Chromatographic Characterization and Method Development for Determination of Levetiracetam in Saliva: Application to Correlation with Plasma Levels

Monitoring levetiracetam concentration in saliva during pregnancy is stable and feasible

AIMS

This multicenter prospective cohort study (registration no. ChiCTR2000032089) aimed to investigate the relationship between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations to determine whether saliva could be used for routine monitoring of levetiracetam during pregnancy.

METHODS

The slot concentrations of levetiracetam in simultaneously obtained saliva and plasma samples were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. The correlations between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations and the dose-normalized concentrations were compared among pregnant women in different stages and nonpregnant control participants with epilepsy.

RESULTS

In total, 231 patients with 407 plasma and saliva sample pairs were enrolled from 39 centers. Linear relationships between salivary and plasma levetiracetam concentrations were reported in the enrolled population (r = 0.898, p < 0.001), including pregnant (r = 0.935, p < 0.001) and nonpregnant participants (r = 0.882, p < 0.001). Plasma concentrations were moderately higher than saliva concentrations, with ratios of saliva to plasma concentrations of 0.98 for nonpregnant women, 0.98, 1, and 1.12 for pregnant women during the first trimester, the second trimester, the and third trimester, respectively. The effective range of saliva levetiracetam concentration was found to be 9.98 μg/mL (lower limit) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence intervals, 0.915-0.959), sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 86.8%, and p < 0.001, to 24.05 μg/mL (upper limit) with an AUC of 0.952 (0.914-0.99), sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.3%, and p = 0.007.

CONCLUSION

The saliva/plasma concentration ratio of levetiracetam remains constant during pregnancy and is similar to that in non-pregnant individuals. Monitoring levetiracetam concentration in saliva during pregnancy should be widely promoted.

Quantitation of levetiracetam concentrations in plasma and saliva samples by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Application to therapeutic drug monitoring for pregnant women with epilepsy

Although levetiracetam (LEV) has favorable linear pharmacokinetic properties, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is necessary for pregnant women with epilepsy. This study aims to build a simple, reliable, and sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for determining LEV concentrations in plasma and saliva samples, to support the routine TDM of LEV in Chinese pregnant women with epilepsy. The stable isotope-labeled LEV-d6 was used as the internal standard. The extracted samples were analyzed using a UPLC-MS/MS system with positive electrospray ionization. Mobile phase A was water containing 5 mM ammonium acetate and 0.1% formic acid, and phase B was 1:1 methanol-acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. The method was validated and utilized to determine LEV concentrations in non-pregnant and pregnant patients with epilepsy. The developed method was validated in both plasma and saliva samples over a concentration range of 0.1-50 μg/mL. The intra- and inter-batch accuracy for LEV ranged from -7.0% to 2.9%, with precisions between 2.7% and 9.3%. In pregnant patients, the mean dose-standardized LEV trough plasma concentrations were significantly lower than those in non-pregnant patients (4.73 ± 2.99 vs. 7.74 ± 3.59 ng/mL per mg/day; P < 0.0001). It is recommended that the TDM of LEV should be routinely performed during the different stages of pregnancy.

Salivary Biomarkers of Anti-Epileptic Drugs: A Narrative Review

Saliva is a biofluid that reflects general health and that can be collected in order to evaluate and determine various pathologies and treatments. Biomarker analysis through saliva sampling is an emerging method of accurately screening and diagnosing diseases. Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are prescribed generally in seizure treatment. The dose-response relationship of AEDs is influenced by numerous factors and varies from patient to patient, hence the need for the careful supervision of drug intake. The therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of AEDs was traditionally performed through repeated blood withdrawals. Saliva sampling in order to determine and monitor AEDs is a novel, fast, low-cost and non-invasive approach. This narrative review focuses on the characteristics of various AEDs and the possibility of determining active plasma concentrations from saliva samples. Additionally, this study aims to highlight the significant correlations between AED blood, urine and oral fluid levels and the applicability of saliva TDM for AEDs. The study also focuses on emphasizing the applicability of saliva sampling for epileptic patients.

Quantification of levetiracetam in plasma and urine and its application to a pharmacokinetic study of traumatic brain injury patients

Background: Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic drug used to prevent or treat seizure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. This study aimed to develop and validate methodology suitable for measuring levetiracetam concentrations in human plasma and urine. Methods: Plasma or urine (10 μl) samples were spiked with [²H₆]-levetiracetam and processed using an acetonitrile precipitation. ESI-LC-MS/MS was employed for analyte detection. Results: The levetiracetam calibration was linear from 0.1 to 50 mg/l in a combined matrix of plasma and urine. Intra- and inter-assay imprecision and accuracy in plasma were <7.7 and 109%, and in urine were <7.9 and 108%, respectively. Conclusion: The validated method was applied to a pharmacokinetic study of levetiracetam in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Qualitative and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry in Salivary Metabolomics and Proteomics

The metabolomics and proteomics analysis of saliva, an excellent biofluid that is a rich source of biological compounds, allows for the safe and frequent screening of drugs, their metabolites, and molecular biomarkers of various diseases. One of the most frequently used analytical methods in saliva analysis is liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and tandem mass spectrometry. The low ionisation efficiency of some compounds and a complex matrix makes their identification by MS difficult. Furthermore, quantitative analysis by LC-MS frequently cannot be performed without isotopically labelled standards, which usually have to be specially synthesised. This review presented reports on qualitative and quantitative approaches in salivary metabolomics and proteomics. The purpose of this manuscript was to present the challenges, advances, and future prospects of mass spectrometry, both in the analysis of salivary metabolites and proteins. The presented review should appeal to those interested in the recent advances and trends in qualitative and quantitative mass spectrometry in salivary metabolomics and proteomics, which may facilitate a diagnostic accuracy, the evaluation of treatment efficacy, the early diagnosis of disease, and a forensic investigation of some unapproved drugs for any medical or dietary administration.

Feasibility of Using Oral Fluid for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AED) using blood is well established but limited by its invasiveness, accessibility, cost, interpretation errors, and related disturbances in protein binding. TDM using oral fluid (OF) could overcome these limitations. This paper provides a summary of the current evidence for using OF as a matrix to perform TDM of AEDs, as well as practical considerations. A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted on April 9, 2018 (and then updated on May 20, 2020) using all AEDs as keywords along with "oral fluid," "saliva," "salivary," "seizure," "epilepsy," "antiepileptic," and "anticonvulsant." A total of 18 relevant articles were found and included in this review. There is evidence to suggest that AED TDM using OF is feasible and that reference ranges can be calculated for the following drugs: carbamazepine, ethosuximide, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, topiramate, and valproic acid. For all other AEDs, there is either a lack of evidence on the feasibility of TDM using OF or the evidence indicates that TDM using OF is not feasible. Practical considerations should include the timing and method of OF collection (stimulated or unstimulated) due to their probable impact on the reliability of AED TDM. Using OF may improve the acceptability and accessibility and reduce the cost of AED TDM. Clinical implementation requires standardized collection protocols, more rigorously defined OF reference ranges, and further studies to determine the relevance to clinically important outcomes.

HPLC method for the determination of antiepileptic drugs in human saliva and its application in therapeutic drug monitoring

Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent neurological disorders, affecting approximately 1% of the world population. Despite the availability of dozens of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in clinical practice, the number of patients who do not respond to treatment and/or exhibit high pharmacokinetic variability remains significant, highlighting the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Plasma and serum are the main biological matrices applied for the TDM of AEDs, but the necessity of a specialized professional has been an obstacle to sample collection in ambulatory. Thus, drug quantification in saliva arises as a promising alternative. Herein, a novel highperformance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) technique with diode-array detection (DAD) was developed and fully validated, in order to simultaneously quantify carbamazepine, carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, S-licarbazepine, lacosamide and levetiracetam in human saliva. The technique was linear in the following concentration ranges: 0.2-6 mg L^-1 for carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide; 0.3-9 mg L^-1 for S- licarbazepine; 1-30 mg L^-1 for lacosamide; and 0.8-24 mg L^-1 for levetiracetam. The lower limits of the established calibration ranges are below therapeutic margins, attesting a sensitive drug quantification. Accuracy values ranged from -14.76 to 9.35 % and -12.87 and 11.18 % in intra-day and inter-day analysis, respectively. Intra-day values of precision varied between 3.45-10.76% and inter-day values ranged from 3.85 to 13.05 %. This method was subsequently applied to saliva samples of epileptic patients admitted to the Refractory Epilepsy Centre of Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC EPE, Coimbra). The results of saliva samples were correlated with drug concentrations in plasma from the same patients. Statistically significant correlations were observed (p < 0.05) for carbamazepine (r² = 0.6887; r = 0.8299), carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (r² = 0.8633; r = 0.9291), S-licarbazepine (r² = 0.5266; r = 0.7257) and levetiracetam (r² = 0.7103; r = 0.8428). Our data support that this method can be used in TDM of AEDs using human saliva samples, constituting a new approach to establish individual therapeutic ranges and assess patient's adherence to treatment.

Highly sensitive UHPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of two synergistically acting antiepileptic drugs; levetiracetam and lacosamide: Application to pharmaceutical tablets and human urine

A simple and highly sensitive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatographic-diode array (UHPLC-DAD) detection method was developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of levetiracetam (LEV) and lacosamide (LAC). It was clinically proven that the combination of LEV and LAC exhibits a synergistic effect against refractory seizures in mice, which was the motivation for the analysis of this binary mixture both in bulk and in human urine samples. The binary mixture was resolved on a Hypersil BDS C₁₈ analytical column, utilizing a mobile phase of 0.050 mol L^-1 phosphate buffer (pH 5.60), methanol and acetonitrile in the ratio (80:10:10 v/v/v) using catechol as an internal standard. The mobile phase was pumped at a flow rate of 1.2 mL min^-1 with diode array detection at 205 nm for both drugs and 270 nm for IS. Calibration curves were linear with correlation coefficient >0.9990 over the studied concentration range of 0.1-70.0 μg mL^-1 for both drugs. The developed method was reproducible with low relative standard deviation values for intra- and inter-day precision (<2.0%). Both drugs were determined in bulk, pharmaceutical formulations and human urine samples without any interference from complex matrices.