1
|
Couch E, Zhang W, Belanger E, Shepherd-Banigan M, DePasquale N, Van Houtven CH, Gadbois EA, Wetle T. "There has to be more caring": patient and care partner experiences of the disclosure of amyloid-β PET scan results. Aging Ment Health 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38919069 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2371471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore patient and care partner experiences of receiving an amyloid scan result, with a focus on how clinician disclosure practices influenced patient and care partner emotional responses to the scan result and/or diagnosis. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with 38 people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and 62 care partners who experienced the disclosure of results from an amyloid PET scan as part of the CARE-IDEAS study. We used thematic analysis to analyze interview transcripts. RESULTS We identified four aspects of the disclosure process that could influence patient and care partner emotional experiences of the scan result/diagnosis: (1) mode of delivery, (2) presence of a care partner, (3) clarity of the scan result explanation, and (4) discussion of post-scan treatment and support options. CONCLUSIONS Emotional experiences of an amyloid scan result can vary depending on how results are communicated. These findings support previous efforts to develop standard disclosure protocols. Scan results should be delivered in person with the care partner present. Clinicians should give a clear explanation of the result and its implications in an empathetic manner. Options for treatment and support should be discussed for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyse Couch
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Wenhan Zhang
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Emmanuelle Belanger
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nicole DePasquale
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Emily A Gadbois
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Terrie Wetle
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Linden I, Wolfs C, Hevink M, Dirksen C, Ponds R, Perry M. Why to test for dementia: perspectives of patients, significant others and general practitioners. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afad251. [PMID: 38251737 PMCID: PMC10801826 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to provide greater insight into the current decision-making process on diagnostic testing for dementia by exploring the expectations, needs and experiences of patients with memory complaints, significant others and general practitioners (GPs). METHODS We performed semi-structured interviews with patients (>60 years) who consulted their GP on memory complaints, significant others and GPs. Participants were recruited until data saturation was reached in thematic analysis of interview transcripts. RESULTS We performed 51 interviews (patients n = 20, significant others n = 15, GPs n = 16). Thematic analysis revealed four themes: (i) 'drivers to (not) testing', i.e. need to act on symptoms, beliefs on the necessity and expected outcomes of diagnostic testing; (ii) 'patient preferences and context are critical in the actual decision', i.e. in the actual decision-making process interpretation of symptoms, GPs' desire to meet patient preferences, social context and healthcare system dynamics guided the decision; (iii) 'need for individualised communication in the decision-making process', i.e. for patients feeling heard was a prerequisite for decision-making and GPs tailored communication strategies to individual patients and (iv) 'GP practice and barriers to shared decision-making (SDM)', i.e. although GPs value SDM in the decision on diagnostic testing for dementia, patients express limited awareness of the decision and options at stake. CONCLUSIONS Decision-making on diagnostic testing for dementia is a multifactorial and preference-guided process for all involved stakeholders, but decisions are often not explicitly jointly made. Development of patient decision aids could facilitate better involvement and more informed choices by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Linden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Claire Wolfs
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maud Hevink
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf Ponds
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Perry
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Henderson JT, Martin A, Patnode CD, Henrikson NB. A synthesis of qualitative studies on patient and caregiver experiences with cognitive impairment screening and diagnosis. Aging Ment Health 2022:1-12. [PMID: 36193565 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2126431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand patient and caregiver perspectives on the experience of being screened or diagnosed with cognitive impairment to inform preventive clinical care. METHODS Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies with searches in Ovid MEDLINE ALL, EBSCOHost CINAHL, and Scopus in February 2021. Included studies were assessed for quality and coded with descriptive, deductive, and inductive codes and findings were rated using GRADE-CER-qual. RESULTS We included 15 qualitative studies representing 153 patients and 179 caregivers. Most studies involved in-depth interviews. No studies examined screening experiences for older adults presenting without cognitive function concerns; nearly all patients received a diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Seven themes emerged with moderate to high confidence. Findings showed the role of caregivers in pursuing assessment and its benefits in validating concerns and for future planning. Patients were less inclined to be evaluated, fearing judgements or social consequences from the diagnostic label. Caregivers and patients were at times frustrated with the assessment process yet believed it might result in treatments to cure or slow disease progression. CONCLUSION Clinicians and care systems can support caregivers and patients by providing timely and informative resources to support their shared and separate motivations, needs, and concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian T Henderson
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-Based Practice Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Allea Martin
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-Based Practice Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Carrie D Patnode
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-Based Practice Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Nora B Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Enogela EM, Buchanan T, Carter CS, Elk R, Gazaway SB, Goodin BR, Jackson EA, Jones R, Kennedy RE, Perez-Costas E, Zubkoff L, Zumbro EL, Markland AD, Buford TW. Preserving independence among under-resourced older adults in the Southeastern United States: existing barriers and potential strategies for research. Int J Equity Health 2022; 21:119. [PMID: 36030252 PMCID: PMC9419141 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-022-01721-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Disability prevention and preservation of independence is crucial for successful aging of older adults. To date, relatively little is known regarding disparities in independent aging in a disadvantaged older adult population despite widely recognized health disparities reported in other populations and disciplines. In the U.S., the Southeastern region also known as “the Deep South”, is an economically and culturally unique region ravaged by pervasive health disparities – thus it is critical to evaluate barriers to independent aging in this region along with strategies to overcome these barriers. The objective of this narrative review is to highlight unique barriers to independent aging in the Deep South and to acknowledge gaps and potential strategies and opportunities to fill these gaps. We have synthesized findings of literature retrieved from searches of computerized databases and authoritative texts. Ultimately, this review aims to facilitate discussion and future research that will help to address the unique challenges to the preservation of independence among older adults in the Deep South region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ene M Enogela
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA
| | - Taylor Buchanan
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA
| | - Christy S Carter
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA
| | - Ronit Elk
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA
| | - Shena B Gazaway
- Department of Family, Community, and Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Burel R Goodin
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Jackson
- Department of Medicine - Division of Cardiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Raymond Jones
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA
| | - Richard E Kennedy
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA
| | - Emma Perez-Costas
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA
| | - Lisa Zubkoff
- Department of Medicine - Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Emily L Zumbro
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA
| | - Alayne D Markland
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA.,Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Thomas W Buford
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13thSt. South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA. .,Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Linden I, Hevink M, Wolfs C, Perry M, Dirksen C, Ponds R. Understanding patients' and significant others' preferences on starting a diagnostic trajectory for dementia: An integrative review. Aging Ment Health 2022; 27:862-875. [PMID: 35763442 PMCID: PMC10166060 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2084505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the preferences of people with memory complaints (PwMC) and their significant others regarding starting a diagnostic trajectory for dementia. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase. Selection of abstracts and papers was performed independently by two researchers. Methodological quality was assessed with the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Result sections of the selected papers were thematically synthesized. RESULTS From 2497 citations, seven qualitative studies and two mixed methods studies published between 2010 and 2020 were included. Overall quality of the studies was high to moderate. A thematic synthesis showed that preferences for starting a diagnostic trajectory arose from the feeling of needing to do something about the symptoms, beliefs on the necessity and expected outcomes of starting a diagnostic trajectory. These views were influenced by normalization or validation of symptoms, the support or wishes of the social network, interactions with health care professionals, the health status of the PwMC, and societal factors such as stigma and socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION A variety of considerations with regard to decision-making on starting a diagnostic trajectory for dementia were identified. This emphasizes the need to explore individual preferences to facilitate a timely dementia diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Linden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maud Hevink
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Claire Wolfs
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Perry
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community care, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf Ponds
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
De Cola MC, Triglia G, Camera M, Corallo F, Di Cara M, Bramanti P, Lo Buono V. Effect of neurological screening on early dementia detection in southern Italy. J Int Med Res 2020; 48:300060520949763. [PMID: 33081552 PMCID: PMC7588776 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520949763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Population screening can facilitate early diagnosis of dementia and improve disease management. This study examined the effects of a screening campaign for neurodegenerative disorders on the early diagnosis of dementia using 2-year follow-up data. METHODS A 5-day screening campaign was conducted that comprised neurological, neuropsychological and other specialist examinations. Identification of alterations during the neurological examination was followed-up by further diagnostic examinations to confirm the neurological impairment. RESULTS Neurological alterations were observed in 39% of the screened subjects, who were mostly diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment and referred to a dementia and cognitive disorders centre. Suspicion of neurological impairment was a risk factor for inclusion in a specific neurological ambulatory follow-up and a condition for exemption from payment for medical examinations. CONCLUSIONS Neurodegenerative screening initiatives should include subjects selected by general practitioners. It would be useful to create a network including primary care physicians and cognitive disorder centres. Telemedicine tools (e.g., teleconsulting) could also be used to facilitate early diagnosis.
Collapse
|