Pilot Analysis of Late Conversion to Belatacept in Kidney Transplant Recipients for Biopsy-Proven Chronic Tacrolimus Toxicity

Costimulatory Blockade and Solid Organ Transplantation: The Past, Present, and Future

Belatacept is the first costimulatory blockade agent clinically approved for transplant immunosuppression. Although more than 10 years of study have demonstrated that belatacept offers superior long-term renal allograft and patient survival compared to conventional calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression regimens, the clinical adoption of belatacept has continued to lag because of concerns of an early risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and various logistical barriers to its administration. In this review, the history of the clinical development of belatacept is examined, along with the findings of the seminal BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials culminating in the clinical approval of belatacept. Recent efforts to incorporate belatacept into novel CNI-free immunosuppression regimens are reviewed, as well as the experience of the Emory Transplant Center in using a tapered course of low-dose tacrolimus in belatacept-treated renal allograft patients to garner the long-term outcome benefits of belatacept without the short-term increased risks of ACR. Potential avenues to increase the clinical adoption of belatacept in the future are explored, including surmounting the logistical barriers of belatacept administration through subcutaneous administration or more infrequent belatacept dosing. In addition, belatacept conversion strategies and potential expanded clinical indications of belatacept are discussed for pediatric transplant recipients, extrarenal transplant recipients, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and in patients with failed renal allografts. Finally, we discuss the novel immunosuppressive drugs currently in the development pipeline that may aid in the expansion of costimulation blockade utilization.

Cardiovascular Risk Following Conversion to Belatacept From a Calcineurin Inhibitor in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Rationale & Objective

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), a belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen is associated with beneficial effects on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors compared with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimens. Our objective was to compare the calculated CV risk between belatacept and CNI (predominantly tacrolimus) treatments using a validated model developed for KTRs.

Study Design

Prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, international multicenter trial.

Setting & Participants

KTRs aged 18-80 years with a stable graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate > 20 mL/min/1.73 m²), 3-60 months after transplantation, treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine A, were eligible for inclusion.

Intervention

Continuation with a CNI-based regimen or switch to belatacept for 12 months.

Outcomes

Comparison of the change in the estimated 7-year risk of major adverse CV events and all-cause mortality, changes in traditional markers of CV health, as well as measures of arterial stiffness.

Results

Among the 105 KTRs randomized, we found no differences between the treatment groups in the predicted risk for major adverse CV events or mortality. Diastolic blood pressure, measured both centrally by using a SphygmoCor device and peripherally, was lower after the belatacept treatment than after the CNI treatment. The mean changes in traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, including kidney transplant function, were otherwise similar in both the treatment groups. The belatacept group had 4 acute rejection episodes; 2 were severe rejections, of which 1 led to graft loss.

Limitations

The heterogeneous baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and time from transplantation to trial enrollment in the participants. A limited study duration of 1 year.

Conclusions

We found no effects on the calculated CV risk by switching to the belatacept treatment. Participants in the belatacept group had not only lower central and peripheral diastolic blood pressure but also a higher rejection rate.

Funding

The trial has received a financial grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Trial Registration

EudraCT no. 2013-001178-20.

Belatacept rescue therapy of CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, meta-analysis

There is growing evidence about the potential favorable effects that can be obtained from converting the administration of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to Belatacept in kidney transplantation recipients. We conducted a meta-analysis to formulate strong evidence from the current literature about this effect on kidney functions, as measured by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Our search was conducted on the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, the clinical trials, and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number registries to obtain all studies that investigated the effect of post-transplantation CNIs conversion to Belatacept on kidney functions. Thirteen studies were finally included in the current study. The results showed a significant improvement in the eGFR following the conversion as compared to its value prior to it (MD = 10.41; 95% CI = 6.93, 13.90; P-value < 0.001). Although, there was no risk of bias among the pooled studies (P-value = 0.391), there was a significant heterogenity (I 2 = 80%; P value < 0.001). Serum creatinine levels showed no significant change following the conversion as compared to its value prior to it (MD = -1.22; 95% CI = -2.61, 0.16; P-value = 0.083). Nevertheless, a significant heterogeneity among the included studies was observed (I 2 = 87%; P-value = 0.005). Belatacept can be a good alternative to the CNI-based regimens following the kidney transplantation. The conversion to Belatacept resulted in an improvement in eGFR.

Belatacept in renal transplantation in comparison to tacrolimus and molecular understanding of resistance pattern: Meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The T-cell costimulation blocking agent belatacept has been identified as a possible substitute for calcineurin inhibitors, however, no consensus has been established against its use over the standard care agent Tacrolimus.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of belatacept based maintenance immuno-suppressive regimens in comparison to tacrolimus in renal transplantion.

METHODS

We did extensive search of all the available literature comparing the role of belatacept to tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients by searching the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Crossref, Scopus, clinical trials registry on October 5, 2020.

RESULTS

The literature search identified four randomized controlled trials (n = 173 participants) comparing belatacept with tacrolimus. There was no significant difference in estimated renal function at 12 mo [mean difference 4.12 mL/min/1.73 m², confidence interval (CI): -2.18 to 10.42, P = 0.20]. Further, belatacept group was associated with significant increase in biopsy proven acute rejection [relative risk (RR) = 3.27, CI: 0.88 to 12.11, P = 0.08] and worse 12 mo allograft survival (RR = 4.51, CI: 1.23 to 16.58, P = 0.02). However, incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus was lower with belatacept at 12 mo (RR = 0.26, CI: 0.07 to 0.99, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The evidence reviewed in this meta-analysis suggested that belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression regimens were associated with an increased risk allograft loss in renal transplant recipients with equivalent renal functioning against standard tacrolimus; however, observed significantly reduced new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation incidence and lower serum low density lipid profile levels in belatacept group. In addition, the adaptation of belatacept in renal transplantation has been forestalled by increased rates of rejection and resistance owing to development of various effector memory T cells through, parallel differentiation and immunological plasticity.

A Case of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia under Belatacept and Everolimus: Benefit-Risk Balance between Renal Allograft Function and Infection

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia is an opportunistic disease usually prevented by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. A 49-year-old HLA-sensitized male with successful late conversion from tacrolimus-based to belatacept-based immunosuppression developed P. jirovecii pneumonia for which he presented several risks factors: low lymphocyte count with no CD4+ T cells detected since 2 years, hypogammaglobulinemia, history of acute cellular rejection 3 years before, and immunosuppressive treatment (belatacept, everolimus). Because of respiratory gravity in the acute phase, the patient was given oxygen, corticosteroids, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Thanks to the improvement of respiratory status, and because of the renal impairment, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was converted to atovaquone for 21 days. Indeed, after 1 week on intensive treatment, the benefit-risk balance favored preserving renal function according to respiratory improvement status. P. jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis for the next 6 months was monthly aerosol of pentamidine. Long-term safety studies or early/late conversion to belatacept did not report on P. jirovecii pneumonia. Four other cases of P. jirovecii pneumonia under belatacept therapy were previously described in patients having no P. jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis. Studies on the reintroduction of P. jiroveciipneumonia prophylaxis after conversion to belatacept would be of interest. It could be useful to continue regular evaluation within the second-year post-transplantation regarding immunosuppression: T-cell subsets and immunoglobulin G levels.

Opportunistic Infections and Efficacy Following Conversion to Belatacept-Based Therapy after Kidney Transplantation: A French Multicenter Cohort

Conversion from calcineurin-inhibitors (CNIs) to belatacept can help kidney-transplant (KT) recipients avoid CNI-related nephrotoxicity. The risk of associated opportunistic infections (OPIs) is ill-defined. We conducted a multicentric cohort study across 15 French KT-centers in a real-life setting. Between 07-2010 and 07-2019, 453 KT recipients were converted from CNI- to belatacept-based therapy at 19 [0.13-431] months post-transplantation. Most patients, i.e., 332 (79.3%), were converted after 6-months post-transplantation. Follow-up time after conversion was 20.1 +/- 13 months. OPIs developed in 42(9.3%) patients after 14 +/- 12 months post-conversion. Eight patients (19%) had two OPI episodes during follow-up. Incidences of CMV DNAemia and CMV disease were significantly higher in patients converted before 6-months post-KT compared to those converted later (i.e., 31.6% vs. 11.5%; p < 0.001; and 11.6% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). Cumulative incidence of OPIs was 6.5 OPIs/100 person-years. Incidence of CMV disease was 2.8/100 person-years, of pneumocystis pneumonia 1.6/100 person-years, and of aspergillosis 0.2/100 person-years. Multivariate analyses showed that estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) < 25 mL/min/1.73 m² at conversion was independently associated with OPIs (HR = 4.7 (2.2 - 10.3), p < 0.001). The incidence of EBV DNAemia was 17.3 events /100 person-years. At 1-year post-conversion, mean eGFR had significantly increased from 32.0 +/- 18 mL/min/1.73 m² to 42.2 +/- 18 mL/min/1.73 m² (p < 0.0001). Conversion to belatacept is an effective strategy with a low infectious risk.

Microvascular inflammation is a risk factor in kidney transplant recipients with very late conversion from calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens to belatacept

Background

In de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTR) treatment with belatacept has been established as a comparable option as maintenance immunosuppression, preferably as a strategy to convert from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- to belatacept-based immunosuppression. Switch to belatacept demonstrated improved renal function in patients with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity, but risk of transplant rejection and the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are still a matter of debate. Only few data are available in patients at increased immunological risk and late after transplantation.

Methods

We analyzed 30 long-term KTR (including 2 combined pancreas-KTR) converted from CNI to belatacept > 60 months after transplantation with moderate to severe graft dysfunction (GFR ≤ 45 mL/min). Biopsies were classified according to the Banff 2015 criteria. Group differences were assessed in a univariate analysis using Mann Whitney U or Chi square test, respectively. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment failure was performed using a binary logistic regression model including significant predictors from univariate analysis. Fifty-six KTR matched for donor and recipient characteristics were used as a control cohort remaining under CNI-treatment.

Results

Patient survival in belatacept cohort at 12/24 months was 96.7%/90%, overall graft survival was 76.7 and 60.0%, while graft survival censored for death was 79.3%/66.7%. In patients with functioning grafts, median GFR improved from 22.5 mL/min to 24.5 mL/min at 24 months. Positivity for DSA at conversion was 46.7%. From univariate analysis of risk factors for graft loss, GFR < 25 mL/min (p = 0.042) and Banff microvascular inflammation (MVI) sum score ≥ 2 (p = 0.023) at conversion were significant at 24 months. In the analysis of risk factors for treatment failure, a MVI sum score ≥ 2 was significant univariately (p = 0.023) and in a bivariate (p = 0.037) logistic regression at 12 months. DSA-positivity was neither associated with graft loss nor treatment failure. The control cohort had comparable graft survival outcomes at 24 months, albeit without increase of mean GFR in patients with functioning grafts (ΔGFR of − 3.6 ± 8.5 mL/min).

Conclusion

Rescue therapy with conversion to belatacept is feasible in patients with worsening renal function, even many years after transplantation. The benefit in patients with MVI and severe GFR impairment remains to be investigated.

Costimulation Blockade in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Costimulation between T cells and antigen-presenting cells is essential for the regulation of an effective alloimmune response and is not targeted with the conventional immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Costimulation blockade therapy with biologicals allows precise targeting of the immune response but without non-immune adverse events. Multiple costimulation blockade approaches have been developed that inhibit the alloimmune response in kidney transplant recipients with varying degrees of success. Belatacept, an immunosuppressive drug that selectively targets the CD28-CD80/CD86 pathway, is the only costimulation blockade therapy that is currently approved for kidney transplant recipients. In the last decade, belatacept therapy has been shown to be a promising therapy in subgroups of kidney transplant recipients; however, the widespread use of belatacept has been tempered by an increased risk of acute kidney transplant rejection. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the costimulation blockade therapies that are currently in use or being developed for kidney transplant indications.