Mediastinal staging for lung cancer

Presurgical invasive mediastinal staging in lung cancer, unexpected N2 and long-term survival: a registry-based study with data from the Spanish group for video-assisted thoracic surgery

Background

Mediastinal lymph node staging is a key element in the diagnosis of lung cancer. The combination of computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) has improved staging but some circumstances are known to influence their negative predictive value. The objective of this study was to assess the impact on survival of avoiding invasive mediastinal staging in surgical lung cancer patients with negative mediastinum in CT and PET and intermediate risk of unexpected pN2.

Methods

Data were collected from the prospective cohort of the Spanish Group for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (GEVATS), from December 2016 to March 2018. For this study, patients were selected if they had negative mediastinum in CT and PET findings but tumours >3 cm or located centrally, or with cN1 disease. Patients who did and did not undergo invasive staging [invasive group (IG) and non-invasive group (NIG)] were compared, analysing unexpected pN2 and survival with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression.

Results

A total of 2,826 patients underwent surgery for primary lung cancer. We selected 1,247 patients who had tumours >3 cm, central tumours or cN1. Invasive staging was performed in 275 (22.1%) cases. The unexpected pN2 rate was 9.6% in the NIG and 13.8% in the IG, but half of them were discovered prior to surgery in the IG. Five-year overall survival (OS) was poorer in the IG (52.4% vs. 64%; P<0.001). In the Cox regression model, male sex, older age, diabetes, synchronous tumour, lower diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, larger tumour size, higher pathological N-stage, and IG status were significant independent risk factors.

Conclusions

Invasive staging recommended by guidelines could be reduced with an appropriate selection in mediastinal CT- and PET-negative patients with risk factors for unexpected pN2, because rates of pN2 and survival did not worsen without invasive staging.

Results in mediastinal lymph node staging of surgical lung cancer: Data from the prospective cohort of the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Group

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of combined computerised tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) in mediastinal staging of surgical lung cancer based on data obtained from the prospective cohort of the Spanish Group for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (GEVATS).

METHODS

A total of 2782 patients underwent surgery for primary lung carcinoma. We analysed diagnostic success in mediastinal lymph node staging (cN2) using CT and PET. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed of the factors involved in this success. The risk of unexpected pN2 disease was analysed for cases in which an invasive testing is recommended: cN1, the tumour centrally located or the tumour diameter >3 cm.

RESULTS

The overall success of CT together with PET was 82.9% with a positive predictive value of 0.21 and negative predictive value of 0.93. If the tumour was larger than 3 cm and for each unit increase in mediastinal SUVmax, the probability of success was lower with OR 0.59 (0.44-0.79) and 0.71 (0.66-0.75), respectively. In the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach, the probability of success was higher with OR 2.04 (1.52-2.73). The risk of unexpected pN2 increased with the risk factors cN1, the tumour centrally located or the tumour diameter >3 cm: from 4.5% (0 factors) to 18.8% (3 factors) but did not differ significantly as a function of whether invasive testing was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

CT and PET together have a high negative predictive value. The overall success of the staging is lower in the case of tumours >3 cm and high mediastinal SUVmax, and it is higher when VATS is performed. The risk of unexpected pN2 is higher if the disease is cN1, the tumour centrally located or the tumour diameter >3 cm but does not vary significantly as a function of whether patients have undergone invasive testing.

Postoperative radiotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer: The never-ending story

This manuscript collects in a joint and orderly manner the existing evidence at the present time about postoperative treatment with radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. It also systematically reviews the current evidence, the international recommendations in the most relevant guidelines, the most controversial aspects in clinical and pathological staging, the specific technical aspects of radiotherapy treatment, and also collects all the potential risk factors that have been postulated as significant in the prognosis of these patients, evaluating the possibility of segmenting a particularly sensitive subpopulation with a high risk of relapse on which an adjuvant treatment with radiotherapy could have an impact on their clinical evolution. Finally, currently active trials that aspire to provide more evidence on this topic are reviewed.

Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a very heterogeneous disease that encompasses patients with resected, potentially resectable and unresectable tumours. To improve the prognostic capacity of the TNM classification, it has been agreed to divide stage III into sub-stages IIIA, IIIB and IIIC that have very different 5-year survival rates (36, 26 and 13%, respectively). Currently, it is considered that both staging and optimal treatment of stage III NSCLC requires the joint work of a multidisciplinary team of expert physicians within the tumour committee. To improve the care of patients with stage III NSCLC, different scientific societies involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease have agreed to issue a series of recommendations that can contribute to homogenise the management of this disease, and ultimately to improve patient care.

Cytologic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-Positive Lymph Nodes Sampled by Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: Experience at a Large Cancer Center

CONTEXT.—

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is routinely used to evaluate mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs), especially for cancer staging. There are limited large studies evaluating the cytologic, radiologic, and clinical features of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography-positive (PET-CT+) LNs.

OBJECTIVE.—

To compare cytologic, radiologic, and clinical features of PET-CT+, cytology-malignant (PET-CT+/Cyto+) and PET-CT+, cytology-benign (PET-CT+/Cyto-) LNs.

DESIGN.—

The pathology database was searched for cases of mediastinal LNs obtained by EBUS-TBNA from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. The cytologic, radiologic, and clinical features were collected for all PET-CT+ LNs.

RESULTS.—

Of 2267 mediastinal LNs obtained by EBUS-TBNA during this period, 577 LNs met the criteria. Of the latter, 263 (46%) were PET-CT+/Cyto+ and 314 (54%) were PET-CT+/Cyto-. All of the patients with PET-CT+/Cyto+ results had a prior or concurrent diagnosis of malignancy as compared to 89% of patients with PET-CT+/Cyto- results. Of the 224 patients with PET-CT+/Cyto+ LNs, 177 (79%) had metastases from lung primary, 43 (19%) had metastases from nonlung primaries, and 7 (3%) had lymphoma. Average LN size was larger in the PET-CT+/Cyto+ group than in the PET-CT+/Cyto- group (14.6 mm versus 9.58 mm), and mean standardized uptake value in PET-CT+/Cyto+ LNs was higher than that of PET-CT+/Cyto- LNs (10.05 versus 5.99). Significant cytologic findings in PET-CT+/Cyto- cases were necrosis and granulomatous inflammation, including 3 cases with fungal organisms.

CONCLUSIONS.—

PET-CT positivity alone was nonspecific for malignancy and insufficient to guide management of patients with mediastinal adenopathy, but specificity could be improved when combined with LN size and standardized uptake value.

Lung cancer staging: a concise update

Diagnosis and clinical staging of lung cancer are fundamental to planning therapy. The techniques for clinical staging, i.e anatomic and metabolic imaging, endoscopies and minimally invasive surgical procedures, should be performed sequentially and with an increasing degree of invasiveness. Intraoperative staging, assessing the magnitude of the primary tumour, the involved structures, and the loco-regional lymphatic spread by means of systematic nodal dissection, is essential in order to achieve a complete resection. In resected tumours, pathological staging, with the systematic study of the resected specimens, is the strongest prognostic indicator and is essential to make further decisions on therapy. In the present decade, the guidelines on lung cancer staging of the American College of Chest Physicians and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons are based on the best available evidence and are widely followed. Recent advances in the classification of the adenocarcinoma of the lung, with the definition of adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma, and the publication of the eighth edition of the tumour, node and metastasis classification of lung cancer, have to be integrated into the staging process. The present review complements the latest guidelines on lung cancer staging by providing an update of all these issues.

Diagnostic Imaging and Newer Modalities for Thoracic Diseases: PET/Computed Tomographic Imaging and Endobronchial Ultrasound for Staging and Its Implication for Lung Cancer

Modalities to detect and characterize lung cancer are generally divided into those that are invasive [endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), esophageal ultrasound (EUS), and electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENMB)] versus noninvasive [chest radiography (CXR), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)]. This chapter describes these modalities, the literature supporting their use, and delineates what tests to use to best evaluate the patient with lung cancer.

Diagnostic Imaging and Newer Modalities for Thoracic Diseases: PET/Computed Tomographic Imaging and Endobronchial Ultrasound for Staging and Its Implication for Lung Cancer

Modalities to detect and characterize lung cancer are generally divided into those that are invasive [endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), esophageal ultrasound (EUS), and electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENMB)] versus noninvasive [chest radiography (CXR), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)]. This chapter describes these modalities, the literature supporting their use, and delineates what tests to use to best evaluate the patient with lung cancer.