Endovascular Treatment of Right Heart Masses Utilizing the AngioVac System: A 6-Year Single-Center Observational Study

A Retrospective Analysis of AngioVac Outcomes at a Tertiary Care Center

Background

The AngioVac system is a vacuum aspiration device approved for removal of right-sided cardiac thrombi. It has also been used for management of right-sided endocarditis in selected cases. Retrospective case series have reported high success rate and acceptable 30-day mortality, but there is limited data regarding outcomes beyond the immediate postoperative period. The purpose of this study is to describe our institution's experience with the AngioVac system for thrombus, vegetation, and tumor removal with a significant improvement over previously reported 1-year survival rates.

Methods

A retrospective review of AngioVac cases performed at our tertiary care center from 2016-2022 was done. From 2016-2022, 23 patients were identified, and their outcomes are described.

Results

Our review demonstrates 81.8% procedural success, 100% procedure survival, 90.9% survival to discharge, and 81.8% 30-day survival rates. One-year survival rate was 72.7%. Complications including an 18.2% rate of new vasopressor use, 54.5% rate of transfusion requirement, and 4.5% rate of acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis were identified. Intraprocedural embolization occurred in 1 case requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and thrombectomy. One case was converted to open surgical intervention.

Conclusions

Our review further supports the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive vacuum-assisted aspiration systems beyond the immediate postoperative period in intracardiac thrombus, tumor, and right-sided infective endocarditis. Our institution's experience emphasizes a team-based approach including interventional cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery with a standardized imaging approach with transesophageal echocardiogram. Future guidelines are needed to include an algorithmic approach to intracardiac masses.

Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Advanced Therapy for the Management of Right Heart Thrombus

BACKGROUND

The role of advanced therapies (systemic thrombolysis, catheter-based treatment, and surgical thrombectomy) for the management of right heart thrombus is poorly defined. In this study, we assessed the clinical predictors and outcomes of advanced therapy compared with anticoagulation alone for the acute management of right heart thrombus.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, we analyzed consecutive patients who were treated for right heart thrombus. The primary end point was 90-day all-cause mortality. Clinical predictors of utilizing advanced therapy were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare adjusted outcomes between patients receiving advanced therapies versus anticoagulation alone.

RESULTS

A total of 345 patients were included in the study. Advanced therapy was utilized in 13.6% (N=47) of patients, of which 25.5% (N=12/47) was systemic thrombolysis, 23.4% (N=11/47) was endovascular thrombectomy, and 53.2% (N=25/47) was surgical thrombectomy. Younger age (odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]) and concurrent pulmonary embolism (odds ratio, 5.36 [95% CI, 2.48-12.1]) predicted utilization of advanced therapy. In propensity score-matched analysis, there was no difference in 90-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.17-1.22]), in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.17-2.19]), or length of stay (β, -4.39 [95% CI, -14.0 to 5.22]) between advanced therapy and anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Among a diverse cohort of patients with right heart thrombus, outcomes did not differ between those who underwent advanced therapy and anticoagulation alone. Important predictors for utilizing advanced treatment included younger age and the presence of a concurrent pulmonary embolism. Future studies assessing advanced therapy in larger and broader patient populations are necessary.

Percutaneous debulking of tricuspid valve infective endocarditis vegetations using a large bore manual aspiration device - AlphaVac

Most infectious endocarditis patients can be managed medically. However, non-responders to antibiotics and ongoing sequelae such as septic emboli, may require mechanical interventions. AngioVac (Angiodynamics, Latham, NY, USA) is a percutaneous aspiration device used for removal of thrombi, emboli, masses, and vegetations. Main drawbacks are the requirement for a perfusionist, two large-bore accesses, and meticulous de-airing. These drawbacks make the procedure more time-consuming and possibly increase the risk of complications. AlphaVac (Angiodynamics) omits the motor element, thereby overcoming several of the limitations. In the current report, we describe two cases of percutaneous aspiration of tricuspid valve vegetations using AlphaVac.

Learning objective

To consider manual percutaneous aspiration of infective valvular vegetations using the AlphaVac cannula in case of insufficient response to antibiotics or for prevention of emboli.

Interventional Cardio-Oncology: Unique Challenges and Considerations in a High-Risk Population

OPINION STATEMENT

Patients with cancer are at risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) including atherosclerotic heart disease (AHD), valvular heart disease (VHD), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Advances in percutaneous catheter-based treatments, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AHD, percutaneous valve replacement or repair for VHD, and ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAODs) for AF, have provided patients with CVD significant benefit in the recent decades. However, trials and registries investigating outcomes of these procedures often exclude patients with cancer. As a result, patients with cancer are less likely to undergo these therapies despite their benefits. Despite the inclusion of cancer patients in randomized clinical trial data, studies suggest that cancer patients derive similar benefits of percutaneous therapies for CVD compared with patients without cancer. Therefore, percutaneous interventions for CVD should not be withheld in patients with cancer, as they may still benefit from these procedures.

Interventional Removal of LV Thrombus in a Patient With Cardiogenic Shock and Transitory Ischemic Attack

We discuss a 38-year-old bodybuilder who had cardiogenic shock and multiorgan failure. The patient developed significant speech disorders resulting from thromboembolism of a huge, volatile left ventricular thrombus. Because of inoperability and the threat of severe ischemic stroke, the thrombus was removed with a snare and application of a cerebral embolic protection device. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Navigating the Heart. The Evolution of the AngioVac System in a Single-center Experience

We investigated the efficacy, safety, and versatility of the AngioVac (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY) system for the treatment of intravascular and intracardiac masses of different origins. We prospectively enrolled all consecutive patients treated with the AngioVac system between July-2016 and November-2021 at our institution. Three configurations of the device were adopted in 44 patients: a venous-venous circuit in 21 cases (47.7%), a venous-arterial ECMO-like configuration in 20 (45.5%), and a venous-arterial-arterial circuit with 2 centrifugal pumps for left-sided cardiac masses in 3 (6.8%). Successful removal of the mass was achieved in 41 patients (93.2%), while in the other cases conversion to full sternotomy was necessary. Intraoperative complications occurred in 3 cases (6.8%), including 1 death, 1 pulmonary embolization, and 1 cardiac perforation. The AngioVac system is a valid, safe, and versatile option for the treatment of intravascular masses also in patients with prohibitive surgical risk.

AngioVac for Vegetation Debulking in Right-sided Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the utility of AngioVac-assisted vegetation debulking (AVD) in right sided infective endocarditis (RSIE) BACKGROUND: : AngioVac is a vacuum-based device that was approved in 2014 for the percutaneous removal of undesirable materials from the intravascular system. Although there are multiple reports on the use of the AngioVac device to aspirate right-sided heart chamber thrombi, data on its use to treat RSIE is limited.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the utility of AVD. The primary outcomes of our study were the procedural success, defined as the ability of AngioVac to produce residual vegetation size <50% (RVS<50%) without serious procedural complications, and the clinical success, defined as composite of RVS<50%, in-hospital survival, absence of recurrent bacteremia, and valve function not requiring further intervention. The secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcomes and average length of hospital stay. The pooled means and proportions of our data were analyzed using random effects model, generic inverse variance method, and represented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies, including 301 patients (mean age: 44.6±18.2 years, 71.6% males) were included. Procedural success was achieved in 89.2% of patients (95% CI:82.3%-93.6%, I²=0%). Clinical success was achieved in 79.1% of patients (95%CI:67.9%-87.2%, I²=15%). Overall survival rate was 89.7% (95% CI:83.1%-93.9%%, I²=9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that AVD is a promising therapeutic option for RSIE offering a high success rate with an acceptable complication rate across a wide range of patients.

A Rare Case of Intracavitary Cardiac Metastasis of Endometrial Carcinosarcoma

A 59-year-old female, with past medical history including endometrial carcinosarcoma with a port-a-cath device, presented due to shortness of breath. Transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated a mass extending from the right atrium, involving the tricuspid valve, and extending into the right ventricle. Our differential diagnosis included thrombus as well as endocarditis and malignancy; a thrombus was considered to be the most likely etiology due to the port-a-cath device. Use of the novel AngioVac mechanical aspiration device (AngioDynamics, 2021) allowed removal of the mass as well as evaluation by pathology, establishing the unlikely diagnosis of metastatic endometrial carcinosarcoma.