Postoperative Complications in Genioplasty and Their Association with Age, Gender, and Type of Genioplasty

Transoral Feminizing Chondrolaryngoplasty: Development and Deployment of a Novel Approach in 77 Patients

Importance: Transgender patients who desire a gender-congruent neck contour may forego transcutaneous procedures due to the risk of neck scar stigmata related to such procedures. Objective: To describe the development and experience with the first 77 cases of a novel gasless transvestibular technique for gender-affirming surgery of the laryngeal prominence. Design, Setting, Participants: Video and narrative description of a novel surgical technique, and case series describing the consecutive first 77 patients to undergo transoral chondrolaryngoplasty (TCLP) at a quaternary transgender referral center. Results: Between November 2019 and April 2022, 77 patients underwent the novel surgery of TCLP. Median follow-up was 8.74 months (range: 1-30 months). Four patients suffered surgical complications (two laryngotomy, two skin necrosis), and three patients requested revision surgery. Conclusions and Relevance: TCLP is reported in the largest published series to date offering hidden incision for gender-affirming care. With further prospective outcome investigations, TCLP may prove to be a reliable approach of performing chondrolaryngoplasty while avoiding visible neck incisions.

Efficacy of photobiomodulation following L-PRF application for recovery of mental nerve neurosensory disturbances caused by genioplasty: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial

The present study assessed the efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) following leukocyte-platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) application for recovery of mental nerve neurosensory disturbances (NSDs) caused by genioplasty. This randomized triple-blind split-mouth clinical trial was conducted on 20 female patients (40 quadrants) requiring genioplasty. In each patient, one random side of the mandible served as the intervention (laser), and the other side as the control group. After genioplasty and L-PRF application, the intervention side underwent GaAIAs diode laser irradiation (880 nm, 500 mW, 15 J/cm2, 0.5 cm2 spot size, continuous-wave). Each point was laser irradiated for 15 s. Unilateral extraoral PBM was performed at 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days, postoperatively. Laser in off mode (sham laser) was used for the control side. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for general sensitivity, and 2-point discrimination, directional discrimination, pain discrimination, and thermal discrimination tests were used to assess the neurosensory recovery at 2 days, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 2 months, postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni test, and generalized estimating equation (alpha = 0.05). Time had a significant effect on improvement of all sensory variables (P < 0.05). Neurosensory recovery was significantly better in the intervention than the control group at all time points according to the two-point discrimination test (P = 0.0135) and brush test (P = 0.025) results. The interaction effect of time and intervention was not significant on any dependent variable (P > 0.05). Application of L-PRF + PBM resulted in significantly greater sensorineural recovery according to the two-point discrimination and brush test results.

Osseous genioplasty versus chin implants: early complications and patient satisfaction

Osseous genioplasty and chin augmentation with implants are the two main treatment options for retrognathia. This retrospective cohort study was performed to compare the prevalence of complications and patient satisfaction following osseous genioplasty and chin augmentation by implant. Eighty patients were included: 38 underwent advancement osseous genioplasty and 42 received chin implants (alloplastic, either Medpor or Silastic) intraorally or extraorally. The patients were assessed for complications 12 months after surgery, including neurosensory disturbances, infection or extrusion, wound dehiscence, and the need for reoperation. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analogue scale. The infection rate was significantly higher in the chin implant group than in the genioplasty group (P = 0.028). Moreover, dehiscence and the need for reoperation appeared to be more common following chin augmentation with implants. However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of neurosensory disturbances between the two groups (P = 0.137). In the chin implants group, the extraoral approach resulted in a lower dehiscence rate than the intraoral approach. Patients in the genioplasty group had significantly higher satisfaction scores than those in the chin implant group (P = 0.001). Overall, the rates of the complications assessed were lower and patient satisfaction was higher after osseous genioplasty when compared to chin augmentation with implants.

Guided Genioplasty: Comparison between Conventional Technique and Customized Guided Surgery

BACKGROUND

Genioplasty as an isolated surgical technique is a highly demanded procedure in the maxillofacial surgery area. Advances in facial reconstructive surgery have been associated with less morbidity and more predictable results. In this paper, "conventional" genioplasty and genioplasty by means of virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, and patient custom-made plates are compared.

METHODS

A descriptive observational study was designed and implemented, and 43 patients were treated, differentiating two groups according to the technique: 18 patients were treated by conventional surgery, and 25 patients were treated through virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and titanium patient-specific plates.

RESULTS

The operation time ranged from 35 to 107 min. The mean operative time in the conventional group was 60.06 + 3.74 min.; in the custom treatment group it was 42.24 + 1.29 min (p < 0.001). The difference between planned and obtained chin changes in cases of advancement or retrusion was not statistically significant (p = 0.125; p = 0.216). In cases of chin rotation due to asymmetry, guided and personalized surgery was superior to conventional surgery (p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was equal in both groups. A decrease in surgical complications was observed in the group undergoing VSP and customized treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-stage implementation of VSP with CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and patient-specific plates increased the accuracy of the genioplasty surgery, particularly in cases of chin asymmetry, reducing operation time and potential complications.

Aesthetic Genioplasty Based on Strategic Categorization

BACKGROUND

Genioplasty is a popular procedure used for lower facial contour correction. Various osteotomy techniques enable us to perform advancement, setback, reduction, or narrowing procedures. Computed tomographic images facilitate preoperative planning in detail. The authors used a novel planning method based on strategic categorization. The analytic results are described.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 208 patients who underwent genioplasty procedures for facial contouring from October of 2015 to April of 2020. During preoperative evaluation of the mandible, the operative procedure selected was one of three types: (1) horizontal segment osteotomy, (2) vertical and horizontal segment osteotomy, and (3) bone graft after repositioning. Adequate osteotomies were followed by rigid fixation using a titanium plate and screws. The follow-up period ranged from 8 to 24 months (average, 17 months). The results were assessed based on medical records, photographs, and facial bone computed tomographic images.

RESULTS

Overall, the patients were satisfied with the outcomes and had responder-based improvement in lower facial contour and balance. Chin point deviations were noted in 176 cases; left-side deviation ( n = 135) was more frequent than right-side deviation ( n = 41). Strategic osteotomies based on precise measurements led to correction of asymmetries. Temporary partial sensory losses reported in 12 cases resolved within an average of 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Each patient's chief complaint and bony structures should be carefully evaluated before genioplasty procedures are performed. During the operation, meticulous osteotomy, precise movement, and rigid fixation are necessary. The strategic process used for genioplasty resulted in aesthetic balance and predictable outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Surgical techniques used in chin feminization: Literature review and knowledge update

Genioplasty is commonly performed as part of facial feminization surgery. Commonly addressed areas in facial feminization surgery include the chin. According to some authors, 100% of patients request genioplasty surgery in order to feminize their faces. Specific genioplasty techniques (involving generally reduction surgery) applied to transgender patients have been rarely described in the literature. Objective: We aimed to carry out a review of the literature to update the current knowledge on this subject while achieving a comprehensive synthesis of the available surgical techniques for reduction genioplasty in trans Male to Female patients. Conclusion: Reduction genioplasty is frequently performed in facial feminization surgery. Multiple surgical techniques for chin feminization have been described in the existing literature. Reduction genioplasty requires combined work in the sagittal and transverse planes so as to obtain a harmonious result. However, no comparative study on the different surgical techniques has as yet been conducted. Patient satisfaction or surgical complications (which tend to be rare) cannot be related to any specific surgical technique.