Temporal bone fracture causing superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Traumatic Events Preceding the Development of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To describe the features of antecedent head trauma in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

METHODS

An online survey was sent to 450 adult patients who underwent surgical repair for SCDS patients asking questions about the nature of internal or external traumatic events preceding symptoms.

RESULTS

One-hundred and thirty-six patients (avg. age, 51.9 years, 62.8% female) completed the survey, of which 61 (44.9%) described either preceding external head trauma (n = 35, 26%), preceding internal pressure event (n = 33, 25%), or both (8, 6%). Of those endorsing external trauma, 22 (63%) described a singular event (head hit by object (n = 8); head hit ground (n = 5); motor vehicle accident (n = 4); assault (n = 2); other (n = 3). One-third experienced loss of consciousness because of the trauma. For those describing internal pressure events (n = 33), the most common events were heavy physical exertion (9, 27%); pressure changes while flying (6, 18%); coughing, nose blowing with illness (5, 15%); childbirth (5, 15%); and self contained underwater breathing apparatus diving events (3, 9%). The interval between trauma and onset of symptoms averaged 5.6 years (SD, 10.7 years). One-third (n = 19) described onset of symptoms immediately after the external trauma or internal pressure event. Symptoms began on the side ipsilateral to the trauma in 91%. Sound- and pressure-induced vertigo/oscillopsia developed more commonly after external trauma versus internal pressure events (68% and 61% vs 44% and 32%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Trauma or internal pressure-related events precede SCDS symptoms in nearly half of cases, with roughly half of preceding events being external.

Superior canal dehiscence syndrome: A review

Superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) is a vestibular disorder in which the presence of a pathological third window in the labyrinth causes several vestibular and cochlear symptoms. Herein, we review the diagnostic criteria and treatment of SCDS. The cause of SCDS is considered to be congenital or acquired; however, its etiology is not well known. Symptoms: Vertigo and/or oscillopsia induced by loud sounds (Tullio phenomenon) or stimuli that change the middle ear or intracranial pressure (fistula symptoms) with vestibular symptoms and hyperacusis and aural fullness with cochlear symptoms are characteristic clinical complaints of this syndrome. Neurological tests: Vertical-torsional eye movements can be observed when the Tullio phenomenon or fistula symptoms are induced. Conductive hearing loss with both a decrease in the bone conduction threshold at lower frequencies and an increase in the air conduction threshold at lower frequencies may be present on audiometry. Cervical and/or ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are effective in strongly suspecting the presence of a pathologic third window in the labyrinth. Computed tomography (CT) imaging: High-resolution CT findings with multiplanar reconstruction in the plane of the superior semicircular canal consistent with dehiscence indicate SCDS. The Pöschl view along the plane of the superior semicircular canal and the Stenvers view perpendicular to it are recommended as CT imaging conditions. Findings from all three major diagnostic categories (symptoms, neurological tests, and/or CT imaging) are needed to diagnose SCDS. The surgical approaches for SCDS are as follows: the 1) middle cranial fossa approach, 2) transmastoid approach, and 3) round window and oval window reinforcement. Each technique has advantages and disadvantages.

Scuba Diving-Induced Inner-Ear Pathology: Imaging Findings of Superior Semicircular Canal and Tegmen Tympani Dehiscence

BACKGROUND Superior semicircular canal dehiscence is an inner-ear pathology which presents with vertigo, disequilibrium, and hearing loss. Although the exact etiology of superior semicircular canal dehiscence is unknown, it is thought that an increase in middle-ear pressure disrupts a thin overlying temporal bone. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence is frequently seen in association with dehiscence of the tegmen tympani, which overlies the middle ear. Here, we present a case report of a 52-year-old Puerto Rican man with vertigo, dizziness, vomiting, and mild hearing loss associated with superior semicircular canal and tegmen tympani dehiscence after performing improper scuba diving techniques. CASE REPORT A 52-year-old Puerto Rican man presented to the emergency department with vertigo, dizziness, vomiting, and mild hearing loss in the right ear. The symptoms began shortly after scuba diving with inadequate decompression techniques on ascent. He was treated with recompression therapy with mild but incomplete improvement in symptoms. Bilateral temporal magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of segmental dehiscence of the right superior semicircular canal and tegmen tympani. High-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone confirmed right superior semicircular canal and tegmen tympani dehiscence with an intact left inner ear. CONCLUSIONS The increased inner-ear pressure that occurs during scuba diving can lead to dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal and tegmen tympani, causing vertigo and hearing loss. Performance of improper diving techniques can further increase the risk of dehiscence. Therefore, appropriate radiologic evaluation of the inner ear should be performed in such patients.

Post-concussive Dizziness: A Review and Clinical Approach to the Patient

Dizziness is a frequent complaint after head trauma. Among patients who suffer a concussion (mild traumatic brain injury or mTBI), dizziness is second only to headache in symptom frequency. The differential diagnosis of post-concussive dizziness (PCD) can be divided into non-vestibular, central vestibular and peripheral vestibular causes with growing recognition that patients frequently exhibit both central and peripheral findings on vestibular testing. Symptoms that traditionally have been ascribed to central vestibular dysfunction may be due to peripheral dysfunction. Further, our ability to test peripheral vestibular function has improved and has allowed us to identify peripheral disorders that in the past would have remained unnoticed. The importance of the identification of the peripheral component in PCD lies in our ability to remedy the peripheral vestibular component to a much greater extent than the central component. Unfortunately, many patients are not adequately evaluated for vestibular disorders until long after the onset of their symptoms. Among the diagnoses seen as causes for PCD are (1) Central vestibular disorders, (2) Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV), (3) Labyrinthine dehiscence/perilymph fistula syndrome, (4) labyrinthine concussion, (5) secondary endolymphatic hydrops, (6) Temporal bone fracture, and (7) Malingering (particularly when litigation is pending). These diagnoses are not mutually exclusive and PCD patients frequently exhibit a combination of these disorders. A review of the literature and a general approach to the patient with post-concussive dizziness will be detailed as well as a review of the above-mentioned diagnostic categories.

Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of SCDS and treatment approaches have been refined to improve patient outcomes. However, a number of challenges remain. First, there is currently no standardized clinical testing algorithm for quantifying the effects of superior canal dehiscence (SCD). SCDS mimics a number of common otologic disorders and established metrics such as supranormal bone conduction thresholds and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements; although useful in certain cases, have diagnostic limitations. Second, while high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the detection of SCD, a bony defect does not always result in signs and symptoms. Third, even when SCD repair is indicated, there is a lack of consensus about nomenclature to describe the SCD, ideal surgical approach, specific repair techniques, and type of materials used. Finally, there is no established algorithm in evaluation of SCDS patients who fail primary repair and may be candidates for revision surgery. Herein, we will discuss both contemporary and emerging diagnostic approaches for patients with SCDS and highlight challenges and controversies in the management of this unique patient cohort.

Traumatic superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: case report and literature review

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) syndrome was first reported in 1998 by Minor et al. and comprises a spectrum of auditory and vestibular symptoms as a result of 'mobile third window' mechanism. The aetiology of SSCD is debated, but persistent infantile microstructure of the temporal bone was suggested. However, some authors related a 'second event', such as closed head trauma, temporal bone fracture and sudden increase in the intracranial pressure to the precipitation of its symptoms. In this article, we report a patient with a closed head trauma who developed unilateral auditory symptoms. High-resolution computed tomography images were obtained and confirmed bilateral SSCD with the normal middle ear structure. The patient was provided with a monaural hearing aid. Literature was searched for similar case reports or series where head trauma precipitated the symptoms of SSCD in anatomically susceptible individuals.

Thinning or dehiscence of bone in structures of the middle cranial fossa floor in superior semicircular canal dehiscence

BACKGROUND

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a rare inner ear disorder; currently, it is unknown whether the etiopathology underlying this structural irregularity affects neighboring structures. The goal is to investigate the prevalence of bone thinning in areas of the middle cranial fossa (MCF) floor in SSCD and non-SSCD patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 100 patients from March 2011 to June 2017 at a tertiary referral center. 100 patients undergoing 118 SSCD repair surgeries (18 bilateral) were identified. 12 SSCD ears were excluded due to lack of pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans or history of prior SSCD repair at an outside facility. Non-SSCD ears were identified from routinely-obtained CT scans for temporal bone fracture (fractured sides excluded) for a total of 101 ears; 26 non-SSCD ears were excluded due to lack of high-resolution imaging.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses reveal that SSCD diagnosis is associated with higher rates of geniculate ganglion (GG) dehiscence compared with non-SSCD controls (42.7 vs. 24%; χ²(1) = 9.69,P = 0.008). Individuals with SSCD depicted significantly thinner bone overlying the geniculate ganglion (GG) (0.23 ± 1.2 mm) compared to controls (0.28 ± 1.8 mm, (t(1 6 4)) = 2.1, P = 0.04). SSCD patients presented thinner bone overlying the internal auditory canal (IAC) (0.33 ± 1.3 mm) compared to patients without SSCD (0.46 ± 1.6 mm, (t(2 5 7) = 6.4, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased prevalence of dehiscence of the MCF in this cohort of SSCD patients compared to non-SSCD patients suggests that the etiology underlying SSCD affects surrounding structures.

A tale of 1 year: a case of bilateral conductive hearing loss due to bilateral ossicular chain disruption post head trauma

The traumatic hearing loss is a common finding after head trauma that involves the temporal bone fracture or skull base injury, but the late presentation of the hearing loss bilaterally is a rare presentation. This case report describes the rare and late presentation of bilateral conductive hearing loss 1-year after the head trauma, limited to ossicular chain disruption and hearing loss. This case of post head trauma that was limited to ossicular chain distribution progressed to bilateral conductive hearing loss without temporal bone fracture. A 14-year-old male was presented conductive hearing loss of one year after head injury, CT scan revealed bilateral ossicles disruption. Afterwards, osicuoloplasty was performed which improved the hearing of the patient. In conclusion, bilateral hearing loss with no obvious skull fracture should be suspected and investigated so an early intervention could be established. The CT was considered the imaging modality of choice for ossicular chain distribution.