Renal transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus: outcome and prognostic factors in 50 cases from a single centre

Kidney transplant outcomes in children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Literature supports equivalent kidney transplant outcomes in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with those without SLE. However, there are conflicting and scant data on kidney transplant outcomes, as well as controversy over optimal timing of transplantation, in children and adolescents with SLE.

METHODS

Analysis included kidney-only transplant recipients aged 2-21 years from 2000 to 2017 enrolled in the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN). The relationship between diagnosis (SLE n = 457, non-SLE glomerular disease n = 4492, and non-SLE non-glomerular disease n = 5605) and transplant outcomes was evaluated. The association between dialysis time and outcomes was analyzed in the SLE group only.

RESULTS

In adjusted models, SLE had higher mortality compared with non-SLE glomerular recipients (HR 1.24 CI 1.07-1.44) and non-glomerular recipients (HR 1.42 CI 1.20-1.70). SLE was associated with higher graft failure compared with non-SLE glomerular (HR 1.42 CI 1.20-1.69) and non-glomerular disease (HR 1.67 CI 1.22-2.28). SLE had a higher risk of acute rejection at 1 year compared with non-glomerular disease (HR 1.39 CI 1.03-1.88). There was a decreased risk of delayed graft function compared with non-SLE glomerular disease (HR 0.54, CI 0.36-0.82). There were no significant associations between dialysis time and transplant outcomes in the SLE group.

CONCLUSION

SLE in children and adolescents is associated with worse patient and graft survival compared with non-SLE diagnoses. Outcomes in children and adolescents with SLE are not associated with dialysis time. Further studies are needed to assess implications of potential earlier transplantation and shorter time on dialysis prior to transplantation.

Kidney transplantation outcomes in lupus nephritis: A 37-year single-center experience from Latin America

OBJECTIVE

We assessed patient and graft outcomes and prognostic factors in kidney transplantation in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) secondary to lupus nephritis (LN) undergoing kidney transplantation from August 1977 to December 2014 in a Latin American single center.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was patient survival, and the secondary endpoints were death-censored graft survival for the first renal transplant and the rate of recurrent LN (RLN). Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Factors predicting patient and death-censored graft survivals were examined by Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses.

RESULTS

185 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patient survival rates were 88% at one year, 82% at three years, 78% at five years, and 67% at ten years. Death-censored graft survival for the first renal transplant was 93% at one year, 89% at three years, 87% at five years, and 80% at ten years. RLN was diagnosed in 2 patients (1.08%), but no graft was lost because of RLN. Thirty-nine (21.1%) patients died, and 65 (35.1%) patients experienced graft loss during the follow-up. By multivariable analyses, older recipient age and 1-month posttransplantation eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73m² were associated with lower patient survival and an increased risk of graft loss, while induction immunosuppressive therapy exerted a protective effect on patients' survival. In the subgroup of patients in whom disease activity was measured at the time of transplantation, a higher SLEDAI score was also associated with lower patient survival and an increased risk of graft loss.

CONCLUSION

In a mostly Mestizo population, kidney transplantation is an excellent therapeutic alternative in LN patients with ESKD. Older recipient age, an eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73m² at one month posttransplantation, and disease activity at the time of transplantation are predictive of a lower patient and death-censored graft survival, while induction immunosuppressive therapy has a protective effect on patient survival. RLN is rare and does not influence the risk of graft loss.

Recurrence of disease following organ transplantation in autoimmune liver disease and systemic lupus erythematosus

Disease recurrence after organ transplantation associated with graft failure is a major clinical challenge in autoimmune diseases. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) are the three most common (autoimmune liver diseases) ALD for which liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment option for patients with end-stage diseases. Although the 5- and 10-year survival rates of post-LT patients are remarkable (80-84% and 71-79% in PBC, 73-87% and 58-83% in PSC, 76-79% and 67-77% respectively in AIH patients), post-LT disease recurrence is not uncommon. Here, we summarize literature findings on disease recurrence of these ALD with emphasis on the incidence, risk factors and impact on long-term outcome. We noted that the incidence of disease recurrence varies between studies, which ranges from 53% to 10.9% in PBC, 8.2% to 44.7% in PSC and 7% to 42% in AIH. The variations are likely due to differences in study design, such as sample size, duration of studies and follow up time. This is further compounded by the lack of precise clinical diagnosis criteria and biomarkers of disease recurrence in these ALD, variation in post-LT treatment protocols to prevent disease recurrence and a multitude of risk factors associated with these ALD. While recurrence of PBC and AIH does not significantly impact long term outcome including overall survival, recurrent PSC patients often require another LT. Renal transplantation, like LT, is the treatment of choice in patients with end-stage lupus nephritis. While calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and immunosuppressive drugs have improved the survival rate, post-transplant recurrence of lupus nephritis from surveillance-biopsy proven lupus nephritis range from 30% to 44%. On the other hand, recurrence of post-transplant lupus nephritis from registry survey analysis were only 1.1% to 2.4%. In general, risk factors associated with an increased frequency of post-transplant recurrence of autoimmune diseases are not clearly defined. Large scale multi-center studies are needed to further define guidelines for the diagnosis and clinical management to minimize disease recurrence and improve outcomes of post-transplant patients.

Lupus Nephritis and Kidney Transplantation: Where Are We Today?

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) for 1.9% of the ESKD population in the United States. Although the incidence rates of ESKD from LN stopped rising in recent years, racial disparities in waiting time, pre-emptive kidney transplant, and transplant outcomes still exist. Patients with LN who progress to ESKD tend to be female, of African ancestry, and young. Kidney transplantation is safe in this population and associated with a substantial survival benefit, primarily due to reduced deaths from cardiovascular disease and infection. Transplant outcomes for patients with ESKD due to LN are similar to those without LN.

Outcome and Prognosis of Patients With Lupus Nephritis Submitted to Renal Transplantation

This stydy aimed to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical profile and outcome of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) submitted to renal transplantation. Retrospective cohort study based on the records of 35 LN patients submitted to renal transplantation at a single center in Brazil between July 1996 and May 2016. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 6-month, 1-year and 5-year graft survival. The sample included 38 transplantations (3 of which retransplantations). The mean age at the time of SLE diagnosis was 23.7 ± 9.0 years. Most patients were female (94.7%) and 68.4% were non-Caucasian. Twenty-two (57.9%) underwent renal biopsy prior to transplantation. The mean time from SLE diagnosis to transplantation was 10.3 ± 6.4 years. The mean pre-transplantation dialysis time was 3.8 ± 3.7 years. The grafts came from living related (n = 11) or deceased (n = 27) donors. Three (7.9%) patients experienced acute rejection in the first year. Graft and patient survival rates were, respectively, 97.1% and 100% at 6 months, 84.9% and 96.9% at 1 year, and 76.3% and 92.5% at 5 years. One (2.6%) patient had SLE recurrence. Venous thrombosis (p = 0.017) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (p = 0.036) were more prevalent in patients with graft loss. In our cohort of LN patients submitted to renal transplantation, the 5-year survival rate was high, and APS was an important predictor of poor renal outcome (graft loss).

Renal transplantation for lupus nephritis: non-adherence and graft survival

OBJECTIVES

Poor adherence to immunosuppressive treatment is common in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and may identify those with lupus nephritis (LN) who have a poorer prognosis. Non-adherence has also been reported to be a potential adverse outcome predictor in renal transplantation (rTp). We investigated whether non-adherence is associated with increased rTp graft rejection and/or failure in patients with LN.

METHODS

Patients with LN undergoing rTp in two major London hospitals were retrospectively included. Medical and electronic records were reviewed for documented concerns of non-adherence as well as laboratory biochemical drug levels. The role of non-adherence and other potential predictors of graft rejection/failure including demographics, comorbidities, age at systemic lupus erythematosus and LN diagnosis, type of LN, time on dialysis prior to rTp and medication use were investigated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Out of 361 patients with LN, 40 had rTp. During a median follow-up of 8.7 years, 17/40 (42.5%) of these patients had evidence of non-adherence. A total of 12 (30.0%) patients experienced graft rejection or failure or both. In the adherent group 2/23 (8.7%) had graft rejection, whilst in the non-adherent this rose to 5/17 (29.4%, p = 0.11). Graft failure was seen in 5/23 (21.7%) patients from the adherent group and 4/17 (23.5%) in the non-adherent group ( p = 0.89). Non-adherent patients had a trend towards increased graft rejection, hazard ratio 4.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-26.12, p = 0.11. Patients who spent more time on dialysis prior to rTp were more likely to be adherent to medication, p = 0.01.

CONCLUSION

Poor adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is common and has been shown to associate with a trend towards increased graft failure in patients with LN requiring rTp. This is the first paper to report that shorter periods on dialysis prior to transplantation might lead to increased non-adherence in lupus patients.

Renal Transplantation and Survival Among Patients With Lupus Nephritis: A Cohort Study

Background

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to lupus nephritis (LN) have high rates of premature death.

Objective

To assess the potential effect on survival of renal transplant among patients with ESRD due to LN (LN-ESRD) in the United States.

Design

Nationwide cohort study.

Setting

United States Renal Data System, the national database of nearly all patients with ESRD.

Participants

Patients with incident LN-ESRD who were waitlisted for a renal transplant.

Measurements

First renal transplant was analyzed as a time-varying exposure. The primary outcomes were all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of these outcomes associated with renal transplant in the primary analysis. Sequential cohort matching was used in a secondary analysis limited to patients with Medicare, which allowed assessment of time-varying covariates.

Results

During the study period, 9659 patients with LN-ESRD were waitlisted for a renal transplant, of whom 5738 (59%) had a transplant. Most were female (82%) and nonwhite (60%). Transplant was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.33]) among waitlisted patients. Adjusted HRs for cause-specific mortality were 0.26 (CI, 0.23 to 0.30) for cardiovascular disease, 0.30 (CI, 0.19 to 0.48) for coronary heart disease, 0.41 (CI, 0.32 to 0.52) for infection, and 0.41 (CI, 0.31 to 0.53) for sepsis.

Limitation

Unmeasured factors may contribute to the observed associations; however, the E-value analysis suggested robustness of the results.

Conclusion

Renal transplant was associated with a survival benefit, primarily due to reduced deaths from cardiovascular disease and infection. The findings highlight the benefit of timely referral for transplant to improve outcomes in this population.

Primary Funding Source

National Institutes of Health.

Impact of pre-transplant time on dialysis on survival in patients with lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often leading to end-stage renal failure (ESRF) and necessitating renal transplantation (rTp). Optimal timing of rTp in SLE patients with ESRF is uncertain and could potentially affect survival. We investigated the time spent on dialysis before rTp and survival following rTp in a cohort of SLE patients. Retrospective analysis of all adult SLE patients receiving rTp over a 40-year period (1975–2015) in two tertiary UK centres. Cox proportional hazard regression and receiver operator curves (ROC) were used to determine the risk associated with time on dialysis before rTp and other potential predictors. Forty patients (age 35 ± 11 years, 34 female, 15 Caucasian, 15 Afro–Caribbean and 10 South Asian) underwent rTp. During a median follow-up of 104 months (IQR 80,145), eight (20%) patients died and the 5-year survival was 95%. Univariate analysis identified time on dialysis prior to rTp as the only potentially modifiable risk predictor of survival with a hazard ratio of 1.013 for each additional month spent on dialysis (95% CI = 1.001–1.026, p = 0.03). ROC curves demonstrated that > 24 months on dialysis had an adverse effect with sensitivity of 0.875 and specificity 0.500 for death. No other modifiable predictors were significantly associated with mortality, indicating that time on dialysis had an independent effect. Increased time on dialysis pre-transplantation is an independent modifiable risk factor of mortality in this cohort of patients with lupus nephritis.

Long-term survival of kidney grafts in lupus nephritis: a Mexican cohort

Kidney transplant for patients with lupus nephritis (LN) has satisfactory outcomes in studies with short-term or mid-term follow up. Nevertheless, information about long-term outcomes is scarce. We performed a retrospective matched-pair cohort study in 74 LN recipients compared with 148 non-LN controls matched by age, sex, immunosuppressive treatment, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matches, and transplant period in order to evaluate long-term outcomes of kidney transplant in LN recipients. Matched pairs were predominantly females (83%), median age at transplant surgery of 32 years (interquartile range 23–38 years), and 66% received a graft from a living related donor. Among LN recipients, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year graft survival was 81%, 79%, 57% and 51%, respectively, and it was similar to that observed in controls (89%, 78%, 64%, and 56%, respectively). Graft loss (27% vs. 21%, p = 0.24) and overall survival ( p = 0.15) were not different between LN recipients and controls. Also, there was no difference in episodes of immunological rejection, thrombosis, or infection. Only six LN recipients had biopsy-proven lupus recurrence and three of them had graft loss. In a cohort with a long follow up of kidney transplant recipients, LN recipients had similar long-term graft survival and overall outcomes compared with non-lupus recipients when predictors are matched between groups.

Renal transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus: Comparison of graft survival with other causes of end-stage renal disease

INTRODUCTION

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in 10%-30% of patients. Initially systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was a contraindication for kidney transplantation (KT). Today, long-term graft survival remains controversial. Our objective was to compare the survival after KT in patients with SLE or other causes of ESRD.

METHODS

All SLE patients who had undergone KT in a retrospective cohort were included. Renal graft survival was compared with that of 50 controls, matched for age, sex, and year of transplantation. Survival was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier test and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects with SLE were included. The estimated 1-year, 2- and 5-year survival rates for patients with SLE were 92%, 66% and 66%. Renal graft survival did not differ between patients with SLE and other causes of ESRD (P=.39). The multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in graft survival between the two groups (hazard ratio, HR=1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-6.61, P=.28). The recurrence rate of LN was 8% and was not associated with graft loss. Acute rejection was the only variable associated with graft loss in patients with SLE (HR=16.5, 95% CI 1.94-140.1, P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal graft survival in SLE patients did not differ from that reported for other causes of ESRD.

Renal outcome after kidney-transplantation in Korean patients with lupus nephritis

We investigated renal outcome of kidney-transplantation in 19 Korean recipients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis and compared it with 18 Korean age- and gender-matched recipients without lupus nephritis who were diagnosed with end-stage renal disease caused by renal diseases other than lupus nephritis in a single centre. We reviewed histological findings of kidneys and calculated cumulative dose of immunosuppressive agents. We assessed renal flare of systemic lupus erythematosus, recurrence of lupus nephritis and graft failure as prognosis. The mean age of recipients with lupus nephritis was 43.5 years and all patients were female. Six patients had class III, 10 had class IV and three had class V. There were no meaningful differences in demographic data, renal replacement modality, cumulative doses of immunosuppressants and prognosis between recipients with and without lupus nephritis. Eight patients experienced renal flare of systemic lupus erythematosus, but there were no cases of recurrence of lupus nephritis or graft failure in recipients with lupus nephritis. Kidney-recipients with class IV lupus nephritis exhibited a lower cumulative renal flare of systemic lupus erythematosus free survival rate than those with class III lupus nephritis. In conclusion, renal outcome of kidney-transplantation in patients with lupus nephritis is similar to that in those without lupus nephritis, and class IV was associated with renal flare of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Outcomes in Renal Transplant Recipients With Lupus Nephritis-A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation is the renal replacement therapy of choice in patients with end-stage lupus nephritis (LN). The aim of this study was to evaluate the early and late outcomes of renal transplantation in LN patients in a single transplant center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study analyzed the clinical data of patients who received a renal transplant (RTx) at Gdańsk Transplantation Centre between January 1999 and December 2014.

RESULTS

There were 1296 RTx performed between January 1999 and December 2014, including 21 RTx in 19 LN patients (mean age 40 ± 10 years, 89% female). During the follow-up period (between 1 month and 10.5 years), 1 patient died of urosepsis and 1 of pneumonia. Three RTx recipients with antiphospholipid syndrome lost 5 kidney allografts, including 3 due to acute rejection (AR) during the first posttransplantation month. Kidney allograft survival median was 64 months. Delayed graft function (DGF) and AR were observed in 48% and 33% vs 31% and 21% of LN patients and other RTx patients, respectively (P = .1 and P = .16 for DGF and AR, respectively). The most common early posttransplantation complications were AR (31%) and perirenal hematomas (29%), and late complications were urinary tract infections (75%). Recurrence of LN in renal allograft was observed in 1 patient and was successfully treated by increasing the basic immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary antiphospholipid syndrome has a major influence on the outcomes of RTx in LN patients. Recurrence of LN has no clinical significance.

Kidney transplantation for end-stage renal disease in lupus nephritis, a very safe procedure: a single Latin American transplant center experience

Background

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most frequent complications of SLE and occurs in up to 50% of cases depending on the studied population. Of these, approximately 20% progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), with the treatment of choice being a kidney transplant.

Objective

The objective of this study was to describe the clinical outcome of patients transplanted due to LN, compared with patients transplanted for other causes, in a Latin American population from the Fundación Valle del Lili in Cali, Colombia.

Methods

Observational, retrospective case study with controls matched by age, sex and type of donor in a single center between 1996 and 2014.

Results

Sixty-five kidney transplants were performed in patients with LN and ESRD. The survival of patients with LN was 98% at 1, 10 and 15 years ( p = .99). For controls by age and sex, survival was also 98% at 15 years post-transplant, and for controls by donor, the survival rate was 100% at 5 years and 98% at 15 years. Graft survival in patients with LN to 1, 5 and 15 years was 92%, 83% and 71%, respectively; for controls by age and sex, it was 90%, 84% and 64%, respectively, and for the controls by donor, it was 89%, 86% and 79%, respectively ( p = .7718). There were no statistically significant differences found in the cumulative incidence of acute graft rejection in the first year, but it was found that acute rejection is a factor that relates to the loss of function of the renal graft ( p = .032). Of the patients transplanted for LN, two (3.1%) experienced a recurrence of the disease. One patient died after a diagnosis of recurrence of LN due to an infection.

Conclusions

Kidney transplantation is a good option for patients with ESRD due to LN. In this Hispanic population, the survival of patients, graft survival, and cumulative incidence of graft rejection are not different from those of other transplanted patients. In addition, recurrence of LN was rare, showing the benefits of renal transplantation in LN patients with ESRD.