Blockade of glutamate release by botulinum neurotoxin type A in humans: a dermal microdialysis study

Botulinum toxin type A is a potential therapeutic drug for chronic orofacial pain

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A), produced by the gram-positive anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botulinum, acts by cleaving synaptosome-associated protein-25 (SNAP-25), an essential component of the presynaptic neuronal membrane that is necessary for fusion with the membrane proteins of neurotransmitter-containing vesicles. Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of BTX-A in treating chronic pain conditions, including lower back pain, chronic neck pain, neuropathic pain, and trigeminal neuralgia, particularly when patients are unresponsive to traditional painkillers. This review focuses on the analgesic effects of BTX-A in various chronic pain conditions, with a particular emphasis on the orofacial region.

HIGHLIGHT

This review focuses on the mechanisms by which BTX-A induces analgesia in patients with inflammatory and temporomandibular joint pain. This review also highlights the fact that BTX-A can effectively manage neuropathic pain and trigeminal neuralgia, which are difficult-to-treat chronic pain conditions. Herein, we present a comprehensive assessment of the central analgesic effects of BTX-A and a discussion of its various applications in clinical dental practice.

CONCLUSION

BTX-A is an approved treatment option for various chronic pain conditions. Although there is evidence of axonal transport of BTX-A from peripheral to central endings in motor neurons, the precise mechanism underlying its pain-modulating effects remains unclear. This review discusses the evidence supporting the effectiveness of BTX-A in controlling chronic pain conditions in the orofacial region. BTX-A is a promising therapeutic agent for treating pain conditions that do not respond to conventional analgesics.

Therapeutic Options for Migraines in the Microsurgical Patient: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

There exists an increasing array of treatments proposed to prevent, alleviate, and abort symptoms of a migraine; however, for patients who undergo reconstructive microsurgery, caution must be taken to preserve vascular integrity. This study is the first-to-date scoping review of vascular and bleeding risk of current migraine therapies, with the purpose of identifying potential therapeutic agents for postoperative migraine management appropriate for microsurgical patients.

METHODS

Currently available migraine therapeutics were compiled from the UpToDate software system and the American Academy of Family Physicians. A PubMed literature review was performed for each therapeutic's effect on bleeding or vascular involvement. Data were compiled into tables of abortive, symptom-controlling and prophylactic, and nonpharmacologic treatments. Expert microsurgeons reviewed the data to provide recommendations for optimized patient care.

RESULTS

Triptans and other ergot derivatives demonstrated strong evidence of vasoconstriction and were greatly advised against for immediate postmicrosurgical use. Novel pharmaceutical therapies such as lasmiditan and calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists have no literature indicating potential for vasoconstriction or hematoma and remain an investigational option for abortive medical treatment. For symptom control, acetaminophen appears the safest option, with clinical judgment and further research needed for use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Alternative treatment techniques may include migraine prophylaxis with botulinum toxin injection or nutraceutical treatment by means of magnesium supplementation or coenzyme Q10 administration, minimizing the need for additional medication in the postoperative setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing reconstructive microsurgery have a unique medical profile limiting the therapeutic options available to treat migraines. This review provides preliminary evidence to be considered as a guide for prescribing therapeutics for migraine in the postoperative setting.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the analgesic effects of botulinum neurotoxin: A literature review

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), derived from Clostridium botulinum, have been employed to treat a range of central and peripheral neurological disease. Some studies indicate that BoNT may be beneficial for pain conditions as well. It has been hypothesized that BoNTs may exert their analgesic effects by preventing the release of pain-related neurotransmitters and neuroinflammatory agents from sensory nerve endings, suppressing glial activation, and inhibiting the transmission of pain-related receptors to the neuronal cell membrane. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that the central analgesic effects of BoNTs are mediated through their retrograde axonal transport. The purpose of this review is to summarize the experimental evidence of the analgesic functions of BoNTs and discuss the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which they can act on pain conditions. Most of the studies reviewed in this article were conducted using BoNT/A. The PubMed database was searched from 1995 to December 2022 to identify relevant literature.

Clinical efficacy of escitalopram combined with botulinum toxin A in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and comorbid headache

BACKGROUND

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a common mental disorder that happens comorbidly with other diseases. Headache is a common anxiety comorbidity. Previous reports have shown that the selection of therapeutic drugs for GAD patients and comorbid headache is challenging. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of escitalopram combined with botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) in patients with GAD and comorbid headache and seek an alternative treatment strategy for the comorbidity of GAD and headache.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized controlled, double-blind study was performed. The eligible GAD patients with comorbid headache were randomly assigned to the BoNT/A group and the placebo group. All the patients were given oral escitalopram therapy (10-20 mg/day) for the whole duration of the study. The BoNT/A group was given local injections of BoNT/A (50 U per person), whereas the placebo group was given local saline (0.9% NaCl) injections at the beginning and 3 months after the experiments. All participants were followed up for 6 months and relevant information was collected at months 0, 1, 2, 3, and 6. Primary outcomes included the following: (1) the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7); (2) the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS); (3) the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scales (HAMA); (4) days with headache per month; (5) visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients (the sex ratio of female to male: 3.39:1) were finally included. Compared with the placebo group, the BoNT/A group showed a significant decrease in GAD-7 scores, SAS scores, HAMA scores, days with headache per month, and VAS scores at months 1, 2, 3, and 6 of follow-up (all p < 0.05). The average time to complete remission of anxiety symptoms (HAMA< 7 points) in the BoNT/A group was less than the placebo group (2 months vs. 3 months). At the same time, the results of the survival analysis showed a clear beneficial effect of BoNT/A relative to placebo on the time to remission of anxiety (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Mean daily doses of escitalopram at the sixth month in the BoNT/A group was smaller than the placebo group (12.5 mg vs. 16.04 mg, p < 0.001). The number of patients who relapsed (HAMA total score ≥ 14 points) at 6 months of follow-up in the BoNT/A group was less than the placebo group (2.2% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.05). The rates of response (HAMA subtraction rate ≥ 50%) were 93.8% for the BoNT/A group and 75.5% for the placebo group (p < 0.05), and the rates of remission (HAMA < 7 points) were 87.5% for the BoNT/A group and 64.2% for the placebo group (p < 0.01) at the sixth month.

CONCLUSION

The combination of escitalopram with BoNT/A is a significantly effective intervention in improving clinical efficacy and reducing the recurrence in patients with GAD and comorbid headache, and we believe that this approach will be an additional treatment strategy for future treatment of comorbid headache in GAD. Therefore, we recommend that escitalopram combined with BoNT/A should be given as early as possible in GAD patients and comorbid headache.

Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type A on the Nociceptive and Lemniscal Somatosensory Systems in Chronic Migraine: An Electrophysiological Study

(1) Background: OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) is a commonly used prophylactic treatment for chronic migraine (CM). Although randomized placebo studies have shown its clinical efficacy, the mechanisms by which it exerts its therapeutic effect are still incompletely understood and debated. (2) Methods: We studied in 15 CM patients the cephalic and extracephalic nociceptive and lemniscal sensory systems using electrophysiological techniques before and 1 and 3 months after one session of pericranial BoNT-A injections according to the PREEMPT protocol. We recorded the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR), the trigemino-cervical reflex (nTCR), the pain-related cortical evoked potential (PREP), and the upper limb somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP). (3) Results: Three months after a single session of prophylactic therapy with BoNT-A in CM patients, we found (a) an increase in the homolateral and contralateral nBR AUC, (b) an enhancement of the contralateral nBR AUC habituation slope and the nTCR habituation slope, (c) a decrease in PREP N-P 1st and 2nd amplitude block, and (d) no effect on SSEPs. (4) Conclusions: Our study provides electrophysiological evidence for the ability of a single session of BoNT-A injections to exert a neuromodulatory effect at the level of trigeminal system through a reduction in input from meningeal and other trigeminovascular nociceptors. Moreover, by reducing activity in cortical pain processing areas, BoNT-A restores normal functioning of the descending pain modulation systems.

How Does Botulinum Toxin Inhibit Itch?

Two decades after reports of the anti-pruritic effects of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), there is still no approved product for the anti-itch indication of BoNTs, and most clinical case reports still focus on the off-label use of BoNTs for various itchy conditions. Few randomized clinical trials have been conducted with controversial results, and the beneficial effects of BoNTs against itch are mainly based on case studies and case series. These studies are valuable in presenting the potential application of BoNTs in chronic pruritic conditions, but due to the nature of these studies, they are categorized as providing lower levels of evidence or lower grades of recommendation. To obtain approval for the anti-pruritic indication of BoNTs, higher levels of evidence are required, which can be achieved through conducting large-scale and well-designed studies with proper control groups and established careful and reliable primary and secondary outcomes. In addition to clinical evidence, presenting the mechanism-based antipruritic action of BoNTs can potentially strengthen, accelerate, and facilitate the current efforts towards further investments in accelerating the field towards the potential approval of BoNTs for itchy conditions. This review, therefore, aimed to provide the state-of-the-art mechanisms underlying the anti-itch effect of BoNTs from basic studies that resemble various clinical conditions with itch as a hallmark. Evidence of the neuronal, glial, and immune modulatory actions of BoNTs in reducing the transmission of itch are presented, and future potential directions are outlined.

Analgesic potential of different available commercial brands of botulinum neurotoxin-A in formalin-induced orofacial pain in mice

The use of botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) is an alternative for the management of orofacial pain disorders. Although only Botox has labeled, there are other commercial brands available for use, among them: Dysport, Botulift, Prosigne, and Xeomin. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the possible differences in the antinociceptive effect evoked by different commercially available formulations of BoNT-A in an animal model of inflammatory orofacial pain induced by formalin injection. Male C57/BL6 mice (20–25 g) were submitted to the pre-treatment with five different commercial brands of BoNT-A (Botox, Botulift, Xeomin, Dysport, or Prosigne; with doses between 0.02 and 0.2 Units of Botulinum Toxin, in 20 μL of 0.9% saline) three days prior the 2% formalin injection. All injections were made subcutaneously into the right perinasal area. After formalin injections, nociceptive behaviors like rubbing the place of injection were quantified during the neurogenic (0–5 min) and inflammatory (15–30 min) phases. The treatment using Botox, Botulift, and Xeomin were able to induce antinociceptive effects in both phases of the formalin-induced pain animal model, however, Dysport and Prosigne reduced the response in neither of them. Our data suggest that the treatment using different formulations of BoNT-A is not similar in efficacy as analgesics when evaluated in formalin-induced orofacial pain in mice.

•

Botulinum neurotoxin-a reduced formalin-induced orofacial pain in mice.

•

There are differences in the analgesic potential of different available commercial brands of botulinum neurotoxin-A.

•

Botox, Botulift, Xeomin demonstrated analgesic effect when evaluated in formalin-induced orofacial pain in mice.

SNAP-25 Contributes to Neuropathic Pain by Regulation of VGLuT2 Expression in Rats

Synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25) plays an important role in neuropathic pain. However, the underlying mechanism is largely unknown. Vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGluT2) is an isoform of vesicular glutamate transporters that controls the storage and release of glutamate. In the present study, we found the expression levels of VGluT2 correlated with the upregulation of SNAP-25 in the spinal cord of rats following chronic constriction injury (CCI)-induced neuropathic pain. Cleavage of SNAP-25 by Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) attenuated mechanical allodynia, downregulated the expression of VGluT2 and reduced glutamate release. Overexpression of VGluT2 abolished the antinociceptive effect of BoNT/A. Upregulation of SNAP-25 in naive rats increased VGluT2 expression and induced pain-responsive behaviors. In pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells, the expression of VGluT2 was also depended on SNAP-25 dysregulation. Moreover, we found VGluT2 was involved in SNAP-25-mediated regulation of astrocyte expression and activation of the PKA/p-CREB pathway mediated the upregulation of SNAP-25 in neuropathic pain. The findings of our study indicate that VGluT2 contributes to the effect of SNAP-25 in maintaining the development of neuropathic pain and suggests a novel mechanism underlying SNAP-25 regulation of neuropathic pain.

Using Botulinum Toxin A for Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome-Possible Pathomechanisms and Practical Issues

Treatment for patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is always challenging for urologists. The main mechanism of the botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is inhibition of muscle contraction, but the indirect sensory modulation and anti-inflammatory effect in the bladder also play important roles in treating patients with IC/BPS. Although current guidelines consider BoNT-A injection to be a standard treatment, some practical issues remain debatable. Most clinical evidence of this treatment comes from retrospective uncontrolled studies, and only two randomized placebo-control studies with limited patient numbers have been published. Although 100 U BoNT-A is effective for most patients with IC/BPS, the potential efficacy of 200 U BoNT-A has not been evaluated. Both trigone and diffuse body BoNT-A injections are effective and safe for IC/BPS, although comparison studies are lacking. For IC/BPS patients with Hunner’s lesion, the efficacy of BoNT-A injection remains controversial. Most patients with IC/BPS experience symptomatic relapse at six to nine months after a BoNT-A injection, although repeated injections exhibit a persistent therapeutic effect in long-term follow-up. Further randomized placebo-controlled studies with a larger number of patients are needed to support BoNT-A as standard treatment for patients with IC/BPS.

Perineural injection of botulinum toxin-A in painful peripheral nerve injury - a case series: pain relief, safety, sensory profile and sample size recommendation

Objectives: Subcutaneous injection of botulinum toxin-A (sBONT-A) is a novel treatment for peripheral neuropathic pain. While its analgesic effects are well documented, this treatment is often not comfortable and fails in patients who show signs of sensory loss but rarely allodynia. There are some case reports about perineural BONT-A injection (pBONT-A) which could be an alternative approach. Here we present a retrospective, open label case series of pBONT-A's efficacy and safety regarding neurological consequences involving changes in somatosensory profiles of both responders and non-responders. Methods: Sixty patients (53 ± 13years, 77% males) with PNI were treated with pBONT-A after a test injection with a local anesthetic, which prompted distinctive pain relief. Quantitative sensory testing (QST; DFNS protocol) and pain intensity were assessed before and ≥7 days post pBONT-A injection. Definition of response: satisfactory pain reduction of ≥30% NRS (numerical rating scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) for ≥4 days. Statistics: Paired t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, χ² test. Results: A temporary weak paresis in one case was clinically verified. The QST -parameters remained unchanged, but patients with more frequent hyperalgesia signs reported less analgesia (p = .04). The pBONT-A injection prompted pain relief by 24.8% (NRS: 6.0 ± 1.7 vs. 4.5 ± 2.1; p < .0001); 57% (n = 34) were responders (NRS: 6.0 ± 1.6 vs. 3.4 ± 1.6, relief of 43.4%; p < .0001). Based on these results, we suggest that future parallel design trials on pBONT-A need to include at least 84 patients. Discussion: Ultrasound-guided pBONT-A injection seems to be a safe treatment leading to a sufficient pain relief for some months without sensory changes. Surprisingly, pBONT-A showed a pronounced analgesic effect also in patients without signs of hyperalgesia.

Mechanisms of Botulinum Toxin Type A Action on Pain

Already a well-established treatment for different autonomic and movement disorders, the use of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) in pain conditions is now continuously expanding. Currently, the only approved use of BoNT/A in relation to pain is the treatment of chronic migraines. However, controlled clinical studies show promising results in neuropathic and other chronic pain disorders. In comparison with other conventional and non-conventional analgesic drugs, the greatest advantages of BoNT/A use are its sustained effect after a single application and its safety. Its efficacy in certain therapy-resistant pain conditions is of special importance. Novel results in recent years has led to a better understanding of its actions, although further experimental and clinical research is warranted. Here, we summarize the effects contributing to these advantageous properties of BoNT/A in pain therapy, specific actions along the nociceptive pathway, consequences of its central activities, the molecular mechanisms of actions in neurons, and general pharmacokinetic parameters.

Amplification of glyceryl trinitrate-induced headache features by noxious craniofacial stimuli in pain-free healthy humans

AIM

Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) provokes an immediate migraine-like headache, followed by a delayed migraine attack in migraineurs. In healthy volunteers, only an immediate, less severe and shorter headache occurs. The presence of an already sensitized nervous system in migraineurs may underlie the more intense and prolonged GTN-evoked headaches. We tested if in healthy humans, application of noxious cutaneous and/or mechanical stimulation within craniofacial region would enhance or prolong GTN-evoked headache.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Noxious stimuli with a capsaicin patch on forehead, a mechanical headband, or both were applied prior to sublingual GTN (0.5 mg) in 20 healthy volunteers. GTN-induced headache characteristics and sensory responsiveness were recorded.

RESULTS

A more intense GTN-evoked headache was produced following application of headband.

CONCLUSION

Noxious mechanical stimulation prior to GTN resulted in a more intense GTN-evoked headache.

Current treatment strategies in refractory chronic pruritus

Chronic pruritus is a highly prevalent, debilitating disease, which is often refractory to conventional therapies. A step-wise, guideline-driven approach should be adopted in the management of these patients. Emollients as well as topical corticosteroids if appropriate should be initiated whilst looking for the cause underlying the pruritus. If these measures fail, and the origin of the pruritus remains unknown, cannot be treated or does not respond to therapy, systemic therapies as for example gabapentinoids, antidepressants, mu-opioid-receptor antagonists or, in case of inflammatory conditions, immunosuppressive drugs should be recommended. Novel agents, especially systemic monoclonal antibodies, neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists and opioid receptor modulators, are promising in providing relief in refractory cases.

Botulinum neurotoxin type A combined with functional electrical stimulation for upper-limb poststroke spasticity with pain

Stroke is a complicated condition that leaves stroke survivors with prolonged disability. Common poststroke conditions are spasticity and pain, which directly affect daily activities and quality of life in these patients. Botulinum neurotoxin type A is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for upper-limb spasticity. It reduces muscle tone and improves basic upper-limb activities. Functional electrical stimulation is also used widely as a therapeutic modality in the upper-limb muscle rehabilitation. Here, we present a case in which Botulinum neurotoxin type A injections combined with functional electrical stimulation were applied for upper-limb spasticity accompanied with pain in a poststroke patient.

Botulinum toxin: A review of the mode of action in migraine

Botulinum toxin serotype A (BoNT/A) was originally used in neurology for the treatment of dystonia and blepharospasms, but is now clinically used worldwide for the treatment of chronic migraine. Still, the possible mode of action of BoNT/A in migraine is not fully known. However, the mode of action of BoNT/A has been investigated in experimental pain as well as migraine models, which may elucidate the underlying mechanisms in migraine. The aim of this study was to review studies on the possible mode of action of BoNT/A in relation to chronic migraine treatment. Observations suggest that the mode of action of BoNT/A may not be limited to the injection site, but also includes anatomically connected sites due to axonal transport. The mechanisms behind the effect of BoNT/A in chronic migraine may also include modulation of neurotransmitter release, changes in surface expression of receptors and cytokines as well as enhancement of opioidergic transmission. Clinical and experimental studies with botulinum toxin in the last decade have advanced our understanding of headache and other pain states. More research into botulinum toxin as treatment for headache is warranted as it can be an attractive alternative for patients who do not respond positively to other drugs.

Antipruritic Effects of Botulinum Neurotoxins

This review explores current evidence to demonstrate that botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) exert antipruritic effects. Both experimental and clinical conditions in which botulinum neurotoxins have been applied for pruritus relief will be presented and significant findings will be highlighted. Potential mechanisms underlying antipruritic effects will also be discussed and ongoing challenges and unmet needs will be addressed.

Intra-articular onabotulinumtoxinA in osteoarthritis knee pain: effect on human mechanistic pain biomarkers and clinical pain

OBJECTIVES

OnabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) attenuates peripheral nociceptive transduction and consequently neuronal firing. The aim of this mechanistic study was to evaluate the effect of intra-articular (IA) onabotA in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHOD

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week trial using a single ultrasound-guided IA injection of onabotA (200 U). Patients (N = 121) were randomized to receive onabotA (n = 61) or placebo (n = 60). Mechanistic pain biomarkers and clinical outcomes were used for profiling the effect. The biomarkers were pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) from the knee joint (localized sensitization) and extra-articular sites (widespread sensitization), and wind-up pain (central sensitization). Clinical assessments included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), average daily pain (ADP), patient global impression of change (GIC), and rescue medication. The painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) was used for subgrouping patients (nociceptive, neuropathic, and mixed/uncertain).

RESULTS

The nociceptive and non-nociceptive groups were identical with respect to all baseline data. No significant differences in clinical efficacy parameters were found between onabotA and placebo in the entire population. The nociceptive group showed significant improvement after IA onabotA at week 8 for all WOMAC outcomes, ADP at weeks 9 and 10, and patient GIC at week 12, and significant reduction in rescue medication counts within each 14-day period at weeks 9 and 10. After 4, 8, and 12 weeks, significant correlations were obtained in the onabotA group between ADP (both the entire group and the nociceptive group) and various sensitization parameters. The nociceptive group showed pronounced effects on widespread sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular onabotA given to patients with nociceptive knee OA reduced pain sensitization together with improvement in pain and function.

Botulinum Toxin Type a as a Therapeutic Agent against Headache and Related Disorders

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) is a toxin produced by the naturally-occurring Clostridium botulinum that causes botulism. The potential of BoNT/A as a useful medical intervention was discovered by scientists developing a vaccine to protect against botulism. They found that, when injected into a muscle, BoNT/A causes a flaccid paralysis. Following this discovery, BoNT/A has been used for many years in the treatment of conditions of pathological muscle hyperactivity, like dystonias and spasticities. In parallel, the toxin has become a “glamour” drug due to its power to ward off facial wrinkles, particularly frontal, due to the activity of the mimic muscles. After the discovery that the drug also appeared to have a preventive effect on headache, scientists spent many efforts to study the potentially-therapeutic action of BoNT/A against pain. BoNT/A is effective at reducing pain in a number of disease states, including cervical dystonia, neuropathic pain, lower back pain, spasticity, myofascial pain and bladder pain. In 2010, regulatory approval for the treatment of chronic migraine with BoNT/A was given, notwithstanding the fact that the mechanism of action is still not completely elucidated. In the present review, we summarize experimental evidence that may help to clarify the mechanisms of action of BoNT/A in relation to the alleviation of headache pain, with particular emphasis on preclinical studies, both in animals and humans. Moreover, we summarize the latest clinical trials that show evidence on headache conditions that may obtain benefits from therapy with BoNT/A.

Botulinum Toxin as a Pain Killer: Players and Actions in Antinociception

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) have been widely used to treat a variety of clinical ailments associated with pain. The inhibitory action of BoNTs on synaptic vesicle fusion blocks the releases of various pain-modulating neurotransmitters, including glutamate, substance P (SP), and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), as well as the addition of pain-sensing transmembrane receptors such as transient receptor potential (TRP) to neuronal plasma membrane. In addition, growing evidence suggests that the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of BoNTs are mediated through various molecular pathways. Recent studies have revealed that the detailed structural bases of BoNTs interact with their cellular receptors and SNAREs. In this review, we discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms related to the efficacy of BoNTs in alleviating human pain and insights on engineering the toxins to extend therapeutic interventions related to nociception.