Identifying low-grade cellular rejection after heart transplantation in children by using gene expression profiling

Relationship between donor fraction cell-free DNA and clinical rejection in heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Clinical rejection (CR) defined as decision to treat clinically suspected rejection with change in immunotherapy based on clinical presentation with or without diagnostic biopsy findings is an important part of care in heart transplantation. We sought to assess the utility of donor fraction cell-free DNA (DF cfDNA) in CR and the utility of serial DF cfDNA in CR patients in predicting outcomes of clinical interest.

METHODS

Patients with heart transplantation were enrolled in two sequential, multi-center, prospective observational studies. Blood samples were collected for surveillance or clinical events. Clinicians were blinded to the results of DF cfDNA.

RESULTS

A total of 835 samples from 269 subjects (57% pediatric) were included for this analysis, including 28 samples associated with CR were analyzed. Median DF cfDNA was 0.43 (IQR 0.15, 1.36)% for CR and 0.10 (IQR 0.07, 0.16)% for healthy controls (p < .0001). At cutoff value of 0.13%, the area under curve (AUC) was 0.82, sensitivity of 0.86, specificity of 0.67, and negative predictive value of 0.99. There was serial decline in DF cfDNA post-therapy, however, those with cardiovascular events (cardiac arrest, need for mechanical support or death) showed significantly higher levels of DF cfDNA on Day 0 (2.11 vs 0.31%) and Day 14 (0.51 vs 0.22%) compared to those who did not have such an event (p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

DF cfDNA has excellent agreement with clinical rejection and, importantly, serial measurement of DF cfDNA predict clinically significant outcomes post treatment for rejection in these patients.

Transcriptomic heterogeneity of antibody mediated rejection after heart transplant with or without donor specific antibodies

BACKGROUND

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is an increasingly studied cause of graft failure after heart transplantation. AMR diagnosis previously required the detection of circulating donor specific antibodies (DSA); however, the most recent criteria only require pathological findings. This classification defined a subset of patients with AMR, yet without known antibodies. Here, we sought to evaluate differences in the transcriptome profile associated with different types of AMR.

METHODS

RNA sequencing was used on endomyocardial biopsies to analyze and compare transcriptomic profiles associated with different subtypes of AMR defined by immunopathological and histopathological findings, as well as the presence or absence of DSA. Gene expression profiles were characterized for each diagnostic group.

RESULTS

The most divergent gene expression profiles were observed between patients with or without DSA. AMR subtypes associated with DSA showed expression of signature genes involved in monocyte activation and response to interferon. There was also substantial difference between the transcriptomic profiles of AMR defined by histopathological and immunopathological findings, the latter being associated with expression of mucin genes. In contrast, there was no differential RNA expression between patients with pAMR1i without DSA and those without AMR. Likewise, no differential expression was observed between patients with pAMR1h with DSA and pAMR2.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our studies reveal different expression profiles in endomyocardial biopsies in relation to some key criteria used to diagnose AMR. These findings support the view that the diagnosis of AMR encompasses several phenotypes that may rely on distinct mechanisms of injury.

Non-invasive cardiac allograft rejection surveillance: reliability and clinical value for prevention of heart failure

Allograft rejection-related acute and chronic heart failure (HF) is a major cause of death in heart transplant recipients. Given the deleterious impact of late recognized acute rejection (AR) or non-recognized asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection on short- and long-term allograft function improvement of AR surveillance and optimization of action strategies for confirmed AR can prevent AR-related allograft failure and delay the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, which is the major cause for HF after the first posttransplant year. Routine non-invasive monitoring of cardiac function can improve both detection and functional severity grading of AR. It can also be helpful in guiding the anti-AR therapy and timing of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs). The combined use of EMBs with non-invasive technologies and methods, which allow detection of subclinical alterations in myocardial function (e.g., tissue Doppler imaging and speckle-tracking echocardiography), reveal alloimmune activation (e.g., screening of complement-activating donor-specific antibodies and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA) and help in predicting the imminent risk of immune-mediated injury (e.g., gene expression profiling, screening of non-HLA antibodies, and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA), can ensure the best possible surveillance and management of AR. This article gives an overview of the current knowledge about the reliability and clinical value of non-invasive cardiac allograft AR surveillance. Particular attention is focused on the potential usefulness of non-invasive tools and techniques for detection and functional grading of early and late ARs in asymptomatic patients. Overall, the review aimed to provide a theoretical and practical basis for those engaged in this particularly demanding up-to-date topic.

Correlation of gene expression profiling score, cardiac hemodynamics and echocardiographic parameters in asymptomatic, rejection-free pediatric heart transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

To correlate gene expression profiling scores obtained by AlloMap^® with cardiac hemodynamics, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and echocardiographic parameters in asymptomatic, rejection-free pediatric heart transplant (HT) recipients.

METHODS

Single-institution retrospective study of 210 AlloMap scores obtained concomitantly with cardiac catheterization and echocardiogram from 55 children during follow-up after cardiac transplantation.

RESULTS

The median age at HT was 5.1 years (range, 0.9-14.1), with 29 males and 26 females. AlloMap scores were high in <2 years vs ≥2 years of age at the time of HT (P = .001), and trending higher with time after HT (R²  = .04, P = .004). There was no significant difference in scores between ACR grades 0 and 1R or CAV. There was mild to modest correlation of AlloMap scores with the mean right atrial pressure (P = .002), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (P = .02), but no correlation was found with LV SF% (P = .3), LV EF% (P = .5), or RV FAC % (P = .8).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides preliminary data that the AlloMap score must be studied carefully before it can be used in children, particularly in those under 2 years of age. Monitoring of serial scores for each patient could potentially reflect changes in allograft performance that may determine indications for catheterization and biopsy which needs to be validated in future studies.