Trabecular Bone Score Reflects Trabecular Microarchitecture Deterioration and Fragility Fracture in Female Adult Patients Receiving Glucocorticoid Therapy: A Pre-Post Controlled Study

Trabecular bone score (TBS) in Cushing's disease: TBS gain after hypercortisolism normalization

CONTEXT

Hypercortisolism frequently induces trabecular bone loss, more pronounced at the lumbar spine, resulting in osteoporosis, and thus an increase in fracture risk. Several studies have shown bone mass recovery in patients with Cushing's disease (CD) after treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To examine treatment effects on TBS (trabecular bone score) in addition to aBMD (areal bone mineral density) in a cohort of patients with CD.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Single-center retrospective longitudinal study in patients diagnosed with CD and successfully treated following surgery and/or medical treatment.

PATIENTS

We included 31 patients with median age and BMI (body mass index) of 37.7 [28.4;43.3] years old and 27.7 [25.8;30.4] kg/m2, respectively. Median 24 h urinary cortisol before treatment was 213.4 [168.5;478.5] μg/24 h. All subjects were completely biochemically controlled or cured after treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

aBMD and TBS were evaluated at AP Spine (L1-L4) with DXA prodigy (GE-Lunar), QDR 4500 (Hologic), and TBS iNsight® (Med-Imaps) before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Absolute TBS and aBMD gains following cure of CD were significant (p < 0.0001, and p < 0.001, respectively). aBMD and TBS increased by +3.9 and 8.2 % respectively after cure of CD. aBMD and TBS were not correlated before (p = 0.43) and after treatment (p = 0.53). Linear regression analyses showed that TBS gain was independent of baseline BMI and that low TBS at baseline was predictive of TBS gain after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The more significant improvement of microarchitecture assessed by TBS than aBMD and the absence of correlation between TBS and aBMD suggest that TBS may be an adequate marker of bone restoration after cure of CD. To support this conclusion, future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods should be carried out.

The impact of glucocorticoids on bone health and growth: endocrine and non-endocrine effects in children and young patients

Glucocorticoids have numerous applications in short and/or long-term therapy both in pediatric and young adults, based on their significant anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Different routes of administration can be provided including topical, inhalatory and oral. Topical treatments are the first choice for many dermatologic conditions. The inhalatory form is widely used in asthma management while systemic pathologies often require oral administration. The risks for adverse effects are related to the dose and duration of therapy as well as the specific agent used. Therefore, long-term treatment has a negative impact on different metabolic systems and can lead to hypertension, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. In particular, many studies emphasize the direct and indirect effects of glucocorticoids on bone health. Glucocorticoids are the most common iatrogenic cause of osteoporosis and can alter bone development in young adults. These side effects are due to an early and transient increase in bone resorption and a decrease in bone formation. Glucocorticoid-induced changes can act on the bone multicellular unit, bone cells and intracellular signaling pathways. Chronic use can also modify bone mass though indirect endocrine and non-endocrine effects by reducing the anabolic function of sex steroids and GH/IGF-1 axis, interfere with calcium metabolism, as well as muscle atrophy and central fat accumulation. The aim of our review was to revise the available evidence on the impact of glucocorticoid treatment on bone health related to endocrine and non-endocrine effects in Young patients.

Bone safety of dual-release hydrocortisone in patients with autoimmune primary adrenal insufficiency

Background

Conventional glucocorticoids (C-GC) replacement regimens have a detrimental effect on skeletal health in patients with adrenal insufficiency (AI), ultimately leading to an increased fracture risk. The novel dual-release hydrocortisone (DR-HC) formulations are characterized by a more favourable safety profile on various clinical endpoints. Data comparing the impact of C-GC and DR-HC on bone, however, are scarce.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with autoimmune primary AI (PAI; 13 treated with C-GC and 14 treated with DR-HC) were evaluated to compare bone-related parameters between the two treatment groups.

Results

No significant differences between the two treatments groups were observed with respect to bone turnover markers. Patients treated with C-GC showed a lower bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (LS; 0.791 ± 0.195 vs. 0.942 ± 0.124 g/cm2, p=0.025) and at femoral neck (FN; 0.633 ± 0.114 vs. 0.716 ± 0.088 g/cm2, p=0.045). Moreover, they were characterized by a lower trabecular bone score (TBS; 1.236 ± 0.035 vs. 1.383 ± 0.030, p=0.004) and by a higher mean number of vertebral fractures per patient (0.75 vs. 0 fractures, p=0.002). TBS was the best predictor of fracture risk, with a pseudo-R2 of 0.593; moreover, at mediation analysis, it was able to fully explain the observed detrimental effect of C-GC, compared to DR-HC, on fracture risk.

Conclusions

These results suggest that DR-HC is associated with less bone-related complications compared to C-GC in patients with PAI. Moreover, TBS seems to play a pivotal role in the mediation of the relationship between glucocorticoid treatment regimens and fracture risk.

Update on the clinical use of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the management of osteoporosis: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) under the auspices of WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging

PURPOSE

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a grey-level textural measurement acquired from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry lumbar spine images and is a validated index of bone microarchitecture. In 2015, a Working Group of the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) published a review of the TBS literature, concluding that TBS predicts hip and major osteoporotic fracture, at least partly independent of bone mineral density (BMD) and clinical risk factors. It was also concluded that TBS is potentially amenable to change as a result of pharmacological therapy. Further evidence on the utility of TBS has since accumulated in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and the introduction of FRAX and BMD T-score adjustment for TBS has accelerated adoption. This position paper therefore presents a review of the updated scientific literature and provides expert consensus statements and corresponding operational guidelines for the use of TBS.

METHODS

An Expert Working Group was convened by the ESCEO and a systematic review of the evidence undertaken, with defined search strategies for four key topics with respect to the potential use of TBS: (1) fracture prediction in men and women; (2) initiating and monitoring treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis; (3) fracture prediction in secondary osteoporosis; and (4) treatment monitoring in secondary osteoporosis. Statements to guide the clinical use of TBS were derived from the review and graded by consensus using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

A total of 96 articles were reviewed and included data on the use of TBS for fracture prediction in men and women, from over 20 countries. The updated evidence shows that TBS enhances fracture risk prediction in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and can, when taken with BMD and clinical risk factors, inform treatment initiation and the choice of antiosteoporosis treatment. Evidence also indicates that TBS provides useful adjunctive information in monitoring treatment with long-term denosumab and anabolic agents. All expert consensus statements were voted as strongly recommended.

CONCLUSION

The addition of TBS assessment to FRAX and/or BMD enhances fracture risk prediction in primary and secondary osteoporosis, adding useful information for treatment decision-making and monitoring. The expert consensus statements provided in this paper can be used to guide the integration of TBS in clinical practice for the assessment and management of osteoporosis. An example of an operational approach is provided in the appendix. This position paper presents an up-to-date review of the evidence base, synthesised through expert consensus statements, which informs the implementation of Trabecular Bone Score in clinical practice.

Update on trabecular bone score

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is an indirect and noninvasive measure of bone quality. A low TBS indicates degraded bone microarchitecture, predicts osteoporotic fracture, and is partially independent of clinical risk factors and bone mineral density (BMD). There is substantial evidence supporting the use of TBS to assess vertebral, hip, and major osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal women, as well as to assess hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk in men aged > 50 years. TBS complements BMD information and can be used to adjust the FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment) score to improve risk stratification. While TBS should not be used to monitor antiresorptive therapy, it may be potentially useful for monitoring anabolic therapy. There is also a growing body of evidence indicating that TBS is particularly useful as an adjunct to BMD for fracture risk assessment in conditions associated with increased fracture risk, such as type-2 diabetes, chronic corticosteroid excess, and other conditions wherein BMD readings are often misleading. The interference of abdominal soft tissue thickness (STT) on TBS should also be considered when interpreting these findings because image noise can impact TBS evaluation. A new TBS software version based on an algorithm that accounts for STT rather than BMI seems to correct this technical limitation and is under development. In this paper, we review the current state of TBS, its technical aspects, and its evolving role in the assessment and management of several clinical conditions.

Yak (Bos grunniens) milk improves bone mass and microarchitecture in mice with osteoporosis

The effect of milk on bone health is controversial. In this study, the effects of yak milk in mice with retinoic acid-induced osteoporosis (OP) were evaluated. Yak milk was provided to OP mice as a nutrition supplement for 6 wk. The results showed that yak milk significantly reduced bone turnover markers (tartrate acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase). The yak milk treatment was also associated with remarkably increased bone mineral density, bone volume, trabecular thickness, and trabecular number, as well as improved biomechanical properties (maximum load and stress) of the tibia. Furthermore, yak milk mitigated the deterioration of the network and thickness of trabecular bone in treated OP mice compared with the OP model group. The results indicated that yak milk could improve bone mass and microarchitecture through the inhibition of bone resorption in OP mice.

Meta-analyses of the quantitative computed tomography data in dialysis patients show differential impacts of renal failure on the trabecular and cortical bones

Dialysis patients have compromised bone health that increases their fracture risk due to low bone mass and deterioration in bone microarchitecture. Through meta-analyses of published studies, we conclude that dialysis patients suffer from impaired compartmental bone parameters compared with healthy controls.

INTRODUCTION

We performed meta-analyses to determine the effect of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients under dialysis on the trabecular and cortical parameters of radius and tibia.

METHODS

This is a meta-analysis of cross-sectional and prospective clinical studies. PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched using various permutation combinations. Dialysis patients were compared with non-CKD healthy controls using quantitative computed tomography. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and pQCT data of dialysis patients were dissected from eligible studies for pooled analysis of each parameter.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria that included data from 457 dialysis patients and 2134 controls. Pooled analysis showed a significant decrease (a) in total vBMD at distal radius [standard deviation of the mean (SDM) = -0.842, p = 0.000] and tibia (SMD = -0.705, p = 0.000) and (b) in cortical vBMD (SDM = -1.037, p = 0.000) at radius of dialysis patients compared with control. There were strong correlations between total vBMD and microarchitecture parameters at tibia in dialysis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

At radius and tibia, bone mass, microarchitecture, and geometry at trabecular and cortical envelopes displayed impairments in dialysis patients compared with control. Tibial vBMD may have diagnostic value in dialysis. HR-pQCT and pQCT may be used to further understand the compartmental bones response to CKD-induced loss at different stages of CKD.

The Bone Strain Index: An Innovative Dual X-ray Absorptiometry Bone Strength Index and Its Helpfulness in Clinical Medicine

Bone strain Index (BSI) is an innovative index of bone strength that provides information about skeletal resistance to loads not considered by existing indexes (Bone Mineral Density, BMD. Trabecular Bone Score, TBS. Hip Structural Analysis, HSA. Hip Axis Length, HAL), and, thus, improves the predictability of fragility fractures in osteoporotic patients. This improved predictability of fracture facilitates the possibility of timely intervention with appropriate therapies to reduce the risk of fracture. The development of the index was the result of combining clinical, radiographical and construction-engineering skills. In fact, from a physical point of view, primary and secondary osteoporosis, leading to bone fracture, are determined by an impairment of the physical properties of bone strength: density, internal structure, deformation and fatigue. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for assessing bone properties, and it allows measurement of the BMD, which is reduced mainly in primary osteoporosis, the structural texture TBS, which can be particularly degraded in secondary osteoporosis, and the bone geometry (HSA, HAL). The authors recently conceived and developed a new bone deformation index named Bone Strain Index (BSI) that assesses the resistance of bone to loads. If the skeletal structure is equated to engineering construction, these three indexes are all considered to determine the load resistance of the construct. In particular, BSI allows clinicians to detect critical information that BMD and TBS cannot explain, and this information is essential for an accurate definition of a patient’s fracture risk. The literature demonstrates that both lumbar and femoral BSI discriminate fractured osteoporotic people, that they predict the first fragility fracture, and further fragility fractures, monitor anabolic treatment efficacy and detect patients affected by secondary osteoporosis. BSI is a new diagnostic tool that offers a unique perspective to clinical medicine to identify patients affected by primary and, specially, secondary osteoporosis. This literature review illustrates BSI’s state of the art and its ratio in clinical medicine.

Trabecular Bone Score in Rheumatic Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with rheumatic disease are at high risk of low bone mass and osteoporotic fracture. Trabecular bone score (TBS), derived from lumbar spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is a novel measure of bone texture that independently predicts fracture risk. This review examines the role of TBS in rheumatic disease including fracture prediction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most studies concerning TBS and rheumatic disease are cross-sectional, with consistent evidence of lower TBS in patients with rheumatic disease compared to controls. Recent studies have shown association and predictive ability of TBS for prevalent fracture, and the few longitudinal studies showed predictive ability of TBS for incident fracture. TBS in ankylosing spondylitis is of interest given the high rates of vertebral fracture and technical difficulty with lumbar spine bone mineral density. TBS degradation has been associated with disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis, systemic sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Glucocorticoid exposure is associated with lower TBS, and predicts prevalent fracture, in patients with rheumatic conditions.

Therapy With Intravenous Methylprednisolone Pulses Is Associated With Loss of Bone Microarchitecture in Trabecular Bone Score -Assessment Among Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Graves' Orbitopathy: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Therapy with intravenous glucocorticoids (GCs) is associated with various side effects, however, the impact on bone remains elusive. Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a diagnostic tool providing information on bone microarchitecture based on images obtained from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. We investigated the influence of the intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulse administration on TBS in patients with moderate-to-severe Graves' orbitopathy (GO).

METHODS

Fifteen patients with GO were treated with 12 IVMP pulses (6x0.5g, 6x0.25 g on a weekly schedule). They received supplementation with 2000 IU of vitamin D and 1.0 g of calcium throughout the study period. TBS was assessed at baseline and after last IVMP pulse. To determine the difference between values at baseline and after treatment the least significant change (LSC) methodology was used. We compared pre- and posttreatment mean TBS values.

RESULTS

We found a significant decrease of TBS in 5 out of 15 (33%) patients. Mean TBS value decreased becoming 2.4% lower than at baseline (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

IVMP pulse therapy exerts negative effect on bone microarchitecture in TBS assessment. The analysis of the clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and the evaluation of bone mineral density and TBS should be considered before initiating IVMP therapy.

Lower trabecular bone score is associated with an increased incidence of localized femoral periosteal thickening

INTRODUCTION

Femoral localized periosteal thickening (LPT, also termed "beaking") of the lateral cortex often precedes an atypical femoral fracture (AFF). Bisphosphonate (BP) use, glucocorticoid use, and Asian race are major risk factors for developing such fractures. The aim of this study was to determine whether the trabecular bone score (TBS) reflecting the lumbar trabecular microarchitecture was related to LPT in glucocorticoid-treated Japanese patients with autoimmune diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 111 women with autoimmune diseases treated with prednisolone (PSL) who had undergone both femoral X-ray and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the L1 - L4 lumbar vertebrae and for whom TBS could be evaluated for two or more of these.

RESULTS

Femoral LPT was evident in the X-rays of 18 of 111 patients (16.2%). Higher body mass index (BMI), longer duration of PSL use and longer duration of BP use were significant in patients with LPT compared to those without. The TBS was significantly lower in patients with LPT than in those without (1.314 ± 0.092 vs. 1.365 ± 0.100, p = 0.044); however, the lumbar bone mineral density did not differ significantly (0.892 ± 0.141 vs. 0.897 ± 0.154 g/cm², p = 0.897). TBS was significantly associated with LPT (odds ratio, 0.004; 95% CI, 0 - 0.96; p = 0.048), but not in the multivariate analysis including BMI, duration of PSL use and duration of BP use.

CONCLUSIONS

The TBS was lower in glucocorticoid-treated Japanese women with autoimmune diseases with LPT than in those without LPT, and deteriorated trabecular microarchitecture influenced by longer use of BP and glucocorticoid might be associated with the development of LPT.

Influence of glucocorticoid treatment on trabecular bone score and bone remodeling regulators in early rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Glucocorticoids (GC) modulate several regulators involved in the pathogenesis of bone changes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Trabecular bone score (TBS) allows the indirect assessment of bone quality. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of GC on TBS and serum levels of bone turnover regulators in patients with recent-onset RA.

Materials and methods

Forty-seven subjects with recent-onset RA (< 6 months) were classified in two groups, low (lGC) and high (hGC) glucocorticoids, according to glucocorticoid dose regimens. Bone mineral density (BMD), TBS, and circulating Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1), sclerostin, osteoprotegerin (OPG), and RANK-L were evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months.

Results

BMD significantly declined after 12 months with no significant difference between the lGC and hGC group, whereas TBS decreased in the hGC group only. Circulating OPG decreased during the follow-up period, the reduction being significantly greater in hGC group; conversely, sclerostin and RANK-L serum increased, in a significantly greater extent in the hGC group. TBS inversely correlated with sclerostin, RANK-L, and Dkk1 circulating levels whereas directly correlated with OPG circulating levels. GC cumulative dose showed an inverse relationship with BMD in both the hGC and lGC groups; TBS values showed an inverse relationship with GC cumulative dose in the hGC group only. GC cumulative dose was associated to higher sclerostin and lower OPG serum levels. TBS did not correlate with disease activity whereas BMD was inversely related to disease activity.

Conclusions

In early RA, GC exposure contributes to the reduction of BMD and affects bone quality depending on dose regimens. TBS could be a useful tool to evaluate the negative effect of GC on bone microarchitecture.

Trial registration

This study was ancillary to a parallel-group observational prospective study which was approved by the medical local ethics committee (protocol number DDG 334/19-06-2019).

Bone remodeling stages under physiological conditions and glucocorticoid in excess: Focus on cellular and molecular mechanisms

This review provides a rationale for the cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling stages under physiological conditions and glucocorticoids (GCs) in excess. Remodeling is a synchronous process involving bone resorption and formation, proceeding through stages of: (1) resting bone, (2) activation, (3) bone resorption, (4) reversal, (5) formation, (6) termination. Bone remodeling is strictly controlled by local and systemic regulatory signaling molecules. This review presents current data on the interaction of osteoclasts, osteoblasts and osteocytes in bone remodeling and defines the role of osteoprogenitor cells located above the resorption area in the form of canopies and populating resorption cavities. The signaling pathways of proliferation, differentiation, viability, and cell death during remodeling are presented. The study of signaling pathways is critical to understanding bone remodeling under normal and pathological conditions. The main signaling pathways that control bone resorption and formation are RANK / RANKL / OPG; M-CSF – c-FMS; canonical and non-canonical signaling pathways Wnt; Notch; MARK; TGFβ / SMAD; ephrinB1/ephrinB2 – EphB4, TNFα – TNFβ, and Bim – Bax/Bak. Cytokines, growth factors, prostaglandins, parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, calcitonin, and estrogens also act as regulators of bone remodeling. The role of non-encoding microRNAs and long RNAs in the process of bone cell differentiation has been established. MicroRNAs affect many target genes, have both a repressive effect on bone formation and activate osteoblast differentiation in different ways. Excess of glucocorticoids negatively affects all stages of bone remodeling, disrupts molecular signaling, induces apoptosis of osteocytes and osteoblasts in different ways, and increases the life cycle of osteoclasts. Glucocorticoids disrupt the reversal stage, which is critical for the subsequent stages of remodeling. Negative effects of GCs on signaling molecules of the canonical Wingless (WNT)/β-catenin pathway and other signaling pathways impair osteoblastogenesis. Under the influence of excess glucocorticoids biosynthesis of biologically active growth factors is reduced, which leads to a decrease in the expression by osteoblasts of molecules that form the osteoid. Glucocorticoids stimulate the expression of mineralization inhibitor proteins, osteoid mineralization is delayed, which is accompanied by increased local matrix demineralization. Although many signaling pathways involved in bone resorption and formation have been discovered and described, the temporal and spatial mechanisms of their sequential turn-on and turn-off in cell proliferation and differentiation require additional research.

Glucocorticoids and Trabecular Bone Score

TBS (Trabecular Bone Score) is the latest tool for clinicians to evaluate bone micro-architecture based on a pixel greyscale, which is provided by lumbar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Its use enhances fracture prediction in addition to DXA-BMD (Bone Mineral Density). This is independent of fracture risk assessment (FRAX) and DXA results. We present a narrative review regarding the connection between TBS and Glucocorticoids (GC), either as a drug used for different conditions or as a tumor-produced endogenous excess.

TBS is a better discriminator for GC-induced vertebral fractures compared to DXA-BMD. This aspect is similarly available for patients with osteoporosis diagnosed by DXA. TBS is inversely correlated with the cumulative dose of GC (systemic or inhaled), with disease duration, and positively correlated with respiratory function in patients with asthma. Low TBS values are found in females with a T-score at the hip within the osteoporosis range, with diabetes mellitus, or who use GC. Lumbar TBS is a screening tool in menopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. TBS is an independent parameter that provides information regarding skeleton deterioration in diabetic patients receiving GC therapy in a manner complementary to DXA-BMD. TBS might become an essential step regarding the adrenalectomy decision in patients with adrenal incidentaloma in whom autonomous cortisol secretion might damage bone micro-architecture. TBS currently represents a standard tool of fracture risk evaluation in patients receiving GC therapy or with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome, a tool easy to be applied by different practitioners since GCs are largely used

Beyond Bone Mineral Density: A New Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Index of Bone Strength to Predict Fragility Fractures, the Bone Strain Index

For a proper assessment of osteoporotic fragility fracture prediction, all aspects regarding bone mineral density, bone texture, geometry and information about strength are necessary, particularly in endocrinological and rheumatological diseases, where bone quality impairment is relevant. Data regarding bone quantity (density) and, partially, bone quality (structure and geometry) are obtained by the gold standard method of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data about bone strength are not yet readily available. To evaluate bone resistance to strain, a new DXA-derived index based on the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a greyscale of density distribution measured on spine and femoral scan, namely Bone Strain Index (BSI), has recently been developed. Bone Strain Index includes local information on density distribution, bone geometry and loadings and it differs from bone mineral density (BMD) and other variables of bone quality like trabecular bone score (TBS), which are all based on the quantification of bone mass and distribution averaged over the scanned region. This state of the art review illustrates the methodology of BSI calculation, the findings of its in reproducibility and the preliminary data about its capability to predict fragility fracture and to monitor the follow up of the pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis.

Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: The Potential Role of Romosozumab

Glucocorticoid (GC)-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is a major problem in patients with rheumatic diseases. The deleterious effect of GC on bone turnover is rapid and dose-dependent, with a predilection on the trabecular bone, resulting in vertebral fractures. Early recognition and prompt treatment of GIOP helps prevent bone loss and reduce fractures. There are pitfalls in current assessment tools for GIOP by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) estimation formula. In this review, we evaluate different assessment methods for GIOP and summarize current therapies of GIOP, including the antiresorptive and anabolic agents. The potential role of newer anti-osteoporosis agent romosozumab, an anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibody, is also discussed.

Trabecular bone score improves fracture risk assessment in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the clinical utility of trabecular bone score (TBS) evaluation for fracture risk assessment in glucocorticoid (GC)-treated patients compared with BMD assessment.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-seven patients on GC treatment were included [mean age 62 (18) years, 63% women] in this cross-sectional study. The medical history, anthropometric data, lumbar and femoral BMD (DXA) [considering osteoporosis (OP): T-score ⩽-2.5], TBS (considering degraded microarchitecture: <1.230) and dorsolumbar X-ray [to assess vertebral fractures (VF)] were evaluated. BMD and TBS sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were evaluated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods.

RESULTS

All patients were receiving GC treatment for autoimmune diseases during 47.7 (68.9) months at a mean daily dose of 14.5 mg; 17% had VF, 28% any type of fragility fracture (VF + non-VF), 29% OP and 52% degraded microarchitecture. Degraded microarchitecture was significantly more frequent than densitometric OP in patients with VF (76% vs 38%) and with any fragility fracture (69% vs 36%). For VF, TBS and BMD sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.76, 0.53, 0.25 and 0.92, and 0.38, 0.72, 0.22 and 0.85, respectively. Specificity increased to 0.89 for VF and 0.9 for any fragility fracture on combining BMD+TBS. TBS had better ability than BMD to discriminate between patients with fracture, especially VF (area under the curve = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

TBS seems to have greater discriminative power than BMD for fracture risk assessment in GC-treated patients, confirming the utility of this method as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of GC-induced OP.

Vertebral fracture risk in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: the role of hypogonadism and corticosteroid boluses

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with fragility fracture (FF) development in glucocorticoid (GC)-treated patients.

METHODS

127 patients (aged 62±18 years, 63% women) on GC-treatment (mean dose 14.5±14.1 mg/day and duration 47.7±69 months) were included. The clinical data collected included bone metabolism study (including gonadal axis), GC-treatment, disease activity, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis (evaluating densitometric osteoporosis (OP) and trabecular bone score (TBS) degraded microarchitecture values (DMA)), X-ray (assessing vertebral fractures (VF)), FRAX risk (GC-adjusted) and previous FF.

RESULTS

17% of the patients had VF, 28% FF (VF and/or non-VF), 29% OP and 52% DMA. Patients with VF received more GC boluses (57.1% vs 29.5%, p=0.03), were older (68±13 vs 60±19 years, p=0.02), postmenopausal (100% vs 67%, p=0.02), had low testosterone levels (57% vs 11%, p=0.02), lower TBS values (1.119±0.03 vs 1.237±0.013, p<0.001) and higher FRAX risk (17.2±16 vs 9.3±7.6, p=0.003). Patients with FF showed higher accumulated GC doses (16.6±18.4 vs 11.1±12.9 g, p=0.046). On multivariate analysis, hypogonadism (OR 12.38; 95% CI 1.85 to >100, p=0.01) and having received GC boluses (OR 3.45; 95% CI 1.04 to 12.15, p=0.01) were the main factors related to VF. Hypogonadism (OR 7.03; 95% CI 1.47 to 38.37, p=0.01) and FRAX >20 (OR 7.08; 95% CI 1.28 to 53.71, p=0.02) were factors related to FF.

CONCLUSION

Hypogonadism is the principal risk factor for developing fractures in GC-treated men and women, whereas receiving GC boluses is a major factor for VF. These results indicate the importance of evaluating the gonadal axis in these patients.

Relationship between Skeletal Muscle Mass, Bone Mineral Density, and Trabecular Bone Score in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study was performed.

PURPOSE

We investigated the relationships between skeletal muscle mass, bone mineral density (BMD), and trabecular bone score (TBS) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs).

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

The TBS has attracted attention as a measurement of trabecular bone microarchitecture. It is derived from data obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and is a reported indicator of VCFs, and its addition to the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool increases the accuracy of fracture prediction.

METHODS

BMD, skeletal muscle mass, and TBS were measured in 142 patients who visited Shimoshizu National Hospital from April to August 2019. Patients were divided into a VCF group and a non-VCF group. Whole-body DXA scans were performed to analyze body composition, including appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (SMI; lean mass [kg]/height [m2]) and BMD. The diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia was an appendicular SMI <5.46 kg/m2. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors for VCFs.

RESULTS

The significant (p<0.05) findings (VCF group vs. non-VCF group, respectively) included age (79 vs. 70 years), femoral BMD (0.50 vs. 0.58 g/cm2), TBS (1.25 vs. 1.29), and lower limb muscle mass (8.6 vs. 9.9 kg). The VCF group was significantly older and had a lower femur BMD and decreased leg muscle mass than the non-VCF group. Based on the multiple logistic regression analysis, lower femoral BMD and decreased leg muscle mass were identified as risk factors for vertebral fracture independent of age, but the TBS was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with VCFs had low BMD, a low TBS, and low skeletal muscle mass. Lower femoral BMD and decreased leg muscle mass were identified as risk factors for VCFs independent of age, whereas the TBS was not identified as a risk factor for VCFs.

Trabecular Bone Score Is a Useful Parameter for the Prediction of Vertebral Fractures in Patients With Polymyalgia Rheumatica

INTRODUCTION

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), a benign rheumatic disorder, requires long-term glucocorticoid therapy, which could be associated with osteoporosis. In the present study, we compared bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS) and frequencies of vertebral fracture (VF) among patients with PMR or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and controls.

METHODS

Fifty-three postmenopausal women with PMR aged 50 yr or older were eligible for inclusion in this study. Subjects in RA (n = 106) and control (n = 106) groups were selected by propensity score matching with controlling age, body mass index and use of anti-osteoporotic agents.

RESULTS

The frequency of VF in patients with PMR (30.2%) was significantly higher than those in patients with RA (13.2 %) and controls (13.2%, p = 0.017). The mean TBS of patients with PMR (1.317 ± 0.092) was significantly lower than those of patients with RA (1.336 ± 0.089) and the controls (1.373 ± 0.073, p < 0.001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis for VF in patients with PMR, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.759 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.601-0.918, p < 0.001) for TBS and 0.618 (95% CI = 0.442-0.795, p < 0.001) for L-spine BMD. The AUCs were 0.760 (95% CI = 0.630-0.891, p ≤ 0.001) and 0.767 (95% CI 0.627-0.907, p < 0.001) for femur neck and total hip BMD, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the factor associated with VF of patients with PMR as a lower TBS (Odds ratio: 0.000, 95% CI: 0.000, 0.754, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

TBS could be a supplementary tool for discriminating osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal patients with PMR.

New Developments in Fracture Risk Assessment for Current Osteoporosis Reports

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Identifying individuals at high fracture risk can be used to target those likely to derive the greatest benefit from treatment. This narrative review examines recent developments in using specific risk factors used to assess fracture risk, with a focus on publications in the last 3 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is expanding evidence for the recognition of individual clinical risk factors and clinical use of composite scores in the general population. Unfortunately, enthusiasm is dampened by three pragmatic randomized trials that raise questions about the effectiveness of widespread population screening using clinical fracture prediction tools given suboptimal participation and adherence. There have been refinements in risk assessment in special populations: men, patients with diabetes, and secondary causes of osteoporosis. New evidence supports the value of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), high resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT), opportunistic screening using CT, skeletal strength assessment with finite element analysis (FEA), and trabecular bone score (TBS). The last 3 years have seen important developments in the area of fracture risk assessment, both in the research setting and translation to clinical practice. The next challenge will be incorporating these advances into routine work flows that can improve the identification of high risk individuals at the population level and meaningfully impact the ongoing crisis in osteoporosis management.

Degraded microarchitecture by low trabecular bone score is associated with prevalent vertebral fractures in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE

Recently, trabecular bone score (TBS) has emerged as an important supplementary assessment tool in osteoporosis diagnosis and management. The high incidence of fragility fracture within the non-osteoporotic range of bone mineral density (BMD), among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, highlights the crucial role of bone microarchitecture in osteoporosis. This study aimed to evaluate whether TBS identified existing vertebral fractures (VF) more accurately than BMD in SLE patients.

METHODS

This study enrolled 147 SLE patients from the Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) cohort, who had BMD and TBS assessed from January 2018 until December 2018. Twenty-eight patients sustaining VF and risk factors associated with increased fracture occurrence were evaluated. Independent risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of VF were analyzed by logistic regression and ROC curve, respectively.

RESULT

The prevalence of vertebral fracture among SLE patients was 19%. BMD, T-score, TBS, and TBS T-score were significantly lower in the vertebral fracture group. TBS exhibited higher positive predictive value and negative predictive value than L spine and left femur BMD for vertebral fractures. Moreover, TBS had a higher diagnostic accuracy than densitometric measurements (area under curve, 0.811 vs. 0.737 and 0.605).

CONCLUSION

Degraded microarchitecture by TBS was associated with prevalent vertebral fractures in SLE patients. Our result suggests that TBS can be a complementary tool for assessing vertebral fracture prevalence in this population.

Addressing bone quality and bone density after renal transplantation: A prospective evaluation of the evolution of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density over the first 5 years following renal transplantation in Asian patients

The evolution of trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone mineral density (BMD) over the first 5 years after renal transplantation was prospectively evaluated in 164 patients. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months. Cumulative steroid dose, serum 25(OH)D, calcium, parathyroid hormone, and total ALP levels at these time points were checked. Incident fractures were identified from X-rays/vertebral fracture assessments. Mean (SD) age, TBS, and lumbar spine BMD at baseline were 47.11 (9.53), 1.424 (0.097), and 0.935 (0.183) gm/cm² , respectively. Baseline TBS was lower in tertiary 1.38 (0.07) vs secondary hyperparathyroidism 1.43 (0.01) vs post-parathyroidectomy 1.46 (0.11); P = .035. Trabecular bone score and BMD significantly decreased from baseline->6 months, changes after that at consecutive time points were non-significant. 11% had incident fractures during the follow-up period, majority being metatarsal with no vertebral or hip fractures noted. This first prospective evaluation of TBS and BMD evolution at multiple time points over 5 years suggest that microarchitectural and bone density deteriorations post-renal transplantation stabilize after 6 months. Stabilization of these parameters could partially account for the absence of major fractures noted in this Asian population. Possible genetic and ethnic differences in fracture risk between Asian and Caucasian renal transplant patients have to be explored through large population-based studies.

Commonality in the microarchitecture of trabecular bone: A preliminary study

Understanding the relationship between the microstructure and mechanical function of trabecular bone is critical for prediction and prevention of bone fragility fractures. However, a detailed understanding of the structural design of trabecular microarchitecture is still missing. This study hypothesized that there exists a commonality in the underlying probabilistic distributions of microstructural features of trabecular bones, whereas the microstructural differences among individuals are primarily describe by a set of scalar parameters. To test the hypothesis, twenty-three trabecular bone specimens were obtained from two anatomic locations (i.e., femoral neck and vertebral body) and a diverse group of seventeen donors of different age and sex. The number, size, spatial location, and orientation of individual plates and rods in the trabecular bone specimens were determined via volumetric decomposition of 3D μCT images using the Individual Trabecula Segmentation (ITS) technique. Then, m/n bootstrap Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were performed to compare the normalized distributions of size, orientation, and spatial arrangement of trabecular plates and rods in the specimens. The results showed that 100% of the twenty-three normalized distributions of each microstructural feature were statistically equivalent irrespective of individual differences among the bone specimens, except the distributions of rod spatial arrangement (<100%). On the other hand, nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests showed that a set of scalar parameters (i.e., the number, average size, and average nearest neighbor distance of trabecular plates and rods) were statistically different among the individual specimens (p<0.05). Due to the commonality of the underlying distributions, the individual differences in the trabecular microstructure among the specimens seemed to be reflected primarily by changes in the scalar parameters. The above results strongly support the hypothesis of this study and may shed more light on understanding the natural design of trabecular bone microstructures.

Usefulness of the Trabecular Bone Score for assessing the risk of osteoporotic fracture

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The trabecular bone score (TBS) is an imaging technique that assesses the condition of the trabecular microarchitecture. Preliminary results suggest that TBS, along with the bone mineral density assessment, could improve the calculation of the osteoporotic fracture risk. The aim of this study was to analyse TBS values and their relationship with the clinical characteristics, bone mineral density and history of fractures of a cohort of posmenopausal women.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analysed 2,257 posmenopausal women from the FRODOS cohort, which was created to determine the risk factors for osteoporotic fracture through a clinical survey and bone densitometry with vertebral morphometry. TBS was applied to the densitometry images. TBS values ≤1230 were considered indicative of degraded microarchitecture. We performed a simple and multiple linear regression to determine the factors associated with this index.

RESULTS

The mean TBS value in L1-L4 was 1.203±0.121. Some 55.3% of the women showed values indicating degraded microarchitecture. In the multiple linear regression analysis, the factors associated with low TBS values were age, weight, height, spinal T-score, glucocorticoid treatment, presence of type 2 diabetes and a history of fractures due to frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

TBS showed microarchitecture degradation values in the participants of the FRODOS cohort and was associated with anthropometric factors, low bone mineral density values, the presence of fractures, a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus and the use of glucocorticoids.

The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

There is an increasing body of evidence that the trabecular bone score (TBS), a surrogate of bone microarchitecture extracted from spine DXA, could play an important role in the management of patients with osteoporosis or at risk of fracture. The current paper reviews this published body of scientific literature on TBS and answers the most relevant clinical questions.

RECENT FINDINGS

TBS has repeatedly been proven to be predictive of fragility fractures, current and future, and this is largely independent of BMD, CRF, and the FRAX, and when used in conjunction with any one of these measures, it consistently enhances their accuracy. There also is a growing body of evidence indicating that the TBS has particular advantages over BMD for specific causes of increased fracture risk, like chronic corticosteroid excess, type-2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, and patients being treated with anti-aromatase and primary hyperparathyroidism, conditions wherein BMD readings are often misleading. TBS enhances performance of the FRAX tool, where its greatest utility appears to lie in its ability to accurately classify those patients whose BMD level lies close to the intervention threshold, aiding in decisions on whether treatment is warranted or not. Furthermore, TBS has also particular advantages over BMD in secondary osteoporosis. While the role of TBS with monitoring could be important as the different molecules impact logically TBS to various degrees, large clinical trials are still needed.