Rescue Therapy with a Proton Pump Inhibitor Plus Amoxicillin and Rifabutin for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of rifasutenizol, a novel dual-targeted antibacterial agent in healthy participants and patients in China with Helicobacter pylori infection: four randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Due to the rapid development of antimicrobial resistance, the efficacy of most Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies have progressively decreased to an unacceptable level. Rifasutenizol (TNP-2198) is a new molecular entity with a synergistic dual mechanism of action currently under clinical development for the treatment of microaerophilic and anaerobic bacterial infections. We aimed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of rifasutenizol in healthy Chinese participants and patients with H pylori.

METHODS

We conducted four clinical trials of rifasutenizol capsules in healthy participants (aged 18-55 years) and patients with asymptomatic H pylori infection (aged 18-65 years) in a clinical trial centre in Jilin province, China. Trial 1 was a phase 1, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study, in which participants were enrolled into one of seven rifasutenizol dose groups (50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, 800 mg, or 1000 mg) and were randomly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to study drug or placebo. Trial 2 was a phase 1, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose study, in which patients were enrolled into one of three rifasutenizol dose groups (200 mg, 400 mg, or 600 mg) and were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to study drug or placebo. Trial 3 was a phase 2a, open-label, randomised, multiple-dose, dose-finding study in which patients enrolled into one of four cohorts were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to a rifasutenizol dual or triple regimen. Trial 4 was a phase 2b, open-label, randomised, multiple-dose, regimen exploration study, in which patients enrolled into one of five cohorts were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1:1:2 ratio to a rifasutenizol dual therapy, triple therapy, or a control cohort. Block randomisation (block size 4 or 8) was used in all four trials. The key primary endpoints for trials 1, 2, and 3 were the tolerability, safety, and pharmacokinetics of rifasutenizol. For trial 4, the primary endpoint was the eradication rate of H pylori. These four trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06081699, NCT06081712, NCT06076681, and NCT06076694) and chinadrugtrials.org.cn (CTR20190734, CTR20192553, CTR20212050, and CTR20220625) and are completed.

FINDINGS

Between May 9, 2019, and Sept 14, 2022, 78 healthy participants (trial 1: n=10 per cohort in a 4:1 rifasutenizol:placebo ratio; and an additional eight for the food-effect cohort) and 168 patients with asymptomatic H pylori infection (trial 2: n=16 per cohort in a 3:1 rifasutenizol:placebo ratio; trial 3: n=10 per cohort; trial 4: n=10 or n=20 per cohort) were enrolled in the four clinical trials. Single doses of rifasutenizol (50-1000 mg) and multiple doses of rifasutenizol (200 mg to 600 mg, twice a day), either as monotherapy or co-administered with rabeprazole and amoxicillin, showed favourable safety and tolerability profiles. Most adverse events were mild, and no serious adverse events were reported. Rifasutenizol demonstrated a linear pharmacokinetic profile over the dose range of 50-800 mg, and there were no apparent pharmacokinetic interactions between rifasutenizol and the co-administrated drugs. Food intake slightly elevated the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of rifasutenizol, and the geometric mean of AUC from time 0 to the last timepoint with a quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) and AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) in the fed state were 1·334 and 1·396 times of those in the fasted state, respectively. There was mild accumulation after continuous administration of rifasutenizol, and the Rac(AUC) of rifasutenizol 400 mg in the dual and triple regiments in trial 3 were 1·37 and 1·49, respectively. In trial 3, the eradication rates of H pylori with 200 mg, 400 mg, or 600 mg of rifasutenizol in combination with rabeprazole, twice a day for 14 days, were 0% (95% CI 0-31), 30% (7-65), and 40% (12-74), respectively, identifying rifasutenizol 400 mg as the effective dose. In trial 4, H pylori eradication rates with the triple regimen in cohort A (400 mg rifasutenizol, 20 mg rabeprazole sodium, and 1 g amoxicillin) twice a day for 14 days was 95% (95% CI 74-100), and triple therapy (600 mg rifasutenizol, 20 mg rabeprazole sodium, and 1 g amoxicillin) three times a day for 7 days was 100% (69-100).

INTERPRETATION

Rifasutenizol monotherapy and combination therapy was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy participants and patients with H pylori infection. A triple regimen of 400 mg rifasutenizol capsules, 20 mg rabeprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets, and 1 g amoxicillin capsules twice a day for 14 days showed promising efficacy as a new treatment regimen for H pylori infection.

FUNDING

TenNor Therapeutics and National Natural Science Foundation of China.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Rifabutin as salvage therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: Cornerstones and novelties

When several Helicobacter pylori eradication treatments fail, guidelines recommend a cultured guided approach; however, culture is not widely available. Therefore, a rifabutin based regimen could be the best solution. Rifabutin indeed shows a low rate of antibiotic resistance. Rifabutin is generally used in combination with amoxicillin in a triple therapy, with eradication rates about 80% in third-line regimens. The ideal duration of this therapy should range between 10 and 12 d. Combinations with antibiotics other than amoxicillin have demonstrated even better results, such as vonoprazan, which is a type of novel acid suppressor drug. Finally, a new formulation of triple therapy in a single capsule is under investigation, which is a field that deserves further investigation. Some notes of caution about rifabutin should be mentioned. This drug is used to treat tuberculosis or atypical mycobacteria; therefore, before starting a rifabutin-based eradication regimen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection should be thoroughly tested, since its use could promote the development of antibiotic resistance, thus affecting its effectiveness against Koch’s bacillus. Additionally, some serious side effects must be evaluated before starting any rifabutin-based therapy. Adverse effects include fever, nausea, vomiting and bone marrow suppression. For this reason, full blood count surveillance is required.

Experience with Rifabutin-Containing Therapy in 500 Patients from the European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management (Hp-EuReg)

BACKGROUND

First-line Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatments have been relatively well evaluated; however, it remains necessary to identify the most effective rescue treatments. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of H. pylori regimens containing rifabutin.

METHODS

International multicentre prospective non-interventional European Registry on H. pylori Management (Hp-EuReg). Patients treated with rifabutin were registered in AEG-REDCap e-CRF from 2013 to 2021. Modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Data were subject to quality control.

RESULTS

Overall, 500 patients included in the Hp-EuReg were treated with rifabutin (mean age 52 years, 72% female, 63% with dyspepsia, 4% with peptic ulcer). Culture was performed in 63% of cases: dual resistance (to both clarithromycin and metronidazole) was reported in 46% of the cases, and triple resistance (to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin) in 39%. In 87% of cases rifabutin was utilised as part of a triple therapy together with amoxicillin and a proton-pump-inhibitor, and in an additional 6% of the patients, bismuth was added to this triple regimen. Rifabutin was mainly used in second-line (32%), third-line (25%), and fourth-line (27%) regimens, achieving overall 78%, 80% and 66% effectiveness by modified intention-to-treat, respectively. Compliance with treatment was 89%. At least one adverse event was registered in 26% of the patients (most frequently nausea), and one serious adverse event (0.2%) was reported in one patient with leukopenia and thrombocytopenia with fever requiring hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

Rifabutin-containing therapy represents an effective and safe strategy after one or even several failures of H. pylori eradication treatment.

Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: The Bhubaneswar Consensus Report of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology

The Indian Society of Gastroenterology (ISG) felt the need to organize a consensus on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and to update the current management of H. pylori infection; hence, ISG constituted the ISG's Task Force on Helicobacter pylori. The Task Force on H. pylori undertook an exercise to produce consensus statements on H. pylori infection. Twenty-five experts from different parts of India, including gastroenterologists, pathologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, pediatricians, and microbiologists participated in the meeting. The participants were allocated to one of following sections for the meeting: Epidemiology of H. pylori infection in India and H. pylori associated conditions; diagnosis; treatment and retreatment; H. pylori and gastric cancer, and H. pylori prevention/public health. Each group reviewed all published literature on H. pylori infection with special reference to the Indian scenario and prepared appropriate statements on different aspects for voting and consensus development. This consensus, which was produced through a modified Delphi process including two rounds of face-to-face meetings, reflects our current understanding and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of H. pylori infection. These consensus should serve as a reference for not only guiding treatment of H. pylori infection but also to guide future research on the subject.

The influence of P-glycoprotein expression in the standard treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Sprague Dawley rats

BACKGROUND

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) dependent drug-efflux pump which is located abundantly in the stomach and protects the gut mucosa from xenobiotic.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of P-gp modulation on the efficacy of treatment regimen.

METHOD

P-gp modulation in rats was performed by using P-gp inducer (150 mg/kg rifampicin) and P-gp inhibitor (10 mg/kg cyclosporine A) for 14 days prior to be infected with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). The rats were further divided into groups, which were normal control, vehicle control, antibiotics and omeprazole, antibiotics only and omeprazole only for another 2 weeks of treatment. The ulcer formation and P-gp expression were determined by using macroscopic evaluation and western blot analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

The highest P-gp expression was shown in the induced P-gp rats (2.00 ± 0.68) while the lowest P-gp expression was shown in the inhibited P-gp rats (0.45 ± 0.36) compared to the normal P-gp rats. In all groups, the rats which were infected with H. pylori, had a significant increase (p < 0.05) in P-gp expression level and a more severe ulcer formation compared to the healthy rats. The ulcer developed at different levels in the rats with inhibited, induced, or normal P-gp expression. After receiving the standard therapy for H. pylori, it was observed that the healing rate for ulcer was increased to 91% (rats with inhibited P-gp expression), 82% (rats with induced P-gp expression) and 75% in rats with normal P-gp. The use of rifampicin to induce P-gp level was also shown to be effective in eradicating the H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSION

The synergism in the standard therapy by using two antibiotics (clarithromycin and amoxicillin) and proton pump inhibitor (omeprazole) have shown to effectively eradicate the H. pylori infection. Thus, P-gp expression influenced the effectiveness of the treatment.

Rifabutin triple therapy for first-line and rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Due to the increasing resistance of Helicobacter pylori, there is a need for novel antibiotic treatment protocols. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to determine the effectiveness and safety of rifabutin triple therapy for H. pylori infection.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of prospective clinical trials with a treatment arm consisting of proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and rifabutin and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Thirty-three prospective studies including 44 datasets were identified. Meta-analysis of four RCTs for rescue treatment found no difference between treatment groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.437-1.791, I²  = 68.1%, P = 0.733). Only one RCT compared rifabutin therapy with control for first-line treatment of H. pylori infection (OR 3.78, 95% CI 2.44-5.87, P < 0.0001). Treatment was more likely to be successful in Asian versus non-Asian populations (81.0% vs 72.4%, P = 0.001) and when daily amoxicillin dose was ≥ 3000 mg or proton pump inhibitor dose was ≥ 80 mg or treatment duration was 14 days (80.6% vs 66.0%, P = 0.0001). The overall event rate for adverse effects was 24.8% (729/2937) (95% CI 0.23-0.26), and the pooled OR for adverse effects in the treatment versus control group was 0.93 (95% CI 0.50-1.75) (I²  = 79.76, P = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

Evidence for the effectiveness of rifabutin for the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection in adults is limited, and studies comparing rifabutin with conventional first-line treatments are lacking.

Rifabutin for the Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Infection: A Review

Nowadays, apart from having to know first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens well, we must also be prepared to face treatment failures. The aim of this review is to summarize the role of rifabutin in the management of H. pylori infection. Bibliographical searches were performed in PubMed. Data on resistance and efficacy of rifabutin-containing regimens on H. pylori eradication were meta-analyzed. Mean H. pylori rifabutin resistance rate (39 studies, including 9721 patients) was 0.13%; when studies only including patients naïve to H. pylori eradication treatment were considered, this figure was even lower (0.07%). Mean H. pylori eradication rate (by intention-to-treat) with rifabutin-containing regimens (3052 patients) was 73%. Respective cure rates for second-, third-, fourth- and fifth-line therapies, were 79%, 69%, 69% and 72%. Most studies administered rifabutin 300 mg/day, which seemed to be more effective than 150 mg/day. The ideal length of treatment remains unclear, but 10–12-day regimens are generally recommended. Adverse events to rifabutin treatment in H. pylori studies were relatively infrequent (15%), and severe adverse events were exceptional (myelotoxicity was the most significant, although always reversible). In summary, rifabutin-containing therapy represents an encouraging strategy generally restricted, at present, to patients where previous (usually multiple) eradication regimens have failed.

Efficacy and safety of a new rifabutin-based triple therapy with vonoprazan for refractory Helicobacter pylori infection: A prospective single-arm study

BACKGROUND

A small proportion of Helicobacter pylori-infected individuals in Japan suffer failure of eradication therapy with third-line regimens containing the potent acid suppressor, vonoprazan, and a quinolone.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rifabutin-based triple therapy with vonoprazan for refractory H pylori infection.

METHODS

Patients who failed H pylori eradication by clarithromycin-based first-line, metronidazole-based second-line, and sitafloxacin-based third-line therapies were recruited. After obtaining informed consent, patients received eradication therapy with vonoprazan (20 mg), amoxicillin (750 mg), and rifabutin (150 mg) twice daily for 10 days. Eradication was confirmed by a negative H pylori stool antigen or urea breath test at least 8 weeks after the end of therapy.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in the study. All of the patients completed the course of medication. Eradication of H pylori was confirmed in all of the patients (19/19; 100%, 95% confidence interval; 83-100%). The most common adverse event was soft stool/diarrhea (4/19, 21%). No severe adverse event was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten-day rifabutin with amoxicillin and vonoprazan triple therapy appears to be effective and safe for refractory H pylori infections. However, considering the recent publications showing high eradication rates with vonoprazan amoxicillin dual therapy, confirmation will require future studies comparing our new therapy with vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual with similar doses and duration and with vonoprazan-rifabutin dual therapy.

Hellenic consensus on Helicobacter pylori infection

The Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology recently organized the “Hellenic consensus on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection”. The aim of this publication is to report the guidelines in order to aid the national gastroenterology community in the management of H. pylori infection. Forty-one delegates from all Greek regions, including gastroenterologists, pathologists, clinical microbiologists, epidemiologists and basic scientists, were invited to this meeting. The participants were allocated to 1 of the 4 main topics of the meeting: i.e., H. pylori diagnosis and association with diseases; H. pylori and gastric cancer; H. pylori and extragastric associated disorders; and H. pylori treatment. The results of each subgroup were submitted to a final consensus vote that included all participants. Relevant data based on international and Greek publications were presented, and the quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, and level of consensus were graded. The cutoff level of 70% was considered as acceptance for the final statement. It is hoped that the recommendations and conclusions of this report will guide Greek doctors in their daily practice concerning the management of H. pylori infection.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a common worldwide infection that is an important cause of peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. H. pylori may also have a role in uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia, ulcer risk in patients taking low-dose aspirin or starting therapy with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, unexplained iron deficiency anemia, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. While choosing a treatment regimen for H. pylori, patients should be asked about previous antibiotic exposure and this information should be incorporated into the decision-making process. For first-line treatment, clarithromycin triple therapy should be confined to patients with no previous history of macrolide exposure who reside in areas where clarithromycin resistance amongst H. pylori isolates is known to be low. Most patients will be better served by first-line treatment with bismuth quadruple therapy or concomitant therapy consisting of a PPI, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and metronidazole. When first-line therapy fails, a salvage regimen should avoid antibiotics that were previously used. If a patient received a first-line treatment containing clarithromycin, bismuth quadruple therapy or levofloxacin salvage regimens are the preferred treatment options. If a patient received first-line bismuth quadruple therapy, clarithromycin or levofloxacin-containing salvage regimens are the preferred treatment options. Details regarding the drugs, doses and durations of the recommended and suggested first-line and salvage regimens can be found in the guideline.