Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy in a Child Receiving Chronic Hemodialysis

Anterior and posterior ischemic optic neuropathy in a child with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) is exceedingly rare in children on dialysis, resulting from poor perfusion of the optic nerve, and presents as sudden acute painless vision loss.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

We report the case of a 3-year-old male with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD 5) due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) status post-bilateral nephrectomy on chronic hemodialysis who had acute loss of vision several hours after a hemodialysis session. Earlier that day, he had a drop in blood pressure intra-dialysis to 89/67 mmHg, with at home blood pressures ranging 90/60 to 150/100 mmHg. The patient was treated with tight blood pressure control to maintain blood flow and prevent blood pressure lability, received high-dose corticosteroids with a corticosteroid taper, and placed on high-dose erythropoietin for neuroprotective effect. He regained partial vision beginning approximately 1 month after presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The exact cause of our patient's simultaneous bilateral anterior and posterior ION, confirmed via MRI and fundoscopic examination, is unclear; however, is likely secondary to a combination of fluctuating blood pressure, anemia, anephric status, and hemodialysis. This highlights the need for close blood pressure monitoring, management of anemia, and more diligent ophthalmologic screening in pediatric patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Daily practice evaluation of the paediatric set of a next-generation long-term haemodialysis machine

BACKGROUND

From 2006 to 2020, 24% of children starting haemodialysis in France weighed < 20 kg. Most new-generation long-term haemodialysis machines do not propose paediatric lines anymore but Fresenius has validated two devices for use in children above 10 kg. Our aim was to compare the daily use of these two devices in children < 20 kg.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center evaluation of daily practice with Fresenius 6008® machines, and low-volume paediatric sets (83 mL), as compared to 5008® machines with paediatric lines (108 mL). Each child was treated randomly with both generators.

RESULTS

A total of 102 online haemodiafiltration sessions were performed over 4 weeks in five children (median body weight 12.0 [range 11.5-17.0] kg). Arterial aspiration and venous pressures were maintained respectively over - 200 mmHg and under 200 mmHg. For all children, blood flow and volume treated per session were lower with 6008® vs. 5008® (p < 0.001), median difference between the two devices being 21%. In the four children treated in post-dilution mode, substituted volume was lower with 6008® (p < 0.001, median difference: 21%). Effective dialysis time was not different between the two generators; however, the difference between total duration of session and dialysis effective time was slightly higher (p < 0.05) with 6008® for three patients, due to treatment interruptions.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that children between 11 and 17 kg should be treated with paediatric lines on 5008® if possible. They advocate for modification of the 6008 paediatric set to decrease resistance to blood flow. The possibility to use 6008® with paediatric lines in children below 10 kg deserves further studies.