Prevalence and Distribution of the Middle Mesial Canal in Mandibular First Molar Teeth of the Kerman Population: A CBCT Study

Prevalence of middle mesial canal using cone beam computed tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The presence of middle mesial canals in mandibular molars are not commonly encountered in daily practice. However, locating and debriding such anatomical variation during the endodontic therapy is essential to avoid endodontic failure. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the overall prevalence of middle mesial canals (MMC) in mandibular molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), to assess the influence of different gender on the prevalence of MMCs in mandibular molars and to describe the MMC configurations.

Methods

The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021238523). The main electronic databases were searched until February 2022 for prevalence studies on root/canal anatomy in mandibular molars using CBCT imaging, in addition to hand-searched scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals and grey literature. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. Egger's and Begg's tests and Pearson's chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.

Results

From 523 records, 488 studies were excluded after screening the title and abstract. 35 relevant studies were included for full-text assessment and 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of MMC out of the 19,256 teeth was 5.09% (95% CI: 2.894 to 7.784). The prevalence of MMC was 9.79% (95% CI: 4.296 to 17.224) in males and 13.96% (95% CI: 0.541 to 40.737) in females with a statistically significant difference of 4.16% (95% CI: 2.29 to 6.01). The most MMC configuration found in this review to be confluent with the mesiobuccal canal.

Conclusion

The results showed an overall 5.09% prevalence of MMC in mandibular molars, with a significantly high prevalence in female subjects. Additionally, this canal was found to be confluent with the mesiobuccal canal.

The Prevalence of Middle Mesial Canals in the Second Mandibular Molars of an Iranian Subpopulation: A Cross-Sectional CBCT Study

Background Missed additional canals are a common reason for the failure of root canal treatments. The prevalence of additional canals in molar teeth can vary because of ethnic differences. Hence, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and distribution of middle mesial canals (MMCs) in the second mandibular molars using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), for an adult population from Kerman in southeast Iran. Methodology De-identified retrospective provided CBCT scans from three private radiology centers in Kerman were reviewed (131 patients; 58 males (44.3%), 73 females (55.7%); age range: 13 to 54 years, mean age: 33). The presence of MMCs in mandibular second molars (222 teeth; 112 left and 110 right) was recorded, along with the morphology of the distal roots in the same teeth. Frequency data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Results The overall prevalence of MMC in the second mandibular molars was 2.3%. MMCs were found both unilaterally and bilaterally. More MMCs were found in females than males (2.7% vs. 1.7%), and on the left side (2.7% vs. 1.8%), but these differences were not statistically significant (p=1.0). There was no association between the existence of MMC in the mesial root and a second canal in the distal root of the same tooth. Conclusion Based on CBCT scans, the overall prevalence of MMC in mandibular second molars in this population was just below one in 44. Clinicians performing endodontic treatment on second molars should check for the presence of MMC so that this possible additional canal is not missed.

Endodontic Orthograde Retreatments: Challenges and Solutions

Endodontic orthograde retreatments are considered one of the possible treatment options in case of post-treatment diseases considering the promising results present in the literature. Despite this, a plethora of articles have been published on this topic, and drawing conclusions could be challenging. For this reason, this review aims to summarize the crucial points on each aspect of non-surgical endodontic retreatments, discussing and comparing the current protocols, techniques, materials, and indications. Taking into consideration data from the literature, in terms of diagnosis, CBCT should be considered the first choice, since it can thoroughly affect the diagnosis and treatment plan. Regarding the procedural phases, some conclusions can be drawn: when present, coronal restoration materials such as crowns, partial prostheses, post, and core should be removed; the use of magnification devices, ultrasonic instruments, and an in-depth interpretation of radiographic images with both 2D and 3D images are strongly recommended during the orifice location; additional protocols such as irrigants activation, ultrasonic cleaning, and rotary or reciprocating instrumentation of treated canals are strongly recommended for filling materials removal and to achieve a high-quality chemo-mechanical disinfection; perforations should be treated as soon as possible, and the material of choice to treat them is the MTA or other calcium-silicate-based repair materials; the presence of ledges does not intrinsically reduce the success rate of RCRts if properly managed; in case of instrument fragments, their removal should be considered as the first treatment option, however many variables should be considered to select the proper technique or consider the option of bypassing.

Prevalence of Middle Mesial Canal in Mandibular Molars of a Saudi Subpopulation: A Prospective Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

BACKGROUND

Root canal treatment is compromised when one or more root canals are left unmanaged, especially in the case of multirooted teeth. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has the advantage of clearly recognizing the anatomical structures without any blurring and superimposition. There are few studies that assess the middle mesial canal (MMC) prevalence in the Saudi population using CBCT imaging. Thus, the present study was conducted to assess the MMC prevalence in the first and second mandibular molars in the Saudi population using CBCT imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 616 patients and 1014 teeth were assessed. The mesial roots of the mandibular first and second molars were examined using CBCT to assess the presence of the MMC in both axial and coronal sections. The potential correlation between the prevalence of MMC was assessed with gender and age. The data collected were subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS version 20.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

RESULTS

The mean age was 34.39 ± 12.12 years, showing male predominance. A total of 2.6% and 0.2% cases of MMC were found in the first and second molars, respectively. A significant difference (p-value < 0.05) was observed among both genders in relation to age groups and the presence of MMC. MMC in the first molar was seen mainly in patients aged <20 years and only one case was reported with MMC in the second molar among patients aged 41-60 years.

CONCLUSION

A higher incidence of MMC was found in the first than the second mandibular molar. For accessing the MMC, the patient's age, high magnification, and troughing are some influential factors. In the future, clinical studies with long-term follow-ups are required to assess the influence of biomechanical preparation of MMC on the result of nonsurgical endodontic management in mandibular first as well as second molars.

Unveiling Hidden Canals: Middle Mesial Canal Prevalence in Mandibular First Molars Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis in Central India

Background The most frequent reason involving failure of root canal treatment in molar teeth is the inability to locate additional canals. While much research has been conducted on the morphology of mandibular molars, little is known about isthmuses and middle mesial (MM) canals in the Indian population. The primary aim of the present research was to determine the prevalence of MM canals and isthmuses of mandibular first molars in the Central India population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methodology CBCT of 140 mandibular first molar teeth was analyzed from the institutional database images in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. Data concerning the number of root canals, the presence of middle mesial canals, and the presence of isthmus were noted. Information collected was transferred into an Excel sheet and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Eight images (5.71%) revealed the presence of middle mesial canals with no statistically significant occurrence. The incidence of isthmi in the mandibular first molar was 84.3%, and the presence of isthmi in the coronal third was about 38.6%. This showed a considerable presence. Conclusion There is incidence of the middle mesial canal, which emphasizes the need to locate extra canals in patients undergoing root canal endodontic treatment. The implementation of CBCT will help identify the extra canal before the treatment. This will help ultimately in providing better patient care.

Incidence of missed middle mesial canal in endodontically treated mandibular molar teeth: A cone-beam computed tomography study

Background

In endodontic treatment, the aim is to completely determine, shape, and fill all root canals in a three-dimensional way. Missed canals lead to treatment failure. In mandibular molars, there may be an extra canal called the middle mesial canal between the mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of missed middle mesial canals in root canal-treated mandibular molar teeth.

Materials and Methods

In this study, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 1054 patients were analyzed. We identified 121 endodontically treated mandibular molars and evaluated the prevalence of missed canals.

Results

Although 33.05% of the root canal-treated teeth did not have a middle mesial canal, this canal was detected in the other 66.94%; 97.53% of teeth with a middle mesial canal could not be detected by clinicians.

Conclusion

Clinicians performing endodontic treatment of mandibular molar teeth should not ignore the presence of the middle mesial canal. Thus, it is very important for clinicians to have sufficient information about the localization, morphology, and variations of the middle mesial canal.

The global prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first and second molars assessed by cone beam computed tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis sought to identify the in vivo prevalence and influencing factors of middle mesial canal (MMC) in mandibular first and second molars based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

METHODS

MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, Google Scholar databases/search engines were searched in period between 15^th and 21^st November 2022, to retrieve the in vivo CBCT-based studies that assessed the prevalence of MMC in mandibular first and/or second molars. The studies were strictly assessed using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria for relevancy and eligibility through screening the title and abstract, and then assessed through reading the full texts using the same criteria. Subsequently, the fulfilled studies were assessed qualitatively using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and quantitatively using meta-analysis to calculate the pooled prevalence rates of MMC. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Egger's test.

RESULTS

Out of 1,122 studies, 33 studies comprised 13,349 and 7,624 mandibular first and second molars, respectively, were eligible for inclusion. Twenty studies scored high quality, while thirteen scored moderate quality. The global prevalence of MMC in the first molar was 4.4% (95% CI = 0.035-0.053, P<0.001), significantly higher than that of the second molar which was 1.3% (95%, CI = 0.008-0.018, P<0.001). Gender, molar side, and age were not influencing factors of MMC prevalence.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of MMC is not uncommon, being higher in the mandibular first molar compared to the mandibular second molar. The prevalence of MMC is not influenced by age, molar's side, and gender.

Middle mesial root canals in mandibular molars: prevalence and correlation to anatomical aspects based on CBCT imaging

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of middle mesial root canal (MMC) in a Brazilian subpopulation, verify whether its presence is related to anatomical characteristics of the tooth, and propose a classification using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHODS

CBCT scans of 284 patients were evaluated by 2 radiologists to determine the presence of the MMC in mandibular first and second molars. Subsequently, the mesiodistal and buccolingual measurements of the mesial roots were obtained; the measurements between the root canals, and from MMC to the mesiobuccal canal and to the mesiolingual canal were also obtained. The MMC was classified according to its relationship with mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals. The data were analyzed using χ2 and Fisher's exact test, multiple logistic regression analysis, Student's t-test, κ and intraclass correlation coefficient (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The intraexaminer agreements for the presence of the MMC and the measurements were considered almost perfect (0.953 and 0.999, respectively). Of 216 mandibular first molars, 11.1% had the MMC, and of 228 mandibular second molars, only 1.75% had the MMC. The presence was significant higher in the mandibular first molar (p < 0.0001). The buccolingual measurement and the measurement between mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals were higher in teeth with MMC (p = 0.024 and p = 0.005, respectively). It was possible to classify the configuration of MCC into four types: independent (60.7%), confluent (14.3%), mesiolingual confluent (14.3%), and mesiobuccal confluent (10.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of MMC is more pronounced in mandibular first molars and anatomical measurements, such as greater measurement between mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals, may alert clinicians to its presence. It was found four types of configurations of MMC.

Evaluation of Radix Entomolaris and Middle Mesial Canal in Mandibular Permanent First Molars in an Iraqi Subpopulation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

The aim of this study was to evaluate the radix entomolaris (RE) and middle mesial canal (MMC) in mandibular permanent first molars in an Iraqi subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Their prevalence and types were investigated in 201 patients (301 tooth subjects), among which 156 were of the right side, and 145 of the left side mandibular first molars (MFM), using CBCT scans. The effects of gender, age, and unilateral/bilateral on the presence of both RE and MMC were evaluated. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine the level of significance (p ≤ 0.05), and the kappa value was used to check reliability of results of the research. In MFM, the prevalence of right and left RE was 4.5% and 4.1%, respectively, and it was significantly higher in males than females (p = 0.006) based on the Chi-square test. No significant difference was identified in the prevalence of RE in relation to age and tooth position. MMC was found in 14.7% of teeth in the right side and 19.3% in the left side, with no significant differences for age or gender. MMC merged with mesiolingual canal presented with higher prevalence compared to other types of MMC (8.3% right side and 7.6% left side), again with no significant differences for age or gender. Within the limits of this study, no significant association was detected between the prevalence of MMC and RE in MFM.