Evaluation of Serum Posaconazole Concentrations in Patients with Hematological Malignancies Receiving Posaconazole Suspension Compared to the Delayed-Release Tablet Formulation

Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients

The prevalence of obesity has increased considerably in the last few decades. Pathophysiological changes in obese patients lead to pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) alterations that can condition the correct exposure to antimicrobials if standard dosages are used. Inadequate dosing in obese patients can lead to toxicity or therapeutic failure. In recent years, additional antimicrobial PK/PD data, extended infusion strategies, and studies in critically ill patients have made it possible to obtain data to provide a better dosage in obese patients. Despite this, it is usually difficult to find information on drug dosing in this population, which is sometimes contradictory. This is a comprehensive review of the dosing of different types of antimicrobials (antibiotics, antifungals, antivirals, and antituberculosis drugs) in obese patients, where the literature on PK and possible dosing strategies in obese adults was critically assessed.

Subtherapeutic concentrations of posaconazole tablet: determining risk factors and effectiveness of a standardized dose adjustment in hematology inpatients

Posaconazole is indicated for antifungal prophylaxis in hematology patients at high-risk of invasive fungal infections (IFI). Consensus guidelines recommend maintaining steady-state trough concentrations above 0.7 mg/L; however, upto one-third of patients return subtherapeutic concentrations which is associated with breakthrough IFI. This retrospective observational study of 496 concentrations from 90 hematology inpatients prescribed posaconazole tablet (PCZ-tab) between May 2017 and May 2019 identified 24% (n = 121) of posaconazole concentrations were subtherapeutic after the dosage of 300 mg daily. On multivariable analyses, diarrhea (p = 0.002), male gender (p = 0.018), and concurrent regular metoclopramide (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with subtherapeutic posaconazole concentrations. Eighty-nine percent of patients (n = 16) who underwent dose adjustment to 200 mg twice daily successfully achieved target posaconazole concentrations at first steady-state measurement. This study confirms that therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole remains necessary as subtherapeutic posaconazole concentrations are relatively common, and that dose adjustment of 200 mg twice daily, safely enabled achievement of therapeutic concentrations.

Current and promising pharmacotherapeutic options for candidiasis

Introduction: Candida spp. are commensal yeasts capable of causing infections such as superficial, oral, vaginal, or systemic infections. Despite medical advances, the antifungal pharmacopeia remains limited and the development of alternative strategies is needed.Areas covered: We discuss available treatments for Candida spp. infections, highlighting advantages and limitations related to pharmacokinetics, cytotoxicity, and antimicrobial resistance. Moreover, we present new perspectives to improve the activity of the available antifungals, discussing their immunomodulatory potential and advances on drug delivery carriers. New therapeutic approaches are presented including recent synthesized antifungal compounds (Enchochleated-Amphotericin B, tetrazoles, rezafungin, enfumafungin, manogepix and arylamidine); drug repurposing using a diversity of antibacterial, antiviral and non-antimicrobial drugs; combination therapies with different compounds or photodynamic therapy; and innovations based on nano-particulate delivery systems.Expert opinion: With the lack of novel drugs, the available assets must be leveraged to their best advantage through modifications that enhance delivery, efficacy, and solubility. However, these efforts are met with continuous challenges presented by microbes in their infinite plight to resist and survive therapeutic drugs. The pharmacotherapeutic options in development need to focus on new antimicrobial targets. The success of each antimicrobial agent brings strategic insights to the next phased approach in treatingCandida spp. infections.

Pharmacist review of high-risk haematology outpatients to improve appropriateness of antifungal prophylaxis

Background Patients with haematological malignancies are at high risk of invasive fungal infections. However, there is a lack of information about the utilisation of the recommended Australian antifungal prophylaxis guidelines in haematology outpatients. Objective To assess the impact of a weekly pharmacist review of high-risk adult haematology outpatients on the utilisation of appropriate antifungal prophylaxis. Setting Outpatient cancer centre, tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Method A 3-month pre-and post-interventional study was conducted. A retrospective audit was conducted to obtain baseline utilisation of antifungal guidelines in adult haematology outpatients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome receiving chemotherapy. This was followed by a weekly pharmacist review over a 3-month period of all eligible outpatients assessing the appropriateness of antifungal agent, dose, use of therapeutic drug monitoring and presence of drug-interactions/contraindications. Recommendations to physicians were conveyed weekly and outcomes recorded. Main outcome measure Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines in outpatient haematology patients before and after implementation of a 3-month weekly pharmacist review service. Results Forty patients were included in the retrospective group, equating to 348 reviews, while 42 patients equating to 269 reviews were included in the prospective group. Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines increased from 31 to 54% post implementation of a pharmacist review (Odds Ratio = 2.44, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.07-5.58, p = 0.0344). The most common reason for nonadherence to guidelines in both groups was lack of therapeutic drug monitoring and failure to prescribe antifungal prophylaxis where indicated. The percentage of appropriate use of antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia increased from 13 to 46% (p value < 0.01) after pharmacist intervention. The pharmacist made 153 recommendations from 269 reviews, with a percentage uptake of 40%. Moderate to severe drug interactions were identified in 19 reviews from 10 patients. One major azole antifungal-chemotherapy interaction was avoided. Conclusions Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines can be improved through a regular pharmacist review. Future studies should identify whether improving adherence to antifungal guidelines leads to improved patient outcomes.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Posaconazole Tablet Formulation in Chinese Participants at High Risk for Invasive Fungal Infection

INTRODUCTION

This study characterized the multidose pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of posaconazole tablets used as prophylactic antifungal therapy in Chinese patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) at risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI).

METHODS

Participants in this open-label, single-arm, phase 1b study received posaconazole 300 mg twice daily on day 1 and then once daily for up to 28 days. In the intensive PK sampling subgroup, posaconazole was administered under fasting conditions on days 1 and 8, and blood samples were regularly collected over 24 h. Trough PK sampling was conducted in all participants on days 1, 2, 3, 8, 14, 21, and 28 without regard for food intake. Population PK characteristics were predicted using PK modeling. Primary endpoints were steady-state average concentration (C_avg) and percentage of participants with steady-state C_avg (predicted and observed) > 500 ng/ml. Treatment safety and efficacy were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Sixty-five adult Chinese participants were enrolled. On day 8, steady-state arithmetic mean C_avg was 1610 ng/ml (% coefficient of variation [%CV] 42.8%) in the intensive PK subgroup (n = 20). All participants achieved a steady-state C_avg > 500 ng/ml. Predicted C_avg (pC_avg) was 1770 ng/ml (%CV 33.7%) in the total population (n = 64); 92.2% of participants had pC_avg values ≥ 500 ng/ml (n = 59). The posaconazole tablet safety profile was consistent with that of the oral formulation, and the IFI rate was 3%.

CONCLUSION

In Chinese AML patients, the posaconazole 300-mg tablet provided PK data comparable with those of previous studies and was generally well tolerated and efficacious.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02387983.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Dose Recommendations for Posaconazole in Infants and Children

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to investigate the population pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in immunocompromised children, evaluate the influence of patient characteristics on posaconazole exposure and perform simulations to recommend optimal starting doses.

Methods

Posaconazole plasma concentrations from paediatric patients undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring were extracted from a tertiary paediatric hospital database. These were merged with covariates collected from electronic sources and case-note reviews. An allometrically scaled population-pharmacokinetic model was developed to investigate the effect of tablet and suspension relative bioavailability, nonlinear bioavailability of suspension, followed by a step-wise covariate model building exercise to identify other important sources of variability.

Results

A total of 338 posaconazole plasma concentrations samples were taken from 117 children aged 5 months to 18 years. A one-compartment model was used, with tablet apparent clearance standardised to a 70-kg individual of 15 L/h. Suspension was found to have decreasing bioavailability with increasing dose; the estimated suspension dose to yield half the tablet bioavailability was 99 mg/m². Diarrhoea and proton pump inhibitors were also associated with reduced suspension bioavailability.

Conclusions

In the largest population-pharmacokinetic study to date in children, we have found similar covariate effects to those seen in adults, but low bioavailability of suspension in patients with diarrhoea or those taking concurrent proton pump inhibitors, which may in particular limit the use of posaconazole in these patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40262-018-0658-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Posaconazole Delayed Release Tablets and Suspension in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients

OBJECTIVES

Posaconazole is effective in preventing invasive fungal infections in neutropenic pediatric patients. The oral suspension has challenges in administration and absorption that are theorized to be minimized with delayed release tablets. However, this has not been validated in the pediatric population. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of posaconazole suspension and delayed release tablets in pediatric hematology/oncology patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review in pediatric hematology/oncology patients was conducted from February 2013 to February 2017. Data collected include patient demographic data; posaconazole formulation, dose, and serum concentrations; and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with 353 serum posaconazole concentrations were included; 51.6% of concentrations drawn while patients were receiving posaconazole suspension were therapeutic, whereas 62.5% of concentrations drawn while patients were receiving posaconazole delayed release tablets were therapeutic (p = 0.035). Serum concentrations drawn while taking acid suppression (histamine receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors) and posaconazole suspension were less likely to be therapeutic (p < 0.0001) compared with those taken while receiving delayed release tablets. Adverse event profiles were similar between both formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed release tablets proved more effective in achieving therapeutic serum posaconazole concentrations than posaconazole suspension, with minimal difference in adverse events, in pediatric hematology/oncology patients.

High-dose posaconazole for azole-resistant aspergillosis and other difficult-to-treat mould infections

Background

Oral follow‐up therapy is problematic in moulds with reduced azole‐susceptibility, such as azole‐resistant Aspergillus fumigatus infection. Currently, only intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L‐AmB) is advocated by guidelines for the treatment of azole‐resistant aspergillosis infections. Preclinical research indicates that high‐dose posaconazole (HD‐POS) might be a feasible option provided that high drug exposure (ie POS serum through levels >3 mg/L) can be achieved and is safe.

Objectives

To describe our experience with the use of oral HD‐POS as treatment strategies for patients infected with pathogens with a POS MIC close to the clinical breakpoint.

Patients/Methods

We review evidence supporting the use of HD‐POS and describe our experience on safety and efficacy in 16 patients. In addition, we describe the adverse events (AE) observed in 25 patients with POS concentrations at the higher end of the population distribution during treatment with the licensed dose.

Results

Sixteen patients were treated intentionally with HD‐POS for voriconazole‐resistant invasive aspergillosis (7/16), mucormycosis (4/16), salvage therapy for IA (4/16) and IA at a sanctuary site (spondylodiscitis) in 1. Grade 3‐4 AEs were observed in 6, and all of them were considered at least possibly related. Grade 3‐4 AEs were observed in 5 of the 25 patients with spontaneous high POS serum through levels considered at least possibly related using Naranjo scale.

Conclusions

High‐dose posaconazole is a treatment option if strict monitoring for both exposure and for AE is possible.

Treatment by Posaconazole Tablets, Compared to Posaconazole Suspension, Does Not Reduce Variability of Posaconazole Trough Concentrations

The delayed-release tablet formulation of posaconazole (POS-tab) results in higher plasma POS trough concentrations (C_min) than the oral suspension (POS-susp), which raises the question of the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We aimed to compare the variability of the POS C_min for the two formulations and identify determinants of the POS-tab C_min and its variability. Demographic, biological, and clinical data from 77 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients (874 C_min) treated with POS-tab (n = 41), POS-susp (n = 29), or both (n = 7) from January 2015 to December 2016 were collected retrospectively. Interpatient and within-subject coefficients of variation (CVs) of the C_min adjusted to dose (D) were calculated for each formulation. Between-group comparisons were performed using a linear mixed effects model. The POS C_min was higher for the tablet than for the suspension (median [25th-75th percentile]: 1.8 [1.2-2.4] mg/liter versus 1.2 [0.7-1.6] mg/liter, P < 0.0001). Interpatient CVs for the tablet and suspension were 60.8 versus 63.5% (P = 0.7), whereas within-subject CVs were 39.7 and 44.9%, respectively (P = 0.3). Univariate analysis showed that age and treatment by POS-tab were significantly and positively associated with the POS C_min, whereas diarrhea was associated with a diminished POS C_min Multivariate analysis identified treatment with POS-tab and diarrhea as independent factors of the POS C_min, with a trend toward a lower impact of diarrhea during treatment with POS-tab (P = 0.07). Despite increased POS exposure with the tablet formulation, the variability of the POS C_min was not significantly lower than that of the suspension. This suggests that TDM may still be useful to optimize tablet POS therapy.

Using State Transition Models to Explore How the Prevalence of Subtherapeutic Posaconazole Exposures Impacts the Clinical Utility of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Posaconazole Tablets and Oral Suspension

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been recommended in guidelines for patients receiving posaconazole oral suspension, but its utility in patients receiving posaconazole tablet, which has an improved bioavailability, remains unclear. We used state transition models with first-order Monte Carlo microsimulation to re-examine the posaconazole exposure-response relationships reported in two Phase III clinical trials (prophylaxis with posaconazole oral suspension - Models 1 & 2) and a third multicenter observational TDM study (Model 3). We simulated the impact of TDM-guided interventions to improve initial average posaconazole concentrations (C_avg) to reduce clinical failure (in Models 1 & 2) and breakthrough invasive fungal disease (bIFD) in Model 3. Simulations were then repeated using posaconazole tablet C_avg distributions in place of the oral suspension formulation. In all three models with posaconazole oral suspension, TDM interventions associated with maximal improvement in posaconazole C_avg reduced absolute rates of subtherapeutic exposures (C_avg < 700 ng/mL) by 25-49%. Predicted reductions in absolute clinical failure rates were 11% in Model 1 and 6.5% in Model 2, and a 12.6% reduction in bIFD in Model 3. With the tablet formulation, maximally-effective TDM interventions reduced subtherapeutic exposures by approximately 5% in all three models and absolute clinical failure rates by 3.9% in Model 1, and 1.6% in Model 2; and a 1.6% reduction in bIFD in Model 3. Our modeling suggests that routine TDM during prophylaxis with posaconazole tablets may have limited clinical utility unless populations with higher prevalence (>10%) of subtherapeutic exposures can be identified based on clinical risk factors.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Second-Generation Triazoles for the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis and Candidiasis

Second-generation triazoles were developed in response to the quest for more efficacious and safer therapeutic options for the treatment of severe systemic aspergillosis and candidiasis. These agents include voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, and ravuconazole. The aim of this review was to present and compare the pharmacokinetic characteristics of second-generation triazoles for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and candidiasis, emphasizing their clinical implications. The MEDLINE, Scopus, EBSCO, Google Scholar, and SCIndeks databases were searched using advanced search options, including the names of second-generation triazoles and pharmacokinetic terms as keywords. The intravenous administration of voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole results in stable pharmacokinetics of these drugs, with mostly predictable variations influenced by common and usually known factors in routine clinical settings. The high oral bioavailability of isavuconazole and, to some extent, voriconazole makes them suitable for intravenous-to-oral switch strategies. Except for intravenous voriconazole (due to the accumulation of the toxic vehicle hydroxypropyl betadex), dose reduction of second-generation triazoles is not needed in patients with renal failure; patients with hepatic insufficiency require dose reduction only in advanced disease stages. The introduction of therapeutic drug monitoring could aid attempts to optimize the blood concentrations of triazoles and other drugs that are known to or that possibly interact, thus increasing treatment efficacy and safety. There is a need for new studies that are designed to provide useful data on second-generation triazole pharmacokinetics, particularly in special circumstances such as central nervous system and ocular infections, infections in newborns and infants, and in subjects with genetic polymorphisms of metabolizing enzymes.

Clinical Outcomes of Oral Suspension versus Delayed-Release Tablet Formulations of Posaconazole for Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections

Posaconazole is used for prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections (IFIs) among patients with hematologic malignancies. We compared the incidence of breakthrough IFIs and early discontinuation between patients receiving delayed-release tablet and oral suspension formulations of posaconazole.

Posaconazole is used for prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections (IFIs) among patients with hematologic malignancies. We compared the incidence of breakthrough IFIs and early discontinuation between patients receiving delayed-release tablet and oral suspension formulations of posaconazole. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving posaconazole between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2016. We defined probable or proven breakthrough IFIs using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. Overall, 547 patients received 860 courses of posaconazole (53% received the oral suspension and 48% received the tablet); primary indications for prophylaxis were acute myeloid leukemia (69%), graft-versus-host disease (18%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (3%). There were no significant differences in demographics or indications between patients receiving the different formulations. The incidence and incidence rate of probable or proven IFIs were 1.6% and 3.2 per 10,000 posaconazole days, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of IFIs between suspension courses (2.8 per 10,000 posaconazole days) and tablet courses (3.7 per 10,000 posaconazole days) (rate ratio = 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3 to 2.3). Of the 14 proven or probable cases of IFI, 8/14 had posaconazole serum concentrations measured, and the concentrations in 7/8 were above 0.7 μg/ml. Posaconazole was discontinued early in 15.5% of courses; however, the frequency of discontinuation was also not significantly different between the tablet (16.5%) and oral suspension (14.6%) formulations (95% CI for difference = −0.13 to 0.06). In conclusion, the incidence of breakthrough IFIs was low among patients receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and not significantly different between patients receiving the tablet formulation and those receiving the oral suspension formulation.

Antifungal Prophylaxis with Posaconazole Delayed-Release Tablet and Oral Suspension in a Real-Life Setting: Plasma Levels, Efficacy, and Tolerability

We continuously determined posaconazole plasma concentrations (PPCs) in 61 patients with hematological malignancies receiving posaconazole (PCZ) delayed-release tablets (DRT; 48 patients; median duration of intake, 92 days) and PCZ oral solution (OS; 13 patients; median duration of intake, 124 days). PCZ DRT and OS antifungal prophylaxis was efficient and well tolerated. Thirty-four of 48 patients (71%) receiving DRT always had PPCs of >0.7 mg/liter, while 14 of 48 patients (29%) had at least one PPC of ≤0.7 mg/liter. In patients receiving OS, 4 of 13 patients (31%) always had PPCs of >0.7 mg/liter, 6 of 13 patients (46%) had at least one PPC of ≤0.7 mg/liter, and 3 (23%) patients never reached a PPC of 0.7 mg/liter. In patients with at least one determined PPC, the mean proportion of all PPCs of >0.7 mg/liter was 91% for PCZ DRT, whereas it was 52% for PCZ OS (P = 0.001). In the per sample analysis, PPCs were significantly more likely to be >0.7 mg/liter in patients receiving DRT than in patients receiving OS (PPCs were >0.7 mg/liter in 91.4% [297/325] of patients receiving DRT versus 70.3% [85/121] of patients receiving OS; P < 0.001). Patients receiving PCZ DRT had higher proportions of PPCs of >0.7 mg/liter than patients receiving OS both in the per patient and in the per sample analyses. Two patients (3%) had side effects during PCZ prophylaxis, and one (2%) had fungal breakthrough infection. Therapeutic drug monitoring enables detection of extended periods of PPCs of ≤0.7 mg/liter (e.g., due to nonadherence or graft-versus-host disease), which may also be associated with the loss of protective intracellular PCZ concentrations, regardless of the PCZ formulation.

Prevention of Invasive Aspergillus Fungal Infections with the Suspension and Delayed-Release Tablet Formulations of Posaconazole in Patients with Haematologic Malignancies

Posaconazole is a triazole antifungal used to prevent invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients receiving chemotherapy or haemotopoietic stem cell transplantation. Due to highly variable bioavailability of the oral suspension formulation, a delayed-release tablet was developed which showed improved bioavailability. A minimal target posaconazole plasma concentration of 0.7 mg/L is recommended for prophylaxis of IFIs. However, the relationship between plasma concentration of posaconazole and its efficacy against IFIs remains unclear. We analysed trough posaconazole concentrations and response against IFIs in 50 and 104 patients with haematologic malignancies receiving prophylactic posaconazole as the tablet or suspension formulation, respectively. Mean plasma concentration of posaconazole was 1.91 ± 1.06 mg/L and 0.82 ± 0.57 mg/L in the tablet and the oral suspension group, respectively (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients reaching the minimal target concentration of 0.7 mg/L was 92.0% and 47.1% in the tablet and oral suspension groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Emergent aspergillosis occurred in 9 (8.7%) patients in the suspension group and in none of the patients taking the tablet formulation (p = 0.032). Our results show a relationship between plasma concentrations of posaconazole and its prophylactic efficacy in patients with haematologic malignancies. Target posaconazole concentrations are reached more efficiently with the tablet than with the suspension formulation.