Switch of Intravitreal Therapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion from Anti-VEGF to Dexamethasone Implant and Vice Versa

Branch retinal vein occlusion treated with anti-VEGF: to switch or not to switch?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate visual outcomes after switching from bevacizumab to ranibizumab or aflibercept in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

DESIGN

A retrospective, multi-center, observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients diagnosed with BRVO and were treated with at least 3 bevacizumab injections, before anti VEGF switch.

METHODS

The follow-up period was 36 months, and the primary study outcomes assessed changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after anti VEGF switch.

RESULTS

A total of 263 eyes of 263 patients with a mean age of 71.5 ± 11.2 years of which 50% were of male gender met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 175 eyes did not undergo switch, whereas 88 eyes underwent anti-VEGF switch. There was not a significant difference in mean age (p = 0.634) and gender (p = 0.269) between the groups. Baseline BCVA of the no-switch group was 0.47 ± 0.43 logMAR (20/59 Snellen) versus 0.6 ± 0.49 logMAR (20/79 Snellen) (p = 0.031) in the switch group, and at 36-months it was 0.41 ± 0.39 (20/51 Snellen) logMAR versus 0.54 ± 0.49 logMAR (20/69 Snellen) (p = 0.035), respectively. The difference between the rate of change in BCVA per year was insignificant between groups (p = 0.414). In multivariate analysis, baseline BCVA was the single significant predictor for switch (beta 0.137, p = 0.035). Patients with more than one anti-VEGF switch suffer from decrease in BCVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Worse baseline BCVA is a significant predictor for anti-VEGF switch execution, though the switch has no significant impact on the change in BCVA over time. Multiple anti-VEGF switch is not recommended.

Intravitreal Injection of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Combined with Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and corticosteroid combination therapy for the management of treatment-naïve or recurrent/refractory macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in comparison with anti-VEGF monotherapy.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, the data from publications in the electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI and Scopus from January 1, 2007, through November 20, 2020, were compiled. Heterogeneity was statistically quantified by the I2 statistic, and meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-four related studies were identified, including a total of 1280 eyes, which consisted of 685 and 507 patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), respectively. This study demonstrated a greater improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the combination group compared to anti-VEGF monotherapy for both CRVO and BRVO cases at 6 months after initiating therapy. The improvement in vision was more notable in BRVO cases than in CRVO cases. However, the changes in central macular thickness (CMT) did not differ significantly between the different treatment approaches, and the results were inconclusive. Including all cases with RVO, there was no inferiority in terms of BCVA improvement and CMT reduction in the triamcinolone subgroup compared with the slow-release dexamethasone implant subgroup. A greater improvement was noticed in terms of BCVA in the sequentially treated subgroup compared to the simultaneous treatment subgroup, while there was a greater reduction in CMT in the simultaneous subgroup with the highest reduction recorded at 1 month after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that combination therapy with intravitreal anti-VEGF and corticosteroid (such as intravitreal or subtenon triamcinolone or dexamethasone implant) has a slightly better effect on improving BCVA in cases with BRVO or CRVO at 6 months compared to monotherapy.

Effect of Alternate Treatment with Intravitreal Corticosteroid and Anti-VEGF for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose

To evaluate whether treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections alternately can improve treatment outcomes of macular edema (ME) caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods

This dual-center retrospective study included 112 eyes with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO that were alternately treated with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections (33 eyes, alternate group) or treated only with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (79 eyes, anti-VEGF group) on a pro re nata basis.

Results

During the 12-month follow-up period, the alternate group achieved a visual acuity gain of 0.39 logMAR, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a gain of 0.21 logMAR (P=0.042). The alternate group demonstrated a reduction in the central macular thickness of 229.9-μm, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a reduction of 220.1 μm (P=0.887). The alternate group required an average of 5.2 injections, while the anti-VEGF received 4.2 injections (P < 0.001). In a propensity score-matched cohort to compensate for the differences in the injection numbers between the two groups, the alternate group achieved a better visual acuity gain than the anti-VEGF group at month 12 (0.39 logMAR vs. 0.17 logMAR, P=0.048).

Conclusions

In ME secondary to RVO, treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections alternately resulted in a more favorable visual outcome compared with intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy.

The correlation between cytokine levels in the aqueous humor and the prognostic value of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for treating macular edema resulting from retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To determine the correlation between aqueous humor cytokine levels and the prognostic value of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for treating macular edema resulting from retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME).

METHODS

This prospective study included 47 RVO-ME and 32 senile cataract cases. Aqueous humor collection was performed in patients with RVO-ME before intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and in patients before cataract surgery. VEGF, monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6, basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels were measured in the aqueous humor. Central retinal thickness (CRT) was measured before ranibizumab treatment and during each follow-up visit. The recovery rate following ranibizumab treatment was calculated as (CRT_BT-CRT_AT1W)/CRT_BT, in which CRT_BT was the CRT measured before treatment and CRT_AT1W was measured 1 week after treatment. The recurrence time of RVO-ME was recorded.

RESULTS

VEGF, MCP-1, IL-8, and IL-6 levels in the aqueous humor of patients with RVO-ME were significantly higher compared with control and were positively correlated with the CRT_BT. Ranibizumab significantly reduced CRT, and VEGF levels positively correlated with the recovery rate. The mean recurrence time of RVO-ME was 43.5 days. IL-6 levels negatively correlated with the recurrence time of ME.

CONCLUSION

VEGF, MCP-1, IL-8, and IL-6 levels were significantly increased in patients with RVO-ME and were positively correlated with ME. Higher VEGF levels were indicative of CRT recovery, and higher IL-6 levels were indicative of ME recurrence after ranibizumab treatment.

Real-life medium term follow-up data for intravitreal dexamethasone implant in retinal vein occlusion

Macular edema (ME) is the most frequent vision threatening consequence after retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In this study, we evaluate the effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implants (DII, Ozurdex) in a real-life cohort of 99 patients with ME due to RVO. All patients who received DII for ME following RVO between 2011 and 2016 at the University Eye Hospital Freiburg, Germany and who had fully accessible electronic medical records were eligible for this study. Most of the patients included in this study were not treatment-naïve: 61 eyes had received prior anti-VEGF drugs, 6 eyes had received intravitreal corticosteroids (triamcinolone) and 15 had been treated with both; 17 eyes were treatment-naïve. Mean follow-up was 312 ± 310 days. Mean visual acuity (VA) was maintained throughout the observation period (mean VA at baseline: 66.7 ± 23.5 letters; at last observation 64.9 ± 28.3). Central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 526 ± 179 µm at baseline to 431 ± 199 µm. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) increased from 14.4 ± 3.1 mmHg at baseline to 17.1 ± 6.3 mmHg. Cataract surgery was performed in 22% of phakic eyes. DII was used as second-line treatment in the majority of cases in this cohort. The fact that mean VA remained unchanged while mean CRT decreased illustrates that morphologic improvement does not always translate into functional gain. Mean IOP was maintained within normal limits and cataract formation was as expected in this age group.

Aqueous humor inflammatory cytokine levels and choroidal thickness in patients with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the association between subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) and the level of aqueous humor (AH) inflammatory cytokines in patients with macular edema (ME) associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

Twenty-eight eyes of 28 BRVO ME patients who underwent intravitreal injection treatment (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or dexamethasone implant) were prospectively recruited. The concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and inflammatory cytokines were measured from AH samples. We analyzed clinical factors associated with visual gain or the degree of central macular thickness (CMT) decrease and the association between SCT and inflammatory cytokine levels.

RESULTS

On multiple linear regression analysis, the AH interleukin (IL)-8 level was significantly associated with visual gain and CMT reduction at 6 months. Age, systemic hypertension, and AH monocyte chemo-attractant protein 1 level showed a significant association with baseline SCT, and VEGF-A showed a significant association with baseline SCT ratio (BRVO eye SCT/fellow eye SCT). Those with thick SCT showed a higher level of AH soluble VEGF receptors 2 and IL-8 and showed better visual gain and greater CMT reduction at 2 and 6 months compared to the thin SCT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of AH inflammatory cytokines was significantly associated with the ischemic status of the retina, treatment outcomes, and SCT in BRVO ME patients. Thick baseline SCT might be a predictive sign for better treatment outcomes in BRVO ME patients which are thought to be related to a higher level of intraocular inflammatory cytokines in these patients.

Simultaneous intravitreal dexamethasone and aflibercept for refractory macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To assess the functional and anatomical outcomes of concurrent administration of aflibercept injection and dexamethasone (DEX) implant in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), refractory to each of the two drugs previously administered as monotherapy. Secondary outcomes included the number of retreatments required in a 12-month follow-up and safety.

METHODS

This is a prospective, interventional case series of consecutive patients with refractory ME secondary to RVO, followed over a year. One injection of aflibercept was followed by a DEX implant on the same day; retreatment was driven by the persistence of ME on SD-OCT at least 4 months after the previous combined therapy. Central retinal thickness (CRT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were collected at 1 month and then every 2 months until the end of follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty eyes of 30 Caucasian patients were enrolled; mean duration of RVO before the first combined treatment was 25 ± 5 months (range 11 ± 30). Baseline BCVA was 0.73 ± 0.5 LogMAR, with no significant changes at 12 months (0.77 ± 0.51 μm, p = 0.2). Baseline CRT was 578.3 ± 161 μm, reducing to 352.5 ± 81 μm at 12 months (p = 0.003). Thirteen eyes (43.3%) required a second treatment. Twenty eyes (66.6%) showed no ME at the end of follow-up. One patient (3.3%) required topical IOP-lowering therapy during the study.

CONCLUSION

In eyes with ME secondary to RVO unresponsive to either aflibercept or DEX administered singularly, a combination therapy with simultaneous administration of aflibercept and DEX was effective in resolving ME, despite the absence of visual improvement. Earlier combined treatment in the course of the disease might lead to better functional outcomes.