Effect of Nebivolol and Olmesartan on 24-Hour Brachial and Aortic Blood Pressure in the Acute Stage of Ischemic Stroke

From Hypertension to Beyond: Unraveling the Diverse Mechanisms of Olmesartan in Disease Modulation

Olmesartan, originally known for its antihypertensive properties, exhibits promising potential in addressing inflammation-mediated diseases. As an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), Olmesartan influences pivotal pathways, including reactive oxygen species, cytokines, NF-κB, TNF-α, and MAPK. This suggests a viable opportunity for repurposing the drug in conditions such as ulcerative colitis, neuropathy, nephropathy, and cancer, as supported by multiple preclinical studies. Ongoing clinical trials, particularly in cardiomyopathy and nephropathy, suggest a broader therapeutic scope for Olmesartan. Repurposing efforts would entail comprehensive investigations using disease-specific preclinical models and dedicated clinical studies. The drug's established safety profile, wide availability, and well-understood ARB mechanism of action offer distinct advantages that could facilitate a streamlined repurposing process. In summary, Olmesartan's versatile impact on inflammation-related pathways positions it as a promising candidate for repurposing across various diseases. Ongoing clinical trials and the drug's favorable attributes enhance its appeal for further exploration and potential application in diverse medical contexts.

Nebivolol and incident cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients compared with nonvasodilatory beta blockers

OBJECTIVE

Nonvasodilatory beta blockers are associated with inferior cardiovascular event reduction compared with other antihypertensive classes, and there is uncertainty about first-line use of beta blockers for hypertension in guidelines. The third generation vasodilatory beta blocker nebivolol has unique beneficial effects on central and peripheral vasculature. Our objective was to compare longitudinal cardiovascular outcomes of hypertensive patients taking nebivolol with those taking the nonvasodilatory beta blockers metoprolol and atenolol.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of hypertensive adults in the University of Colorado health system, without preceding diagnosis of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease. The primary outcome was composite incident heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, angina, or coronary revascularization. Mahalanobis 1:2 distance matching and Cox proportional hazards regression was used. Matching and regression variables included baseline demographics, socioeconomic factors, medical insurance type, prescribing provider type, cardiovascular risk factors, Charlson comorbidity index, other medications, and follow-up duration.

RESULTS

After matching, patients were predominantly women (54%, 3085 of 5705) and non-Hispanic Caucasian (79%, 4534 of 5705), with median age of 58. In matched Cox regression analysis, nebivolol was associated with 17% reduction in incident cardiovascular events compared with all nonvasodilatory beta blockers [hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.94, P  = 0.004], and 24% reduction compared with metoprolol (hazard ratio 0.76, CI 0.66-0.87, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The vasodilatory beta blocker nebivolol was associated with reduced incident cardiovascular events compared with nonvasodilatory beta blockers. Additional study of other beta blockers is necessary to determine if this is a vasodilatory beta blocker class effect or is specific to nebivolol.

http://links.lww.com/HJH/B916.

Nebivolol/valsartan combination for the treatment of hypertension: a review

Nebivolol (N) is a β₁-adrenoreceptor antagonist that is approved for treatment of hypertension in the USA. Effective treatment of hypertension is becoming an increasingly difficult process that often requires multiple drug combinations to meet target guidelines. This has resulted in the increasing introduction of multidrug single-pill combinations (SPCs) to facilitate cost and compliance issues. Some of the SPCs have added valsartan (V), an angiotensin receptor blocker, which is an increasingly advocated antihypertensive class. Pharmacological profiles of N and V, alone and combined, are well characterized. In 2007, the SPC of N and V, 5 and 80 mg, respectively, was approved by the US FDA for treatment of hypertension. This paper will summarize and update key issues in pharmacology, clinical use and benefit.

Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?

Since noninvasive central blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are readily available, central BP has gained growing attention regarding its clinical application in the management of hypertension. The disagreement between central and peripheral BP has long been recognized. Some previous studies showed that noninvasive central BP may be better than the conventional brachial BP in association with target organ damages and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Recent studies further suggest that the central BP strategy for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension may be more cost-effective than the conventional strategy, and guidance of hypertension management with central BP may result in less use of medications to achieve BP control. Despite the use of central BP being promising, more randomized controlled studies comparing central BP-guided therapeutic strategies with conventional care for cardiovascular events reduction are required because noninvasive central and brachial BP measures are conveniently available. In this brief review, the rationale supporting the utility of central BP in clinical practice and relating challenges are summarized.