1
|
Zhu C, Zhao T, Wu Q, Da M. The Efficacy of Aprepitant in Preventing Post-bariatric Surgery Nausea and Vomiting: Evidence from Clinical Trials. Obes Surg 2024; 34:2617-2626. [PMID: 38858295 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07338-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of aprepitant in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). METHODS Clinical trials meeting the inclusion criteria were identified through searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as clinical trials registered at clinicaltrials. gov. These trials compared aprepitant with the control or placebo groups among patients who underwent MBS. Meta-analysis was performed using StataSE 17.0 software to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the effectiveness of aprepitant in preventing PONV following MBS. RESULTS A total of five articles comprising six studies including 929 patients undergoing MBS were included. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in the incidence of PONV among patients receiving aprepitant (pooled RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.38-0.68, P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis indicated that aprepitant effectively reduced PONV incidence at 0, 6, and 12 h postoperatively in patients with MBS, but did not decrease PONV occurrence at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. CONCLUSION Aprepitant demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in preventing PONV following MBS, effectively reducing patient discomfort, and improving postoperative recovery. Therefore, aprepitant should be considered a preventive measure in patients undergoing MBS to enhance patient satisfaction and recovery rates. Additionally, to maintain an effective drug concentration, aprepitant should be administered within the first 24 h postoperatively. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD 42024528154.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenglou Zhu
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| | - Tiantian Zhao
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Qiong Wu
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Mingxu Da
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ortiz E, González AI, Jaime V, Guzmán JA, Esparza I, Orozco JO, Guerrero MA, Ramos A, Zerrweck C. The impact of Aprepitant on Nausea and Vomiting following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Obes Surg 2024; 34:1316-1323. [PMID: 38429485 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07129-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We aimed to compare the effects of aprepitant on the incidence of PONV after LSG. METHODS In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, the case group received the standard care regimen for PONV (dexamethasone 10 mg, ondansetron 4 mg, and metoclopramide 10 mg) plus prophylactic oral aprepitant 80 mg 1 h preoperatively. The control group received standard care plus a placebo. Comparative analyses using the Rhodes index were performed at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 400 patients (201 in the aprepitant group and 199 in the placebo group) underwent LSG. The groups were homogeneous. The aprepitant group experienced less PONV: early, 69 (34.3%) vs. 103 (51.7%), p ≤ 0.001; 6 h, 67 (33.3%) vs. 131 (65.8%), p ≤ 0.001; 12 h, 41 (20.4%) vs. 115 (57.8%), p ≤ 0.001; and 24 h, 22 (10.9%) vs. 67 (33.7%), p ≤ 0.001. Fewer patients in the aprepitant group vomited: early, 3 (1.5%) vs. 5 (2.5%), p = 0.020; 6 h, 6 (3%) vs. 18 (9%), p = 0.020; 12 h, 2 (1%) vs. 17 (8.5%), p = 0.006; and 24 h, 1 (0.5%) vs. 6 (3%), p = 0.040. Patients in the aprepitant group required less additional PONV medication: early, 61 (30.3%) vs. 86 (43.2), p = 0.008; 6 h, 7 (3.5%) vs. 34 (17%), p = 0.001; 12 h, 6 (3%) vs. 31 (15.6%), p ≤ 0.001; and 24 h, 5 (2.5%) vs. 11 (5.5%), p ≤ 0.001. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic aprepitant improved PONV between 0 h (early) and 24 h postoperatively in patients undergoing LSG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elías Ortiz
- Bariatric Surgery Department, Baja Hospital, Ernesto Sarmiento 2308, Burócrata, Ruiz Cortines, 22046, Tijuana, BCN, Mexico
| | - Alberto I González
- Bariatric Surgery Department, Baja Hospital, Ernesto Sarmiento 2308, Burócrata, Ruiz Cortines, 22046, Tijuana, BCN, Mexico
| | - Valeria Jaime
- Bariatric Surgery Department, Baja Hospital, Ernesto Sarmiento 2308, Burócrata, Ruiz Cortines, 22046, Tijuana, BCN, Mexico
| | - José A Guzmán
- Bariatric Surgery Department, Baja Hospital, Ernesto Sarmiento 2308, Burócrata, Ruiz Cortines, 22046, Tijuana, BCN, Mexico
| | - Isaac Esparza
- Bariatric Surgery Department, Baja Hospital, Ernesto Sarmiento 2308, Burócrata, Ruiz Cortines, 22046, Tijuana, BCN, Mexico
| | - José O Orozco
- Bariatric Surgery Department, Baja Hospital, Ernesto Sarmiento 2308, Burócrata, Ruiz Cortines, 22046, Tijuana, BCN, Mexico
| | - Manuel A Guerrero
- Anesthesiology department, Baja Hospital, Ernesto Sarmiento 2308, Burócrata, Ruiz Cortines, 22046, Tijuana, BCN, Mexico
| | - Almino Ramos
- Bariatric Surgery Department, Baja Hospital, Ernesto Sarmiento 2308, Burócrata, Ruiz Cortines, 22046, Tijuana, BCN, Mexico
| | - Carlos Zerrweck
- Bariatric Surgery Department, Baja Hospital, Ernesto Sarmiento 2308, Burócrata, Ruiz Cortines, 22046, Tijuana, BCN, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alam M, Shakeri A, Khorsand A, Nasseri K, Nasseri S. Assessing the impact of aprepitant and ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting in orthognathic surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:412. [PMID: 38093201 PMCID: PMC10717277 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02371-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common side effect associated with general anesthesia. Both ondansetron and aprepitant been effectively used to prevent PONV. However, there is a disagreement of opinions regarding the superiority of these two drugs. This study aims to compare the efficacy of aprepitant with ondansetron in preventing PONV following orthognathic surgeries. METHODS In this double-blinded clinical trial, 80 patients scheduled for orthognathic surgery at Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran, were randomly assigned to two groups. A standardized anesthesia protocol was used for all patients. The first group received a placebo capsule administered one hour before the surgical procedure along with 4 mg (2 ml) of ondansetron intravenously after anesthesia induction. The second group was given 80 mg aprepitant capsules one hour before the surgery, followed by an injection of 2 ml intravenous distilled water after anesthesia induction. The occurrence and severity of PONV, the amount of rescue medication required, and the complete response of patients assessed within 24 h after the surgery. RESULTS There were no significant differences in demographic data between the two groups. Patients in the aprepitant group had a significantly lower incidence and severity of nausea (2.5% versus 27.5%), vomiting (5% versus 25%), and required fewer rescue medications (7.5% versus 62.5%) compared to the ondansetron group. Additionally, the aprepitant group showed a higher complete response rate (90% versus 67.5%) in the 0-2 and 12-24 postoperative hours. CONCLUSION According to the findings of this study, aprepitant has demonstrated a greater efficacy in preventing PONV following orthognathic surgery, when compared to ondansetron. TRIAL REGISTRATION Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT code: IRCT20211205053279N3), date of registration: 16/12/2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Alam
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Shakeri
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ardeshir Khorsand
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Karim Nasseri
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| | - Sadaf Nasseri
- Research Institute of Dental Sciences-Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Health Service, Medical University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|