1
|
Agard E, Levron A, Billant J, Douma I, Dot C. Comparison of refractive outcomes obtained with two swept-source OCT-based optical biometers after cataract surgery: A study of 152 eyes. J Fr Ophtalmol 2024; 47:104186. [PMID: 38663226 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare two swept-source OCT optical biometers, the Anterion® (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) and the IOLMaster 700® (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), in the analysis of biometric data, intraocular lens (IOL) calculation and postoperative spherical equivalent predictability. METHODS This was a real-life, single-center, retrospective study including 152 eyes of 81 consecutive patients referred for cataract surgery. All patients were examined with the IOLMaster 700® and the Anterion®. Biometric data (axial length [AL], anterior chamber depth [ACD], mean keratometry [Km], K1 [flat keratometry], K2 [steep keratometry] and axis, TK1 [flat total keratometry], TK2 [steep total keratometry], central pachymetry, lens thickness [LT], white-to-white distance [WTW]), IOL calculation with the SRK/T formula, and postoperative refractive outcome at 1 month were compared. RESULTS All biometric measurements were significantly different between the two biometers. Correlations were excellent for AL, pachymetry, ACD, LT and keratometry measurements, and for the IOL calculation (r>0.96, intraclass correlation coefficient=1). The IOL power for emmetropia was similar between both biometers when the SRK/T formula was used (20.84±3.24D versus 20.86±3.29D, P=0.61). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent prediction error calculated using the SRK/T formula was 0.03±0.5D for the IOLMaster 700® versus 0.01±0.47D for the Anterion® (P=0.12). CONCLUSIONS This study showed excellent correlation and agreement for the biometric measurements and the IOL power calculation with the SRK/T formula between both biometers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Agard
- Department of Ophthalmology, Desgenettes Military Hospital, 108, boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France.
| | - A Levron
- Department of Ophthalmology, Desgenettes Military Hospital, 108, boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - J Billant
- Department of Ophthalmology, Desgenettes Military Hospital, 108, boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - I Douma
- Department of Ophthalmology, Desgenettes Military Hospital, 108, boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - C Dot
- Department of Ophthalmology, Desgenettes Military Hospital, 108, boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France; French Military Health Service Academy, Val de Grâce, Paris, France; FEBO (Fellow of European Board of Ophthalmology), France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lim H, Jang JH, Nam S, Lee K, Kim JY, Tchah H, Lee H. Refractive Predictability between Standard and Total Keratometry during the Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery with Monofocal Intraocular Lens with Enhanced Intermediate Function. KOREAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 2024; 38:9-16. [PMID: 38110185 PMCID: PMC10869425 DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2023.0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to compare the accuracy of the intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula using the standard keratometry (K) and total K (TK) during the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with a monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function using currently used formulas. METHODS A retrospective review of 125 eyes from 125 patients who had undergone FLACS with implantation of monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function was conducted. The predicted refractive power was calculated using an optical biometer (IOLmaster 700) according to the K and TK in the Barrett Universal II, SRK/T, Haigis, and Holladay 2 formulas. Absolute prediction error (APE) obtained from the actual postoperative refractive outcomes and the refractive error predicted in each formula was compared one month after surgery. RESULTS Mean APE ranged between 0.29 and 0.39 diopters (D) regardless of the calculation formula and the method of measuring corneal curvature. Significant differences were observed in the APE from the four formulas and the two keratometric measurements (p = 0.014). In a total of 125 eyes from 125 patients, the mean APE was lowest with the Barrett Universal II formula. Across all formulas, both the mean APE and the median APE tended to be lower for K than for TK, although there was no significant difference. Approximately 70% to 80% of the patients were included within 0.5 D of the refractive error across all formulas. The percentage of eyes within 0.5 D of APE outcomes was not statistically different between the K and TK data when using each formula. CONCLUSIONS Keratometric measurements considering the poster corneal curvature did not show any additional advantages when implanting the monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function during the FLACS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunah Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Hyuck Jang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sanghyu Nam
- Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Koeun Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Yong Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hungwon Tchah
- Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hun Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma Y, Xiong R, Liu Z, Young CA, Wu Y, Zheng D, Zhang X, Jin G. Network Meta-analysis of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula Accuracy in 1016 Eyes With Long Axial Length. Am J Ophthalmol 2024; 257:178-186. [PMID: 37726043 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review the literature and quantitatively synthesize the currently available evidence to compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens calculation formulas in eyes with long axial length (AL). DESIGN Network meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published between January 2000 and June 2022. Included were prospective or retrospective clinical studies reporting the following outcomes in cataract patients with long AL (ie, ≥26 mm): percentage of eyes with a prediction error (PE) within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 diopters (D). Network meta-analysis was conducted using R software (version 4.2.1). RESULTS Ten prospective or retrospective clinical studies, including 1016 eyes and 11 calculation formulas, were identified. A traditional meta-analysis showed that for the percentage of eyes with PE within ±0.25 and ±0.50 D, the Olsen, Kane, and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) all had insignificantly higher percentages compared with others. Considering the percentage of eyes with PE within ±1.00 D, the original and modified Wang-Koch adjustment formulas for Holladay 1 (H1-WK and H1-MWK) and EVO formulas showed superiority, but the difference was insignificant. This network meta-analysis revealed that compared with the widely used Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula, the Olsen, Kane, and EVO formulas had higher percentages of eyes with PE within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 D (all odds ratios >1 but P >.05). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) values for the percentage of eyes with PE within ±0.25 D, the Olsen (96.4%), Kane (77.5%), and EVO (75.9%) formulas had the highest probability of being in the top 3 of the 11 formulas. CONCLUSIONS The Olsen, Kane, and EVO formulas may perform better than others in calculating IOL power in eyes with long AL. Nevertheless, there is still considerable uncertainty in this regard and the accuracy of these formulas in highly myopic eyes should be confirmed in studies based on large multicenter registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiyuan Ma
- From the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (Y.M., R.X., Z.L., Y.W., D.Z., X.Z., G.J.), Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruilin Xiong
- From the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (Y.M., R.X., Z.L., Y.W., D.Z., X.Z., G.J.), Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenzhen Liu
- From the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (Y.M., R.X., Z.L., Y.W., D.Z., X.Z., G.J.), Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Yue Wu
- From the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (Y.M., R.X., Z.L., Y.W., D.Z., X.Z., G.J.), Guangzhou, China
| | - Danying Zheng
- From the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (Y.M., R.X., Z.L., Y.W., D.Z., X.Z., G.J.), Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinyu Zhang
- From the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (Y.M., R.X., Z.L., Y.W., D.Z., X.Z., G.J.), Guangzhou, China
| | - Guangming Jin
- From the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University (Y.M., R.X., Z.L., Y.W., D.Z., X.Z., G.J.), Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Belov DF, Danilenko EV, Nikolaenko VP, Potemkin VV. [Evaluation of the accuracy of modern intraocular lens calculation formulas when optical biometry is not possible]. Vestn Oftalmol 2024; 140:34-39. [PMID: 38742496 DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202414002134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluates the accuracy of modern intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas using axial length (AL) data obtained by ultrasound biometry (UBM) compared to the third-generation SRK/T calculator. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 230 patients (267 eyes) with severe lens opacities that prevented optical biometry, who underwent phacoemulsification (PE) with IOL implantation. IOL power calculation according to the SRK/T formula was based on AL and anterior chamber depth obtained by UBM (Tomey Biometer Al-100) and keratometry on the Topcon KR 8800 autorefractometer. To adapt AL for new generation calculators - Barrett Universal II (BUII), Hill RBF ver. 3.0 (RBF), Kane and Ladas Super Formula (LSF) - the retinal thickness (0.20 mm) was added to the axial length determined by UBM, and then the optical power of the artificial lens was calculated. The mean error and its modulus value were used as criteria for the accuracy of IOL calculation. RESULTS A significant difference (p=0.008) in the mean IOL calculation error was found between the formulas. Pairwise analysis revealed differences between SRK/T (-0.32±0.58 D) and other formulas - BUII (-0.16±0.52 D; p=0.014), RBF (-0.17±0.51 D; p=0.024), Kane (-0.17±0.52 D; p=0.029), but not with the LSF calculator (-0.19±0.53 D; p=0.071). No significant differences between the formulas were found in terms of mean error modulus (p=0.238). New generation calculators showed a more frequent success in hitting target refraction (within ±1.00 D in more than 95% of cases) than the SRK/T formula (86%). CONCLUSION The proposed method of adding 0.20 mm to the AL determined by UBM allows using this parameter in modern IOL calculation formulas and improving the refractive results of PE, especially in eyes with non-standard anterior segment structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D F Belov
- Saint Petersburg Multifield Hospital No. 2, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - E V Danilenko
- Medical Military Academy named after S.M. Kirov, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - V P Nikolaenko
- Saint Petersburg Multifield Hospital No. 2, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - V V Potemkin
- Saint Petersburg Multifield Hospital No. 2, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Qin Y, Liu L, Mao Y, Ding Y, Ye S, Sun A, Wu M. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Based on Total Keratometry in Patients With Flat and Steep Corneas. Am J Ophthalmol 2023; 247:103-110. [PMID: 36375590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the accuracy of the current intraocular lens power calculation formulas using standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) data in patients with flat and steep corneas. DESIGN Retrospective consecutive cross-sectional study. METHODS An optical biometer with swept-source optical coherence tomography was used in this retrospective study. The standard deviation (SD), mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the proportion of eyes with prediction error (PE) within ±0.25 diopter (D), ±0.5 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D were calculated to evaluate the refractive outcomes of each formula. RESULTS A total of 231 eyes from 231 patients were included. In the entire study cohort, the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) formula using TK data showed the lowest SD (0.383) and MAE (0.30) and the highest percentage of cases with a PE within ±0.5 D (81.4%). In the flat keratometry group, the EVO (P = .042), Haigis (P = .043), Hoffer Q (P = .038) and Holladay 1 (P = .013) formulas using TK data had significantly lower SD than using K data. The EVO formula using TK data showed the lowest SD (0.357) and MAE (0.28). In the steep keratometry group, the Hoffer Q (P = .036) and SRK/T (P = .029) formulas using TK data had significantly lower SD than using K data. The BUII TK formula showed the lowest SD (0.431), MedAE (0.26), and MAE (0.32). CONCLUSION The TK data set showed a better trend of refractive outcomes, especially in the flat and steep keratometry groups. EVO (TK) and BUII TK formulas were suggested for eyes with K values lower than 42 D and K values higher than 46 D, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyan Qin
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liangping Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Mao
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yujie Ding
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shaobi Ye
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ao Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mingxing Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China..
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Monera Lucas CE, Escolano Serrano J, Tarazona Jaimes C, Romero Valero D, Moya Martínez A, Martínez Toldos JJ. Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry. ARCHIVOS DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE OFTALMOLOGIA 2022; 97:670-675. [PMID: 36068133 DOI: 10.1016/j.oftale.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the reproducibility in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and its comparability with an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer. DESIGN An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. METHODS 45 right eyes of 45 patients diagnosed with cataract were included. Three successive biometric measurements with Anterion and one with Lenstar LS900 were performed on each patient. The following variables were collected: axial length (AXL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), flat K (K1), steep K (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT) and white-to-white distance (WTW). The intrasubject standard deviation (Sw) and the coefficient of Pearson "R" were calculated in order to assess the repeatability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were obtained to evaluate the comparability between devices. A Bland-Altman plot was performed for each variable. RESULTS The coefficient of Pearson was excellent and statistically significant in the evaluation of the repeatability in all the variables. The highest values were 0.987 (AXL), 0.983 (CCT) and 0.942 (ACD). There were no statically significant differences between repeated measurements with Anterion in all the parameters. The ICC and CCC were excellent in the evaluation of AXL, CCT and ACD, and were also good in regard to K1, K2, LT and WTW. CONCLUSIONS Performing biometry with the SS-OCT Anterion is a reliable and reproducible procedure, and it is comparable with the Lenstar LS900.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Monera Lucas
- Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain; Programa de Doctorado en Salud Pública, Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Alicante, Spain.
| | - J Escolano Serrano
- Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - C Tarazona Jaimes
- Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain; Programa de Doctorado en Salud Pública, Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - D Romero Valero
- Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - A Moya Martínez
- Unidad de Bioestadística, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - J J Martínez Toldos
- Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yin S, Guo C, Qiu K, Ng TK, Li Y, Du Y, Chen B, Wang H, Zhang M. Assessment of the influence of keratometry on intraocular lens calculation formulas in long axial length eyes. Int Ophthalmol 2022; 42:3211-3219. [PMID: 36057757 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02322-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hyperopic surprises tend to occur in axial myopic eyes and other factors including corneal curvature have rarely been analyzed in cataract surgery, especially in eyes with long axial length (≥ 26.0 mm). Thus, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the influence of keratometry on four different formulas (SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, Haigis and Olsen) in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for long eyes. METHODS Retrospective case series. A total of 180 eyes with axial length (AL) ≥ 26.0 mm were divided into 3 keratometry (K) groups: K ≤ 42.0 D (Flat), K ≥ 46.0 D (Steep), 42.0 < K < 46.0 D (Average), and all the eyes were underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with Rayner (Hove, UK) 920H IOL implantation. Prediction errors (PE) were compared between different formulas to assess the accuracy of different formulas. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with the PE. RESULTS The mean absolute error was higher for all evaluated formulas in Steep group (ranging from 0.66 D to 1.02 D) than the Flat (0.34 D to 0.67 D) and Average groups (0.40 D to 0.74D). The median absolute errors predicted by Olsen formula were significantly lower than that predicted by Haigis formula (0.42 D versus 0.85 D in Steep and 0.29 D versus 0.69 D in Average) in Steep and Average groups (P = 0.012, P < 0.001, respectively). And the Olsen formula demonstrated equal accuracy to the Barrett II formula in Flat and Average groups. The predictability of the SRK/T formula was affected by the AL and K, while the predictability of Olsen and Haigis formulas was affected by the AL only. CONCLUSIONS Steep cornea has more influence on the accuracy of IOL power calculation than the other corneal shape in long eyes. Overall, both the Olsen and Barrett Universal II formulas are recommended in long eyes with unusual keratometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengjie Yin
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Chengyao Guo
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kunliang Qiu
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Tsz Kin Ng
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Yuancun Li
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yali Du
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Bingyao Chen
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Hongxi Wang
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Mingzhi Zhang
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guo C, Yin S, Qiu K, Zhang M. Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 29.0 mm. Int Ophthalmol 2022; 42:2029-2038. [PMID: 35536455 PMCID: PMC9085560 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-02194-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate and compare the accuracy of six different formulas (Emmetropia Verifying Optical version 2.0, Kane, SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, Haigis and Olsen) in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for extremely long eyes. METHODS Retrospective case-series. Seventy-three eyes with axial length (AL) ≥ 29.0 mm and underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with Rayner (Hove, UK) 920H IOL implantation from January 2018 to March 2020 were included. Prediction errors (PE) were calculated and compared between different formulas to evaluate the accuracy of formulas. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with the PE. RESULTS The Kane formula had mean prediction error close to zero (- 0.01 ± 0.51 D, P = 0.841), whereas the EVO 2.0, SRK/T, Barrett Universal II, Haigis and Olsen formulas produced hyperopic outcomes (all P < 0.001). The median absolute error [inter-quartile range] produced by the EVO 2.0, Kane, Barrett Universal II and Olsen formulas showed no significant difference (0.33 D [0.48], 0.30 D [0.44], 0.34 D [0.39], 0.29 D [0.37], respectively, pairwise comparison P > 0.05), but was significantly lower than that of the SRK/T and Haigis formulas (0.85 D [0.66], 0.80 D [0.54], respectively, pairwise comparison P < 0.001). The AL and the PE produced by the SRK/T formula were significantly positively correlated in extremely myopic eyes (β = 0.248, P < 0.001), whereas the trend was not demonstrated in other formulas. CONCLUSIONS For cataract patients with axial length greater than 29.0 mm, the accuracy of the EVO 2.0, Kane, Barrett Universal II and Olsen formulas is comparable and significantly better than that of the SRK/T and Haigis formulas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengyao Guo
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shengjie Yin
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Kunliang Qiu
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Mingzhi Zhang
- Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, North Dongxia Road, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lukewich MK, Murtaza F, Somani S, Tam ES, Chiu HH. Comparison of Barrett Toric Calculations Using Measured and Predicted Posterior Corneal Astigmatism in Cataract Surgery Patients. Clin Ophthalmol 2022; 16:1739-1751. [PMID: 35673350 PMCID: PMC9167600 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s351011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark K Lukewich
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fahmeeda Murtaza
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sohel Somani
- William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Uptown Eye Specialists, Vaughan, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric S Tam
- William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Uptown Eye Specialists, Vaughan, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hannah H Chiu
- William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Uptown Eye Specialists, Vaughan, Ontario, Canada
- Correspondence: Hannah H Chiu, Uptown Eye Specialists, 401-7900 Hurontario Street, Brampton, Ontario, L6Y 0P6, Canada, Tel +1 416 292-0330, Fax +1 416 292-0331, Email
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Development of a New Method for Calculating Intraocular Lens Power after Myopic Laser In Situ Keratomileusis by Combining the Anterior-Posterior Ratio of the Corneal Radius of the Curvature with the Double-K Method. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11030522. [PMID: 35159971 PMCID: PMC8837081 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: A new method, the Iida–Shimizu–Shoji (ISS) method, is proposed for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power that combines the anterior–posterior ratio of the corneal radius of the curvature after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to compare the predictability of the method with that of other IOL formulas after LASIK. Methods: The estimated corneal power before LASIK (Kpre) in the double-K method was 43.86 D according to the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery calculator, and the K readings of the IOL master were used as the K values after LASIK (Kpost). The factor for correcting the target refractive value (correcting factor [C-factor]) was calculated from the correlation between the anterior–posterior ratio of the corneal radius of the curvature and the refractive error obtained using this method for 30 eyes of 30 patients. Results: Fifty-nine eyes of 59 patients were included. The mean values of the numerical and absolute prediction errors obtained using the ISS method were −0.02 ± 0.45 diopter (D) and 0.35 ± 0.27 D, respectively. The prediction errors using the ISS method were within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 D in 49.2%, 76.3%, and 96.6% of the eyes, respectively. The predictability of the ISS method was comparable to or better than some of the other formulas. Conclusions: The ISS method is useful for calculating the IOL power in eyes treated with cataract surgery after LASIK.
Collapse
|
11
|
Arrigo A, Gambaro G, Fasce F, Aragona E, Figini I, Bandello F. Quantitative biometric cutoffs for the choice of the intraocular lens power calculation formula for a recently introduced nondiffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021; 32:2949-2953. [PMID: 34859698 DOI: 10.1177/11206721211065551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to analyze biometry values cutoffs for the choice of the best intraocular lens power calculation formula for AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens. METHODS The study was designed as interventional case series with 3 months of follow-up. Intraocular lens power calculation formulas included Barrett Universal II and SRK/T. The first was adopted for the intraocular lens power choice. The quantitative analysis focused on the identification of specific biometric cutoffs considering axial length, anterior chamber depth, and corneal powers. We included only the dominant eye in the statistical analysis. RESULTS One hundred and eight eyes of 54 patients (23 males; mean age 62 ± 5 years) with no ocular diseases were included. Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.3 ± 0.2 to 0.0 ± 0.0 logMAR. All the eyes reached spectacles-free far and intermediate visions; a spherical addition of + 1.0D was necessary to adjust near vision. We identified significant quantitative cutoffs based on axial length and anterior chamber depth. Barrett Universal II resulted the best formula for eyes disclosing an axial length >25 mm, whereas SRK/T turned out to be the best choice for the eyes characterized by an anterior chamber depth <2.8 mm. Our analysis disclosed an overall sensitivity of 0.8 and a specificity of 0.7 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Axial length and anterior chamber depth influence the choice of Barrett Universal II and SRK/T formulas. Quantitative biometric cutoffs may be useful to discriminate the best formula to be adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Arrigo
- Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Fasce
- Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Aragona
- Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Bandello
- Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rabinovich M, Aramburu Del Boz AM, Al-Khatib D, Genestier JP, Bovet J. Influence of Posterior Corneal Asphericity on Refractive Error of SRK-T and Barrett Formulas for Lucidis IOL. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; 240:683-688. [PMID: 34535025 DOI: 10.1055/a-1583-9723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the influence of posterior corneal asphericity on the refractive error using SRK-T and Barrett formulas for the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for Lucidis Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOL. SETTING This study was carried out at a tertiary ophthalmology center in Geneva, Switzerland. DESIGN A retrospective study. Medical records from all enrolled patients were analyzed and the following information was extracted retrospectively, over 1 month following surgery. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 75 eyes that underwent cataract surgery and were implanted with a Lucidis EDOF IOL. We measured the posterior corneal asphericity (Q value), axial length (AL), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) and then calculated the IOL power using SRK-T and Barrett formulas. RESULTS Seventy-five eyes were included, all of which had 1-month postoperative data. In the cohort, 32 eyes were from females (43%) and 43 from males (57%). The mean age of the study population was 73 ± 8.8 years. The mean AL was 23.5 ± 0.98 and the mean ACD was 3.13 ± 0.3. The mean posterior Q value was - 0.35 ± 0.2. In a regression analysis, we found a statistically significant relationship between the error in refraction prediction and the posterior Q value, irrespective of the formula used. The relationship between posterior corneal asphericity and the refraction prediction error was stronger for the Barrett II Universal formula than for the SRK-T formula. CONCLUSIONS Posterior corneal asphericity was correlated with the refractive error of calculation of both SRK-T and Barrett formulas, with a stronger correlation to the latter formula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jerome Bovet
- Ophthalmology, Clinique de l'Oeil Onex, Onex, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Morya AK, Tejaswini A, Janti SS. Commentary: Intraocular lens formulas for near perfect visual acuity - Search continues. Indian J Ophthalmol 2021; 69:2303. [PMID: 34427205 PMCID: PMC8544077 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_891_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind K Morya
- Department of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Antarvedi Tejaswini
- Department of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Siddharam S Janti
- Department of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Priji P, Jacob SC, Kalikivayi L, Kalikivayi V. Correlating Kane formula with existing intraocular lens formulae for corneal curvatures and axial lengths. Oman J Ophthalmol 2021; 14:94-99. [PMID: 34345143 PMCID: PMC8300291 DOI: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_62_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the predictability of the Kane formula in estimating postoperative refractive outcome with various corneal curvatures and axial lengths (ALs) besides comparing with existing intraocular lens (IOL) formulae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out among patients having uneventful cataract surgery at an eye hospital. A total of 50 eyes were considered for the study. The corresponding A-constant for the model of IOL implanted into the patient's eye was taken along with the actual power of IOL implanted and corresponding predicted power for the IOL power inserted were taken for all the chosen formulae and was termed as "Adjusted Predicted Refractive Power." This was compared with the actual refractive outcome and the absolute error (AE) was measured. The eyes were separated into groups in terms of corneal curvature as flat (<42D), medium (42D–46D), and steep (>46D) corneas. In terms of AL, it was grouped as short (≤22 mm), medium (>22.0–<24.0 mm), and long (>24.0 mm) eyes. RESULTS: The study included 50 eyes and the mean AE for all the selected formulae were calculated for each group. Over the entire corneal curvature range, none of the formulae showed any significance when compared with the Kane formula (P > 0.05). In short AL, SRK-T formula had a statistical significance over the Kane formula (P = 0.043), whereas no other group had any significance over the Kane formula in AL groups. CONCLUSION: The study shows, all formulae (SRK-T, Holladay1, Hoffer Q, Hill RBF, Barrett Universal II, Kane) are interchangeable to predict the IOL power for any of the corneal curvature and ALs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Priji
- Ahalia School of Optometry, Palakkad, Kerala, India
| | - Sajeev Cherian Jacob
- Ahalia School of Optometry, Palakkad, Kerala, India.,Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital, Palakkad, Kerala, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Priji P, Jacob SC, Kalikivayi L, Kalikivayi V. Correlating Kane formula with existing intraocular lens formulae for corneal curvatures and axial lengths. Oman J Ophthalmol 2021. [PMID: 34345143 DOI: 10.4103/eye.eye_62_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the predictability of the Kane formula in estimating postoperative refractive outcome with various corneal curvatures and axial lengths (ALs) besides comparing with existing intraocular lens (IOL) formulae. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out among patients having uneventful cataract surgery at an eye hospital. A total of 50 eyes were considered for the study. The corresponding A-constant for the model of IOL implanted into the patient's eye was taken along with the actual power of IOL implanted and corresponding predicted power for the IOL power inserted were taken for all the chosen formulae and was termed as "Adjusted Predicted Refractive Power." This was compared with the actual refractive outcome and the absolute error (AE) was measured. The eyes were separated into groups in terms of corneal curvature as flat (<42D), medium (42D-46D), and steep (>46D) corneas. In terms of AL, it was grouped as short (≤22 mm), medium (>22.0-<24.0 mm), and long (>24.0 mm) eyes. RESULTS The study included 50 eyes and the mean AE for all the selected formulae were calculated for each group. Over the entire corneal curvature range, none of the formulae showed any significance when compared with the Kane formula (P > 0.05). In short AL, SRK-T formula had a statistical significance over the Kane formula (P = 0.043), whereas no other group had any significance over the Kane formula in AL groups. CONCLUSION The study shows, all formulae (SRK-T, Holladay1, Hoffer Q, Hill RBF, Barrett Universal II, Kane) are interchangeable to predict the IOL power for any of the corneal curvature and ALs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Priji
- Ahalia School of Optometry, Palakkad, Kerala, India
| | - Sajeev Cherian Jacob
- Ahalia School of Optometry, Palakkad, Kerala, India
- Ahalia Foundation Eye Hospital, Palakkad, Kerala, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|