Nerve Repair and Orthodromic and Antidromic Nerve Grafts: An Experimental Comparative Study in Rabbit

Bioelectronic Medicine: a multidisciplinary roadmap from biophysics to precision therapies

Bioelectronic Medicine stands as an emerging field that rapidly evolves and offers distinctive clinical benefits, alongside unique challenges. It consists of the modulation of the nervous system by precise delivery of electrical current for the treatment of clinical conditions, such as post-stroke movement recovery or drug-resistant disorders. The unquestionable clinical impact of Bioelectronic Medicine is underscored by the successful translation to humans in the last decades, and the long list of preclinical studies. Given the emergency of accelerating the progress in new neuromodulation treatments (i.e., drug-resistant hypertension, autoimmune and degenerative diseases), collaboration between multiple fields is imperative. This work intends to foster multidisciplinary work and bring together different fields to provide the fundamental basis underlying Bioelectronic Medicine. In this review we will go from the biophysics of the cell membrane, which we consider the inner core of neuromodulation, to patient care. We will discuss the recently discovered mechanism of neurotransmission switching and how it will impact neuromodulation design, and we will provide an update on neuronal and glial basis in health and disease. The advances in biomedical technology have facilitated the collection of large amounts of data, thereby introducing new challenges in data analysis. We will discuss the current approaches and challenges in high throughput data analysis, encompassing big data, networks, artificial intelligence, and internet of things. Emphasis will be placed on understanding the electrochemical properties of neural interfaces, along with the integration of biocompatible and reliable materials and compliance with biomedical regulations for translational applications. Preclinical validation is foundational to the translational process, and we will discuss the critical aspects of such animal studies. Finally, we will focus on the patient point-of-care and challenges in neuromodulation as the ultimate goal of bioelectronic medicine. This review is a call to scientists from different fields to work together with a common endeavor: accelerate the decoding and modulation of the nervous system in a new era of therapeutic possibilities.

Retrograde peripheral nerve regeneration from sensory to motor pathways in rats: a new experimental concept in nerve repair

BACKGROUND

The polarity of nerve grafts does not interfere with axon growth. Our goal was to investigate whether axons can regenerate in a retrograde fashion within sensory pathways and then extend into motor pathways, leading to muscle reinnervation.

METHODS

Fifty-four rats were randomized into four groups. In Group 1, the ulnar nerve was connected end-to-end to the superficial radial nerve after neurectomy of the radial nerve in the axilla. In Group 2, the ulnar nerve was connected end-to-end to the radial nerve distal to the humerus; the radial nerve then was divided in the axilla. In Group 3, the radial nerve was divided in the axilla, but no nerve reconstruction was performed. In Group 4, the radial nerve was crushed in the axilla. Over 6 months, we behaviorally assessed the recovery of toe spread in the right operated-upon forepaw by lifting the rat by its tail and lowering it onto a flat surface. Six months after surgery, rats underwent reoperation, nerve transfers were tested electrophysiologically, and the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) was removed for histological evaluation.

RESULTS

Rats in the crush group recovered toe spread between 5 and 8 days after surgery. Rats with nerve transfers demonstrated electrophysiological and histological findings of nerve regeneration but no behavioral recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulnar nerve axons regrew into the superficial radial nerve and then into the PIN to reinnervate the extensor digitorum communis. We were unable to demonstrate behavioral recovery because rats cannot readapt to cross-nerve transfer.

Successful retrograde regeneration using a sensory branch for motor nerve transfer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to test whether regenerating motor axons from a donor nerve can travel in a retrograde fashion using sensory branches to successfully reinnervate a motor nerve end organ.

METHODS

This study has two parts. In part I, rats (n = 30) were assigned to one of five groups for obturator nerve (ON)-to-femoral nerve transfer: group 1, ON-to-saphenous nerve (SN) distal stump; group 2, ON-to-SN proximal stump without femoral nerve proper (FNP) injury; group 3, ON-to-SN proximal stump with FNP crush injury; group 4, ON-to-SN proximal stump with FNP transection injury; and group 5, gold standard transfer, ON-to-motor femoral nerve (MFN) branch. At 8 weeks, retrograde labeling was done from the distal MFN, and the spinal cords were examined to assess the degree of obturator motor axon regeneration across the five groups. In part II, only group 4 was examined (n = 8). Through use of immunostaining and optical tissue clearing methods, the nerve transfer networks were cleared and imaged using light-sheet fluorescence microscopy to visualize the regeneration pathways in 2D and 3D models at 2- and 8-week time points.

RESULTS

Proximal FNP transection (group 4) enabled a significantly higher number of retrogradely regenerated motor axons compared with control groups 1-3. Moreover, group 4 had modest, but nonsignificant, superiority of motor neuron counts compared with the positive control group, group 5. Optical tissue clearing demonstrated that the axons traveled in a retrograde fashion from the recipient sensory branch to the FNP mixed stump, then through complex turns, down to distal branches. Immunostaining confirmed the tissue clearing findings and suggested perineurium disruption as a means by which axons could traverse across fascicular boundaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensory branches can transmit regenerating axons from donor nerves back to main mixed recipient nerves, then distally toward target organs. The extent of retrograde regeneration is markedly influenced by the type and severity of injury sustained by the recipient nerve. Using a sensory branch as a bridge for retrogradely regenerating axons can open new potential horizons in nerve repair surgery for severely injured mixed nerves.

A sciatic nerve gap-injury model in the rabbit

There has been an increased number of studies of nerve transection injuries with the sciatic nerve gap-injury model in the rabbit in the past 2 years. We wanted to define in greater detail what is needed to test artificial nerve guides in a sciatic nerve gap-injury model in the rabbit. We hope that this will help investigators to fully exploit the robust translational potential of the rabbit sciatic nerve gap-injury model in its capacity to test devices whose diameter and length are in the range of those commonly applied in hand and wrist surgery (diameter ranging between 2 and 4 mm; length up to 30 mm). We suggest that the rabbit model should replace the less translational rat model in nerve regeneration research. The rabbit sciatic model, however, requires an effective strategy to prevent and control self-mutilation of the foot in the postoperative period, and to prevent pressure ulcers.

Comparison between normal and reverse orientation of graft in functional and histomorphological outcomes after autologous nerve grafting: An experimental study in the mouse model

BACKGROUND

Autologous nerve grafting has been considered the gold standard for the treatment of irreparable nerve gaps. However, the choice of effective proximodistal orientation of autografts (normal or reversed) is controversial. Therefore, we compared functional and histological outcomes between normal and reversed orientations of autografts in a mouse sciatic nerve model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty C57BL/6J mice weighing 20-25 g were assigned to the donor, normally oriented autograft, and reverse-oriented autograft groups (n = 10 per group). A 10-mm section of the sciatic nerve was harvested from a donor mouse. Half the harvested nerve was grafted onto an irreparable gap in a recipient mouse using either a normal or reversed orientation. The sciatic functional index (SFI) was measured biweekly for up to 12 weeks postoperatively. Morphological analysis was performed using immunofluorescence staining for neurofilament (NF) and myelin protein zero (P0) in cross-sectional and whole-mount nerve preparations in 12 weeks postoperatively. Additionally, morphological analysis of the tibialis anterior muscle was performed using hematoxylin and eosin staining. NF or P0-expressing axons were counted and cross-sectional area (CSA) and minimum Feret's diameter of myofibers were measured.

RESULTS

The SFI recovered gradually up to 12 weeks after autografting, but there were no significant differences in the SFI between the normal and reversed orientations. The number of NF-expressing axons in center of graft was significantly higher in the normal orientation than in the reversed orientation (P < .05). However, there were no significant differences in the number and mean intensity of P0-expressing axons between the orientations. The CSA of myofibers was significantly larger in the normal orientation than in the reversed orientation (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Normally oriented autografts promote axonal regrowth and prevent neurogenic muscular atrophy compared with reverse-oriented autografts. However, despite these positive histomorphometric effects, the proximodistal orientation of the autograft does not affect functional outcomes.

Nerve grafts in head and neck reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews recent literature on repair of peripheral nerve injuries in the head and neck with a focus on autografts, allografts, nerve conduits, and technical considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Contemporary nerve grafting techniques offer the potential to improve peripheral nerve outcomes and reduce donor site morbidity. A variety of donor nerves autografts have been described that offer favorable outcomes for segmental reconstruction of facial nerve defects. Recent studies have demonstrated promising results in repair of inferior alveolar nerve injuries with human allografts. Animal models describe successful reinnervation of small defects with neural conduits. The latest data do not favor protocolled nerve graft polarity or use of a motor versus sensory donor nerves.

SUMMARY

Interposition nerve grafting is the gold standard for repair of peripheral nerve injuries when a tension-free primary neurorrhaphy is not possible. Autografts are the work-horse for the majority of head and neck neural defects, however, can result in some degree of donor site morbidity. Recent developments in allografting and neural conduits have the potential to further diversify the head and neck reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium. It is unclear if nerve graft makeup or polarity affect functional outcome.