Effect of Denosumab on Glucose Homeostasis in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors: A Pilot Study

Cardiometabolic Effects of Denosumab in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer Receiving Estradiol Suppression: RCT

CONTEXT

Menopause is associated with changes in musculoskeletal, body composition, and metabolic parameters that may be amplified in premenopausal women receiving estradiol suppression for breast cancer. Denosumab offsets deleterious skeletal effects of estradiol suppression and has been reported to have effects on body composition and metabolic parameters in preclinical and observational studies, but evidence from double-blind randomized controlled trials is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of denosumab on body composition and metabolic parameters.

METHODS

In a prespecified secondary analysis of a 12-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 68 premenopausal women with breast cancer initiating ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibition were randomized to denosumab 60-mg or placebo administered at baseline and 6 months. Outcome measures were total and regional fat and lean mass (DXA), body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumference, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, and lipid profile. Using a mixed model, between-group mean adjusted differences over time are reported.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, relative to placebo, android and gynoid fat mass decreased in the denosumab group (-266 g [95% CI -453 to -79], P = .02, and -452 g [-783 to -122], P = .03, respectively). Total fat mass and waist circumference were lower in the denosumab group but not significantly (-1792 g [-3346 to -240], P = .08 and (- 3.77 cm [-6.76 to -0.79], P = .06, respectively). No significant treatment effects were detected in lean mass, BMI, hip circumference, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, or lipid profile.

CONCLUSION

In premenopausal women receiving estradiol suppression, denosumab decreases some measures of fat mass with no detectable effects on other measures of body composition or metabolic parameters.

RANKL inhibition: a new target of treating diabetes mellitus?

Accumulating evidence demonstrates the link between glucose and bone metabolism. The receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL)/the receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) axis is an essential signaling axis maintaining the balance between bone resorption and bone formation. In recent years, it has been found that RANKL and RANK are distributed not only in bone but also in the liver, muscle, adipose tissue, pancreas, and other tissues that may influence glucose metabolism. Some scholars have suggested that the blockage of the RANKL signaling may protect islet β-cell function and prevent diabetes; simultaneously, there also exist different views that RANKL can improve insulin resistance through inducing the beige adipocyte differentiation and increase energy expenditure. Currently, the results of the regulatory effect on glucose metabolism of RANKL remain conflicting. Denosumab (Dmab), a fully human monoclonal antibody that can bind to RANKL and prevent osteoclast formation, is a commonly used antiosteoporosis drug. Recent basic studies have found that Dmab seems to regulate glucose homeostasis and β-cell function in humanized mice or in vitro human β-cell models. Besides, some clinical data have also reported the glucometabolic effects of Dmab, however, with limited and inconsistent results. This review mainly describes the impact of the RANKL signaling pathway on glucose metabolism and summarizes clinical evidence that links Dmab and DM to seek a new therapeutic strategy for diabetes.

Beneficial effects of denosumab on muscle performance in patients with low BMD: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study

This study examined the effects of denosumab compared to bisphosphonates and vitamin D alone on muscle performance in patients with low BMD. While grip force improved in both the denosumab and bisphosphonate group, a superior increase in chair rising test force was observed in the denosumab group.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the anti-resorptive agent denosumab (Dmab) on upper and lower limb muscle performance compared to bisphosphonate (BP) treatment and vitamin D supplementation alone (i.e., basic therapy) in patients with low BMD.

METHODS

This retrospective, propensity score-matched (sex, age, BMI, follow-up time) cohort study included 150 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients receiving basic (n = 60), BP (n = 30) or Dmab (n = 60) therapy. All patients underwent a musculoskeletal assessment at baseline and follow-up, including DXA, laboratory bone metabolism parameters, grip force, and chair rising test mechanography. Mean annual percentage changes were calculated and compared between study groups.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up period of 17.6 ± 9.0 months, a significantly higher increase in grip force in both the Dmab (p < 0.001) and BP group (p = 0.001) compared to the vitamin D group was observed (vitamin D =  - 6.1 ± 10.2%; BP =  + 0.8 ± 8.2%; Dmab =  + 5.1 ± 25.5%). The Dmab group showed a significantly higher increase in chair rising test force compared to the BP group (vitamin D =  + 5.8 ± 12.7%; BP =  + 0.9 ± 8.6%; Dmab =  + 8.2 ± 14.4%; Dmab vs. BP p = 0.03). Neither the changes in BMD nor in bone metabolic parameters were associated with changes in muscle performance.

CONCLUSION

Dmab resulted in increased muscle strength in the upper and lower limbs, indicating systemic rather than site-specific effects as compared to BP. Based on these findings, Dmab might be favored over other osteoporosis treatments in patients with low BMD and poor muscle strength.

Systemic effects of abnormal bone resorption on muscle, metabolism, and cognition

Skeletal tissue is dynamic, undergoing constant remodeling to maintain musculoskeletal integrity and balance in the human body. Recent evidence shows that apart from maintaining homeostasis in the local microenvironment, the skeleton systemically affects other tissues. Several cancer-associated and noncancer-associated bone disorders can disrupt the physiological homeostasis locally in the bone microenvironment and indirectly contribute to dysregulation of systemic body function. The systemic effects of bone on the regulation of distant organ function have not been widely explored. Recent evidence suggests that bone can interact with skeletal muscle, pancreas, and brain by releasing factors from mineralized bone matrix. Currently available bone-targeting therapies such as bisphosphonates and denosumab inhibit bone resorption, decrease morbidity associated with bone destruction, and improve survival. Bisphosphonates have been a standard treatment for bone metastases, osteoporosis, and cancer treatment-induced bone diseases. The extraskeletal effects of bisphosphonates on inhibition of tumor growth are known. However, our knowledge of the effects of bisphosphonates on muscle weakness, hyperglycemia, and cognitive defects is currently evolving. To be able to identify the molecular link between bone and distant organs during abnormal bone resorption and then treat these abnormalities and prevent their systemic effects could improve survival benefits. The current review highlights the link between bone resorption and its systemic effects on muscle, pancreas, and brain.

Denosumab improves glucose parameters in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Receptor activator of NF-κβ ligand (RANKL) is crucial for the development of hepatic insulin resistance and poor glucose uptake; therefore, inhibiting RANKL with Denosumab could improve fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and insulin (FPI).

Methods

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effects of Denosumab on glycemic parameters. PubMed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, and LILACS databases were searched for studies that investigated the effect of Denosumab on FPG, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), FPI, and Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA1-IR). The pooled standard difference in means (SDM) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. The results were stratified into (1) Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT) and (2) Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT).

Results

Six publications (1203 participants) were included. There was a significant association between Denosumab and FPG (SDM = -0.388, 95%CI: -0.705 to -0.070, p = .017) and with HOMA1-IR (SDM = -0.223, 95%CI: -0.388 to -0.058, p = .008), but not for HbA1c and FPI. When stratified by glucose tolerance, the association between Denosumab and FPG, HbA1c, and HOMA1-IR was present for the IGT group. Lastly, Denosumab had a time-dependent effect on HbA1c (slope = -0.037, 95%CI: -0.059 to -0.015, p < .005).

Conclusions

Denosumab significantly improved glycemic parameters. This outcome was more prominent for subjects with compromised glucose tolerance, positing that Denosumab can be used as a treatment to improve glucose metabolism for persons with pre-diabetes and diabetes.

The Impact of Antiosteoporotic Drugs on Glucose Metabolism and Fracture Risk in Diabetes: Good or Bad News?

Osteoporosis and diabetes mellitus represent global health problems due to their high, and increasing with aging, prevalence in the general population. Osteoporosis can be successfully treated with both antiresorptive and anabolic drugs. While these drugs are clearly effective in reducing the risk of fracture in patients with postmenopausal and male osteoporosis, it is still unclear whether they may have the same efficacy in patients with diabetic osteopathy. Furthermore, as bone-derived cytokines (osteokines) are able to influence glucose metabolism, it is conceivable that antiosteoporotic drugs may have an effect on glycemic control through their modulation of bone turnover that affects the osteokines’ release. These aspects are addressed in this narrative review by means of an unrestricted computerized literature search in the PubMed database. Our findings indicate a balance between good and bad news. Active bone therapies and their modulation of bone turnover do not appear to play a clinically significant role in glucose metabolism in humans. Moreover, there are insufficient data to clarify whether there are any differences in the efficacy of antiosteoporotic drugs on fracture incidence between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with osteoporosis. Although more studies are required for stronger recommendations to be issued, bisphosphonates appear to be the first-line drug for treatment of osteoporosis in diabetic patients, while denosumab seems preferable for older patients, particularly for those with impaired renal function, and osteoanabolic agents should be reserved for patients with more severe forms of osteoporosis.