Risk-taking behavior for HIV acquisition during pregnancy in Porto Alegre, Brazil

Cesarean delivery and risk of HIV vertical transmission in Southern Brazil, 2008-2018

BACKGROUND

Childbirth via cesarean delivery can prevent intrapartum vertical transmission for women who are not virally suppressed at the time of delivery. Few studies have compared cesarean delivery trends between women living with HIV and women without HIV and have examined the role of cesarean delivery in the prevention of vertical transmission in the era of potent combination antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that the cesarean delivery rate is high in women living with HIV compared with women without HIV and that cesarean delivery usage decreases over time among women living with HIV with advances in combined antiretroviral therapy in a country with a high national cesarean delivery rate. This study aimed (1) to evaluate cesarean delivery trends in women with and without HIV and (2) to examine its role in preventing vertical transmission among women living with HIV in a setting of free, universal combined antiretroviral therapy coverage in a retrospective cohort of nearly 56,000 deliveries at a major referral institution in a city with the highest prevalence of maternal HIV in Brazil.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from maternal-infant pairs from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, were extracted. Cesarean delivery rates were compared using the Pearson chi-square test. Cesarean delivery predictors were evaluated by multivariate log-linear Poisson regression using a generalized estimating equations approach. HIV viral suppression was defined as a viral load of <1000 copies/ml at delivery. HIV vertical transmission was determined following national guidelines.

RESULTS

Over 11 years, 48,688 pregnancies occurred in 40,375 women; HIV seroprevalence was 2.7%; 18,886 cesarean deliveries (38.8%) were performed; 47.7% of women living with HIV and 38.6% of women without HIV underwent cesarean delivery (P<.001). Although HIV was associated with cesarean delivery (adjusted relative risk, 1.17 [95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.29]), women living with HIV with vertical transmission achieved similar cesarean delivery rates (36.7%) as women without HIV (39.8%) in 2018. Cesarean delivery in women living with HIV with an unknown viral load at delivery (42.6%) did not increase over time. HIV vertical transmission rate was 2.2%, the highest in women living with HIV with an unknown viral load (8.4%) vs women living with HIV without vertical transmission (4.1%) and women living with HIV with vertical transmission (0.5%) (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

In the HIV epicenter of Brazil, women living with HIV with vertical transmission had fewer surgical deliveries, likely because of the use of potent combination antiretroviral therapy. Nearly half of the women living with HIV with an unknown viral load did not undergo cesarean delivery, a potential missed opportunity for the prevention of HIV vertical transmission.

Patterns of pregnancy loss among women living with and without HIV in Brazil, 2008-2018

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy loss is poorly understood, but infection may be a risk factor. Few studies have evaluated pregnancy loss among women living with HIV in the era of potent combination antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that maternal HIV and syphilis infection lead to increased risk of pregnancy loss, including both miscarriage and stillbirth. This study aimed to assess trends and possible predictors of spontaneous miscarriage and stillbirth among women living with HIV in a cohort of nearly 56,000 deliveries at a major referral institution in a city with the highest prevalence of HIV in Brazil.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from hospital records for women delivering from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018 were reviewed. Rates of stillbirth, miscarriage, and any pregnancy loss were compared using the Pearson chi-square test. Predictors of pregnancy loss were evaluated by robust univariate log-linear Poisson regression using a generalized estimating equations approach.

RESULTS

A total of 55,844 pregnancies were included in the analysis, with 54,308 pregnancies from 43,502 women without HIV and 1536 pregnancies from 1186 women living with HIV (seroprevalence of maternal HIV: 2.7%). Overall, 1130 stillbirths (2.0%) and 6558 miscarriages (11.7%) occurred. Any pregnancy loss was similar in both groups (13.8% in women without and 14.1% in women with HIV; P=.733). Stillbirth was higher among women living with HIV (3.4%) than among women without HIV (2.0%; P<.001), but there was no difference in overall miscarriage rates (10.7% in women with vs. 11.8% in women without HIV; P=.188). Women living with HIV had higher miscarriage rates between 12 and 20 weeks than women without HIV (34.8% vs 23.7%; P=.001), likely because of syphilis coinfection. Stillbirth rates were higher for women living with HIV from 2008 to 2014; however, a steady plateau was reached from 2014 to 2018, mirroring stillbirth rates in women without HIV. Maternal HIV infection did not increase the risk of miscarriage (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.05) or any pregnancy loss (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.15), but was associated with stillbirth (relative risk, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.21). Maternal syphilis was associated with any pregnancy loss (relative risk, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.38) and stillbirth (relative risk, 3.39; 95% confidence interval, 2.77-4.14), but not miscarriage (relative risk, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.04).

CONCLUSION

In the era of combination antiretroviral therapy, there was no difference in miscarriage rates between women with and without HIV. HIV was associated with stillbirth risk but improved over time. Maternal syphilis was significantly associated with any pregnancy loss and stillbirth in all women. Syphilis is likely the main driver of pregnancy loss in women living with HIV in Brazil.

Barriers and facilitators for men to attend prenatal care and obtain HIV voluntary counseling and testing in Brazil

Background

Providing HIV voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) to men who attend their partner's prenatal care is an intervention with potential to reduce HIV transmission to women and infants during the vulnerable period of pregnancy. Little is known about the acceptability of this intervention in global settings outside of Africa.

Methods

We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews to evaluate potential barriers and facilitators to prenatal care attendance for HIV VCT with 20 men who did and 15 men who did not attend prenatal care with their partners at Hospital Conceiçao in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Men were recruited at the labor and delivery unit at Hospital Conceiçao via a scripted invitation while visiting their newborn infant. Interviews lasted from 35–55 minutes and were conducted in Portuguese by a local resident trained extensively in qualitative methods. All interviews were transcribed verbatim, translated, and then analyzed using Atlast.ti software. An analysis of themes was then conducted using direct quotes and statements. We applied and adapted the AIDS Risk Reduction Theoretical Model and HIV Testing Decisions Model to the qualitative data to identify themes in the 35 interviews.

Results

If offered HIV testing during prenatal care, all men in both groups stated they would accept this intervention. Yet, individual, relationship and systemic factors were identified that affect these Brazilian men's decision to attend prenatal care, informing our final conceptual model. The men interviewed had a general understanding of the value of HIV prevention of mother to child transmission. They also described open and communicative relationships with their significant others and displayed a high level of enthusiasm towards optimizing the health of their expanding family. The major barriers to attending prenatal care included perceived stigma against HIV infected individuals, men’s lack of involvement in planning of the pregnancy as well as inconvenient scheduling of prenatal care, due to conflicting work schedules.

Conclusions

Brazilian men displayed high levels of HIV-related knowledge as well as open communication about HIV testing; especially when compared to findings from African studies. Future efforts should reorient prenatal care towards providing care to the entire family with a clear focus on protecting the infant from preventable diseases. Formally inviting men to prenatal care and providing them an acceptable medical excuse from work may enhance male involvement.

Where does treatment optimism fit in? Examining factors associated with consistent condom use among people receiving antiretroviral treatment in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

In the era of highly active antiretrovirals, people living with HIV (PLWH) have resumed sexual activity in the context of longer and healthier lives, and thus the chances of transmitting the HIV virus, as well as the potential to be re-infected also increase. HIV treatment optimism has been found to be associated with sexual risk behaviors among PLWH in different settings. A cross sectional survey was conducted to examine the relationship between treatment optimism, safer sex burnout and consistent condom use as well as variables associated with treatment optimism in a sample of PLWH on antiretrovirals (ARVs) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (n = 604). Seventy-two percent of participants always used a condom in the last 6 months. Homosexual, bisexual, transexual persons were less likely to use condoms consistently than heterosexuals (AOR .58 CI .42-.78). Those who were treatment optimistic (AOR .46 CI .25-.88) were more likely not use a condom consistently in the past 6 months, as were participants who reported safer sex burnout (AOR .58 CI .36-.90). Sexual orientation, safer sex burnout, and lower education levels were significantly associated with higher treatment optimism in multivariate analysis. Study findings highlight the need to address psychosocial factors such as treatment optimism and safer sex burnout associated with lower consistent condom use among PLWH in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.