1
|
Kanahara N, Kimura H, Kinoshita T, Iyo M, Takekita Y. Efficacy of Asenapine in Drug-resistant Psychotic Patients with Dopamine Supersensitivity Psychosis: Two Cases. CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN COLLEGE OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 2023; 21:197-201. [PMID: 36700326 PMCID: PMC9889895 DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2023.21.1.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Dopamine supersensitivity psychosis (DSP) is an unstable clinical condition observed in individuals with schizophrenia who have been treated with an antipsychotic medication at a high dosage and/or for a long period. An up-regulation of dopamine D2 receptors (DRD2) is thought to be involved in the essential pathology of DSP. An antipsychotic agent with both tight binding to DRD2 and a long half-life is generally effective for treating DSP, but a patient who meets the criteria of treatment-resistant schizophrenia sometimes needs treatment with clozapine. We report the case details of two patients whose DSP was not controlled with several antipsychotics but was successfully controlled with asenapine. Asenapine binds to a broad range of dopamine receptors and serotonin receptors, and it is thus distinct from other atypical antipsychotics. The unique profile of asenapine may contribute to the control of severe DSP symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhisa Kanahara
- Division of Medical Treatment and Rehabilitation, Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan,Address for correspondence: Nobuhisa Kanahara Division of Medical Treatment and Rehabilitation, Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuou-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 260-8670, Japan, E-mail: , ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-8003
| | - Hiroshi Kimura
- Department of Psychiatry, Gakuji-kai Kimura Hospital, Chiba, Japan,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan,Department of Psychiatry, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Masaomi Iyo
- Department of Psychiatry, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
González-Rodríguez A, Monreal JA, Natividad M, Seeman MV. Seventy Years of Treating Delusional Disorder with Antipsychotics: A Historical Perspective. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123281. [PMID: 36552037 PMCID: PMC9775530 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
For many decades, delusional disorder (DD) has been considered a treatment-resistant disorder, with antipsychotics acknowledged as the best, though imperfect, treatment. It is possible that the discovery of the right drug could turn treatment resistance into treatment response. The goal of this narrative review is to provide a historical perspective of the treatment of DD since the introduction of antipsychotics 70 years ago. The following search terms were used to scan the literature: antipsychotics AND "delusional disorder". Findings were that therapy for DD symptoms has changed over time. Initial reports suggested that the drug of choice was the antipsychotic pimozide, and that this drug was especially effective for the somatic subtype of DD. Subsequent studies demonstrated that other antipsychotics, for instance, risperidone and olanzapine, were also highly effective. Treatment response may vary according to the presence or absence of specific symptoms, such as cognitive defect and depression. Clozapine, partial D2 agonists, and long-acting injectable drugs may be more effective than other drugs, but the evidence is not yet in. Because of the absence of robust evidence, treatment guidelines for the optimal management of DD are not yet available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre González-Rodríguez
- Department of Mental Health, Mutua Terrassa University Hospital, Fundació Docència I Recerca Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona (UB), CIBERSAM, 5 Dr Robert Square, 08221 Terrassa, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | - José A. Monreal
- Department of Mental Health, Mutua Terrassa University Hospital, Fundació Docència I Recerca Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona (UB), CIBERSAM, 5 Dr Robert Square, 08221 Terrassa, Spain
- Institut de Neurociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08221 Terrassa, Spain
| | - Mentxu Natividad
- Department of Mental Health, Mutua Terrassa University Hospital, Fundació Docència I Recerca Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona (UB), CIBERSAM, 5 Dr Robert Square, 08221 Terrassa, Spain
| | - Mary V. Seeman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 605 260 Health Street West, Toronto, ON M5P 3L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies that examine course and outcome in psychosis have reported considerable heterogeneity in terms of recovery, remission, employment, symptom presentation, social outcomes, and antipsychotic medication effects. Even with demonstrated heterogeneity in course and outcome, prophylactic antipsychotic maintenance therapy remains the prominent practice, particularly in participants with schizophrenia. Lack of efficacy in maintenance antipsychotic treatment and concerns over health detriments gives cause to re-examine guidelines. METHODS This study was conducted as part of the Chicago follow-up study designed as a naturalistic prospective longitudinal research study to investigate the course, outcome, symptomatology, and effects of antipsychotic medication on recovery and rehospitalization in participants with serious mental illness disorders. A total of 139 participants with 734 observations were included in the analysis. GEE logistic models were applied to adjust for confounding factors measured at index hospitalization and follow-ups. RESULTS Our data show that the majority of participants with schizophrenia or affective psychosis experience future episodes of psychosis at some point during the 20-year follow-up. There was a significant diagnostic difference between groups showing an increase in the number of future episodes of psychosis in participants with schizophrenia. Participants with schizophrenia not on antipsychotics after the first 2 years have better outcomes than participants prescribed antipsychotics. The adjusted odds ratio of not on antipsychotic medication was 5.989 (95% CI 3.588-9.993) for recovery and 0.134 (95% CI 0.070-0.259) for rehospitalization. That is, regardless of diagnosis, after the second year, the absence of antipsychotics predicted a higher probability of recovery and lower probability of rehospitalization at subsequent follow-ups after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSION This study reports multiple findings that bring into question the use of continuous antipsychotic medications, regardless of diagnosis. Even when the confound by indication for prescribing antipsychotic medication is controlled for, participants with schizophrenia and affective psychosis do better than their medicated cohorts, strongly confirming the importance of exposing the role of aiDSP and antipsychotic drug resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Harrow
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas H Jobe
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Liping Tong
- Advocoate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dopamine, Serotonin, and Structure/Function Brain Defects as Biological Bases for Treatment Response in Delusional Disorder: A Systematic Review of Cases and Cohort Studies. Behav Sci (Basel) 2021; 11:bs11100141. [PMID: 34677234 PMCID: PMC8533520 DOI: 10.3390/bs11100141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Although blockade of dopamine receptors D2 and D3 appears to be the main mechanism of antipsychotic action, treatment response variability calls for an examination of other biological systems. Our aim is to systematically review reports of treatment response in delusional disorder (DD) in order to help determine its biological bases. Computerized searches of ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Scopus databases (from 1999 to September 2021) were systematically reviewed, in keeping with PRISMA directives. We used the search terms: (treat * OR therap * AND (delusional disorder)). We included all studies that explored the biological mechanisms of treatment response in DD, as diagnosed by ICD or DSM criteria. A total of 4344 records were initially retrieved, from which 14 papers were included: case reports, case series, and cohort studies. Findings point to (1) dopaminergic dysfunction (based on biochemical and genetic studies), (2) serotonergic dysfunction (based on partial agonism/antagonism of drugs), and (3) brain structure/function impairment, especially in the temporal and parietal lobes, as crucial factors in treatment response. Further studies with higher levels of evidence are needed to help clinicians determine treatment.
Collapse
|
5
|
Takao N, Murai T, Fujiwara H. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia characterised by dopamine supersensitivity psychosis and efficacy of asenapine. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14:e242495. [PMID: 33849886 PMCID: PMC8051386 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-242495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Dopamine supersensitivity psychosis (DSP) frequently arises with long-term antipsychotic treatment and accounts for a significant proportion of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The mechanism underlying DSP is thought to be a compensatory increase in dopamine receptor density in the striatum caused by long-term antipsychotic treatment. Previous animal studies have reported that antipsychotics increase serotonin 5-HT2A receptor density in the striatum and that 5-HT2A receptor blockers suppress dopamine-sensitive psychomotor activity, which may be linked to the pathophysiology of DSP. In this paper, we describe a patient who was hospitalised with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Following treatment with high-dose antipsychotic polypharmacy for 10 weeks, the patient experienced worsening of psychotic and extrapyramidal symptoms. The patient was then started on second-generation antipsychotic asenapine while other antipsychotics were tapered off, resulting in improvement of these symptoms. Retrospectively, we presumed that the high-dose antipsychotic polypharmacy caused DSP, which was effectively treated by the potent 5-HT2A receptor antagonism of asenapine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nagara Takao
- Psychiatry, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Musselman M, Faden J, Citrome L. Asenapine: an atypical antipsychotic with atypical formulations. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol 2021; 11:20451253211035269. [PMID: 34540197 PMCID: PMC8442490 DOI: 10.1177/20451253211035269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Asenapine is a second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic medication not available in a pill that can be swallowed; rather, it is commercialized in sublingual and transdermal formulations. This is a consequence of extensive first-pass metabolism if ingested. The sublingual formulation is approved in many jurisdictions for the treatment of schizophrenia and manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder and is available generically. The efficacy profile is well characterized in a number of clinical trials, including an off-label use for the management of agitation. Obstacles to its use include food and drink restrictions, twice-daily dosing and adverse effects such as dysgeusia (distorted, altered, or unpleasant taste) and oral hypoesthesia (numbness). Transdermal asenapine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. Efficacy was established in a registrational study examining acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia. The patch needs to changed once daily. Obstacles to its use include the potential for skin reactions such as erythema and pruritis, and being a branded product, it is more costly than other options. This is a narrative review of the chemistry and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of asenapine, as well as summarizing the efficacy and tolerability of both sublingual and transdermal asenapine, and its possible place in treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Musselman
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, 100 E. Lehigh Avenue, Suite 305B, Philadelphia, PA 19125, USA
| | - Justin Faden
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chouinard G, Samaha AN, Chouinard VA, Peretti CS, Kanahara N, Takase M, Iyo M. Antipsychotic-Induced Dopamine Supersensitivity Psychosis: Pharmacology, Criteria, and Therapy. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS 2018. [PMID: 28647739 DOI: 10.1159/000477313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The first-line treatment for psychotic disorders remains antipsychotic drugs with receptor antagonist properties at D2-like dopamine receptors. However, long-term administration of antipsychotics can upregulate D2 receptors and produce receptor supersensitivity manifested by behavioral supersensitivity to dopamine stimulation in animals, and movement disorders and supersensitivity psychosis (SP) in patients. Antipsychotic-induced SP was first described as the emergence of psychotic symptoms with tardive dyskinesia (TD) and a fall in prolactin levels following drug discontinuation. In the era of first-generation antipsychotics, 4 clinical features characterized drug-induced SP: rapid relapse after drug discontinuation/dose reduction/switch of antipsychotics, tolerance to previously observed therapeutic effects, co-occurring TD, and psychotic exacerbation by life stressors. We review 3 recent studies on the prevalence rates of SP, and the link to treatment resistance and psychotic relapse in the era of second-generation antipsychotics (risperidone, paliperidone, perospirone, and long-acting injectable risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole). These studies show that the prevalence rates of SP remain high in schizophrenia (30%) and higher (70%) in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We then present neurobehavioral findings on antipsychotic-induced supersensitivity to dopamine from animal studies. Next, we propose criteria for SP, which describe psychotic symptoms and co-occurring movement disorders more precisely. Detection of mild/borderline drug-induced movement disorders permits early recognition of overblockade of D2 receptors, responsible for SP and TD. Finally, we describe 3 antipsychotic withdrawal syndromes, similar to those seen with other CNS drugs, and we propose approaches to treat, potentially prevent, or temporarily manage SP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Chouinard
- Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Program, McGill University Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|