Successful Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation Treatment in a Case of Generalized Dystonia due to a Novel ANO3 Mutation

The Clinical Spectrum of ANO3-Report of a New Family and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Mutations in ANO3 are a rare cause of autosomal dominant isolated or combined dystonia, mainly presenting in adulthood.

CASES

We extensively characterize a new, large ANO3 family with six affected carriers. The proband is a young girl who had suffered from tremor and painful dystonic movements in her right arm since the age of 11 years. She later developed a diffuse dystonic tremor and mild extrapyramidal signs (ie, rigidity and hypodiadochokinesis) in her right arm. She also suffered from psychomotor delay and learning difficulties. Repeated structural and functional neuroimaging were unremarkable. A dystonic tremor was also present in her two sisters. Her paternal aunt, father, and a third older sister presented episodic postural tremor in the arms. The father and one sister also presented learning difficulties. The heterozygous p.G6V variant in ANO3 was identified in all affected subjects.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Stratification by age at onset divided ANO3 cases into two major groups, where younger patients displayed a more severe phenotype, probably due to variants near the scrambling domain.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the phenotype of a new ANO3 family and highlight the need for functional studies to explore the impact of ANO3 variants on its phospholipid scrambling activity.

Arching deep brain stimulation in dystonia types

Although medical treatment including botulinum toxic injection is the first-line treatment for dystonia, response is insufficient in many patients. In these patients, deep brain stimulation (DBS) can provide significant clinical improvement. Mounting evidence indicates that DBS is an effective and safe treatment for dystonia, especially for idiopathic and inherited isolated generalized/segmental dystonia, including DYT-TOR1A. Other inherited dystonia and acquired dystonia also respond to DBS to varying degrees. For Meige syndrome (craniofacial dystonia), other focal dystonia, and some rare inherited dystonia, further evidences are still needed to evaluate the role of DBS. Because short disease duration at DBS surgery and absence of fixed musculoskeletal deformity are associated with better outcome, DBS should be considered as early as possible when indicated after careful evaluation including genetic work-up. This review will focus on the factors to be considered in DBS for patients with dystonia and the outcome of DBS in the different types of dystonia.

Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation for Monogenic Dystonia: The Effect of Gene on Outcome

Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi DBS) is the most effective intervention for medically refractory segmental and generalized dystonia in both children and adults. Predictive factors for the degree of improvement after GPi DBS include shorter disease duration and dystonia subtype with idiopathic isolated dystonia usually responding better than acquired combined dystonias. Other factors contributing to variability in outcome may include body distribution, pattern of dystonia and DBS related factors such as lead placement and stimulation parameters. The responsiveness to DBS appears to vary between different monogenic forms of dystonia, with some improving more than others. The first observation in this regard was reports of superior DBS outcomes in DYT-TOR1A (DYT1) dystonia, although other studies have found no difference. Recently a subgroup with young onset DYT-TOR1A, more rapid progression and secondary worsening after effective GPi DBS, has been described. Myoclonus dystonia due to DYT-SCGE (DYT11) usually responds well to GPi DBS. Good outcomes following GPi DBS have also been documented in X-linked dystonia Parkinsonism (DYT3). In contrast, poorer, more variable DBS outcomes have been reported in DYT-THAP1 (DYT6) including a recent larger series. The outcome of GPi DBS in other monogenic isolated and combined dystonias including DYT-GNAL (DYT25), DYT-KMT2B (DYT28), DYT-ATP1A3 (DYT12), and DYT-ANO3 (DYT24) have been reported with varying results in smaller numbers of patients. In this article the available evidence for long term GPi DBS outcome between different genetic dystonias is reviewed to reappraise popular perceptions of expected outcomes and revisit whether genetic diagnosis may assist in predicting DBS outcome.