Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Tumor Resection in Vitrectomy for Retinal Vasoproliferative Tumors

[Morphological features of vasoproliferative tumor of the retina]

Vasoproliferative retinal tumor (VPT) is a term proposed by ophthalmologists in relation to the totality of manifestations of an intraocular volumetric process with involvement of the inner lining of the eye, an integral part of which is the active growth of blood vessels. The available literature data on the morphology of this process are very contradictory and ambiguous. The article presents two clinical cases of vasoproliferative retinal tumor with own illustration of morphological studies.

Retinotomies and retinectomies: A review of indications, techniques, results, and complications

Retinotomy refers to "cutting" or "incising" the retina, whereas retinectomy denotes "excising" the retina. Retinotomies and retinectomies aid in tackling traction and retinal shortening that persist following membrane dissection and scleral buckling. We performed a literature search using Google Scholar and PubMed, followed by a review of the references procured. All relevant literature was studied in detail and summarized. We discuss the indications of retinotomies and retinectomies for relaxing retinal stiffness, accessing the subretinal space for choroidal neovascular membrane, hemorrhage and abscess clearance, drainage retinotomies to allow retinal flattening, radial retinotomies to release circumferential traction, harvesting free retinal grafts, and prophylactic chorioretinectomies in trauma.

SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY FOR INTRAOCULAR COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO VASOPROLIFERATIVE TUMOR OF THE RETINA

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of vitrectomy pars plana vitrectomy in managing intraocular complications relating to vasoproliferative tumors of the retina (VPL).

METHODS

Retrospective study. 17 patients with VPL who underwent vitrectomy at Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Trust from 2005 to 2020 were included. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, intraoperative data, and surgical outcomes were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 52 years. Indications for pars plana vitrectomy included epiretinal membrane (n = 7), vitreous hemorrhage (n = 5), retinal detachment (n = 3), diagnostic (n = 1), and others (n = 1). After pars plana vitrectomy, 14/17 (82.4%) have stabilized vision and 3/17 (17.6%) deteriorated. Subgroup analysis of epiretinal membrane peel had good outcomes with 6/7 (85.7%) noticing improvement or stabilization of symptoms and mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution visual acuity improved from 0.719 [6/30] ± 0.267 [6/12] to 0.476 [6/19] ± 0.271 [6/12]. Patients undergoing surgery for vitreous hemorrhage also had good outcomes with resolution (and no recurrence) of the hemorrhage in 3/5 (60%) and 5/5 (100%) with one or more surgeries, respectively. Outcomes for retinal detachment surgery were logarithm of minimal angle of resolution 2.126 [HM] ± 0.301 [6/12] preoperatively and 1.185 [6/95] ± 0.522 [6/19] postoperatively, with one recurrence of retinal detachment. In the epiretinal membrane group, three patients had adjunctive treatment for VPL intraoperatively and four patients had none, and no difference found between the two groups in outcome or complications. Tumor with thickness of ≥2 mm exhibited inferior visual outcomes compared with <2 mm ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This is one of the largest data sets in looking at outcomes of vitrectomy for complications of VPL. Pars plana vitrectomy is effective and safe in managing VPL-related intraocular complications with good outcomes and a low rate of complications, especially for patients with epiretinal membrane and vitreous hemorrhage.

Repair of a Tractional Retinal Detachment in the Setting of an Idiopathic Vasoproliferative Tumor

Vasoproliferative tumors (VPT) are benign retinal lesions that may cause epiretinal membrane proliferation and tractional retinal detachments (TRD). We describe a case of a 71-year-old woman who presented with a macula involving TRD in the setting of a VPT. Given the limited number of publications on the management of these cases, we aim to articulate some principles we believe may be helpful in planning a surgical approach that maximizes postoperative anatomic and functional outcomes. We hope that our video provides useful guidance in preparing the vitreoretinal surgeon for managing this uncommon entity. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:485-488.].

Vasoproliferative retinal tumors: Clinical presentation and treatment outcome

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of patients with vasoproliferative retinal tumor (VPRT) in India.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 50 eyes in 47 patients.

RESULTS

Of the 50 eyes, 25 (50%) were primary and 25 (50%) were secondary. Common ocular pathologies related to secondary VPRT included retinal detachment (n = 8, 32%) and Coats disease (n = 7, 28%). Overall, the mean age at presentation was 35 years (range; 3-74 years) and included 30 (64%) males and 17 (36%) females. The lesions were unilateral in 44 (94%) patients. Secondary retinal features included intra/subretinal exudation (n = 41, 82%), vascularity (n = 32, 64%), subretinal fluid (n = 21, 42%), retinal neovascularisation (n = 9, 18%) and vitreous hemorrhage (n = 8, 16%). Thirty-four eyes (68%) underwent cryotherapy, of which 16 eyes (47%) received adjunct intravitreal anti-VEGF (12 eyes) or corticosteroid injection (4 eyes). Primary surgery included vitrectomy with/without encirclage and cryotherapy (n = 12, 24%) and plaque brachytherapy (n = 3, 6%). At last follow-up (mean 9.7 months, range 3-67 months), 42 eyes (84%) had complete tumor regression with no improvement in visual outcomes when comparing presenting and final best corrected visual acuity. Comparing primary versus secondary VPRT, secondary VPRT presented a decade earlier (31 vs 40 years), needed surgical intervention (48% vs 20%), had poor tumor control (72% vs 92%) and worse visual outcomes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

VPRTs commonly present as a unilateral lesions in the adult population with equal prevalence of primary and secondary variants. Compared with primary VPRT, secondary VPRTs require surgical treatment and are associated with poor visual outcome.

SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF VASOPROLIFERATIVE RETINAL TUMORS' REFRACTORY TO NONINVASIVE THERAPIES

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment of refractory vasoproliferative retinal tumors (VPTs) and its complications.

METHODS

Clinical charts of all patients diagnosed with VPTs who underwent surgical treatment from 2005 to 2020 were reviewed. Clinical features, surgical techniques, and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

From 25 eyes of 23 patients with VPTs, 17 (68%) eyes underwent surgical intervention to treat tumor activity and associated complications including epiretinal membrane (n = 10, 59%), retinal detachment (n = 8, 47%), and vitreous hemorrhage (n = 3, 18%). All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy with endolaser/cryotherapy to control tumor activity and to treat associated complications. Three cases required tumor resection. At the end of follow-up (mean 55.4 months, range 2-305 months), no eye presented tumor activity or retinal detachment after one or two surgeries. There was no epiretinal membrane recurrence. The mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity was 1.2 ± 0.7 logMAR, and the mean final best-corrected visual acuity was 0.7 ± 0.6 logMAR ( P < 0.05). The best-corrected visual acuity improved two or more lines in 12 (70.5%) eyes at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In this series of patients with large active VPTs, surgical intervention allowed control of the tumor activity in all patients and provided overall satisfactory anatomic and functional outcomes.

Case Report: Exacerbation and Spontaneous Separation of the Epiretinal Membrane Following Laser Photocoagulation of a Vasoproliferative Tumor of the Retina

The present report concerns a rare vasoproliferative tumor of the retina (VPTR) combined with a severe case of secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM). A 56-year-old male patient was diagnosed with VPTR and secondary ERM of the left eye. The patient underwent two rounds of laser photocoagulation (LP) of the tumor. The exacerbation of the ERM was observed after the first round of LP, while spontaneous separation over the five-month follow-up period was noted after the second round of LP. Thus, LP may represent a viable alternative treatment approach for VPTR combined with severe ERM.

Robotic-assisted radiosurgery for the treatment of vasoproliferative tumours

PURPOSE

Vasoproliferative tumours (VPT) are a rare but benign entity that can lead to severe visual acuity deterioration. There is no standard of care, and depending on the degree of clinical features, including tumour size and dissemination, visual acuity and subretinal fluid, treatment options include observation, cryotherapy and brachytherapy. Particularly in larger tumours, brachytherapy has advantages over other options, although higher radiation doses and the need for surgical application are disadvantages of this otherwise effective treatment option. CyberKnife radiosurgery might represent an alternative therapeutic option as no surgical intervention is needed and radiation doses are lower.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with vasoproliferative tumors who were treated with CyberKnife radiosurgery with a minimum follow-up time of 12 months were included in this case series. We recorded visual acuity, number of lesions, central retinal thickness with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and reflectivity using A-scan standardizes echography every three months.

RESULTS

A total of four patients with a median age of 34 years (range: 24 - 51) who were observed over an average of 26.5 months (range: 17 - 49 months) matched our inclusion criteria. We appreciated stabilization or increase in visual acuity in all four patients and a regression in tumour thickness with subsequent increase in internal reflectivity as a marker of increasing fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

We observed good visual and functional outcome following CyberKnife therapy for VPT. We believe that further studies should be pursued to evaluate CyberKnife therapy for the treatment of VPT not treatable with cryo- or lasertherapy.

Management of Vasoproliferative Tumors of the Retina with Macular Complications by Pars Plana Vitrectomy Combined with Episcleral Cryotherapy

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with episcleral cryotherapy in treating vasoproliferative tumors of the retina (VPTR) with macular complications.

Methods

In this retrospective noncomparative interventional case-series analysis, we included 11 eyes of ten patients diagnosed with VPTR. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations and were treated with PPV combined with episcleral cryotherapy. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), tumor activity, retinal morphological structure, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

Results

Macular complications included epimacular membrane (n = 10), macular hole (n = 3), and macular edema (n = 1). Tumors were treated with triple freeze-thaw episcleral cryotherapy during PPV. The mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA dropped from 0.62 ± 0.58 to 0.39 ± 0.46. The difference between the mean values of logMAR BCVA before and after treatment was statistically significant (t = 2.48, P=0.033). The tumor activity was controlled effectively in nine cases. Compared with preoperative tumor activity, tumor activity after treatment was significantly lower (P < 0.01). The increase of central retinal thickness and the disruption of retinal layers were associated with macular holes, macular edema, and retinal proliferative membrane. After the treatment, visual acuity improved in 91% of the cases, and 73% had no long-term complications.

Conclusion

PPV combined with episcleral cryotherapy promoted tumor regression, preserved retinal integrity, and improved visual acuity. Thus, the combination of PPV with episcleral cryotherapy can be considered effective and safe for the management of VPTR with macular complications.