Optimal Design of Single-Cell Experiments within Temporally Fluctuating Environments

Biophysically interpretable inference of cell types from multimodal sequencing data

Multimodal, single-cell genomics technologies enable simultaneous measurement of multiple facets of DNA and RNA processing in the cell. This creates opportunities for transcriptome-wide, mechanistic studies of cellular processing in heterogeneous cell populations, such as regulation of cell fate by transcriptional stochasticity or tumor proliferation through aberrant splicing dynamics. However, current methods for determining cell types or 'clusters' in multimodal data often rely on ad hoc approaches to balance or integrate measurements, and assumptions ignoring inherent properties of the data. To enable interpretable and consistent cell cluster determination, we present meK-means (mechanistic K-means) which integrates modalities through a unifying model of transcription to learn underlying, shared biophysical states. With meK-means we can cluster cells with nascent and mature mRNA measurements, utilizing the causal, physical relationships between these modalities. This identifies shared transcription dynamics across cells, which induce the observed molecule counts, and provides an alternative definition for 'clusters' through the governing parameters of cellular processes.

Stochastic Modeling of Biophysical Responses to Perturbation

Recent advances in high-throughput, multi-condition experiments allow for genome-wide investigation of how perturbations affect transcription and translation in the cell across multiple biological entities or modalities, from chromatin and mRNA information to protein production and spatial morphology. This presents an unprecedented opportunity to unravel how the processes of DNA and RNA regulation direct cell fate determination and disease response. Most methods designed for analyzing large-scale perturbation data focus on the observational outcomes, e.g., expression; however, many potential transcriptional mechanisms, such as transcriptional bursting or splicing dynamics, can underlie these complex and noisy observations. In this analysis, we demonstrate how a stochastic biophysical modeling approach to interpreting high-throughout perturbation data enables deeper investigation of the 'how' behind such molecular measurements. Our approach takes advantage of modalities already present in data produced with current technologies, such as nascent and mature mRNA measurements, to illuminate transcriptional dynamics induced by perturbation, predict kinetic behaviors in new perturbation settings, and uncover novel populations of cells with distinct kinetic responses to perturbation.

Biophysically Interpretable Inference of Cell Types from Multimodal Sequencing Data

Multimodal, single-cell genomics technologies enable simultaneous capture of multiple facets of DNA and RNA processing in the cell. This creates opportunities for transcriptome-wide, mechanistic studies of cellular processing in heterogeneous cell types, with applications ranging from inferring kinetic differences between cells, to the role of stochasticity in driving heterogeneity. However, current methods for determining cell types or 'clusters' present in multimodal data often rely on ad hoc or independent treatment of modalities, and assumptions ignoring inherent properties of the count data. To enable interpretable and consistent cell cluster determination from multimodal data, we present meK-Means (mechanistic K-Means) which integrates modalities and learns underlying, shared biophysical states through a unifying model of transcription. In particular, we demonstrate how meK-Means can be used to cluster cells from unspliced and spliced mRNA count modalities. By utilizing the causal, physical relationships underlying these modalities, we identify shared transcriptional kinetics across cells, which induce the observed gene expression profiles, and provide an alternative definition for 'clusters' through the governing parameters of cellular processes.

Interpretable and tractable models of transcriptional noise for the rational design of single-molecule quantification experiments

The question of how cell-to-cell differences in transcription rate affect RNA count distributions is fundamental for understanding biological processes underlying transcription. Answering this question requires quantitative models that are both interpretable (describing concrete biophysical phenomena) and tractable (amenable to mathematical analysis). This enables the identification of experiments which best discriminate between competing hypotheses. As a proof of principle, we introduce a simple but flexible class of models involving a continuous stochastic transcription rate driving a discrete RNA transcription and splicing process, and compare and contrast two biologically plausible hypotheses about transcription rate variation. One assumes variation is due to DNA experiencing mechanical strain, while the other assumes it is due to regulator number fluctuations. We introduce a framework for numerically and analytically studying such models, and apply Bayesian model selection to identify candidate genes that show signatures of each model in single-cell transcriptomic data from mouse glutamatergic neurons.