Change Narratives That Elude Quantification: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of How People with Chronic Pain Perceive Pain Rehabilitation

Patients' experiences of occupational therapy within a multidisciplinary pain management programme: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Occupational problems are common for adults experiencing chronic pain, but occupational therapists are not always accessed as part of the multidisciplinary team. Despite evidence of benefit for work-focused interventions, there is limited evidence for broader benefit from occupational therapy interventions within the context of multidisciplinary pain management. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of programme attendees who received structured intervention from an occupational therapist as part of a multidisciplinary pain management programme, and gain an understanding as to how they felt it influenced changes they made to occupational participation.

METHOD

A qualitative approach was undertaken with 9 individual patients recruited from a group pain management programme for adults with chronic low back pain. Semi-structured interviews were carried out, recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes in the data.

RESULTS

Three key themes were identified: 1) the helpfulness of activity pacing techniques 2) the value of participating in a therapeutic activity-based session and 3) an increased understanding of the importance of leisure and creative activities in the context of their lives.

CONCLUSION

Participants perceived the specific occupational therapy content of the programme to be helpful in a number of different ways. The findings suggest that occupational therapy can be important in facilitating patients to apply theoretical techniques in the real world, thereby increasing the likelihood of long term benefit.

Pain Rehabilitation's Effect on People in Chronic Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study

Multidisciplinary long-term pain rehabilitation programs with a team of healthcare professionals are an integrated approach to treat patients with chronic non-malignant pain. In this longitudinal prospective cohort study, we investigated the long-term effects of multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation on the self-reported causes of pain, pain self-management strategies, sleep, pain severity, and pain’s interference with life, pre- and post-treatment. Eighty-one patients, aged 20–69 years, with chronic pain responded. The two most frequently reported perceived causes of pain were fibromyalgia and accidents. The difference in average self-reported pain severity decreased significantly at one-year follow-up (p < 0.001), as did pain’s interference with general activities, mood, walking ability, sleep, and enjoyment of life. At one-year follow-up, participants (21%) rated their health as good/very good and were more likely to state that it was better than a year before (20%). No change was found in the use of pain self-management strategies such as physical training at one-year follow-up. The intervention was effective for the participants, as reflected in the decreased pain severity and pain interference with life.

The Importance of Perceived Relevance: A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient's Perceptions of Value and Impact Following a Low-Intensity Group-Based Pain Management Program

Background and objectives: Limited evidence exists exploring perceptions of which aspects of a pain management program are perceived as valuable and impactful. The aim of this study was to explore patient beliefs about which aspects of a pain management program were valued and/or had perceived impact. Materials and Methods: One-on-one structured interviews were conducted with 11 adults three months after their completion of the Spark Pain Program at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Concepts in the transcripts were inductively identified and explored, utilizing thematic analysis to better understand their relevance to the study aim. Results: Four themes emerged: (1) "The program overall was positive, but…"; (2) "I valued my improved knowledge and understanding of pain, but…"; (3) "I valued the stretching/relaxation/pacing/activity monitoring"; and (4) "I valued being part of a supportive and understanding group". Participants reported that they liked being treated as an individual within the group. A lack of perceived personal relevance of key messages was identified in some participants; it appears that patients in pain programs must determine that changes in knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes are personally relevant in order for the changes to have a significant impact on them. Conclusions: This study provides new insights into aspects of a pain management program that were perceived as valuable and impactful, areas that "missed the mark", and hypotheses to guide the implementation of service delivery and program redesign.

A Mixed Methods Analysis of Acute Upper Extremity Pain as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System

Introduction

Chronic pain affects U.S. service member’s (SMs) more disproportionately than individuals in the general public. SMs have unique cultural pressures to ignore or deny acute pain; therefore, the beliefs and behaviors of this group may cause them to self-report their acute pain in a specific manner. This study evaluated the strength of the relationship of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) upper extremity computer adaptive test (CAT) and assessed U.S. active duty SMs experience of acute pain and function compared to the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH). In addition, the PROMIS pain interference CAT, PROMIS pain behavior CAT, and PROMIS anxiety CAT were correlated to the PROMIS upper extremity CAT and QuickDASH questionnaires.

Materials and Methods

This mixed methods, sequential, explanatory study included a convenience sample of 26 participants from two occupational therapy clinics. Participants were administered five self-report questionnaires at initial evaluation and at follow up (30–90 day). At follow up, 12 participants completed a semi-structured interview. Categorical variables were summarized using percentages and analyzed using a chi-square goodness of fit test. A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the linear relationship between the QuickDASH and specified PROMIS questionnaires. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Brooke Army Medical Center, reference number C.2017.173d.

Results

The initial and follow up scores from the self-report questionnaires demonstrated a good to excellent correlation between the PROMIS upper extremity CAT and the QuickDASH (r = –0.65; r = –0.81; p &lt; 0.001). Qualitative data were gathered during a semi-structured interview of 12 participants after the follow up and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Three themes emerged from qualitative analysis of data: (1) impact of military culture, (2) psychosocial effects of acute pain, and (3) therapist contributions to disability awareness.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates several cultural and psychosocial influences concerning the experience of SMs with acute UE disability and pain, which were not previously reported for this population.

Qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary chronic pain intervention: outcomes and barriers and facilitators to ongoing pain management

Background

Many leaders in the field of chronic pain treatment consider interdisciplinary pain management programs to be the most effective treatments available for chronic pain. As programs are instituted and expanded to address demands for nonpharmacological chronic pain interventions, we need to better understand how patients experience program impacts, as well as the challenges and supports patients encounter in trying to maintain and build on intervention gains.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative evaluation of an interdisciplinary chronic pain coaching program at the Atlanta Veterans Affairs. A purposive sample of Veterans were engaged in interviews (n=41) and focus groups (n=20) to elicit patient outcomes and barriers and facilitators to sustainment of improvements. Transcripts were analyzed using matrix and thematic analyses.

Results

Veterans reported various outcomes. Most frequently they described adopting new self-care or lifestyle practices for pain management and health. They also often described accepting pain, being better able to adjust and set boundaries, feeling more in control, participating in life, and changing their medication use. A small portion of the sample reported no improvement in their conditions. When outcomes were examined as a whole, individuals described impacts that could be placed along a spectrum from whole life change to no change. Facilitators to maintenance of improvements included having building blocks (eg, carrying forward practices learned), support (eg, access to resources), and energy (eg, motivation), and improving incrementally. Challenges were not having building blocks (eg, life disruptions), support (eg, unknown follow-up options), and energy (eg, competing demands) and having an unbalanced rate of improvement.

Conclusion

Most Veterans identified experiencing multiple areas of improvement, especially learning about and taking up new pain and general health management skills. Ensuring participants can build on and find support for these outcomes when applying what they have learned in their dynamic social and physical worlds remains a challenge for this program and other relatively short-term interdisciplinary chronic pain interventions.