Prevalence of Missed Canals and Their Association with Apical Periodontitis in Posterior Endodontically Treated Teeth: A CBCT Study

Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular First Molar Root and Canal Morphology in Saudi Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

BACKGROUND The goal of conventional endodontic therapy is to clean the root canal system thoroughly, restore tooth function, and prevent re-infection. Success depends on understanding root canal morphology, resolving apical periodontitis, and using proper techniques. Studies highlight variations in root canal anatomy, with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) being crucial for accurate diagnosis despite its high cost and limited availability. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study reviewed CBCT images of 1820 (907 male, 913 female) patients aged 18 to 78 years. Analysis included 2081 mandibular first molars for variations in root and canal morphology and right- and left-side symmetry. Inter-orifice distance was measured, along with distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the level of canal bifurcation. RESULTS In this study, 96.01% of teeth had 2 roots and 3.89% had 3 roots. The percentages of canal configuration were 77.70% for 3 canals, 21.58% for 4 canals, 0.67% for 2 canals, and 0.05% for 1 canal. The inter-orifice distance was 2.07 mm for 2 canals in 1 root and 2.86 mm for 2 canals in separate distal roots. Distance from the CEJ to canal bifurcation varied significantly between 2 canals within 1 distal root (3.35 mm), 2 canals in separate distal roots (1.60 mm), as well as between distal (3.35 mm) and mesial roots (1.10 mm). CONCLUSIONS In mandibular first molars, only 3.89% have additional distolingual roots. Sex and ethnicity showed no influence on number of roots and canals. Distal canals showed a deeper bifurcation and greater inter-orifice distance than did mesial canals.

Prevalence of Apical Periodontitis in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

This systematic review was aimed to assess the prevalence of apical periodontitis (AP) in Saudi Arabia, focusing on individual-level prevalence and the frequency of AP in endodontically versus untreated teeth.

Methods

This review followed the PRISMA guidelines and involved searches in several databases, including PubMed-MEDLINE, Cochrane-CENTRAL, and EMBASE, without date restrictions until August 19th, 2023. Eligibility criteria encompassed studies using CBCT, panoramic, and periapical radiographs to diagnose AP in the Saudi population. The meta-analysis employed a random-effects model due to high heterogeneity among studies.

Results

From 359 records, 13 studies were included, indicating a 40% prevalence of AP in individuals and a 6% prevalence across all teeth within the Saudi population. Root canal-treated teeth demonstrated a higher prevalence at 47%. The data revealed a substantial prevalence of AP compared to global averages, with first molars being the most affected. Studies showed moderate risk of bias and significant heterogeneity.

Conclusion

The high occurrence of AP in Saudi Arabia, particularly in root-treated teeth, emphasizes the need for enhanced endodontic care and more accurate diagnostics. Urgent improvements in dental health policies and further research are essential to understand AP's impact and improve oral health outcomes.

Apical periodontitis in endodontically-treated teeth: association between missed canals and quality of endodontic treatment in a Colombian sub-population. A cross-sectional study

A high prevalence of post-treatment apical periodontitis associated to variables such as endodontic treatment quality and missed canals has been reported.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evalúate the quality of endodontic treatment and the frequency of missed canals associated with teeth with apicalperiodontitis (AP) through CBCTin a Colombian sub-population.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This was a cross-sectional study assessing 318 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of endodontically treated teeth from Colombian individuals. The scans were taken using J Morita X550 (J Morita Corporation, Osaka, Japan), with voxel size 0.125 to 0.20 mm. All endodontically treated teeth were assessed for quality of treatment, presence of missed canals and AP. Allsamples were analyzed bytwo endodontics specialists and an radiology specialist. Chi-square or Fisher 's test and odds ratio were calculated to identify the association and risk relationship between the presence of AP and the study variables.

RESULTS

Missed canals were found in 18.61% (86/462), and 95.3% were associated with AP. The frequency of AP was 62.34% (288/462) for all the evaluated teeth. AP was found in 27.43 % (79/288) of the teeth with adequate endodontic treatment, in contrast to 72.57% (209/288) of the teeth with inadequate treatment (P<0.01). The frequency of missed canals was highest in maxillary molars, with 55.23% (58/105), with 96.55% presenting AP. The second mesiobuccal canal wasthe most frequently missed canal, 88.52%o(54/61), with AP in 90.74% (49/54) of the cases.

CONCLUSIÓN

There was a high frequency of teeth with missed canals and PA. More than half of the teeth with missed canals were maxillary molars, with MB2 being the most common canal, commonly presenting apical periodontitis.

Relationship between apical periodontitis and missed canals in mesio-buccal roots of maxillary molars: CBCT study

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to: (1) assess the frequency of missed canals in the mesiobuccal root (MB) of endodontically treated maxillary molars and its association with apical periodontitis (AP); (2) examine the correlation between the presence of a confluent or separate missed MB2 canal and the prevalence of AP; and (3) examine the correlation between the technical quality of endodontic treatment in the MB1 canal and the prevalence of AP.

Methods

We obtained and examined 800 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from 800 patient records over 6 months. The parameters noted for each tooth included the tooth number; presence of missed canals in the MB root; configuration of missed MB2 canals (confluent or separate); technical acceptability of root canal treatment (RCT) of treated MB1 canals; and the CBCT periapical index score. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 24.

Results

A total of 203 maxillary molars from 148 CBCT scans were included. The MB2 canal prevalence was 88.2% in maxillary first molars and 62.7% in maxillary second molars. MB2 was found in 164 endodontically treated maxillary molars. During treatment, MB2 was missed in 150 (91.5%) and treated in 14 (8.5%) teeth. A total of 103 teeth (50.73%) had AP, which was observed in 67.3% of teeth with a missed MB2 canal but only 14.3% of teeth with a treated MB2 canal. The prevalence of AP was 43.7% in teeth with confluent MB2 canals and 80.9% in teeth with separate MB2 canals.

Conclusion

The MB2 canal frequency was significantly higher in the examined maxillary first molars than the maxillary second molars. The MB2 canal was missed in most teeth that underwent endodontic treatment. The AP prevalence was relatively higher in endodontically treated maxillary molars with missed MB2 canals.

Endodontic Orthograde Retreatments: Challenges and Solutions

Endodontic orthograde retreatments are considered one of the possible treatment options in case of post-treatment diseases considering the promising results present in the literature. Despite this, a plethora of articles have been published on this topic, and drawing conclusions could be challenging. For this reason, this review aims to summarize the crucial points on each aspect of non-surgical endodontic retreatments, discussing and comparing the current protocols, techniques, materials, and indications. Taking into consideration data from the literature, in terms of diagnosis, CBCT should be considered the first choice, since it can thoroughly affect the diagnosis and treatment plan. Regarding the procedural phases, some conclusions can be drawn: when present, coronal restoration materials such as crowns, partial prostheses, post, and core should be removed; the use of magnification devices, ultrasonic instruments, and an in-depth interpretation of radiographic images with both 2D and 3D images are strongly recommended during the orifice location; additional protocols such as irrigants activation, ultrasonic cleaning, and rotary or reciprocating instrumentation of treated canals are strongly recommended for filling materials removal and to achieve a high-quality chemo-mechanical disinfection; perforations should be treated as soon as possible, and the material of choice to treat them is the MTA or other calcium-silicate-based repair materials; the presence of ledges does not intrinsically reduce the success rate of RCRts if properly managed; in case of instrument fragments, their removal should be considered as the first treatment option, however many variables should be considered to select the proper technique or consider the option of bypassing.

Prevalence of missed canals in endodontically treated teeth: A cone-beam computed tomography study

Background

This study aimed to measure the prevalence of untreated root canals and periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and their association with the coronal seal.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study assessed CBCT images of studied patients alongside documented information from their dental examinations. The assessment method for analyzing CBCT images after including endodontically treated teeth was the presence of missed canals, and periapical lesions were analyzed in three dimensions.

Results

The evaluations from 772 teeth demonstrated that 89.4% of teeth had the proper coronal seal, 13.3% owned missed root canals, and 29.4% had periapical lesions. Most untreated canals belonged to maxillary first molars (71.8%) and mandibular lateral incisors (33.3%). The prevalence of periapical lesions was highest in mandibular lateral incisors (58.3%) and maxillary second molars (55.8%). In teeth with missed canals, the most periapical lesions were observed in the first premolars of both jaws. In teeth with the lack of proper coronal seal, the periapical lesions were observed in 55.6% of teeth with untreated root canals.

Conclusions

The results revealed a high prevalence of missed canals and periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth in our study population. Key words:Untreated Root Canals, Periapical Lesions, 3-D Dental Imaging, Dental Treatment Failure.

Anatomical Evaluation of Root and Root Canal Morphology of Permanent Mandibular Dentition among the Saudi Arabian Population: A Systematic Review

This study aimed to conduct a compendious review of root canal morphology of “permanent mandibular teeth in different regions of Saudi Arabia” to obtain a large sample representing the total population. A detailed search through the databases Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The data were analyzed based on the following inclusion criteria: original full-length original articles that reported the variables of interest “(number of roots, number of canals, Vertucci's classification system and C-shaped canals or mid-mesial canals)” of the mandibular teeth and conducted on Saudi subjects. The retrieved data were presented as frequencies and percentages. The results revealed that 56.6% of mandibular central incisors had one canal and Vertucci type I (56.6%), while 57.4% of the mandibular lateral incisors had one canal, with Vertucci types I and III most frequent. In mandibular canines, 91.8% had one canal and 8.2% had two canals. Most of the mandibular first premolars had one root (86.6%), while almost all mandibular second premolars (91.5%) had one canal, and 96.9% had Vertucci type I configuration. Among the mandibular first molars, three and four canals were prevalent in 58.7% and 40.6%, respectively. The majority of mesial roots had Vertucci type IV (60.6%), and most of distal roots had Vertucci type I (72.2%). Most of the mandibular second molars had three canals (87.3%) and showed Vertucci type IV (39.4%) canals for mesial roots and Vertucci type I (95.6%) for distal roots. The C-shaped canals were seen in 8% of first premolars and 9.8% of second molars. The middle mesial canal was found in 4.2% and 0.4% of first and second molars, respectively. This review could represent “the population of Saudi Arabia as the included samples were combined from different regions of the country.” Some variations were noticed within the same group of teeth from different regions. However, the overall results of combined samples were comparable to the other international studies.

The effects of endodontic access cavity design on dentine removal and effectiveness of canal instrumentation in maxillary molars

AIM

To evaluate in a laboratory setting, the impact of three designs of endodontic access cavities on dentine removal and effectiveness of canal instrumentation in extracted maxillary first molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

METHODOLOGY

A total of 30 extracted intact maxillary first molars were selected and scanned by micro-CT with a voxel size of 24 µm and randomly distributed into three groups: the traditional endodontic cavity (TEC) group, the conservative endodontic cavity (CEC) group and the guided endodontic cavity (GEC) group. The pulp chambers of teeth in the groups were accessed accordingly. After root canal preparation, the teeth were rescanned. The volume of dentine removed after canal preparation, the noninstrumented canal areas, canal transportation and centring ratio were analysed. Data were analysed statistically using one-way analysis of variance. Tukey's post hoc test was used for multiple comparisons. The significance level was set at p < .05.

RESULTS

The total volume of dentine removed was significantly greater in the TEC group after root canal preparation (p < .05). No significant differences in the volume of dentine removed occurred between the CEC and GEC groups (p > .05). The volume of dentine removed in the crown, pericervical dentine and coronal third of the canal was significantly lower in CEC and GEC groups when compared to that in the TEC group (p < .05), no difference was observed in the middle third of the canal and apical third of the canal amongst the three groups (p > .05). There was no significant difference in noninstrumented canal area, canal transportation and centring ratio amongst the TEC, CEC and GEC groups (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In extracted maxillary molars tested in a laboratory setting, CEC and GEC preserved more tooth tissue in the crown, pericervical dentine and coronal third of the canal compared with TEC after root canal preparation. The design of the endodontic access cavity did not impact on the effectiveness of canal instrumentation in terms of noninstrumented canal area, canal transportation and centring ratio.