Interleukin-1 Links Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Pathophysiology in Mixed-Pattern Psoriasis

Keratinocyte and myeloid MCPIP1 have distinct roles in maintaining skin homeostasis

The skin is a complex organ, and the intricate network between keratinocytes and immune cells is critical for ensuring skin function. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1-induced protein 1 (MCPIP1) is a ribonuclease that functions as a key negative modulator of inflammation. We previously reported that conditional deletion of MCPIP1 in keratinocytes (Mcpip1EKO) impairs skin integrity in adult mice. A similar phenotype was observed following the depletion of MCPIP1 in the myeloid compartment (Mcpip1MKO). The aim of this study was to develop a keratinocyte and myeloid double-MCPIP1 knockout mouse model to clarify the specific roles of myeloid and epidermal MCPIP1 in skin biology. Histological analyses indicated that the skin morphology changed after depletion of MCPIP1 in cells of myeloid origin as well as in keratinocytes. The thicknesses of the epidermal and subcutaneous fat layers increased in the mice with a loss of epidermal MCPIP1, whereas the loss of myeloid MCPIP1 had the opposite effect. In addition, both types of mice showed opposite responses to stimulation with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. Transcriptomic profiling of whole-skin lysates revealed some common target transcripts in all the knockout mice. Further analyses revealed that distinct pathways are modulated following the loss of epidermal or myeloid MCPIP1. The skin morphology and inflammatory phenotype of keratinocyte and myeloid double-MCPIP1 knockout mice resembled those of mice with only keratinocyte-specific knockout of MCPIP1. Overall, myeloid and epidermal MCPIP1 play important but distinct roles in the modulation of skin-related processes.

Imaging neuroinflammation in individuals with substance use disorders

Increasing evidence suggests a role of neuroinflammation in substance use disorders (SUDs). This Review presents findings from neuroimaging studies assessing brain markers of inflammation in vivo in individuals with SUDs. Most studies investigated the translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO) using PET; neuroimmune markers myo-inositol, choline-containing compounds, and N-acetyl aspartate using magnetic resonance spectroscopy; and fractional anisotropy using MRI. Study findings have contributed to a greater understanding of neuroimmune function in the pathophysiology of SUDs, including its temporal dynamics (i.e., acute versus chronic substance use) and new targets for SUD treatment.

The dynamic brain N-glycome

The attachment of carbohydrates to other macromolecules, such as proteins or lipids, is an important regulatory mechanism termed glycosylation. One subtype of protein glycosylation is asparagine-linked glycosylation (N-glycosylation) which plays a key role in the development and normal functioning of the vertebrate brain. To better understand the role of N-glycans in neurobiology, it's imperative we analyse not only the functional roles of individual structures, but also the collective impact of large-scale changes in the brain N-glycome. The systematic study of the brain N-glycome is still in its infancy and data are relatively scarce. Nevertheless, the prevailing view has been that the neuroglycome is inherently restricted with limited capacity for variation. The development of improved methods for N-glycomics analysis of brain tissue has facilitated comprehensive characterisation of the complete brain N-glycome under various experimental conditions on a larger scale. Consequently, accumulating data suggest that it's more dynamic than previously recognised and that, within a general framework, it has a given capacity to change in response to both intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli. Here, we provide an overview of the many factors that can alter the brain N-glycome, including neurodevelopment, ageing, diet, stress, neuroinflammation, injury, and disease. Given this emerging evidence, we propose that the neuroglycome has a hitherto underappreciated plasticity and we discuss the therapeutic implications of this regarding the possible reversal of pathological changes via interventions. We also briefly review the merits and limitations of N-glycomics as an analytical method before reflecting on some of the outstanding questions in the field.