SPECT- and PET-based approaches for noninvasive diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection

[Imaging after kidney transplantation in childhood and adolescence]

The ultrasound (US) examination is the most important imaging procedure in the clinical care of children with chronic kidney disease, the assessment before kidney transplantation and in the acute and chronic phase after successful kidney transplantation. In trained hands, particularly with experience in Doppler sonography, US ensures that vascular complications, such as occlusions, thrombosis, stenosis as well as non-vascular complications, e.g., urinary tract dilatation, abscesses, hematomas, urine leaks or lymphoceles, are cost-effectively and rapidly diagnosed at any time. For the diagnosis of acute rejection, the US signs in the intraindividual course are only suggestive, but not specific. The gold standard for the diagnosis of acute rejection is a kidney biopsy. In these cases, US serves to exclude other causes. The use of multimodal techniques, various Doppler techniques and microvascular procedures, such as superb microvascular imaging (SMI) or B‑flow and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), optimizes the imaging in the context of transplantations in children. Magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighed imaging (DWI), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and magnetic resonance urography (MRU) as well as functional MRU (fMRU) performed with the administration of gadolinium-containing contrast agents, are part of the extended diagnostics and possibly necessary for surgical planning in the early phase after kidney transplantation and for long-term assessment after transplantation. Excretory urography is associated with ionizing radiation and intravenous administration of iodine-containing contrast medium and is obsolete in children. Computed tomography (CT) using age-adapted and weight-adapted dose protocols is an alternative in emergencies if MRI is not available.

The uptake of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose by the renal allograft correlates with the acute Banff scores of cortex inflammation but not with the 1-year graft outcomes

Introduction

[18F]FDG PET/CT noninvasively disproves acute kidney allograft rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with suspected AR. However, the correlation of biopsy-based Banff vs. PET/CT-based scores of acute inflammation remains unknown, as does the prognostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/CT at one year post suspected AR.

Methods

From 2012 to 2019, 114 [18F]FDG-PET/CTs were prospectively performed in 105 adult KTRs who underwent per cause transplant biopsies. Ordinal logistic regression assessed the correlation between the extent of histological inflammation and the mean standardized [18F]FDG uptake values (mSUVmean). Functional outcomes of kidney allografts were evaluated at one year post per cause biopsy and correlated to mSUVmean.

Results

A significant correlation between mSUVmean and acute Banff score was found, with an adjusted R 2 of 0.25. The mSUVmean was significantly different between subgroups of "total i", with 2.30 ± 0.71 in score 3 vs. 1.68 ± 0.24 in score 0. Neither the function nor the survival of the graft at one year was statistically related to mSUVmean.

Discussion

[18F]FDG-PET/CT may help noninvasively assess the severity of kidney allograft inflammation in KTRs with suspected AR, but it does not predict graft outcomes at one year.

Basic principles and new advances in kidney imaging

Over the past few years, clinical renal imaging has seen great advances, allowing assessments of kidney structure and morphology, perfusion, function and metabolism, and oxygenation, as well as microstructure and the interstitium. Medical imaging is becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of kidney physiology and pathophysiology, showing promise in management of patients with renal disease, in particular with regard to diagnosis, classification, and prediction of disease development and progression, monitoring response to therapy, detection of drug toxicity, and patient selection for clinical trials. A variety of imaging modalities, ranging from routine to advanced tools, are currently available to probe the kidney both spatially and temporally, particularly ultrasonography, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, renal scintigraphy, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Given that the range is broad and varied, kidney imaging techniques should be chosen based on the clinical question and the specific underlying pathologic mechanism, taking into account contraindications and possible adverse effects. Integration of various modalities providing complementary information will likely provide the greatest insight into renal pathophysiology. This review aims to highlight major recent advances in key tools that are currently available or potentially relevant for clinical kidney imaging, with a focus on non-oncological applications. The review also outlines the context of use, limitations, and advantages of various techniques, and highlights gaps to be filled with future development and clinical adoption.

Preclinical pharmacokinetic, biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and toxicity studies of 99mTc-HYNIC-(Ser)3-LTVPWY: A novel HER2-targeted peptide radiotracer

Accurate assessment of the HER2 expression is an essential issue for predicting response to anti-HER2 therapy in breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate ^99mTc-HYNIC-(Ser)₃-LTVPWY (^99mTc-HYNIC-LY) peptide as a novel HER2-targeted radiolabeled peptide in healthy mice to examine the applicability of this imaging agent in a first-in-human clinical trial. To this end, pharmacokinetic and dosimetry studies were performed according to the ICH guideline M3 (R2) with ^99mTc-HYNIC-LY. To estimate the radiation-absorbed doses in humans, the accumulated activity in each mouse organ was calculated based on biodistribution data. In addition, toxicology assessment was performed based on mortality events, body weights, and serum biochemical, hematological, and histopathological assays. The pharmacokinetic study showed rapid blood clearance. Based on the results of biodistribution study, the highest radioactivity was observed in the kidneys. The projected absorbed doses to the kidneys, liver, lungs, stomach, and spleen were obtained as 1.70E-02, 1.42E-02, 1.02E-02, 8.62E-03, and 8.34E-03 mSv/MBq, respectively. The results also revealed that serum biochemical and hematological parameters were in the normal range. No significant morphologic alterations were observed in the liver, kidneys, and spleen tissues. Consequently, the results were indicative of the suitability of ^99mTc-HYNIC-LY peptide for advancement to a first-in-human clinical trial.

Update on imaging-based diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Despite effective immunosuppressants, acute allograft rejections pose a major threat to graft survival. In early stages, acute rejections are still potentially reversible, and early detection is crucial to initiate the necessary treatment options and to prevent further graft dysfunction or even loss of the complete graft. Currently, invasive core needle biopsy is the reference standard to diagnose acute rejection. However, biopsies carry the risk of graft injuries and cannot be immediately performed on patients receiving anticoagulation drugs. Therefore, non-invasive assessment of the whole organ for specific and rapid detection of acute allograft rejection is desirable. We herein provide a review summarizing current imaging-based approaches for non-invasive diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection.

The clinical utility of FDG PET/CT among solid organ transplant recipients suspected of malignancy or infection

PURPOSE

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at high risk of developing infections and malignancies. 18F-FDG PET/CT may enable timely detection of these diseases and help to ensure early intervention. We aimed to describe the clinical utility of FDG PET/CT in consecutive, diagnostic unresolved SOT recipients transplanted from January 2004 to May 2015.

METHODS

Recipients with a post-transplant FDG PET/CT performed as part of diagnostic work-up were included. Detailed chart reviews were done to extract relevant clinical information and determine the final diagnosis related to the FDG PET/CT. Based on á priori defined criteria and the final diagnosis, results from each scan were classified as true or false, and diagnostic values determined.

RESULTS

Among the 1,814 recipients in the cohort, 145 had an FDG PET/CT performed; 122 under the indication of diagnostically unresolved symptoms with a suspicion of malignancy or infection. The remaining (N = 23) had an FDG PET/CT to follow-up on a known disease or to stage a known malignancy. The 122 recipients underwent a total of 133 FDG PET/CT scans performed for a suspected malignancy (66 %) or an infection (34 %). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the FDG PET/CT in diagnosing these conditions were 97, 84, 87, and 96 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET/CT is an accurate diagnostic tool for the work-up of diagnostic unresolved SOT recipients suspected of malignancy or infection. The high sensitivity and NPV underlines the potential usefulness of PET/CT for excluding malignancy or focal infections in this often complex clinical situation.

The Uptake of 18F-FDG by Renal Allograft in Kidney Transplant Recipients Is Not Influenced by Renal Function

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT

F-FDG PET/CT has been recently proposed as a noninvasive tool for the diagnosis of renal allograft acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Still, the influence of kidney function on F-FDG uptake by renal grafts remains unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified all KTRs who underwent at least one F-FDG PET/CT. Kidney transplant recipients with documented pyelonephritis or AR were excluded. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was assessed using chronic kidney disease (CKD)-EPI equation. Mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) of renal graft cortex and aorta were measured in 4 and 1 volumes of interest, respectively. Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed.

RESULTS

Eighty-two KTRs underwent F-FDG PET/CT for tumor staging (n = 46), suspected infection (n = 11), or fever of unknown origin (n = 25). Mean eGFR was 50 ± 19 mL/min per 1.73 m, including CKD stage 1 (n = 3), stage 2 (n = 21), stage 3a (n = 20), stage 3b (n = 29), and stage 4 (n = 9). Mean kidney and aorta SUVmean were 1.8 ± 0.2 and 1.7 ± 0.3, respectively. No significant correlation was observed between eGFR and kidney SUVmean (ρ, 0.119; P, 0.28) or aorta SUVmean (ρ, -0.144; P, 0.20). ANOVA showed no difference of kidney (P, 0.62) and aorta (P, 0.85) SUVmean between CKD groups. Mean coefficient of variation (on the basis of kidney SUVmean of >3 consecutive F-FDG PET/CT in 15 patients with no significant change of eGFR) reached 13.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The uptake of F-FDG by renal allografts within an hour postinjection is not significantly impacted by CKD.

Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, part II: omics analyses of urine and blood samples

Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, the full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene-expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leucocytes may be detectable by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, CXCL10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has yet been adopted in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of analysis procedures may help assess reproducibility and comparative diagnostic yield in large, prospective, multicentre trials.

Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Part I. In vivo imaging methods

Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, like contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leukocytes may be detectable by ¹⁸F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, IP-10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has been adopted yet in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of procedures may help assess reproducibility and compare diagnostic yields in large prospective multicentric trials.

Fluorodeoxyglucose F(18) Positron Emission Tomography Coupled With Computed Tomography in Suspected Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

Management of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with suspected acute rejection (AR) ultimately relies on kidney biopsy; however, noninvasive tests predicting nonrejection would help avoid unnecessary biopsy. AR involves recruitment of leukocytes avid for fluorodeoxyglucose F(18) ((18) F-FDG), thus (18) F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) coupled with computed tomography (CT) may noninvasively distinguish nonrejection from AR. From January 2013 to February 2015, we prospectively performed 32 (18) F-FDG PET/CT scans in 31 adult KTRs with suspected AR who underwent transplant biopsy. Biopsies were categorized into four groups: normal (n = 8), borderline (n = 10), AR (n = 8), or other (n = 6, including 3 with polyoma BK nephropathy). Estimated GFR was comparable in all groups. PET/CT was performed 201 ± 18 minutes after administration of 3.2 ± 0.2 MBq/kg of (18) F-FDG, before any immunosuppression change. Mean standard uptake values (SUVs) of both upper and lower renal poles were measured. Mean SUVs reached 1.5 ± 0.2, 1.6 ± 0.3, 2.9 ± 0.8, and 2.2 ± 1.2 for the normal, borderline, AR, and other groups, respectively. One-way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference of mean SUVs among groups. A positive correlation between mean SUV and acute composite Banff score was found, with r(2)  = 0.49. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93, with 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity using a mean SUV threshold of 1.6. In conclusion, (18) F-FDG PET/CT may help noninvasively prevent avoidable transplant biopsies in KTRs with suspected AR.