Delayed Intraventricular Hemorrhage following a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement: Exploring the Surgical Anatomy of a Rare Complication

Risk factors for delayed intracranial hemorrhage secondary to ventriculoperitoneal shunt: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH), a potential complication of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts, has been associated with high mortality, but its risk factors are still unclear.

AIM

To investigate the risk factors of DICH after VP shunts.

METHODS

We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of DICH and non-DICH adult patients with VP shunts between January 2016 and December 2020.

RESULTS

The 159 adult VP shunt patients were divided into 2 groups according to the development of DICH: the DICH group (n = 26) and the non-DICH group (n = 133). No statistically significant difference was found in age, sex, laboratory examination characteristics or preoperative modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between the DICH and non-DICH groups (P > 0.05); however, a history of an external ventricular drain (EVD) [P = 0.045; odds ratio (OR): 2.814; 95%CI: 1.024-7.730] and postoperative brain edema around the catheter (P < 0.01; OR: 8.397; 95%CI: 3.043-23.171) were associated with a high risk of DICH. A comparison of preoperative mRS scores between the DICH group and the non-DICH group showed no significant difference (P = 0.553), while a significant difference was found in the postoperative mRS scores at the 3-mo follow-up visit (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

A history of EVD and postoperative brain edema around the catheter are independent risk factors for DICH in VP shunt patients. DICH patients with a high mRS score are vulnerable to poor clinical outcomes.

A new inflammatory parameter can predict delayed intracranial hemorrhage following ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Delayed intracerebral hemorrhage (DICH) secondary to ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt is considered to be a potentially severe event. This study aimed to investigate the association between a ratio of postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLRR) and DICH secondary to VP shunt. We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent VP shunt between January 2016 and June 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association of DICH and NLRR. Then patients were divided into two groups according to the optimal cut-off point of NLRR, propensity score matching (PSM) method was performed to reconfirm the result. A total of 130 patients were enrolled and DICH occurred in 29 patients. Elevated NLRR and history of craniotomy were independent risk factors for DICH secondary to VP shunt. The optimal cut off point of NLRR was 2.05, and the sensitivity was 89.7%, the specificity was 63.4%. Patients with NLRR > 2.05 had much higher incidence of DICH (40.6% vs 4.5%). Our finding suggested that DICH following VP shunt was not a rare complication and elevated NLRR could independently predict DICH. Inflammatory responses might play an important role in the development of DICH following VP shunt.

High-Resolution MRI for Evaluation of Ventriculostomy Tubes: Assessment of Positioning and Proximal Patency

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Imaging evaluation of ventriculostomy tubes, despite the frequency of malfunction, has remained inadequate due to the absence of a systematic way of assessing the catheter itself. In this retrospective review, we assessed the utility of high-resolution 3D MR imaging techniques, including CISS and volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequences, in the evaluation of ventriculostomy catheters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 23 clinical MR imaging cases of shunted hydrocephalus spanning a 3-year period, all depicting ventriculostomy catheters. The MR imaging examinations included isotropic CISS and volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequences performed with and without contrast. These were independently evaluated by 2 neuroradiologists with respect to the catheter course, side hole position, relationship of the side holes to the ventricles, patency, and the presence or absence of intraluminal debris.

RESULTS

The catheter tip was best seen on isotropic CISS sequences reformatted in an oblique plane, and side holes were visualized as CSF signal defects along the catheter wall in 10/23 (43%) cases. The relationship of the catheter side holes to the ventricles was seen in 47% of cases and was best visualized on the coronal CISS sequences. Catheter patency was confirmed in 12/23 (52%) cases, while the other 48% were notable for T2 hypointense filling defects compatible with luminal obstruction. Enhancement of some of these filling defects on imaging is suggestive of choroid plexus ingrowth rather than debris.

CONCLUSIONS

High-resolution 3D MR imaging using isotropic CISS sequences allows systematic evaluation of catheter positioning, patency, and potential etiologic differentiation of filling defects when shunt dysfunction is suspected.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography Versus Fluoroscopy for Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement

OBJECTIVE

Catheter malposition represents one of the major causes of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt dysfunction. The usefulness of intraoperative fluoroscopy using skull landmarks has already been proved to decrease catheter malposition and surgical revision rates. After introducing intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) in our department, our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of this imaging modality to decrease cranial catheter misplacement compared with intraoperative fluoroscopy.

METHODS

In our retrospective analysis of 152 patients, catheter placement was evaluated by iCT (n = 48) and biplane fluoroscopy (n = 57). A control group (n = 47) had no intraoperative imaging. Outcome measures included accuracy of ventricular catheter position, revision surgeries, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Ventricular catheter placement was accurate in 24/48 patients with iCT and 45/57 patients with fluoroscopy (P = 0.002) versus 23/47 patients in the control group. Sensitivity and positive predictive value for estimating optimal catheter position with iCT were 100% and 54%. The specificity and negative predictive value were 50% and 100%. After intraoperative revision, 4 catheters remained malpositioned in the iCT group, whereas the fluoroscopy group had none (P = 0.03); 2 of these 4 catheters were revised postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroscopy may be the method of choice to intraoperatively assess ventricular catheter positioning. In our experience, iCT shows a tendency to be more time consuming and, in the beginning, was not associated with a steeper learning curve. Another consideration was the significant higher radiation exposure per patient. iCT did not improve the accuracy of catheter placement and did not decrease early revisions for VP placement patients.