Treatments for Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions

Cutaneous adverse reactions associated with COVID-19 vaccines: Current evidence and potential immune mechanisms

As the number of vaccinated individuals has increased, there have been increasing reports of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. The main COVID-19 vaccines administered include messenger ribonucleic acid vaccines, non-replicating viral vector vaccines, inactivated whole-virus vaccines, and protein-based vaccines. These vaccines contain active components such as polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, aluminum, tromethamine, and disodium edetate dihydrate. Recent advances in understanding the coordination of inflammatory responses by specific subsets of lymphocytes have led to a new classification based on immune response patterns. We categorize these responses into four patterns: T helper (Th)1-, Th2-, Th17/22-, and Treg-polarized cutaneous inflammation after stimulation of COVID-19 vaccines. Although the association between COVID-19 vaccination and these cutaneous adverse reactions remains controversial, the occurrence of rare dermatoses and their short intervals suggest a possible relationship. Despite the potential adverse reactions, the administration of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial in the ongoing battle against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome From Combined Allopurinol and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: A Narrative Review

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is a severe and potentially debilitating skin reaction frequently related to medication use. Allopurinol and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are commonly prescribed medications for prevalent health conditions worldwide, and their interaction associated with SJS warrants further investigation. A comprehensive literature search was performed to investigate cases as studies related to SJS occurring in patients with concomitant use of allopurinol and ACE inhibitors. We identified case reports and studies detailing hypersensitivity reactions, including SJS, attributed to a combination of allopurinol and ACE inhibitors. Despite the drug-drug interactions or lack thereof seen in patient populations, there is no definitive evidence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between allopurinol and ACE inhibitors. We were only able to find one case report specifically detailing SJS in a patient on combined ACE inhibitors and allopurinol. While the exact mechanism of the interaction is unclear, those reported cases of severe hypersensitivity reactions suggest a previous history of impaired renal function as a predisposing factor in the development of SJS. The potential risk of SJS with coadministration of ACE inhibitors and allopurinol is a drug-drug interaction that physicians should be aware of. This topic requires additional attention to determine if this drug combination should be avoided entirely in certain patients.

Role of Silver Nitrate Spray for Skin Wound Care in Patients with Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Our Experience in 4 Patients

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are examples of severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs (SCARs) with several international recommendations for global medical management, ranging from pharmacological systemic therapy to skin wound care. There is no defined best management of the skin wounds in SJS/TEN. The care of wounds is essential to initiate re-epithelialization. Our objective is to improve the cicatrization process, avoiding scarring due to deepening of the wounds, as well as prevent infections, achieve pain control, and avoid loss of serum proteins, fluids, and electrolytes. In this retrospective case series, we highlight the value of systemic therapy and the use of silver nitrate for wound management in four patients with TEN.

Case report: Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption mimicking epidermal necrolysis

Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE) is the most severe form of fixed drug eruption and can be misdiagnosed as epidermal necrolysis (EN). We report the case of a 42-year-old male patient presenting with more than 50% skin detachment without defined areas of exanthema or erythema and a history of one prior event of EN caused by acetaminophen (paracetamol), allopurinol, or amoxicillin 1.5 years ago. The initial diagnosis was GBFDE or EN. The histology of a skin biopsy was unable to distinguish between the two diseases. The course of the disease, the later clinical presentation, and the medical and medication history, however, were in favor of a diagnosis of GBFDE with two potentially culprit drugs: metamizole and ibuprofen. Moxifloxacin, enoxaparin sodium, hydromorphone, and insulin human were administered concomitantly, which makes them suspicious as well. Unfortunately, the patient received an additional dose of metamizole, one of the possible causative drugs, and he developed another bullous reaction within 1 month. This led to the diagnosis of GBFDE due to metamizole. This report highlights the challenges of distinguishing two rare diseases and elucidates the importance of distinct clinical presentation and detailed medication history.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions: A single-center retrospective study of 209 cases in China

BACKGROUND

Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCAR) are life-threatening and contain drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP).

METHODS

We aimed to evaluate clinical features and prognostic factors for SCAR patients. From January 2010 to April 2022, 209 patients with SCAR (DRESS, n = 46, SJS/TEN, n = 128, AGEP, n = 35) were included in this study. Clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, causative drugs, disease courses, treatments, and outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Antibiotics ranked first (35.9 %) followed by traditional Chinese medicine (15.8 %) and antiepileptic drugs (14.8 %) among causative drugs of SCAR. One patient (2.2 %) with DRESS and seven patients (5.5 %) with SJS/TEN died in the hospital, while there was no AGEP-related mortality. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions score (OR = 2.340, 95 % CI = 1.192-4.591) and hemoglobin < 100 g/L (OR = 0.126, 95 % CI = 0.016-0.983) were independent risk factors of DRESS. Anemia (OR = 0.191, 95 % CI = 0.037-0.984) and body surface area detached involved at day 1 (OR = 2.749, 95 % CI = 1.115-6.778) were independent risk factors of SJS/TEN for severe acute complications and hospital death (P < 0.05). Lymphocytopenia (OR = 0.004, 95 % CI = 0.000-0.553) was a risk factor of AGEP for acute complications (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals the clinical features and independent prognostic factors for SCAR, which may be helpful in the clinical management for SCAR patients.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA-B*13:01 screening for the prevention of co-trimoxazole-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions among HIV-infected patients in Thailand

Studies found a strong association between HLA-B*13:01 allele and co-trimoxazole-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Genetic screening before initiation of co-trimoxazole may decrease the incidence of co-trimoxazole-induced SCARs. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HLA-B*13:01 screening before co-trimoxazole initiation in HIV-infected patients in Thailand. A combination of a decision tree model and a Markov model was used to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes of two strategies including 1) HLA-B*13:01 screening before co-trimoxazole initiation and 2) usual practice from a societal perspective. Alternative drugs are not considered because dapsone (the second-line drug) also presents a genetic risk. Input parameters were obtained from literature, government documents, and part of the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database (TAHOD). One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic analyses were performed to determine robustness of the findings. HLA-B*13:01 screening resulted in 0.0061 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) loss with an additional cost of 370 THB ($11.84). At the cost-effectiveness threshold of 160,000 THB ($5,112.85), the probability of the genetic screening strategy being cost-effective is 9.54%. This analysis demonstrated that HLA-B*13:01 allele screening before initiation of co-trimoxazole among HIV-infected patients is unlikely to be cost-effective in Thailand. Our findings will help policymakers make an evidence-informed decision making.

Etanercept leads to a rapid recovery of a Dabrafenib-/Trametinib-associated toxic epidermal necrolysis-like severe skin reaction

Targeted therapy with BRAF- and MEK-Inhibitors (BRAFi, MEKi) provides an excellent therapeutic option for patients with malignant melanomas with a BRAF-Mutation. Mild cutaneous adverse events have been common under the BRAF- and MEK-Inhibitor therapy, on the contrary, severe cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs (SCARs) are rarely reported. We present the case of a 59- year-old female patient who after the resection of cutaneous in-transit metastases of a malignant melanoma received one adjuvant cycle of Nivolumab followed by a switch of the therapy to an oral BRAFi/MEKi therapy. 3-4 Weeks after the therapy switch she developed high fever, chills, progredient general weakness, headaches, abdominal complaints, generalised rash as well as thrombocytopaenia, eosinophilia, elevated liver enzymes, declining kidney, and pulmonary function as well as a maculopapular exanthema. She was diagnosed with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and quickly started recovery after initiation of a high steroid substitution. Under steroid dose reduction, the exanthema worsened and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) was histologically diagnosed. After a series of unsuccessful therapeutic approaches (high dose steroid, human immunoglobulins and ciclosporin) the patient received a single dose of the TNF-alpha inhibitor etanercept, which led to a quick recovery. This case demonstrates that DRESS and TEN can present a spectrum of possibly transitioning SCARs providing a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Nevertheless, in a such complicated therapeutic setting, etanercept may be lifesaving even after multiple previous unsuccessful therapies. This effective approach provides evidence SCARs due to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy may be driven by TNF-alpha.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions among people living with human immunodeficiency virus in a tertiary care hospital in Johor, Malaysia

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) among people living with HIV (PLWH) are common. Data on drug eruptions among PLWH in Malaysia are limited. Thus, our study aimed to determine the clinical patterns of cADRs among PLWH and the risk factors associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among PLWH who developed cADRs presenting to our dermatology clinic from June 2020 to December 2020. The Naranjo scale was used for drug causality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 78 PLWH were recruited with a male-to-female ratio of 12:1. The maculopapular eruption was the commonest type of cADRs (75.6%), followed by drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) (15.4%). SCAR is defined as a potentially life-threatening, immunologically mediated, drug-induced disease, accounting for 17.9% of the cases. Most of the patients were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) (85.9%), with efavirenz + tenofovir/emtricitabine being the most common combination (80.6%). Efavirenz (51.3%) was the main culprit drug implicated, followed by trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (23.1%) and nevirapine (11.5%). CD4 T-cell count <100 cells/μL (p = 0.006) was the independent risk factor for SCAR. Most cases had probable causal relationships with the culprit drugs (84.6%) and were not preventable (93.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The commonest cADR seen in PLWH was maculopapular eruption, while efavirenz, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and nevirapine were the three main implicated drugs. Most of the cases had probable drug causality and were not preventable. PLWH with CD4 count <100 cells/μL were particularly at risk of developing SCAR. Overall, this study showed that immune suppression and polypharmacy as a consequence of opportunistic infection prophylaxis are important factors contributing to the increased risk of ADRs among PLWH.

Severe and life-threatening COVID-19-related mucocutaneous eruptions: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Earlier diagnosis and the best management of virus-related, drug-related or mixed severe potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous reactions of COVID-19 patients are of great concern. These patients, especially hospitalised cases, are usually in a complicated situation (because of multi-organ failures), which makes their management more challenging. In such consultant cases, achieving by the definite beneficial management strategies that therapeutically address all concurrent comorbidities are really hard to reach or even frequently impossible.

METHODS

According to the lack of any relevant systematic review, we thoroughly searched the databases until 5 October 2020 and finally found 57 articles including 93 patients. It is needed to know clinical presentations of these severe skin eruptions, signs and symptoms of COVID in these patients, time of skin rash appearance, classifying drug-related or virus-related skin lesions, classifying the type of skin rash, patients' outcome and concurrent both COVID-19 therapy and skin rash treatment.

RESULT

Severe and potential life-threatening mucocutaneous dermatologic manifestations of COVID-19 usually may be divided into three major categories: virus-associated, drug-associated, and those with uncertainty about the exact origin. Angioedema, vascular lesions, toxic shock syndrome, erythroderma, DRESS, haemorrhagic bulla, AGEP, EM, SJS and TEN, generalised pustular figurate erythema were the main entities found as severe dermatologic reactions in all categories.

CONCLUSION

We can conclude vascular injuries may be the most common cause of severe dermatologic manifestations of COVID-19, which is concordant with many proposed hypercoagulation tendencies and systemic inflammatory response syndrome as one of the most important pathomechanisms of COVID-19 so the skin may show these features in various presentations and degrees.

Inherent clinical properties of non-immediate hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media

BACKGROUND

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) is a frequently used compound in radiology. Non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) appear when a patient leaves the department and usually are undocumented. True hypersensitivity in this group is rarely proved.

METHODS

Single-centre 2014-2018 data were retrospectively analysed. HSR to ICM were classified and investigated according to the time of occurrence (immediate <1 hour, non-immediate >1 hour). ENDA questionnaire and skin tests (prick or intradermal test) were performed according to ENDA/EAACI recommendations.

RESULTS

69 patients with a clinical history of HSR to ICM were identified, 72.46% were females (n = 50). The average age was 56 (SD ± 13.16) years. Non-immediate HSR occurred in 28.99% (n = 20) patients. The suspected culprit drugs were: iodixanol 20% (n = 4), iopromide 5% (n = 1), diatrizoate 10% (n = 2) and iohexol 10% (n = 2). Among non-immediate HSR 96.00% (n = 19) of patients had skin rashes. A statistically significant correlation was found between the clinical symptoms and the type of reaction (p-value <0.05): isolated skin manifestations mostly occurred in non-immediate HSR 75.00% (n = 15). Only 13.04% (n = 9) of all the patients were proved to be allergic to a certain ICM after the proposed diagnostic workup.

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of the hypersensitivity reactions investigated were classified as non-immediate type. Most of them manifested with isolated skin symptoms. The most frequent culprit drug encountered was iodixanol. The overall non-immediate hypersensitivity confirmation rate after diagnostic evaluation was only 15%.

Pustular Psoriasis and Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis

The similarity between pustular psoriasis (PP) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) poses problems in the diagnosis and treatment of these two conditions. Significant clinical and histopathologic overlap exists between PP and AGEP. PP is an inflammatory disorder that has numerous clinical subtypes, but all with sterile pustules composed of neutrophils. AGEP is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction that is also characterized by non-follicular sterile pustules. Clinical features that suggest a diagnosis of PP over AGEP include a history of psoriasis and the presence of scaling plaques. Histologically, eosinophilic spongiosis, vacuolar interface dermatitis, and dermal eosinophilia favor a diagnosis of AGEP over PP. Importantly, PP and AGEP vary in clinical course and treatment. PP treatment involves topical steroids, oral retinoids, and systemic immunosuppressants. Newer therapies targeting IL-36, IL-23, IL-1, and PDE-4 have been investigated. The removal of the offending agent is a crucial part of the treatment of AGEP.

Severe Generalized Bullous Fixed Drug Eruption Treated with Cyclosporine: A Case Report and Literature Review

Generalized bullous fixed drug eruptions (GBFDEs) are rare in the paediatric population. We present the case of a 7-year-old girl with GBFDE believed to be secondary to oral ibuprofen, who experienced rapid resolution of lesions and cessation of blistering with a 3-week course of oral cyclosporine. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a paediatric case of GBFDE treated with cyclosporine. In our report, we review published cases of GBFDE in children, and all adult cases managed with cyclosporine.

Drug hapten-specific T-cell activation: Current status and unanswered questions

Drug haptens are formed from the irreversible, covalent binding of drugs to nucleophilic moieties on proteins, which can warrant adverse reactions in the body including severe delayed-type, T-cell mediated, drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs). While three main pathways exist for the activation of T-cells in DHRs, namely the hapten model, the pharmacological interaction model and the altered peptide repertoire model, the exact antigenic determinants responsible have not yet been defined. In recent years, progress has been made using advanced mass spectrometry-based proteomic methods to identify protein carriers and characterise the structure of drug-haptenated proteins. Since genome-wide association studies discovered a link between human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and an individual's susceptibility to DHRs, much effort has been made to define the drug-associated HLA ligands driving T-cell activation, including the elution of natural HLA peptides from HLA molecules and the generation of HLA-binding peptides. In this review, we discuss our current methodology used to design and synthesise drug-modified HLA ligands to investigate their immunogenicity using T-cell models, and thus their implication in drug hypersensitivity.

Pharmacogenomics for Primary Care: An Overview

Most of the prescribing and dispensing of medicines happens in primary care. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is the study and clinical application of the role of genetic variation on drug response. Mounting evidence suggests PGx can improve the safety and/or efficacy of several medications commonly prescribed in primary care. However, implementation of PGx has generally been limited to a relatively few academic hospital centres, with little adoption in primary care. Despite this, many primary healthcare providers are optimistic about the role of PGx in their future practice. The increasing prevalence of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and primary care PGx studies herald the plausible gradual introduction of PGx into primary care and highlight the changes needed for optimal translation. In this article, the potential utility of PGx in primary care will be explored and on-going barriers to implementation discussed. The evidence base of several drug-gene pairs relevant to primary care will be outlined with a focus on antidepressants, codeine and tramadol, statins, clopidogrel, warfarin, metoprolol and allopurinol. This review is intended to provide both a general introduction to PGx with a more in-depth overview of elements relevant to primary care.

The interferon-γ-induced protein 10/CXCR3 axis is associated with human herpesvirus-6 reactivation and the development of sequelae in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms

BACKGROUND

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a condition caused by a drug-induced immune response. Previous reports have found that CXCL10, also known as interferon-γ-induced protein (IP)-10, may participate in the pathogenesis of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. However, the exact role of IP-10 in DRESS and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) has remained unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This comparative prospective cohort study aimed to ascertain the roles of the IP-10/CXCR3 axis in DRESS and SJS/TEN.

METHODS

Plasma IP-10 levels were analysed, and univariate analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between IP-10, human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 reactivation and the development of long-term sequelae. We also performed immunohistochemical staining using skin specimens and flow cytometry to determine the expression of CXCR3 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

RESULTS

Significantly higher plasma IP-10 levels were observed in patients with DRESS with long-term sequelae (effect size 0·81) and also in those with HHV-6 reactivation (effect size 0·83). By immunohistochemistry, more abundant IP-10⁺ and CXCR3⁺ cells were demonstrated in the skin lesions of patients with DRESS with HHV-6 reactivation. The percentages of CLA⁺  CXCR3⁺  CD4⁺ cells and CLA⁺  CXCR3⁺  CD8⁺ cells were also higher in the PBMCs of HHV-6-reactivated patients with DRESS than in those of patients with SJS/TEN.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher plasma IP-10 levels are associated with the development of long-term sequelae in DRESS. Higher IP-10/CXCR3 expression in skin and more abundant CLA⁺  CXCR3⁺  CD4⁺ cells and CLA⁺  CXCR3⁺  CD8⁺ cells were observed in patients with DRESS with HHV-6 reactivation. The IP-10/CXCR3 axis is associated with HHV-6 reactivation and development of long-term sequelae in DRESS. What is already known about this topic? Elevated levels of interferon-γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10) have been observed in patients with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Patients with DRESS tend to develop long-term autoimmune sequelae, including type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroiditis. IP-10 has been associated with these autoimmune diseases in previous studies. What does this study add? The patients with DRESS with HHV-6 reactivation exhibited higher levels of IP-10 in the plasma and skin than the patients with DRESS without HHV-6 reactivation and the patients with SJS/TEN. Patients with DRESS with higher plasma IP-10 levels tended to develop sequelae during long-term follow-up. What is the translational message? IP-10 is a useful biomarker to predict the development of long-term sequelae in patients with DRESS. Linked Comment: Belloón and Kardaun. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:804-805.

Mechanisms of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions: Recent Advances

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions are unpredictable and include various different skin conditions of varying degrees of severity. The most concerning are usually referred to as severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) and include acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS) or hypersensitivity syndrome (HSS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). All are delayed type IV hypersensitivity reactions in which a T-cell-mediated drug-specific immune response is responsible for causing the disease. Nonetheless, specific T-cell subpopulations develop in response to certain environmental conditions and produce cytokines that orchestrate the various phenotypes. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), T-helper type 1 (Th1), Th2, Th17, and regulatory T cells (Treg), among other T-cell subpopulations, participate in the development of SCAR phenotypes. Cell subpopulations belonging to the innate immune system, comprising natural killer cells, innate lymphoid cells, monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells, can also participate in shaping specific immune responses in various clinical conditions. Additionally, tissue-resident cells, including keratinocytes, can contribute to epidermal damage by secreting chemokines that attract pro-inflammatory immunocytes. The final phenotypes in each clinical entity result from the complex interactions between a variety of cell lineages, their products, soluble mediators and genetic and environmental factors. Although the pathophysiology of these reactions is not fully understood, intensive research in recent years has led to major progress in our understanding of the contribution of certain cell types and soluble mediators to the variability of SCAR phenotypes.

HIV infection confers distinct mechanisms in severe drug eruption: Endogenous virus activation with aberrant Th2/Th1 and CD8+ T cells function

Severe drug eruption (SDE), a common skin disease, becomes dangerous when it occurs in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Forty patients including HIV⁺ SDE⁺ (n = 15), HIV^- SDE⁺ (n = 15) and HIV⁺ SDE^- (n = 10) subjects were enrolled in our study. All HIV⁺ patients were at acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) stage. Serum levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-13, IL-6, CXCL9, and CCL17 were quantified by ELISA. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) loads were quantified by RT-qPCR. CD4, CD8, Th1, Th2, TNF-α-CD8, and IFN-γ-CD8 T cell populations were measured by flow cytometry. Levels of biochemical indexes in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients were significantly different from in HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). EBV and CMV viral loads were significantly higher in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients, but not in HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). Inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IFN-γ were significantly elevated in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). Th2/Th1 populations and TNF-α secreting or IFN-γ secreting CD8⁺ T cells, were significantly up-regulated in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients compared to HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). Conversely, the CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly down-regulated in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients compared to HIV^- SDE⁺ patients (P < .05). HIV infection confers distinct clinical phenotypes and immune inflammatory mechanisms in SDE. Sustained EBV and CMV activation, unbalanced Th2/Th1 and overactive CD8⁺ T cells mediating a pro-inflammatory response could act as distinct mechanisms in the aggravation of SDE in HIV⁺ SDE⁺ patients.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis simulating toxic epidermal necrolysis: case presentation and literature review

Background

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe cutaneous adverse reactions. These rare conditions differ in clinical presentation, pathological features, treatment and prognosis, but overlap has been described implying a challenging clinical management.

Case presentation

We describe a case of overlap between TEN and AGEP probably secondary to beta-lactams in a 77-year-old patient treated for a complicated cholangitis. We review the diagnosis and the management of these two conditions. The diagnosis of TEN was suggested by the initial clinical presentation with severe hemodynamic instability, skin detachment, positive Nikolsky sign and mucosal involvement. However, the skin biopsy as well as the rapid improvement of the skin lesions were discriminative for AGEP. This indicated an overlap presentation. Unfortunately, the patient refused allergy investigations in order to find the culprit drug. Medical photographs, proper physical examination and histopathological results are integrated.

Conclusion

Despite clinical features indicating a diagnosis of TEN, histopathology was conclusive for AGEP thus indicating a possible clinical-pathological overlap between the two conditions, a scarcely described situation in the medical literature. To our knowledge, this is one of the few cases that portrays a TEN–AGEP overlap probably secondary to Piperacillin Tazobactam. Understanding the immunological implications of these conditions can help us better distinguish and manage these severe reactions.

The rash with mucosal ulceration

A rash is a disseminated eruption of cutaneous lesions with great variation in appearance, cause, and severity. When the physician is facing a rash, the history and physical examination of the patient are extremely important for the identification of the disease and its causal agent. There are various causes for a rash, which may be infectious, allergic, or rheumatologic, besides many others. Rashes associated with mucosal ulcers may have causes related to viral and bacterial infections or drug reactions. They may be associated with measles; erythema infectiosum; roseola infantum; rubella; hand, foot, and mouth disease; pityriasis rosea; dengue fever; chikungunya; zika; scarlet fever; meningococcal diseases; syphilis; and exanthematous drug eruptions.

Drug eruptions: Great imitators

Drug eruptions are among the great masqueraders that sometimes cause diagnostic challenges in clinical practice. Pharmacologic agents may induce skin changes, sharing the same pathophysiologic mechanisms of specific dermatoses, or inducing drug eruptions with different pathologic mechanisms that have similar clinical presentations. The former conditions are usually called drug-induced skin diseases, whereas the latter conditions are termed "dermatosis-like drug eruptions." Both types are great imitators in dermatologic practice and can be easily misdiagnosed as other diseases or lead to unrecognized causative agents.

The role of mixed Mycoplasma and Herpesvirus infections in case of skin lesions in children

Numerous literature data show the role of mycoplasma infection in the development of non-respiratory lesions of various organs and systems, including the skin. Herpesvirus and mycoplasma infections can trigger the development of immune-mediated inflammatory reactions of the skin and mucous membranes — erythema multiforme exudative, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, vesicular pustular dermatosis — Sneddon-Wilkinson syndrome, etc.

In order to study the frequency and nature of skin lesions with mycoplasmosis combined with herpesvirus infection, 45 patients aged 3 to 15 years of life were observed. A comprehensive clinical and laboratory study revealed skin lesions in 27 patients associated with current mycoplasma and herpesvirus infections. Thus, multiforme exudative erythema in the small form variant was diagnosed in 13 patients, skin vasculitis in 4, hemorrhagic purpura in 3, urticaria rash in 3, erythema nodosum in 2, mucositis in 2 children. In 18 children, a combined mycoplasma and herpesvirus infection was established. In 9 children, a mono infection was detected (in 5 — herpes virus and in 4 — mycoplasma).

All observed patients showed antibodies to smooth muscle antigens in titers from 1:80 to 1:160 (normal 1:40) and in the vast majority (in 24 patients) — antibodies to vascular endothelial antigens in titers from 1:80 to 1:320 (with the norm of 1:40). Compaction of the intima-media complex was detected in 6 patients with monoinfection and in 16 patients with co-infection, according to ultrasound duplex scanning of the vessels of the brachiocephalic department.

Thus, for various immuno-inflammatory, allergic skin diseases, screening for infections, in particular, mycoplasma and herpesvirus, is necessary to optimize treatment.

Drug Hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can be divided into pharmacological ADRs (type A) and hypersensitivity reactions (type B). Type B reactions can be further subdivided into immediate (<1 h, urticaria, anaphylaxis) and delayed reactions (>1 h, variable manifestation like exanthema, hepatitis, cytopenias). Prevention of hypersensitivity is often still a challenge.

METHODS

Selective literature search in Medline and Google Scholar as well as research in ADR databases like OpenVigil or SIDER.

RESULTS

Laboratory tests ([specific] IgE, lymphocyte transformation test), histological examination, dermatological tests (prick tests, epicutaneous testing) and-under certain circumstances-provocation tests can be used for diagnostics. There are only a few pharmacogenetic biomarkers to predict hypersensitivity reactions. Currently, testing for defined HLA genes is mandatory before prescription of abacavir and before the use of carbamazepine in Han Chinese or Thai patients. Immediate discontinuation of the trigger is essential in all allergic hypersensitivity reactions. Immediate reactions are treated with antihistamines, glucocorticoids and occasionally with epinephrine. Delayed reactions are usually treated with glucocorticoids.

CONCLUSION

Careful, structured diagnostics in case of suspected hypersensitivity together with adequate documentation (allergy passport) is necessary in order to avoid incidents in patients receiving subsequent treatment. Consistent use of existing resources (diagnostics and documentation) can help to avoid hypersensitivity reactions or to rapidly recognize and treat them, respectively.

A Review of the Management of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis represent a spectrum of severe cutaneous adverse reactions that carry the potential for severe, long-term adverse effects, including death. Although medications are most commonly implicated in the development of these diseases, other factors, including infection and genetics, play a role. Management is generally supportive in nature and includes maintenance of the patient's airway, breathing, and circulation. Special disease considerations include the use of skin barrier management, unique infection prevention measures, and systemic immunomodulatory therapies.

Cutaneous Adverse Effects of Diabetes Mellitus Medications and Medical Devices: A Review

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the USA. If uncontrolled, diabetes can lead to devastating complications. Diabetes medications and medical devices largely contribute to the significant financial expense that the disease inflicts on affected individuals and society. Alongside significant economic burden, there are numerous cutaneous adverse effects associated with diabetes medications and medical devices. Despite the large and increasing number of individuals living with diabetes and the wide use of the related medications and medical devices, there is limited literature that comprehensively documents their cutaneous adverse effects. These cutaneous adverse effects are significant as they can worsen glycemic control, increase disease distress, and may increase risk of associated complications. Thus, it is important that providers can recognize these cutaneous adverse effects, identify the culprit agents, and can properly manage them. In this article, we provide a critical review of the cutaneous adverse effects of medications and devices used in the management of diabetes and provide insight into risk factors and prevention and an overview of therapeutic management. An emphasis is placed on clinical recognition and treatment for use of the medical providers who, regardless of practice setting, will treat patients with diabetes.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome in two young children: the importance of an early diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a serious life-treating condition characterized by skin eruption, fever, haematologic abnormalities, and multi-organ involvement that can be fatal if unrecognized, especially in patients with liver failure. Diagnosis may be difficult because it is rarely described in children and can mimic many different conditions.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report two cases of DRESS syndrome due to prolonged antibiotic treatment in young children in whom recovery occurred following different therapeutic approaches. A previously healthy 5-year-old boy had been receiving intravenous vancomycin for right wrist and left elbow osteomyelitis and developed DRESS syndrome on day 30. The patient achieved a complete resolution of all symptoms with pulse methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone. A 4-year-old girl with cystic fibrosis, pancreatic insufficiency, chronic pulmonary colonization by Gram-positive bacteria admitted for pulmonary exacerbation was treated with intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam and tobramycin. After 14 days of treatment, she developed DRESS syndrome: antibiotic treatment was therefore stopped, and without any further therapy, a progressive resolution of the patient's clinical features was observed within 7 days, while the normalization of laboratory abnormalities was achieved at 14 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cases highlight that paediatricians should be aware of the clinical presentations of and therapeutic approaches for DRESS syndrome, especially in children receiving long-term antibiotic treatment. The removal of the offending drug is crucial and may be the only life-saving measure. In more aggressive cases, corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive drugs should be considered to achieve the best outcome.