The Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use Disorder on Complications and Costs following Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Impact of Chronic Opioid Use on Postoperative Mobility Recovery and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Propensity-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

Opioid use prior to total joint arthroplasty may be associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. However, few studies have reported the impact on postoperative recovery of mobility. We hypothesized that chronic opioid users would demonstrate impaired objective and subjective mobility recovery compared to nonusers.

METHODS

A secondary data analysis of a multicenter, prospective observational cohort study in which patients used a smartphone-based care management platform with a smartwatch for self-directed rehabilitation following hip or knee arthroplasty was performed. Patients were matched 2:1 based on age, body mass index, sex, procedure, Charnley class, ambulatory status, orthopedic procedure history, and anxiety. Postoperative mobility outcomes were measured by patient-reported ability to walk unassisted at 90 days, step counts, and responses to the 5-level EuroQol-5 dimension 5-level, compared by Chi-square and student's t-tests. Unmatched cohorts were also compared to investigate the impact of matching.

RESULTS

A total of 153 preoperative chronic opioid users were matched to 306 opioid-naïve patients. Age (61.9 ± 10.5 versus 62.1 ± 10.3, P = .90) and sex (53.6 versus 53.3% women, P = .95) were similar between groups. The proportion of people who reported walking unassisted for 90 days did not vary in the matched cohort (87.8 versus 90.7%, P = .26). Step counts were similar preoperatively and 1-month postoperatively but were lower in opioid users at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (4,823 versus 5,848, P = .03). More opioid users reported moderate to extreme problems with ambulation preoperatively on the 5-level EuroQol-5 dimension 5-level (80.6 versus 69.0%, P = .02), and at 6 months (19.2 versus 9.3%, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective and objective measures of postoperative mobility were significantly reduced in patients who chronically used opioid medications preoperatively. Even after considering baseline factors that may affect ambulation, objective mobility metrics following arthroplasty were negatively impacted by preoperative chronic opioid use.

Effects of socioeconomic burden on opioid use following total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Preoperative opioid users experience worse outcomes and higher complication rates compared to opioid-naïve patients following shoulder arthroplasty. This study evaluates the effects of socioeconomic status, as measured by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), on pre- and postoperative opioid use and its influence on clinical outcomes such as readmission and revision surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty (Current Procedural Terminology code 23472) from 2014 to 2022 at a single academic institution was performed. Exclusion criteria included arthroplasty for fracture, active malignancy, and revision arthroplasty. Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, DCI, and clinical outcomes including 90-day readmission and revision surgery were collected. Patients were classified according to the DCI score of their zip code. Using the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program database, patient pre- and postoperative opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents was gathered.

RESULTS

Individuals from distressed communities used more opioids within 90 days preoperatively compared to patients from prosperous, comfortable, mid-tier, and at-risk populations, respectively. Patients from distressed communities also used significantly more opioids within 90 days postoperatively compared with prosperous, comfortable, and mid-tier, respectively. Of patients from distressed communities, 35.1% developed prolonged opioid use (filling prescriptions >30 days after surgery), significantly more than all other cohorts. Among all patients, 3.5% were readmitted within 90 days and were more likely to be prolonged opioid users (38.9 vs. 21.3%, P < .001). Similarly, 1.5% of patients underwent revision surgery. Those who underwent revision were significantly more likely to be prolonged opioid users (38.2 vs. 21.7%, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder arthroplasty patients from distressed communities use more opioids within 90 days before and after their surgery and are more likely to become prolonged opioid users, placing them at risk for readmission and revision surgery. Identifying patients at an increased risk for excess opioid use is essential to employ appropriate strategies that minimize the detrimental effects of prolonged use following surgery.

The Association Between Mental Health, Substance Use Disorder, and Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Prior studies suggest that distressed patients or those who have poor mental health have inferior postoperative outcomes when compared to nondistressed patients. However, these studies typically do not account for substance use or other comorbidities often found in this population, which can independently contribute to postoperative complications. This study sought to control for these factors and assess if a diagnosis of a mental health condition is directly associated with worse outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for 3,182 patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty and 4,430 patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty. Diagnosis of the mental health disorders included depression, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder, bipolar disorder, trauma, stressor-related disorder, and schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Multivariable analyses were performed to control for alcohol use, drug use, tobacco use, body mass index, and a comorbidity index.

RESULTS

When controlling for body mass index and Charlson comorbidity index, no statistically significant associations were found between a diagnosis of any mental health condition or a specific diagnosis of depression or anxiety, and 90-day readmission, reoperation, or 1 year mortality for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

When accounting for confounding factors, there does not appear to be a direct association between diagnosis of any of the psychiatric conditions we studied and outcomes after primary total joint arthroplasty. While prior studies suggest addressing the mental health condition may improve outcomes, this study suggests that preoperative medical optimization and potentially addressing substance use may be more effective strategies.

Impact of opioid dependence on outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The opioid epidemic is a well-established problem encountered in orthopedic surgery in the United States. Evidence in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty and spine surgery suggests a link between chronic opioid use and increased expense and rates of surgical complications. The purpose of this study was to study the impact of opioid dependence (OD) on the short-term outcomes following primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

METHODS

A total of 58,975 patients undergoing primary anatomic and reverse TSA were identified using the National Readmission Database from 2015 to 2019. Preoperative opioid dependence status was used to divide patients into 2 cohorts, with 2089 patients being chronic opioid users or having opioid use disorders. Preoperative demographic and comorbidity data, postoperative outcomes, cost of admission, total hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge status were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis was conducted to control for the influence of independent risk factors other than OD on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared to nonopioid-dependent patients, OD patients undergoing TSA had higher odds of postoperative complications including any complications within 180 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-1.7), readmission within 180 days (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.5), revision within 180 days (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.1), dislocation (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9), bleeding (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.4), and gastrointestinal complication (OR 14, 95% CI 4.3-48). Total cost ($20,741 vs. $19,643), LOS (1.8 ± 1.8 days vs. 1.6 ± 1.7 days), and likelihood for discharge to another facility or home with home health care (18 vs. 16% and 23% vs. 21%, respectively) were higher in patients with OD.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative opioid dependence was associated with higher odds of postoperative complications, rates of readmission and revision, costs, and health care utilization following TSA. Efforts focused on mitigating this modifiable behavioral risk factor may lead to better outcomes, lower complications, and decreased associated costs.

Risk Factors for Prolonged Opioid Use After Ankle Fracture Surgery

BACKGROUND

The incidence of ankle fractures is increasing, and risk factors for prolonged opioid use after ankle fracture fixation are unknown. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors that lead to prolonged opioid use after surgery.

METHODS

The Truven MarketScan database was used to identify patients who underwent ankle fracture surgery from January 2009 to December 2018 based on CPT codes. Patient characteristics were collected, and patients separated into 3 cohorts based on postoperative opioid use (no refills, refills within 6 months postoperative, and refills within 1 year postoperatively). The χ2 test and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the association between risk factors and prolonged use.

RESULTS

In total, 34 691 patients were analyzed. Comorbidities most highly associated with prolonged opioid use include 2+ preoperative opioid prescriptions (odds ratio [OR] = 11.92; P < .001), tobacco use (OR = 2.03; P < .001), low back pain (OR = 1.81; P < .001), depression (OR = 1.48; P < .001), diabetes (OR = 1.34; P < .001), and alcohol abuse (OR = 1.32; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Opioid use after ankle fracture surgery is common and may be necessary; however, prolonged opioid use and development of dependence carries significant risk. Identifying those patients at an increased risk for prolonged opioid use can aid providers in tailoring their postoperative pain regimen.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, Level III.

Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2040-2060

Background

National projections of future joint arthroplasties are useful in understanding the changing burden of surgery and related outcomes on the health system. The aim of this study is to update the literature by producing Medicare projections for revision total joint arthroplasty procedures from 2040 through 2060.

Methods

The study uses 2000-2019 data from the CMS Medicare Part-B National Summary and combines procedure counts using CPT codes for revision total joint arthroplasty procedures. In 2019, revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) procedures totaled 53,217 and 30,541, respectively, forming a baseline from which we generated point forecasts between 2020 and 2060 and 95% forecast intervals (FI).

Results

On average, the model projects an annual growth rate of 1.77% for rTHAs and 4.67% for rTKAs. By 2040, rTHAs were projected to be 43,514 (95% FI = 37,429-50,589) and rTKAs were projected to be 115,147 (95% FI = 105,640-125,510). By 2060, rTHAs was projected to be 61,764 (95% FI = 49,927-76,408) and rTKAs were projected to be 286,740 (95% FI = 253,882-323,852).

Conclusions

Based on 2019 total volume counts, the log-linear exponential model forecasts an increase in rTHA procedures of 42% by 2040 and 101% by 2060. Similarly, the estimated increase for rTKA is projected to be 149% by 2040 and 520% by 2060. An accurate projection of future revision procedure demands is important to understand future healthcare utilization and surgeon demand. This finding is only applicable to the Medicare population and demands further analysis for other population groups.

Chronic Opioid Use Independently Increases Complications and Resource Utilization After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Current literature suggests a link between the chronic use of opioids and musculoskeletal surgical complications. Given the current opioid epidemic, the need to elucidate the effects of chronic opioid use (OD) on patient outcomes and cost has become important. The purpose of this study was to determine if OD is an independent risk factor for inpatient postoperative complications and resource utilization after primary total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 3,545,565 patients undergoing elective, unilateral, primary total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty for osteoarthritis from January 2016 to December 2019 were identified using a large national database. In-hospital postoperative complications, length of stay, and total costs adjusted for inflation in opioid + patients were compared with patients without chronic opioid use (OD). Logistic regression analyses were used to control for cofounding factors.

RESULTS

OD patients undergoing either THA or TKA had a higher risk of postoperative complications including respiratory (odds ratio (OR): 1.4 and OR: 1.3), gastrointestinal (OR: 1.8 and OR: 1.8), urinary tract infection (OR: 1.1 and OR: 1.2), blood transfusion (OR: 1.5 and OR: 1.4), and deep vein thrombosis (OR: 1.7 and OR: 1.6), respectively. Total cost ($16,619 ± $9,251 versus $15,603 ± $9,181, P < .001), lengths of stay (2.15 ± 1.37 versus 2.03 ± 1.23, P < .001), and the likelihood for discharge to a rehabilitation facility (17.8 versus 15.7%, P < .001) were higher in patients with OD.

CONCLUSION

OD was associated with higher risk for in-hospital postoperative complications and cost after primary THA and TKA. Further studies to find strategies to mitigate the impact of opioid use on complications are required.

Impact of preexisting opioid dependence on morbidity, length of stay, and inpatient cost of urological oncological surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of preexisting opioid dependence in patients undergoing elective urological oncological surgery. In addition, to quantify the impact of preexisting opioid dependence on outcomes and cost of common urologic oncological procedures at a national level in the USA.

METHODS

We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to study 1,609,948 admissions for elective partial/radical nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy, and cystectomy procedures. Trends of preexisting opioid dependence were studied over 2003-2014. We use multivariable-adjusted analysis to compare opioid-dependent patients to those without opioid dependence (reference group) in terms of outcomes, namely major complications, length of stay (LOS), and total cost.

RESULTS

The incidence of opioid dependence steadily increased from 0.6 per 1000 patients in 2003 to 2 per 1000 in 2014. Opioid-dependent patients had a significantly higher rate of major complications (18 vs 10%; p < 0.001) and longer LOS (4 days (IQR 2-7) vs 2 days (IQR 1-4); p < 0.001), when compared to the non-opioid-dependent counterparts. Opioid dependence also increased the overall cost by 48% (adjusted median cost $18,290 [IQR 12,549-27,715] vs. $12,383 [IQR 9225-17,494] in non-opioid-dependent, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed the independent association of preexisting opioid dependence with major complications, length of stay in 4th quartile, and total cost in 4th quartile.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of preexisting opioid dependence before elective urological oncology is increasing and is associated with adverse outcomes after surgery. There is a need to further understand the challenges associated with opioid dependence before surgery and identify and optimize these patients to improve outcomes.

Prevalence and Outcomes of Opioid Use Disorder in Pediatric Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic opioid use among adolescents is a leading preventable public health problem in the United States. Consequently, a sizable proportion of surgical patients in this age group may have a comorbid opioid use disorder (OUD). No previously published study has examined the prevalence of OUD and its impact on postoperative morbidity or mortality in the adolescent surgical population. Our objective was to investigate the prevalence of comorbid OUD and its association with surgical outcomes in a US adolescent surgical population. We hypothesized that OUD among adolescent surgical patients is on an upward trajectory and that the presence of OUD is associated with higher risk of postoperative morbidity or mortality.

METHODS

Using the pediatric health information system, we performed a 1:1 propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study of adolescents (10-18 years of age) undergoing inpatient surgery between 2004 and 2019. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. The secondary outcomes were surgical complications and postoperative infection. We also evaluated indicators of resource utilization, including mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and postoperative length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Of 589,098 adolescents, 563 (0.1%) were diagnosed with comorbid OUD (563 were matched on OUD). The prevalence of OUD in adolescents undergoing surgery increased from 0.4 per 1000 cases in 2004 to 1.6 per 1000 cases in 2019, representing an average annual percent change (AAPC) of 9.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-13.9; P value < .001). The overall postoperative mortality rate was 0.50% (n = 2941). On univariable analysis, mortality rate was significantly higher in adolescents with comorbid OUD than those without comorbid OUD (3.37% vs 0.50%; P < .001). Among propensity-matched pairs, comorbid OUD diagnosis was associated with an estimated 57% relative increase in the risk of surgical complications (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.24-2.00; P < .001). The relative risk of postoperative infection was 2-fold higher in adolescents with comorbid OUD than in those without OUD (aRR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.62-2.51; P < .001). Adolescents with comorbid OUD had an increased risk of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and extended postoperative LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

OUD is becoming increasingly prevalent in adolescents presenting for surgery. Comorbid OUD is an important determinant of surgical complications, postoperative infection, and resource utilization, underscoring the need to consider OUD as a critical, independent risk factor for postsurgical morbidity.

Rates and Outcomes of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Persons Who Inject Drugs

BACKGROUND

The risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is higher in persons who inject drugs (PWID) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), though reported rates vary widely. This study was designed to assess outcomes of TJA in PWID and to describe factors associated with improved PJI outcomes among PWID.

METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study was performed using a 1:4 match among those with and those without a history of injection drug use (IDU) undergoing TJA. Demographic, surgical, and outcome variables were compared in multivariate logistic regressions to determine PJI predictors. Kaplan-Meier analyses were constructed to characterize the difference in survival of patients who did not have PJI or undergo joint explantation between PWID and the matching cohort.

RESULTS

PWID had a 9-fold increased risk of PJI compared to the matched cohort (odds ratio 9.605, 95% CI 2.781-33.175, P < .001). Ten of 17 PWID whose last use was within 6 months (active use) of primary TJA had a PJI, while 7 of 41 PWID who did not have active use developed a PJI. Of PWID with PJI, treatment failure was seen in 15 of 17, while in patients who did not have an IDU history, 5 of 8 with PJI had treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

IDU is a significant risk factor for PJI following TJA. Future work investigating the effect of a multidisciplinary support team to assist in cessation of IDU and to provide social support may improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in this vulnerable population.

Opioid Legislation Decreases Opioid Prescribing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of opioid-limiting legislation on perioperative opioid prescriptions in total knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that opioid legislation has reduced opioid prescription filling above levels anticipated by national trends. This study retrospectively evaluated opioid prescription filling for all patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in a commercially available insurance database between 2010 and 2018 (n=1,068,764). Initial discharge and 90-day cumulative oxycodone 5-mg equivalents filled were tabulated. Opioid prescription filling was evaluated over time and between states with and without opioid-limiting legislation using analysis of variance and multivariable linear and logistic regression. States with and without opioid legislation had significant reductions in initial and cumulative opioid prescription filling volume (all P<.001). However, the magnitude of this reduction was larger in states with opioid legislation. Legislation targeting duration and volume had the largest impact on initial post-act opioid prescription filling volume compared with states without legislation in an estimated "pre-act" time frame. Legislation targeting duration and volume and no specific target had the largest impact on cumulative post-act opioid prescription filling volume. States without legislation still had large, significant reductions in filling volume, but the magnitude was not as great as in states with opioid legislation. States with and without opioid legislation had significant decreases in initial and cumulative opioid prescription filling volume. However, the magnitude of reduction was larger in states that enacted legislation. Younger age, pre-operative opioid use, and higher comorbidity burden were associated with greater opioid use postoperatively. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

Association of Preoperative Opioid Use With Complication Rates and Resource Use in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background

Preoperative opioid use has been shown to be a negative predictor of patient outcomes, complication rates, and resource utilization in a variety of different orthopaedic procedures. To date, there are no studies investigating its effect on outcomes after hip arthroscopy in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Purpose

To determine the association of preoperative opioid use with postoperative outcomes after hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database was queried for all patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI between 2011 and 2018. Opioid prescriptions filled in the 6 months preceding surgery were queried, and the average daily oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) in this period were computed for each patient. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts: opioid naïve, <1 OME per day, 1 to 5 OMEs per day, and >5 OMEs per day. Postoperative 90-day complications, health care utilization, perioperative costs, postoperative opioid use, and 1- and 3-year revision rates were then compared among cohorts.

Results

A total of 22,124 patients were ultimately included in this study; 31.2% of these patients were prescribed opioids preoperatively. Overall, the percentage of preoperative opioid-naïve patients increased from 64.5% in 2011 to 78.9% in 2018. Patients who received preoperative opioids had a higher rate of complications, increased resource utilization, and increased revision rates. Specifically, on multivariate analysis, patients taking >5 OMEs per day (compared with patients who were preoperatively opioid naïve) had increased odds of a postoperative emergency department visit (Odds Ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.94-2.56; P < .001), 90-day readmission (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.77-2.87; P < .001), increased acute postoperative opioid use (OR, 25.56; 95% CI, 22.98-28.43; P < .001), prolonged opioid use (OR, 10.45; 95% CI, 8.92-12.25; P < .001), and 3-year revision surgery (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.36-3.36; P < .001). Perioperative adjusted costs were increased for all preoperative opioid users and were highest for the >5 OMEs per day cohort ($6255; 95% CI, $5143-$7368).

Conclusion

A large number of patients with FAI are prescribed opioids before undergoing hip arthroscopy, and use of these pain medications is associated with increased health care utilization, increased costs, prolonged opioid use, and early revision surgery.

Preoperative and Postoperative Opioid Prescription Rates in the Total Hip Replacement Surgical Patient

The United States is facing an opioid epidemic that has only worsened with the COVID-19 pandemic. There is little evidence regarding patterns of opioid use among patients with total hip replacement (THR). Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has put forward guidelines for prescribing opioids, it does not include guidance specifically for THR patients suffering from presurgical and postsurgical pain. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare presurgical and postsurgical opioid rates, (2) compare presurgical and postsurgical morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and (3) determine whether having a presurgical opioid prescription predicts the receipt of postsurgical opioid prescriptions among patients undergoing THR surgery. Retrospective cohort analysis of 4,405 patients undergoing THR at a major academic medical center in the United States from April 30, 2015, to April 30, 2018, was done. Patient characteristics, opioid rates, and average MME/day/person were described. Logistic regression was used to determine whether presurgical opioid prescription and opioid risk level predicted postsurgical opioid prescribing. Median age was 64 years (range = 18-85 years); patients were primarily Caucasian/White (78.8%) and female (54.7%). Opioid prescription rates in this sample for the 12-month presurgical and postsurgical periods were 66.1% and 95.6%, respectively. Oxycodone was the most common opioid prescribed in both periods. Among those prescribed an opioid, moderate/high risk for overdose and/or death was 6.3% presurgery and 19.8% postsurgery. Patients with a comorbidity were two times more likely to receive an opioid prescription in the postsurgical period. The median average MME/day/person was 26.5 (range = 0.3-180.0) for patients with an opioid prescribed during the presurgery period and 40.4 (range = 1.5-270.0) during the postsurgery period. Opioid use, regardless of strength, in the presurgical period as well as having one or more comorbidities predicted opioid use in the postsurgical period.

Association of a Substance Use Disorder with Infectious Diseases among Adult Home Healthcare Patients with a Venous Access Device

Substance use disorders (SUDs) and high incidence of infectious diseases are both critical public health issues. Among patients who use a venous access device (VAD) in home care settings, SUDs may play a role in increasing their risk of having a concurrent infectious disease. This study examined the association of SUD with infectious diseases among adult home healthcare patients with a VAD. We identified adult patients with an existing VAD who were admitted to a home healthcare agency August 1, 2017-July 31, 2018 from the electronic health records of a large Medicare-certified agency. Four serious infectious diseases (endocarditis, epidural abscess, septic arthritis, and osteomyelitis) and SUD related to injectable drugs were identified using relevant ICD-10 codes. Multiple logistic regression was performed to examine the association. Of 416 patients with a VAD, 12% (n = 50) had at least one diagnosis of a serious infectious disease. The percentage of patients who had a serious infectious disease was 40% among those with SUDs, compared with only 11% among those without SUDs. After adjusting for age and sex, the odds of having a serious infectious disease was 3.52 times greater for those with SUDs compared with those without (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 4.52 [1.48-13.79], n = .008). Our findings suggest that home healthcare patients with a VAD and a documented SUD diagnosis may have an increased risk of having a concurrent serious infectious disease. Therefore, patients with an SUD and a VAD would need more attention from home healthcare providers to prevent a serious infectious disease. Further research is suggested on modalities of care for individuals with an SUD and VAD to reduce the incidence of infectious diseases so that care can be delivered safely and efficiently in a home healthcare setting.

Impact of preoperative opioid use disorder on outcomes following lumbar-spine surgery

OBJECTIVES

Opioid use disorder (OUD) has previously been shown to negatively impact postoperative outcomes. As the number of spine surgeries continues to rise annually, more patients with preexisting OUD will be seen in operating rooms. Our retrospective cohort study aims to expand on the independent association between preoperative OUD and outcomes following lumbar-spine surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using 2007-2014 data from the State Inpatient Databases (SID) for the states of California (2007-2011), Florida, New York, Maryland, and Kentucky, we identified patients ≥18 years of age undergoing lumbar-spine surgery. Our primary variable of interest was present-on-admission OUD. Outcomes of interest included a range of postoperative complications divided into those specific to spinal surgery and general surgical complications, length of stay (LOS), 30- and 90-day readmission rates, and total hospital charges.

RESULTS

Of the 267,976 patients undergoing lumbar-spine surgery, 1902 patients were identified as having OUD. After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level confounders, we found that patients with OUD were more likely to experience complications related specifically to spine surgery (aOR = 1.51, 95%CI = 1.33-1.71) as well as general postoperative complications (aOR = 1.63, 95%CI = 1.36-1.96) compared to those without OUD. OUD was additionally associated with longer LOS (aIRR = 1.29, CI = 1.24-1.34) and higher total charges (aIRR = 1.14, CI = 1.11-1.18). Whereas no statistically significant difference was detected for 30-day-readmission rates, patients with OUD experienced higher rates of readmission within 90 days of discharge (aOR = 1.20, CI = 1.08-1.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study strengthens the evidence that patients with OUD fare poorly after lumbar-spine surgery. More research is needed to determine whether reducing opioid use before surgery can mitigate the postoperative risks associated with OUD.

The impact of preoperative opioid use on complications, readmission, and cost following ankle fracture surgery

BACKGROUND

The incidence of ankle fractures requiring surgical fixation is increasing. Although there has been increasing evidence to suggest that preoperative opioid use negatively impacts surgical outcomes, literature focusing primarily on ankle fractures is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between preoperative opioid use and outcomes following ankle fracture open reduction and surgical fixation (ORIF). We hypothesized that patients prescribed higher preoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) would have poorer postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

The Truven Marketscan claims database was used to identify patients who underwent ankle fracture surgery from 2009 to 2018 based on CPT codes. We used preoperative opioid use status to divide patients into groups based on the average daily OMEs consumed in the 6 months before surgery: opioid-naive,<1, 1-<5, 5-<10, and ≥10 OMEs per day. We retrieved 90-day complication, ER visit, and readmission rates. Opioid use groups were then compared with binomial logistic regression and generalized linear models.

RESULTS

We identified 61,424 patients. Of those patients, 80.9% did not receive any preoperative opioids, while 6.6%, 6.9%, 1.7%, and 3.9% received <1, 1-<5, 5-<10, and ≥10 OMEs per day over a 6-month time period, respectively. Complications increased with increasing preoperative OMEs. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients using 1-<5 OME per day had increased rates of VTE and infections, while patients using >5 OME per day had higher rates of ED visits, and patients using >10 OMEs had higher rates of pain related ED visits and readmissions. Adjusted differences in 6-month preoperative and 3-month postoperative health care costs were seen in the opioid use groups compared with opioid-naive patients, ranging from US$2052 to US$8,592 (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Opioids use prior to ankle fracture surgery is a common scenario. Unfortunately preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for postoperative complications, ER visits, and readmissions. Furthermore this risk is greater with higher dose opioid use. The results of this study suggests that surgeons should encourage decreased opioid use prior to ankle fracture surgery.

Exploration of Overdose Risk Score and Postoperative Complications and Health Care Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty

IMPORTANCE

The adverse outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) associated with preoperative prescription drug use (ie, use of narcotics, sedatives, and stimulants) have been established but are not well quantified.

OBJECTIVE

To test the association of preoperative overdose risk score (ORS) with postoperative health care use.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study was conducted using data on a consecutive sample of individuals who underwent primary TKA from November 2018 through March 2020 at a tertiary care health system. Data were collected using the Orthopaedic Minimal Data Set Episode of Care, a validated data-collection system for all elective orthopedic surgical interventions taking place within the health care system. Outcomes were assessed at 90 days postoperatively. Individuals whose preoperative baseline characteristics or ORS were not provided or who declined to participate were excluded. Data were analyzed from September through October 2020.

EXPOSURE

Patient-specific preoperative ORS, as measured using NarxCare, associated with patterns of prescription drug use.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Associations between patient-specific ORS categories and 90-day postoperative health care use (ie, prolonged hospital length of stay [LOS; ie, >2 days], nonhome discharge, all-cause 90-day readmission, emergency department [ED] visits, and reoperation) were evaluated. Outcomes were also compared between a group of individuals with ORS less than 300 vs those with ORS 300 or greater who were propensity score matched (4:1; caliper, 0.1) using demographic characteristics (ie, age, sex, race, body mass index, and smoking status) and baseline comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among 4326 individuals who underwent primary TKA, 2623 (60.63%) were women, 3602 individuals (83.26%) were White, the mean (SD) BMI was 32.8 (6.9), and the mean (SD) age was 66.6 (9.2) years; 90-day follow-up was available for the entire cohort. The predominant preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis, occurring among 4170 individuals (96.4%). For individuals with an ORS of 300 to 399, there were significantly higher odds of a prolonged LOS (odds ratio [OR], 2.03; 95% CI, 1.46-2.82; P < .001), nonhome discharge (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.37-2.94; P < .001), all-cause 90-day readmission (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.01-2.42; P < .001), and ED visits (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.11-2.38; P = .01) compared with individuals who were prescription drug naive (ie, ORS = 0). Individuals in the highest ORS category (ie, ORS ≥ 500) had the highest ORs for prolonged LOS (OR, 3.71; 95% CI, 2.00-6.87; P < .001), nonhome discharge (OR, 4.09; 95% CI, 2.02-8.29; P < .001), 90-day readmission (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.23-8.71; P < .001), and 90-day reoperation (OR, 6.09; 95% CI, 1.44-25.80; P = .01). Propensity score matching confirmed the association between an ORS of 300 or greater and the incidence of prolonged LOS (244 individuals [11.6%] vs 130 individuals [23.0%]; P < .001), nonhome discharge (176 individuals [8.4%] vs 93 individuals [16.4%]; P < .001), all-cause 90-day readmission (119 individuals [5.7%] vs 65 individuals [11.5%]; P < .001), and all-cause ED visits (198 individuals [9.4%] vs 76 individuals [13.4%]; P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that higher ORS was associated with increased health care use after primary TKA. These findings suggest that an ORS of 300 or greater could be used to designate increased risk and guide the preoperative surgeon-patient discussion to modify prescription drug use patterns.

Preoperative opioid use is an independent risk factor for complication, revision, and increased health care utilization following primary total shoulder arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in increasing. Evidence in primary hip and knee arthroplasty suggest that preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for postoperative complication. This relationship in TSA is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate this relationship.

METHODS

The Truven Marketscan claims database was used to identify patients who underwent primary, unilateral TSA. Preoperative opioid use status was then used to divide patients into cohorts based on the average daily oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) received in the 6-month preoperative period. This included the following cohorts: opioid naïve and <1, 1-5, 5-10, and >10 average daily OMEs. In total, 29,454 patients with 90-day postoperative follow-up were included. Of these, 21,580 patients and 8959 patients had 1- and 3-year follow-up, respectively. Patient information and complication data were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were then performed to assess the association of preoperative opioid use with postoperative outcomes. A subgroup analysis was performed to examine revision surgery at 1 and 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of identified patients received preoperative opioids, but the preoperative opioid-naïve patient became more common over the study period. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients receiving >10 average daily OMEs (compared with opioid naïve) had higher odds of opioid overdose (odds ratio [OR] 4.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-11.08, P = .004), wound complication (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.44-2.89, P < .001), superficial surgical site infection (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.63-3.34, P < .001), prosthetic joint infection (OR 3.41, 95% CI 2.50-4.67, P < .001), pneumonia (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.39-2.75, P < .001), and thromboembolic event (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.72, P < .001). The same group had higher health care utilization, including extended length of stay, nonhome discharge, readmission, and emergency department visits (P ≤ .001). Total perioperative adjusted costs were more than $7000 higher in the >10-OME group when compared to preoperative opioid-naïve patients.

DISCUSSION

Opioid use prior to TSA is common and is associated with increased complications, health care utilization, revision surgery, and costs. This risk is dose dependent, and efforts should be made at cessation prior to surgery.

Effect of Daily Dosage of Morphine Milligram Equivalents on Free Flap Complications: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

There appears to be an association between preoperative opioid use and postoperative complications. We sought to determine whether patients with a history of chronic opiate use (defined as 3 months or more of sustained use) prior to undergoing free flap surgery have higher rates of 30-day complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing free flaps from 2015 to 2020 was performed. Patient characteristics were analyzed, including daily preoperative dose of opiates, which were then converted to morphine milligram equivalents; intra-operative variables such as estimated blood loss and operating room time; and 30-day outcomes, including wound and flap complications, return to the operating room, and readmissions.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-five patients received 160 free flaps. Of these flaps, 50/160 (31%) were performed on patients with an opiate prescription for at least three months prior to surgery. Using multivariable analysis, morphine milligram equivalents, a surrogate for opioid dose, were significantly associated with flap complications (odds ratio (OR) 1.011, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.003-1.020, p<0.01), partial flap loss (OR 1.010, 95% CI 1.003-1.019, p<0.01), and surgical site infections (OR 1.017, 95% CI 1.007-1.027, p<0.01). Additionally, estimated blood loss was associated with partial flap loss (OR 4.838, 95% CI 1.589-14.728, p<0.006), and operating room time was also associated with flap complications (OR 1.337, 95% CI 1.152-1.150, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Chronic preoperative opioid use is common for free flap surgery, and according to our single-center experience, higher daily doses are a risk factor for flap complications and surgical site infections. These findings add to the growing body of evidence that opioid use is a modifiable risk factor that may increase surgical morbidity.

Preoperative Patient Factors and Postoperative Complications as Risk Factors for New-Onset Depression Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Depression is known to be a risk factor for complication following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), but little is known about new-onset depression (NOD) following THA. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of NOD and identify risk factors for its occurrence after THA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of the Truven MarketScan database. Patients undergoing primary THA were identified and separated into cohorts based on the presence or not of NOD. Patients with preoperative depression or a diagnosis of fracture were excluded. Patient demographic and comorbid data were queried, and postoperative complications were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was then performed to assess the association of NOD with patient-specific factors and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

In total, 111,838 patients undergoing THA were identified and 2517 (2.25%) patients had NOD in the first postoperative year. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative opioid use, female gender, higher Elixhauser comorbidity index, preoperative anxiety disorder, drug or alcohol use disorder, and preoperative smoking were associated with the occurrence of NOD (P ≤ .001). The following postoperative complications were associated with increased odds of NOD: prosthetic joint infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.34, P < .001), aseptic revision surgery (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.06-2.04, P = .019), periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.13-2.61, P = .01), and non-home discharge (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.42-1.77, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

NOD is common following THA and there are multiple patient-specific factors and postoperative complications which increase the odds of its occurrence. Providers should use this information to identify at-risk patients so that pre-emptive prevention strategies may be employed.

Meta-analysis of retrospective studies suggests that the pre-operative opioid use is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in total hip and or knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Opioid use is prevalent in the general population. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to evaluate whether it affects patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following total hip or knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

The following databases were systematically searched on February 5, 2020: Medline, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they compared patients who received opioids or not before total hip or knee arthroplasty. Outcomes of interest were rates of post-operative revision, peri-prosthetic infection, and readmission.

RESULTS

Ten retrospective studies were included for review. Pre-operative opioid use was identified as a risk factor for post-operative revision [odds ratio (OR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.73, p<0.01], peri-prosthetic infection (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.71, p=0.01), and readmission (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.20-1.75, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The available evidence indicates that pre-operative opioid use increases the risk of adverse outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty. Orthopedic physicians should consider these risks when treating their patients.

Return to Work Following Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: The Effect of Patient Intent and Preoperative Work Status

BACKGROUND

The ability of total knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA) to facilitate return to work (RTW) when it is the patient's preoperative intent to do so remains unclear. We aimed at determining whether TKA/THA facilitated RTW in patients of working age who intended to return.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of 173 consecutive patients <65 years of age, undergoing unilateral TKA (n = 82: median age 58; range, 39-65; 36 [43.9%] male) or THA (n = 91: median age 59; range, 34-65; 42 [46.2%] male) during 2018. Oxford knee/hip scores, Oxford-Activity and Participation Questionnaire, and EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) scores were measured preoperatively and at 1 year when an employment questionnaire was also completed.

RESULTS

Of patients who intended to RTW, 44 of 52 (84.6%) RTW by 1 year following TKA (at mean 14.8 ± 8.4 weeks) and 53 of 60 (88.3%) following THA (at mean 13.6 ± 7.5 weeks). Failure to RTW despite intent was associated with job physicality for TKA (P = .004) and negative preoperative EQ-5D for THA (P = .01). In patients unable to work before surgery due to joint disease, fewer RTW: 4 of 21 (19.0%) after TKA; and 6 of 17 (35.3%) after THA. Preoperative Oxford knee score >18.5 predicted RTW with 74% sensitivity (P < .001); preoperative Oxford hip score >19.5 predicted RTW with 75% sensitivity (P < .001). Preoperative EQ-5D indices were similarly predictive (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In this United Kingdom study, preoperative intent to RTW was the most powerful predictor of actual RTW following TKA/THA. Where patients intend to RTW following TKA/THA, 85% RTW following TKA and 88% following THA.

The impact of preoperative tramadol-only use on outcomes following total knee arthroplasty - Is tramadol different than traditional opioids?

BACKGROUND

Opioid use prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is known to have detrimental influence on postoperative outcomes. Whether or not the same is true for tramadol is currently unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between preoperative tramadol and postoperative complications.

METHODS

The Truven Marketscan® Databases were used to conduct this retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing primary TKA were identified and divided into cohorts based on preoperative medication status (i.e. opioid naïve, tramadol-only, or non-tramadol opioids). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day outcomes were collected and compared between cohorts. Revision rates were analyzed at 1- and 3-years postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

336,316 patients were included and 23,097 (6.9%) were preoperative tramadol-only users. Tramadol-only patients (v. opioid naïve) had increased odds of 90-day readmission (OR-1.07, 95%CI 1.02-1.12, p = 0.004), wound complication (OR-1.13, 95%CI 1.01-1.27, p = 0.34), and 3-year revision rates (OR-1.35, 95%CI 1.19-1.53, p < 0.001). However, when compared to the preoperative opioid cohorts, tramadol-only patients had decreased odds of nearly all outcomes. Over the study period, the number of patients receiving preoperative opioids decreased while the proportion of patients prescribed tramadol-only increased.

CONCLUSIONS

While tramadol-only use has lower risk than traditional opioids, tramadol-only use preceding TKA is associated with increased rates of readmission, wound complication and revision surgery. This is important information for prescribers who may be using tramadol to treat symptomatic knee arthrosis prior to arthroplasty referral and for thought leaders producing clinical practice guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Prognostic.

Preoperative Opioid Use Is a Risk Factor for Revision Surgery, Complications, and Increased Resource Utilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown preoperative opioid use to influence outcomes after various surgical procedures. Researchers have not assessed this relationship after rotator cuff repair (RCR).

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The purpose was to assess the relationship between preoperative opioid use and outcomes after arthroscopic RCR. We hypothesized that patients prescribed higher daily averages of preoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) would show increased rates of 90-day complications and 3-year revision surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The MarketScan claims database was utilized to identify patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR between 2009 and 2018. We used preoperative opioid use status to divide patients into groups based on the average daily OMEs consumed in the 6 months before surgery: opioid-naïve, <1, 1-<5, 5-<10, and ≥10 OMEs per day. We retrieved 90-day complication and 3-year revision surgery rates. Opioid use groups were then compared with binomial logistic regression and generalized linear models.

RESULTS

We identified 214,283 patients. Of those patients, 50.7% did not receive any preoperative opioids, while 7.7%, 26.8%, 6.3%, and 8.6% received <1, 1-<5, 5-<10, and ≥10 OMEs per day over a 6-month time period, respectively. Complications increased with increasing preoperative OMEs. Multivariate analysis revealed that any patient using ≥1 OME per day had increased rates of 3-year revision surgery, reoperations, and infections. Specifically, patients averaging ≥10 OMEs per day showed a 103% (odds ratio, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.62-2.54]; P < .001) increase in the odds of revision surgery compared with opioid-naïve patients. Rates of hospital admissions and postoperative emergency department encounters were higher in all opioid use groups. Adjusted differences in 6-month preoperative and 3-month postoperative health care costs were seen in the opioid use groups compared with opioid-naïve patients, ranging from US$1307 to US$5820 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative opioid use was a risk factor for complications and revision surgery after arthroscopic RCR. We also observed a dose-dependent response between opioid use and postoperative complications.

Patient Perceptions of COVID-19-Related Surgical Delay: An Analysis of Patients Awaiting Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 has caused unprecedented delays in elective orthopedic surgery. Understanding patients' perceptions of the disruptions in care and their willingness to reengage the healthcare system are crucial to planning the resumption of elective care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to elicit patient perceptions about delays in total joint arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We identified a consecutive series of patients who experienced COVID-19-driven delays to scheduled total hip or knee arthroplasty at an urban, academic medical center in the Southeastern United States. A 20-item survey was administered via telephone. Answers were recorded and descriptive statistics were performed. A post hoc χ-square analysis compared characteristics and outlooks of patients who did and did not immediately desire surgery.

RESULTS

Of 111 patients (64% of those identified) who met inclusion criteria and completed the survey, 96% said they felt that they were treated fairly and 90% said that the surgical delay was in their best interest; 68% reported emotional distress from the delay, but 45% reported a desire to wait longer for the pandemic to subside. Lower joint-function scores, higher pain levels, higher pain catastrophizing scores, and longer latency from personally deciding to pursue surgery were associated with the reported need for immediate surgery.

CONCLUSION

Overall, patients reported that they understood the need for elective surgical delays during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the psychological implications they reported were not negligible. Patient preference for immediate reengagement with the healthcare system was dichotomous, with many patients favoring precautionarily furthering the delay. Understanding these preferences will help optimize elective orthopedic care during unprecedented times.

Evidence-Based Hospital Procedural Volumes as Predictors of Outcomes After Revision Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to define the evidence-based institutional volume-outcome relationship in revision hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that high-volume centers would be associated with superior outcomes, and that stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis would delineate concrete volume thresholds for optimizing outcomes.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database was queried from 2011 to 2016 for patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. SSLR analysis was used to determine hospital volume cutoffs specific for outcomes of interest. Volume categories were confirmed with multivariate regression.

RESULTS

SSLR analysis produced distinct hospital volume cutoffs for all outcomes. Each subsequent volume threshold diminished patients' risk for adverse outcomes. Tertiles were identified for 90-day infection (≤6, 7-51, ≥52 cases per year). Quartiles were found for 90-day readmission (≤5, 6-15, 16-79, ≥80), 90-day prosthesis-related complication (≤5, 6-16, 17-65, ≥66), 90-day dislocation (≤5, 6-19, 20-79, ≥80), and non-home discharge (≤5, 6-15, 16-40, and ≥41). Quintiles were generated for extended length of stay >2 days (≤2, 3-10, 11-20, 21-30, ≥31). Heptiles were produced for medical complications within 90 days (≤2, 3-8, 9-16, 17-51, 52-89, ≥90).

CONCLUSION

This is the first known study to define evidence-based thresholds for the impact of hospital volume on revision joint arthroplasty. This supports the notion that institutional volume functions as a surrogate for protocolized interdisciplinary coordination of care and surgical experience, and that high-volume centers offer enhanced outcomes for complex cases. Additional studies should investigate the potential role for incentivization of such institutions, as they offer optimal outcomes for revision hip arthroplasty.

Non-Orthopedic Encounters Increase Opioid Exposure in Joint Osteoarthritis: A Single-Institution Analysis

BACKGROUND

There has been little-to-no evidence to support the use of opioid analgesia as a treatment modality for osteoarthritis (OA). Chronic opioid use has been associated with peri-operative and post-operative complications with joint reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to compare opioid-prescribing habits for OA between orthopedic and non-orthopedic physicians to identify encounters that increase opioid exposure.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on opioid-naive adult patients with outpatient opioid prescriptions for OA at a single academic institution between 2013 and 2018. Patients with prior surgery or opioid prescriptions were excluded. Independent t-tests and analysis of variance were used to compare prescription characteristics among providers.

RESULTS

A total of 9625 opioid prescriptions were identified. Non-orthopedic providers account for 92% of prescriptions vs 8% by orthopedic surgeons. The greatest number of prescriptions is written by Internal Medicine (37.1%) and Family Medicine physicians (36.0%). Non-orthopedic physicians prescribe a greater number of prescriptions per patient, dosages, and refills (P < .001 for all). Non-orthopedic encounters are associated with increased risk for prescription dosages ≥50 MME/d (odds ratio 5.81, 95% confidence interval 4.35-7.81, P < .001) and 90 MME/d (odds ratio 18.2, 95% confidence interval 4.43-35.70, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The majority of opioid prescriptions for OA are written by non-orthopedic providers, with higher prescription rates, dosages, and more refills than orthopedic surgeons. OA is a common condition that will benefit from multi-disciplinary awareness to minimize unnecessary opioid exposure and reduce potential complications with joint arthroplasty.

It is not 'business as usual' for orthopaedic surgeons in May 2020- the Austrian-German-Swiss experience

PURPOSE

To document the status-quo of orthopaedic health-care services as the COVID-19 pandemic recedes, and to determine the rate of resumption of orthopaedic surgery in the German-speaking countries in May 2020.

METHODS

A prospective online survey was sent out to 4234 surgeons of the AGA - Society of Arthroscopy and Joint-Surgery (Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie, AGA). The survey was created using SurveyMonkey software and consisted of 23 questions relating to the reduction of orthopaedic services at the participating centres and the impact that the pandemic is having on each surgeon.

RESULTS

A total of 890 orthopaedic surgeons responded to the online survey. Approximately 90% of them experienced a reduction in their surgical caseload and patient contact. 38.7% stated that their institutions returned to providing diagnostic arthroscopies. 54.5% reported that they went back to performing anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR), 62.6% were performing arthroscopic meniscus procedures, and 55.8% had resumed performing shoulder arthroscopy. Only 31.9% of the surgeons were able to perform elective total joint arthroplasty. 60% of the participants stated that they had suffered substantial financial loss due to the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

A gradual resumption of orthopaedic health-care services was observed in May 2020. Typical orthopaedic surgical procedures like ACLR, shoulder arthroscopy and elective total joint arthroplasty were reported to be currently performed by 54%, 56% and 32% of surgeons, respectively. Despite signs of improvement, it appears that there is a prolonged curtailment of orthopaedic health-care at present in the middle of Europe.

Opioid Use Disorder Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Infection after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Large Database Study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that patients with opioid use disorder have impaired immunity. However, few studies with large patient populations have evaluated the risks of surgical site infection (SSI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) with opioid use disorder after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), and there is a lack of evidence for revision TJA in particular.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Are patients with opioid use disorder who undergo (1) primary THA, (2) primary TKA, (3) revision THA, or (4) revision TKA at a higher risk of experiencing SSIs 90 days after surgery or PJIs 2 years after surgery than those who do not have opioid use disorder?

METHODS

All primary and revision TJAs performed between 2005 and 2014 were identified from the Medicare Analytical Files of the PearlDiver Supercomputer using ICD-9 codes. This database is one of the largest nationwide databases; it comprehensively and longitudinally tracks patients based on all insurance claims rather than particular hospital visits, and has a low error rate (estimated at 1.3%). Boolean command operators were used to form a study group of patients with a history of opioid use disorder before surgery. ICD-9 diagnosis codes 304.00 to 304.02 and 305.50 to 305.52 were used to identify patients with opioid use disorder. Study group patients were matched 1:1 to control participants without opioid use disorder undergoing TJA, according to age, sex, and comorbidity burden (Elixhauser comorbidity index [ECI]). The ECI is comprised of 31 different comorbidities and can be used for large administrative databases. The query yielded a study population of 54,332 patients: 14,944 undergoing primary THA (opioid use disorder: n = 7472), 23,680 undergoing primary TKA (opioid use disorder: n = 11,840), 8116 undergoing revision THA (opioid use disorder: n = 4058), and 7592 undergoing revision TKA (opioid use disorder: n = 3796). The primary outcomes analyzed were SSI at 90 days and PJI at 2 years postoperatively, which were identified with ICD-9 codes. Logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the risk that an infection would develop in a patient with opioid use disorder compared with the matched control patients without opioid use disorder.

RESULTS

Patients with opioid use disorder undergoing primary THA had an increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR 1.85 [95% CI 1.51 to 2.25]; p < 0.001) and PJI at 2 years (OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.42 to 1.93]; p < 0.001). Compared with matched controls, opioid use disorder patients undergoing primary TKA had an increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR 1.72 [95% CI 1.46 to 2.02]; p < 0.001) and PJI at 2 years (OR 1.31 [95% CI 1.16 to 1.47]; p < 0.001). Similarly, for revision THAs, there was an increase in 90-day SSIs (OR 1.89 [95% CI 1.53 to 2.32]; p < 0.001) and 2-year PJIs (OR 4.24 [95% CI 3.67 to 4.89]; p < 0.001). The same held for revision TKAs for 90-day SSIs (OR 1.88 [95% CI 1.53 to 2.29]; p < 0.001) and 2-year PJIs (OR 4.94 [95% CI 4.24 to 5.76]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After accounting for age, sex, and comorbidity burden, these results revealed that patients with opioid use disorder undergoing TJA were at increased risk of having SSIs and PJIs. Based on these findings, healthcare systems and/or administrators should recognize the increased associated PJI and SSI risks in patients with opioid use disorder and enact clinical policies that reflect these associated risks. Additionally, these findings should encourage surgeons to pursue multidisciplinary approaches to help patients reduce their opioid consumption before their arthroplasty procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.