effect of pain on brain activity and on the corticomotor system was assessed with electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), respectively. Compared to baseline, resting state brain activity significantly increased after capsaicin application in the central cuneus (theta frequency), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (alpha frequency), and left cuneus and right insula (beta frequency). A pain-evoked increase in the right primary motor cortex (M1) activity was also observed (beta frequency), but only among participants who showed a reduction in corticospinal output (as depicted by TMS recruitment curves). These participants further showed greater beta M1-cuneus connectivity than the other participants. These findings indicate that pain-evoked increases in M1 beta power are intimately tied to changes in the corticospinal system, and provide evidence that beta M1-cuneus connectivity is related to the corticomotor alterations induced by pain. The differential pattern of response observed in our participants suggest that the effect of pain on the motor system is variable from on individual to another; an observation that could have important clinical implications for rehabilitation professionals working with pain patients.

Nociceptive Local Field Potentials Recorded from the Human Insula Are Not Specific for Nociception

The insula, particularly its posterior portion, is often regarded as a primary cortex for pain. However, this interpretation is largely based on reverse inference, and a specific involvement of the insula in pain has never been demonstrated. Taking advantage of the high spatiotemporal resolution of direct intracerebral recordings, we investigated whether the human insula exhibits local field potentials (LFPs) specific for pain. Forty-seven insular sites were investigated. Participants received brief stimuli belonging to four different modalities (nociceptive, vibrotactile, auditory, and visual). Both nociceptive stimuli and non-nociceptive vibrotactile, auditory, and visual stimuli elicited consistent LFPs in the posterior and anterior insula, with matching spatial distributions. Furthermore, a blind source separation procedure showed that nociceptive LFPs are largely explained by multimodal neural activity also contributing to non-nociceptive LFPs. By revealing that LFPs elicited by nociceptive stimuli reflect activity unrelated to nociception and pain, our results confute the widespread assumption that these brain responses are a signature for pain perception and its modulation.

Local field potentials elicited in the human insular cortex by painful stimuli reflect cortical activity that is unrelated to pain perception and so cannot be used as an objective measure of pain.

A widely accepted notion is that the insula, especially its posterior portion, plays a specific role in the perception of pain. This has led a number of researchers to consider activity recorded from this so-called “ouch zone” as an objective correlate of pain perception. We provide compelling evidence to the contrary. Using direct intracerebral recordings, we demonstrate that painful and nonpainful stimuli elicit very similar responses throughout the human insula. This observation argues against the notion that these responses reflect the brain activity through which pain emerges from nociception in the human brain. These findings have implications for basic theories, as well as for the development of diagnostic tests and the identification of therapeutic targets for the treatment of chronic pain. They question the use of these insular responses to assess the effects of pharmacological treatment or to assess pain in patients unable to communicate. Furthermore, they have legal implications, as they contradict the proposal that these responses could be used to determine unequivocally whether plaintiffs are truly experiencing the pain for which they are seeking redress. Finally, they undermine the rationale for neurosurgical procedures aiming at alleviating pain by targeting the posterior insula.

The effect of acupuncture needle combination on central pain processing--an fMRI study

Background

Empirical acupuncture treatment paradigm for acute pain utilizing Tendinomuscular Meridians (TMM) calls for the stimulation of Ting Points (TPs) and Gathering point(GP). This study aims to compare the supraspinal neuronal mechanisms associated with both TPs and GP needling (EA3), and TPs needling alone (EA2) with fMRI.

Results

A significant (P < 0.01) difference between pre-scan (heat Pain) HP, and post-EA HP VAS scores in both paradigms was noted (n = 11). The post-EA HP VAS score was significantly (P < 0.05) lower with EA3 comparing to EA2 Within-group random effect analysis indicated that EA3+HP>EA3 (condition EA3+HP subtracted by condition EA3) appeared to exert a significant degree of activity suppression in the affective supraspinal regions including the IPL, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the insular cortex (IN). This level of suppression was not observed in the EA2+HP>EA2 (condition EA2+HP subtracted by condition EA2) within-group random effect analysis Between-group random effect analysis indicated that EA3 induced a significantly (P < 0.01, cluster size threshold 150) higher degree of deactivation than EA2 in several pain related supraspinal regions including the right prefrontal cortex, rostral anterior cingulate (rACC), medial cingulate cortex, left inferior frontal lobe and posterior cerebellum. The 2-factor ANOVA in those regions indicated both rACC and posterior cerebellum had a significant (P < 0.01) needle effect, and the right prefrontal area showed a significant (P < 0.01) HP effect. However, a significant interaction between the two factors was only found in the right prefrontal lobe. Granger causality analysis showed EA3 induced a much higher degree of inference among HP related supraspinal somatosensory, affective and modulatory components than EA2. Deactivation pattern at the medullary-pontine area casted a direct inference on the deactivation pattern of secondary somatosensory cortices which also affected the deactivation of the IN.

Conclusions

While both EA2 and EA3 induced a significant degree of deactivation in the human brain regions related to pain processing, the addition of GP stimulation further exerts an inhibitory effect on the ascending spinoreticular pain pathway. Therefore, different needling position as mandated in different empirical acupuncture treatment paradigms may play a different role in modulating pain related neuronal functions.

Neuroimaging Evidence of Motor Control and Pain Processing in the Human Midcingulate Cortex

Human neuroimaging and virus-tracing studies in monkey predict that motor control and pain processes should overlap in anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC), but there is currently no direct evidence that this is the case. We used a novel functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm to examine brain activity while subjects performed a motor control task, experienced a pain-eliciting stimulus on their hand, and performed the motor control task while also experiencing the pain-eliciting stimulus. Our experiment produced 3 novel results. First, group-level analyses showed that when separate trials of motor control and pain processing were performed, overlapping functional activity was found in the same regions of aMCC, supplementary motor area (SMA), anterior insula, and putamen. Secondly, increased activity was found in the aMCC and SMA when motor control and pain processing occurred simultaneously. Thirdly, individual-level analyses showed that 93% of subjects engaged the same region of aMCC during separate trials of motor control and pain processing irrespective of differences in the sulcal/gyral morphology of the cingulate cortex across individuals. These observations provide direct evidence in humans that the same region of aMCC is engaged for motor control and pain processing.

Common brain activations for painful and non-painful aversive stimuli

BACKGROUND

Identification of potentially harmful stimuli is necessary for the well-being and self-preservation of all organisms. However, the neural substrates involved in the processing of aversive stimuli are not well understood. For instance, painful and non-painful aversive stimuli are largely thought to activate different neural networks. However, it is presently unclear whether there is a common aversion-related network of brain regions responsible for the basic processing of aversive stimuli. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species translational approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis) and rodents (i.e. systematic review of functional neuroanatomy).

RESULTS

Animal and human data combined to show a core aversion-related network, consisting of similar cortical (i.e. MCC, PCC, AI, DMPFC, RTG, SMA, VLOFC; see results section or abbreviation section for full names) and subcortical (i.e. Amyg, BNST, DS, Hab, Hipp/Parahipp, Hyp, NAc, NTS, PAG, PBN, raphe, septal nuclei, Thal, LC, midbrain) regions. In addition, a number of regions appeared to be more involved in pain-related (e.g. sensory cortex) or non-pain-related (e.g. amygdala) aversive processing.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation suggests that aversive processing, at the most basic level, relies on similar neural substrates, and that differential responses may be due, in part, to the recruitment of additional structures as well as the spatio-temporal dynamic activity of the network. This network perspective may provide a clearer understanding of why components of this circuit appear dysfunctional in some psychiatric and pain-related disorders.

Decreased perceptual learning ability in complex regional pain syndrome

Recently, several functional imaging studies have shown that sensorimotor cortical representations may be changed in complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS). Therefore, we investigated tactile performance and tactile learning as indirect markers of cortical changes in patients with CRPS type I and controls. Patients had significant higher spatial discrimination thresholds at CRPS-affected extremities compared to both unaffected sides and control subjects. Furthermore, in order to improve tactile spatial acuity we used a Hebbian stimulation protocol of tactile coactivation. This consistently improved tactile acuity, both in controls and patients. However, the gain of performance was significantly lower on the CRPS-affected side implying an impaired perceptual learning ability. Therefore, we provide further support for an involvement of the CNS in CRPS, which may have implications to future neurorehabilitation strategies for this disease.

Localization of pain-related brain activation: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data

A meta-analysis of 140 neuroimaging studies was performed using the activation-likelihood-estimate (ALE) method to explore the location and extent of activation in the brain in response to noxious stimuli in healthy volunteers. The first analysis involved the creation of a likelihood map illustrating brain activation common across studies using noxious stimuli. The left thalamus, right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), bilateral anterior insulae, and left dorsal posterior insula had the highest likelihood of being activated. The second analysis contrasted noxious cold with noxious heat stimulation and revealed higher likelihood of activation to noxious cold in the subgenual ACC and the amygdala. The third analysis assessed the implications of using either a warm stimulus or a resting baseline as the control condition to reveal activation attributed to noxious heat. Comparing noxious heat to warm stimulation led to peak ALE values that were restricted to cortical regions with known nociceptive input. The fourth analysis tested for a hemispheric dominance in pain processing and showed the importance of the right hemisphere, with the strongest ALE peaks and clusters found in the right insula and ACC. The fifth analysis compared noxious muscle with cutaneous stimuli and the former type was more likely to evoke activation in the posterior and anterior cingulate cortices, precuneus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and cerebellum. In general, results indicate that some brain regions such as the thalamus, insula and ACC have a significant likelihood of activation regardless of the type of noxious stimuli, while other brain regions show a stimulus-specific likelihood of being activated.

Separating brain processing of pain from that of stimulus intensity

Regions of the brain network activated by painful stimuli are also activated by nonpainful and even nonsomatosensory stimuli. We therefore analyzed where the qualitative change from nonpainful to painful perception at the pain thresholds is coded. Noxious stimuli of gaseous carbon dioxide (n = 50) were applied to the nasal mucosa of 24 healthy volunteers at various concentrations from 10% below to 10% above the individual pain threshold. Functional magnetic resonance images showed that these trigeminal stimuli activated brain regions regarded as the "pain matrix." However, most of these activations, including the posterior insula, the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, the amygdala, and the middle cingulate cortex, were associated with quantitative changes in stimulus intensity and did not exclusively reflect the qualitative change from nonpainful to pain. After subtracting brain activations associated with quantitative changes in the stimuli, the qualitative change, reflecting pain-exclusive activations, could be localized mainly in the posterior insular cortex. This shows that cerebral processing of noxious stimuli focuses predominately on the quantitative properties of stimulus intensity in both their sensory and affective dimensions, whereas the integration of this information into the perception of pain is restricted to a small part of the pain matrix.

Nociceptive afferent activity alters the SI RA neuron response to mechanical skin stimulation

Procedures that reliably evoke cutaneous pain in humans (i.e., 5-7 s skin contact with a 47-51 °C probe, intradermal algogen injection) are shown to decrease the mean spike firing rate (MFR) and degree to which the rapidly adapting (RA) neurons in areas 3b/1 of squirrel monkey primary somatosensory cortex (SI) entrain to a 25-Hz stimulus to the receptive field center (RF(center)) when stimulus amplitude is "near-threshold" (i.e., 10-50 μm). In contrast, RA neuron MFR and entrainment are either unaffected or enhanced by 47-51 °C contact or intradermal algogen injection when the amplitude of 25-Hz stimulation is 100-200 μm (suprathreshold). The results are attributed to an "activity dependence" of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) action on the GABA(A) receptors of RA neurons. The nociceptive afferent drive triggered by skin contact with a 47-51 °C probe or intradermal algogen is proposed to activate nociresponsive neurons in area 3a which, via corticocortical connections, leads to the release of GABA in areas 3b/1. It is hypothesized that GABA is hyperpolarizing/inhibitory and suppresses stimulus-evoked RA neuron MFR and entrainment whenever RA neuron activity is low (as when the RF(center) stimulus is weak/near-threshold) but is depolarizing/excitatory and augments MFR and entrainment when RA neuron activity is high (when the stimulus is strong/suprathreshold).

Perception and suppression of thermally induced pain: a fMRI study

Two neuroimaging studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and thermally induced pain are presented. Fifteen healthy right-handed subjects were imaged while they had to discern different levels of thermal stimuli in the first study and while they disengaged from the feeling of pain during constant stimulation in the second study. In the first experiment, during painful phasic stimuli, right-sided anterior insular activation as well as bilateral posterior insular activation could be shown regardless of stimulation side, as well as right-sided activation of sensory association areas in the superior parietal lobule. Also, activation of the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex could be shown. In the second experiment, all subjects succeeded in suppressing the feeling of pain during previously painful levels of stimulation. During the early part of the tonic painful stimulation, bilateral activation of caudate head and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) as well as insular cortex and dorsal anterior cingulated cortex (dACC) was observed. During the late part of the tonic painful stimulation, anterior insular activation as well as dACC and bilateral prefrontal cortical activation could be shown. Taken together, the activation of PFC and caudate nucleus hints at an important role in the initiation (caudate) and maintenance (PFC) of suppression of the feeling of pain. No ipsilateral sensorimotor activation could be shown in the second experiment. The possible import of unwanted sensorimotor activation due to the simultaneous rating process in the first experiment is discussed.

Representation of UV-B-induced thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in the human brain: a functional MRI study

Surrogate models of pain and hyperalgesia allow the investigation of underlying mechanisms in healthy volunteers. Here, we investigated brain activation patterns during mechanical and heat hyperalgesia in an inflammatory human pain model using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Heat and mechanical hyperalgesia were induced on the right forearm by UV-B application in 14 healthy subjects. All four conditions (nonsensitized heat and nonsensitized mechanical pain, sensitized heat and sensitized mechanical pain) were perceptually matched. A 2 x 2 factorial analysis was performed. Areas with main effect of sensitization were insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), prefrontal cortices (PFC), parietal association cortices (PA), thalamus, and basal ganglia. A main effect of modality with more activation during heat hyperalgesia was found in primary somatosensory cortex (S1), ACC, PFC, and PA. A main effect of modality with more activation during mechanical hyperalgesia was found in secondary somatosensory cortices, posterior insula, and contralateral inferior frontal cortex (IFC). An interaction of sensitization and modality was found bilaterally in IFC. Areas with similar effects of sensitization in both stimulus modalities were ACC, bilateral anterior insula and bilateral IFC. We conclude that different types of hyperalgesia in a human surrogate model of inflammatory pain produce different brain activation patterns. This is partly due to a differential processing of thermal and mechanical pain and an interaction of sensitization and modality in the caudal portion of the IFC. Finally, the data provide evidence for the existence of a common "sensitization network" consisting of ACC, bilateral anterior insula, and parts of the IFC.

Common neural systems for contact heat and laser pain stimulation reveal higher-level pain processing

Our current knowledge of pain-related neuronal responses is largely based on experimental pain studies using contact heat or nontactile laser painful stimulation. Both stimuli evoke pain, yet they differ considerably in their physical and perceptual properties. In sensory cortex, cerebral responses to either stimulus should therefore substantially differ. However, given that both stimuli evoke pain, we hypothesized that at a certain subset of cortical regions the different physical properties of the stimuli become less important and are therefore activated by both stimuli. In contrast, regions with clearly dissociable activity may belong to "lower-level" pain processing mechanisms depending on the physical properties of the administered stimuli. We used functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) to intraindividually compare pain-related activation patterns between laser and contact heat stimulation using four different intensities of laser and contact heat stimuli. Common and dissociable neural responses were identified by correlating perceived pain intensities with blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal changes. Only neuronal responses to stimuli that were perceived as painful were analyzed. Pain-related BOLD signal increases independent of stimulus modality were detected in the anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, medial secondary somatosensory cortex, and the prefrontal cortex. These similarities are likely to reflect higher-level pain processing, which is largely independent of the single physical parameters that determine the painful nature of the stimuli.

Functional imaging of sensory decline and gain induced by differential noxious stimulation

It is increasingly recognized that pain-induced plasticity may provoke secondary sensory decline, i.e. centrally-mediated hypoesthesia and hypoalgesia. We investigated perceptual changes induced by conditioning electrical stimulation of C-nociceptors differing in stimulation frequencies and duty cycles provoking either sensory gain (i.e. mechanical hyperalgesia; Stim1) or sensory decline (i.e. hypoesthesia and hypoalgesia; Stim2). Underlying brain processing was investigated using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Before conditioning stimuli, tactile stimulation and pin-prick stimuli led to differential activations of primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (S1, S2), insula and prefrontal cortices (PFC). After induction of mechanical hyperalgesia (Stim1), increased activations were detected in somatosensory/pain-related areas (S1, S2, insula, cingulate cortex) and networks involved in attentional and cognitive processing (parieto-frontal, parieto-cingulate and frontal circuits). In contrast, after induction of hypoesthesia and hypoalgesia (Stim2) the degree of sensory decline for touch and mechanical pain was directly correlated with deactivations within S1, whereas networks associated with attentional and cognitive processing showed increased activation. Therefore, our results demonstrate that brain processing underlying pain-induced sensory gain substantially differs from pain-induced sensory decline. A potential neurobiological mechanism of secondary CNS-mediated hypoesthesia and hypoalgesia may involve modification of local inhibitory networks within somatosensory cortices.

Early cortical activities evoked by noxious stimulation in humans

Lasers can selectively activate the nociceptors of A-delta fibers. Since nociceptors in the skin are activated via temperature conduction by the laser beam, a latency jittering of cortical responses among trials would affect results obtained with a conventional averaging (C-AVE) technique. We therefore used a new method, latency-adjusted averaging (L-AVE), to investigate cortical responses to noxious laser stimulation in normal subjects. L-AVE was done by averaging trials after adjusting the latency so that the peak latency of an activity in the temporal region of all trials matched on the time axis. Both in C-AVE and in L-AVE, clear activations were found in the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (SI) and bilateral parasylvian regions, whose activities peaked 163-181 ms after the stimulation. In addition to these three main activities, weak activities peaking at around 109-119 ms could be identified in only L-AVE in similar cortical regions. Since the direction of the source differed between early and main activities, we considered that the early weak activities were cancelled out by the later main activities with an opposite orientation. The results suggested that early cortical processing of noxious information occurs earlier than previous neurophysiological studies have estimated and that the temporal sequence of activations should be reconsidered.

Brain activity associated with painfully hot stimuli applied to the upper limb: a meta-analysis

The capacity of pain to alert against potential injury or focus attention on damaged tissue is enhanced by the intrinsically aversive nature of the experience. Finding methods to relieve pain will ultimately be facilitated by deeper understanding of the processes that contribute to the experience, and functional brain imaging has contributed substantially toward that end. An impressive body of literature has identified a distributed network of pain-related activity in the brain that is subject to considerable modulation by different stimulus parameters, contextual factors, and clinical conditions. The fundamental substrates of the pain network are yet to be distilled from the highly variable results of studies published thus far. Qualitative reviews of the pain-imaging literature have been contributory, but lack the greater surety of quantitative methods. We employ the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analytic technique to establish the most consistent activations among studies reporting brain responses subsequent to the application of noxious heat. A network of pain-related activity was replicated for stimuli to either upper limb that included two discernible regions of the mid-anterior cingulate cortex, bilateral thalami, insula, and opercula cortices, posterior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, supplementary motor area, and cerebellum. The findings of the meta-analysis resonate with other streams of information that continue to enhance our understanding of pain in the brain. The results also point toward new areas of research that may be fruitful for the exploration of central pain processing.

Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease

CONTEXT

The perception of pain due to an acute injury or in clinical pain states undergoes substantial processing at supraspinal levels. Supraspinal, brain mechanisms are increasingly recognized as playing a major role in the representation and modulation of pain experience. These neural mechanisms may then contribute to interindividual variations and disabilities associated with chronic pain conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature regarding how activity in diverse brain regions creates and modulates the experience of acute and chronic pain states, emphasizing the contribution of various imaging techniques to emerging concepts.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and PRE-MEDLINE searches were performed to identify all English-language articles that examine human brain activity during pain, using hemodynamic (PET, fMRI), neuroelectrical (EEG, MEG) and neurochemical methods (MRS, receptor binding and neurotransmitter modulation), from January 1, 1988 to March 1, 2003. Additional studies were identified through bibliographies.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected based on consensus across all four authors. The criteria included well-designed experimental procedures, as well as landmark studies that have significantly advanced the field.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixty-eight hemodynamic studies of experimental pain in normal subjects, 30 in clinical pain conditions, and 30 using neuroelectrical methods met selection criteria and were used in a meta-analysis. Another 24 articles were identified where brain neurochemistry of pain was examined. Technical issues that may explain differences between studies across laboratories are expounded. The evidence for and the respective incidences of brain areas constituting the brain network for acute pain are presented. The main components of this network are: primary and secondary somatosensory, insular, anterior cingulate, and prefrontal cortices (S1, S2, IC, ACC, PFC) and thalamus (Th). Evidence for somatotopic organization, based on 10 studies, and psychological modulation, based on 20 studies, is discussed, as well as the temporal sequence of the afferent volley to the cortex, based on neuroelectrical studies. A meta-analysis highlights important methodological differences in identifying the brain network underlying acute pain perception. It also shows that the brain network for acute pain perception in normal subjects is at least partially distinct from that seen in chronic clinical pain conditions and that chronic pain engages brain regions critical for cognitive/emotional assessments, implying that this component of pain may be a distinctive feature between chronic and acute pain. The neurochemical studies highlight the role of opiate and catecholamine transmitters and receptors in pain states, and in the modulation of pain with environmental and genetic influences.

CONCLUSIONS

The nociceptive system is now recognized as a sensory system in its own right, from primary afferents to multiple brain areas. Pain experience is strongly modulated by interactions of ascending and descending pathways. Understanding these modulatory mechanisms in health and in disease is critical for developing fully effective therapies for the treatment of clinical pain conditions.

Event-related fMRI with painful electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve

Several functional brain imaging studies of pain using positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have shown that painful stimulation causes activation of different brain areas. The aim of the present study was to develop and implement painful stimulation of the trigeminal nerve, which can be applied with event-related paradigms by using MRI. Twelve healthy, right-handed volunteers were examined. Painful electrical stimulation of the first trigeminal branch was performed. In an event-related setting with a 1.5 T clinical scanner with EPI capability, the following fMRI parameters were used: 20 slices, 3 mm thickness, isotropic voxel, 306 measurements with 54 randomized events. Statistical postprocessing was performed with SPM99. Activation of the ipsi- and contralateral secondary somatosensory cortex (SII), and the contralateral insular cortex was observed as well as a contralateral thalamic activation (T=4.45, extension 15 voxels). Six of the 12 volunteers revealed also activation of the cingulate cortex. The investigation demonstrates that painful stimulation of the trigeminal nerve activates the contralateral insular cortex, SII, and thalamus, as well as the ipsilateral SII. In contrast to other studies, the cingulate cortex was only activated inconsistently.

Dissociation of neural representation of intensity and affective valuation in human gustation

We used a 2 x 2 factorial design to dissociate regions responding to taste intensity and taste affective valence. Two intensities each of a pleasant and unpleasant taste were presented to subjects during event-related fMRI scanning. The cerebellum, pons, middle insula, and amygdala responded to intensity irrespective of valence. In contrast, valence-specific responses were observed in anterior insula/operculum extending into the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). The right caudolateral OFC responded preferentially to pleasant compared to unpleasant taste, irrespective of intensity, and the left dorsal anterior insula/operculuar region responded preferentially to unpleasant compared to pleasant tastes equated for intensity. Responses best characterized as an interaction between intensity and pleasantness were also observed in several limbic regions. These findings demonstrate a functional segregation within the human gustatory system. They also show that amygdala activity may be driven by stimulus intensity irrespective of valence, casting doubt upon the notion that the amygdala responds preferentially to negative stimuli.

Functional brain imaging in irritable bowel syndrome with rectal balloon-distention by using fMRI

AIM: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by abdominal pain and changes in stool habits. Visceral hypersensitivity is a key factor in the pathophysiology of IBS. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of rectal balloon-distention stimulus by blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-fMRI) in visceral pain center and to compare the distribution, extent, and intensity of activated areas between IBS patients and normal controls.

METHODS: Twenty-six patients with IBS and eleven normal controls were tested for rectal sensation, and the subjective pain intensity at 90 mL and 120 mL rectal balloon-distention was reported by using Visual Analogue Scale. Then, BOLD-fMRI was performed at 30 mL, 60 mL, 90 mL, and 120 mL rectal balloon-distention in all subjects.

RESULTS: Rectal distention stimulation increased the activity of anterior cingulate cortex (35/37), insular cortex (37/37), prefrontal cortex (37/37), and thalamus (35/37) in most cases. At 120 mL of rectal balloon-distention, the activation area and percentage change in MR signal intensity of the regions of interest (ROI) at IC, PFC, and THAL were significantly greater in patients with IBS than that in controls. Score of pain sensation at 90 mL and 120 mL rectal balloon-distention was significantly higher in patients with IBS than that in controls.

CONCLUSION: Using fMRI, some patients with IBS can be detected having visceral hypersensitivity in response to painful rectal balloon-distention. fMRI is an objective brain imaging technique to measure the change in regional cerebral activation more precisely. In this study, IC and PFC of the IBS patients were the major loci of the CNS processing of visceral perception.

Somatotopic activation in the human trigeminal pain pathway

Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to image pain-associated activity in three levels of the neuraxis: the medullary dorsal horn, thalamus, and primary somatosensory cortex. In nine subjects, noxious thermal stimuli (46 degrees C) were applied to the facial skin at sites within the three divisions of the trigeminal nerve (V1, V2, and V3) and also to the ipsilateral thumb. Anatomical and functional data were acquired to capture activation across the spinothalamocortical pathway in each individual. Significant activation was observed in the ipsilateral spinal trigeminal nucleus within the medulla and lower pons in response to at least one of the three facial stimuli in all applicable data sets. Activation from the three facial stimulation sites exhibited a somatotopic organization along the longitudinal (rostrocaudal) axis of the brain stem that was consistent with the classically described "onion skin" pattern of sensory deficits observed in patients after trigeminal tractotomy. In the thalamus, activation was observed in the contralateral side involving the ventroposteromedial and dorsomedial nuclei after stimulation of the face and in the ventroposterolateral and dorsomedial nuclei after stimulation of the thumb. Activation in the primary somatosensory cortex displayed a laminar sequence that resembled the trigeminal nucleus, with V2 more rostral, V1 caudal, and V3 medial, abutting the region of cortical activation observed for the thumb. These results represent the first simultaneous imaging of pain-associated activation at three levels of the neuraxis in individual subjects. This approach will be useful for exploring central correlates of plasticity in models of experimental and clinical pain.

Central processing of rectal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: an fMRI study

OBJECTIVES

In healthy subjects, the neural correlates of visceral pain bear much similarity with the correlates of somatic pain. In patients with irritable bowel syndrome, the central nervous system is believed to play a strong modulatory or etiological role in the pathophysiology of the disease. We hypothesize that this role must be reflected in aberrations of central functional responses to noxious visceral stimulation in these patients. To verify this hypothesis, we have induced transient rectal pain in patients and assessed the functional responses of the brain by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS

Twelve right-handed patients (11 female) were examined. Functional imaging (1.5 T) was performed following a block paradigm, alternating epochs with and without noxious stimulation of the rectum. Rectal pain was induced by inflating a latex balloon. Whole-brain coverage was achieved by means of echo-planar magnetic resonance acquisition.

RESULTS

A strong variability of the individual responses to rectal pain was found in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Significant activations were found in only two patients, and group analysis did not reveal significant activations. In contrast, all patients exhibited significant deactivations. Group analysis revealed significant deactivations within the right insula, the right amygdala, and the right striatum.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals aberrant functional responses to noxious rectal stimulation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Those results add grounds to the hypothesis that the central nervous system plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of this syndrome.

fMRI of thermal pain: effects of stimulus laterality and attention

Brain activity was studied by fMRI in 18 healthy subjects during stimulation of the thenar eminence of the hand with either warm (non-painful, 40 degrees C) or hot (painful, 46-49 degrees C) stimuli using a contact thermode. Experiments were performed on the right and left hand independently and with two attentional contexts: subjects either attended to pain or attended to a visual global motion discrimination task (to distract them from pain). Group analysis demonstrated that attended warm stimulation of the right hand did not produce any significantly activated clusters. Painful thermal stimulation of either hand elicited significant activity over a large network of brain regions, including insula, inferior frontal gyrus, cingulate gyrus, secondary somatosensory cortex, cerebellum, and medial frontal gyrus (corrected P < 0.05). Insula activity was distributed along its anterior-posterior axis and depended on the hand stimulated and attentional context. In particular, activity within the posterior insula was contralateral to the site of stimulation, tested using regions of interest (ROI) analysis: significant side x site interaction (P = 0.001). With attention diverted from the painful stimulus bilateral anterior insula activity moved posteriorly to midinsula and decreased in extent (ROI analysis: significant main effect of attention (P = 0.03)). The role of the insula in thermosensation and attention is discussed.

Distraction modulates anterior cingulate gyrus activations during the cold pressor test

The anterior cingulate gyrus (ACG) is part of a neural network implicated in attention-demanding tasks, such as the experience of pain. However, the regions within the ACG responding to cognitive demands and to painful stimulation are not identical. Since directing attention away from a painful stimulus is known to reduce the perceived pain intensity, we hypothesized that distraction from pain would result both in decreased activation of ACG subregions responsive to painful stimulation and increased activation of ACG subregions responsive to the distraction task. BOLD fMRI has comparatively high spatial resolution and allows for better identification of ACG subregional responses than other neuroimaging techniques. Twelve subjects were tested using the cold pressor test (CPT), a verbal attention task (VAT), and a distraction task (DT) (a combination of the CPT and VAT). Analysis was performed on a voxel-by-voxel basis using a general linear model as implemented in SPM99. In addition to ACG activations common to both the CPT and VAT, we identified one CPT-specific cluster in an area corresponding to BA24'. The modulation effect of distraction on pain was assessed by contrasting (CPT-DT) and (DT-CPT). In support of our hypothesis, contrast (CPT-DT) revealed a decrease in BA24' during the DT and contrast (DT-CPT) showed increased activation in BA32/32'. These data suggest that distraction from pain and concomitant low pain ratings are reflected in distinct ACG subregional responses.

Differential coding of pain intensity in the human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex

The primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices have been shown to participate in human pain processing. However, in humans it is unclear how SI and SII contribute to the encoding of nociceptive stimulus intensity. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG) we recorded responses in SI and SII in eight healthy humans to four different intensities of selectively nociceptive laser stimuli delivered to the dorsum of the right hand. Subjects' pain ratings correlated highly with the applied stimulus intensity. Activation of contralateral SI and bilateral SII showed a significant positive correlation with stimulus intensity. However, the type of dependence on stimulus intensity was different for SI and SII. The relation between SI activity and stimulus intensity resembled an exponential function and matched closely the subjects' pain ratings. In contrast, SII activity showed an S-shaped function with a sharp increase in amplitude only at a stimulus intensity well above pain threshold. The activation pattern of SI suggests participation of SI in the discriminative perception of pain intensity. In contrast, the all-or-none-like activation pattern of SII points against a significant contribution of SII to the sensory-discriminative aspects of pain perception. Instead, SII may subserve recognition of the noxious nature and attention toward painful stimuli.

Imaging the pain of low back pain: functional magnetic resonance imaging in combination with monitoring subjective pain perception allows the study of clinical pain states

Most brain imaging studies of pain are done using a two-state subtraction design (state-related design). More recently event-related functional magnetic reasonance imaging (fMRI) has also been used for studying pain. Both designs severely limit the application of the technology to clinical pain states. Recently we demonstrated that monitoring time fluctuations of perceived pain could be used with fMRI to identify brain regions involved in conscious, subjective perception of pain. Here we extend the methodology to demonstrate that the same approach can be used to study clinical pain states. Subjects are equipped with a finger-spanning device to continuously rate and log their perceived pain during fMRI data collection. These ratings are convolved with a canonical hemodynamic response function to generate predictor waveforms with which related brain activity can be identified. Chronic low back pain patients and a normal volunteer were used. In one series of fMRI scans the patient simply lies in the scanner and indicates spontaneous fluctuations of the subjective pain. In other fMRI scans, a straight-leg raising procedure is performed to exacerbate the back pain. In the normal volunteer, fMRI scans were done during painful and non-painful straight-leg raisings. The results indicate the feasibility of differentiating between different pain states. We argue that the approach can be generalized to identify brain circuitry underlying diverse clinical pain conditions.

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pain Consciousness: Cortical Networks of Pain Critically Depend on What is Implied by "Pain"

Brain imaging studies, using primarily functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), are reviewed. These studies are aimed at developing imaging approaches that can be used in the clinical setting to investigate clinically relevant pain states. To this end, our recent studies indicate that by taking advantage of the temporal variations in pain perception, we are able to identify cortical regions that may be uniquely involved in pain consciousness. This procedure in turn becomes a general approach with which clinical pain states can be studied. Preliminary results are shown in patients suffering from chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) and chronic back pain. The review emphasizes that different experimental pain states, and chronic and acute clinical pain states, seem to involve dramatically different networks, the details of which remain to be worked out. It is concluded that these procedures need to be applied in the larger clinical setting in which multicentered studies may be conducted to begin building the brain pain network atlas.

Segregation of nociceptive and non-nociceptive networks in the squirrel monkey somatosensory thalamus

The somatosensory thalamus (here we examine neurons in the caudal cutaneous portion of ventral posterior lateral nucleus, VPL) is composed of a somatotopic arrangement of anteroposteriorly oriented rods. Each rod is a collection of neurons with homogeneous properties that relay sensory information to specific cortical columns. We developed a multi-electrode recording technique, using fixed-geometry four-tip electrodes that allow simultaneous recordings from small populations of neurons (4-11), in a approximately 150 x 150 x 150 micrometer(3) volume of brain tissue (i.e., the approximate diameter of rods) and study of their spatiotemporal interactions. Due to the fixed geometry of the four-tip electrodes, the relative locations of these neurons can be determined, and due to the simultaneity of the recordings, their spike-timing coordination can be calculated. With this method, we demonstrate the existence of two distinct functional networks: nociceptive and non-nociceptive networks. The population dynamics of these two types of networks are different: cross-correlations in each type of network were different in direction and strength, were a function of the distance between neurons, had an opponent organization for nociceptive networks and a non-opponent organization for non-nociceptive networks, and rapidly changed under different stimulus conditions independent of changes in firing rates. A simple neural network model mimicked these physiological findings, demonstrating the necessity of inhibitory interneurons and different amounts of afferent input synchronization. Based on these results, we conclude that the somatosensory thalamus is composed of two modules, nociceptive and non-nociceptive rods, and that the response dynamics differences between these modules are due to spatiotemporal differences of their afferent inputs.