1
|
Neto JS, Costa CM, de Assis AM, Pugliese R, Benavides MR, Carnevale FC, Cavalcante ACBS, Kondo M, Fonseca EA. Treatment Strategies for Bile Leak Following Pediatric Liver Transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14814. [PMID: 38895799 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
There are no standard management protocols for the treatment of bile leak (BL) after liver transplantation. The objective of this study is to describe treatment options for BL after pediatric LT. METHODS Retrospective analysis (January 2010-March 2023). VARIABLES STUDIED preoperative data, status at diagnosis, and postoperative outcome. Four groups: observation (n = 9), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC, n = 38), ERCP (2), and surgery (n = 27). RESULTS Nine hundred and thirty-one pediatric liver transplantation (859 LDLT and 72 DDT); 78 (8.3%) patients had BL, all in LDLT. The median (IQR) peritoneal bilirubin (PB) level and fluid-to-serum bilirubin ratio (FSBR) at diagnosis was 14.40 mg/dL (8.5-29), and 10.7 (4.1-23.7). Patients who required surgery for treatment underwent the procedure earlier, at a median of 14 days (IQR: 7-19) versus 22 days for PTC (IQR: 15-27, p = 0.002). PB and FSBR were significantly lower in the observation group. In 11 cases, conservative management had resolution of the BL in an average time of 35 days, and 38 patients underwent PTC in a median time of 22 days (15-27). Twenty-seven (34.6%) patients were reoperated as initial treatment for BL in a median time of 17 days (1-108 days); 25 (33%) patients evolved with biliary stricture, 5 (18.5%) after surgery, and 20 (52.6%) after PTC (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Patients with BL who were observed presented significantly lower levels of PB and FSBR versus those who underwent PTC or surgery. Patients treated with PTC presented higher rates of biliary stricture during the follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Seda Neto
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carolina M Costa
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - André M de Assis
- Interventional Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renata Pugliese
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcel R Benavides
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Mario Kondo
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eduardo A Fonseca
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reddy MS, Kasahara M, Ikegami T, Lee KW. An international survey of venous thromboembolic events and current practices of peri-operative VTE prophylaxis after living donor hepatectomy. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15209. [PMID: 38064308 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolic complications are an uncommon but significant cause of morbidity & mortality after live donor hepatectomy . The precise incidence of these events and the current practices of centers performing living donor liver transplantation worldwide are unknown. METHODS An online survey was shared amongst living donor liver transplantation centers containing questions regarding center activity, center protocols for donor screening, peri-operative thromboembolic prophylaxis and an audit of -perioperative venous thromboembolic events after live donor hepatectomy in the previous five years (2016-2020). RESULTS Fifty-one centers from twenty countries completed the survey. These centers had cumulatively performed 11500 living donor liver transplants between 2016-2020. All centers included pre-operative l assessment for thromboembolic risk amongst potential liver donors in their protocols. Testing for inherited prothrombotic conditions was performed by 58% of centers. Dual-mode prophylaxis was the most common practice (65%), while eight and four centers used single mode or no routine prophylaxis respectively. Twenty (39%) and 15 (29%) centers reported atleast one perioperative deep venous thrmobosis or pulmonary embolism event respectively. There was one donor mortality directly related to post-operative pulmonary embolism. Overall incidence of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism events was 3.65 and 1.74 per 1000 live donor hepatectomies respectively. Significant variations in center practices and incidence of thromboembolic events was identified in the survey primarily divided along world regions. 75% of participating centers agreed on the need for clear international guidelines. CONCLUSION Venous thromboembolic events after live donor hepatectomy are an uncommon but important cause of donor morbidity. There is significant variation in practice among centers. Evidence-based guidelines regarding risk assessment, and peri-operative prophylaxis are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mettu Srinivas Reddy
- Department of Liver Transplantation & Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gleneagles Global Hospital, Chennai, India
| | - Mureo Kasahara
- Center for Organ Transplantation, National Center for Child Health & Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Ikegami
- Department of Surgery & Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seda Neto J, Magalhães Costa C, Pereira FP, Pugliese R, Travassos NP, Oliveira CM, Vincenzi R, Benavides MR, Roda K, Kondo M, Fonseca EA. Anterior hepatic resection: A simple and safe technique for reducing the antero-posterior diameter of the liver graft for small pediatric recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14518. [PMID: 36973639 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The techniques involved in neonatal and infantile transplantation require approaches that can sculpt a left lateral segment (LLS) to the right shape and size and avoid large-for-size syndrome. The aim of this article is to describe the anterior hepatic resection (AHR) of the LLS in pediatric LDLT. METHODS A retrospective anatomical study of preoperative image studies, description of the technique for AHR, and short-term results. RESULTS The AHR was performed in eight cases. All donors were male, with average age, BW, and BMI of 28.3 ± 5.9 years, 74.2 ± 9.3 kg, and 24.3 ± 2.6 kg/m2, respectively. Donors were discharged at an average of 3.6 ± 0.8 days. The median recipient age and BW at transplantation were 6.9 (2.7 to 11) months and 5.9 (3.9 to 8) kg, respectively, and the recipient-to-donor body weight ratio (RDBW) was <0.1 in all but one case. The mean percentage reduction in graft weight and in the antero-posterior diameter were 33.2% ± 5.5% and 38.3% ± 12.6%, respectively. The average (SD) GRWR was 4.8% ± 1.7% before all the resections and 3.5% ± 1.0% after the procedures. Seven patients were primarily closed. CONCLUSION After LLS resection, a nonanatomical anterior resection of the LLS was accomplished without hilar vascular dissection to segments II/III. The final liver graft allowed primary abdominal wall closure in all but one patient, with meaningful adjustments in GRWR. AHR proved to be simple, safe, reproducible, and effective in the presented case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Seda Neto
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Renata Pugliese
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Caio M Oliveira
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Vincenzi
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcel R Benavides
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Karina Roda
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mário Kondo
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eduardo A Fonseca
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
da Fonseca EA, Feier FH, Costa CM, Benavides MAR, Vincenzi R, de Oliveira Roda Vincenzi KM, Pugliese RPS, Porta G, Miura IK, de Oliveira CMV, Chapchap P, Neto JS. Hepatic venous reconstruction of the left lateral segment with emphasis on anomalous hepatic vein in pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:827-835. [PMID: 36847137 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Left lateral segment grafts have become a suitable option in pediatric liver transplantation (PLT). The correlation between hepatic vein (HV) reconstruction and outcome is relevant when assessing the safe use of these grafts. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records prospectively collected from a pediatric living donor liver transplantation database and conducted a comparative analysis of the different left lateral segment graft types according to HV reconstruction. Donor, recipient, and intraoperative variables were analyzed. Post-transplant outcomes included vascular complications such as hepatic vein outflow obstruction, early (≤30 d) and late (>30 d) PVT, hepatic artery thrombosis, and graft survival. From February 2017 to August 2021, 303 PLTs were performed. According to venous anatomy, the distribution of the left lateral segment was as follows: single HV (type I) in 174 (57.4%), close HVs, simple venoplasty for reconstruction (type II) in 97 (32.01%), anomalous hepatic vein (AHV) with a distance between the HVs orifices that allowed simple venoplasty (type IIIA) in 25 (8.26%) and AHV with a distance between the HVs orifices requiring homologous venous graft interposition (type IIIB) in 07 (2.31%) grafts. Type IIIB grafts came from male donors ( p =0.04) and had a higher mean donor height ( p =0.008), a higher mean graft weight, and a higher graft-to-recipient weight ratio, both p =0.002. The median follow-up time was 41.4 months. The overall cumulative graft survival was 96.3%, and comparative graft survival showed no difference (log-rank p =0.61). No hepatic vein outflow obstructions were observed in this cohort study. There was no statistically significant difference in the post-transplant outcomes between the graft types. The venous reconstruction of the AHV with homologous venous graft interposition had similar outcomes in the short and long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Antunes da Fonseca
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Flavia Heinz Feier
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Carolina Magalhães Costa
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Marcel Albeiro Ruiz Benavides
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Vincenzi
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Karina Moreira de Oliveira Roda Vincenzi
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Renata Pereira Sustovich Pugliese
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Gilda Porta
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Irene Kazuo Miura
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Caio Marcio Vieira de Oliveira
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Paulo Chapchap
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - João Seda Neto
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neto JS, Chapchap P, Feier FH, Pugliese R, Vincenzi R, Benavides MR, Roda K, Kondo M, Fonseca EA. The impact of low recipient weight [≤ 7kg] on long-term outcomes in 1078 pediatric living donor liver transplantations. J Pediatr Surg 2022; 57:955-961. [PMID: 35697543 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND infants who require liver transplantation represent a treatment challenge because chronic liver disease at this early age affects the child's growth and development during a critical phase. The aim is to compare demographics, operative data, and long-term outcomes according to recipient weight at the time of LDLT. METHODS This retrospective study included primary LDLT analyzed in 2 groups: BW ≤ 7 kg (n = 322) and BW > 7 kg (n = 756). A historical comparison between periods was also investigated. RESULTS BW ≤ 7 kg had significantly lower height/age and weight/age z-scores, with median PELD score of 19. Transfusion rates were higher in the BW ≤ 7 kg group (30.9 ml/kg versus 15.5 ml/kg, P < 0.001). Higher frequencies of PV complications were seen in the BW ≤ 7 kg cohort. HAT and retransplantation rates were similar. Those with BW ≤ 7 kg required longer ICU and hospital stays. Patient and graft survival were similar. Patient survival in BW≤ 7 kg was significantly better in the most recent period. CONCLUSION Malnutrition and advanced liver disease were more frequent in BW ≤ 7 kg. Despite increased rates of PVT and longer hospital stay, patient and graft long-term survival were similar between groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Seda Neto
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Barata Ribeiro, 414, cj 65, Bela Vista, SP, Brazil; Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Paulo Chapchap
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Barata Ribeiro, 414, cj 65, Bela Vista, SP, Brazil
| | - Flavia H Feier
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Barata Ribeiro, 414, cj 65, Bela Vista, SP, Brazil; Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Renata Pugliese
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Barata Ribeiro, 414, cj 65, Bela Vista, SP, Brazil; Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Vincenzi
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Barata Ribeiro, 414, cj 65, Bela Vista, SP, Brazil; Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Marcel R Benavides
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Barata Ribeiro, 414, cj 65, Bela Vista, SP, Brazil; Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Karina Roda
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Barata Ribeiro, 414, cj 65, Bela Vista, SP, Brazil; Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Mário Kondo
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Barata Ribeiro, 414, cj 65, Bela Vista, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo A Fonseca
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Barata Ribeiro, 414, cj 65, Bela Vista, SP, Brazil; Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Right Lobe Versus Left Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Donor and Recipient Outcomes. Transplantation 2022; 106:2370-2378. [PMID: 35802908 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an established treatment for advanced liver disease. Whether right lobe (RL) or left lobe (LL) LDLT provides the best outcomes for donors and recipients remains contentious. METHODS MedLine, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central were searched to identify studies comparing RL- and LL-LDLT and reporting donor and/or recipient outcomes. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effect meta-analysis. Meta-regressions were used to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS Sixty-seven studies were included. RL donors were more likely to experience major complications (relative risk [RR] = 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-2.05; I2 = 19%) than LL donors; however, no difference was observed in the risk of any biliary complication (RR = 1.41; 95% CI = 0.91-2.20; I2 = 59%), bile leaks (RR = 1.56; 95% CI = 0.97-2.51; I2 = 52%), biliary strictures (RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.43-1.88; I2 = 27%), or postoperative death (RR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.25-1.05; I2 = 0%). Among recipients, the incidence of major complications (RR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.68-1.06; I2 = 21%), biliary complications (RR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.91-1.33; I2 = 8%), and vascular complications (RR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.44-1.43; I2 = 0%) was similar. Although the rate of small for size syndrome (RR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.30-0.74; I2 = 0%) and postoperative deaths (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.44-0.87; I2 = 0%) was lower among RL-LDLT recipients, no differences were observed in long-term graft (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.55-1.38; I2 = 74%) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.60-1.22; I2 = 44%). CONCLUSIONS LL donors experience fewer complications than RL donors, and LL-LDLT recipients had similar outcomes to RL-LDLT recipients. These findings suggest that LL-LDLT offers the best outcomes for living donors and similar outcomes for recipients when measures are taken to prevent small for size syndrome.
Collapse
|
7
|
Reine PK, Feier F, da Fonseca EA, Hernandes RG, Seda-Neto J. Quality of life, depression and anxiety in potential living liver donors for pediatric recipients: A retrospective single center experience. World J Hepatol 2022; 14:1899-1906. [PMID: 36340749 PMCID: PMC9627440 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i10.1899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor liver transplantation is a safe alternative for patients on a liver transplant list. Donor evaluation goes beyond physical variables to include social, emotional, and ethical aspects. The role of pre-donation sociopsychological evaluation of the donor candidate is as important to the success of the procedure as is the medical assessment. Success implies recovery from the operation and prompt engagement in pre-transplant professional and social activities, without leading to psychological or physical distress. Psychological profiling of potential living liver donors (PLLD) and evaluation of quality of life (QOL) can influence outcomes.
AIM To evaluate the socio-demographics and psychological aspects (QOL, depression, and anxiety) of PLLD for pediatric liver transplantation in a cohort of 250 patients.
METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 250 PLLD who underwent psychological pre-donation evaluation between 2015 and 2019. All the recipients were children. The Beck anxiety inventory, Beck depression inventory, and 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores were used to evaluate anxiety (Beck anxiety inventory), depression (Beck depression inventory), and QOL, respectively.
RESULTS A total of 250 PLLD were evaluated. Most of them were women (54.4%), and the mean age was 29.2 ± 7.2 years. A total of 120 (48.8%) PLLD were employed at the time of evaluation for donation; however, most had low income (57% earned < 2 times the minimum wage). A total of 110 patients (44%) did not finish the donation process, and 247 PLLD answered a questionnaire to evaluate depression, anxiety, and QOL (SF-36). Prevalence of depression was of 5.2% and anxiety 3.6%. Although most of the PLLD were optimistic regarding the donation process and never had doubts about becoming a donor, some traces of ambivalence were observed: 46% of the respondents said they would feel relieved if a deceased donor became available.
CONCLUSION PLLD had a low prevalence of anxiety and depression. The foundation for effective and satisfactory results can be found in the pre-transplantation process, during which evaluations must follow rigorous criteria to mitigate potential harm in the future. Pre-donation psychological evaluation plays a predictive role in post-donation emotional responses and mental health issues. The impact of such findings on the donation process and outcomes needs to be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula K Reine
- Department of Psychology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo 01308901, Brazil
| | - Flavia Feier
- Department ofLiver Transplantation, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90020090, Brazil
| | | | - Rosely G Hernandes
- Department of Psychology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo 01308901, Brazil
| | - Joao Seda-Neto
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo 01308901, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Living Donor Liver Transplantation as a Backup Procedure: Treatment Strategy for Hepatocellular Adenomas Requiring Complex Resections. Case Rep Surg 2022; 2022:1015061. [PMID: 35223125 PMCID: PMC8872689 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1015061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims. The most dangerous complications of hepatocellular adenomas are hemorrhage and malignant transformation, both of which require surgical treatment. The surgical treatment strategy for patients with benign large or central tumors is challenging because complex liver resections are required. The strategy of using a live donor as a backup procedure is described in this series. Methods. We present a series of three patients with large hepatocellular adenoma lesions showing a central location, for which the living donor liver transplantation strategy was used as a backup procedure. Results. Hepatocellular adenoma was confirmed by biopsy in all patients. Surgical resection was indicated because of the patients’ symptoms and lesion size and growth. All patients had a lesion that was central or in close contact with major vessels. The final decision to proceed with the resection was made intraoperatively. A live donor was prepared for all three patients. Two patients underwent portal vein embolization associated with extended hepatectomy, and a total hepatectomy plus liver transplantation with a living donor was performed in one patient. All patients had good postoperative outcomes. Conclusions. In the treatment of hepatocellular adenomas for which complex resections are necessary and resectability can only be confirmed intraoperatively, surgical safety can be improved through the use of a living donor backup. Center expertise with living donor liver transplantation is paramount for the success of this approach.
Collapse
|
9
|
Shi YX, Zhang HM, Chen J, Huang YQ, Yu MM, Jin YH, Wang WR, Gao W. Health-Related Quality of Life in Predominantly Young Parental Living Liver Donors: A Cross-Sectional Study in China. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:726103. [PMID: 34660636 PMCID: PMC8517132 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.726103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of donors deserves attention and must be considered for a long time. Many of the published studies had small sample sizes, and research from mainland China, in particular, is scant. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the HRQoL of living liver donors and identify the influencing factors of the HRQoL in mainland China. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. The data were collected from the liver transplantation center, the Tianjin First Center Hospital, China. Living liver donors older than 18 years and at a minimum of 1-month, post-donation was included. The HRQoL was evaluated using the Medical Outcome Study Short form 36 (SF-36). Sociodemographic and clinical-related variables, HRQoL status, and its potential impact factors were analyzed. Results: A total of 382 living liver donors completed the survey. The median number of months post-donation was 25, and parental donors (99.2%) were the most frequent relationship. The majority of the participants (372, 97.4%) donated their left lateral lobes. Thirty-two (8.4%) donors suffered complications, and of them, 7 suffered from biliary leakage (1.8%), which was the most common one in this study. The physical functioning (PF), role–physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), social functioning (SF), role–emotional (RE), and mental health (MH) scores among the living liver donors were significantly better than those of the Chinese norms. Short-time post-donation [odds ratio (OR): 0.008; p < 0.001] and male recipients (OR:0.195; p = 0.024) were associated with the likelihood of a poor physical related quality of life. Conclusions: Despite, in general, good HRQoL outcomes, we also believed that liver donation has an obvious influence on the physical functions of liver donors. More attention and long-term follow-ups are necessary for donors at higher risk based on identified influencing factors and correlates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Xian Shi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Hai-Ming Zhang
- Liver Transplantation Center, Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ya-Qi Huang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Ming-Ming Yu
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yin-Hui Jin
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Wen-Ru Wang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Gao
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Neto JS, Fonseca EA, Vincenzi R, Pugliese R, Benavides MR, Roda K, Porta G, Miura IK, Porta A, Borges C, Baggio V, Feier FH, Teng H, Rodrigues ML, Iwase FC, Kondo M, Chapchap P. Technical Choices in Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation: The Path to Reduce Vascular Complications and Improve Survival. Liver Transpl 2020; 26:1644-1651. [PMID: 32852894 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (PLDLT) is a successful therapeutic option for children with chronic and acute liver disease. After early transplant results, many technical advancements were introduced in the field to reduce the rate of complications and improve survival. The aim of this study is to present the outcomes of 975 primary PLDLTs in 3 periods: initial practice (period 1, 29 patients, January 1995 to December 1999), second period (period 2, 331 patients, January 2000 to December 2009), and third period (period 3 [P3], 615 patients, January 2010 to September 2019). Among the technical refinements introduced in P3 are the use of hyperreduced left lateral segment grafts, abdominal wall prosthetic mesh closure, double hepatic artery anastomosis, and increased use of vascular grafts for portal vein reconstruction. The outcomes included significant reductions of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), early portal vein thrombosis (EPVT), and retransplantation, with better patient and graft survival in P3. Additional analyses showed that the factors independently associated with worse 90-day patient survival were HAT, EPVT, and increasing Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease score. In conclusion, the introduction of technical refinements in P3, in addition to improvements in patient care, determined a reduction in EPVT, HAT, and retransplantation. Consequently, patient and graft survival rates increased in all time points studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Seda Neto
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eduardo A Fonseca
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Vincenzi
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renata Pugliese
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcel R Benavides
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Karina Roda
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gilda Porta
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Irene K Miura
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Adriana Porta
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Christian Borges
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vera Baggio
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Flavia H Feier
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Hsiang Teng
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mônica L Rodrigues
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fernanda C Iwase
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mário Kondo
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Chapchap
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Municipal Infantil Menino Jesus, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shorbagy MS, Saleh M, Elbeialy MAK, Elsaid K. Respiratory Complications Among Living Liver Donors: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2020; 18:474-480. [PMID: 32370694 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2019.0394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The safety of living liver donors is considered a high priority. In this study, we aimed to highlight the incidence and risk factors of respiratory complications among living liver transplant donors at our institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated data of 178 related living liver donors who were seen from January 2014 to December 2018. We recorded significant respiratory complications, such as pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, pneumonia, acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and transfusion-related acute lung injury. Complications were noted as clinically evident and/or needing intervention. We also recorded the frequency of nonrespiratory complications and duration of intensive care unit and hospital stays. RESULTS Ten donors (5.6%) developed significant respiratory complications: 2 (1.1%) had pulmonary embolisms, 3 (1.7%) developed symptomatic pleural effusion that required thoracentesis, and 4 (2.25%) had chest infections. The remaining donor (0.6%) had unexplained respiratory insufficiency. Logistic regression analyses identified age ≥ 35 years and previous surgery as the main risk factors of significant respiratory complications. There were no recorded cases of pneumothorax, acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and transfusion-related acute lung injury. Raw surface collection (14.6%) and biliary leakage (7.9%) were the most frequent nonrespiratory complications. There was no significant difference between patients with and without significant respiratory complications with regard to intensive care unit and hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS Despite the low incidence of significant respiratory complications among our living liver donor cohort, close monitoring and early management are essential to achieve better prognosis, especially in donors older than 35 years or those with previous surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed S Shorbagy
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shamsaeefar A, Nikeghbalian S, Kazemi K, Gholami S, Sayadi M, Azadian F, Motazedian N, Malek-Hosseini SA. Donors' Quality of Life after Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Shiraz Organ Transplant Center Experience. Int J Organ Transplant Med 2020; 11:82-87. [PMID: 32832043 PMCID: PMC7430061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probable effects of living donor liver transplantation on the wellbeing of the donor and psychological difficulties are necessary to be understood. OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of life of living donors after liver donation. METHODS 140 living donors who underwent hepatectomy between 2012 and July 2015 were enrolled in this study. Donors were asked to complete the Short Form 36-question Health Survey (SF-36) through face to face or by telephone interview. RESULTS The mean±SD age of donors at transplantation was 32.1±7.3 years; 83 (59.3%) of donors were female. 134 (95.7%) were married. The mean±SD BMI was 23.8±3.5 (kg/m2). "Mother-to-child" was the most frequent relationship (n=79, 56.4%). 22 (15.7%) complications were reported by participants. The mean±SD score of Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary were 48.8±14.6 and 50.1±6.9, respectively. CONCLUSION Most living donors sustain a near average quality of life post-donation. It seems that living donation does not negatively affect the quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Shamsaeefar
- Shiraz Organ Transplant Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - S. Nikeghbalian
- Shiraz Organ Transplant Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - K. Kazemi
- Shiraz Organ Transplant Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - S. Gholami
- Shiraz Organ Transplant Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - M. Sayadi
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - F. Azadian
- Non-Communicable Disease Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - N. Motazedian
- Shiraz Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran,Correspondence: Nasrin Motazedian, Shiraz Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. E-mail:
| | - S. A. Malek-Hosseini
- Shiraz Organ Transplant Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goja S, Yadav SK, Saigal S, Soin AS. Right lobe donor hepatectomy: is it safe? A retrospective study. Transpl Int 2017; 31:600-609. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Goja
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine; Medanta-The Medicity; Gurgaon Delhi (NCR) India
| | - Sanjay Kumar Yadav
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine; Medanta-The Medicity; Gurgaon Delhi (NCR) India
| | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine; Medanta-The Medicity; Gurgaon Delhi (NCR) India
| | - Arvinder Singh Soin
- Institute of Liver Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine; Medanta-The Medicity; Gurgaon Delhi (NCR) India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Background With the use of split liver grafts as well as living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) it is imperative to know the minimum graft volume to avoid complications. Most current formulas to predict standard liver volume (SLV) rely on weight-based measures that are likely inaccurate in the setting of cirrhosis. Therefore, we sought to create a formula for estimating SLV without weight-based covariates. Methods LDLT donors underwent computed tomography scan volumetric evaluation of their livers. An optimal formula for calculating SLV using the anthropomorphic measure thoracoabdominal circumference (TAC) was determined using leave-one-out cross-validation. The ability of this formula to correctly predict liver volume was checked against other existing formulas by analysis of variance. The ability of the formula to predict small grafts in LDLT was evaluated by exact logistic regression. Results The optimal formula using TAC was determined to be SLV = (TAC × 3.5816) − (Age × 3.9844) − (Sex × 109.7386) − 934.5949. When compared to historic formulas, the current formula was the only one which was not significantly different than computed tomography determined liver volumes when compared by analysis of variance with Dunnett posttest. When evaluating the ability of the formula to predict small for size syndrome, many (10/16) of the formulas tested had significant results by exact logistic regression, with our formula predicting small for size syndrome with an odds ratio of 7.94 (95% confidence interval, 1.23-91.36; P = 0.025). Conclusion We report a formula for calculating SLV that does not rely on weight-based variables that has good ability to predict SLV and identify patients with potentially small grafts.
Collapse
|
15
|
Donor Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation—Analysis of 275 Donors From a Single Centre in India. Transplantation 2016; 100:1251-6. [PMID: 27203592 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|